Life in Exile: Burmese Refugees along the Thai-Burma Border

Similar documents
Thailand Burma Border Consortium Strategic Plan (Reviewed & revised, Jan 2012)

THAILAND. Overview. Operational highlights

2017 Year-End report. Operation: Yemen 23/7/2018. edit ( 7/23/2018 Yemen

Overview of UNHCR s operations in Asia and the Pacific

Cultural Orientation Resource Center, Center for Applied Linguistics Overseas CO Program Highlight. Refugees from Burma, served by IRC RSC East Asia

THAILAND Handicap International Federal Information Thailand Country Card EN. Elise Cartuyvels

Informal Consultative Meeting on Global Strategic Priorities for

THAILAND. Overview. Working environment. People of concern

Thailand. Main objectives. Impact

ENSURING PROTECTION FOR ALL PERSONS OF CONCERN TO UNHCR, with priority given to:

IDPs 1 200, ,000. Tibetan refugees (settled) Mandate urban refugees/asylumseekers

KENYA. The majority of the refugees and asylum-seekers in Kenya live in designated camps. Overcrowded

4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Final Report. Resettlement Program. Output 2C: Sustainable Solutions to the Displaced People Situation along the Thai-Myanmar Border.

TBC Strategy

REFUGEES ECHO FACTSHEET. Humanitarian situation. Key messages. Facts & Figures. Page 1 of 5

THAILAND: Strengthening Protection Capacity Project Matrix

INSTRUCTOR VERSION. Persecution and displacement: Sheltering LGBTI refugees (Nairobi, Kenya)

2017 Year-End report. Operation: Syrian Arab Republic 23/7/2018. edit (

JOINT STATEMENT Thailand: Implement Commitments to Protect Refugee Rights End detention, forcible returns of refugees

summary and recommendations June 2012 Human Rights Watch 1

4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Invisible In Thailand: Documenting the Need for International Protection for Burmese

LIVING IN LIMBO: Burma s youth in Thailand see few opportunities to use education and vocational skills

SOUTH ASIA. India Nepal Sri Lanka. Returnee children at school in Mannar (Sri Lanka) 2012 GLOBAL REPORT UNHCR / G.AMARASINGHE

India Nepal Sri Lanka

Submission by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. for the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Compilation Report

ToR for Mid-term Evaluation

Origins of Refugees: Countries of Origin of Colorado Refugee and Asylee Arrivals

Russian Federation. Operational highlights. Persons of concern

2009 NGOS AND RESETTLEMENT ADVOCACY

Myanmar. Operational highlights. Working environment. Achievements and impact. Persons of concern. Main objectives and targets

SUPPLEMENTARY APPEAL 2015

2017 Year-End report. Operation: Thailand 25/7/2018. edit (

stateless, returnees and internally displaced people) identified and assisted more than 3,000 families.

58 UNHCR Global Report A resettled refugee from Iraq surveys the rooftops of Nuremberg, Germany, his new home.

Planning figures. Afghanistan 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 2,600 Asylum-seekers Somalia Various

Protection of Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs)

2017 Planning summary

Understanding the issues most important to refugee and asylum seeker youth in the Asia Pacific region

2018 Planning summary

Update on UNHCR s operations in Asia and the Pacific

EU policies supporting development and lasting solutions for displaced populations

SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC. Overview. Working environment GLOBAL APPEAL 2015 UPDATE

Year: 2012 Last update: 28/06/2012 Version 3 HUMANITARIAN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (HIP) BURMA/MYANMAR AND THAILAND

MYANMAR/BANGLADESH ROHINGYAS - THE SEARCH FOR SAFETY

Emergency preparedness and response

Nepal. Main objectives. Working environment. Planning figures. Total requirements: USD 6,398,200. Recent developments

REGIONAL STRATEGIC PRESENTATION SUMMARY TO 35 TH STANDING COMMITTEE MEETING (7-9 March 2006) Bureau for Asia and the Pacific

Russian Federation. Main objectives. Total requirements: USD 15,609,817

Sri Lanka. Pakistan Myanmar Various Refugees

Migration Consequences of Complex Crises: IOM Institutional and Operational Responses 1

High School Model United Nations February 26-February 27, 2011

UNHCR s programme in the United Nations proposed strategic framework for the period

Bangladesh Brunei Darussalam Cambodia Indonesia Lao People s Democratic Republic Malaysia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Timor-Leste Viet Nam

(revised 1 st Nov 2007)

A Fine Line between Migration and Displacement

Participatory Assessment Report

SOUTH-EAST ASIA. A sprightly 83 year-old lady displaced by Typhoon Haiyan collects blankets for her family in Lilioan Barangay, Philippines

Analysis of Royal Thai Government policy towards Displaced Persons from Myanmar

MALAYSIA. Working environment

Overview. Operational highlights. People of concern

Chapter 6: SGBV; UnaccompaniedandSeparatedChildren

The Global Strategic Priorities

Best Practices for Christian Ministry among Forcibly Displaced People

2016 Planning summary

Meanwhile, some 10,250 of the most vulnerable recognized refugees were submitted for resettlement.

Annual Report 2013 ช ำระค าฝากส งเป นรายเด อน ใบอน ญาตพ เศษท 55/2555 ศฟ. บด นทรเดชา 10312

LEAVE NO ONE BEHIND: A COMMITMENT TO ADDRESS FORCED DISPLACEMENT

Withyou. Annual Report 2011: Our Past Year s Achievements. UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) Bangkok Office newsletter, 2012 Volume 4

Eastern Europe. Operational highlights. Armenia. Azerbaijan. Belarus. Georgia. Moldova. Russian Federation. Ukraine

Welsh Action for Refugees: briefing for Assembly Members. The Welsh Refugee Coalition. Wales: Nation of Sanctuary. The Refugee Crisis

Middle East and North Africa

Uganda. Working environment. Main objectives. The context. The needs. Total requirements 2008: USD 16,851, : USD 16,147,083

WORKING ENVIRONMENT UNHCR / S. SAMBUTUAN

UNHCR AND INTERNALLY DISPLACED PERSONS. UNHCR s role in support of an enhanced humanitarian response to IDP situations

Bangladesh India Nepal Sri Lanka. Students of Indian origin in their school at Kotagala, Chrystler's Farm tea estate, Sri Lanka UNHCR / G.

Shan Refugees: Dispelling the Myths

ReDSS Solutions Statement: Somalia

Protection and Solutions Strategy for the Northern Triangle of Central America

Year: 2014 Last update: 29/10/2013 Version 1

Young refugees in Saloum, Egypt, who will be resettled, looking forward to a future in Sweden.

IGAD SPECIAL SUMMIT ON DURABLE SOLUTIONS FOR SOMALI REFUGEES AND REINTEGRATION OF RETURNEES IN SOMALIA

From Horror to Hopelessness. Kenya s Forgotten Somali Refugee Crisis

Sri Lanka. Persons of concern

Burmese Children in Thailand: Legal Aspects

UNHCR s programme in the United Nations proposed strategic framework for the period

MIDDLE NORTH. A Syrian refugee mother bakes bread for her family of 13 outside their shelter in the Bekaa Valley, Lebanon.

Mixed Migration Flows in the Asia-Pacific Region

Migration and Ethnicity and Rohingyas in Southeast Asia (13 October 2015) Htike Htike, Equal Harmony Together (EHT)

EC/68/SC/CRP.16. Cash-based interventions. Executive Committee of the High Commissioner s Programme. Standing Committee 69 th meeting.

LIBERIA. Overview. Operational highlights

Statement by H.E. Mr. Cihad Erginay, Ambassador, Deputy Undersecretary of Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Republic of Turkey

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Syrian Refugee Crisis: Refugees, Conflict, and International Law

2017 Year-End report. Operation: Cameroon 20/7/2018. edit (

Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan

SOMALIA. Overview. Working environment

Operational highlights. Persons of concern

UNITAR SEMINAR ON ENVIRONMENTALLY INDUCED MIGRATION AND CLIMATE CHANGE 20 April 2010 PRESENTATION IN SESSION II WHAT ARE IMPLICATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT?

Russian Federation. in short WORKING ENVIRONMENT. Main Objectives. Recent Developments

Transcription:

INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE June 15, 2007 Life in Exile: Burmese Refugees along the Thai-Burma Border The International Rescue Committee serves thousands of refugees and other uprooted peoples from Burma, who began crossing into Thailand in large numbers in 1984. Currently, more than 500,000 Burmese are internally displaced persons (IDPs) within eastern Burma, while another 154,000 are living in nine refugee camps in western Thailand and at least 1.5 million are dispersed along the border areas. Their numbers continue to grow because of ongoing human rights violations by Burma s ruling military junta, along with desperate economic conditions and the Burmese army s control of ethnic nationality areas in the eastern part of the country. IRC s assistance along the Thailand-Burma border covers a variety of sectors: comprehensive primary health care; education; local civil society capacity building; water and sanitation; funding for food distribution; legal assistance; income generation; psycho-social support; advocacy; and gender-based violence prevention and response. The IRC also runs a robust funding program for community-based organizations that provide humanitarian assistance to thousands of Burmese displaced along isolated border areas. IRC is a member of the coordination body for nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in Thailand, known as the Committee for the Coordination of Services to Displaced Person in Thailand or CCSDPT. The CCSDPT and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) have jointly issued a comprehensive plan for addressing the needs of displaced persons on the Thai-Burma border. IRC supports these recommendations outlined in that plan and summarizes many of its conclusions within this position paper. Context to the Displacement The situation in Burma, specifically in eastern Burma, continues to worsen. Last year an estimated 82,000 people were forced to leave their homes, reflecting the disregard by Burma s governing body, the State Peace and Development Council

(SPDC), of their responsibility to protect Burmese citizens from harm 1. Military rule and economic mismanagement have resulted in widespread poverty and barely functioning health and education systems. Burma s so-called National Convention, which ostensibly is the SPDC s road map to democracy, moves into its fourteenth year with no conclusion in sight. Additionally, without meaningful participation from many of the ethnic nationality groups and with the exclusion of the National League for Democracy, this process lacks legitimacy. Burmese Refugees in Thailand Despite a global trend to challenge the protracted confinement of refugees in camps, all Burmese refugees in Thailand are officially required to stay within camp boundaries. This requirement has been progressively enforced over the years. Currently, about 154,000 Burmese refugees reside in nine camps in Thailand and are almost entirely dependent on international assistance. Most refugees have no access to employment opportunities, forest products, or external education or occupational training. Refugees caught outside the camps are liable to arrest and deportation. As the security situation in Burma continues to deteriorate, new asylum seekers continue to arrive in the camps. Camp boundaries have long been demarcated and fixed, resulting in overcrowding. Although conditions vary considerably among camps, in several camps housing standards are significantly below UNHCR minimum standards. Long-term confinement in the camps has had a negative psychological impact on camp residents, resulting in increasing and serious mental health needs. As a new generation of refugees grows up entirely within a camp environment, the need to address the special health, physical, and social requirements of youth and adolescents is particularly acute. The situation has also growing protection concerns, particularly regarding levels of violence and the administration of justice in the camps. Over the last two years, NGOs together with UNHCR have been successful in advocating with the Royal Thai Government for refugees to have opportunities to earn an income, have access to legal assistance, and pursue education and skills training. In 2006, the Thai government gave NGOs permission to support limited occupational training activities for refugees. The government made commitments to improve education in the camps and to experiment with employment outside the camps, as well as to issue individual ID cards to all registered refugees. While these developments represent a major breakthrough and offer the possibility for refugees to become more self-sufficient in the future, such initiatives will take a long time to have a significant impact on camp life. In the short term, additional resources are needed to establish programs. At the same time, funding for existing programs must be protected. As Burma is still a 1 Internal Displacement in Eastern Burma: 2006 Survey, Thailand Burma Border Consortium, pg 20

refugee producing country, any reduction in refugee programming would increase mortality. Impact of Resettlement Refugee resettlement to third countries, particularly the U.S., is now a durable solution for some Burmese refugees. Approximately 4,500 camp residents departed for the U.S. in 2006, and numbers are expected to increase significantly in 2007 and 2008. As return to Burma and integration in Thailand are currently not viable, resettlement is a very positive development for a percentage of the refugees. Resettlement is not yet keeping sufficient pace with the birth rates and the rate of new arrivals to have a significant impact in reducing camp populations. However, because of the profile of refugees being resettled, the impact has begun to be felt and will increase as departures continue. The majority of refugees seeking resettlement are educated and skilled workers, community leaders, teachers, and staff in NGOs and community-based organizations. Organizations have had to compensate for the loss of such human resources and are facing the daunting challenge of trying to maintain essential services such as health care and education despite the decrease of skilled workers. NGOs are also incurring significant costs to run training programs to replace refugee employees who are being resettled. Burmese Migrants in Thailand More than 1.5 million mostly undocumented Burmese in Thailand are considered migrants 2 and are living in severely marginalized conditions. Like the Burmese in the refugee camps, these so-called migrants have fled Burma because of economic and political repression. For this population, the barriers to health care and education for their children are formidable. The migrant assistance communities, with very encouraging leadership from the Thai Ministries of Health and Education, are developing national health and education strategies to mainstream migrants access to these services into Thai national policies. In the interim, however, the Thai government relies heavily on the international community to support migrant assistance programs. Internally Displaced Burmese While the need for humanitarian assistance to Burmese in Thailand is apparent, what is less well known is the tremendous need for such assistance in eastern Burma, where some 500,000 Burmese are internally displaced. Despite the expansion of aid programs inside Burma in the early 2000s, the conflict-affected 2 Evidence is suggesting that many so-called economic migrants may actually have legitimate claims as refugees, citing political persecution as motivating factor for leaving Burma.

areas along the Thai border remain a critical gap. 3 Unfettered and complete access to these areas from inside Burma is unlikely, at least in the near future. Future Prospects The political and human rights situation inside Burma shows no improvement. While it is very difficult to predict refugee and IDP flows, the political, military and economic realities of Burma indicate that the state of affairs for uprooted Burmese will not change significantly. The potential for wide-scale human rights abuses and displacement remain likely in the coming years. It is therefore essential that all basic services of food, shelter, health and education to refugees, migrants and IDPs be maintained, not only for humanitarian reasons but also to ensure that Thailand continues to keep the doors of asylum open for new arrivals. Sufficient funding and an overall strategy for the Thai-Burma border are essential. Recommendations to all Donors: Ensure that current basic services are maintained, and improve them where necessary to meet international standards while additional resources are found to support new initiatives. Establish a more formal, coordinated response to both funding and policy priorities that support the CCSDPT/UNHCR s Comprehensive Plan strategies. Respond to the effects of resettlement on remaining camp residents and create a strategic response to mitigate impacts. Expand support to local organizations with greater access to displaced populations along the border than that available to international NGOs. Support new initiatives for income generation and other projects aimed at improving the protection environment in the camps, particularly for women and children. Broaden support in Thailand to include local organizations supporting and advocating for all Burmese in Thailand who are without documentation and living outside the refugee camps. Recommendations to the Royal Thai Government: 3 Myanmar: New Threats to Humanitarian Aid, Update Briefing, Asia Briefing N 58, International Crisis Group, 8 December 2006, pg. 4.

Continue to work in cooperation with the CCSDPT & UNHCR s Comprehensive Plan strategies that aim to improve the protection environment, camp living conditions, and access to education.