Law Amendment and the FCPA Best Practices for Responding to a Chinese Government Commercial Bribery Investigation

Similar documents
Mexico's New Anti-Corruption Laws and Implementing Regulations: Private Entities and Individuals in the Crosshairs

Drafting Trademark Settlement Agreements to Resolve IP Disputes

Defeating Liability Waivers in Personal Injury Cases: Substantive and Procedural Strategies

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Deposing Rule 30(b)(6) Corporate Witnesses

Summary Judgment Motions: Advanced Strategies for Civil Litigation

Leveraging USPTO Technology Evolution Pilot Program

Third-Party Legal Opinions in Corporate Transactions

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Satya Narayan, Attorney, Royse Law Firm, Palo Alto, Calif.

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Defeating Rule 23(b)(3)'s Predominance Requirement Using Defenses and Counterclaims

Challenging Unfavorable ICANN Objection and Application Decisions

HIPAA Compliance During Litigation and Discovery

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Wilson Chu, Partner, McDermott Will & Emery, Dallas

New Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure: Impact on Chapter 7, 12 and 13 Secured Creditors

Environmental Obligations in Bankruptcy: Reconciling the Conflicting Goals of Bankruptcy and Environmental Laws

Presenting a live 90 minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Td Today s faculty features:

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Michael A. Brusca, Shareholder, Stark & Stark, Lawrenceville, N.J.

Provisional Patent Applications: Preserving IP Rights in First-to-File System

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Rendering Third-Party Legal Opinions on LLC Status, Power, Action, Enforceability and Membership Interests

Strategic Use of Joint Defense Agreements in Litigation: Avoiding Disqualification and Privilege Waivers

PRP Contribution Claims Under CERCLA Strategies for Cost Recovery Against Other Potentially Responsible Parties

RING POWER CORPORATION GLOBAL ANTI-CORRUPTION POLICY

Standards Related Patents and Standard Setting Organizations Navigating the Challenges of SSOs: Licensing, Disclosure and Litigation

Litigating Employment Discrimination

Preparing for and Navigating PTAB Appeals Before the Federal Circuit

Extraterritorial Reach of Lanham Act and Protection of IP Rights: Pursuing Foreign Infringers

Managing & Responding to Increasing Risks of Bribery & Corruption

Appellate Practice: Identifying Issues for Appeal, Drafting Questions Presented, and Briefing the Issues

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Structuring MOUs, LOIs, Term Sheets and Other Nonbinding Legal Documents

Defending Rule 30(b)(6) Corporate Depositions in Employment Litigation

Pleading Standards, Affirmative Defenses and Motions to Dismiss in Federal Court

Evidentiary Disclosures in Parallel Criminal and Civil Proceedings

Patent Licensing: Advanced Tactics

Article III Standing and Rule 23(b)(3) Certification: Emerging Litigation Trends

Presenting a live 90 minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Td Today s faculty features:

Anti- Bribery Policy. Date of Approval: 4 th February 2014 Date for Next Scheduled Review: February 2017 Review Body:

Best Buy Anti-Corruption Policy

Insurance Declaratory Judgment Actions and the Federal Abstention Doctrine: Strategies and Limitations

E-Discovery and Spoliation Issues: Litigation Pitfalls, Duty to Preserve, and Claw-Back Agreements

CHINESE SUPREME COURT AND PROCURATORATE ISSUE OPINIONS TO CLARIFY ISSUES RELATED TO BRIBERY

Leveraging Post-Grant Patent Proceedings Before the PTAB

Leveraging the AIA s Joinder Provision, Recent Decisions, and New Court Procedures in Defending Infringement Disputes

Managing Bribery and Corruption. The hands on Partner experience is the difference quickly getting to the core issues.

UCC Articles 8 and 9 and the Hague Securities Convention: Investment Property Update

NETCARE LIMITED CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ANTI-CORRUPTION POLICY POLICY NUMBER COR12 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PREPARED BY PREPARATION DATE JUNE 2014

Bribery and Corruption

Witness Examination Strategies in Employment Litigation Best Practices for Direct and Cross Examination of Lay Witnesses

Anti-Bribery and Corruption Policy

From a Case of a Multinational Pharmaceutical Company: A

Community Development and CSR: Managing Expectations & Balancing Interests

Patent Infringement Claims and Opinions of Counsel Leveraging Opinion Letters to Reduce the Risks of Liability and Enhanced Damages

2. WHY IS COMBATING CORRUPTION SO IMPORTANT FOR COMPANIES AND INVESTORS?

I. STATEMENT OF COMMITMENT AGAINST CORRUPTION, BRIBERY & EXTORTION

Spoliation of Evidence in Personal Injury Claims: Mitigation and Prevention

ANTI-BRIBERY AND ANTI-CORRUPTION POLICY. Guidelines for Compliance with the Canadian Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act

Qui Tam Actions: Guidance for Counsel for Managing Whistleblower Suits

Navigating Jurisdictional Determinations Under the Clean Water Act: Impact of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes

FCRA Class Actions in Employment on the Rise: Avoiding and Defending Claims

AVOIDING BRIBERY AND CORRUPTION POLICY

Structuring MOUs, LOIs, Term Sheets and Other Preliminary Agreements

The UK Bribery Act 2010 How Will It Impact the Life Sciences Industry and How Does It Compare With the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act?

1.3 The required standards of integrity confer a level of personal responsibility upon individuals. This Policy thus applies to:

To: All contacts in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland

GUIDANCE NOTE. Bribery Act June 2011

Anti-Bribery and Corruption Policy

E-Signatures and Electronic Loan Documentation: Complying with ESIGN/UETA, Interplay With the UCC

Mini Summit V Interaction of UK Bribery Act, New Chinese Anti Bribery Act Law, FCPA Asia Pacific National Anti-Corruption Laws

2. Anti-Bribery and Corruption Policy

Global Anti-Corruption Policy. I. Purpose. III. We Prohibit Bribery in All Its Forms

Opinions of Counsel in Cross-Border Financial Transactions

Navigating Section 112 Issues in IPR Proceedings: Using Section 112 as a Sword or a Shield

Liberty Global. Anti-Corruption. Legal 1 February 2017 Version 1 Internal

1. offering, promising or giving a bribe (in the UK or overseas); 2. requesting, agreeing to receive or accepting a bribe (in the UK or overseas);

New ERISA Supreme Court Rulings in Conkright and Hardt Leveraging Court Guidance on Deferential Review Standards and Attorney Fee Awards

Managing Patent Infringement Risk in Product Development

Anti-bribery policy. November 2017

Policy Summary. Overview Why is the policy required? Awareness and legal compliance with Bribery Act is required to minimise risk to UHI and its staff

ANTI BRIBERY POLICY. The University s commitment to honest and ethical trading

ANTI-BRIBERY POLICY 1. INTRODUCTION

Avoiding FCPA Violations in

Understanding the UK Bribery Act 2010: Extraterritorial Reach of the Act

Solving the CERCLA Statute of Limitations and Preemption Puzzles

ANTI-CORRUPTION AND BRIBERY POLICY - INCLUDING CODE OF PRACTICE ON BUSINESS GIFTS AND HOSPITALITY

Renishaw Group Anti-Bribery Policy

The LTE Group. Anti-Bribery Policy Produced by. The LTE Group. LTEG anti-bribery policy v4 06/2016

Proper Business Practices and Ethics Policy

Third Party Code of Conduct

Breach of Employment Contract Litigation: Contract Interpretation, Materiality of Breach, Defenses, Damages

Highlights from the Competition & Anti-Monopoly Law and Best Practices Conference Held by AllBright and ECUPL

Navigating Section 112 Issues in IPR Proceedings: Using Section 112 as a Sword or a Shield

It is the responsibility of all Fletcher Personnel to understand and comply with this Policy, including any reporting requirements set out below.

UK Bribery Act: impact on companies and what to expect

2010 UK Bribery Act. A Briefing for NGOs

UK Bribery Act. Document Reference: EXT008

PRIZE PROMOTIONS AROUND THE WORLD. Hong Kong

Focus on Leadership: SPAN Liaison

Effective Discovery Strategies in Class Action Litigation Leveraging Trends and Best Practices for Depositions, Expert Witnesses and E-Discovery

Transcription:

Presenting a live 90 minute webinar with interactive Q&A New Chinese Anti Corruption Law Amendment and the FCPA Best Practices for THURSDAY, AUGUST 25, 2011 1pm Eastern 12pm Central 11am Mountain 10am Pacific Td Today s faculty features: Amy L. Sommers, Partner, K&L Gates, Shanghai John Auerbach, Greater China Practice Leader, Fraud Investigation & Dispute Services, Ernst & Young (China) Advisory Limited, Shanghai, China The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10.

Conference Materials If you have not printed the conference materials for this program, please complete the following steps: Click on the + sign next to Conference Materials in the middle of the left- hand column on your screen. Click on the tab labeled Handouts that appears, and there you will see a PDF of the slides for today's program. Double click on the PDF and a separate page will open. Print the slides by clicking on the printer icon.

Continuing Education Credits FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY For CLE purposes, please let us know how many people are listening at your location by completing each of the following steps: Close the notification box In the chat box, type (1) your company name and (2) the number of attendees at your location Click the blue icon beside the box to send

Tips for Optimal Quality Sound Quality If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet connection. If the sound quality is not satisfactory and you are listening via your computer speakers, you may listen via the phone: dial 1-866-869-6667 and enter your PIN when prompted. Otherwise, please send us a chat or e-mail sound@straffordpub.com immediately so we can address the problem. If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance. Viewing Quality To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen, press the F11 key again.

Chinese Anti-Corruption Law Amendment and the FCPA Responding to a Chinese Government Commercial Bribery Investigation August 25, 2011 Amy Sommers John Auerbach

Topics 1. China s new anti-corruption amendment 2. Interplay with the FCPA 3. Chinese enforcement 4. Responding to Chinese government commercial bribery investigation: practical considerations Page 6

I. CHINA S NEW ANTI- CORRUPTION AMENDMENT Page 7

Bribery of Foreign Officials under PRC Law Previously, PRC law did not address cross-border bribery. Article 164 of the PRC Criminal Law dealt with bribes paid to employees of enterprises who are not government officials (i.e., bribes payable in a commercial context); As amended, Art 164 now provides for the Crime of Offering Bribes to Officials of Foreign Countries and International Public Organizations Part of China s effort to comply with the United Nations Convention Against Corruption, to which the PRC is a signatory. Prohibits entities and individuals from offering bribes to officials of fforeign countries ti and dinternational ti public organizations to secure illegitimate business benefits Page 8

Penalties Where payor is an individual, depending on the value of the bribes, s/he may be subject to imprisonment up to 10 years; Where the payor is an entity, criminal penalties will be imposed against the violating entity; Additionally, the supervisor chiefly responsible and other directly responsible personnel may also face imprisonment of up to 10 years; Where the violating individual or entity discloses the crime before being charged, penalties may be reduced or waived. Page 9

Open Questions What constitutes illegitimate business benefits? Includes reference to "officials of foreign countries and international public organizations," but does not define these terms. Does international public organization include foreign nongovernmental organizations? Will China take an expansive view of who is a foreign official for purposes of Art. 164? Foreign invested companies formed under PRC law would be subject to this prohibition >If a foreign company had a China rep office, could the foreign parent be liable? Page 10

Interpretations? The Supreme People s Court and the Procurator s Office will from time to time issue an interpretative release to resolve open questions associated with application of statutes or regulations. This has previously happened in the compliance field, such as in 2008 with the Opinion on Several Issues regarding Application of Laws in Respect of Commercial Bribery Criminal Cases. Some of the open questions around amended Art. 164 may be similarly addressed. Page 11

II. INTERPLAY WITH THE FCPA Page 12

FCPA and PRC Antibribery FCPA bribery of foreign officials China: bribery of officials in business outside of China China: bribery in commercial transactions China: bribery of officials in China Page 13

What is commercial bribery? PRC Criminal Law and PRC Anti-Unfair Competition Law both prohibit kickbacks, giving property in any form or providing other types of benefits or interests to the employees of another enterprise as commercial bribery Gifts/property to state employee official bribery Gifts/property to non-state employee commercial bribery Page 14

One case/two Views: PRC and United States From a commercial bribery perspective, pharma/health care a focus of concern Difference between US and PRC: improper benefits to employees of SOE hospitals/clinics US official i bribery PRC Comm l bribery Could be FCPA case under US law and commercial bribery case under PRC law Page 15

III. CHINESE ENFORCEMENT: CASE STUDIES Page 16

Commercial Bribery Enforcement 2011: Employee of Zhousan IMC-Yongyue Shipyard & Engineering Co., Ltd., a foreign-invested invested joint venture, convicted of receiving bribes from several other private companies to retain business; sentenced to 6 and a half years imprisonment and fined criminally 2010: Four Rio Tinto employees, including the General Manager a naturalized Australian citizen found guilty of accepting commercial bribes from local companies; sentenced up to 14 years imprisonment and criminal fines up to RMB 5 million Page 17

Enforcement Under PRC Law (cont.) 2009: Guangzhou Pepsi Cola Beverage Company, a subsidiary of PepsiCo, was fined RMB 700,000000 for giving bribes to 47 retailers and supermarkets in Foshan to display its products following certain requirements 2009: Two employees of Shenmei Beverage and Food Co., Ltd., partly owned subsidiary of Coca-Cola, arrested by police for receiving over $1.5 million in kickbacks from suppliers 2009: Employee of N.B.A. China arrested by police in bribery and kickback investigation Page 18

Enforcement Under PRC Law (cont.) 2009: Employee of Ying Zhi Jian ( 英之建公司 ), a Chinese company, convicted of giving benefits to Amway (China) Co., Ltd., subsidiary of Amway, to secure its position as a supplier; sentenced to 3 years imprisonment and criminally fined [Note: case did not reveal Amway (China) was investigated for receiving benefits] 2007: Eight managers of Carrefour s Beijing division were investigated and detained for receiving over RMB 1 million in bribes from suppliers 2007 report from Anbound Group, a Beijing-based consultant, estimates that over 60% of the 500,000 corruption investigations in the past decade involved foreign companies Page 19

IV. RESPONDING TO CHINESE GOVERNMENT COMMERCIAL BRIBERY INVESTIGATION: PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS Page 20

Enforcement Action Scenarios Modes of Contact Initial contact Inquiry Raid &Seizure Arrest / Detention ti Penalty / Negotiation Modes of Government Investigation Whistleblower initiated (former employees, competitors) Supply chain driven (customer intermediary company) Sector oriented sweeps Multi-departmental actions (AIC, PSB, Tax, Customs) Page 21

Enforcement Catalyst 1: Customer Kickback / Bribery Example 1: T&E Driven Kickback Company Contract / Sale Customer Falsified Sales Expense Relationship Claim Buying Influence Cash Gift Sales Rep Purchasing Mgr Page 22

Enforcement Catalyst 2: Intermediary - driven bribery Company Contract / sale Customer Fees Bogus service contract Buying influence Intermediary Shareholder Purchasing mgr Page 23

Types of Bribes Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate 2007 interpretation spells out expanded modes of bribery: Receiving stocks and shares as gifts; Buying property such as houses or automobiles at ridiculously low prices from those seeking favors; Making money in fixed gambling games or cooperating with others to run a company; Misusing a post to make profit for others and getting money or gifts after their official tenures; Making gprofit with the help of family members, relatives or close associates. Recent government focus stored value cards People who help officials get bribes covertly can be convicted as "collaborators". The same applies to those who arrange for people ready to bribe an official to get a job done illegally. Page 24

Typical Enforcement Life Cycle Complaint / Investigation Initial Contact Penalty No further contact Fact Finding Penalty No Penalty Penalty Negotiation Settlement / Resolution Page 25

Common Operational Concerns What is the nature of the issue / allegation? How specific are the claims? Who are the entities / individuals implicated? What type of information is needed to verify and what is the availability/format of data? How much time provided between initial and subsequent contact with the government? Are there personal privacy or commercial confidentiality concerns? Page 26

Common Approaches Key Operational Question: What is our potential exposure? Is there factual basis to the allegation? If so, what is the potential scope and depth of exposure? Qualitative ti fact finding Interviews External verification Computer forensics Transactional review Quantitative Analysis Quantification of questionable payments Estimated proceeds of illicit activity Page 27

Questions

Amy L. Sommers (amy.sommers@klgates.com) Amy L. Sommers strong skills in corporate structuring, governance and operations issues in China make her a valued resource to the clients she counsels. A former Chair of the China Committee of the American Bar Association s Section of International Law, Ms. Sommers is a frequent speaker and commentator on China issues. Her involvement in China goes back over 25 years, when she first started studying Mandarin, later developing deep appreciation of China s history, politics, culture and legal system. Her clients benefit from her ability to bring these insights to bear on their strategic China projects. Ms. Sommers is the recipient of the 2007 award for Professional Excellence from the Expatriate Professional Women s Society of Shanghai. She is a Vice Chair of the International Anticorruption Committee of the ABA s Section of International Law. K&L Gates is the China partner firm for TRACE International and Ms. Sommers is responsible for managing that commitment. Copyright: K&L Gates 2011. The information in this presentation is not intended as legal advice; please consult your legal counsel for guidance. Page 29

John C. Auerbach (john.auerbach@cn.ey.com) John is Managing Partner for Greater China of Ernst & Young s Fraud Investigation & Dispute Services practice. He specializes in fraud investigations and risk management consulting for businesses operating in the People s Republic of China and throughout East and Southeast Asia. He is a fluent speaker of Mandarin Chinese. John has led a broad range of forensic, pre-transactional due diligence and risk management consulting assignments in Hong Kong, China and the rest of Asia. He has assisted a wide variety of multinational companies in investigating fraud and irregularities in their Asia operations, frequently with the involvement of U.S. law enforcement and regulatory authorities. He has a particular focus on conducting Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) investigations and risk assessments in China. John has also led a number of business intelligence projects for multinational companies focused on the competitive and strategic environment in China and other Asian emerging markets. He has also overseen numerous pre-transactional due diligence reviews for private equity investors throughout Asia. Page 30