Volume 4. Forging an Empire: Bismarckian Germany, Franz Hitze, The Quintessence of the Social Question (1880)

Similar documents
Volume 8. Occupation and the Emergence of Two States, Political Principles of the Social Democratic Party (May 1946)

Karl Marx ( )

Vladimir Lenin, Extracts ( )

* Economies and Values

Land, Labor, and Property. Jean-Guillaume-César-Alexandre-Hippolyte de Colins

Reflection & Connection Task

UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION 3201 (S-VI): DECLARATION

Volume 5. Wilhelmine Germany and the First World War, Socialist Revisionism : The Immediate Tasks of Social Democracy (1899)

Since this chapter looks at economics systems and globalization, we will also be adding Chapter 15 which deals with international trade.

Economic Theory: How has industrial development changed living and working conditions?

PROCEEDINGS THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE AGRICULTURAL ECONOMISTS

Communism. Marx and Engels. The Communism Manifesto

Contrasting Cold War Terms. Communism v. Democracy

Subverting the Orthodoxy

SSWH 15 Presentation. Describe the impact of industrialization and urbanization.

Manifesto of the Communist Party

The Marxist Critique of Liberalism

A Moral Case for Socialism. Kai Nielsen Intro to Philosophy Professor Doug Olena

Decentralism, Centralism, Marxism, and Anarchism. Wayne Price

The difference between Communism and Socialism

Magruder s American Government

RUSSIA FROM REVOLUTION TO 1941

I. Patriotism and Revolution

Capitalism: Good or Evil?

Wayne Price A Maoist Attack on Anarchism

Teacher Overview Objectives: Karl Marx: The Communist Manifesto

Chapter 2: American Citizens and Political Culture Test Bank. Multiple Choice

Do Classes Exist the USSR? By S. M. Zhurovkov, M.S.

Volume 10. One Germany in Europe Chancellor Angela Merkel Defends her Gradual Approach to Reforms (November 27, 2006)

I. The Agricultural Revolution

CHAPTER 2: SECTION 1. Economic Systems

Stratification: Rich and Famous or Rags and Famine? 2015 SAGE Publications, Inc.

Chapter 1 The Study of American Government

Note Taking Study Guide DAWN OF THE INDUSTRIAL AGE

Article 31 Freedom of Association

The Alternative to Capitalism? Wayne Price

Station 2 The people are represented in two ways: as states in the Senate and as 435 equally-populated, singlemember districts in the House of Represe

Rev. Kenneth Himes, OFM Professor and Chairperson, Theology Department, Boston College

INEQUALITY: POVERTY AND WEALTH CHAPTER 2

CHAPTER I CONSTITUTION OF THE CHINESE SOVIET REPUBLIC

Illinois Redistricting Collaborative Talking Points Feb. Update

LAO PEOPLE S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC PEACE INDEPENDENCE DEMOCRACY UNITY PROSPERITY

Glasnost and the Intelligentsia

BELGIUM UNDER THE GERMAN OCCUPATION. (1916) A PERSONAL NARRATIVE 2 Brand WHITLOCK Chapter XXXIII. The press-gangs. Translation :

CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ICELAND 1 (No. 33, 17 June 1944, as amended 30 May 1984, 31 May 1991, 28 June 1995 and 24 June 1999)

Reading Essentials and Study Guide

World History Chapter 25

Bell Ringer: February 10(14), 2017

COMPARATIVE ECONOMIC SYSTEMS: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE BEFORE YOU BEGIN

Radical Equality as the Purpose of Political Economy. The ruling ideas of each age have ever been the ideas of its ruling class.

POL 343 Democratic Theory and Globalization February 11, "The history of democratic theory II" Introduction

Karl Marx. Louis Blanc

On 1st May 2018 on the 200th anniversary of the birth of Karl Marx, and on the 170th anniversary of the first issue of Il Manifesto of the Communist

CH 17: The European Moment in World History, Revolutions in Industry,

What is Democratic Socialism?

Reconsider Marx s Democracy Theory

New German Critique and Duke University Press are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to New German Critique.

Hayek's Road to Serfdom 1

Interpreting and Translation : Meeting the Legal Rights of Non-Native Citizens

The Napoleonic Era

Source:

8 THE THEORY OF CAPITALISM

World History Chapter 25

Democratic Renewal in American Society 2018 Democracy Discussions

DEMOCRATS DIGEST. A Monthly Newsletter of the Conference of Young Nigerian Democrats. Inside this Issue:

Amendment (with title amendment)

POLI 111: INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF POLITICAL SCIENCE Session 8-Political Culture

Chapter 7 Institutions and economics growth

1. What specific activities does Article 3 of the Constitution of 1917 outlawing?

Absolute Monarchy In an absolute monarchy, the government is totally run by the headof-state, called a monarch, or more commonly king or queen. They a

LOW VOTER TURNOUT INTERVIEW ROLE PLAY

Women s economic empowerment in the changing world of work

2011 HIGH LEVEL MEETING ON YOUTH General Assembly United Nations New York July 2011

Originates in France during the French Revolution, after Louis XVI is executed. Spreads across Europe as Napoleon builds his empire by conquering

Civics Lesson Objectives

POLI 101: September 3, Lecture #4: Liberalism and its Critics

HUMAN RESOURCES MIGRATION FROM RURAL TO URBAN WORK SPHERES

Essential Question: How did both the government and workers themselves try to improve workers lives?

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE TANZANIA COUNTRY RISK ASSESSMENT

netw rks The Resurgence of Conservatism, Ronald Reagan s Inauguration Background

(No ) (Approved March 30, 2011) AN ACT

Part IV Population, Labour and Urbanisation

Chapter 16: Attempts at Liberty

SOCIALISM. Social Democracy / Democratic Socialism. Marxism / Scientific Socialism

In Refutation of Instant Socialist Revolution in India

TRADE COMPETITION ACT B.E *

Politics and Prosperity ( )

Address to the Italian Proletariat On the Current Possibilities for Social Revolution 1

Economic Systems. Essential Questions. How do different societies around the world meet their economic systems?

John Stuart Mill ( ) Branch: Political philosophy ; Approach: Utilitarianism Over his own body and mind, the individual is sovereign

IV. Social Stratification and Class Structure

The Revolt of the Poor and a Limited Monarchy

NATIONAL BOLSHEVISM IN A NEW LIGHT

Socialist Party Convention:

Topic 3: The Rise and Rule of Single-Party States (USSR and Lenin/Stalin) Pipes Chapter 4


The College Board Advanced Placement Examination. AMERICAN HISTORY SECTION I1 (Suggested writing time-40 minutes)

of strengthening democracy through market-oriented reform Article at a glance

CONSTITUTION DAY GUIDE

11/7/2011. Section 1: Answering the Three Economic Questions. Section 2: The Free Market

Transcription:

Volume 4. Forging an Empire: Bismarckian Germany, 1866-1890 Franz Hitze, The Quintessence of the Social Question (1880) A number of Catholic thinkers also focused on the social question. This excerpt is from The Quintessence of the Social Question (1880), written by the Catholic theologian and social reformer Franz Hitze (1851-1921). Hitze advocated a type of corporative socialism that differed from the program of Social Democracy in many ways. One of the most important points of divergence was Hitze s argument that the state should not take the lead in propping up or reforming the existing social order. That task, in his view, should be undertaken by selfregulated occupational estates similar to traditional guilds. In this way, he believed, civil society could in essence heal itself. In a footnote Hitze also argued that parliamentary representation of competing social interests should also be refashioned on a corporatist basis by means of a new electoral law. Socialism intends to level and mechanize everything. The state is supposed to be supreme and to take exclusive charge of all production and distribution. With this, socialism is taken to the extreme. This is not justifiable as an ideal, or in keeping with justice (the existing right of ownership), or practically feasible, or finally correct in terms of factual prerequisites (the generally prevalent large-scale operations). Socialism must exist because and insofar as the production method is socialistic. Not all branches of production are equally socialistic; therefore, neither is the legal socialism that is to be introduced. The result of this is that, strictly according to socialistic principles, socialism has to become associated with the special large-scale branches of production. In other words, socialism can only assume a corporative structure. The socialistic organization of occupational groups seems to us to be the solution to the social question. Such a structure is nothing new: the Middle Ages had it. The guilds were socialistic organizations whose socialism vis-à-vis personal liberty, as well as personal property and occupational rights, went much too far in many cases (in the later period), just as liberalism, on the other end of the scale, goes much too far with its absolute personal freedom and its absolute personal property and occupational rights. In their essence, however, the guilds were a model of property and labor organization. Thus, a guild-like organization of all our occupational categories appears to us as the goal of the future, as the only way to break the supremacy of capital and the machine, so as to utilize the advances in production for the general public. And to repeat: this should of course occur on an extended economic and democratic basis.

With respect to the trades, there have long been demands for such a guild-like socialistic reorganization. Little serious effort has been made, however. People still wish to sneak in the free guild. As if some compulsion did not constitute the very essence of a guild! A guild without compulsion is like a knife without a blade. You will not curtail the supremacy of capital with that; but that after all is our purpose. Moreover, without compulsion one also cannot secure an order of labor relations (regarding an apprentice and journeyman system, etc.), for order requires compulsion. All attempts made by common undertakings to appropriate the advantages of the capitalist production method will fail in the face of resistance from big-capital's cronies, because they are sufficient unto themselves and prefer to keep all the benefits for themselves. What is a guild good for if a factory, a department store can turn the entire guild upside down? The trades demand the compulsory guild, a type of organization really modeled after the guilds and equipped with comprehensive powers to protect their labor rights; they demand that all economic arrangements for which individual self-help does not suffice be set up jointly by way of guilds. And we also demand such a guild-like organization for the farming class, for largescale industry and large landed estates, for big and small trading firms, and for the class of paid laborers. In order to make this reorganization possible, it is above all essential to create organs from which this reorganization can proceed or with which it can associate. Here, the best and most plausible means would seem to be a corporative interest group. This proposal, too, is not very new; yet we emphasize not so much the interest group s political importance, but rather the socioeconomic significance it could and should have for the future in the course of its further development. There are justified corporative interests, but these also have to find expression in the law. This results in a corporative law code. The law is supposed to be established through the participation of everyone involved. That is a stipulation of natural law, and our democratic times also recognize this participatory requirement. Thus, any corporative legislation also requires corporative representation to create this law. So in the process the individual members of the individual estates would have to elect deputies, commissions in the municipality, province, and country in order to discuss their corporative interests and shape them into legislation, whether in the economics chamber or in the political chamber. We leave it open whether this corporative representation should operate side by side with today s political chambers or whether the existing ones ought to be transformed into corporative ones. 1 The main point is this: 1 The corporative electoral system seems to us to be the only proper mediation between the census and the democratic voting systems. Equality of the occupational groups is the democratic element; only within and for the occupational group is the conservative, truly social element. The current electoral systems result in the rule of class of the bourgeoisie or the proletariat. Societal differences and opposites will always make themselves felt in politics, too. Why not recognize that openly and factor it into the equation? The struggle of interests exists; you can ignore but not eliminate it. Why not fight openly and above board? Why not create legitimate organs for reconciling interests? Struggle is life; but the struggle itself is not yet a calamity. But it has to be fought on a legitimate basis; the central authority has to be strong enough to keep it within bounds. Thus the central power ( monarchy ) can only win, because everyone involved is interested in its preservation. None of the occupational groups desires a conflict

once more we would have representatives of the people, as they live and breathe and work; we would have suitable organs for the creation of corporative legislation that would protect against the outside, vis-à-vis the other estates, and also against the inside, i.e., against malicious, egotistical cronies. These organs would increasingly establish their activity firmly in the public trust, at the top and the bottom of society, and would soon be given both legal jurisdiction and powers of administration. They would also have to be vested with sweeping powers for joint economic reforms. In short, an impulse would have to be created for a movement whose ultimate destination we could not foresee. Large-scale industry in particular requires the structure and legal protection of this organization most urgently. The anarchy of production can only be eliminated by means of an overarching and radical authoritative organization. Ordering production in a way necessitated by societal needs: this constitutes an absolute demand that society and the state should insist on at all costs; but so should the individual producer, who after all risks his neck in the process. There is no better proof of the unpractical, blind, doctrinarian stance of the educated bourgeoisie than the fact that they have learned nothing and done nothing in this respect. The ever-increasing crises, however, will manage to drum the dialectics into their heads. Let s turn to the opposite end of the spectrum the paid laborers. The necessity of corporative organization has prompted the foundation of workers associations. Unfortunately, on the one hand, these are political partisan creations; on the other hand, they lack the solid structure that they require and that can only be secured through legislation. If workers should and wish to achieve an improvement of the situation, if they wish to escape from their proletarian existence, then they have to get organized. Factory workers already enjoy such corporative (protective) legislation, but it still requires significant extension. If that extension is supposed to be radical and practical, the workers themselves have to take care of it, and this necessitates organization. Being organized is even more important if we consider the future goal overcoming the pure wage system and transforming it into a system of fixed salaries. Surely in the long run our humane and democratic age cannot ignore the fact that the relationship between entrepreneur and worker has to assume more steadiness, more mutuality. The paid laborer is more than a commodity that simply needs to be purchased where and when it serves to earn a profit. The working class has a right to work, a right to share in the enjoyment of (national) capital and its fruits, however ideal, abstract, and general that right may be. What follows from this as well, however, is the right of the working class to order the system of production. The most individualistic occupational group appears to be the farmers. Farmers' pride and farmers' obstinacy still have little use for a guild-like, cooperative, and corporative organization. However, the increasingly industrial arrangement of production methods, the growing importance of science, of machines (agricultural chemistry), and of capital are forcing farmers to leading to a coup d état with the exception perhaps of the proletariat. A party is quite prepared for an all-out battle, because it is dominated by personal views and interests; an estate or even less likely, the majority of estates is not, because in them the individual assumes secondary importance, personal ambition and passions are kept in check by the estates. [Original footnote]

organize in a socialistic way if they intend to hold their ground against large-scale operations. Joint establishment of agricultural schools, test stations, industrial facilities (for employing laborers in wintertime, for preserving the waste from manufactured goods, for better exploitation of products on the market), joint use of machines, joint improvements (expanding fields, drainage, etc.), merging of operations, joint purchase and sales, joint building projects (roads, sheds, etc.) all of these things require solid organization, and, farmers being what they are, this can only be achieved by way of a compulsory cooperative. But this is made all the easier, because all of these endeavors do not go beyond the (rural) community. The necessity of corporative legislation for the farming class is already being acknowledged. Freedom from usury, the right to change employment, and the equal division of inheritance are not suitable for farmers. The ordering of inheritance laws and mortgage laws constitute extremely vital questions for our farmers. And yet, a general, hackneyed discussion is not possible here; one has to consider the local, even personal situation. Only another member of the same occupational class can decide on the question of indebtedness, as well as the division of inheritance according to the specific and respective conditions. If some regulation is supposed to take place, is supposed to be instituted in this respect and this has to happen then organs that will ultimately achieve this must first be established: the farming class has to organize. Anyway, a corporative structure is the basic prerequisite for the solution of all social questions. Let s take, for instance, the issue of credit: if centralization, the squandering of credit to fraudulent, unprofitable enterprises, if the choking and absorption of independence is to be ended, if credit arrangements are really supposed to assume a more democratic form, become organized, this can only happen in conjunction with a corporative organization. By way of the corporative organs, borrowed capital will spread to all parts of the social organism, and thus really fulfill a social mission. 2 Let s look at another point: fraud and counterfeiting. Here, too, only peers in the same occupational category can effectively monitor each other. And it is they who have the greatest interest in doing so. You only have to provide them with organs of selfgovernance equipped with sweeping powers, and no doubt they will take care. These organs will oversee the business code of honor, and also re-awaken the appreciation of honor in the broadest sense: moral honor ( professional tribunal ). A corporative type of organization will also revive corporative moral standards and that is a wonderful gain. We estimate the effects of corporative organization to be just as substantial in terms of politics. Not the phrase, not the party, but the real needs of life would come to the fore again. We would once again become conservative in our politics. The serious working person, trained in practical life, would once more get a chance to speak; our professional politicians would be paralyzed. Then we would be able to speak of freedom and self-governance, the tyranny of bureaucracy would be finished. Then we would have an effective counterweight against the 2 Something similar applies to the reorganization of care for the poor, the tax reform, and the insurance system, etc. [Original footnote]

tendencies toward political centralization and against the despotism of party and princely power. Then we would have gained guarantees for the expansion of state and municipal socialism. There is a whole range of production fields that should be assigned to the state, and even more so, to the municipality, both in the interest of production but especially in the interest of distribution so that it benefits everyone. It is merely political reservations and the lack of suitable administrative organs that urge caution. Organized occupational classes would eliminate these difficulties. The factually existing and continuously expanding socialistic method of production requires expression in the shape of laws, that is, a more or less socialistic legal system. The individualism prevailing to this day liberalism constitutes merely a hidden form of despotism; it satisfies neither the needs of the community nor the interests of production. Socialism will come anyway, either the absolute, Social Democratic one of the state, or the relative, conservative, and healthy one of the occupational classes: that is the solution of the social question. Source: Franz Hitze, Die Quintessenz der sozialen Frage [The Quintessence of the Social Question]. Paderborn: Bonifacius-Druckerei, 1880, pp. 24-32. Original German text reprinted in Hans Fenske, ed., Im Bismarckschen Reich: 1871-1890 [In the Bismarckian Reich: 1871-1890]. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1978, pp. 244-48. Translation: Erwin Fink