Case 0:16-cv JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2016 Page 1 of 11

Similar documents
Filing # E-Filed 11/06/ :26:27 AM

Case 0:10-cv KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/10/2010 Page 1 of 7

Case 0:17-cv KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2017 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 0:18-cv FAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2018 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. -v- Civil No. 3:12-cv-4176

2.1T FILED. 3; b ov 16go-J-.9s- CLERK, U. S. DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 9:17-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/04/2017 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 2:16-cv JTM-TJJ Document 1 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 06/13/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 3:10-cv HEH Document 1 Filed 08/19/10 Page 1 of 7

6:15-cv MGL Date Filed 10/13/15 Entry Number 26 Page 1 of 13

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION. v. CASE NO. 15-CV-1588

Case 0:15-cv WJZ Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/30/2015 Page 1 of 9. Exhibit A

Case 1:19-cv LY Document 1 Filed 04/12/19 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/23/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/07/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Defendants.

P H I L L I P S DAYES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv AJN Document 17 Filed 03/24/17 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case: 3:15-cv jdp Document #: 1 Filed: 02/10/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Case 5:15-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 07/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv DPG Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/04/2017 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 01/20/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CASE NO.:

Case 2:14-cv JFW-AGR Document 1 Filed 06/10/14 Page 1 of 18 Page ID #:1

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1. Plaintiffs, COMPLAINT

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/27/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 3:12-cv M Document 6 Filed 11/07/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID 18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

2:14-cv DCN Date Filed 10/23/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10

Case 8:17-cv VMC-MAP Document 1 Filed 03/15/17 Page 1 of 17 PageID 1 MUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

2:18-cv CSB-EIL # 1 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION COMPLAINT

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/30/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1. No.: Defendants.

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 39 Filed: 02/17/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:163

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/03/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CASS COUNTY, MISSOURI AT HARRISONVILLE

Case 4:18-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 05/21/18 Page 1 of 15


Case: 1:17-cv DCN Doc #: 14 Filed: 03/02/17 1 of 19. PageID #: 69

(212) (212) (fax) Attorneysfor Named Plaintiffand the proposed FLSA Collective Plaintiffs

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/04/16 Page 1 of 23

Case 2:16-cv LDW-SIL Document 1 Filed 11/28/16 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 19. No. 16-cv-6584

Case 2:17-cv JES-CM Document 1 Filed 07/24/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID 1 UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/31/17 Page 1 of 14

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 4:12-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/04/12 Page 1 of 6

Case 5:12-cv LS Document 1 Filed 03/19/12 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 5:14-cv DAE Document 4 Filed 11/10/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 5:18-cv EJD Document 31 Filed 05/03/18 Page 1 of 14

Case 6:17-cv JA-GJK Document 1 Filed 12/14/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT

Case 1:17-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/11/2017 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 1:09-cv CAP Document 1 Filed 12/21/2009 Page 1 of 14

Case 1:15-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2015 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. v. No. 1:18-cv- COMPLAINT COLLECTIVE ACTION

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 02/10/16 Page 1 of 13 U.S. DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON NO.

From Article at GetOutOfDebt.org

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

2:18-cv DCN Date Filed 01/23/18 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 8

Case: 3:11-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/23/11 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

thejasminebrand.com SO SO DEF PRODUCTIONS, INC., thejasminebrand.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

3:14-cv JFA Date Filed 10/03/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 9

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/01/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

Case 1:19-cv AJN Document 2 Filed 02/25/19 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 4:10-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/18/10 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:14-cv MRH Document 1 Filed 05/27/14 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Case No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/01/17 Page 1 of 23. Plaintiff,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 9:15-cv DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2015 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Hon.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

2:17-cv DCN Date Filed 09/10/17 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 9

Courthouse News Service

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

Case 3:15-cv EDL Document 1 Filed 12/09/15 Page 1 of 16

Attorneys for Plaintiff STEVE THOMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STEVE THOMA

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/01/18 Page 1 of 15

Case 1:18-cv MSK-KMT Document 1 Filed 09/18/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 0:17-cv WPD Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/28/2017 Page 1 of 14

Case 3:10-cv P-BN Document 76 Filed 07/27/11 Page 1 of 11 PageID 995

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiffs, COLLECTIVE AND CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT v. (JURY TRIAL DEMANDED)

Case 2:16-cv GMN-VCF Document 1 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 10

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/05/18 Page 1 of 18

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Civil Action 1:16-cv-1080

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 08/14/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 11 Filed: 04/18/17 Page 1 of 26 PageID #:51

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/26/18 Page 1 of 43 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

INDIVIDUAL, COLLECTIVE, AND CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

7:14-cv TMC Date Filed 10/21/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 13

Transcription:

Case 0:16-cv-63007-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2016 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION RAPHAEL U. ESTEVEZ, CASE NO.: Plaintiff, v. THE FLORIDA PANTHERS HOCKEY CLUB, LTD., Defendant. / COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff, Raphael Estevez ( Estevez ), through his undersigned attorney and pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 7(a)(1), 8(a) and (d), and 11(a) and (b), files this Complaint against the Florida Panthers Hockey Club, Ltd. ( the Panthers ) and alleges the following: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. Estevez brings this action against the Panthers for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act ( FLSA ), 29 U.S.C. 201 et seq., and the Florida Minimum Wage Act ( FMWA ), Fla. Stat. 448.10, and Article X, 24(a) of the Florida Constitution, and acts of discrimination based on a disability, handicap or perceived disability in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, as amended ( ADA ), 42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq., and the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Fla. Stat. 760.01 to 760.11. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 2. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 because this claim involves a federal question arising under federal statutes, specifically, the FLSA and the ADA, and a claim for damages under federal law for a violation of Estevez s civil rights, pursuant to 28 1

Case 0:16-cv-63007-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2016 Page 2 of 11 U.S.C. 1343(a)(4). This Court has supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1367 over state law claims brought pursuant to Fla. Stat. 448.110 and Article X, 24(a) of the Florida Constitution. Venue is proper in the Southern District, Fort Lauderdale Division, because Defendant s corporate headquarters and principal place of business, and all relevant acts and events occurred in Broward County, Florida. PARTIES 3. Estevez was employed by the Panthers for nearly seven (7) years from July 2009 until April 11, 2016. Estevez was employed by the Panthers at all times material to this action. 4. The Panthers is an employer doing business in Broward County, Florida as a professional hockey team. The Panthers at all times relevant to this claim employed more than 15 employees. COMPLIANCE WITH PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS 5. Estevez has complied with the procedural requirements of the FMWA by providing the employer with notice of the violations of this section and his intent to initiate this action. 6. The Panthers violated the FMWA and the Florida Constitution by failing to pay the unpaid wages or to otherwise resolve the claim after receiving notice of the minimum wage violations. 7. Additionally, Estevez timely dual filed a Charge of Discrimination ( Charge ) based on a disability or perceived disability with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ( EEOC ) and the Florida Commission on Human Relations ( FCHR ). Attached as Exhibit A is his Charge. 8. Estevez has complied with the administrative procedures that were conditions precedent to filing this lawsuit. More than 180 days have passed since the filing of the Charge and 2

Case 0:16-cv-63007-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2016 Page 3 of 11 Estevez has obtained a Right to Sue letter from the EEOC. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is his Right to Sue from the EEOC. Therefore, Estevez is permitted to proceed with a civil lawsuit. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 9. Estevez was hired as a part-time employee working as a member of the Panther Patrol/Rat Pack, a group that performs activities during games to boost the energy level of the crowd. 10. Estevez was hired by Pete Soto to become a full-time employee in January 2012. He was assigned to the position of Game Operations/Mascot Coordinator; his primary duty was to act as the team mascot, Stanley Panther. 11. While employed as team mascot, Estevez was initially supervised by Pete Soto. Jon Adams, the Panthers Director of Game Presentation, became Mr. Estevez s supervisor in August or September 2015. 12. During his employment with the Panthers, Estevez was an exemplary employee. Prior to Estevez s disclosure of his disability, he was never disciplined, written up, reprimanded or counseled for his performance or for his actions. 13. Estevez was well respected by his peers, and was considered a good team member that brought enthusiasm and energy to his work. 14. In addition to his performance at Panthers games and events, Estevez made numerous appearances as the team mascot for private events, including but not limited to, birthdays, marketing events and parades. 15. The Panthers failed to compensate Estevez for his appearances at these private events. Estevez was not paid overtime or minimum wage for numerous hours worked engaging in private appearances. 3

Case 0:16-cv-63007-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2016 Page 4 of 11 16. Estevez was paid a salary for all hours worked, and was not paid overtime or minimum wage when he worked more than forty (40) hours in individual work weeks. 17. Estevez worked an average of 210 hours per month from January 2012 through April 2016, which included approximately 1,400 hours of unpaid overtime and/or minimum wages. 18. Estevez was hospitalized at Memorial Regional Hospital in Hollywood, Florida for severe depression on March 10, 2016. 19. Estevez s family called the Panthers Human Resources Manager Peggy Ziady, to inform her that he was unable to continue working that day and that he had left the premises. Later, Estevez s mother called the Panthers to advise of his impending hospitalization. Estevez s account also revealed that he contacted his boss while he was still hospitalized. 20. Additionally, Estevez s former boss, Pete Soto, contacted Estevez s current supervisor, Jon Adams, to inform him that Estevez was hospitalized with a disability. 21. Estevez returned to work on March 16, 2016, but he was still receiving treatment for his medical condition. 22. While he was on medical leave, Estevez missed one of the Panthers games. It was the first time during his employment with the Panthers that he had missed a game. 23. Shortly after returning to work, Estevez met with Ziady and Lane Miller, Vice President of Human Resources, who assured Estevez that his job was not in jeopardy and the Panthers would not retaliate against him due to his medical condition. 24. The day after the meeting with Ziady and Miller, Estevez met with Richard Adler, Executive Vice President of Marketing, and was reassured that the Panthers would not retaliate and his job was not in jeopardy for taking medical leave for a disability. 4

Case 0:16-cv-63007-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2016 Page 5 of 11 25. Estevez made it clear to Ziady, Miller and Adler, three high-ranking managers, that he was still receiving treatment for his disability. 26. However, upon returning to work, Estevez was treated differently from employees who were not disabled or handicapped or perceived or regarded as being disabled or handicapped. 27. The Panthers subjected Estevez to disparate treatment by engaging in the following acts: A. Falsely accusing Estevez of demanding and accepting payment for participating in events for certain season ticket and box office holders. Estevez never at any time accepted money from patrons or fans for performing his duties as the team mascot. B. Falsely accusing Estevez of acts relating to his behavior that did not occur. C. Removing Estevez from the Energy Team, a group of employees that help boost the energy level of fans during hockey games. The Energy Team was supervised by Joelle Kearns, who reported to Andrew Mason, the Game Operations Manager. 28. Estevez was abruptly and unexpectedly terminated on April 11, 2016 for no valid reason. 29. Estevez was told by his supervisors, Adler, Adams, and Miller, that he was being terminated because he allegedly took part in a post-game photograph that was not approved by management, and because of his attitude. 30. The team of managers told Estevez that because of the photograph and his attitude it would be best if we went our separate ways. 31. The allegations used to justify Estevez s termination are not supported by the facts and reflect an intent to terminate Estevez s employment due to a disability or handicap or the employer s perception that Estevez could not perform his job because of a disability or handicap. 5

Case 0:16-cv-63007-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2016 Page 6 of 11 COUNT I Unpaid Overtime and Minimum Wages The Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. 201 et seq. 32. Estevez re-alleges and incorporates by reference into Count I of this Complaint the allegations in paragraphs 1 through 4, and 9 through 17, as if fully stated herein. FLSA. 33. Estevez was an employee as the term is defined by 29 U.S.C. 203(e)(1) of the 34. The Panthers was an employer as defined by 29 U.S.C. 203(d) of the FLSA. 35. The Panthers are an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. 203(s)(1) of the FLSA. 36. At all times during his employment with the Panthers, Estevez was not exempt from the overtime requirements of 29 U.S.C. 207 of the FLSA and 29 C.F.R. 541. 37. At no time during his employment with the Panthers did Estevez meet the requirements of the administrative or professional exemptions, or any other exemptions, of the FLSA or its governing regulations. 38. The Panthers failed to pay Estevez overtime for work weeks in which Estevez worked more than forty (40) hours, in violation of the FLSA. The FLSA required the Panthers to pay Estevez at a rate of one and one-half times his regular rate of pay for each hour worked in excess of forty (40) hours. 39. The Panthers misclassified Estevez as an exempt employee when he should have been classified as non-exempt and entitled to overtime. 40. The Panthers also violated the FLSA by failing to pay Estevez at least minimum wage for all hours worked during his employment. 6

Case 0:16-cv-63007-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2016 Page 7 of 11 41. The Panthers also have violated the record-keeping requirements of the FLSA by failing to maintain records of all time worked by Estevez. 42. Because the Panthers violations of the FLSA were willful, Estevez is entitled to liquidated damages. 43. As a direct and proximate result of the Panthers illegal acts, Estevez has suffered damages, including lost wages and overtime, and has incurred and will continue to incur legal fees and costs. following: WHEREFORE, Estevez respectfully requests that the Court award him damages for the A. Any and all lost wages, including compensation for unpaid overtime and/or minimum wages; B. Liquidated damages in the same amount of the lost wages; C. Reasonable attorney s fees and costs, pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 216(b); and D. Any other relief the Court deems proper. COUNT II Unpaid Minimum Wage The Florida Minimum Wage Act, Fla. Stat. 448.110 and The Florida Constitution, Article X, 24(a) 44. Estevez re-alleges and incorporates by reference into Count II of this Complaint the allegations in paragraphs 1 through 6, 9 through 11, and 14 through 17, as if fully stated herein. 45. The FMWA and the Florida Constitution require employers to pay employees a minimum wage for all hours worked in Florida. Fla. Stat. 448.110(3). The FMWA authorizes an aggrieved person to bring a civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction against an employer for failing to pay minimum wage for all hours worked. 7

Case 0:16-cv-63007-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2016 Page 8 of 11 46. The Panthers violated the FMWA and the Florida Constitution by failing to pay Estevez any compensation for certain hours worked during numerous work weeks. 47. Estevez was an aggrieved person under the FMWA and the Florida Constitution in that from January 2012 through April 11, 2016, he worked an average of 210 hours per month and was not paid for an average of approximately fifty (50) hours per month. 48. Upon prevailing in this action for unpaid minimum wages, Estevez would be entitled to recover the full amount of any unpaid back wages unlawfully withheld plus the same amount as liquidated damages. 49. As a result of the Panthers unlawful actions, Estevez suffered damages, including unpaid wages, and he was forced to incur, and will continue to incur, attorney s fees. WHEREFORE, Estevez requests that the Court award him damages for the following: A. Any and all unpaid back wages; B. Liquidated damages in the same amount as the unpaid wages; C. Reasonable attorney s fees and costs, pursuant to Fla. Stat. 448.110(6)(c)(1) and Fla. Stat. 448.08; and D. Any other relief the Court deems proper. COUNT III Disability/Perceived Disability Discrimination The Americans With Disabilities Act As Amended, 42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq. 50. Estevez re-alleges and incorporates by reference into Count III of this Complaint the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 4, 7 through 14, and 18 through 31, as if fully stated herein. employees. 51. The Panthers at all times relevant to this claim employed more than fifteen (15) 8

Case 0:16-cv-63007-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2016 Page 9 of 11 52. Estevez was disabled in that he had an impairment that substantially limited one or more major life activities, or he was regarded as having such a disability. 53. At all times during his employment with the Panthers, Estevez was a qualified individual in that he was able to perform the essential functions of his job with or without an accommodation. 54. When Estevez returned from medical leave on March 16, 2016, he either had a disability or was regarded as having a disability that the Panthers perceived as rendering him incapable of performing the essential functions of his position. 55. As a result of Estevez s disability or the Panthers perception that he was disabled, Estevez was subjected to discriminatory treatment by the Panthers, which ultimately resulted in his termination from employment. 56. The Panthers discriminated against Estevez on the basis of a disability or a perceived disability by treating him less favorably than employees who were not disabled or perceived as disabled, and by terminating his employment. 57. The Panthers proffered reasons for terminating Estevez were false and nothing more than a pretext for the Panthers discriminatory motives. 58. As a result of the Panthers discriminatory conduct, Estevez has suffered damages, including lost wages, significant emotional distress, and he has incurred, and will continue to incur, attorney s fees. WHEREFORE, Estevez respectfully requests that the Court award him damages for the following: A. Any and all lost wages and benefits; B. Front pay; 9

Case 0:16-cv-63007-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2016 Page 10 of 11 C. Any and all compensatory damages for mental and emotional distress; D. Punitive damages; E. Reasonable attorney s fees and costs; and F. Any other relief the Court deems proper. COUNT IV Handicap/Perceived Handicap Discrimination The Florida Civil Rights Act, Fla. Stat. 760.01-760.11 59. Estevez re-alleges and incorporates by reference into Count IV of this Complaint the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 4, 7 through 14, 18 through 31, as if fully stated herein. 60. Estevez was handicapped in that he had an impairment that substantially limited one or more major life activities, or he was regarded by the Panthers as having such a handicap. 61. At all times during his employment with the Panthers, Estevez was a qualified individual in that he was able to perform the essential functions of his job with or without an accommodation. 62. When Estevez returned from medical leave on March 16, 2016, he either had a handicap or was regarded as having a handicap that the employer perceived as rendering him incapable of performing the essential functions of his job. 63. As a result of Estevez s handicap or the Panthers perception that he had a handicap, Estevez was subjected to discriminatory treatment by the Panthers, which ultimately resulted in his termination from employment. 64. The Panthers discriminated against Estevez on the basis of a handicap or a perceived handicap by treating him less favorably than non-handicapped employees and by terminating his employment. 10

Case 0:16-cv-63007-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2016 Page 11 of 11 65. The Panthers proffered reasons for terminating Estevez and subjecting him to disparate treatment were false and nothing more than a pretext for the Panthers discriminatory motives. WHEREFORE, Estevez requests that the Court award him damages for the following: A. Lost wages and benefits; B. Front pay; C. Compensatory damages for mental and emotional distress; D. Punitive damages; E. Reasonable attorney s fees and costs, pursuant to Fla. Stat. 760.11(5); and F. Any other relief the Court deems proper. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff demands a jury trial on all issues and counts in this Complaint. Respectfully submitted, s/erika Deutsch Rotbart Florida Bar No. 0047686 DEUTSCH ROTBART & ASSOCIATES, P.A. 4755 Technology Way, Suite 106 Boca Raton, Florida 33431 Telephone: (561) 361-8010 Facsimile: (561) 361-8086 E-mail: edrotbart@dralawfirm.com Attorney for Plaintiff 11