Keeping Families Together

Similar documents
Immigration Policy Brief August 2006

Undocumented Immigrants State & Local Tax Contributions. Matthew Gardner Sebastian Johnson Meg Wiehe

Matthew Miller, Bureau of Legislative Research

PERMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC VOTING IN THE UNITED STATES. Member Electronic Vote/ . Alabama No No Yes No. Alaska No No No No

We re Paying Dearly for Bush s Tax Cuts Study Shows Burdens by State from Bush s $87-Billion-Every-51-Days Borrowing Binge

STATE OF ENERGY REPORT. An in-depth industry analysis by the Texas Independent Producers & Royalty Owners Association

2016 Voter Registration Deadlines by State

2008 Changes to the Constitution of International Union UNITED STEELWORKERS

STATE LAWS SUMMARY: CHILD LABOR CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS BY STATE

America is facing an epidemic of the working hungry. Hunger Free America s analysis of federal data has determined:

Federal Rate of Return. FY 2019 Update Texas Department of Transportation - Federal Affairs

Decision Analyst Economic Index United States Census Divisions April 2017

ACCESS TO STATE GOVERNMENT 1. Web Pages for State Laws, State Rules and State Departments of Health

Employment debate in the context of NAFTA. September 2017

American Government. Workbook

TELEPHONE; STATISTICAL INFORMATION; PRISONS AND PRISONERS; LITIGATION; CORRECTIONS; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION ISSUES

Components of Population Change by State

The Electoral College And

How Many Illegal Aliens Currently Live in the United States?

The Victim Rights Law Center thanks Catherine Cambridge for her research assistance.

National State Law Survey: Statute of Limitations 1

WYOMING POPULATION DECLINED SLIGHTLY

Immigrants and the Direct Care Workforce

State & Local Tax Contributions of Young Undocumented Immigrants

New Americans in. By Walter A. Ewing, Ph.D. and Guillermo Cantor, Ph.D.

Women in Federal and State-level Judgeships

THE PROCESS TO RENEW A JUDGMENT SHOULD BEGIN 6-8 MONTHS PRIOR TO THE DEADLINE

Oklahoma, Maine, Migration and Right to Work : A Confused and Misleading Analysis. By the Bureau of Labor Education, University of Maine (Spring 2012)

The remaining legislative bodies have guides that help determine bill assignments. Table shows the criteria used to refer bills.

The Economic Impact of Spending for Operations and Construction by AZA-Accredited Zoos and Aquariums

Campaign Finance E-Filing Systems by State WHAT IS REQUIRED? WHO MUST E-FILE? Candidates (Annually, Monthly, Weekly, Daily).

Legal Representation in Immigration Courts Leads to Better Outcomes, Economic Stability

State Estimates of the Low-income Uninsured Not Eligible for the ACA Medicaid Expansion

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%

Chapter 12: The Math of Democracy 12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment - SOLUTIONS

The Economic Impact of Spending for Operations and Construction in 2014 by AZA-Accredited Zoos and Aquariums

Notice N HCFB-1. March 25, Subject: FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAY PROGRAM OBLIGATION AUTHORITY FISCAL YEAR (FY) Classification Code

The 2,000 Mile Wall in Search of a Purpose: Since 2007 Visa Overstays have Outnumbered Undocumented Border Crossers by a Half Million

2008 Electoral Vote Preliminary Preview

Union Byte By Cherrie Bucknor and John Schmitt* January 2015

Limitations on Contributions to Political Committees

December 30, 2008 Agreement Among the States to Elect the President by National Popular Vote

State Complaint Information

Case 3:15-md CRB Document 4700 Filed 01/29/18 Page 1 of 5

Rhoads Online State Appointment Rules Handy Guide

Complying with Electric Cooperative State Statutes

New data from the Census Bureau show that the nation s immigrant population (legal and illegal), also

NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY Legislative Services Office

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. State Voter Registration and Election Day Laws

The Impact of Ebbing Immigration in Los Angeles: New Insights from an Established Gateway

MEMORANDUM JUDGES SERVING AS ARBITRATORS AND MEDIATORS

PREVIEW 2018 PRO-EQUALITY AND ANTI-LGBTQ STATE AND LOCAL LEGISLATION

12B,C: Voting Power and Apportionment

State Trial Courts with Incidental Appellate Jurisdiction, 2010

For jurisdictions that reject for punctuation errors, is the rejection based on a policy decision or due to statutory provisions?

Delegates: Understanding the numbers and the rules

7-45. Electronic Access to Legislative Documents. Legislative Documents

Campaigns & Elections November 6, 2017 Dr. Michael Sullivan. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GOVT 2305 MoWe 5:30 6:50 MoWe 7 8:30

Registered Agents. Question by: Kristyne Tanaka. Date: 27 October 2010

Class Actions and the Refund of Unconstitutional Taxes. Revenue Laws Study Committee Trina Griffin, Research Division April 2, 2008

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2010 Session

2006 Assessment of Travel Patterns by Canadians and Americans. Project Summary

INSTITUTE of PUBLIC POLICY

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION [NOTICE ] Price Index Adjustments for Contribution and Expenditure Limitations and

Bylaws of the. Student Membership

DREAM Act-Eligible Poised to Build on the Investments Made in Them

Elder Financial Abuse and State Mandatory Reporting Laws for Financial Institutions Prepared by CUNA s State Government Affairs

MEMORANDUM SUMMARY NATIONAL OVERVIEW. Research Methodology:

Growth in the Foreign-Born Workforce and Employment of the Native Born

National Latino Peace Officers Association

Election Notice. FINRA Small Firm Advisory Board Election. September 8, Nomination Deadline: October 9, 2017.

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Map of the Foreign Born Population of the United States, 1900

Should Politicians Choose Their Voters? League of Women Voters of MI Education Fund

More State s Apportionment Allocations Impacted by New Census Estimates; New Twist in Supreme Court Case

Affordable Care Act: A strategy for effective implementation

What is DACA and who are the Dreamers?

Potential Effects of Public Charge Changes on Health Coverage for Citizen Children

NOTICE TO MEMBERS No January 2, 2018

SMALL STATES FIRST; LARGE STATES LAST; WITH A SPORTS PLAYOFF SYSTEM

National Population Growth Declines as Domestic Migration Flows Rise

Red, white, and blue. One for each state. Question 1 What are the colors of our flag? Question 2 What do the stars on the flag mean?

America s s Emerging Demography The role of minorities, college grads & the aging and younging of the population

State-by-State Chart of HIV-Specific Laws and Prosecutorial Tools

POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS. OUT-OF- STATE DONORS. INITIATIVE STATUTE.

Parties and Elections. Selections from Chapters 11 & 12

Election Notice. FINRA Small Firm Advisory Board Election. September 7, Executive Summary. Suggested Routing

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS

Department of Justice

The Changing Face of Labor,

CRS Report for Congress

ADVANCEMENT, JURISDICTION-BY-JURISDICTION

Election Notice. FINRA Small Firm Advisory Board Election. September 2, Nomination Deadline: October 2, 2015.

Millions to the Polls

New Census Estimates Show Slight Changes For Congressional Apportionment Now, But Point to Larger Changes by 2020

Reception and Placement of Refugees in the United States

Offender Population Forecasts. House Appropriations Public Safety Subcommittee January 19, 2012

Soybean Promotion and Research: Amend the Order to Adjust Representation on the United Soybean Board

Appendix 6 Right of Publicity

Role of Clinical Evaluation Professionals in Adult Guardianship Proceedings: Survey of State Statutes

Transcription:

Keeping Families Together Why All Americans Should Care About What Happens to Unauthorized Immigrants By Silva Mathema March 16, 2017 The first month of the Trump presidency was punctuated by a series of antiimmigrant executive orders and implementation memos that resulted in chaos at airports around the world, immigration raids around the country, and a widespread fear among communities. 1 The Trump administration s actions and directives ostensibly target the 11 million unauthorized immigrants who live in the United States, but they will also harm millions of American citizens all across the country who live and work beside these immigrants every day. 2 A new analysis by University of Southern California s Center for the Study of Immigrant Integration, or CSII, and the Center for American Progress shows that millions of people, citizens or otherwise, live in mixed-status families with at least one unauthorized family member in the same household. Undeniably, there is no way to separate immigrants out from the U.S.-born population; there can be no us versus them. The main findings of this brief are as follows: Nationwide, about 16.7 million people in the country have at least one unauthorized family member living with them in the same household. More than 8 million U.S. citizens, of which 1.2 million are naturalized citizens, have at least one unauthorized family member living with them. More than 5.9 million citizen children, U.S. born and naturalized, live with at least one family member who is unauthorized. California, Texas, and Nevada, are the top three states that will be most heavily affected by an anti-immigrant policy because they have the highest percent of U.S.- born population with at least one unauthorized family member living with them. But even states with smaller immigrant populations, such as Nebraska, Arkansas, and Kansas, will also be affected, because they have high percentages of naturalized citizens who have unauthorized family members living in the same household. 1 Center for American Progress Keeping Families Together

For this brief, CSII analyzed the 2010-2014 American Community Survey to estimate the number of family members of unauthorized immigrants based on the methodology from a 2015 CAP report. 3 These estimates are by their nature conservative since they do not include an accounting of the number of family members who do not live in the same household. Millions of people in America have at least one unauthorized family member CSII s analysis shows that 16.7 million people in the country have at least one unauthorized family member living with them in the same household. Moreover, a high share of these individuals nearly 8.2 million people are citizens or naturalized citizens. Of these U.S.-born and naturalized citizens who live with at least one unauthorized family member, 72 percent are children. Therefore, when a policy of enforcement and mass deportation targets the estimated 11 million unauthorized immigrants living in the United States, it also threatens the well-being of millions of citizens and their families, and erodes their trust in their community and the government. TABLE 1 People with at least one unauthorized family member living in their household Population with at least one unauthorized family member in the same household U.S.-born population 5,856,276 1,152,560 7,008,837 Naturalized immigrant population 61,352 1,099,004 1,160,356 Noncitizen immigrant population 226,713 2,351,765 2,578,479 Unauthorized immigrant population 1,036,169 4,950,445 5,986,613 Total population 7,180,510 9,553,774 16,734,285 Note: Noncitizen immigrant population excludes the unauthorized immigrant population. Child refers to people under 18 years of age. The total number of people with at least one unauthorized family member in their household may not add up to the sum of the child and adult population due to rounding. 2 Center for American Progress Keeping Families Together

The states with the most mixed-status households In California, nearly 4.7 million people 12 percent of the state s total population live with an unauthorized family member. Among them, around 2 million, or 42 percent, are children younger than 18 years old. Child s share of unauthorized family members is even higher more than or close to 50 percent in states like Wyoming, South Dakota, and Arizona. New York and New Jersey also have large immigrant populations and a high number of people who have an unauthorized family member living with them. 4 Other less populated states, including Colorado, Nevada, and New Mexico, have a substantial percentage of people living with an unauthorized immigrant family member. TABLE 2 Top 10 states where people live with at least one unauthorized family member in the same household State Total population Population with at least one unauthorized family member living in the same household Percent of total population California 38,366,950 1,967,756 2,691,920 4,659,676 12% Texas 26,196,298 1,232,061 1,437,072 2,669,133 10% Nevada 2,776,601 112,025 142,375 254,400 9% Arizona 6,579,027 226,793 239,254 466,047 7% New Jersey 8,933,251 231,295 373,320 604,615 7% Illinois 12,943,450 342,809 474,257 817,066 6% New York 19,653,424 440,179 774,775 1,214,955 6% New Mexico 2,088,118 55,340 59,991 115,331 6% Colorado 5,210,274 130,958 145,631 276,589 5% Washington 6,917,417 159,875 191,141 351,016 5% Note: Child refers to people under 18 years of age. 3 Center for American Progress Keeping Families Together

Top states where the U.S.-born will be most affected Looking at just the U.S.-born population, California still tops the list with more than 2 million U.S.-born citizens who live with at least one unauthorized family member. Similarly, 57 out of 1,000 U.S.-born persons in Texas and 52 out of 1,000 U.S.-born persons in Nevada live with an unauthorized family member in their household. As mentioned earlier, many of these U.S. citizens are children; the scope of the impact of anti-immigrant policies and actions therefore goes far beyond just the unauthorized immigrants it targets. For example, among the U.S. born people living with at least one unauthorized family member, 91 percent or about 169,700 out of 187,000 people are children in North Carolina, the highest among all states. This percentage is similarly high in other states such as Delaware, Wyoming, Nebraska and Tennessee. TABLE 3 Top 10 states with U.S.-born population living with at least one unauthorized family member in the same household State U.S.-born population U.S.-born population with at least one unauthorized family member living in the same household Per 1,000 U.S.- born citizens California 27,758,102 1,658,456 382,555 2,041,011 74 Texas 21,795,060 1,030,906 211,464 1,242,370 57 Nevada 2,237,454 95,015 22,194 117,210 52 Arizona 5,677,352 191,125 41,116 232,241 41 Illinois 11,089,138 289,291 54,241 343,532 31 New Jersey 6,973,751 176,955 27,991 204,946 29 New Mexico 1,871,448 44,374 9,694 54,068 29 Colorado 4,689,633 109,427 18,155 127,582 27 New York 15,180,903 344,807 65,717 410,525 27 Washington 5,982,267 129,014 22,195 151,209 25 Note: Child refers to people under 18 years of age. 4 Center for American Progress Keeping Families Together

Top states where naturalized citizens will be highly affected The group of states whose naturalized citizens will be most affected are quite different. States such as Nebraska, Arkansas, and Kansas, which are generally not considered immigrant-heavy states, top the list of states with the highest percentages of naturalized citizens who live with at least one unauthorized family member in the same household. The different spread of states in this analysis shows that the effect of an anti-immigration policy is not just limited to bigger states, such as California and New York. Rather, the effect is more expansive and will also affect smaller states that may not have a high immigrant population. TABLE 4 Top 10 states with naturalized immigrant population living with at least one unauthorized family member in the same household State Naturalized immigrant population Naturalized immigrant population with at least one unauthorized family member living in the same household Percent of naturalized immigrant population Nebraska 43,189 509 4,264 4,773 11% Arkansas 40,686 280 3,642 3,922 10% Kansas 70,602 531 5,664 6,195 9% Texas 1,443,580 6,645 119,534 126,179 9% Idaho 33,576 90 2,825 2,915 9% Hawaii 137,743 826 10,804 11,629 8% Utah 85,477 639 6,440 7,078 8% Nevada 232,730 958 17,584 18,542 8% Oklahoma 69,060 230 4,877 5,107 7% Colorado 195,445 1,207 12,916 14,123 7% Note: Child refers to people under 18 years of age. The importance of family in immigration enforcement Recent immigration raids have resulted in arrests of more than 600 immigrants in one week from across at least 11 states, from California to Indiana and Georgia to New York. 5 This wide net has swept up people from all walks of life. A mother of two citizen children, Guadalupe García de Rayos, who had reported to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, every year since she was swept up in a raid by the notorious former Maricopa County, Arizona, Sheriff Joe Arpaio, was deported to Mexico and separated from her children. 6 There are reports of people being arrested in their homes, outside schools, and outside churches. 7 These are the real world consequences of the mass deportation plan currently being rolled out. 5 Center for American Progress Keeping Families Together

Deporting a family member, especially a parent, has serious detrimental impacts on children. In addition to the loss of a parent and the immeasurable security that comes with having a stable family, deportations often leave children in the foster care system. 8 Fathers, in many immigrant families, are often the bread winners, and are more often detained or deported. 9 Removals can therefore result in a large number of single mothers left behind to care and provide for the family. Research shows that, when their parents have been deported, children go through multiple negative experiences: They suffer from psychological trauma, especially when they witness a parent s arrest; their family is separated; and they are likely to experience housing insecurity and economic instability. 10 The threat of deportation alone is enough to break apart communities and cause high levels of stress in families. Research shows that immigrants who fear deportation avoid public spaces and interaction with police officers. 11 In areas that see more immigration enforcement, unauthorized immigrants are fearful of driving, accessing much-needed health care, or even doing something as mundane as walking down the street. This erosion of trust makes the entire community vulnerable because people are fearful of reporting crimes, coming out as witnesses, or reporting domestic violence abuses. Apart from the harm to families and communities, there is an undeniable economic argument for having sensible immigration policies. A 2016 CAP report found that removing 7 million unauthorized workers will result in a loss of $4.7 trillion in gross domestic product, over a decade, and a loss of $900 billion in federal government revenues over the same time period. 12 Individual states and industries will also suffer from losing unauthorized workers from their workforce. 13 Additionally, removing unauthorized immigrants means the national and individual states will forgo $11.74 billion each year in state and local taxes that unauthorized immigrants already pay into the systems through sales and excise, personal income, and property taxes. 14 A focus on keeping families together rather than a relentless focus on ramping up enforcement would be a better, pragmatic solution to the issues facing immigration policy in the United States. Silva Mathema is a Senior Policy Analyst for the Immigration team at the Center for American Progress. The author would like to thank Manuel Pastor, Justin Scoggins, and Alejandro Sanchez- Lopez at the University of Southern California s Center for the Study of Immigrant Integration for providing the analysis for this brief. 6 Center for American Progress Keeping Families Together

Endnotes 1 The White House, Executive Order: Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements, Press release, January 25, 2017, available at https://www.whitehouse. gov/the-press-office/2017/01/25/executive-order-bordersecurity-and-immigration-enforcement-improvements; The White House, Executive Order: Protecting the Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into The United States, Press release, January 27, 2017, available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/ the-press-office/2017/01/27/executive-order-protectingnation-foreign-terrorist-entry-united-states; Joanna Walters, Trump s travel ban: stories of those who were detained this weekend, The Guardian, January 31, 2017, available at https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/31/ people-detained-airports-trump-travel-ban; Liz Robbins and Caitlin Dickerson, Immigration Agents Arrest 600 People Across U.S. in One Week, The New York Times, February 12, 2017, available at https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/12/ nyregion/immigration-arrests-sanctuary-city.html. 2 Migration Policy Institute, Profile of the Unauthorized Population: United States, available at http://www. migrationpolicy.org/data/unauthorized-immigrantpopulation/state/us (last accessed February 2017). 3 Families are defined as two or more people living in the same household who are related by blood or marriage. Author s analysis of estimates by the Center for the Study of Immigrant Integration using Steven Ruggles and others, Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, American Community Survey 2010 2014 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 2015), available at https://usa.ipums.org/usa/ based on methodology from Manuel Pastor, Tom Jawetz, and Lizet Ocampo, DAPA Matters: The Growing Electorate Directly Affected by Executive Action on Immigration (Washington: Center for American Progress, 2015), available at https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/immigration/ report/2015/11/19/125787/dapa-matters/. 4 For more information on immigrant populations see Pew Research Center, Statistical Portrait of the Foreign-Born Population in the United States, available at http://www. pewhispanic.org/2016/04/19/statistical-portrait-of-theforeign-born-population-in-the-united-states/ph_2016_ stat-portrait-fb-current-45/ (last accessed February 2017). 5 Robbins and Dickerson, Immigration Agents Arrest 600 People Across U.S. in One Week. 6 Griselda Nevarez, Arizona woman deported to Mexico despite complying with immigration officials, The Guardian, February 9, 2017, available at https://www.theguardian. com/us-news/2017/feb/09/arizona-guadalupe-garcia-derayos-deported-protests. 7 Arelis R. Hernández, Wesley Lowery, and Abigail Hauslohner, Federal immigration raids net many without criminal records, sowing fear, The Washington Post, February 16, 2017, available at https://www.washingtonpost. com/national/federal-immigration-raids-net-manywithout-criminal-records-sowing-fear/2017/02/16/ a37e5e76-f486-11e6-a9b0-ecee7ce475fc_story.html?utm_ term=.424fffd835ef. 8 Joanna Dreby, How Today s Immigration Enforcement Policies Impact Children, Families, and Communities (Washington: Center for American Progress, 2012), available at https://www.americanprogress.org/wp-content/ uploads/2012/08/drebyimmigrationfamiliesfinal.pdf. 9 Randy Capps and others, Implications of Immigration Enforcement Activities for the Well-Being of Children in Immigrant Families: A Review of the Literature (Washington: Migration Policy Institute, 2015), available at http://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/implicationsimmigration-enforcement-activities-well-being-childrenimmigrant-families. 10 Ibid. 11 Dreby, How Today s Immigration Enforcement Policies Impact Children, Families, and Communities ; Capps and others, Implications of Immigration Enforcement Activities for the Well-Being of Children in Immigrant Families: A Review of the Literature. 12 Ryan Edwards and Francesc Ortega, The Economic Impacts of Removing Unauthorized Immigrant Workers (Washington: Center for American Progress, 2016), available at https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/immigration/ reports/2016/09/21/144363/the-economic-impacts-ofremoving-unauthorized-immigrant-workers/. 13 Center for American Progress Immigration Team and Andrew Lomax, Removing Unauthorized Workers Harms States and Industries Across the Country (2016), available at https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/immigration/ news/2016/09/21/143408/removing-unauthorized-workersharms-states-and-industries-across-the-country/. 14 Institute of Taxation and Economic Policy, Undocumented Immigrants State and Local Tax Contributions (2017), available at http://www.itep.org/immigration/. 7 Center for American Progress Keeping Families Together