So You are An Expert Witness? Want to Be A Defendant, Too? David A Domina Domina Law Group pc llo Omaha NE dominalaw.com

Similar documents
ETHICS IN DEPENDENCY PRACTICE FOR GUARDIAN AD LITEM ATTORNEYS AND ATTORNEYS AD LITEM. Striving for Excellence

CODE OF ETHICS OF THE CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINALISTS

Index of Subjects. Created by: Neil Savage, JD Legal Publications Editor/Indexer th Ave NE Seattle, WA

We are pleased to greet you as a prospective client of this firm. We thank you sincerely for selecting this law firm for your legal needs.

RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

EXHIBIT A-1 GUIDELINES OF PROFESSIONAL COURTESY AND CIVILITY FOR HAWAI I LAWYERS

Code of Professional Responsibility for Interpreters

CODE OF ETHICS FOR TEACHERS AND ENGINEERS FOR TEACHERS

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

New South Wales Professional Conduct and Practice Rules 2013 (Solicitors Rules) FORMER RULES

Legal Profession Uniform Conduct (Barristers) Rules under the. Legal Profession Uniform Law

REPRESENTATION AGREEMENT

INDIANA UNIVERSITY Policy and Procedures on Research Misconduct DRAFT Updated March 9, 2017

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION

Ethics for the Criminal Defense Lawyer

Masters of the Courtroom SM. Ethics

Law Firm Cyber Protection and the Ethics of Protecting Your Digital Assets: Everything You Need and Want to Know

BAR ASSOCIATION OF QUEENSLAND BARRISTERS CONDUCT RULES. 23 February 2018

Legal Truth where the duties to the Court and the Client Collide Professor Alan Paterson OBE

NRMLA Code of Ethics & Professional Responsibility Ethics and Standards Complaint Procedures (As Revised June 16, 2009)

CODE OF ETHICS. fidelity to public needs; fairness and loyalty to his associates, employers, clients, subordinates and employees; and

Ethical Guidelines for Doctors Acting as Medical Witnesses

EXPERT WITNESS: A COMPUTER SCIENCE EMPHASIS

REGARDING: This letter concerns your dismissal of grievance # (Jeffrey Downer) and

Second, you must not be influenced by sympathy, passion or prejudice in favor of any party or against any of the parties.

APPENDIX I. Research Integrity Policy for Responding to Allegations of Scientific Misconduct

Tri-State Regional Special Education Law Conference November 2, 2017 Omaha, Nebraska

SECTION 2 BEFORE FILING SUIT

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARDS FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS

Review of reporting on prospective financial information engagement questionnaire

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA. Order Adopting Amendments to the North Carolina Code of Judicial Conduct

Working With The Difficult Lawyer

Techniques in Crossing the Scientific Witness Jane Clark

Guide to Judiciary Policy

Premise. The social mission and objectives

Emerging Ethical Issues in Renewable Energy Hosted by the Professional Responsibility and Environmental Law and Energy Committees

ETHICS FOR ENGINEERS 10/13/2017 I. INTRODUCTION

Board Conflict of Interest Policy

Questions: 1. May Lawyer file an affidavit for change of judge against Judge X in Defendant s case?

Guidelines for Professional Conduct

Professional Liability for Engineers. Presented by: Bill Henn Attorney Henn Lesperance PLC

Who Should Care About Legal Conflicts of Interest?

PMI MEMBER ETHICAL STANDARDS MEMBER CODE OF ETHICS

In the Circuit Court, Sixth Judicial Circuit In and for Pasco and Pinellas Counties, Florida

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE TITLE 17 ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION TABLE OF CONTENTS

Language Interpreters Policy

Committee Opinion July 22, 1998 THROUGH A TEMPORARY PLACEMENT SERVICE.

Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct for Judiciary Interpreters

a person enrolled in a course or unit in the University pursuant to Statute 5.1 Admission Selection and Enrolment;

Defense Counsel's Duties When Client Insists On Testifying Falsely

Ethical Considerations on Social Media EVIDENTIARY AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS WHEN USING SOCIAL MEDIA TO BUILD OR DEFEND A CASE.

HOW TO BE A SUCCESSFUL EXPERT WITNESS

Criminal Procedure Rules Part and Part 33A New Practice Direction

OBJECTION YOUR HONOUR!

DRAFT REVISED NORTHERN CHEYENNE LAW & ORDER CODE TITLE 6 RULES OF EVIDENCE CODE. Title 6 Page 1

West Virginia University Research Integrity Procedure Approved by the Faculty Senate May 9, 2011

Part I Arbitrator Qualifications

KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION Ethics Opinion KBA E-430 Issued: January 16, 2010

APTUS VALUE HOUSING FINANCE INDIA LIMITED (Aptus) WHISTLE BLOWER POLICY& VIGIL MECHANISM

Law Society of Alberta Code of Conduct

MRE 501 Privilege; General Rule

ADVOCATE MODEL RULE 3.1

Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas. Texas State Bar Ethics Rules HIGHLIGHTS (SELECTED EXCERPTS)

MARYLAND STATE RETIREMENT AND PENSION SYSTEM GOVERNANCE POLICIES. Adopted by the Board of Trustees

SELECT ILLINOIS RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

Referring to Article 110 of the Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo and the Law on Kosovo Prosecutorial Council (Nr.03/L-244)

THE LAW SOCIETY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA. In the matter of the Legal Profession Act, SBC 1998, c. 9. and a hearing concerning IMRAJ SINGH GILL APPLICANT

Board of Trustees By-laws. 1.1 Name The name of this corporation is "International Technological University," (the University or ITU ).

Code of Professional Conduct. The Law Society of Manitoba

CIVIL SOCIETY CODE OF CONDUCT

AMERICAN HOMES 4 RENT. Code of Ethics for Principal Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers

Whistle Blower Policy. NIF PRIVATE LIMITED, (Part), Block P & T Fazal Ganj, Kalpi Road, Kanpur (U.P.)

NOUVEAU MONDE MINING ENTERPRISES INC. (the Corporation ) WHISTLEBLOWING POLICY

GUIDELINES CONCERNING COURT APPOINTMENTS OF DECISION-MAKERS PURSUANT TO C.R.S

CHAPTER 20 FLORIDA REGISTERED PARALEGAL PROGRAM SUBCHAPTER 20-1 PREAMBLE RULE PURPOSE

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA INQUIRY CONCERNING A JUDGE NO CASE NO. 91,325

Depositions of Company Witnesses The Ethical Rules You Need to Know

SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INTEGRITY POLICY

TEXAS DISCIPLINARY RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT. (Including Amendments Effective May 1, 2018)

BOARD OF GOVERNORS BYLAWS Revised November 28, 2007

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO OPINION

Supreme Court of Florida

STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONALISM

NCAT Procedural Direction 3 EXPERT WITNESSES. This Procedural Direction applies to: Proceedings in all Divisions. (20 December 2013)

TEXAS DISCOVERY. Brock C. Akers CHAPTER 1 LAW REVISIONS TO TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE GOVERNING DISCOVERY

LUDWIG INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH LTD. SCIENTIFIC INTEGRITY POLICY Statement of Policy and Procedure (SPP) 203

Tribal Government Code of Conduct

ABA CRIMINAL JUSTICE STANDARDS COMMITTEE PROSECUTION FUNCTION STANDARDS PROPOSED REVISIONS

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE TITLE 17 ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION CHAPTER 100 GENERAL PROVISIONS

ANZRPTIP 1 ACTING AS AN EXPERT WITNESS. Please view the video for this Technical Information Paper on YouTube

TEXT OBTAINED BY WORLD WIDE WEB PAGE: STATE.MN.US; 29th APRIL 2003.

Research Misconduct Policy

Nova Scotia Barristers Society CODE OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 20, 2005

Whistleblower Protection 1 LAWS OF MALAYSIA. Act 711 WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT 2010

other person the opinion giver expressly authorizes to rely on the closing opinion.

Litigation Unveiled Click to edit Master title style

DALLAS BAR ASSOCIATION TRIAL SKILLS SECTION March 8, By: Robert L. Tobey Johnston Tobey, P.C.

Definitions. Misconduct in Research

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF BOSTON CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

Transcription:

So You are An Expert Witness? Want to Be A Defendant, Too? David A Domina Domina Law Group pc llo Omaha NE dominalaw.com

The Wheel of History Turns. From Absolute Immunity Absolute testimonial privilege is gone Matters not pertinent are not privileged No longer ends at credibility To Common Liability Exposure same as engaged professional Care requires investigation, analysis Assumptions require articulation

Experts Are Nothing New The Role of the Expert Witness Expert evidence: Not ordinarily admissible Experts : For Extraordinary Things. Ordinary things: Marriage. Divorce. Parenting. Child Abuse. If matters arise in our law which concern other sciences or faculties, we commonly apply for the aid of that science or faculty which it concerns Buckley v Rice Thomas (1554)

Duty, Honor, Valor Expert s Duty: Help Judge of Facts Where Qualified ~ This overrides any Obligation to Engaging Party ~ Duty overrides compensation & loyalty Adherence to Duty Makes Reputation. It Requires: ~ Genuine Qualifications ~ Objectivity ~ Informed, Testable Opinions ~ Proven or Provable Methods

Expansive Scope of Expert Service Risks of Expert for Anything Evidence Rule 702 ~Subject matter ~Witness qualified ~Testimony assist fact finder ~Reliable testimony

Risks of Expert Malfeasance Mistakes Happen ~ Misunderstood facts ~ Mis scheduled events ~ Misplaced data ~ Mis distributed data ~ Inadvertent disclosures Errors In Judgment Happen, Too ~ Exuberance ~ Professional diagnosis, analysis errors

Standards: Impartiality I. Expert Impartiality A. Serve with independence and objectivity, without regard to consequences. B. Impartially assist the court on relevant matters within area of expertise. C. Fully cooperate with retaining counsel, but shall remain independent and professional; avoid advocacy. D. Present complete and unbiased research relevant to the case and to expertʹs opinions. dominalaw.com

Standards: Confidentiality II. Confidentiality A. Understand rules of confidentiality applicable to case and jurisdiction. B. Assume all communications are subject to discovery unless instructed otherwise by retaining counsel on ethical grounds.

Standards: Fees III. Fees A. Seek fair reimbursement. Charge hourly fees Consider flat fee if based on reasonable value. B. No contingent fees. C. Use nonrefundable retainer where expert may be precluded from other work. D. Do not allow money to interfere with truthfulness or impartiality.

Standards: One Sided Talk IV. Ex Parte Communications A. Do not communicate with adverse counsel except through formal discovery and judicial procedure. B. Do not engage in communications with the judge or jurors.

Standards: Never Two Masters V. Conflicts of Interest A. Do not accept conflicting engagements with inconsistent opinions. B. Do not switch sides and violate a Clientʹs reasonable expectation of confidentiality. C. Do not withhold interests held in the outcome.

Professionalism I A. Accept only engagements within area of competence. Do not stretch. B. Ensure all tests, analysis, opinions are based on adequate, accepted methods. Disclose reliance, on experimental things. C. Be clear about the strength of each conclusion. Disclose inconclusive aspects, limitations or data insufficiencies. D. Update opinions for new information, and promptly report changes of opinions on any material matter.

Professionalism II E. Understand standards applicable to use of expertʹs opinion. F. Report expertʹs independent opinion. Discuss only contours, scope and methods. Make final product be the expertʹs. G. Do not hide or destroy discoverable documents or evidence. H. Do not present false, misleading opinions or data. I. Do not accept client conclusions; diligently investigate. J. Write Opinions that are a) are reasoned, b) based on analysis c) include material issues.

Children & Divorce APA Guidelines For Child Custody Eval ~ Help decide what is best ~ Child welfare is paramount ~ Focus on parenting attributes & child needs ~ Develop specialized professional competence ~ Be impartial ~ Be Culturally Informed

APA Guidelines II ~ Avoid Conflicts ~ Be timely & establish scope of evaluation ~ Use multiple methods ~ Use & assess data consistently ~ Never forget best interests of children ~ Create & maintain professional records

Liability Standards & Experts Immunity is Gone Responsibility has Arrived The judicial process will be enhanced only requiring that an expert witness render services to the degree of care, skill, and proficiency commonly exercised by the ordinarily skillful, careful and prudent members of their profession. LLMD of Mich, Inc., v Jackson Cross Co., 740 A2d 186, 191 (Pa 1999).

Family, Children : Expert & Med Mal Issues Michigan: Dyer v Trachtman (2004) Limited MD Patient Relationship. Nebraska: Yoder v Cotton (2010) Unlimited Relationship. Full malpractice standards used. Johnston, MD Neurology Today (2005) 11 Standards. (Paper, pp 7 8) dominalaw.com

What Is Expert Malpractice? Duty: Arises from Relationship. Standard of Care: What would reasonable expert in field do, or not do? Was the Standard met? If not, were Damages caused? What are the Damages?

Lawyers & Experts: How? Understand the Case Identify the Expertise Needed Make a Reasonable Search for a Witness Refrain from Hiring Charlatans Avoid Tampering: Incentives. False Facts Do Not Falsify Identities, Opinions Disclose the Expert s Warts

Witness Tampering, Intimidation Blackballing Subscribing to blackballing services Contributing to blackballing processes Be honest Test the expert within the rules Refrain from diversionary tactics It s A Courtroom, Not A Political Campaign!

Time Have Changed Experts Owe Duties. Standards Apply to them & All Individuals When Breached, Experts Have Exposure If Breaches Cause Damages, Experts Pay What s Wrong with That?

Experts, Lawyers, Courts Matter. So, Let s Do It Well. So You are An Expert Witness? Want to Be A Defendant, Too? David A Domina Omaha NE