IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF TWIN FALLS

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/15/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2015

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 1:11-cv CMA -BNB Document 1 Filed 04/07/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:16-cv PGG Document 1 Filed 09/26/16 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

INDEX NO. UNASSIGNED NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2018 SUMMONS

Plaintiffs OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS v. Defendants JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION, JURY DEMAND AND REQUEST FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 3:16-cv WHB-JCG Document 4 Filed 05/31/16 Page 1 of 8

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION

PLAINTIFF AVA SMITH- THOMPSON S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT SARA LEE CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN THE DISTRICT COURT FOR ROGERS COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA PETITION

CAUSE NO. COMES NOW, Plaintiff, Colin Shillinglaw, and files this Original Petition, complaining

) ) Plaintiff, Christina Chisholm, complaining of Defendants, Tauheed Epps, and. Ro Zay Richie, alleges and says:

Case 2:13-cv JRG-RSP Document 12 Filed 07/10/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 104

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/16/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Case No.

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 12/15/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF RICHLAND ) DAWN M. ST ALEY, ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) SUMMONS FILE NO.

Case: 3:11-cv TMR Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/07/11 Page: 1 of 13 PAGEID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case3:15-cv Document1 Filed07/10/15 Page1 of 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT YAKIMA

Case 3:14-cv B Document 1 Filed 06/18/14 Page 1 of 18 PageID 1

EBERHARD SCHONEBURG, ) SECURITIES LAWS

1. Under what theory, or theories, if any, might Patty bring an action against Darby? Discuss.

Page 1 of 8 TO THE DEFENDANT ABOVE-NAMED: SARAH ( SALLY ) WARWICK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/26/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case: 1:11-cv DAP Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/19/11 1 of 9. PageID #: 1

Case 1:16-cv BLW Document 1 Filed 11/17/16 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

Case 9:17-cv DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/13/2017 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOURTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

Case 1:14-cv RGS Document 1 Filed 08/01/14 Page 1 of 16

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 10/11/16 Page 1 of 8 : : : : : : : : : : :

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE MIDDLE DIVISION

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants.

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/11/16 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No. Plaintiff, Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

Case 2:18-cv JTM-MBN Document 1 Filed 06/04/18 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 3:17-cv LB Document 1 Filed 07/17/17 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Civil Action No. 5:08-CV D

Case 0:17-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/13/2017 Page 1 of 12

26 /1/ 28 /1/ Donny E. Brand (SBN ) BRAND LAW FIRM E. 4th St., Suite C-473

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1

Case: 4:15-cv BYP Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/11/15 1 of 18. PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants.

Case 1:17-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/06/2017 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA PHOENIX ARIZONA DIVISION. Plaintiff, pro se )

Case 1:11-cv RMC Document 1 Filed 08/20/10 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 09/03/ :48 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/04/2014

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

CAUSE NO CV ANNA DRAKER IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF VS. MEDINA COUNTY, TEXAS

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/30/18 Page 1 of 7 THE PARTIES

Case 1:16-cv LGS Document 21 Filed 04/11/16 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Case 1:18-cv WJM-KLM Document 1 Filed 11/07/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:17-cv FDS Document 1 Filed 02/23/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 2:15-cv SVW-AS Document 1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 4:11-cv BLW Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/18/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1

STATE OF OHIO IN THE MENTOR MUNICIPAL COURT CIVIL DIVISION. Case No. Hon. PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (JURY DEMAND ENDORSED HERON)

Case 3:16-cv DPJ-FKB Document 9 Filed 10/24/16 Page 1 of 11

Attorneys for Plaintiffs LARRY KING ENTERPRISES, INC. and ORA MEDIA LLC

PlainSite. Legal Document. Florida Middle District Court Case No. 6:10-cv Career Network, Inc. et al v. WOT Services, Ltd. et al.

Case 2:16-cv SDW-LDW Document 5 Filed 09/01/16 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 22

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ALAN GRABISCH, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION. CASE NO: 1:15-cv RNS

Case 1:11-cv NLH-KMW Document 19 Filed 06/01/12 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 196 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 2:14-cv EJF Document 2 Filed 08/29/14 Page 1 of 27 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 04/04/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:1

Case 1:11-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/06/2011 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:12-cv JCM-VCF Document 1 Filed 11/13/12 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:14-cv REB Document 1 Filed 07/03/14 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:18-cv BLW Document 1 Filed 01/17/18 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. ) ) ) Case No. ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ) ) ) ) Plaintiff,

Case: 1:16-cv WOB Doc #: 4 Filed: 06/03/16 Page: 1 of 12 PAGEID #: 15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

2:15-cv RMG Date Filed 09/17/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOUGLAS COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 06/05/16 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:18-cv NLH-KMW Document 1 Filed 06/22/18 Page 1 of 18 PageID: 1

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 09/24/15 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:1

Case 4:10-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/18/10 Page 1 of 9

Case 8:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/07/18 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

TORT LAW. By Helen Jordan, Elaine Martinez, and Jim Ponce

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-381 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Transcription:

Electronically Filed 4/24/2017 8:50:30 AM Fifth Judicial District, Twin Falls County Kristina Glascock, Clerk of the Court By: Elisha Raney, Deputy Clerk Debora K. Kristensen, ISB #5337 Kenneth R. McClure, ISB #2616 GIVENS PURSLEY LLP 601 West Bannock Street Boise, Idaho 83702 Telephone: (208) 338-1200 Fax: (208) 388-1300 Email: dkk@givenspursley.com krm@givenspursley.com Mark J. MacDougall (Pro Hac Vice Pending) Connor Mullin (Pro Hac Vice Pending) AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD, LLP 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036 Telephone: (202) 887-4000 Facsimile: (202) 887-4288 Email: mmacdougall@akingump.com cmullin@akingump.com Attorneys for Plaintiff IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF TWIN FALLS CHOBANI, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, vs. Plaintiff, ALEXANDER ( ALEX ) E. JONES; INFOWARS, LLC, a Texas limited liability company; FREE SPEECH SYSTEMS, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, Case No. CV42-17-1659 VERIFIED COMPLAINT Category A. A. Fee: $221 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendants. VERIFIED COMPLAINT - 1 13649579_2.docx [11411-66]

Plaintiff Chobani, LLC ( Chobani ), by and through its undersigned counsel of record, alleges as its Complaint against Defendants Alexander ( Alex ) E. Jones, InfoWars, LLC ( InfoWars ), and Free Speech Systems, LLC (collectively, the Defendants ) as follows: PARTIES 1. Chobani is a Delaware limited liability company with roughly 1,000 employees in Twin Falls, Idaho and principal offices located at 147 State Highway 320, Norwich, New York 13815. 2. Defendant Alex Jones is a resident of Austin, Texas. He is the host of radio and web-based shows, including The Alex Jones Show, and owns and operates the websites InfoWars.com and PrisonPlanet.com. The Alex Jones Show has millions of weekly listeners and is nationally syndicated on approximately 60 radio stations. 3. Defendant InfoWars, LLC is a Texas limited liability company with principal offices located at 100 Congress Avenue, 22nd Floor, Austin, Texas 78701. 4. Defendant Free Speech Systems, LLC is a Texas limited liability company with principal offices located at 100 Congress Avenue, 18th Floor, Austin, Texas 78701. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 5. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to Idaho Code Section 1-705. 6. This Court has personal jurisdiction over each of the Defendants in this action pursuant to Idaho Code Sections 5-514(a)-(b) because the Defendants have transacted business within the State of Idaho and have committed tortious acts within the State of Idaho that have caused harm to the Plaintiff s business, which is located in the State of Idaho. VERIFIED COMPLAINT - 2

7. Venue is proper in Twin Falls County, Idaho pursuant to Idaho Code Section 5-404 because the Plaintiff resides in Twin Falls County and maintains a place of business in the State in Twin Falls County. GENERAL ALLEGATIONS 8. Defendant Alex Jones is no stranger to spurious statements. He has claimed that the U.S. government orchestrated the 9/11 attacks and the mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut. The Southern Poverty Law Center described Mr. Jones as almost certainly the most prolific conspiracy theorist in contemporary America. 1 Mr. Jones has now taken aim at Chobani and the Twin Falls community. 9. On April 11, 2017, Defendants published a video on InfoWars.com and The Alex Jones Channel of YouTube, purporting to describe (1) Chobani s practice of hiring refugees, and (2) an assault unrelated to Chobani. The background of the video repeatedly depicts, and in doing so misrepresents, Chobani s owner and Chobani s products. 10. The reporters featured in the video are David Knight, who has been employed as a nightly news reporter for Defendant InfoWars for approximately four years, and Lee Ann Mcadoo, who is also a reporter for Defendant InfoWars. 11. In the video, Mr. Knight republishes the false statement that the Chobani plant brought crime and tuberculosis to the community. 12. On April 11, 2017, Defendants promoted the video on The Alex Jones Channel of YouTube which has more than two million subscribers using the headline MSM [mainstream media] Covers for Globalist s Refugee Import Program After Child Rape Case. 2 1 https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/individual/alex-jones. 2 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffip6i5apcm. VERIFIED COMPLAINT - 3

The video published on The Alex Jones Channel has received 22,349 views as of the date of this Complaint. 13. On April 11, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Defendants InfowarsNews Twitter handle (@PrisonPlanetTV) published the video on Twitter with the headline Idaho Yogurt Maker Caught Importing Migrant Rapists. (Emphasis added). That same day, the video was republished in a wide range of YouTube channels with the same headline, including a channel apparently associated with the Defendants ( Best of INFOWARS ). 3 3 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxgv-ponx1c. VERIFIED COMPLAINT - 4

14. On April 11, 2017, Defendant Alex Jones, using the Twitter handle @RealAlexJones, re-tweeted the video with the same headline. VERIFIED COMPLAINT - 5

15. At the time of filing of this Complaint, Defendant Alex Jones tweet has been re-tweeted 148 times. 16. Several Twitter users and other Internet commentators have responded to Defendants statements with calls to boycott Chobani. 17. Defendants statements and related videos have proliferated on websites around the Internet. 18. As of the date of this Complaint, the defamatory statements remain accessible online. 19. Defendants have declined to remove the defamatory statements or publish a retraction despite multiple written demands from the Plaintiff. VERIFIED COMPLAINT - 6

FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF DEFAMATION (Against All Defendants) 20. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the foregoing paragraphs as though set forth fully herein. 21. The Defendants statements described in Paragraphs 9-14 above (collectively, the defamatory statements ) are false and defamatory. 22. Defendants published to thousands of subscribers and viewers on Twitter, YouTube, and other platforms widely available to the public, false statements, including the false accusations that Chobani was caught importing migrant rapists and that Chobani s plant has brought crime and tuberculosis to the Twin Falls community. Defendants defamatory statements were subsequently republished with great velocity on a wide range of websites. 23. The Defendants defamatory statements were made as assertions of fact. 24. The Defendants defamatory statements were of and concerning the Plaintiff. 25. The Defendants defamatory statements were designed to (1) discourage members of the public from purchasing Plaintiff s products, (2) harm Plaintiff s reputation, (3) subject the Plaintiff to public contempt, disgrace, or ridicule, and (4) adversely affect Plaintiff s business interests. 26. Defendants acted with actual malice. Defendants defamatory statements were knowingly false or made with reckless disregard for the truth or falsity of the statements at the time the statements were made. Nowhere in the video do the Defendants state that the Plaintiff was caught importing migrant rapists. Defendants promoted the video with the defamatory headline Idaho Yogurt Maker Caught Importing Migrant Rapists despite knowing that the statement was false or while clearly doubting the truth of the statement. VERIFIED COMPLAINT - 7 13649579_2.docx [11411-66]

27. The Defendants defamatory statements were not privileged. 28. The Defendants defamatory statements were designed to cause and did in fact cause customers to call for a boycott of Chobani s products. 29. The Defendants defamatory statements have caused and continue to cause harm to Idaho residents, including Chobani employees, their families, and other members of the Twin Falls community associated with Chobani. 30. As a result of the conduct of the Defendants, the Plaintiff has suffered and continues to suffer substantial damages in an amount to be proven at trial. herein. SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF DEFAMATION PER SE (Against all Defendants) 31. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the foregoing paragraphs as though set forth fully 32. The Defendants defamatory statements constitute defamation per se. The harmful nature of the defamatory statements is self-evident. 33. The defamatory statements plainly and unambiguously impute conduct on the part of Chobani that amounts to a criminal offense. Defendants falsely accuse Chobani of importing migrant rapists and bringing crime and tuberculosis into the community, among other false statements. Such bald accusations of criminal conduct constitute classic examples of defamation per se. 34. The defamatory statements further constitute defamation per se to the extent they impute conduct on the part of Chobani that is incompatible with the lawful operation of its business. VERIFIED COMPLAINT - 8

35. The Defendants publicly communicated the defamatory statements to a wide audience of subscribers and other online viewers causing significant damages to the Plaintiff. 36. As a result of the conduct of the Defendants, the Plaintiff has suffered and continues to suffer substantial damages in an amount to be proven at trial. 37. As a result of the defamatory per se conduct of Defendants, the Plaintiff is entitled to an award of presumed damages. THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF BREACH OF IDAHO CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT UNFAIR COMPETITION (Against all Defendants) herein. 38. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the foregoing paragraphs as though set forth fully 39. Idaho Code Section 48-603(8) provides: The following unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce are hereby declared to be unlawful, where a person knows, or in the exercise of due care should know, that he... is... [d]isparaging the goods, services, or business of another by false or misleading representations of fact. 40. By publishing the statements that Chobani was caught importing migrant rapists and was responsible for introducing crime and tuberculosis into the community, Defendants knowingly misrepresented the facts. 41. The Defendants made these false and misleading statements in order to cause harm to Plaintiff s business and reputation. 42. The Defendants statements constitute acts of unfair competition in violation of the Idaho Consumer Protection Act. VERIFIED COMPLAINT - 9

43. Plaintiff has been damaged as a direct and proximate result of Defendants unfair competition in an amount to be determined at trial. PUNITIVE DAMAGES 44. The Defendants conduct in this matter was extreme, outrageous, and warrants punitive damages. Chobani expressly reserves the right to seek leave to add a claim for punitive damages pursuant to Idaho Code Section 6-1604. DEMAND FOR ATTORNEYS FEES 45. The Defendants actions have required Plaintiff to retain counsel to represent its interests. Plaintiff is entitled to an award of its reasonable costs and attorneys fees pursuant to Idaho Code Sections 12-120(3), 12-120(5), 12-121, and 12-123. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 46. Pursuant to Idaho Rule of Civil Procedure 38, Plaintiff respectfully demands a jury trial of twelve citizens on all issues raised in this Complaint and triable of right by jury. Plaintiff will not stipulate to less than 12 jurors. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff prays for the following relief: 1. For judgment against the Defendants for the monetary (both actual and presumed) damages suffered by Chobani as a result of the actions and conduct of the Defendants described above, in an amount to be determined at trial, but in excess of $10,000; 2. For judgment that each of the Defendants are jointly and severally liable for the monetary damages suffered by Chobani as a result of the actions and conduct of the Defendants; 3. For a declaratory judgment from this Court stating that the Defendants statements are false and defamatory and that the Plaintiff is entitled to judgment as a matter of law; VERIFIED COMPLAINT - 10

4. For judgment against each Defendant for Chobani s reasonable costs and attorneys fees; and 5. For such other and further relief as the Court deems just and equitable. DATED this 24 th day of April, 2017. GIVENS PURSLEY LLP By: /s/ Debora K. Kristensen Debora K. Kristensen AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD, LLP By: /s/ Mark J. MacDougall Mark J. MacDougall Attorneys for Plaintiff VERIFIED COMPLAINT - 11