Topic 1: Moral Reasoning and ethical theory

Similar documents
Chapter 02 Business Ethics

3. Because there are no universal, clear-cut standards to apply to ethical analysis, it is impossible to make meaningful ethical judgments.

CLASSICAL SCHOOL OF CRIMINOLOGY NONSO ROBERT ATTOH FACULTY OF LAW UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA DEC. 2016

Chapter 02 Business Ethics and the Social Responsibility of Business

Ethical Basis of Welfare Economics. Ethics typically deals with questions of how should we act?

ASTRAZENECA GLOBAL STANDARD EXPECTATIONS OF THIRD PARTIES

RESPONSE TO JAMES GORDLEY'S "GOOD FAITH IN CONTRACT LAW: The Problem of Profit Maximization"

Chapter Two: Normative Theories of Ethics

Business Law 16th Edition TEST BANK Mallor Barnes Langvardt Prenkert McCrory

Utilitarianism Revision Help Pack

Ethics Handout 18 Rawls, Classical Utilitarianism and Nagel, Equality

Premise. The social mission and objectives

Rights and Responsibilities. Rights of Engineers 6.4 Fledderrmann

Phil 115, May 24, 2007 The threat of utilitarianism

MGT610 2 nd Quiz solved by Masoodkhan before midterm spring 2012

BB315014S Sustainable Management Futures 27 MARCH 2012

CASE 12: INCOME INEQUALITY, POVERTY, AND JUSTICE

A THEORY OF JUSTICE. Revised Edition JOHN RAWLS

Running Head: The Consequentialism Debate 1. The Consequentialism Debate. Student s Name. Course Name. Course Title. Instructors name.

CHAPTER/LECTURE 1: Introducing the Law Law and Life Law and Personal Life

The Legal Environment of Business and Online Commerce, 8e (Cheeseman) Chapter 2 Ethics and Social Responsibility of Business

Political Obligation 3

MGT610 Quiz Conference and solved by Masood khan before midterm spring 2012

ANTI-FRAUD AND CORRUPTION POLICY. For the ACT Alliance

Business and Human Rights

Ethical Theories CSC 301 Spring 2018 Howard Rosenthal

enforce people s contribution to the general good, as everyone naturally wants to do productive work, if they can find something they enjoy.

Unit 1 Research Project. Eddie S. Jackson. Kaplan University. IT590 Legal and Ethical Issues in IT. Professor Linnea Hall, JD, MSBA

Normative Frameworks 1 / 35

Phil 115, June 13, 2007 The argument from the original position: set-up and intuitive presentation and the two principles over average utility

24.03: Good Food 3/13/17. Justice and Food Production

Sarbanes-Oxley Voluntary Compliance Policies

C H A P T E R THEORETICAL BACKGROUND. certain theories, which have been developed by persons of legal authorities

Maggie Fitzgerald Principal Pharmacist, Medicines Information Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust September 2013

John Stuart Mill ( ) Branch: Political philosophy ; Approach: Utilitarianism Over his own body and mind, the individual is sovereign

Chapter 4. Justice and the Law. Justice vs. Law. David Hume. Justice does not dictate a perfect world, but one in which people live up

Unit One Introduction to law

Session 20 Gerald Dworkin s Paternalism

CODE OF ETHICS (CONDUCT) FOR ADVOCATES

2. Anti-Bribery and Corruption Policy

MLL110 LEGAL PRINCIPLES & SKILLS EXAM NOTES. problems

ALEXIS DE TOCQUEVILLE

Lecture 17 Consequentialism. John Stuart Mill Utilitarianism Mozi Impartial Caring

ECON 4270 Distributive Justice Lecture 4: Rawls and liberal equality

Dr. Mohammad O. Hamdan

Full file at

Running head: MOST SCRIPTURALLY CORRECT THEORY OF GOVERNMENT 1. Name of Student. Institutional Affiliation

II. Bentham, Mill, and Utilitarianism

Social Contract Theory

POSTGRADUTAE PROGRAM: BUSINESS ETHICS AND SOCIAL ACCOUNTING, SOME GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS TO INTEGRATE THE PAPERS AND THE SLIDES OF THE COURSE

WHISTLE BLOWING AND EMPLOYEE LOYALTY DUSKA

Text consolidated by Tulkošanas un terminoloģijas centrs (Translation and Terminology Centre) with amending laws of:

A Biblical View of Economics A Christian Life Perspective

FirstRand anti-bribery policy

Glossary of Terms for Business Law and Ethics

MCOM 301: Media Laws & Ethics

and government interventions, and explain how they represent contrasting political choices

TSB CONSTRUCTIONS LTD

The Forgotten Principles of American Government by Daniel Bonevac

Advocacy Cycle Stage 4

Beccaria s Dream On Criminal Law and Nodal Governance. Klaas Rozemond Associate professor of Criminal Law VU University Amsterdam

Cambridge University Press The Cambridge Rawls Lexicon Edited by Jon Mandle and David A. Reidy Excerpt More information

The Criminal Law. General Part. Chapter I General Provisions

Ross s view says that the basic moral principles are about prima facie duties. Ima Rossian

Developments in Enforcement of Environmental Laws: recent amendments in Queensland

I. STATEMENT OF COMMITMENT AGAINST CORRUPTION, BRIBERY & EXTORTION

Assignment to make up for missed class on August 29, 2011 due to Irene

CONSTITUTION OF THE FOURTH REPUBLIC OF TOGO Adopted on 27 September 1992, promulgated on 14 October 1992

Anti-Bribery Policy WHC reserves the right to amend this policy at its discretion. The most up-to-date version can be downloaded from our website.

Applying International Election Standards. A Field Guide for Election Monitoring Groups

BUSINESS INTEGRITY POLICY

CHAPTER 19 MARKET SYSTEMS AND NORMATIVE CLAIMS Microeconomics in Context (Goodwin, et al.), 2 nd Edition

Consider Ethics: Theory, Readings, and Contemporary Issues Third Edition Bruce N. Waller. Copyright 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.

Elliston and Martin: Whistleblowing

CHAPTER 4, On Liberty. Does Mill Qualify the Liberty Principle to Death? Dick Arneson For PHILOSOPHY 166 FALL, 2006

MAXIMIZING THE MINIMAL STATE: TOWARD JUSTICE THROUGH RAWLSIAN-NOZICKIAN COMPATIBILITY. Timothy Betts. Submitted in partial fulfillment of the

Rawls versus the Anarchist: Justice and Legitimacy

Apple Inc. vs FBI A Jurisprudential Approach to the case of San Bernardino

Anti-Bribery and Corruption Policy JUNE 2017

NORTHERN IRELAND PRACTICE AND EDUCATION COUNCIL FOR NURSING AND MIDWIFERY

Do we have a strong case for open borders?

CHAPTER EIGHT - SENTENCING OF ORGANIZATIONS

The forensic use of bioinformation: ethical issues

John Stuart Mill. Table&of&Contents& Politics 109 Exam Study Notes

Engineering Ethics. Interaction Rules Settling Conflicts Moral Theories The Ethical Engineer Resource Allocation

Distributive Justice Rawls

Chapter 02 Business Ethics. True/False Questions

In 1978, Congress established the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which reviews warrants related to national security investigations.

On the Irrelevance of Formal General Equilibrium Analysis

Social and Political Philosophy

preserving individual freedom is government s primary responsibility, even if it prevents government from achieving some other noble goal?

Is A Paternalistic Government Beneficial for Society and its Individuals? By Alexa Li Ho Shan Third Year, Runner Up Prize

VI. Rawls and Equality

SUMMARY OF THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Declaration on Media Freedom in the Arab World

LGST 226: Markets, Morality, and Capitalism Robert Hughes Fall 2016 Syllabus

For Next Time. Read: Bluffing. Business?" (Also, please bring your readers to class) ! Albert Z. Carr, "Is Business Bluffing Ethical?

References: Shiller, R.J., (2000), Irrational Exuberance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

California Bar Examination

Minimum Age of Criminal Responsibility (MACR) Comparative Analysis International Profile - Germany

Transcription:

PROFESSIONAL ETHICS Topic 1: Moral Reasoning and ethical theory 1. Ethical problems in management are complex because of: a) Extended consequences b) Multiple Alternatives c) Mixed outcomes d) Uncertain occurrences and e) Personal implications 2. Ethics: a) Principles of morally acceptable conduct of individuals. b) An individual s personal beliefs about right and wrong behaviors. c) Ethics are Individually defined: people have ethics, whereas organizations do not 3. Professional Ethics: a) Moral values that a group of similarly trained people develop to control their performance of a task or their use of resources. 4. An individual s ethics is shaped by a combination of factors: a) Family b) Peers, c) Life experiences, d) Personal values and morals e) Situational factors. 5. Four Common Views of Ethics: a) Utilitarian: i. A morally correct action is one that results in the greatest good for the greatest number of people. ii. To apply this view, we need to identify: 1. Who are directly and indirectly affected; 2. What benefits and harms they would experience; and 3. How long these effects would last. b) Golden Rule: Do unto others as you would have them do unto you c) Kantian Rights: i. The right of free consent (Iuthiraaz) ii. Right of privacy iii. Right of freedom of conscience iv. The right of Freedom v. Right of due process d) Enlightened Self Interest: i. An action is morally right if it gives the individual or stakeholder maximum benefits without arbitrarily hurting others and, when possible, minimize any harm to others. 6. Normative Philosophy: a) The study of proper thought and conducts; that is, how we should behave. b) Moral reasoning requires an understanding of normative philosophy. 7. Ethical Relativism: (opposite of Moral Absolutism) Moral theories arguing that there are no universal moral standards for everyone in all cultures.

8. Ethical Theory: a) Eternal Law (Thomistic Natural Law): Associated with Thomas Aquinas & Thomas Jefferson i. The Eternal Law refers to moral standards that are revealed in Scripture or nature to religious leaders or human philosophers. The belief is that the Law is unchanging and valid for all times. 1. No two Natural Law theorists and very few religious writers have been able to agree on the exact provisions of the revealed or reasoned truth. 2. Cannot be applied universally. b) Utilitarianism (Classical Teleological Ethical Theory): Associated with Jeremy Bentham i. The outcome of a decision or action is of prime importance, and that it is the results that truly matter in our treatment of other people. The principle to be followed is that of beneficiency: a decision or act is right, proper and good only if it generates the greatest amount of benefit for the largest number of people at the lowest cost or harm to others. 1. Possibility of exploitation: justifying benefits for the great majority of the population by imposing sacrifices or penalties on a small minority. 2. At some point, greatest good and greatest number come into conflict, and then we have no single means of determining what is the right or best or proper act. 3. Some actions that are simply wrong, despite great apparent net benefits for a huge majority. (Eg. Killing everyone in prisons annually.) 4. Impossible to balance the benefits of the majority against the sacrifices of a minority. c) Universalism (Classical Deontological Ethical Theory): i. It is the intent behind a decision or action that is important, for we can never accurately foresee and evaluate all possible results. The principle to be followed is that of consistency: a decision or act is right, proper and good only if we can convince everyone facing the same set of circumstances to make the same decision or perform the same act. 1. There are no priorities or no degrees. 2. Difficult to treat others as ends and not as means all the time d) Distributive Justice Theory: Associated with John Rawls i. Based upon the dominance of a single value (i.e. justice) rather than a single principle. Belief in the dominance of justice will lead us to make decisions and take actions that are expected to result in compensating benefits for all, especially the least advantaged members of our society. 1. It is entirely dependent upon the acceptance of the proposition that social cooperation provides the basis for all economic and social benefits. 2. Individual effort is downplayed, if not ignored. e) Personal Liberty Theory: Associated with Robert Nozick i. Based upon the dominance of a single value (i.e. liberty) rather than a single principle. Belief in the dominance of liberty will lead us to make decisions and take actions that will result in greater happiness and increased benefits for all. 1. It is based on a very narrow definition of liberty which is limited to the negative right not to suffer interference from others.

Topic 2: Moral Social Responsibility 1. Conditions for Moral accountability and liability: a. Knowledge and freedom: He must be fully aware of what he is doing. He must act freely without any physical or psychological coercion. When knowledge or freedom is diminished, accountability and liability are proportionately diminished. i. Ignorance: Ignorance excuses someone only when it is non culpable (not liable, not guilty, not responsible and unaccountable), the person acting does not understand the nature of what is being done or cannot anticipate all the reasonably foreseeable consequences of the action. ii. Coercion: When a person is forced to do an action, accountability and liability for that action is diminished in proportion. If not forced he will be responsible. (Eg. Dumping toxic waste where it will pollute community water supply, they are responsible as they are not forced) 2. The Natural Law Solution: The natural law moralist holds that to the extent an act is involuntary; the person performing it is proportionately less responsible for it. The natural law moralist allows for coercion only in cases where grave fear destroys a person s freedom to consent to an action. The distinction between material and formal cooperation in someone else s wrongdoing is recognised. a. Formal cooperation: A person commits a morally wrong action, intends the moral wrong, and joins his/her action with the morally evil act of another. b. Material cooperation: The action a person performs is morally good in itself but someone else uses the action for his/her immoral purposes. 3. The Utilitarian Solution: A right moral decision is likely a good business decision. The utilitarian moralist would hold the people involved accountable for calculating the net good and bad results of their proposed actions and for performing only that action that will produce the most good. Coercion by itself does not carry any special weight in the calculation. 4. The Cultural Relativist s Solution: He locates liability and accountability solely in a society s mores (customs, way of life). Coercion is excusable only if the society s customary practices acknowledge it as such. 5. Historical Views of Social Responsibility: 3 TURNING POINTS a. Entrepreneurial Era: During late 1800 s in US, big business started to emerge and their executives wielded control and influence in a national level, and they started to abuse their power for more profit, so the federal government had to make laws to control these people and make them acknowledge the relations between businesses, government and the society. b. Depression Era: Early 1900 s. Large organizations dominated the US economy and practiced improper financial practices which led to the stock market crash of 1929. The government led by Franklin Roosevelt passed several laws to protect investors and small businesses. As an outgrowth of these and other actions, the social responsibility of organisations was more clearly defined c. Social Era: During 1960s, this period of American history was characterised by social unrest. The civil rights movement and widespread opposition to the war in Vietnam energized the American public to examine the nation s values, priorities and goals. Students and activists accused big businesses of trying to promote and extend the Vietnam War in order to increase profits i. Four Basic Consumer Rights by John F. Kennedy: 1. The right to safe products, 2. The right to be informed about all relevant aspects of a product, 3. The right to be heard in the event of a complaint, and 4. The right of consumers to choose what they buy.

6. Social responsibility: Set of obligations that an organisation has to protect. Organisations may be considered responsible to their constituents, the natural environment and the general social welfare. 7. Arguments for and against Social Responsibility: For Help problematic business Corporations are also citizens Business resources often help to solve problems Social responsibility can enhance profits Against Profit is one of the objectives of business Involvement in social programmes gives business too much power A possibility of conflict of interest Inadequate business expertise to manage social programmes 1. The approach that an organisation adopts toward social responsibility falls along a continuum ranging from social obstruction, social obligation and social response, to social contribution. 2. Government influences Organisations in two ways: a. Direct Regulation: Introducing and enforcing laws and regulations for organisations to obey. To implement these regulations the government creates special agencies to monitor and control certain aspects of activity. b. Indirect Regulation: Government indirectly influences organisations in matters related to how organisations should spend their money. The influence comes through taxation, either in the form of incentives or subsidies. 3. Organizations influence Government by: a. Personal contact: Personal contacts and networks offer one method of influence. b. Lobbying: It is an attempt to influence legislation by individuals or groups. c. Political Action Committee: Organisations created to solicit and then distribute the money to political candidates for their campaign. d. Favours: Depend on favours to gain support. 4. Some Ethical Problems in Management: a. Pricing Level: Fluctuation in price level is purely an economic problem, but has some impact on society. b. Advertising Messages: Varying degrees of truthfulness and deception in advertising should be analysed in order to remove any doubt in the minds of the public. c. Product Promotions: These are part of advertising agenda. The public should not be negatively influenced by the promotional message of any advertisement. d. Working Conditions: Working environment should be conducive to employees in their workplace. e. Customer Service: Customers should be given priority in any business transaction. 5. Formal Methods Organisations use to Manage Social Responsibility: a. Legal compliance: Organisations should comply with federal, state, local or even international laws. b. Ethical compliance: Members of the organisation should follow basic ethical standards of behaviour accepted by the society. c. Philanthropic giving: Awarding or donating funds to charitable programmes as part of the organisation s contribution to the public. 6. Leadership and allowing for Whistle blowing are informal means of managing social responsibility.

Topic 3: Nature of Ethics in Modern Business 1. Ethical problems are managerial problems because they represent a conflict between an organisation s economic performance and its social performance. 2. Characteristics of Ethical Problems in Management: a. Extended Consequences: The results of managerial decisions/actions extend throughout the society. For example, unsafe products affect individual lives. b. Multiple Alternatives: Multiple alternatives have to be developed in making ethical decisions or choices. c. Mixed Outcomes: Social benefits and costs as well as financial revenues and expenses are associated with almost all the alternatives in ethical choices. d. Uncertain Consequences: It is not always clear what consequences will follow from most ethical decisions or choices. e. Personal Implications: Individual benefits and costs as well as financial and social benefits and costs are associated with most of the alternatives in ethical decisions. 3. Analysis of Ethical Problems in Management: a. Economic Analysis: Microeconomics / macroeconomics theories which rely on an openmarket operation and supply and demand forces should be able, to a certain extent, to help solve some ethical problems. b. Legal Analysis: Should ethical problems become major problems, a law can be passed to deal with the situation. c. Ethical Analysis: Under the normative philosophy, if everybody is rational in a society and acts on the same principles, members of that society would be treated as fairly as possible. 4. The holistic approach of Islam is evident in its three core tenets: a. The unity in God, b. The unity of humankind c. The unity of religion. 5. The syariah (shareea ), or the law of Islam, is based on the Qur an. Probably the most encompassing and most universal ethical prescription of the syariah is contained in a verse of the Qur an which requires a Muslim, at all times and in all circumstances, to act in what can be translated from Arabic as a decent and benevolent way, and to refrain from wrongdoing.