Criminal Justice in America CJ Chapter 11 James J. Drylie, Ph.D.

Similar documents
Sentencing: The imposition of a criminal sanction by a judicial authority. (p.260)

Chapter 6 Sentencing and Corrections

Chapter 9. Sentencing, Appeals, and the Death Penalty

CHAPTER 14 PUNISHMENT AND SENTENCING CHAPTER OUTLINE. I. Introduction. II. Sentencing Rationales. A. Retribution. B. Deterrence. C.

SECTION I: GENERAL INFORMATION {Indicate if analysis is on an original bill, amendment, substitute or a correction of a previous bill}

REVISOR XX/BR

$100 Question from Sentencing. The imposition of a criminal sanction by a sentencing authority, such as a judge.

NC Death Penalty: History & Overview

State Issue 1 The Neighborhood Safety, Drug Treatment, and Rehabilitation Amendment

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Superior Court of Washington For Pierce County

Selected Ohio Felony Sentencing Statutes Ohio Rev. Code Ann

80th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Senate Bill 966 SUMMARY

80th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Senate Bill 1007 SUMMARY

Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendment Rights

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 100 1

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 1282

Ohio Felony Sentencing Statutes Ohio Rev. Code Ann (2018)

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL INTRODUCED BY GREENLEAF, LEACH, HUGHES, SCHWANK, YUDICHAK, BROWNE AND STREET, MARCH 12, 2018 AN ACT

SENATE, No. 881 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 215th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2012 SESSION

CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT BRIEF HOUSE BILL NO HB 2490 would amend various statutes related to criminal sentencing.

Imprisonment is just one of several sentencing options.

AGENCY BILL ANALYSIS 2017 REGULAR SESSION WITHIN 24 HOURS OF BILL POSTING, ANALYSIS TO: and

Montana's Death Penalty after State v. McKenzie

8th and 9th Amendments. Joseph Bu, Jalynne Li, Courtney Musmann, Perah Ralin, Celia Zeiger Period 1

(1) the nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and characteristics of the defendant;

Questioning Capital Punishment: Law, Policy, and Practice James R. Acker

Francis Burt Law Education Programme

House Bill 3078 Ordered by the House June 2 Including House Amendments dated June 2

For An Act To Be Entitled

The Nebraska Death Penalty Study: An Interdisciplinary Symposium

AN ACT. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Ohio:

House Bill 3078 Ordered by the House June 30 Including House Amendments dated June 2 and June 30

Criminal Justice A Brief Introduction

CERTIFICATION PROCEEDING

Chapter 12 CAPITAL PUNISHMENT. Introduction to Corrections CJC 2000 Darren Mingear

COKER V. GEORGIA United States Supreme Court 433 U.S. 584, 97 S.Ct. 2861, 53 L.Ed.2d 982 (1977)

MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2018

6/13/2016. Second Chances Setting Aside a Juvenile Adjudication. Why Expunge an Adjudication (aren t juvenile records sealed)?

MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2017

CHAPTER 186. (Senate Bill 279) Criminal Law Death Penalty Repeal Evidence

Sentencing decision Fixing the punishment by Judge An analyze of main determinants in Germany

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 116,893 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, TONY JAY MEYER, Appellant.

End of First Nine Weeks

The Cost-Benefit Analysis of Crime*

CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT. further agrees to amend the bill as printed with Senate Committee amendments, as follows:

SENATE, Nos. 171 and 2471 STATE OF NEW JERSEY 212th LEGISLATURE

Sentencing Factors that Limit Judicial Discretion and Influence Plea Bargaining

In the Case of the Central City Drug Bust, suppose Harry and Daisy

The Death Penalty is Cruel and Unusual Punishment for the Crime of Rape - Even the Rape of a Child

A Bill Regular Session, 2017 SENATE BILL 294

Texas Administrative Code

Jurisdiction Profile: Alabama

CHAPTER 14. Criminal Law and Juvenile Law

For the purposes of this article, the following terms have the following meanings:

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO HOUSE BILL 3078

Juvenile Scripts SCRIPT FOR DETENTION HEARING...2 SCRIPT FOR AN ADJUDICATION HEARING IN WHICH THE RESPONDENT PLEADS TRUE...7

CAUSE NUMBER 00 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE COUNTY CRIMINAL V. COURT AT LAW NUMBER 00 DEFENDANT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

THE ABC S OF CO AND ACCA FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER CJA PANEL SEMINAR DECEMBER 15, 2017

The Death Penalty for Rape - Cruel and Unusual Punishment?

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 117,316 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, DEJUAN Y. ALLEN, Appellant.

Practice Test. Law & the Courts -1-

Session of SENATE BILL No By Committee on Judiciary 2-1

DETAILED CONTENTS PART I: FOUNDATIONS OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE 1. Learning Activity 20 Suggested Websites 20 Student Study Site 21

JOINT LEGISLATIVE AUDIT AND REVIEW COMMISSION The Virginia General Assembly COMMISSION DRAFT. Review of Virginia s System of Capital Punishment

2/21/2011 AMERICAN CORRECTIONS 9 TH EDITION. Three elements:

In the Supreme Court of the United States

Case 5:06-cr TBR Document 101 Filed 03/21/2008 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT PADUCAH

ORDINANCE NO. 14,500

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, Shawn PICKERING, Defendant-Appellee. No United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

SEE NO EVIL, HEAR NO EVIL, SPEAK NO EVIL: AN ARGUMENT FOR A JURY DETERMINATION OF THE ENMUND/TISON CULPABILITY FACTORS IN CAPITAL FELONY MURDER CASES

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE,

ll1. THE SENTENCING COMMISSION

Glossary of Criminal Justice Sentencing Terms

ll1. THE SENTENCING COMMISSION

(4) When the victim is under the age of twelve years. Lack of knowledge of the victim's age shall not be a defense.

Criminal Law - Death Penalty: Jury Discretion Bridled

Colorado Legislative Council Staff

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 117,322. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, JERRY D. RICE, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

Case 2:08-cr wks Document 106 Filed 08/25/2009 U.S. Page DISTRICT 1 of 7 coun: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT

CAMBIARE NASC 2018 AUGUST 15, 2018

42 USC NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

No. 110,226 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, ABIGAIL REED, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

214 Part III Homicide and Related Issues

The defendant has been charged with first degree murder.

Florida Senate SB 170 By Senator Lynn

Remembering Furman s Comparative Proportionality: A Response to Smith and Staihar

685 So.2d 1063 Page 1 Rehearing Denied. STATE of Louisiana v. Anthony WILSON. STATE of Louisiana v. Patrick Dewayne BETHLEY.

AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONALISM VOLUME II: RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES Howard Gillman Mark A. Graber Keith E. Whittington. Supplementary Material

Session of HOUSE BILL No By Committee on Corrections and Juvenile Justice 1-18

Jurisdiction Profile: Arkansas

VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY SESSION

Title 204. Judicial System General Provisions Part VIII Criminal Sentencing Chapter 303. Sentencing Guidelines

Federal Capital Offenses: An Abridged Overview of Substantive and Procedural Law

In the Supreme Court of the United States

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 7035

The 1977 Illinois Death Penalty Statute: Does It Comply with Constitutional Standards

Transcription:

Criminal Justice in America CJ 2600 Chapter 11 James J. Drylie, Ph.D.

Sentencing A sentence is the imposition of a sanction by a judicial authority on a person(s) convicted of a criminal offense or crime. The five goals of contemporary sentencing Retribution Incapacitation Deterrence Rehabilitation Restoration

Retribution The act of taking revenge on criminal offender. This type of punishment is based on the perceived need for vengeance. Grounded in religious dictum of an eye for an eye. Lex talonis Retribution is not an avocation for excessive punishment. The punishment must fit the crime.

Incapacitation This advocates the use of punishment to reduce the likelihood that the offender will commit future offenses. This type of punishment seeks to protect innocent members of society from offenders who might harm them. Modern incapacitation strategies separate offenders from the community, not necessarily through incarceration. Requires restraint, not punishment. Chemical castration is one example.

Deterrence A goal of criminal sentencing that seeks to inhibit criminal behavior through the fear of punishment. Two types of deterrence: General strives to influence behavior in those not yet arrested, but who may be tempted. Specific seeks to reduce the likelihood of recidivism.

Rehabilitation The premise of rehabilitation is the belief that the offender can be reformed. Bad behavior can be modified and changed to conform to societal norms. The juvenile justice system developed and evolved under this principle.

Restoration The focus here is on the victim. This type of criminal sentencing has the goal of making the victim whole again. The community is included in this as well. An offense/crime harms individuals as well as the community.

Restorative justice This is a sentencing model that builds on restitution and community participation in an attempt to assist the victim. Also referred to as balanced and restorative justice. Balance is achieved by giving equal consideration to community safety and offender accountability. Focuses on crime as a harm and justice as repairing the harm.

Interderminate Sentencing A model of criminal punishment that encourages rehabilitation through the use of general and relatively unspecific sentences. A sentence of 3-5 years for robbery. The presumption is that offenders will participate in their own rehabilitation. Time off for good behavior is a common incentive.

Determinate Determinate Sentencing Presumptive Sentencing A model of criminal punishment that is structured in which the offender is given a fixed term of imprisonment. Time off for good behavior is a possibility. Presumptive The following conditions must be met: Appropriate sentence determined by sentencing guidelines Sentence falls within the range Mechanism for review for departures from guide

Sentencing considerations Aggravating circumstances Relate to the commission of the crime that increases the gravity of the offense. Depravity Extreme indifference Premeditation Mitigating circumstances Relate to the possibility of reduced blameworthiness. Ignorance Emotional state Physical state Addiction

Mandatory Sentencing A structures sentence scheme that allows no leeway in the nature of the sentence. Clearly enumerated punishments are mandated for specific crimes and habiutal offenders 3-strike laws

Diversion The official suspension of criminal or juvenile proceedings against the alleged offender at any point after a recorded intake, but before the entering of a judgment.

Victim Rights A grassroots movement in the 1970s resulted in the involvement of crime victims and their survivors in trial and sentencing phases. President George W. Bush warned that crime victims should not and could not be treated as irrelevant bystanders, resulting in a second form of victimzation.

Victim-Impact Statements This is the in-court use of victim- or survivor-supplied information by sentencing authorities seeking to make an informed sentencing decision. Describes Losses Suffering Trauma

Capital Punishment The death penalty is the most extreme of all sentence options. A capital offense is one that is punishable by death. It is estimated that close to 19,000 legal executions have been carried out in the United States since 1608. Presently, the federal government and 34 of 50 states permit execution. http://www.stateline.org/live/viewpage.action?sitenodeid=136&languageid=1&contentid=25995

Crimes punishable by death Not all jurisdictions permit execution for a standardized list of crimes. Of the 34 states and the federal government. The crime of 1 st degree murder is punishable by death. The federal government may execute for treason. Other states allow for execution for Kidnapping Aggravated sexual assault Murder of a police/corrections officer

Landmark US Supreme Court cases Furman v. Georgia (1972). The court recognized evolving standards of decency that might necessitate a reconsideration of the Eight Amendment. In a 5-4 ruling Furman invalidated the Georgia death penalty due to unguided discretion in the use of the penalty. The death penalty in Georgia was seen as arbitrary and capricious. http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=408&invol=238

Gregg v. Georgia (1978).The Court formally approved the two-step trial procedure in capital cases. The Court found that the two-step process ensured the separation of the highly personal information needed in a sentencing decision from the kind of information reasonable permissible in a jury trial. Post-Gregg decisions set limits on the use of the death penalty. Coker v. Georgia (1972) struck down a law allowing for execution for the rape of an adult woman. http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=433&invol=584

Death Penalty Websites http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/ http://www.prodeathpenalty.com/ http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/13/ar2007121301302.html http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/committees/dpsc_final.pdf http://www.amnestyusa.org/death-penalty/death-penalty-facts/death-penalty-trends/page.do?id=1011572