EEOC and Darmo et al. v. Pinnacle Nissan, Inc. et al.

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Equal Employment Opportunity ) Commission, ) Case No.: CV PHX-DAE

EEOC v. Brink's Incorporated

EEOC and Thornton, et al, v. University of Phoenix, Inc. and Apollo Group, Inc.

United States of America v. The City of Belen, New Mexico

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Monk's Inc., d/b/a International House of Pancakes, Defendant.

EEOC v. PVNF, L.L.C., d/b/a Chuck Daggett Motors and Big Valley Auto

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Convergys Corporation

EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc.,

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) The United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the "Commission" or

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Tri-Spur Investment Company, Inc., dba Sbarro's Italian Eatery

EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores d/b/a Sam s Club

Case 3:05-cv HTW-LRA Document 82 Filed 04/20/2007 Page 1 of 7

EEOC and Maria Torres v. The Restaurant Company dba Perkins

EEOC v. U-Haul International Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT ~~"A"!tOl'T~'CTCOURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEX~eRQUE, New MI!XICO ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

EEOC v. Merrill Pine Ridge, LLC

EEOC v. Stephens Institute d/b/a The Academy of Art College

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Maharaja Hospitality Inc, d/b/a Quality Inn by Choice Hotels

EEOC v. RSG Forest Products Inc. dba Estacada Lumber Co.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. ) Defendant. )

Cornell University ILR School. Judge Karen E. Schreier

EEOC & Mitchel, et al., v. Allied Aviation Services, Inc., Allied Aviation Fueling of Dallas, LP, Allied Aviation Fueling Company of Texas, Inc.

EEOC v. Mason County Forest Products, LLC

EEOC v. Mcdonald's Restaurants of California, Inc.

EEOC & Wolansky v. United Healthcare of Florida, Inc.

EEOC v. Applegate Holdings LLC

EEOC v. Northwest Savings Bank

EEOC v. JEC Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a McDonalds

EEOC, Christopher, Bhend, and Chamara v. National Education Association, National Education Association - Alaska

EEOC v. Supreme Corporation and Supreme Northwest LLC

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Mint Julep Restaurant Operations, LLC d/b/a Cheddar's Casual Cafe, Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bob Watson Chevrolet

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Studley Products, Inc. and Wildwood Industries, Inc., Defendants.

EEOC v. River View Coal, LLC

EEOC v. NEA-Alaska, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Majesty Maintenance, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Seafoods Company

EEOC v. Ealge Wings Industries, Inc.

EEOC & Rodriguez, et al. v. Dynamic Medical Services, Inc.

EEOC v. Fleming, Inc., d/b/a J. Edward's

EEOC v. CMC Service of Chicago, LLC d/b/a Great Clips for Hair

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, et al., v. White House Home for Adults

United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Jetson Midwest Mailers, Inc., Defendant.

EEOC & Aimee Boss and Morgan Hagedon v. Bodega Bars USA, LLC d/b/a Mosaic Restaurant

EEOC v. Bice of Chicago, et al.

EEOC v. Tropiano Transportation Services, Inc.

EEOC v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.

EEOC v. Cleveland Construction, Inc.

U.S. EEOC v Promens USA, Inc. and Bonar Plastics, Inc.

EEOC v. Consolidated Stores, Inc. d/b/a Big Lots

EEOC v. Family Dollar Stores of Arkansas

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rochdale Village, Inc.

EEOC v. Hiten Hospitality L.L.C. d/b/a Family Motor Inn and Jay Kishan Hospitality, Inc. and Mike Patel

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Betsy Ross Flag Girl, Inc. d/b/a Betsy Ross Flag Girl and Barjac Company

EEOC v. Parker Palm Springs Hotel

EEOC v. Oglethorpe University

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Lutheran Social Services of Southern California, Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Peter Servidio, Plaintiffs, v. Labranche & Co., Inc., Defendant.

EEOC v. Lawry's Retaurants, Inc,, d/b/a Lawry's The Prime Rib, Five Crowns, and Tam O'Shanter Inn

EEOC v. Dillard's, Inc

EEOC v. Jolet II, Inc., d/b/a Thompson Care Center

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Revolution Studios and Smile Productions, LLC

EEOC v. Altec Industries

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Japanese Food Solutions Inc., d/b/a Minado Restaurant

EEOC v. Baldwin Supply Co.

EEOC v. Hannon's Food Services of Jackson Inc (d/b/a Kentucky Fried Chicken)

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Sherree Salter, et al., v. The Shoe Show of Rocky Mount, Inc., Andre Jones

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dutch Farms, Inc.

EEOC v. Grimmway Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Grimmway Farms; Esparza Enterprises, Inc.

EEOC and David Marcotte and Robert Kerouac v. Federal Express Corp.

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Plaintiff, Defendant. CONSENT DECREE

EEOC & Suzanne Whitty v. Mount Carmel, LLC, and Benedictine Health System, et al.

EEOC v. Moka Shoe Corporation

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff and Jane Doe, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Brookshire Grocery Company, Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. American Airlines, Inc., and Transport Workers Union Local 501

EEOC and Quianna M. Knowles v. Remedy Intelligent Staffing, Inc.

EEOC, et al v Lafayette College, et al.,

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al. v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc., d/b/a Harbor Freight Tools

Case 1:11-cv NLH -AMD Document 61 Filed 01/24/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 211 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc., Defendant.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff, v. Associated Home Health Care of Palm Beach.

United States of America v. City of Alma, Georgia and Bacon County, Georgia

EEOC v. Original Hot Dog Shops, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop, Food Gallery Original, Inc. doing business as Original Hot Dog Shop

EEOC v. John Wieland Homes and Neighborhoods, Inc.

US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Erika Morales, et al., v. ABM Industries Inc., et al.

EEOC. v. Fox News. Cornell University ILR School. Judge William H. Pauly

EEOC v. Pass and Seymour, Inc. and Kennmark Group, Ltd. (Consent Decree as to Pass and Seymour)

EEOC v. KCD Construction, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

EEOC v. Michoacan Seafood Group. LLC

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Pizza Hut of America, Inc.

EEOC v. Roadway Express, INC. and YRC, INC.; William Bandy, et al. v. Roadway Express, INC. and YRC, INC.,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Case 2:01-cv DLG Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/08/2002 Page 1 of 10

EEOC v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.

EEOC v. Supervalu Holdings, Inc.

IllY _ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ) CIVIL NO. COO-16S1 Z 10 COJ\.

EEOC v. Preferred Labor LLC, d/b/a Preferred People Staffing

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. lj'lhed States FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS E,.'/';~rn DiStrict. HOUSTON DIVISION CONSENT DECREE

Transcription:

Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program -0-00 EEOC and Darmo et al. v. Pinnacle Nissan, Inc. et al. Judge Mary H. Murguia Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/condec Thank you for downloading this resource, provided by the ILR School's Labor and Employment Law Program. Please help support our student research fellowship program with a gift to the Legal Repositories! This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Labor and Employment Law Program at DigitalCommons@ILR. It has been accepted for inclusion in Consent Decrees by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@ILR. For more information, please contact hlmdigital@cornell.edu.

EEOC and Darmo et al. v. Pinnacle Nissan, Inc. et al. Keywords EEOC, Darmo, Pinnacle Nissan, Inc., CIV 00-1 PHX MHM, Consent Decree, Hostile Work Environment, Retaliation, Compensation, Constructive Discharge, National Origin, Religion, Race, Retail, Employment Law, Title VII This article is available at DigitalCommons@ILR: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/condec/1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, Samuel Darmo; Amer Darmo; and Samuel Einhorn, vs. FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Intervenors, Pinnacle Nissan, Inc., et al., Defendants. CIV 00-1 PHX MHM CONSENT DECREE The United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ( the Commission or EEOC filed this action against Pinnacle Nissan, Inc. to enforce Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1, U.S.C. 000e et seq. (Title VII and the Civil Rights Act of 11, U.S.C. 11a. In the Commission s Amended Complaint, the Commission alleges that Pinnacle Nissan has subjected a class of employees to a hostile work environment due to their national origin and subjected Samuel Einhorn to a hostile work environment due to his religion. In

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 addition, the Commission alleges that employees were retaliated against for opposing discriminatory practices. Pinnacle Nissan has timely filed answers to the Amended Complaint and at all times denied the allegations in the Amended Complaint. It is understood that this Consent Decree does not constitute an admission by Pinnacle Nissan of any violation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1, as amended, and that all allegations of liability are expressly denied by Pinnacle Nissan. The parties to this Consent Decree have decided to resolve this matter on the following terms. The parties do not object to the jurisdiction of the Court over this action and waive their rights to a hearing and the entry of findings of fact and conclusions of law and to a jury trial. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 1. This Decree resolves all claims by the Commission and Intervenors, including all claims asserted by the Commission on behalf of class members Bassam Abazly, Claudio Guzelli, Sal De Luna, Mike Madrid, Sam Darmo, Amer Darmo, and Samuel Einhorn and Intervenors Sam Darmo, Amer Darmo, and Samuel Einhorn against Pinnacle Nissan, including claims for discrimination, harassment, constructive discharge, retaliation, back pay, compensatory damages, punitive damages, interest, declaratory relief, injunctive relief, attorney's fees and costs arising out of the issues in this lawsuit and its underlying and related charges. GENERAL INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. Pinnacle Nissan and its officers, agents, employees, successors, assigns and all persons in active concert or participation with it, agree for the duration of the Decree that they will not (a discriminate based on national origin

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 or religion, or (b retaliate against any employee because he or she (i opposed discriminatory practices made unlawful by Title VII, (ii filed a charge or is assisting or participating in the filing of a charge of discrimination, or (iii assisted or participated in an investigation or proceeding brought under Title VII. APPOINTMENT OF OMBUDSPERSON. Consistent with the purposes of the Decree to avoid discrimination and enable Pinnacle Nissan to be a model employer in the area of antidiscrimination and equal employment opportunity, within 0 (sixty days of the entry of the Decree, Pinnacle Nissan s President will appoint an Ombudsperson, with the approval of the Commission, to serve at least during the term of the Decree. This Ombudsperson shall report directly to Pinnacle Nissan s President and his or her services may be terminated only for cause.. The Ombudsperson will be exclusively responsible at Pinnacle Nissan for (a reviewing and, if necessary, revising Pinnacle Nissan s antidiscrimination policies; (b establishing a meaningful diversity awareness program, as set forth below; (c receiving, investigating and maintaining all records of all complaints of discrimination; (d disciplining and terminating employees for violation of Pinnacle Nissan s anti-harassment policies; (e evaluating employees in the area of anti-discrimination/equal employment opportunity, as set forth in Paragraph below; and (f preparing reports to the Commission, as required by this Decree. CORRECTIVE POLICIES AND PRACTICES. Pinnacle Nissan will post, for the duration of this Decree, in a prominent place frequented by its employees at its facilities, the notice attached as Exhibit A. The notice shall be the same type, style and size as Exhibit A.. Pinnacle Nissan will institute and carry out policies and practices that help assure a work environment free from national origin, racial, and religious

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 discrimination for its employees and that allows employees to raise concerns or complaints without retaliation about matters, whether alleged, perceived, or actual, made unlawful by Title VII.. Pinnacle Nissan will provide training on national origin, race, and religious discrimination and retaliation, according to the following terms: A. Pinnacle Nissan will retain and pay for consultant/lecturer(s, acceptable to the Commission, who will provide consultation and training as set forth below for a period of two years from the date of this Decree. At least sixty (0 days prior to the proposed training session, Pinnacle Nissan shall submit the name(s, address(es, telephone number(s and resume(s of the proposed consultant/lecturer(s, together with the dates of the proposed training session and an outline of the contents of the training to the Regional Attorney, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 00 North Central Avenue, Suite 0, Phoenix, Arizona 01. The Commission shall have 0 days from the date of receipt of the information described above to accept or reject the proposed consultant/lecturer and/or the contents of the seminar. In the event the Commission does not approve the designated consultant/lecturer and/or the contents of the training, the Commission and Pinnacle Nissan shall attempt in good faith to resolve the matter. B. During each of the next two years, the consultant/lecturer(s will conduct one live seminar training session each year. The live session shall be for taping purposes and will be for General Managers, supervisors, human resource personnel and top management. All of Pinnacle Nissan s supervisory, human resource, and management employees, who are employed by Pinnacle Nissan, shall attend the live seminar sessions in each year. All of Pinnacle Nissan s non-supervisory employees shall watch the videotaped showing of the live session each year. Pinnacle Nissan shall keep a written record of all

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 employees who are required to watch the videotaped training and who attend the live training. Pinnacle Nissan may at its election have duplicative videotaped sessions to accommodate staffing needs. Pinnacle Nissan shall be responsible for any additional costs to provide such duplicative sessions. C. During the first year, the seminar-training session shall be conducted within four months of the entry of this Decree. For the second year, the seminar-training session shall be conducted between and months after the completion of the preceding session. D. The seminar-training sessions shall be no less than three hours, including 0 minutes of questions and answers. All personnel, designated in paragraph B, shall both register and attend the seminar-training session. The registry of attendance shall be retained by Pinnacle Nissan for the duration of the Decree. E. The seminars will include the subjects of diversity awareness, what constitutes race, national origin, and religious discrimination, as well as retaliation for engaging in protected activity under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1. This training will cover discrimination in the hiring, firing, compensation, assignment or other terms, conditions or privileges of employment; the prevention of discrimination; how to provide a work environment free from discrimination, harassment and retaliation; and to whom and by what means employees may complain if they feel they have been subjected to discrimination, harassment or retaliation in the workplace. The session shall also review and explain the policies set out in Paragraph of this Decree. F. During the live training sessions, Pinnacle Nissan s Ombudsperson shall read a letter from the President, if he is not there, and will speak to the employees about the discipline that can be taken against supervisors, managers and employees who commit acts of discrimination,

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 harassment or retaliation or allow discrimination, harassment or retaliation to occur in the workplace, the importance of maintaining an environment free of discrimination, and its anti-discrimination policies, in accordance with Paragraph of this Decree. G. The Commission, at its discretion and with prior notice to Pinnacle Nissan, may designate Commission representatives to attend in the first seminar-training session. The representatives shall have the right to fully participate in the session.. Within thirty days of the entry of this Decree, Pinnacle Nissan will review and, if necessary, revise its written policies concerning discrimination and retaliation to conform with the law and submit the policy for review to the Regional Attorney of the Phoenix District Office of the EEOC. This written policy must include at a minimum: A. A strong and clear commitment to a workplace free of religious, race and national origin discrimination; B. A clear and strong encouragement of persons who believe they have been discriminated against to come forward; C. A description of the consequences, up to and including termination, that will be imposed upon violators of the policy; D. A promise of maximum feasible confidentiality for persons who believe that they have been discriminated against in violation of the policy; E. An assurance of non-retaliation for persons who believe they have been discriminated against and witnesses; F. That national origin, religious, and racial discrimination by all persons, including management officials, supervisors, vendors, suppliers, third parties and customers is prohibited and will not be tolerated;

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 G. The identification of specific alternative individuals, including the Ombudsperson, with their telephone numbers, to whom employees who have been subjected to discrimination can report the discrimination and who have the authority to investigate allegations of discrimination in a neutral and confidential manner. H. A written statement that the employee may report the harassment to designated persons outside of his or her chain of management should the complainant believe managers in the chain of command have a conflict of interest, are implicated in the allegations, or may not adequately investigate the complaint. I. Assurances that Pinnacle Nissan will investigate allegations of national origin, race and religious discrimination promptly, fairly, reasonably and effectively by appropriate investigators and that appropriate corrective action to make victims whole and to eradicate the discrimination; and J. Information regarding the employee s right to file a charge of discrimination with the EEOC or the Arizona Civil Rights Division.. These policies shall be posted in a prominent location at the dealership. These policies shall be transmitted to Pinnacle Nissan s employees by its President and distributed to each current employee within thirty days of the entry of the Decree. These policies shall be distributed to all new employees when hired. These policies also shall be posted in a prominent place frequented by the employees.. Pinnacle Nissan shall institute a procedure which evaluates the General Manager, managers, supervisors and applicable human resources personnel on their performance in responding to complaints of discrimination and for their compliance with EEO laws, including Title VII. The failure of such an

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 employee to enforce the policies and the anti-discrimination laws must result in appropriate disciplinary action.. Pinnacle Nissan shall promptly, reasonably and appropriately investigate all complaints of national origin, religious, and racial discrimination, as appropriate. The investigation must include a finding of whether discrimination occurred, a credibility assessment, interviews of all potential victims and witnesses identified, and concurrent notes of the investigation, as appropriate. Pinnacle Nissan shall take immediate appropriate corrective action to make discrimination victims whole, to discipline violators and to eradicate the discrimination, as appropriate. 1. Pinnacle Nissan shall not retain documents related to any such investigation referred to in Paragraph in any of the complainant s personnel files. All disciplinary actions taken against employees for violation of any aforementioned policy will be retained in the violator s personnel file. In those cases in which no conclusion could be reached on the allegations, the investigation documents shall be maintained in a separate file. 1. Copies of all complaints of discrimination must be provided to the Ombudsperson. REPORTING BY PINNACLE NISSAN AND ACCESS BY EEOC 1. Pinnacle Nissan shall report in writing to the Regional Attorney of the Commission's Phoenix District Office at 00 N. Central Ave., Suite 0, Phoenix, Arizona 01, beginning six months from the date of the entry of this Decree, and thereafter every six months for the duration of the Decree the following information: A. Any changes, modifications, revocations, or revisions to its policies and procedures which concern or affect the subject of race, national origin, or religious discrimination, or retaliation.

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 B. The registry of persons attending the live seminars required in Paragraph of this Decree, a list of current personnel employed by Pinnacle Nissan on the days of the seminar-training sessions, and a copy of the written record required for the videotaped training sessions required in Paragraph. C. Confirmation that (i the Notice required in Paragraph of this Decree was posted and the locations where it was posted, (ii the policies required in Paragraph were distributed to each current and new employee and posted, and (iii the expungement from each charging party and class member s personnel file as required in Paragraph 1 of this Decree took place, the date of the expungement, and the specific documents expunged. 1. The Commission, upon seven ( days written notice to Pinnacle Nissan s Ombudsperson, shall have the right to enter and inspect Pinnacle Nissan s premises to insure compliance with this Decree and Title VII's prohibition of race, national origin, and religious discrimination, as well as retaliation. MONETARY RELIEF 1. Pinnacle Nissan agrees to pay the Commission and Intervenors the amount of $ 1,1.00 pursuant to Exhibit B and paragraphs 1 and 1. 1. Within fourteen (1 business days of the entry of this Decree, Pinnacle Nissan shall pay the appropriate settlement amounts separately to each EEOC charging party and class member by check, cashier s check, or money order, in accordance with Exhibit B. These payments represent settlement of compensatory damages. Pinnacle Nissan will issue forms for all payments. 1. The checks provided for in Paragraph 1 of this Decree shall be mailed directly by Pinnacle Nissan to each charging party and class member at the addresses supplied by the Commission. Within three business days of issuance of the checks, Pinnacle Nissan shall submit a copy of each check and

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 related correspondence to the Regional Attorney, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 00 North Central Avenue, Suite 0, Phoenix, Arizona, 01. Issuance and mailing of the checks shall constitute compliance with the payment obligation set forth herein. 1. Within fourteen (1 days of the entry of this Decree, Pinnacle Nissan shall pay $ 1,.00 to Steve Montoya for attorney s fees, in full and final settlement for any and all claims for attorney s fees and costs associated with the claims of any class members, including, without limitation, the intervening class members. 0. Pinnacle Nissan will not condition the receipt of the individual relief on a claimant's agreement to: (a maintain as confidential the terms of this Decree; or (b waive his statutory right to file a charge with any federal or state anti-discrimination agency. MISCELLANEOUS NON-MONETARY INDIVIDUAL RELIEF 1. Pinnacle Nissan will expunge from the personnel files of each charging party and class member all references to the charges of discrimination filed against Pinnacle Nissan or their participation in this action, and any derogatory documents which related to complaints or investigation of discrimination.. In response to all future employment inquiries regarding charging parties or class members, Pinnacle Nissan will provide a written reference which states the dates of employment and does not state that the person was terminated for cause. COSTS AND DURATION. Each party will bear its costs and attorney's fees, except as provided herein, incurred as a result of this action through the filing of this Decree.

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1. The duration of this Decree will be two years from its entry. This Court will retain jurisdiction over this action for the duration of the Decree, during which the Commission may petition this Court for compliance with this Decree. Should the Court determine that Pinnacle Nissan has not complied with this Decree, appropriate relief, including extension of this Decree for such period as may be necessary to remedy its non-compliance, may be ordered. This Decree will expire by its own terms at the end of twenty four months from the date of entry, without further action by the parties.. The parties agree to entry of this Decree and judgment subject to final approval by the Court. ENTERED AND ORDERED this day of, 00. Mary H. Murguia United States District Court Judge

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 APPROVED AND CONSENTED TO: Pinnacle Nissan,Inc., by: Allan Cady Secretary, Pinnacle Nissan, Inc. Laura M. Franze M. Brett Burns Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P. 100 Pacific Avenue, Suite 0 Dallas, Texas 01 Attorneys for Pinnacle Nissan EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION MARY JO O NEILL Regional Attorney C. EMANUEL SMITH Supervisory Trial Attorney P. DAVID LOPEZ Trial Attorney SALLY C. SHANLEY Trial Attorney Phoenix District Office 00 North Central Avenue, Suite 0 Phoenix, Arizona 01 Attorneys for Plaintiff LAW OFFICES OF STEPHEN G. MONTOYA North Central Ave., Suite 0 Phoenix, Arizona 00 Stephen G. Montoya Attorney for Intervening Plaintiffs 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 EXHIBIT A NOTICE TO ALL EMPLOYEES OF PINNACLE NISSAN This Notice is posted pursuant to a Consent Decree entered into between Pinnacle Nissan and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC. It is unlawful under federal law Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and state law to discriminate against an employee on the basis of national origin and religion. It is also unlawful to retaliate against any person because the person protested discriminatory practices or contacted the EEOC. Pinnacle Nissan will not discriminate against any employee on the basis of national origin or religion, and will not retaliate against any employee. If you believe you have been discriminated against by Pinnacle Nissan, you have the right to seek assistance from: (1 EEOC, 00 North Central Avenue, Suite 0, Phoenix, Arizona 01, (0 0-000; or ( Arizona Civil Rights Division (ACRD of the Attorney General's Office, 1 W. Washington, Phoenix, Arizona, 00, (0 -. or have the right to file a charge with the EEOC or ACRD if you believe you are being discriminated against. No Retaliation Clause. No action may be taken against you by any supervisory or management official of Pinnacle Nissan for (1 opposing discriminatory practices made unlawful by federal law, ( filing a charge or assisting or participating in the filing of a charge of discrimination, or ( assisting or participating in an investigation or proceeding brought under Title VII. Should any such retaliatory actions be taken against you, you should immediately contact the EEOC or the ACRD and the address or telephone numbers listed above. Dated: THIS NOTICE MUST REMAIN POSTED UNTIL. President of Pinnacle Nissan

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Sam Einhorn $ 1,000.00 Sam Darmo $ 1,000.00 Amer Darmo $,000.00 Mike Madrid $,0.00 Bassam Abazly $,.00 Claudio Guzelli $,.00 Sal De Luna $,.00 EXHIBIT B