Depositions, Interrogatories and Requests for Admission: Using Civil Discovery in TPR Cases

Similar documents
Chapter 5 DISCOVERY. 5.1 Vocabulary Introduction and Discovery Deadlines Chart The Deposition 6

Professionalism/Ethics Series: Ethical Issues Arising While Conducting Discovery in 42 U.S.C Cases

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) UNIFORM SCHEDULING ORDER

Discovery Requests in Trademark Cases Under U.S. Law

Litigating in California State Court, but Not a Local? (Part 2) 1

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO. : Plaintiff : vs. : FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER : Case No. Defendant :

PART III Discovery CHAPTER 8. Overview of the Discovery Process KEY POINTS THE NATURE OF DISCOVERY THE EXTENT OF ALLOWABLE DISCOVERY

R in a Nutshell by Mark Meltzer and John W. Rogers

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 211 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DOCKET CONTROL ORDER STEP ACTION RULE DATE DUE 1

[CAPTION] INTERROGATORIES [NAME AND ADDRESS OF PLAINTIFF S ATTORNEY] Attorneys for Plaintiff TO:

Civil Litigation Forms Library

Case 3:16-cv CRS-CHL Document 36 Filed 06/29/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 423

Case 6:01-cv MV-WPL Document Filed 01/12/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Table of Contents. See also Summary of Contents beginning on page vii.

Fundamentals of Civil Litigation in Federal Court

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER n: DISPUTE RESOLUTION

State of Wisconsin: Circuit Court: Racine County: v. Case No. 2008CM261. Motion to Exclude State's Witnesses

Case 2:05-cv CNC Document 119 Filed 07/13/2006 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No.

EVIDENCE, FOUNDATIONS AND OBJECTIONS. Laurie Vahey, Esq.

Rules of the Equal Opportunities Commission November 10, 2016

USPTO Trials: Understanding the Scope and Rules of Discovery

PEACE OFFICER PRIVILEGES IN CIVIL LITIGATION: An Introduction to the Pitchess Procedure

RESPECTIVE RIGHTS OF PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT TO DISCOVERY

John H. Tatlock. The Harris Law Firm, P.C.

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LUZERNE COUNTY

CASE MANAGEMENT PROTOCOL OAKLAND COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT BUSINESS COURT CASES

RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART ONE RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

WYOMING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR CIRCUIT COURTS

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL CIVIL DIVISION

SUBPOENA IN AN ADVERSARY PROCEEDING

NO. V. AT LAW NO. 1. Defendant(s). ELLIS COUNTY, TEXAS. FINAL PRETRIAL SUBMISSION [Required For Bench Trials over two (2) hours]

Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery; Duty of Disclosure [ Proposed Amendment ]

GENERAL ORDER FOR LUCAS COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION. damages for alleged exposure to asbestos or asbestos-containing products; that many of the

PREPARING FOR TRIAL. 3. Opponent s experts identified, complete Rule 26 responses received and, if possible and necessary, experts have been deposed.

may institute, without paying a filing fee, a proceeding under this chapter to secure relief.

NO. V. AT LAW NO. 1. Defendant(s). ELLIS COUNTY, TEXAS. FINAL PRETRIAL SUBMISSION (CPS Trial)

RULES OF EVIDENCE LEGAL STANDARDS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE JON S.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PASCO COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION. Case No. 51-

CONTENTS OF PROPOSED TIME CALCULATION CHANGES TO COLORADO RULES COLORADO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (RULES 1-122). 2

FORM 4. RULE 26(f) REPORT (PATENT CASES) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs,

Rhode Island False Claims Act

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT LAW DIVISION JUDGE RAYMOND W. MITCHELL STANDING ORDER.

APPELLATE RESPONSIBILITIES OF TRIAL COUNSEL, PRESERVING THE RECORD FOR APPEAL AND CASE LAW UPDATE. Melinda Swartz.

vs. OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS DISCOVERY AND DOCKET CONTROL PLAN FOR LEVEL 3 CASE ( PLAN )

AISHA BROWN, ET AL. NO CA-0921 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL. FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *

Motions/Motions in Limine. with Nadya Perez-Reyes, and Matthew Giesfeldt, Assistant State Public Defenders

RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW COURT

Case 9:01-cv MHS-KFG Document 72 Filed 08/16/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1935

RULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION BUREAU OF TENNCARE

FLORIDA RULES OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROCEDURE

District of Columbia False Claims Act

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

Depositions upon oral examination. A. When depositions may be taken. After commencement of the action, any party may take the testimony of any

HAWAII ADMINISTRATIVE RULES TITLE 12 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS SUBTITLE 7 BOARDS CHAPTER 47

Kohl's Department Stores 10/2/15 Electronic Data Interchange Trading Partner Agreement

31 U.S.C. Section 3733 Civil investigative demands

MONTANA UNIFORM DISTRICT COURT RULES

Cislo & Thomas LLP Litigation Cost Control (LCC ) Stages of Litigation and Expected Fees and Costs

PCLR 7 MOTIONS: JUDGES AND COMMISSIONERS

BLAKE ROBERTSON NO CA-0975 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL LAFAYETTE INSURANCE COMPANY FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF (****) Case No. The Discovery Status Conference came before Discovery Referee on.

CASE NUMBER: DIV 71. It appearing that this case is at issue and can be set for trial, it is ORDERED as follows:

Superior Court of California County of Orange

TEXAS DISCOVERY. Brock C. Akers CHAPTER 1 LAW REVISIONS TO TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE GOVERNING DISCOVERY

Judicial Practice Preferences Circuit Civil/Section 11

TRIAL ADVOCACY - FALL 2005

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 11-CV-1128

THE COLORADO CIVIL ACCESS PILOT PROJECT APPLICABLE TO BUSINESS ACTIONS IN CERTAIN DISTRICT COURTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Dodge County. 1) Rules of Decorum. (Sixth Judicial District)

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER

APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: MARYANN SUMI, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

Litigation Pitfalls STEWART HARMAN

CIRCUIT AND CHANCERY COURTS:

Third, it should provide for the orderly admission of evidence.

RULES OF THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER MEDIATION AND HEARING PROCEDURES TABLE OF CONTENTS

Admissibility of Electronic Evidence

State of Minnesota In Supreme Court

TITLE XIV TRIALS (6/30/03) 84. The amendment is effective as of June 30, 2003.

DEPOSITIONS UPON ORAL EXAMINATION. Notice; Method of Taking; Production at Deposition.

Resolution Through the Courts TEI Audits & Appeals Seminar

PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT

SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO

Case 2:12-md CMR Document 437 Filed 04/01/13 Page 1 of 6

CASE NUMBER: UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

Getting a Trial Date in Cowlitz County

Foreclosure Actions Based on Breach of Contract

Discovery in Justice Court

Discovery s Purpose and Discovery Control Plans and Limitations Texas Rule 190

PARTIES JOINT RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER OF APRIL 28 TH, 2005

2010 AMENDMENTS TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Abbott Marie Jones

Case: 2:15-cv MHW-NMK Doc #: 19 Filed: 07/01/15 Page: 1 of 5 PAGEID #: 138

SUMMARY JURY TRIALS IN NORTH CAROLINA

THE COURTS. Title 207 JUDICIAL CONDUCT

Transcription:

Depositions, Interrogatories and Requests for Admission: Using Civil Discovery in TPR Cases Jessica Hutson Polakowski 22 E. Mifflin St., Suite 600 Madison, WI 53703 608-229-2281 jpolakowski@reinhartlaw.com Joseph W. Voiland 1000 North Water Street, Suite 1700 Milwaukee, WI 53202 414-298-8379 jvoiland@reinhartlaw.com

Mandatory Discovery Conference Wisconsin Statute 804.01(2)(e): No party may serve a request to produce or inspect under s. 804.09 seeking the discovery of electronically stored information, or respond to an interrogatory under s. 804.08 (3) by producing electronically stored information, until after the parties confer regarding all of the following, unless excused by the court 2

Six Things to Look for in Every Set of Written Discovery 1. Identification of witnesses 2. Identification of supporting documents 3. Identification of any alleged standards of conduct, standards of care 3

Ten Things to Look for in Every Set of Written Discovery 4. Identification of facts underlying key allegations in the pleadings 5. Identification of expert opinions and bases of expert witness testimony 6. Identification of people having responsibility for maintaining electronic information 4

Two Things to Avoid 1. Asking for descriptions of events 2. Asking for legal analysis or argument Your opponent will only provide descriptions and analysis that are favorable to them 5

Interrogatories Wisconsin Statutes 804.08 Limited in number by jurisdiction, including subparts Do not overuse early on 6

Practice Tip Substitute Requests for Admission for interrogatories They're free, they're unlimited, and they are disproportionately in your favor 7

What Do You Want to Learn and Why? Witness Identification Example: Identify all persons who provided any information used or relied upon in forming the Petition in this case. 8

Requiring witnesses to be identified lets you determine who to depose and who may be your trial witnesses Courts may refuse to allow witnesses testify who were not identified in a proper interrogatory 9

Witness Identification * Ask about Hybrid Witnesses: The Social Worker Ask whether any fact witnesses may also provide opinion or expert testimony, and what that testimony will be. (e.g., the social worker). Ask whether any of these witnesses may rely upon information provided by other. (also the social worker) 10

Requests for Production of Documents Wisconsin Statute 804.09 No limit on the number of requests 11

Types of Requests: 1. For types of documents: Example --all documents constituting the file maintained by you on Antoinette Fuller Shortcoming --does not cover documents of unknown types which might contain useful information 12

2. For documents related to a subject matter: Example --all documents which refer or relate to the allegations made in the Petition Shortcoming --hard to know if you have received every document which complies 13

3. Contention requests: Example --all documents which support your contention that Ms. Fuller failed to assume parental responsibility. 14

A good set of document requests will include all 3 types of requests, plus the following catch-all: "Please produce each and every document related in any way to the Petition, whether the document may be used affirmatively, defensively, for impeachment, or for rebuttal." 15

Electronically Stored Information Request such information in its original electronic form. For example, you do not want a printed copy of a spreadsheet, but the computer file from which the spreadsheet was printed. 16

That computer file contains: Text that may not show when printed Changes and edits Authors and editors Date the file was last modified 17

You want e-mail & electronic communications Most communication is never reduced to printed form An opponent who prints out e-mails from electronic form is in some sense producing modifying evidence 18

Do not assume that your opponent will produce electronic information just because it is included in your definition of document. Specifically ask for electronic information in the language of individual document requests. And then follow up and ask again. 19

Effective discovery often requires an initial deposition of a witness who has knowledge about the computer systems and files of a party. Consider this interrogatory: "State the name of each employee whose computer drives and electronic mailboxes were reviewed for production of documents in this matter." 20

Requests to Admit Wisconsin Statute 804.11 21

RFAs are underused but powerful Facts or contentions admitted are "conclusively established," although a party can obtain relief from an admission by motion prior to trial No limit on the number of requests 22

Example: "Admit that each document you have produced in response to these requests for admissions is genuine and authentic." 23

Deposition of an Entity (e.g., the plaintiff) and Other Considerations with Outgoing Discovery Use written discovery tools in connection with a 30(b)(6) designated representative deposition 24

What Do You Want to Learn and Why? By taking the deposition of a designated representative you can gather basic factual information about how the party operates, what documents it regularly maintains, and how its computer network is organized, among other things 25

Personal Knowledge Requirement Someone with personal knowledge must sign the interrogatory respones. Wis. Stat. 804.08(1)(b). That person should become a witness in the case, and therefore cannot be the plaintiff's attorney. The attorney, however, does not sign responses to the production of documents, but does sign for any objections made. 26

Final Points Discovery takes time, and patience because it proceeds in phases. Conduct it with your sights set on trial. Be honest always Correct any mistakes Verify and do not have any typographical errors in final, signed documents. 27