UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OMARI BOBO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

Similar documents
Case 2:18-cv R-AGR Document 7 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:26

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:14-cv WBS-EFB Document 14 Filed 08/07/14 Page 1 of 5

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:13-cv EMC Document 736 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

)

SAMPLE FORM F NOTICE DESIGNATING RECORD ON APPEAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION } } } } } } } } } } } } } } /

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Fresno County Superior Court, Case No. 1OCECGO2 116 The Honorable Jeffrey Y. Hamilton, Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

a. Name of person served:

AS MODIFIED. Attorneys for Plaintiff, STERLING SAVINGS BANK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

in furtherance of and in response to its Tentative Decision dated 1/4/2010 addressing various matters

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION 2. CALGUNS FOUNDATION INC., et al v. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO

Case 2:12-cv PSG-RZ Document 1 Filed 10/10/12 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER ANSWERING A BREACH OF CONTRACT COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

FAX. IN TUE SUPERIOR COURT OF TUE STATE OF caiafornia INANDFORTHLCQLNTYOELOSANELES. EAST l)i$trict

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

Case 2:00-cv GAF-RC Document 435 Filed 05/14/13 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:1893

Part Description 1 5 pages 2 Proposed Order Proposed Order to Motion for Summary Judgment

1 The parties to this action, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to. 2 the following:

copy 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff CALMAT CO. dba VTJLCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, WESTERN DIVISION 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER

LODGED. MHY p CLERK, QS DISTRICT COL VIRAL DISTRICT OF CA i, F,, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNI A

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Attorneys for Defendant and Respondent CITY OF ANAHEIM SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

Case M:06-cv VRW Document 424 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 5

REQUEST FOR PUBLICATION OF OPINION. Andre Torigian v. WT Capital Lender Services Case No. F (Fresno County Superior Court No.

OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY ROCKARD J. DELGADILLO CITY ATTORNEY REPORT RE: COURT RULING

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SELF-HELP CENTER ALTERNATIVE WRIT OF MANDATE NON DUI. Self Help Center Loca ons:

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. Plaintiffs and Appellants, Defendants and Res ondents.

This matter came on regularly before this Court for hearings on October 7,2004 and on April

DISTRICT COURT, FAMILY DIVISION CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

c - _: _ April 10, 2012 Re: officials whc)worktogether and combinetheir resources so that they may influence.

Case3:11-cv WHA Document33 Filed01/06/12 Page1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Plaintiffs,

18 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CIV CIV DS ORDR Order GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF

HAROLD P. STURGEON, Plaintiff and Petitioner, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants and Respondents, and

IIAR CONN )14)R1) toliv

2:11-cv R -JCG Document 58 Filed 01/06/12 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:699

TO BE FILED IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

vs. ) NOTICE OF RULING 14 )

Case 3:08-cv VRW Document 9 Filed 07/23/2008 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 5:12-cv EJD Document 1134 Filed 01/27/16 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT GRANTING PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (OAKLAND DIVISION)

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Plaintiff{s),

LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL D.

Case3:12-cv JCS Document47 Filed09/28/12 Page1 of 8

Exempt from filing fee Gov't Code Secs. 6100, 6103 NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY OF COUNSEL

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES UNLIMITED JURISDICTION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

EV22fl $ JEFFREY R. KRINSK, State Bar No FINKELSTEIN & KRINS K UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNI A

DEC 1 i1z ) FOR DEFENDANTS DEMURRER TO ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ) ) Time: 439-pm.3) C.D. Michel -

IN THE TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CHURCHILL

Gk) AUo Superior Court of California CountY of Los Angeles. Sherri R. Carter, xecutive ofricer/clerk Deputv

Case 2:13-bk ER Doc 245 Filed 03/12/15 Entered 03/12/15 14:35:11 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

1 Justice, on January 9, A copy of the Proof of Service of Summons is attached hereto. 4 Dated: January 27, 2015 MICHEL & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

No [DC# CV MJJ] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. RUSSELL ALLEN NORDYKE; et al., Plaintiffs - Appellants,

Jonathan Arvizu v. City of Pasadena Request for Publication Second District Case No.: B Superior Court Case No.: BC550929

Case 6:11-ap SC Doc 14 Filed 12/08/11 Entered 12/08/11 15:28:33 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 5

West Lincoln Avenue Tel: (714) of the Long Beach Pediatric Surgery

Case5:12-cv HRL Document9 Filed08/09/12 Page1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Benjamin v. Google Inc. Doc. 45

Case 3:09-cv IEG -BGS Document 55 Filed 11/08/10 Page 1 of 5

Case 3:04-cr JAH Document 309 Filed 01/17/13 PageID.1104 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:07-cv TJH-CT Document 56 Filed 11/29/2007 Page 1 of 6

By S. Lee, Deputy Clerk

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

Case 3:08-cv BEN-BLM Document 3 Filed 06/17/2008 Page 1 of 2

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

Case 5:15-cv VAP-KK Document 73 Filed 12/04/15 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #:2332

F ADV.NOTICE.LODGMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Petitioner. Respondent. Real Party in Interest.

Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF KERN, NORTH KERN DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:15-cr SVW Document 173 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 61 Page ID #:2023

MOTION TO STRIKE OPENING BRIEF; PROPOSED ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. [Complaint Filed 11/24/2010] [Alameda County Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Request for Publication

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETT S CLASS ACTION JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:09-cv DOC-RZ Document 72 Filed 08/31/10 Page 1 of 37 Page ID #:992

Transcription:

Case :-cv-000-ben-dhb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 Jeffrey R. Krinsk, Esq. (SBN 0) jrk@classactionlaw.com Mark L. Knutson, Esq. (SBN 0) mlk@classactionlaw.com William R. Restis, Esq. (SBN ) wrr@classactionlaw.com Trenton R. Kashima, Esq. (SBN 0) trk@classactionlaw.com 0 West C St., Suite 0 San Diego, California 0 Telephone: () - Facsimile: () - Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Putative Classes UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OMARI BOBO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, WOODBOLT DISTRIBUTION, LLC, d/b/a Cellucor and Nutrabolt, a Delaware limited liability company, Defendant. Case No: -cv-000-ben-dhb NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO PLAINTIFF S INDIVIDUAL CLAIMS AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO ANY CLAIMS OF ABSENT PUTATIVE CLASS MEMBERS Judge: Hon. Roger T. Benitez NOTICE OF DISMISSAL -cv-000-ben-dhb

Case :-cv-000-ben-dhb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 TO THE CLERK OF THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AND ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Omari Bobo, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (a)(), hereby voluntarily dismisses the above-entitled action against Defendant Woodbolt Distribution, LLC, d/b/a Cellucor and Nutrabolt, with prejudice as to his individual claims, but without prejudicing any claims of absent putative class members. Before Defendant served Plaintiff with its answer, or a motion for summary judgment, the parties were able to reach an agreement resolving all of the claims and causes of action asserted. FED. R. CIV. P. (a)()(a)(i) (allowing plaintiff to dismiss an action without a court order by filing a notice of dismissal). A class has not been certified in this action; thus, this voluntary dismissal does not implicate the requirements of Rule (e). FED. R. CIV. P. (e) ( The claims, issues, or defenses of a certified class may be settled, voluntarily dismissed, or compromised only with the court's approval. ); Committee Notes on Rule 0 Amendment ( The new rule requires approval only if the claims, issues, or defenses of a certified class are resolved by a settlement, voluntary dismissal, or compromise. ) DATED: February, NOTICE OF DISMISSAL -- Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Trenton R. Kashima Trenton R. Kashima, Esq. Jeffrey R. Krinsk, Esq. Mark L. Knutson, Esq. William R. Restis, Esq. 0 West C St., Suite 0 San Diego, CA 0- Telephone: () - Facsimile: () - -cv-000-ben-dhb

Case :-cv-000-ben-dhb Document - Filed 0/0/ Page of Jeffrey R. Krinsk, Esq. (SBN 0) jr~~classactionlaw.com Mark L. Knutson! Esq. (SBN 0) mlk@classaction aw.com Wilham R. Restis, Esq. (SBN ) wrr@classactionlaw.com Trenton R. Kashima, Esq. (SBN 0) trk~classactionlaw.com <JWest C St.~ Suite 0 San Diego, CalIfornia 0 Telephone: () - FacsImile: () - Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Putative Classes 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OMARI BOBO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated" Plaintiff, Case No: -cv-00-ben DHB v. WOODBOLT DISTRIBUTION, LLC, d/b/a Cellucor and Nutrabolt, a Delaware limited liability company, Defendants. I, the undersigned, declare that I am over the age of eighteen () years and not a party to the within action. I am employed in the County of San Diego, State of California. My business address is 0 W. C Street, Suite 0, San Diego, California 0. I served the following document(s) on February,: Notice of Volutary Dismissal with Prejudice as to Plaintiff's Individual Claims and Without Prejudice as to Any Claims of Absent Putative Class Members -cv"()() REN DHR

Case :-cv-000-ben-dhb Document - Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 On the person(s) listed below: Michael J. DiMaggio General Counsel ~ Chief Legal Officer Woodbolt DistributionlNutrabolt mdimaiio~utrabolt.com Tel.: () -0 By the following means: VIA U.S. MAIL: I enclosed the documents in a sealed envelope or package addressed to the ~rson(s) at the address( es) listed above. I placed the envelope for collection and mailing, following our ordinary business practices. I am readily familiar with this business's practice for collecting and processing corresp'ondence for mailing. On the same day that corresponoence is place for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course ofbusiness with the United States Postal Service, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid. VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY: I enclosed the documents in an envelope or package provided by an. overnight delivery carrier and addressed to the person(s) at the address hsted above. I placed the envelo~ or package for collectio~ and ov:ernight d~livery to an office or a regularly utilized drop 0x of the overnight dehvery camero VIA FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION: Based on an agreement of the parties to accept service by fax transmission, I faxed the documents to the pet:son( s) at the fax number(s) listed above. No error was reported by the fax machine that I used. A copy of the record of the fax transmission, which I printed out, is attached. xx VIA ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION: Based on a court order or agreement of the parties to accept electronic service, I caused the documents to be sent to the person( s) at the electronic service address( es) listed above. VIA NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING (ECJr): Electronic Services via the Court's CMlECF system pursuant to CivLR S.(c). VIA PERSONAL SERVICE: I P.ersonall):' delivered the documents to the person(s) at the address(es) listed above. 0) For a party represented by an attorney, delivery was made to the attorney or at the attorney.'s office by leaving the documents, in an envelope or package clearly' labeled to identify the attorney being served with a receptionist or an individual in charge of the office, between the nours of nine In the morning and five in the evening. () For a party delivery was made to the party or by I leaving the documents at the p.arty~s reside!ce ~ith some person nc?t younger th~ l~ years of age between the hours ofeight In the morning and SIX In the evemng. PR.ooF OF SERVICE -cv-00 BEN ORR

Case :-cv-000-ben-dhb Document - Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United State of America, that the foregoing is true and correct and that I am employed in the office, at whose direction the within service was made. Executed: February,, at San Diego, California. ~~ Rebecka A. Garcia l Hi-cv-00 RF.N DHR