California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Ben Lomond Conservation Camp, CC#45

Similar documents
Santa Cruz County Mental Health Advisory Board. Honoring Commitments to the Public Review of Grand Jury Report Responses

Santa Cruz County District Attorney. Very Civil Asset Forfeiture in Santa Cruz County

Marin Chapter California Civil Grand Jurors Association

Santa Cruz County Clerk. Every Vote Counts

Modoc County Grand Jury Report

EL DORADO COUNTY GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT

Detention Facilities in Orange County

Review of Orange County Detention Facilities

Reducing Prison Overcrowding in California

AB 109 and Prop 47 County Public Planning

PART III - CALIFORNIA PENAL CODES

PLUMAS COUNTY GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT

RALPH COLEMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, NO. 2:90-cv-0520 LKK DAD (PC) THREE-JUDGE COURT. EDMUND G. BROWN JR., et al., Defendants. MARCIANO PLATA, et al.

SAN DIEGO CITY SCHOOL WEBSITE

GRAND JURY REPORT

ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION AND THE DETENTION SYSTEM A Growing Concern

ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY

Overcrowding Alternatives

San Joaquin County Grand Jury SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY. JAIL GRIEVENCES Denied or Not Denied Case No. 0913

SB 618 Eligibility. County of San Diego

CENTER ON JUVENILE AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE

The Superior Court GRAND JURY RELEASES REPORT ON SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY JAIL GRIEVANCES

Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 1308

For Informational Purposes (916) July 15, 2011

Alameda County Public Defender

2018/2019 Orange County Grand Jury Application Superior Court of California, County of Orange

(1) Correctional facility means a facility operated by or under contract with the department.

ORANGE COUNTY GRAND JURY

County Parole Board Report of the San Francisco Civil Grand Jury SUMMARY The Civil Grand Jury (CGJ) reviewed the County Parole Board, a

CONTRABAND CONTROL AND SEARCHES

Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Action Minutes Monday, May 11, :30 p.m.

Unfinished Business: Responses to Orange County Grand Jury Reports

2015/2016 Orange County Grand Jury Application Superior Court of California, County of Orange

CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE SECTION & 3003(g)[restrictions] W&I [restrictions]

THE CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY A Time to Come Together

AUDIT FOLLOW-UP MEMORANDUM

SAN FRANCISCO EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES AGENCY CERTIFICATE/LICENSE DISCIPLINE PROCESS FOR PREHOSPITAL PERSONNEL

TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note

LATE NIGHT/EARLY MORNING RELEASE

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Incarceration Fiscal Note

Inmate Visitation Policy at the Yolo County Monroe Detention Center

(631) FAX: (631) TDD: (631)

Chapter 33. (CalECPA)

UNANSWERED QUESTIONS: The Los Angeles Sheriff s Proposed Implementation of ICE s Priority Enforcement Program. September 29, 2015

RESOLUTION NO

As Introduced. 132nd General Assembly Regular Session S. B. No

**READ CAREFULLY** L.A County Sheriff s Civilian Oversight Commission Ordinance Petition Instructions

Chapter 148. State Prison System. Article 1. Organization and Management Repealed by Session Laws 1973, c. 1262, s. 10.

PRISON LAW OFFICE General Delivery, San Quentin, CA Telephone (510) Fax (510)

County of Santa Clara Office of the District Attorney

NEVADA CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT PROPERTY AND EVIDENCE OPERATION

NC General Statutes - Chapter 148 Article 3 1

PRISON LAW OFFICE General Delivery, San Quentin, CA Telephone (510) Fax (510)

OPERATIONS ORDER. Releases

GRAND JURY REPORT JULY 2018 TERM

Memphis Police Department

FELONY SENTENCING AFTER REALIGNMENT

Cherokee County Fire & Emergency Services

Prince William County 2004 Adult Detention Services SEA Report

Secretary of the Senate. Chief Clerk of the Assembly. Private Secretary of the Governor

Criminal Justice Public Safety and Individual Rights

PRISON LAW OFFICE. General Delivery, San Quentin CA Telephone (510) Fax (510)

PRISON LAW OFFICE General Delivery, San Quentin, CA Telephone (510) Fax (510)

County Detention: Proposed Mental Health Facility & Immigration Enforcement Policies Fact Sheet

GRAND JURY REPORT Riverside County Sheriff-Coroner s Review

EL DORADO COUNTY CHARTER. Birthplace of the Gold Rush

PRISON LAW OFFICE General Delivery, San Quentin, CA Telephone (510) Fax (510)

Case3:01-cv TEH Document2826 Filed12/01/14 Page1 of 2

FY 2007 targets for key goals of this service area, as established in the FY 2007 Adopted Budget, are shown below.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2009 HOUSE BILL 1403 RATIFIED BILL

PRISON LAW OFFICE General Delivery, San Quentin, CA Telephone (510) Fax (510)

NC Final Biennium Budget Summary

Section 1 - Are You Eligible?

State Inmate Cost Study for Calendar Year 2015 Executive Summary

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

Corrections Division Policy and Procedure Manual Mendocino County Sheriff's Office

DESCHUTES COUNTY ADULT JAIL L. Shane Nelson, Sheriff Jail Operations Approved by: March 10, 2016 TIME COMPUTATION

SENATE BILL No February 14, 2017

HEALTH INFORMATION ACT

EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICES ACT

Immigration Violations

EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICES (INTERIM) REGULATION

ILLINOIS ASSOCIATION OF FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS ANNUAL CONFERENCE 2017 LEGISLATIVE UPDATE

Technical Assistance. Local Reform in a Realigned Environment Data driven strategies to enhance public safety

Criminal Records Checks for Prospective Foster and Adoptive Families

DESCHUTES COUNTY ADULT JAIL L. Shane Nelson, Sheriff Jail Operations Approved by: March 22, 2016 FORCED RELEASES

INDEPENDENT SPECIAL DISTRICT SELECTION COMMITTEE OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY RULES OF PROCEDURE

NC General Statutes - Chapter 90 Article 1B 1

City and County of San Francisco. Office of the Controller City Services Auditor. City Services Benchmarking Report: Jail Population

Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed February 11, Case No

RESPONSE TO GRAND JURY REPORT CAL FIRE/RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT

DESCHUTES COUNTY ADULT JAIL L. Shane Nelson, Sheriff Jail Operations Approved by: February 9, 2016 CRIMINAL ACTS

Florida Senate (PROPOSED COMMITTEE BILL) SPB 7052 FOR CONSIDERATION By the Committee on Criminal Justice

PRISON LAW OFFICE General Delivery, San Quentin, CA Telephone (510) Fax (510)

HOUSE BILL NO. HB0094. Sponsored by: Joint Judiciary Interim Committee A BILL. for. AN ACT relating to criminal justice; amending provisions

Chapter 16: Expanding the Pilot Program that Assists Indigent Inmates After Release

DEBRA BOWEN I SECRETARY OF STATE

California Code of Regulations, Title 15, Division 3, Adult Institutions, Programs and Parole

Transcription:

California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Ben Lomond Conservation Camp, CC#45 2016-2017 Santa Cruz County Civil Grand Jury Findings and Recommendations

Page 2 of 6 Enclosed are the findings and recommendations as requested by the Santa Cruz Grand Jury for Ben Lomond Conservation Camp, CC#45 for the fiscal year 2016-2017. Findings When asked about program effectiveness and measurements of success locally, staff was unable to provide scorecards, analytics, or follow-up information on recidivism or success. This impacts their programs and future funding. X AGREE PARTIALLY Response explanation: Captain Snyder, Camp Liaison with the Department of Adult Institutions confirmed CDCR does not measure the success of inmates once they parole. AB109 prison realignment is making it difficult to maintain adequate firefighting crews at Ben Lomond Conservation Camp. X AGREE PARTIALLY Response explanation: Proposition 47 as well as Proposition 57 has had an impact but the Department is diligent in screening and processing inmates in order to keep our conservation camps at adequate population levels. The county "Boarder Program" at the Ben Lomond Conservation Camp is less costly to the county than housing inmates in the county jail system. X AGREE PARTIALLY Response explanation: The Santa Cruz County Jail provided the following cost analysis: The cost to book an inmate into the jail is $427.08. The cost to keep an inmate in jail is $165.97 per day. Ben Lomond Conservation Camp houses inmates for the county for $10 per day. CDCR can house the inmates for less than the county jail. However, this is dependent on if the inmate actually makes it through the Physical Fitness Training (PFT) and Fire Fighter Training (FFT) where the savings can begin to add up.

Page 3 of 6 There is significantly less programming at Ben Lomond Conservation Camp than in the other facilities that we visited, which may impact inmates' post-release success. AGREE X PARTIALLY Response explanation: This facility should not be compared directly with the local facilities in the Santa Cruz region as this is a State Facility and its primary mission is to staff Fire Crews which provides a vocational benefit. The Department is expanding additional programs. The camp offers ANNA and religious programing. The remote location of the Ben Lomond Conservation Camp impacts emergency medical services for inmates and staff. Current county medical protocol does not allow staff on site to store or administer Narcan or Epinephrine. AGREE X PARTIALLY Response explanation: Narcan can be purchased over the counter and is administered through the nasal passages. CDCR staff can now perform this task. Epinephrine requires a prescription for the patient, of which cannot be stored at camp. The Fall Creek and Bonny Doon Volunteers Fire Station is 6.1 miles from the facility. However, the closest ambulance service is located in Boulder Creek. All Ben Lomond Fire Captains are currently trained as Emergency Medical Technicians (EMT) while some are Paramedics however they are certified in other counties.

Page 4 of 6 Recommendations R7. Law enforcement should create, use, and publish scorecards to measure the local success of inmate programs. (F7) HAS BEEN IMPLEMENTED X REQUIRES FURTHER ANALYSIS-(not to exceed six months) Response explanation, summary, and timeframe: We agree with recommendation. Recommendations can be made to our headquarters. However, it would require many levels of review and consideration before implementation at the State level. R8 & R9. The Sheriff needs to be proactive with placing Boarders, qualified inmates from the county jail system, at the fire camp when appropriate. (F8, F9) X HAS BEEN IMPLEMENTED REQUIRES FURTHER ANALYSIS (not to exceed six months) Response explanation, summary, and timeframe: The Sheriff's office has been proactive in evaluating classification of inmates in search of qualified individuals. R10. CDCR should provide in-person help with GED studies to benefit Ben Lomond Fire Camp inmates. (F10) HAS BEEN IMPLEMENTED X REQUIRES FURTHER ANALYSIS (not to exceed six months) Response explanation, summary, and timeframe: The California Correctional Center's Education Department provides college correspondence courses to inmates at the more remote camps. There are five (5) designated camps that have on-site education classes where inmates can get their GED. Inmates desiring to obtain their GED are housed at these specific camps. Those taking correspondence courses at other camps and are at the point of testing for their GED can be transferred just for the testing.

Page 5 of 6 R11. Narcan nasal spray and epinephrine auto-injectors should be available, along with training on when and how to use them. (F11) HAS BEEN IMPLEMENTED X REQUIRES FURTHER ANALYSIS (not to exceed six months) Response explanation, summary, and timeframe: Narcan nasal spray can be purchased as an over the counter medication and is administered through the nasal passages. CDCR staff is now able to keep this type of medication at camp and perform this task. Epinephrine is still requires a prescription. The current level of scope of our practicing Emergency Medical Technicians prohibits the administration of this type of medication.

Page 6 of 6 Penal Code 933.05 1. For Purposes of subdivision (b) of 933, as to each Grand Jury finding, the responding person or entity shall indicate one of the following: the respondent agrees with the finding, the respondent disagrees wholly or partially with the finding, in which case the response shall specify the portion of the finding that is disputed and shall include an explanation of the reasons therefor. 2. For purpose of subdivision (b) of 933, as to each Grand Jury recommendation, the responding person shall report one of the following actions: the recommendation has been implemented, with a summary regarding the implemented action, the recommendation has not yet been implemented but will be implemented in the future, with a timeframe for implementation, the recommendation requires further analysis, with an explanation and the scope and parameters of an analysis or study, and a timeframe for the matter to be prepared for discussion by the officer or director of the agency or department being investigated or reviewed, including the governing body of the public agency when applicable. This timeframe shall not exceed six months from the date of the publication of the Grand Jury report, or the recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not reasonable, with an explanation therefor. 3. However, if a finding or recommendation of the Grand Jury addresses budgetary or personnel matters of a County department headed by an elected officer, both the department head and the Board of Supervisors shall respond if requested by the Grand Jury, but the response of the Board of Supervisors shall address only those budgetary or personnel matters over which it has some decision-making authority. The response of the elected department head shall address all aspects of the findings or recommendations affecting his or her department. 4. A Grand Jury may request a subject person or entity to come before the Grand Jury for the purpose of reading and discussing the findings of the Grand Jury report that relates to that person or entity in order to verify the accuracy of the findings prior to their release. 5. During an investigation, the Grand Jury shall meet with the subject of that investigation regarding that investigation unless the court, either on its own determination or upon request of the foreperson of the Grand Jury, determines that such a meeting would be detrimental. 6. A Grand Jury shall provide to the affected agency a copy of the portion of the Grand Jury report relating to that person or entity two working days prior to its public release and after the approval of the presiding judge. No officer, agency, department, or governing body of a public agency shall disclose any contents of the report prior to the public release of the final report.

Subject: Ben Lomond Grand Jury Tour March 30, 2017 From: Mendonca, David@CDCR - To: grandjury@scgrandjury.org - Date: October 10, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Attachments: image001.jpg CC#45 GRAND JURY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.PDF Good evening Rocco, I thought I sent this the other day but didn t hear anything regarding the need to submit a hard copy to the Grand Jury. Is this enough or do you want the hard copy delivered? Thank you, D. R. Mendonca Correc.onal Lieutenant Ben Lomond CC#45 831-423-1652 831-427-4859 (fax) 530-310-1121 (cell)