Case: 1:10-cr SL Doc #: 898 Filed: 06/04/12 1 of 5. PageID #: 18606

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. v. HON. NANCY G. EDMUNDS

2:10-cr NGE-MKM Doc # 295 Filed 03/25/13 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 4602 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case: 2:13-cr MHW-TPK Doc #: 56 Filed: 08/28/14 Page: 1 of 7 PAGEID #: 368

Case 2:05-cr RBP-TMP Document 1117 Filed 08/29/13 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No In re: MARTIN MCNULTY,

Case 2:10-cr MHT -WC Document 833 Filed 03/29/11 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Case 2:12-cr TJS Document 11 Filed 07/02/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Case: 1:06-cv SL Doc #: 266 Filed: 08/23/10 1 of 5. PageID #: 8484

Case 1:09-mj JMF Document 3 Filed 01/12/2009 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PLEA AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

Case: 5:14-cr JRA Doc #: 83 Filed: 02/07/15 1 of 5. PageID #: 611

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CR-ZLOCH/ROSENBAUM CASE NO CR-ZLOCH/ROSENBAUM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. v. : CRIMINAL NO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PLEA AGREEMENT

INTRODUCTION TO THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA RESPONDENT'S ANSWER BRIEF ON THE MERITS

Case 8:12-cr JLS Document 87 Filed 09/14/17 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:288

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:10-cr LEK Document 425 Filed 08/21/12 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1785 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Case 5:17-cr JLV Document 46 Filed 10/02/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 131 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT* Before GORSUCH, SEYMOUR, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division

Case 1:10-cr LEK Document 393 Filed 06/04/12 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1524

Case 1:05-cr RBW Document 387 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 1 of 10 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division PLEA AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

Follow this and additional works at:

case 3:04-cr AS document 162 filed 09/01/2005 page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION

PLEA AGREEMENT THOMAS QUINN

Case: 1:03-cr Document #: 205 Filed: 10/06/10 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:535

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 5:17-cr JLV Document 51 Filed 10/23/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 221 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA

Case 5:09-cr JHS Document 31 Filed 07/23/10 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case: Document: Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/28/ UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:18-cr TSE Document 93 Filed 06/22/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 1738

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT APPELLANT S MOTION FOR RELEASE PENDING APPEAL

2:13-mj DUTY Doc # 16 Filed 08/13/13 Pg 1 of 13 Pg ID 256 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

CASE 0:10-cr JNE -XXX Document 246 Filed 12/31/10 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Case 2:15-cr FMO Document 52 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:295

Attorneys for the United States UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:04-cr JAH Document 309 Filed 01/17/13 PageID.1104 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 3:11-cr DRD Document 22 Filed 03/15/11 Page 1 of 14

No SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. Joseph Jones, Desmond Thurston, and Antuwan Ball Petitioner- Appellants,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. Plaintiff, Defendants.

Case 1:17-cr TSE Document 216 Filed 06/15/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 1545 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Case 3:10-cr FDW Document 3 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 7

Follow this and additional works at:

Case 1:18-cr TSE Document 304 Filed 10/17/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 6635

Case 1:17-cr RC Document 3 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 10. United States v. Michael T. Flynn

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA EASTERN DIVISION

ORDER ON ARRAIGNMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, ARRAIGNMENT AND PLEA HEARING Monday, January 26, 2009

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL NO. 1:04CV46 (1:01CR45 & 3:01CR11-3)

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/26/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1

Case3:11-cr WHA Document40 Filed08/08/11 Page1 of 10

MOTION FOR RELEASE PENDING APPEAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

moves this Court for an order for the Disclosure of the Grand Jury Transcripts. This

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PRETRIAL SERVICES AGENCY

Case 1:15-cr CG-B Document 243 Filed 11/09/15 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:18-cr JPS Filed 03/12/18 Page 1 of 16 Document 3

The United States of America, by and through JULIE BURNHAM. PORTER, Attorney for the United States, Acting Under Authority Conferred

USA v. Kelin Manigault

Case 1:18-cr Document 16 Filed 02/27/18 Page 1 of 3 PageID# 150 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES PROPOSED VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS

Background. The Defendant. 1. From in or around 2007 through in or around January 2017,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) CRIMINAL ACTION NO.

Case 2:17-cr JAK Document 25 Filed 05/15/18 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:80

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT FULTON COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. F Trial Court No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff, Defendant.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION. vs. CASE NO. xxxxx SENTENCING MEMORANDUM

Case: 1:12-cr Document #: 133 Filed: 09/11/14 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:733

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION. Criminal No. 5:06-CR-136-1D Civil No.

DONALD SCOTT TAYLOR, is convicted of one or both of the capital offenses relating

(A) subject to the condition that the person not commit a Federal, State, or local crime during the period of release

USA v. Adriano Sotomayer

BEFORE THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ON GRIEVANCES AND DISCIPLINE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

United States Court of Appeals

Case 8:14-cr JLS Document 222 Filed 10/16/18 Page 1 of 13 Page ID #:3854

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

WORKSHEET A OFFENSE LEVEL

United States of America,

Pretrial release. A. Hearing. (1) Time. If a case is initiated in the district court, and the conditions of release have not been set by the

Case 5:14-cr Document 589 Filed 04/07/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 15273

Case 3:17-cr RBL Document 8 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 10 FILED. LDOOED,RECEIVED JUL

Transcription:

Case: 1:10-cr-00387-SL Doc #: 898 Filed: 06/04/12 1 of 5. PageID #: 18606 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CASE NO. 1:10CR387 Plaintiff, JUDGE SARA LIOI v. GOVERNMENT S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT GABOR S MOTION FOR RELEASE FROM DETENTION PENDING SENTENCING JAMES C. DIMORA, et al., Defendants. Now comes the United States of America, by and through its attorneys, Barbara L. McQuade, United States Attorney, and Assistant United States Attorneys Antoinette T. Bacon, Nancy L. Kelley, and Ann C. Rowland and hereby responds to Defendant Gabor s Motion for Release from Custody (Doc. 893. This Court previously found, pursuant to Title 18, Section 3143, United States Code, that Defendant Gabor failed to meet his burden by clear and convincing evidence that he is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the community. 18 U.S.C. 3143(a(1, provides: (a(1 Except as provided in paragraph (2, the judicial officer shall order that a person who has been found guilty of an offense and who is awaiting imposition or execution of sentence be detained, unless the judicial officer finds by clear and convincing evidence that the person is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of any other person or the community if released under section 3142(b or (c.

Case: 1:10-cr-00387-SL Doc #: 898 Filed: 06/04/12 2 of 5. PageID #: 18607 Defendant Gabor now asks this Court to conduct another hearing on this issue. In his motion, Defendant Gabor previews the arguments he would make at a hearing on this Motion: (1 that he has strong ties to the community; (2 that he continues to maintain his innocence, and (3 that he is not a danger to the community as evidenced by the fact that no acts of violence were alleged as part of the criminal conduct. At the time the Court made its prior determination, the Court was well aware of Defendant Gabor s ties to the community; that he maintained his innocence by asserting his right to a jury trial and that the indictment and trial testimony did not allege any acts of violence. Having that information in mind, the Court ordered pre-sentencing detention. Nothing in Defendant Gabor s Motion warrants a hearing. This Court should continue to order Gabor detained without further hearing. Gabor also cites to his prior compliance with pretrial services. While prior to trial he was presumed innocent, Gabor is now facing a considerable prison sentence. As this Court recognized in an order denying co-defendant Dimora s release on bond: It is not unusual for persons seeking pre-sentence release to point to their compliance with pre-trial release orders as evidence that they will appear for sentencing. United States v. Hanhardt, 173 F. Supp. 2d 801, 806 (N.D. Ill. 2001 (emphasis in original, rev'd in part on other grounds, 361 F.3d 382 (7th Cir. 2004. The argument is routinely rejected because prior to trial there is the possibility of no imprisonment, which evaporates upon a finding of guilt. Id. (citing United States v. Manso-Portes, 838 F.2d 889 (7th Cir. 1987. See also United States v. Jinwright, No. 3:09CR67-W, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85677, at *18 (W.D.N.C. July 23, 2010 ( Something has changed since trial; Defendant is no longer presumed innocent but is guilty of the counts of conviction. His legal status has changed, increasing his incentive to flee.. (Doc. 867 at 7-8. 2

Case: 1:10-cr-00387-SL Doc #: 898 Filed: 06/04/12 3 of 5. PageID #: 18608 On or about May 10, 2012, the Government provided to the United States Probation Officer, with copies to defense counsel, the Government s estimation of the potential Guidelines range for Defendant Gabor. The Government wrote as follows: Similarly, Defendant Gabor s underlying convictions related to fraud, bribery and obstruction, which group under 3D1.2. In the government s view, the following is a correct application of the United States Sentencing Guidelines for Michael Gabor: Base Offense Level 14 2C1.1(a More than One Bribe 2 2C1.1(b(1 Offense Involved Elected Official 4 2C1.1(b(3 Amount of the bribe, value of the benefit conferred or to be conferred, loss or anticipated loss to the government (>$120,000 to >$400,000 1 10-14 2C1.1(b(2& 2B1.1(b(1 Obstruction of Justice 2 3C1.1 Total Offense Level 32-36 Approximately two weeks after learning that he faces the high sentence calculated above, Defendant Gabor filed the instant motion seeking release pending sentencing. Defendant Gabor 1 The Government will provide information to the Court at sentencing that details the loss amounts based on all three factors in U.S.S.G. 2C1.1(b(2, for the Court s determination of the appropriate loss figure in this case. The Government believes that the lowest amount attributable to Defendant Gabor would exceed $120,000 and the highest amount would exceed $400,000. If the Court found that Gabor should be responsible for the loss of the entire RICO conspiracy (see 2E1.1(a(2, the loss could be greater. 3

Case: 1:10-cr-00387-SL Doc #: 898 Filed: 06/04/12 4 of 5. PageID #: 18609 has not established by clear and convincing evidence that he does not pose a flight risk and is not a danger to the community. Nothing in Defendant s motion merits a hearing on the matter. Respectfully submitted, Eric H. Holder, Jr. Attorney General of the United States Barbara L. McQuade United States Attorney Eastern District of Michigan By: /s/ Antoinette T. Bacon Antoinette T. Bacon (DC: 474696 Nancy L. Kelley (OH: 0020071 Ann C. Rowland (OH: 0015156 Assistant U. S. Attorneys 801 West Superior Avenue, Suite 400 Cleveland, Ohio 44308 (216 622-3966 (216 522-2403 (facsimile E-mail: Nancy.Kelley@usdoj.gov E-mail: Antoinette.T.Bacon@usdoj.gov E-mail: Ann.Rowland@usdoj.gov 4

Case: 1:10-cr-00387-SL Doc #: 898 Filed: 06/04/12 5 of 5. PageID #: 18610 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on this date, a copy of the foregoing was filed electronically. Notice of this filing will be sent by operation of the Court s electronic filing system to all parties indicated on the electronic filing receipt. All other parties will be served by regular U.S. mail. Parties may access this filing through the Court s system. /s/antoinette T. Bacon Antoinette T. Bacon Assistant U.S. Attorney 5