JURISDICTION AND LOCAL RULES. Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States. 28 U.S.C.A This is called federal

Similar documents
Mastering Civil Procedure Checklist

RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULE 5:5. PRETRIAL PROCEDURES AND PROCEDURES RELATING TO CERTAIN JUDGMENTS

LEWIS A. KAPLAN United States District Judge United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007

SUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY - IAS PART 56 PART RULES & PROCEDURES

INDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES JUDGE SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN

LegalFormsForTexas.Com

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CIVIL CASES Nelson S. Román, United States District Judge. Courtroom Deputy Clerk

TO REMOVE OR NOT TO REMOVE FEDERAL COURT, VENUE, AND OTHER JURISDICTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS

Cislo & Thomas LLP Litigation Cost Control (LCC ) Stages of Litigation and Expected Fees and Costs

Case 4:04-cv RAS Document 41 Filed 12/09/2004 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT

REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT. Seminar Presentation Rob Foos

SUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY IAS PART 14 PART MATRIMONIAL RULES & PROCEDURES (revised 05/23/17)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

Case 2:18-cv KOB Document 49 Filed 02/12/19 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:11-cv MGC Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/17/2011 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:15-cv LTS Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 7

Constitutional review by district court of administrative decisions and orders. A. Scope of rule. This rule governs writs of certiorari to

LOCAL SMITH COUNTY RULES OF CIVIL TRIAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURTS AND COUNTY COURTS AT LAW SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DISTRICT JUDGE EDWARD J. DAVILA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES

ARBITRATION RULES. Arbitration Rules Archive. 1. Agreement of Parties

All mandatory traffic, non criminal citations, etc., shall be set on the first Wednesday of the month.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendant/s.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

CALENDAR Q. JUDGE BILL TAYLOR 2007 RICHARD J. DALEY CENTER CHICAGO, ILLINOIS fax

Adopted November 10, 2000, by Chief District Court Judge John W. Smith. See Separate Section on Rules governing Criminal and Juvenile Courts Rule

Case: 5:14-cv JRA Doc #: 29 Filed: 01/28/15 1 of 6. PageID #: 284 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

MBE WORKSHOP: CIVIL PROCEDURE PROFESSOR LISA MCELROY DREXEL UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW

Case 2:16-cv JAK-AS Document 29 Filed 10/15/16 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:190

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Defendant.

Case 5:16-cv CAR Document 19 Filed 05/25/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

COMPLEX BUSINESS LITIGATION DIVISION PROCEDURES FOR THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA

CBA Municipal Court Pro Bono Panel Program Municipal Procedure Guide 1 February 2011

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) UNIFORM SCHEDULING ORDER

14 th JUDICIAL DISTRICT DISTRICT COURT DIVISION GENERAL CIVIL RULES

Judge Mary L. Mikva CALENDAR 6 - ROOM 2508 Telephone: 312/ Fax: 312/

The court annexed arbitration program.

PART 6: RESOLVING ISSUES AND PRESERVING RIGHTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Supreme Court of the State of New York County of Nassau IAS Trial Part 22 Part Rules Updated: January 25, 2018

CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT Title 3. Civil Rules Division 8. Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 1. General Provisions

R in a Nutshell by Mark Meltzer and John W. Rogers

Key Features of Proposed Changes to the North Carolina Business Court Rules May 6, 2016

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs,

Dodge County. 1) Rules of Decorum. (Sixth Judicial District)

LOCAL RULES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE CALENDARING OF CIVIL CASES DISTRICT COURT DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT CHANCERY DIVISION CALENDAR 7 COURTROOM 2405 JUDGE DIANE J. LARSEN STANDING ORDER 2.

Civil Procedure Basics. N.C. Rules of Civil Procedure 7/6/2010

SUMMARY OF CHANGES COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION RULES

RULES GOVERNING ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

COURT RULES OF THE HONORABLE RICHARD MOTT, J.S.C. 401 Union Street Columbia County Courthouse (Temporary)

INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

COMMERCIAL CALENDAR I (Effective January 30, 2012)

Rule 2:3 Use of Facility Dog Rule 1:6 (revised) Courtroom Decorum

UNIFORM STANDING ORDER FOR ALL COMMERCIAL CALENDARS

LA. REV. STAT. ANN. 9:

Case: 2:15-cv MHW-NMK Doc #: 20 Filed: 07/01/15 Page: 1 of 10 PAGEID #: 143

Medina County Court of Common Pleas. Rules of the General Division

REQUEST TO DISTRICT CIVIL CALENDAR CLERK

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF JACKSON BUSINESS COURT DIVISION. via telephone (check one) /

MOHAVE COUNTY JUSTICE COURT

ARTICLE 19: CHANCERY, EMINENT DOMAIN, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS AND MISCELLANEOUS REMEDIES

CASE NO: FORECLOSURE SCHEDULING ORDER. 1. Any prior order referring this case to Senior Judge Sandra Taylor is hereby VACATED.

WYOMING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR CIRCUIT COURTS

LR IN CAMERA SUBMISSIONS AND SEALED DOCUMENTS.

being preempted by the court's criminal calendar.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/27/ :11 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/27/2018

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE JON S.

THE COURTS. Title 249 PHILADELPHIA RULES

ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE

LOCAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR THE SUPERIOR COURTS OF JUDICIAL DISTRICT 16B

CIVIL DIVISION I PROCEDURES FOR THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA

HAWAII ADMINISTRATIVE RULES TITLE 12 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS SUBTITLE 7 BOARDS CHAPTER 47

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL CIVIL DIVISION

Courtroom Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Gary L. Sweet Courtroom B Okeechobee County Courthouse

Civil (Non-Domestic) Differentiated Case Management Plan for Howard County, Maryland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. MC JFW(SKx)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

[Related Statewide Rule NMRA]

ARBITRATION RULES FOR THE TRANSPORTATION ADR COUNCIL

19 th Judicial Circuit Court Judge Janet Croom Guidelines and Procedures. Circuit Civil Jury Division (Updated: September, 2017)

Case 1:11-cv JEM Document 60 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/22/2011 Page 1 of 8

SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA

Wine and Cheese: Magistrate Judge and District Judge Pairings. Hon. Dustin Pead Hon. Robert Shelby Hon. David Nuffer Anne Morgan

The American Court System BASIC JUDICIAL REQUIREMENTS. Jurisdiction

HONORABLE ANNA H. DEMACOPOULOS STANDING ORDER CALENDAR 13 ROOM

INDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES FOR CIVIL CASES. Lorna G. Schofield United States District Judge

Eleventh Judicial District Local Rules

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 212 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 5

Courtroom Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Elizabeth A. Metzger Courtroom B, Okeechobee County Courthouse

U.S. District Court Northern District of Alabama (Southern) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:00-cv WMA

COPYRIGHT 2009 THE LAW PROFESSOR

Case 3:17-cv RS Document 380 Filed 04/19/18 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Recent Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Mississippi Bar Convention Summer School for Lawyers 2016

Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex Commercial Disputes)

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Transcription:

JURISDICTION AND LOCAL RULES Federal district courts have original jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States. 28 U.S.C.A. 1331. This is called federal question jurisdiction. As a general statement, diversity original jurisdiction exists in federal district courts when the matter in controversy exceeds $75,000 and is between citizens of different states. 28 U.S.C.A. 1332. This is called diversity jurisdiction. Supplemental jurisdiction is provided by 28 U.S.C.A. 1367. The federal district court has jurisdiction over all other claims that are so related to claims in the action within such original jurisdiction that they form part of the same case or controversy.... Additional parties can be joined. However, the federal district court can decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over a claim if: (1) the claim raises a novel or complex issue of State law, (2) the claim substantially predominates over the claim or claims over which the district court has original jurisdiction, (3) the district court has dismissed all claims over which it has original jurisdiction, or (4) in exceptional circumstances, there are other compelling reasons for declining jurisdiction. The requirements for removal of an action pending in state court are set forth in 28 U.S.C.A. 1441. They are, generally: (1) Complete diversity between plaintiffs and defendants (the citizenship of fictitious defendants is disregarded), or

(2) The action includes a federal question. The procedure for removal is set forth in 28 U.S.C.A. 1446. It is, generally: (1) File a notice of removal in federal court within 30 days of receipt by the defendant of a copy of the complaint. (2) All defendants served must join in or consent to the removal. (3) Removal must usually be within one year from commencement of the action. (4) Give notice to adverse parties and state court. The clarifications to diversity jurisdiction and removal made by Public Law 112-63 are: (1) Each defendant has 30 days from service on that defendant within which to file removal pleadings. (2) If the plaintiff does not plead the amount in issue, a removing defendant can state in the removal papers that more than $75,000 is at issue. A defendant can also use discovery in state court to determine if more than $75,000 is at issue and if it is determined to be so, then remove within 30 days. (3) If a citizen of the state is a defendant and is not served, the action is removable. Question: What happens if a resident defendant is served after removal? (4) All defendants served must join or consent to removal for the removal to be effective. Note: The consent must be written and filed within the removal time. Note: Removal of class actions is different. (5) There is a one year time limit from commencement of the action within which to remove, except: a. If the plaintiff has acted in bad faith to prevent removal, or

b. The plaintiff deliberately failed to disclose the true amount of damages claimed. (6) The provision that permitted alien persons who are lawfully admitted residents to be considered as citizens for diversity jurisdiction purposes was removed. (7) All foreign and domestic corporations will be considered a citizen of each state (foreign or domestic) where it is incorporated and where it has its principal place of business. Public Law 112-63 also redefines venue. New Mexico has only one federal judicial district, so this provision will not be of significance to New Mexico federal court litigation. However, many of the more populated states have multiple federal districts and the venue provisions should be reviewed for federal court litigation there. The Civil Justice Expense And Delay Reduction Plan addresses the local rules and establishes a case differential and management plan. It establishes four different tracks for civil cases. Each case will be assigned to one of the tracks, which are: (1) Expedited Cases A disposition time of within 9 months, after case is at issue, is the goal for such cases. Initial conferences with parties present or available will be set with magistrate or district judges within 60 days after such cases are at issue for scheduling and management plans and setting of early trial dates. (c) Discovery cut-off dates will be set no later than 100 days after the filing of the scheduling order.

(d) Periodic conferences and status reports thereafter will be required as (2) Standard Cases determined by the assigned magistrate and/or district judge. Disposition goal will be within 12 months or less after such cases are at issue. Initial conferences with parties present are set with magistrate or district judges within 60 days after such cases are at issue for scheduling and management plan and setting of early trial dates. (c) Discovery cut-off dates are set no later than 200 days after filing of the scheduling order. (d) Periodic conferences held and status reports required thereafter as (3) Complex Cases determined by the assigned magistrate and/or district judge. Disposition goal will be within 18 months after cases is at issue. Within 30 days after a case is at issue, the assigned magistrate or district judge holds an initial conference with parties present where the judicial officer: [1] Explores the receptivity of settlement or proceeding with the litigation; [2] Identifies and formulates the principal issues in contention, provides for staged resolution or bifurcation of issues consistent with Rule 42 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;

[3] Prepares a discovery schedule and plan consistent with the time limits set by the court for completion of discovery and with any procedures the court develops as to (1) discovery and (2) phase discovery into two or more stages, and, [4] Sets earliest practicable motions timing and as early a trial date as practical. (4) Administrative Cases These are cases which based on the court s prior experience are likely to result in default or consent judgment, resolved or dismissed on the pleadings or by motion. Such cases are referred directly by the Clerk s Office to a magistrate judge for preparation of a report and recommendation unless the matter deals with a temporary restraining order or temporary injunctive relief in which occasion, the Clerk shall refer such matters immediately to the assigned district judge. (c) Generally, there will be no discovery for this track without prior leave of Court. Rule 7 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure deals with motion practice. A movant must determine whether a motion is opposed and a motion that omits recitation of a good faith request for concurrence may be summarily denied. An unopposed motion should be accompanied by a proposed order approved by each party. With regard to opposed motions, a response must be served and filed within 14 calendar days after service of the motion. A reply must be served and filed within 14 calendar days after service of the response. If service is made by email on a party

that has consented to such service, an additional 3 days are added after the period would otherwise expire under Rule 6. The movant s brief must not exceed 27 double spaced pages, a response brief must not exceed 24 double spaced pages and a reply brief must not exceed 12 double spaced pages. There is a 50 page limit for exhibits to a motion, response or reply. Under local Rule 16.1 the parties must file a joint status report following a FRCP 26(f) meet and confer conference. After filing of that report, the Court will enter a Scheduling Order setting all pretrial case management deadlines. Local Rule 26.6 provides that motions to compel must be filed within 21 days of service of an objection to discovery, or the objection can be deemed accepted. One of the most important civil law aspects of federal court is that settlement conferences are mandated. They are usually conducted by a federal magistrate judge. They can be quite effective and cost efficient. Under local Rule 73, cases will be initially assigned to two federal magistrate judges. One is to be the trial judge, if the parties consent. The other acts as a discovery and motions judge. Cases to be tried by a Magistrate Judge usually move to a quicker resolution. The local federal rules also contain numerous forms for convenience. They include a Civil Cover Sheet, Authorization To Disclose Protected Health Information, Joint Status Report, Consent and Order of Reference to U.S. Magistrate Judge, and Pretrial Order. The federal judicial district is divided into three jury divisions. They are referred to as the northern jury division, the central jury division, and the southern jury division. The northern division is generally the northeast third of the state, the central division is generally the northwest third of the state and the southern division is generally the southern third of the state. A map of those divisions is enclosed in the materials.