PROTECTING RIGHTS IN PRACTICE: THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT AND THE COMMON LAW. Nathalie Lieven QC Landmark Chambers

Similar documents
Justice Committee Post-legislative scrutiny of the Police and Fire Reform (Scotland) Act 2012

CASE NOTE: THE NICKLINSON, LAMB AND AM RIGHT-TO-DIE CASE IN THE SUPREME COURT

Before: THE SENIOR PRESIDENT OF TRIBUNALS LORD JUSTICE UNDERHILL Between:

Chapter 16: Right to Review the Legality of Any Deprivation of Liberty

Jurisdiction: domicile of choice.

4. Those who currently enjoy the right of abode in the UK are:

PART 2: THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS. The Human Rights Act 1998 and the Criminal Justice System

Liberty s response to the UK Border Authority s consultation on Reforming Asylum Support

Office of the Children s Commissioner (OCC):

Asylum and Immigration Act 2004: An update

Clause 37 and Schedule 8 of the Immigration Bill on Support for Certain Categories of Migrant

Breach of Human Rights and S4

Human Rights Inquiry

JUDGMENT. Eclipse Film Partners No 35 LLP (Appellant) v Commissioners for Her Majesty s Revenue and Customs (Respondent)

This submission 4. This submission addresses each of the questions raised in the Committee s consultation paper in turn.

JUDGMENT. R (on the application of AA) (FC) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent)

United Nations Convention against Torture: New Zealand s sixth periodic review, 2015 shadow report

Current/Recent House of Lords Cases

SANCTIONS AND ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING BILL AMENDMENT TO BE MOVED IN COMMITTEE

LEGAL SCHEME REGULATIONS. These Regulations came into force on 1 October 2017

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM UKSC 2012/

5. SUPREME COURT HAS BOTH ORIGINAL AND APPELLATE JURISDICTION

Refugee Law In Hong Kong

SUBMISSION FROM THE LORD ADVOCATE UK SUPREME COURT JURISDICTION. Background

APPENDIX. 1. The Equipment Interference Regime which is relevant to the activities of GCHQ principally derives from the following statutes:

Support to the Anti-Corruption Strategy of Georgia (GEPAC) CoE Project No. 2007/DGI/VC/779

Foster: Q&A Human Rights and Civil Liberties

Review of sections 34 to 37 of the Scotland Act Compatibility issues. Report

The bail tribunal does not have the jurisdiction to assess the lawfulness of detention.

Judicial Review: proposals for reform

Submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review

Clements: Q&A Public Law. Chapter 7: The Human Rights Act 1998

EU (Withdrawal) Bill- Committee stage

Durham Research Online

Proportionality what has it done for us so far; what might it do to us next? Jonathan Swift QC

British Irish RIGHTS WATCH SUBMISSION TO THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL S UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW MECHANISM CONCERNING THE UNITED KINGDOM

CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 40 OF THE COVENANT. Concluding observations of the Human Rights Committee.

Prisons and Courts Bill

Asylum Support Partnership response to Oversight of the Immigration Advice Sector consultation

THE AIRE CENTRE Advice on Individual Rights in Europe

PRESS SUMMARY. On appeal from R (Conway) v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] EWHC 2447 (Admin)

Doctoral Candidate; Teaching and Research Assistant, Department of Public Law, University of Cape Town, South Africa

Asylum Law. The Saeima 1 has adopted and the President has proclaimed the following Law: Chapter I General Provisions

Alison Harvey, Legal Director ILPA for AVID 12 June 2015

Immigration Bail and Studying Coram Children's Legal Centre s briefing, March 2018

Section 94B: The impact upon Article 8 and the appeal rights. The landscape post-kiarie. Admas Habteslasie Landmark Chambers

Wordie Property Co. v Secretary of State for Scotland 1983 SLT (LP Emslie) Somerville v Scottish Ministers 2008 SC (HL) 45

COUNTER TERRORISM AND SECURITY BILL DELEGATED POWERS MEMORANDUM BY THE HOME OFFICE

Government response to the Joint Committee on Human Rights: The implications for access to justice of the Government's proposals to reform legal aid.

NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION. LEGALEase. Your Rights to an Appeal in a Criminal Case in the New York State Courts

Victoria House 9 March 2018 Bloomsbury Place London WC1A 2EB. Before: ANDREW LENON Q.C. (Chairman) Sitting as a Tribunal in England and Wales

Justice Committee. Victims and Witnesses (Scotland) Bill. Written submission from Action Scotland Against Stalking

How best to protect your rights in US and EU Antitrust Investigations and Dawn Raids. Philip D. Bartz Robert S. K. Bell

Deportation and Article 8 ECHR. Matthew Fraser 3 October 2018

Practical Tips for Possession: The View from the Housing Possession Duty Desk and Exceptional Funding under LASPO

Seeking Refuge? A handbook for asylum-seeking women UPDATE 2014 FOLLOWING CHANGES TO THE IMMIGRATION RULES ON FAMILY MIGRATION

Snp Immigration Policy A Back Door To England?

Widely Recognised Human Rights and Freedoms

Law on the Protector of Human Rights and Freedoms of Montenegro

Ch. 20. Due Process of Law. The Meaning of Due Process 1/23/2015. Due Process & Rights of the Accused

Prison Reform Trust response to the Commission on a Bill of Rights discussion paper, Do we need a UK Bill of Rights?

UNITED KINGDOM: FIVE YEARS ON: TIME TO END THE CONTROL ORDERS REGIME

Official Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES

Harper Government Unilateral federal legislation imposing over First Nations:

The Supreme Court of Norway

JUDGMENT. R (on the application of Gibson) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Justice (Respondent)

THE ROMA CASE IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS

Opinion adopted by the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention at its sixty-ninth session (22 April-1 May 2014)

Freedom of Information and Closed Proceedings: The Unavoidable Irony

Douwe Korff Professor of International Law London Metropolitan University, London (UK)

How can NGOs and lawyers collaborate to increase the use of international human rights law in the courts? PILS/PILA Conference, 7 June 2012

UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL. Working Group on Arbitrary Detention

Local Authority obligations to people with No Recourse to Public Funds (NRPF) Olvia Fellas Team Manager

JUDGMENT JUDGMENT GIVEN ON. 5 November Lord Neuberger, President Lord Mance Lord Reed Lord Hughes Lord Toulson. before

R (Mayaya) v SSHD, C4/2011/3273, on appeal from [2011] EWHC 3088 (Admin), [2012] 1 All ER 1491

Reigning Supreme: Events at the UK Supreme Court in 2015

Schedule 10, Immigration Act 2016

Official Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES

Council of the European Union Brussels, 26 February 2015 (OR. en)

THE EU CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS; AN INDISPENSABLE INSTRUMENT IN THE FIELD OF ASYLUM

The Nature and Sources of UK Constitutional Law. Aims of this Chapter. Sample

Deportation Appeals for non-eea Nationals. A Basic Overview

Investigatory Powers Bill

A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC] /05 Judgment [GC]

JUDGMENT. MS (Palestinian Territories) (FC) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent)

Lower House of the States General

Papua New Guinea Consolidated Legislation

Please check as applies: Manhattan: And/Or White Plains: Habeas Panel Only:

RIGHTS GUARANTEED IN ORIGINAL TEXT CIVIL LIBERTIES VERSUS CIVIL RIGHTS

Human Rights from the Perspective of Devolution in Wales. Thomas Glyn Watkin

The Impact of Brexit on Equality Law

Asylum Support for dependants

IN THE UPPER TRIBUNAL

List of issues prior to submission of the fourth periodic report of Bulgaria**

Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006

Before:

IMMIGRATION & ASYLUM ACCREDITATION SCHEME

Employment and immigration enforcement: The legal limits of what can be required from employers

Keynote address given at the Fundamental Rights Conference: A Public Law Perspective, LSE

The Refugee Council s submission to the Education and Skills Committee inquiry into Every Child Matters

Transcription:

PROTECTING RIGHTS IN PRACTICE: THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT AND THE COMMON LAW Nathalie Lieven QC Landmark Chambers

Does the common law give the same rights and protections as the HRA so we don t need to worry too much if the HRA is repealed? My answer major difficulties with relying on the common law alone if the HRA goes Don t know what would replace HRA

Current conventional wisdom ECHR was largely a product of the common law Convention rights can be protected by the common law First port of call should be common law, including case law from other common law jurisdictions

Lord Reed in Osborn v Parole Board 2013 UKSC 64 The submissions on behalf of the appellants focused on article 5.4, and paid comparatively little attention to domestic administrative law. As I shall explain, that approach does not properly reflect the relationship between domestic law (considered apart from the Human Rights Act 1998 ) and Convention rights. The guarantees set out in the substantive articles of the Convention, like other guarantees of human rights in international law, are mostly expressed at a very high level of generality. They have to be fulfilled at national level through a substantial body of much more specific domestic law. That is true in the United Kingdom as in other contracting states. For example, the guarantee of a fair trial, under article 6, is fulfilled primarily through detailed rules and principles to be found in several areas of domestic law, including the law of evidence and procedure, administrative law, and the law relating to legal aid. The guarantee of a right to respect for private and family life, under article 8, is fulfilled primarily through rules and principles found in such areas of domestic law as the law of tort, family law and constitutional law. Many other examples could be given. Article 5, in particular, is implemented through several areas of the law,

Mirrored by Lords Mance and Toulson in Kennedy v Charity Commission UKSC 2014 20 But the Convention rights represent a threshold protection; and, especially in view of the contribution which common lawyers made to the Convention's inception, they may be expected, at least generally even if not always, to reflect and to find their homologue in the common or domestic statute law.

But What does a common law constitutional or fundamental right consist of? De Smith (7 th ed) Access to a judicial remedy Right to life Liberty of the person Doing of justice in public Right to a fair hearing Prohibition of retrospective criminal penalty Freedom of expression Access to legal advice and legal confidentiality Limitation on search powers Prohibition of use of evidence obtained by torture Right to live or return to UK for British citizen Non deprivation of property without compensation Privilege against self incrimination Subsistence for asylum seekers Freedom of movement in UK

Problems (1) Some rights strongly protected in common law Procedural/access to justice rights Osborn concerned right to oral hearing Kennedy right to disclosure, albeit in context of art 10 Liberty habeas corpus Rejection of torture evidence Others potentially much less easy to characterise as common law rights Right to privacy and family life Scope of right to life Cruel and inhuman treatment education

Problems (2) Many substantive rights either less powerful Article 8 rights family life, privacy Article 3 cruel and inhuman treatment Article 14 non discrimination Fine on the statutory categories What about other status? Less clearly defined Article 2 investigatory duty right to die Nicklinson very difficult to articulate in domestic law Very difficult to extract positive obligations out of common law rights

Problems (3) ECHR rights are embedded in statute and therefore approved by parliament Common law rights are judge made Judges more likely to say contrary to the will of Parliament Parliament would find much easier to overturn

The Result The common law is a fine starting point But doesn t protect rights to anything like same extent as HRA Really important to preserve the HRA, or a closely similar statute