IP IN A POST-BREXIT EUROPE ENSURING YOUR EUROPEAN IP RIGHTS ARE PROTECTED DATE: 10 NOVEMBER 2016 PRESENTERS: CHRIS FINN, BEN GRAU AND GRAHAM MURNANE

Similar documents
Effect of Brexit on IP protection

THE NEW EU PATENT: COST-EFFECTIVE ALTERNATIVES FOR YOUR BUSINESS

The EU Unitary Patent System in its current state. EU-Japan Policy Seminar 22 November 2016

Patent litigation. Block 3. Module UPC Law Essentials

Brexit Implications on the Life Sciences Sector

Patent Protection: Europe

The Current Status of the Unitary Patent Package

Unitary Patent Procedure before the EPO

Patent reform package - Frequently Asked Questions

PATENT SYSTEM STATUS OFREFORMS

The European Patent and the UPC

Reply to the studies on The Impact of Brexit on Unitary Patent Protection and its Court by Hans Ullrich and Matthias Lamping 1

Unitary Patent Guide. Obtaining, maintaining and managing Unitary Patents

GERMAN UTILITY MODEL THE UNDERRATED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHT DATE: WEDNESDAY 12 NOVEMBER 2014 LOCATION: GLASGOW, UK

PROPOSALS FOR CREATING UNITARY PATENT PROTECTION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

Patent litigation. Block 2. Module Jurisdiction and procedure Complementary reading: Unified Patent Court Agreement ( UPCA )

Unitary Patent in Europe & Unified Patent Court (UPC)

Dr Julian M. Potter February 2014

The potential impact of Brexit on the European Patenting landscape

European Patent with Unitary Effect

UNIFIED PATENT SYSTEM: A NEW OPPORTUNITY FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN EUROPE

EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 12 December 2012 (OR. en) 2011/0093 (COD) PE-CONS 72/11 PI 180 CODEC 2344 OC 70

The Unitary Patent & The Unified Patent Court IP Key & Centre for Commercial Law Studies, Queen Mary University of London 8 November 2016

Europe-wide patent protection and the competence of the Unified Patent Court

Council Decision of 10 March 2011 authorising enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection (2011/167/EU)

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

PATENT SYSTEM STATUS OF REFORMS

UPC FUTURE OF PATENT LITIGATION IN EUROPE. Alexander Haertel

The Progress to Date with the Unitary European Patent and the Unified Patent Court for Europe

Fordham IP Conference 4-5 April 2013 Remedies session Laëtitia Bénard Cross-border injunctions for registered IP rights in Europe

Draft Rules relating to Unitary Patent Protection revised version of Rules 1 to 11 of SC/16/13

13345/14 BB/ab 1 DG G3

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Unitary patent and Unified Patent Court: the proposed framework

Our Speakers: Rudy I. Kratz Partner; Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery LLP. Tony Wray Director and Founder; Optimus Patents Ltd.

9107/15 TB/at 1 DG G 3 B

IP in a World of Change: Europe and Brexit; United States and its exit from the TPP: Where does IP Protection come in?

IS 2016 THE FINAL STRETCH BEFORE THE ENTRY IN FORCE OF

Council Decision of 10 March 2011 authorising enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection (2011/167/EU)

Judicial training in the framework of the Unified Patent Court as a prerequisite for the success of the Unitary Patent System

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 15 April /11 Interinstitutional File: 2011/0094 (CNS) PI 32 PROPOSAL

TREE.2 EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 14 March 2019 (OR. en) 2018/0298 (COD) PE-CONS 13/19 MAR 13 PREP-BXT 19 CODEC 172

COMPULSORY LICENCE in Germany. Markus Rieck LL.M.

Unified Patent Court & Rules of Procedure Where do we stand

Slide 13 What rights does a patent confer?

(Legislative acts) REGULATIONS

Recent developments at the European Patent Office

AGREEMENT. between the European Patent Organisation and the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization

Agreement. (as in force from April 1, 2017)*

ARE IP COURTS IN EUROPE REALLY UNIFIED? Ian Hiscock (Novartis) Rob Jacob (Stephenson Harwood LLP)

Standing Committee on. Unitary Patent / Unified Patent Court

Information note on the UK referendum decision and its potential implications

The Rules of Procedure for the opt-out

Draft agreement on a Unified Patent Court and draft Statute - Revised Presidency text

PUBLIC LIMITE EN COUNCILOF THEEUROPEANUNION. Brussels,17November /11. InterinstitutionalFile: 2011/0093(COD) LIMITE PI154 CODEC1979

No. prev. doc.: 15819/13 PI 159 European Patent with Unitary Effect and Unified Patent Court - Information by the Presidency

Dehns Guide to the Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court

Recommendation for a COUNCIL DECISION

Overview economic research activities at the EPO 2013/2014

European Patent Law. Gwilym Roberts Daniel Brook

Scottish Universities Legal Network on Europe

Patents: opposition proceedings and nullity actions a comparison between Europe and Japan

Healing the divisions: A positive vision for equality and human rights in Britain

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

UNITARY PATENT PROTECTION (UPP) PACKAGE

Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court

RESPONSE TO. Questionnaire. On the patent system in Europe INTRODUCTION

Trade Bill EXPLANATORY NOTES

The Unitary Patent Package: Twelve Reasons for Concern

REGULATION (EU) No 649/2012 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 4 July 2012 concerning the export and import of hazardous chemicals

Developing an International IP strategy. Leslie Prichard UK Chartered & European Patent Attorney European Design Attorney culverstons

The Unitary Patent & Unified Patent Court

Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court

The Unitary Patent and the Unified Patent Court. Dr. Leonard Werner-Jones

VIRK - Västsvenska Immaterialrättsklubben

FINAL PROPOSAL OF THE ACT ON AMENDMENTS TO THE PATENT ACT

EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 15 May 2014 (OR. en) 2013/0010 (COD) LEX 1542 PE-CONS 39/1/14 REV 1

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

The Unitary Patent Unified Patent Court. Taylor Wessing LLP

AGREEMENT. (as in force from January 1, 2018)*

Unitary Patent Protection, Unified Patent Court, Supplementary Protection Certificate and Brexit

Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EU) on the translation arrangements for the European Union patent {SEC(2010) 796} {SEC(2010) 797}

The German constitutional challenge

Analysis. The UK opt-out from Justice and Home Affairs law: the other Member States finally lose patience

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 7 April /09 Interinstitutional File: 2000/0177 (CNS) PI 28

UNIFIED PATENT COURT (UPC) Einheitliches Patentgericht (EPG) Juridiction Unifiée du Brevet (JUB)

THE NEW EUROPEAN UNIFIED PATENT COURT & THE UNITARY PATENT

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 27 September /12 PI 113 COUR 66 WORKING DOCUMENT

(Acts whose publication is obligatory) concerning the creation of a supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products

Hague Act of November 28, 1960

ANNEXES. to the. Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. on the European Union trade mark (codification)

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

The Unitary Patent Plan Beta Update on National Case Law in Europe

European Patents. Page 1 of 6

Report on the Diplomatic Conference for the Revision of the European Patent Convention. Munich, November 20-29, 2000

AGREEMENT. (as in force from September 1, 2018)*

AGREEMENT. between the Finnish Patent and Registration Office and the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization

European Commission Questionnaire on the Patent System in Europe

European Patent with Unitary Effect and

Foundation Certificate

Transcription:

IP IN A POST-BREXIT EUROPE ENSURING YOUR EUROPEAN IP RIGHTS ARE PROTECTED DATE: 10 NOVEMBER 2016 PRESENTERS: CHRIS FINN, BEN GRAU AND GRAHAM MURNANE

BACKGROUND A fundamental aspect of the European Union (EU) is the harmonisation of legal systems, including the field of IP law 51.9% of the British electorate taking part in the referendum on 23 June 2016 voted for Brexit, i.e. for the UK leaving the EU What are the consequences of Brexit in the context of IP?

BREXIT WHERE ARE WE? UK is still member of European Union Will be until Article 50 of Lisbon Treaty triggered expected early 2017 Then 2 years to negotiate exit Unanimous consent of EU member states needed to extend > 2 years Legal challenge PM cannot decide to trigger Article 50 Act of Parliament required Appeal to be heard by Dec 2016

WHAT IS ARTICLE 50? Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty 1. Any Member State may decide to withdraw from the Union in accordance with its own constitutional requirements. 2. A Member State which decides to withdraw shall notify the European Council of its intention. In the light of the guidelines provided by the European Council, the Union shall negotiate and conclude an agreement with that State, setting out the arrangements for its withdrawal, taking account of the framework for its future relationship with the Union. That agreement shall be negotiated in accordance with Article 218(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. It shall be concluded on behalf of the Union by the Council, acting by a qualified majority, after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament. 3. The Treaties shall cease to apply to the State in question from the date of entry into force of the withdrawal agreement or, failing that, two years after the notification referred to in paragraph 2, unless the European Council, in agreement with the Member State concerned, unanimously decides to extend this period. 4. For the purposes of paragraphs 2 and 3, the member of the European Council or of the Council representing the withdrawing Member State shall not participate in the discussions of the European Council or Council or in decisions concerning it. 5. A qualified majority shall be defined in accordance with Article 238(3)(b) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. 5. If a State which has withdrawn from the Union asks to rejoin, its request shall be subject to the procedure referred to in Article 49.

EU REGULATIONS AND DIRECTIVES EU Regulations apply to all EU Member States - no need for national legislation EU Directives must be implemented into national law before they take effect After Brexit, EU Regulations will cease to apply to UK After Brexit, EU Directives already in UK law - will remain in effect until repealed or amended

EP, PCT AND UK PATENTS European Patent Convention (EPC) is not EU legislation, so unaffected by Brexit UK patents granted by EPO unaffected PCT applications unaffected UK patents granted by UKIPO unaffected Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court position uncertain

EUROPEAN BUNDLE PATENT AFTER BREXIT EPC already affected by EU law (e.g. implementation of the EU biotechnology directive (OJ EPO 1999, 101)) Patent litigation may be affected (if Brussels 1 regulation does not apply)

TRADE SECRETS No change for holders of trade secrets in the UK The UK already exceeds minimum standards as specified by the new EU Trade Secrets Directive No need for the UK to implement the new Directive

IP RIGHTS UNDER EU REGULATION EU (Community) Trade Mark EU Registered Community Design Community Plant Variety Rights Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs) Form of patent term restoration to compensate for regulatory delays in approval of medicinal products Regulatory Data Protection (RDP) 8+2+1 protection for pharmaceuticals Orphan Drug Exclusivity Nagoya Protocol UK reluctant adopter All will need transitional rules to be worked out

IP RIGHTS UNDER EU REGULATION More than 50 years of EU law will need to be reflected in UK law after Brexit IP related regulations just one small part of EU law Would need years of parliamentary time to be re-enacted under UK law Expected that most EU regulations will be re-enacted en masse by UK Regulation UK IP profession pressing for this

UNITARY PATENT / UNIFIED PATENT COURT AFTER BREXIT Main problem: UK End the supremacy of EU law Supremacy and uniformity of EU Law EU Relevant legal basis European regulations (1257/2012 and 1260/2012) Unified Patent Court Agreement CJEU s Opinion 1/09

POSSIBLE SCENARIOS A) Ratification of the UPCA by the UK prior to leaving the EU B) Delaying ratification until a solution for the participation of the UK has been found C) UK resigns from being UPCA contracting party, subsequent amendments to proceed without UK D) No action taken by the UK - amendments to the UPCA to proceed without UK E) Exit from Brexit

A) RATIFICATION PRIOR TO LEAVING UK could remain part of the system if certain amendments are made (for details of necessary amendments e.g. Richard Gordon QC and Tom Pascoe The effect of Brexit on the unitary patent regulation and the unified patent court agreement ) UK could ratify the agreement in order to allow necessary amendments to the regulations and the agreement to be made without new ratification No negotiation prior to triggering Art. 50 Lisbon treaty; ratification would need to be based on informal consent that changes will be made in order to keep UK within the UP / UPC system New CJEU opinion would be helpful

A) RATIFICATION PRIOR TO LEAVING Problem: ARTICLE 21 UPCA Requests for preliminary rulings As a court common to the Contracting Member States and as part of their judicial system, the Court shall cooperate with the Court of Justice of the European Union to ensure the correct application and uniform interpretation of Union law, as any national court, in accordance with Article 267 TFEU in particular. Decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union shall be binding on the Court. Implied acceptance of EU law supremacy, irrespective from EU membership?

B) DELAY RATIFICATION Amendments of legal framework as part of exit agreements (Art. 50 Lisbon treaty) Significant delay for UP / UPC (2 to X years) Acceptable for other member states?

C) RESIGN FROM BEING UPCA CONTRACTING PARTY Art. 54 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: The termination of a treaty or the withdrawal of a party may take place: (a) in conformity with the provisions of the treaty; or (b) at any time by consent of all the parties after consultation with the other contracting States. UK would no longer be required to ratify the UPCA (Art. 89 UPCA), Italy or the Netherlands would follow Subsequent amendment of Art. 7 UPCA and/or Annex II of the UPCA

D) AMENDMENTS TO CONTINUE WITHOUT UK Amendment of the agreement and reopen ratification process or Art. 54 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: Fundamental change of circumstances Amendment of Art. 7(2) and 89 UPCA Continuation without UK

EXIT FROM BREXIT? UK High Court decision of 3 November 2016 Triggering Article 50 must involve parliament Exit from Brexit not likely

TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS Existing rights: Present status Status post-brexit date Associated rights (International Registrations) New applications pre-brexit date: Strategies After Brexit date: Strategies Maintenance of rights (use, etc.)

SCENARIOS FOR TRANSITION EUTMS

SCENARIOS FOR TRANSITION RCDS

COPYRIGHT / IP AGREEMENTS No direct impact on copyright, as mainly national law applies Licences, co-existence agreements and other IP agreements will need to cover new geo-political situation; existing agreements might need to be amended

ENFORCEMENT Litigation affected (if Brussels 1 regulation does not apply) Effect on border seizure Exhaustion of IP rights limited to UK Enforcement of foreign judgments affected (if Brussels 1 regulation does not apply)

THANKS TO THE AUDIENCE! Christian Finn UK and European Trade Mark Attorney T: +44 (0) 141 307 8400 E: christian.finn@murgitroyd.com Dr Ben Grau German and European Patent Attorney T: +49 (0) 89 3090 71100 E: ben.grau@murgitroyd.com Graham Murnane UK and European Patent Attorney T: +44 (0) 141 307 8400 E: graham.murnane@murgitroyd.com www.murgitroyd.com