IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

Similar documents
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Case No. SC19- EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA AMICUS BRIEF OF THE APPELLATE PRACTICE SECTION OF THE FLORIDA BAR IN SUPPORT OF THE PETITIONER

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. : SC MICHAEL A. PIZZI, JR., Individually, Petitioner, -vs.-

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA. vs. L.T. No. 2D06-536

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Case No. SC ON ORIGINAL PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, DCA CASE No. 5D v. CASE NO. SC ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

CASE NO. SC ( ~ JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF

CITY OF SAN DIEGO. (This Measure will appear on the ballot in the following form.)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Case No.: SC RESPONSE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE IN OPPOSITION TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. SC04-58 ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. CASE NO.: SC FIRST DCA CASE NO.: 1D L.T. CASE NO.: L

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC Petition for review of District Court of Appeal Case No. 1D BEVERLY ROGERS, et al.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

IN Tl le SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SCl3-153 L. T. CASR NOS.; 4DI J-4801, CA COCE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. L.T. No. 1D

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

Constitution of the National Education Association of the United States

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. DAPHNE ELAINE HENSON, Florida Second District Court of Appeal Case Appellee. Number: 2D /

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC L.T. No. DO LAKELAND REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC., Petitioner,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA RESPONDENT HENRY ANDREW HACSI S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, S.C. Case No. SC DCA Case No. 3D v. L.T. Case No. 08-CA-45992

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. SC L.T. NO. 1D STATE OF FLORIDA,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. ERIC S. SMITH, Respondent.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC04- EDNA DE LA PENA, Petitioner, vs. SUNSHINE BOUQUET COMPANY and HORTICA, Respondents.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 3D THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, -vs- MAXIMILIANO ROMERO, Respondent.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 3D VINCENT MARGIOTTI. Petitioner, -vs- STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA AMENDED JURISDICTIONAL ANSWER BRIEF OF RESPONDENT STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC


SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JAMES LEVOY WATERS, Petitioner, SHERIFF, ESCAMBIA COUNTY FLORIDA, Respondent. CASE NO. SC

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Lower Tribunal No.: 4D RESPONDENT S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION. On Review from the District Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC: 4 th DCA CASE NO: 4D STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. SALVATORE BENNETT,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC04-156

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC12- DEMARIOUS CALDWELL, Petitioner, - versus - STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, CASE NO. SC JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. S.CtCaseNo.: D.C.A. Case No.: 1D MARK ALLEN BIR. Petitioner. STATE OF FLORIDA Respondent

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Case No. SC *********************************************************************

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PETITIONER, EMILY HALE S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC MUHAMMAD RAHEEM TAQWA EL SUPREME KALIFA. Petitioner. GRADY JUDD, SHERIFF, et. al.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: Lower Case No.: ID PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF. On Review from the District Court

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT. Appellant, v. Case No. 4D L.T. No.: MM000530A STATE OF FLORIDA,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, Case No. SC JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT PAMELA JO BONDI ATTORNEY GENERAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC12- ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST DISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA RESPONDENT S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA NO:SC STEVE LYNCH, Petitioner, 477 DCA CASE NO: 3D1-61 Vs. L.T. CASE NO: C

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC CHRISTINE BAUER and THOMAS BAUER, Petitioners, ONE WEST BANK, FSB, Respondent.

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC LOWER COURT NO.: 4D JACK LIEBMAN. Petitioner. vs.

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC RESPONDENT S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA PETITIONER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION

Henry Diaz, SC Case No.: SC Petitioner, DCA Case No.: 1D

RESPONDENT S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION

incarceration was ordered for indigent defendant without requiring the fundamental fairness test as required in

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, Case No. SC JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, v. CASE NO. SC L.T. NO. 1D DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE,

Petitioner, Respondent.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

Supreme Court of Florida

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC BEST DIVERSIFIED, INC. and PETER HUFF. Petitioners, vs.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. SC ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, CHARLES FRATELLO, Respondent. Case No. SC07-780

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Case No. SC STATE OF FLORIDA, DCA NO.: 2D

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA RESPONDENTS JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, Case No. SC PETITIONER'S REPLY BRIEF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO PUBLIC DEFENDER, ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, -vs-

CASE NO. SC L.T. CASE NO. 4D IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CATHERINE STANEK-COUSINS, Petitioner, STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC JAMES THOMPSON, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Florida

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC R.H., G.W., T.L., juveniles, Petitioners, vs.

certain charges are ineligible when adjudication is withheld

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DERRICK GURLEY, Petitioner, STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. Case No. SC th DCA Case No.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC06-56 BEVERLY PENZELL AND BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Petitioners, vs.

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC BETTY JEAN MANN, Petitioner,

JUL , L2J7," 1)11

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC04-947

Supreme Court of Florida

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC L.T. CASE NO. 13-CA SIDNEY KARABEL, CHRISTOPHER TRAPANI, and VICKI THOMAS,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC JEFFREY E. LEWIS, et al., Appellants, LEON COUNTY, et al., Appellees

STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF PODIATRIC MEDICINE

CASE NO. SC DAVID M. SORIA, M.D., INPHYNET CONTRACTING SERVICES, INC. and TEAM HEALTH, INC., JURISDICTIONAL ANSWER BRIEF

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO.: SC Lower Tribunal Nos.: 5D CA W HOWARD BROWNING, Petitioner, vs. LYNN ANNE POIRIER,

Supreme Court of Florida

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

Transcription:

Filing # 8817679 Electronically Filed 01/06/2014 10:34:52 AM RECEIVED, 1/6/2014 10:38:32, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA BARBARA DEVANE Petitioner, v. HON. RICK SCOTT, GOVERNOR, Respondent. Case No.: SC14- PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS Donald M. Hinkle Florida Bar No. 301027 HINKLE & FORAN 3500 Financial Plaza, Suite 350 Tallahassee, FL 32312 (850) 205-2055 Fax: (850) 205-2056 don@hinkleforan.com Attorney for Petitioner

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... i TABLE OF CITATIONS... ii INTRODUCTION... 1 BASIS FOR INVOKING THE JURISDICTION OF THE COURT... 1 STATEMENT OF THE FACTS... 1 NATURE OF THE RELIEF SOUGHT... 4 ARGUMENT... 4 I. PETITIONER HAS A CLEAR LEGAL RIGHT AS CITIZEN AND TAXPAYER TO REQUEST MANDAMUS RELIEF.... 5 II. THE GOVERNOR HAS A CLEAR LEGAL DUTY TO FILL THE VACANCY IN THE OFFICE OF LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR.... 5 III. PETITIONER HAS NO OTHER ADEQUATE REMEDY.... 7 CONCLUSION... 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE... 8 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE... 9 i

TABLE OF CITATIONS CASES Brown v. Firestone, 382 So. 2d 654 (Fla. 1980)... 7 Careerxchange, Inc. v. Unemployment Appeals Com n, 916 So. 2d 68 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)... 6 Dean v. Crews, 81 So. 479 (Fla. 1919)... 6 Gordon v. State, 901 So. 2d 399 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)... 6 Lawyer v. Munro, 118 So. 2d 654 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960)... 6 Pleus v. Crist, 14 So. 3d 941 (Fla. 2009)... 1, 4, 5, 7 Rogers v. Bandy, 182 So. 281 (Fla. 1938)... 6 State ex rel. Kelly v. Sullivan, 52 So. 2d 422 (Fla. 1951)... 6 STATUTES, CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS, AND RULES OF COURT Art, V, 3(b)(8), Fla. Const.... 1 Art. IV, 3, Fla. Const.... 3 14.055, Fla. Stat....passim 14.056, Fla. Stat.... 3 ii

INTRODUCTION Barbara DeVane petitions for a writ of mandamus directing the Governor to appoint a Lieutenant Governor. The question presented is whether following the resignation of Lieutenant Governor Jennifer Carroll in March, 2013, the Governor can defy the requirement of section 14.055, Florida Statutes, that upon vacancy he shall appoint a successor to serve the remainder of the term. BASIS FOR INVOKING THE JURISDICTION OF THE COURT This Court has original jurisdiction under Article V, Section 3(b)(8) of the Florida Constitution, as well as Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 9.030(a)(3), to issue writs of mandamus to direct the Governor to make an appointment required by statute. Pleus v. Crist, 14 So. 3d 941, 942 & 942 n.3 (Fla. 2009). STATEMENT OF THE FACTS Jennifer Carroll assumed the office of Lieutenant Governor of Florida on January 4, 2011. She resigned on March 12, 2013, and the Governor explained the resignation was a result of her affiliation with a criminal conspiracy involving Allied Veterans of the World. Governor Rick Scott Statement of the Resignation of Lt. Gov. Jennifer Carroll (March 12, 2013 (available at: http://www.flgov.com/governor-rick-scott-statement-on-the-resignation-of-lt-govjennifer-carroll-2/) (last visited January 3, 2014). Various media reports indicated at the time that the Governor intended to wait until after the legislative session ended in May 2013 to start looking. E.g., 1

http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/stateroundup/who-might-be-rick-scottsnext-lieutenant-governor/2110144 (last visited January 3, 2014). The Governor has issued no press releases regarding the office since then and has offered no public guidance on when, if ever, he intends to appoint a successor. Florida Statute 14.055 provides: Upon vacancy in the office of Lieutenant Governor, the Governor shall appoint a successor who shall serve for the remainder of the term, provided that if after the appointment a vacancy occurs in the office of Governor with more than 28 months remaining in the term, at the next statewide general election the electors shall choose a Governor and Lieutenant Governor to fill the remainder of the term in the manner provided in s. 5, Art. IV of the State Constitution. There were less than 28 months remaining in her term when Lieutenant Governor Carroll resigned, and the responsibility fell squarely upon the Governor to appoint a successor upon that vacancy. Governor Scott has defied the Legislature s directive in section 14.055 by failing to appoint a successor to the position of Lieutenant Governor. The office has remained vacant for more than nine months since Lieutenant Governor Carroll s resignation and more than seven months since he promised to start looking after the legislative session ended. This refusal to follow the law upsets the order of succession the Legislature established in section 14.055. That statute provides that upon vacancy in the office of the Governor, the Lieutenant Governor shall become Governor. Thus, if the 2

Governor (who resigned his previous position as chief executive officer of a company that pled guilty to massive amounts of systematic fraud, including 14 felonies, leading to a historic $1.7 billion fine) resigns amid scandal like his lieutenant or dies, there is no Lieutenant Governor to fulfill the heavy responsibilities of the office. 1 Instead, the back-up succession rules clearly designed only for emergencies would require the Attorney General to leave her post to become Governor, further disrupting the orderly business of state government. 14.055. Worse, there would be a constitutional crisis if the Governor were to become physically or mentally incapacitated or were impeached. During times of incapacity or the time between impeachment and trial, section 14.056 provides for the Lieutenant Governor to become Acting Governor. While that statute addresses what happens should there then be a vacancy in the office of the person serving as Acting Governor, it has no provision for what should happen if the Lieutenant Governor position is vacant before there is an Acting Governor. See also art. IV, 3, Fla. Const. (providing that upon vacancy in the office of governor or [u]pon impeachment of the governor and until completion of trial thereof, or 1 Rick Scott, Former Healthcare CEO, Faces Questions About Past. http://www.politifact.com/florida/statements/2010/may/20/alex-sink/rick-scotthealthcare-ceo-faces-questions-a/ (Last accessed January 3, 2014) 3

during the governor s physical or mental incapacity, the lieutenant governor shall take over and [f]urther succession shall be prescribed by law ). Succession is not the sole concern. Section 376.13(1), Florida Statutes, the Governor has the authority to declare an emergency based on an oil spill and take immediate emergency action. The statute further provides that [i]f the Governor is unavailable, then the Lieutenant Governor can take action in his stead. Id. Thus, at present, if there is another oil spill and the Governor is unavailable for whatever reason, the state will be powerless to respond. Barbara DeVane is a citizen of the United States and a taxpaying resident of the State of Florida. Both as a taxpayer and concerned citizen, and as a former Social Studies teacher, she has an interest in ensuring the Governor complies with the law and the current threat to the orderly administration of state government is eliminated. NATURE OF THE RELIEF SOUGHT The relief sought is a writ of mandamus directing the Governor to appoint a Lieutenant Governor within a reasonable period of time of no less than 30 days. ARGUMENT Under article V, section 3(b)(8) of the Florida Constitution, this Court has jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus to state officers such as the Governor. E.g., Pleus v. Crist, 14 So. 3d 941, 942 & 942 n.3 (Fla. 2009). In order to obtain a writ 4

of mandamus, petitioners must have a clear legal right to the requested relief, the respondent must have an indisputable legal duty to perform the requested action, and the petitioner must have no other adequate remedy available. Id. at 945. All three elements are present in this case. I. PETITIONER HAS A CLEAR LEGAL RIGHT AS CITIZEN AND TAXPAYER TO REQUEST MANDAMUS RELIEF. At the outset, Petitioner has a clear legal right as a citizen and taxpayer to request mandamus relief to compel the Governor to carry out an indisputable legal duty concerning the appointment of a Lieutenant Governor. Pleus, 14 So. 3d at 945 (finding retired judge had clear legal right as citizen and taxpayer to demand that the governor choose his replacement from the list certified by the JNC via mandamus petition). As a former Social Studies teacher she taught students that no person is above the law, not even a Governor. II. THE GOVERNOR HAS A CLEAR LEGAL DUTY TO FILL THE VACANCY IN THE OFFICE OF LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR. The Governor has a clear legal duty to appoint a Lieutenant Governor under section 14.055, which provides Upon vacancy in the office of Lieutenant Governor, the Governor shall appoint a successor who shall serve for the remainder of the term. The plain language provides that the Governor shall make the appointment. If the statute allowed the position to remain unfilled it would provide the Governor may appoint a successor, but it does not. There is 5

simply no reasonable way to construe this provision to authorize the Governor to perpetually refuse to perform his duty. Moreover, this is not a duty that the Governor can choose to undertake when he feels like it. The statute directs him to make the appointment [u]pon vacancy. The term upon means at the time of, and clearly does not mean several months later. For example, this Court has concluded that a statute authorizing the Governor to reinstate a suspended state officer upon satisfactory evidence that the charges are untrue may and should be given their natural meaning. State ex rel. Kelly v. Sullivan, 52 So. 2d 422, 427 (Fla. 1951). The Court concluded that that the phrase may be read and understood to mean as soon as he has received the information, and it therefore rejected the contention that the Governor lacked the power to immediately reinstate the subject officer. Id. Indeed, a wide variety of Florida decisions consistently interpret the word upon to mean at the same time of, as opposed to some point in time significantly earlier or sooner. E.g., Rogers v. Bandy, 182 So. 281, 283 (Fla. 1938); Dean v. Crews, 81 So. 479, 480 (Fla. 1919); Careerxchange, Inc. v. Unemployment Appeals Com n, 916 So. 2d 68, 70 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); Lawyer v. Munro, 118 So. 2d 654, 656 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960); see also Gordon v. State, 901 So. 2d 399, 403 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (interpreting the word in its special sense, but noting that the word is regularly employed as a simple 6

equivalent of on, in all the varieties of meaning which that proposition has developed (quoting XIX Oxford English Dictionary 299, 300 (2d ed. 1989)). While Petitioner does not assert that the appointment must come at the exact second of the resignation, something that often would be impossible, there is no reasonable reading of the term that would allow the Governor to shirk his duties for months on end as he has here. It is also important to note that Petitioner is not seeking to compel the Governor to choose any particular individual. All Petitioner seeks in this case is an order compelling the Governor to adhere to his duty to make an appointment and do it now. See Pleus, 14 So. 3d at 945 (concluding that mandamus lies to compel Governor to adhere to his duty to make an appointment given that Court was not directing the Governor s discretionary decision as to the actual appointment ). III. PETITIONER HAS NO OTHER ADEQUATE REMEDY. Mandamus is the only adequate remedy available to Petitioner given that the circumstances here call for an immediate resolution. E.g., Brown v. Firestone, 382 So. 2d 654, 662 (Fla. 1980); Pleus, 14 So. 3d at 946. Pleus involved a six-month delay in filling a judicial vacancy; its principles are equally applicable here where the Governor has taken more than nine months to fill the second highest office in the Executive Branch. The law provides that the Governor shall appoint a successor and we ask that the Court direct the Governor to fulfill his duty. 7

CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, this Court should issue a writ of mandamus compelling the Governor to comply with the mandate of section 14.055 and fill the vacancy in the office of Lieutenant Governor forthwith. /s/ Donald M. Hinkle Donald M. Hinkle Florida Bar No. 301027 HINKLE & FORAN 3500 Financial Plaza, Suite 350 Tallahassee, FL 32312 (850) 205-2055 Fax: (850) 205-2056 don@hinkleforan.com Attorney for Petitioner CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy hereof has been furnished to Peter Antonacci, General Counsel, Office of the Governor, Tallahassee, Florida, by email at peter.antonacci@eog.myflorida.com, on this 6 th day of January, 2014: /s/ Donald M. Hinkle Donald M. Hinkle 8

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing brief is in Times New Roman 14- point font and complies with the font requirements of Rule 9.210(a)(2), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. /s/ Donald M. Hinkle Donald M. Hinkle 9