Defendant answers as follows:

Similar documents
FILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 07/31/ :58 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 70 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/31/2018

Quicken Loans Inc. v Diaz-Montez 2015 NY Slip Op 31285(U) March 13, 2015 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: /2014 Judge: Robert J.

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 07/28/ :44 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 20 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/28/2017

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT. 1. This is a case where CHAUNCEY MAGGIACOMO (the Defendant ) took

NOTICE YOU ARE IN DANGER OF LOSING YOUR HOME

Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v McLean-Chance 2013 NY Slip Op 32606(U) October 17, 2013 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 11828/2012 Judge:

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 04/13/ :15 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 55 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/13/2018

Foreclosure Litigation Overview

Equity Recovery Corp. v Kahal Minchas Chinuch of Tartikov 2014 NY Slip Op 32617(U) September 22, 2014 Sup Ct, Kings County Docket Number: /14

The 2008 Florida Statutes

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/03/ :12 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 49 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/03/2017

JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. v Jacob 2016 NY Slip Op 32095(U) September 6, 2016 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 20755/2013 Judge: Robert J.

Chapter 355. (House Bill 728) Residential Property Foreclosure Required Documents Timing of Mediation

HOPP Webinar: Is it too Late?

Definitions of Terms Used in Small Claims Court

LANDLORD AND TENANT FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 10/26/ :38 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 22 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/26/2016 EXHIBIT A

FILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 10/07/ /24/ :55 10:55 PM AM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/07/2015

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/01/ :49 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/01/2017

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Newbank v Parcare Servs. Inc NY Slip Op 30200(U) January 30, 2013 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 30639/2010 Judge: Robert J.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. This Court s Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY FAYETTE CIRCUIT COURT DIVISION 8 CASE NO. 09-CI-6405

BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP v Douglin 2013 NY Slip Op 31398(U) June 28, 2013 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 18002/2010 Judge: Sidney F.

CHAPTER House Bill No. 617

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/14/ :52 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/14/2016

U.S. Bank, N.A. v Campbell 2015 NY Slip Op 30390(U) March 16, 2015 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 11601/2012 Judge: Robert J.

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 02/04/2014 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/04/2014

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/14/ :44 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/14/2016

Compulsory Arbitration

Title 14: COURT PROCEDURE -- CIVIL

Cause Number (Complete the heading so it looks exactly like the Petition) In the (check one):

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION

Statutes of Limitations in Residential Foreclosure Actions

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/09/ :06 PM

STANDING COMMITTEE ON RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULES CHANGES. The Rules Committee has submitted its One Hundred Seventy-

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/18/ :11 PM

(Space Above Reserved for Recording Data)

HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Rodney 2016 NY Slip Op 30761(U) April 12, 2016 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: /2015 Judge: Robert J.

FILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 06/03/ :22 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/03/2015

Servicemembers Civil Relief Act TITLE 50. WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE TITLE 50 APPENDIX. WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE

Referred to Committee on Judiciary. SUMMARY Revises provisions relating to the Foreclosure Mediation Program. (BDR 9-488)

Soroush v Citimortgage, Inc NY Slip Op 32750(U) January 7, 2016 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: /2015 Judge: Salvatore J.

Title 14: COURT PROCEDURE -- CIVIL

FILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 04/24/ :10 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 51 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/24/2018

Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Unknown Heirs of the Estate of Souto 2016 NY Slip Op 31274(U) July 5, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket

Citimortgage Inc. v Mulazhanov 2018 NY Slip Op 33236(U) November 27, 2018 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: /17 Judge: Darrell L.

VA Form (Home Loan) Revised October 1983, Use Optional. Section 1810, Title 38, U.S.C. Acceptable to Federal National Mortgage Association

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/16/ :13 PM INDEX NO /2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/16/2018

Ventures Trust 2013-I-H-R v Tsimmer 2017 NY Slip Op 30570(U) March 23, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /15 Judge: Barbara

ENFORCEMENT AND COLLECTION ISSUES IN COMMUNITY ASSOCIATIONS MICHAEL C. KIM MICHAEL C. KIM & ASSOCIATES

Estates of Hallet's Cove Homeowners Assoc. Inc. v Fakir 2016 NY Slip Op 32083(U) July 22, 2016 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 10962/2014

New York Community Bank v Florio 2013 NY Slip Op 30814(U) April 3, 2013 Sup Ct, Suffolk County Docket Number: Judge: Elizabeth H.

Wachovia Bank of Delaware, NA v Henderson 2015 NY Slip Op 31324(U) June 19, 2015 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 16701/2010 Judge: Robert

TO THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK:

Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC v Victor Horsford Realty Corp NY Slip Op 30077(U) January 20, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:

SHAWNEE BASS JUSTICE OF THE PEACE ERATH COUNTY, PRECINCT 1 SMALL CLAIMS

FILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 03/30/ :14 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 62 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/30/2018

FORECLOSURE FAQ WHERE IS A FORECLOSURE COMPLAINT FILED?

Justice Court Civil Cases in PANOLA County

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 04/21/ :00 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 88 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/21/2017

DISTRICT COURT DIVISION FILE NO -CVD-, : PARTIES, JURISDICTION AND VENUE

CHAPTER 77 GARNISHMENT

RULE 4:64. Foreclosure Of Mortgages, Condominium Association Liens And Tax Sale Certificates

Wells Fargo Bank v Ghosh 2010 NY Slip Op 32181(U) August 9, 2010 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 9027/2007 Judge: Denis J. Butler Republished

Emigrant Bank v Greene 2015 NY Slip Op 31343(U) February 24, 2015 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: /2014 Judge: Allan B.

SHAWNEE BASS JUSTICE OF THE PEACE ERATH COUNTY, PRECINCT 1 EVICTIONS

GRANDPARENT VISITATION FORM PACKET

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

CHAPTER DEEDS OF TRUST

Citimortgage, Inc. v Sirota 2013 NY Slip Op 31659(U) July 22, 2013 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 12243/2011 Judge: Allan B.

Case 2:15-cv MJP Document 10 Filed 04/06/16 Page 1 of 8

ASSEMBLY, No. 705 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2018 SESSION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA,

Senate Bill No. 306 Senators Ford and Hammond

SERVICEMEMBERS CIVIL RELIEF ACT ( SCRA ) 50 U.S.C. App b 1

GENERAL INFORMATION FOR FILING SUIT IN JUSTICE COURT

FORM 5- COMPLAINT FOR LANDLORD TO EVICT TENANTS FORM 5A COMPLAINT FOR LANDLORD TO EVICT TENANTS FOR FAILURE TO PAY RENT AND TO RECOVER PAST DUE RENT

2016 NY Slip Op Troy, New York Henry F. Zwack, J.

Fabtastic Abode, LLC v Arcella 2014 NY Slip Op 31611(U) June 24, 2014 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: /2012 Judge: Mark I.

THIS MORTGAGE dated as of the day of, 20., a body corporate, whose

- against - NOTICE OF MOTION

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 09/13/13 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1

PROCEDURE TO FILE AN EVICTION

MEMORANDUM DECISION NEW YORK SUPREME COURT - QUEENS COUNTY. PRESENT: HON. ORIN R. KITZES PART 17 Justice

The Bank of New York Mellon, f/k/a The Bank of New York, as Trustee on behalf of

U.S. Bank Natl. Assn. v Bethelmie 2012 NY Slip Op 31773(U) June 29, 2012 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 15315/2009 Judge: Robert J.

FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 09/30/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 69 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/30/2016. Exhibit 15

Case 4:10-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/18/10 Page 1 of 9

MAGISTRATE COURT OF FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA 185 Central Avenue, SW, Suite TG-100, Atlanta, GA 30303

LaSalle Bank, N.A. v Rodriguez 2011 NY Slip Op 31086(U) April 28, 2011 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 5129/07 Judge: Allan B.


PORTIONS OF ILLINOIS FORCIBLE ENTRY AND DETAINER ACT 735 ILCS 5/9-101 et. seq.

CHAPTER Council Substitute for House Bill No. 1285

REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT. accordance with the amended complaint filed herewith.

EXHIBIT F FAIR OAKS RANCH NEIGHBORHOOD HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION ASSESSMENT COLLECTION POLICY

FIFTH DISTRICT. PRESIDING JUSTICE STEWART delivered the opinion of the court:

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO

Transcription:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF, Plaintiff INDEX NO: -against- VERIFIED ANSWER TO FORECLOSURE COMPLAINT, Defendant. Defendant answers as follows: General Denial I plead the following Defenses and Counterclaims: Lack of Standing: Plaintiff, upon information and belief, does not own the note and mortgage. Plaintiff therefore does not have standing to sue because it was not the legal owner of the note and/or mortgage at the time it commenced this foreclosure lawsuit. Foreclosure Cause of Action: Plaintiff, upon information and belief, does not own the note and mortgage. Because ownership of the note and mortgage is an element of a foreclosure cause of action, Plaintiff has no right to foreclose. Statute of Limitations (NY Civil Practice Law and Rules 213(4)): Upon information and belief, Plaintiff may not sue on all or part of the mortgage debt because Plaintiff commenced this action more than six years after the debt became due. Additionally, the entire foreclosure action is time-barred by the statute of limitations because Plaintiff commenced this action more than six years after it accelerated the mortgage debt. Defendant requests that the mortgage be cancelled and discharged pursuant to NY Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law 1501(4). 1

Improper Service of the Summons and Complaint (NY Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 308): I was not properly served with the Summons and Complaint in any of the following three methods: 1. A copy of the Summons and Complaint were not handed to me in person; OR 2. A copy of the Summons and Complaint were not left at my home or business with a person of suitable age and discretion with another copy mailed within 20 days to my home or business; OR 3. A copy of the Summons and Complaint were not attached to my home or business door, with another copy mailed within 20 days to my home or business. Notice of Default: Plaintiff failed to comply with the requirements for the notice of default in my mortgage loan agreement, a condition precedent to this foreclosure action. Reverse Mortgage Notice Requirement (NY Codes, Rules and Regulations Title 3, 79.9(a)(5)): Plaintiff failed to comply with the requirements of NY Codes, Rules and Regulations Title 3, 79.9(a)(5), a condition precedent to this foreclosure action. 90-Day Notice Requirement (NY Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law 1304): Plaintiff failed to comply with the requirements of NY Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law 1304, a condition precedent to this foreclosure action. 90-Day Notice Filing Requirement (NY Real Property and Proceedings Law 1306): Plaintiff failed to comply with the requirements of NY Real Property and Proceedings Law 1306, a condition precedent to this foreclosure action. Help for Homeowners in Foreclosure Notice Requirement (NY Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law Section 1303): I did not receive the notice Help for Homeowners in Foreclosure that was supposed to be served with the Foreclosure Summons and Complaint. Plaintiff failed to comply with the requirements of NY Real Property and Proceedings Law 1303, a condition precedent to this foreclosure action. Pending Foreclosure Action (NY Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law 1301): Plaintiff impermissibly commenced this action because there is a prior pending action to recover all or part of the mortgage debt. 2

Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act Early Intervention Requirement (12 C.F.R. 1024.39): Upon information and belief, Plaintiff violated the early intervention requirements of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act because (check one or both if applicable): Within 36 days of my delinquency, the loan servicer did not attempt to establish live contact with me to inform me about the availability of loss mitigation options. Within 45 days of my delinquency, the loan servicer did not send me a written notice that included contact information for the servicer, a description of loss mitigation options available from the servicer, information about applying for loss mitigation, and a website listing housing counselors. Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act Pre-Foreclosure Review Requirement (12 C.F.R. 1024.41): Plaintiff impermissibly filed this foreclosure during the preforeclosure review period because (check one or both if applicable): Plaintiff commenced this action before my loan was more than 120 days delinquent. I submitted a complete loss mitigation application to my loan servicer but Plaintiff commenced this action (1) before the loan servicer made a decision on that application, (2) before the time period to appeal the loan servicer s decision lapsed, or (3) before the loan servicer made a decision on an appeal I submitted in connection with the loss mitigation application. FHA Pre-Foreclosure Requirements: My loan is insured by the Federal Housing Administration. Upon information and belief, the loan servicer/mortgagee has not complied with regulations of the Department of Housing and Urban Development because the loan servicer/mortgagee did not do one or more of the following (check all that are applicable): Send me a notice of default before the end of the second month of my delinquency (24 C.F.R. 203.602). Attempt to arrange a face-to-face interview with me before three full monthly installments due under the mortgage were unpaid (24 C.F.R. 203.604). Evaluate me for loss mitigation before four full monthly installments due under the mortgage were unpaid (24 C.F.R. 203.605). Wait until three full monthly installments due under the mortgage were unpaid before commencing this foreclosure action (24 C.F.R. 203.606) 3

VA Pre-Foreclosure Requirements: My mortgage is guaranteed by the VA pursuant to Title 38 of the United States Code. The loan servicer has not complied with the regulations requiring that the servicer extend all reasonable forbearance options. Compliance with these regulations is a condition precedent to foreclose. Further, failure to comply with these rules gives rise to equitable defenses to this action. Active Service Member Protections (Federal Service Members Civil Relief Act, 50 App. U.S.C. 501 et seq.; and New York State Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act, NY Military Law Section 300 et seq.): An active service member is an owner of the property and is on the mortgage and qualifies for Active Military Service protections under state or local law. Certificate of Merit Requirement (NY Civil Practice Law and Rules 3012-b): Upon information and belief, Plaintiff failed to comply with the Certificate of Merit requirements of NY Civil Practice Law and Rules 3012-b. Request for Judicial Intervention (NY Codes, Rules and Regulations Title 22, 202.12-a(b)): Upon information and belief, Plaintiff did not file a Request for Judicial Intervention. Attorney s Fees (NY Real Property Law 282): If I retain counsel, I am entitled to recover my attorney s fees in defending this action pursuant to New York Real Property Law 282. Excessive Interest (NY Civil Practice Law and Rules 5001(a)): Plaintiff has unreasonably delayed filing this action, failed to file the Request for Judicial Intervention or engaged in other dilatory conduct causing excessive interest to accrue which the Court may reduce or toll, as a matter of equity and by operation of the CPLR. Excessive Interest and Fees (NY Civil Practice Law and Rules 3408(f)): In a prior foreclosure action, Plaintiff failed to negotiate in good faith pursuant to CPLR 3408(f). This failure to negotiate in good faith has caused excessive interest and fees to accrue which Plaintiff, as a matter of equity and by operation of the CPLR, is not entitled to recover. Action Commenced Against a Deceased Party: This action is a nullity because it was commenced against Defendant after that party was already deceased and it should, therefore, be dismissed. Refused Payments: I have tried to tender payments which would have paid the principal, interest, and fees I owed at the time in full, but the lender refused to accept the payment and proceeded to foreclosure against me wrongfully. 4

Partial or Full Payment: I have made payments which have not been properly credited and are not reflected in the Complaint. Other explanation or additional information: Origination Issues: On the date of loan origination, statements were made to intentionally convince me to enter the mortgage and note at issue in this foreclosure action. I relied upon those statements and I was fraudulently induced to sign the mortgage and note. I was told that: I would receive a fixed rate loan, but instead I received an adjustable rate loan. My mortgage term would be for a shorter term than I actually received. My total monthly payment would include principal, interest, property taxes and insurance, but instead my monthly payment only included principal and interest. My monthly payment would be lower than the resulting monthly payment I actually received. My loan amount would be for a lower amount than I actually received. Other Additional Information: I was injured by the above fraudulent statements because I paid more for my mortgage than I could afford and ultimately fell into foreclosure as a result of the higher cost of the mortgage. Other Defenses or Counterclaims (attach additional pages if needed): Other Facts Concerning Your Mortgage (attach additional pages if needed): 5

Wherefore, Defendant requests that the Complaint be dismissed; that the relief requested by Defendant be granted in its entirety; that Defendant be granted costs and attorneys fees if he or she retains counsel; and any other relief allowed by law deemed just and proper by this Court in the exercise of its equity jurisdiction in this foreclosure action. Dated:, 20, New York, Defendant Pro Se (Defendant s Signature) (Defendant s Name) (Defendant s Address) (Defendant s Address) (Defendant s Telephone Number) Prepared with the assistance of counsel admitted in New York. 6

VERIFICATION I,, being duly sworn, state that the within Answer is true to the best of my knowledge, except as to those matters alleged upon information and belief, which I believe to be true (Defendant s Name) (Defendant s Signature) Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of, 20 Notary Public 7