vs. OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS DISCOVERY AND DOCKET CONTROL PLAN FOR LEVEL 3 CASE ( PLAN )

Similar documents
Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 212 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 5

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO. : Plaintiff : vs. : FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER : Case No. Defendant :

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE JON S.

INDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES JUDGE SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN

Case 1:11-cv MGC Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/17/2011 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF JACKSON BUSINESS COURT DIVISION. via telephone (check one) /

THE HONORABLE MEL DICKSTEIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT PRACTICE POINTERS & PREFERENCES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DOCKET CONTROL ORDER STEP ACTION RULE DATE DUE 1

P R E T R I A L O R D E R

LegalFormsForTexas.Com

NO. V. AT LAW NO. 1. Defendant(s). ELLIS COUNTY, TEXAS. FINAL PRETRIAL SUBMISSION (CPS Trial)

CASE NO: FORECLOSURE SCHEDULING ORDER. 1. Any prior order referring this case to Senior Judge Sandra Taylor is hereby VACATED.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

INDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES FOR CIVIL CASES. Lorna G. Schofield United States District Judge

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NO. V. AT LAW NO. 1. Defendant(s). ELLIS COUNTY, TEXAS. FINAL PRETRIAL SUBMISSION [Required For Bench Trials over two (2) hours]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER

JUSTICE JEFFREY K. OING PART 48 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) UNIFORM SCHEDULING ORDER

PCLR 7 MOTIONS: JUDGES AND COMMISSIONERS

P R E T R I A L O R D E R

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 9:01-cv MHS-KFG Document 72 Filed 08/16/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1935

7 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT JUSTICE AND LOCAL RULES

COMMERCIAL DIVISION PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE ORDER PURSUANT TO PART 202 OF THE UNIFORM CIVIL RULES FOR THE SUPREME COURT KINGS COUNTY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CIVIL CASES Nelson S. Román, United States District Judge. Courtroom Deputy Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS [MARSHALL / TYLER / TEXARKANA] DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv LTS Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 7

P R E T R I A L O R D E R

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF (****) Case No. The Discovery Status Conference came before Discovery Referee on.

Case 3:16-cv CRS-CHL Document 36 Filed 06/29/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 423

ONONDAGA COUNTY JUSTICES AND LOCAL RULES

Case 4:04-cv RAS Document 41 Filed 12/09/2004 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

LOCAL SMITH COUNTY RULES OF CIVIL TRIAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURTS AND COUNTY COURTS AT LAW SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

CASE NUMBER: DIV 71. It appearing that this case is at issue and can be set for trial, it is ORDERED as follows:

SUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY - IAS PART 56 PART RULES & PROCEDURES

Case 1:11-cv JEM Document 60 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/22/2011 Page 1 of 8

Judicial Practice Preferences Circuit Civil/Section 11

PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURES & PROTOCOL FOR JURY TRIALS & REFERRAL TO MEDIATION Revised March 2, 2018 (to correct web link only)

LEWIS A. KAPLAN United States District Judge United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007

INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PASCO COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION. Case No. 51-

UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - EASTERN DIVISION

Judicial Practice Preferences Circuit Civil (Revised March 2018)

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CASE NUMBER: UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

Supreme Court of the State of New York County of Nassau IAS Trial Part 22 Part Rules Updated: January 25, 2018

Mastering Civil Procedure Checklist

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

being preempted by the court's criminal calendar.

UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRE-TRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

LOCAL COURT RULES. 39th Judicial Circuit

Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures

COURT RULES OF THE HONORABLE RICHARD MOTT, J.S.C. 401 Union Street Columbia County Courthouse (Temporary)

Judicial Assistant s > ALWAYS copy opposing counsel(s) on correspondence to the Court

AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION

Guidelines & Procedures Civil Div. 35

COMMERCIAL CALENDAR I (Effective January 30, 2012)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendant/s.

Information or instructions: Motion Consent of Client & Order to substitute counsel PREVIEW

HAWAII ADMINISTRATIVE RULES TITLE 12 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS SUBTITLE 7 BOARDS CHAPTER 47

COMMERCIAL CALENDAR N (Effective November 17, 2010)

FORM 4. RULE 26(f) REPORT (PATENT CASES) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT CHANCERY DIVISION CALENDAR 7 COURTROOM 2405 JUDGE DIANE J. LARSEN STANDING ORDER 2.

CALENDAR Q. JUDGE PATRICK J. SHERLOCK 2007 RICHARD J. DALEY CENTER CHICAGO, ILLINOIS fax

These rules shall be known as the Local Rules for Columbia and Montour Counties, the 26 th Judicial District, and shall be cited as L.R. No.

Case: 5:14-cv JRA Doc #: 29 Filed: 01/28/15 1 of 6. PageID #: 284 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

KITSAP COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT STATE OF WASHINGTON

Information or instructions: Combined discovery requests, admissions, production of documents and interrogatories

Honorable Judge Thomas Ramsberger 545 First Avenue North, Room 200 St. Petersburg, FL JURY TRIAL WEEKS * ALL ONE (1) WEEK DOCKETS *

COUNTY COURT JUDGE GIUSEPPINA MIRANDA PROCEDURES FOR DIVISION 52. (Amended May 1, 2017)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs,

COMMERCIAL CALENDAR N (Effective February 8, 2013)

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) )

*(CONSOLIDATED INTO DOCKET NO. 3464) Docket Number: 3643 PRO-SPEC PAINTING, INC. Robert D. Ardizzi, Esquire David S. Makara, Esquire VS.

Proposed Rules for First Reading page 2. Rule 4.3 Withdrawal page 2. Rule 5.1 Prompt Completion page 5

WYOMING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR CIRCUIT COURTS

Filed & Entered: 03/14/2016

RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE NOTICE

Civil Litigation Forms Library

Practices for Part 3

Chapter 6 MOTIONS. 6.1 Vocabulary Introduction Regular Motions 7

PART FAMILY LAW

RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART ONE RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER n: DISPUTE RESOLUTION

PART RULES HONORABLE MARIA G. ROSA New York State Supreme Court Dutchess County Supreme Court 10 Market Street Poughkeepsie, New York 12601

STREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES

Case GLT Doc 644 Filed 06/30/17 Entered 06/30/17 13:52:10 FILED Desc Main Document Page 1 of 20

Guidelines & Procedures Civil Div. 37

BEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

GENERAL ORDER FOR LUCAS COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION. damages for alleged exposure to asbestos or asbestos-containing products; that many of the

ARBITRATION RULES. Arbitration Rules Archive. 1. Agreement of Parties

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SONOMA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Title 255 LOCAL COURT RULES

Policies and Procedures for Circuit Civil Division 35

Transcription:

Eff. 04/11/2014 CAUSE NO. IN THE DISTRICT COURT vs. OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS 67TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT DISCOVERY AND DOCKET CONTROL PLAN FOR LEVEL 3 CASE ( PLAN ) In accordance with Rules 166, 190 and 19 of the TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, the Court makes the following order and sets the following deadlines: TRIAL SETTING 1. TRIAL SETTING. The trial of this cause is set for this date at 8:30 AM. Reset or continuance of this date will in no way alter any deadlines herein or as established by the TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, unless specifically provided for in this Plan after motion showing good cause. Reset or continuance of the Trial Setting will not alter any deadline established in this Order or established by the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, unless specifically provided by order after motion showing good cause. PRETRIAL MATTERS (Court will set) 2. PRETRIAL HEARING. A pretrial hearing shall be held on this date at which time any pending motions including motions in limine, special exceptions, depositions objections or other pretrial matters must be presented to the Court in advance of trial for consideration. At this time, each party must designate deposition testimony that each party intends to use at trial and provide each party with specific deposition excerpts. (See #20 below) Prior to this hearing, all attorneys must attempt to reach agreements on various motions. 3. JOINDER OF PARTIES / DESIGNATION OF RESPONSIBLE THIRD PARTIES. No additional parties may be joined after this date except on motion for leave showing good cause. This paragraph does not alter the requirements of TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 38. NOTE: The party joining an additional party must serve a copy of this Plan on the new party concurrently with the pleading joining the new party. Additionally, the designation of Responsible Third Party provided in CPRC 33.004, must be made by this date. Discovery and Docket Control Plan for Level 3 Case - 67th District Court Page 1 of 6

_ 4. FOREIGN LAW. Motions to determine law of another state or country must be filed by this date. Failure to do so is a waiver of such contention and Texas law will apply. 5. PLAINTIFF S EXPERT DESIGNATIONS. Plaintiff must designate its experts (name, address, telephone number and subject of testimony) and provide reports by this date. 6. DEFENDANT S EXPERT DESIGNATIONS. Defendant must designate its experts (name, address, telephone number and subject of testimony) and provide reports by this date. 7. PLAINTIFF S REBUTTAL EXPERT DESIGNATIONS. Plaintiff must designate rebuttal experts (name, address, telephone number and subject of testimony) and provide reports by this date. 8. DEFENDANT S REBUTTAL EXPERT DESIGNATION. Defendant must designate rebuttal experts (name, address, telephone number and subject of testimony) and provide reports by this date. 9. DISCOVERY COMPLETION DATE. No discovery may be propounded which requires an answer after this date. All supplemental answers to written discovery requests served on the parties by opposing and other parties, including requests for disclosures, written interrogatories, requests for production and any other written discovery requests and motions must be completed by this date. The parties may serve written interrogatories, excluding interrogatories asking a party only to identify or to authenticate specific documents. Each discrete subpart of an interrogatory is considered a separate interrogatory. _ 10. DEPOSITIONS COMPLETION DATE. The parties are required to complete oral and written depositions, including the depositions of expert witnesses by this date. No side may examine or cross examine an individual witness or expert for more than hours under TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 199.5. Additional time may be requested by motion and after hearing. 11. PLAINTIFF S AMENDED PLEADINGS. Plaintiff shall file with the Court and serve Defendant s and any other party s of record attorney of record with any amended pleadings by this date. No additional theories or allegations shall be pled after this date without prior leave of court based upon a showing of good Discovery and Docket Control Plan for Level 3 Case - 67th District Court Page 2 of 6

cause or reason by the Plaintiff or by written agreement of the parties pursuant to Rule 11 of the TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 12. DEFENDANT S AMENDED PLEADINGS. Defendant shall file with the Court and serve Plaintiff s and any other party s of record attorney with any amended pleadings, including any and all affirmative defenses and/or special exceptions in response to Plaintiffs amended pleadings by this date. No additional affirmative defenses, inferential rebuttal defenses, or any other defensive theories shall be pled after this date without prior leave of court based upon a showing of good cause or reason by the Defendant or by written agreement of the parties pursuant to Rule 11 of the TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 13. PLAINTIFF S SUPPLEMENTAL PLEADINGS and SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS. Plaintiff shall file with the Court and serve Defendant s and any other party s of record attorney with amended and/or supplemental pleadings and/or special exceptions in response to Defendant s amended or supplemental pleadings and/or special exceptions on or before this date. Except in response to Defendant s supplemental or amended pleadings, no additional theories or allegations shall be pled at this time by Plaintiff without prior leave of court based upon a showing of good cause or reason by Plaintiff or written agreement of the parties pursuant to Rule 11 of the TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 14. DEFENDANT S SUPPLEMENTAL PLEADINGS and SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS. Defendant shall file with the Court and serve Plaintiff s and other party s attorney of record with amended and/or supplemental pleadings and/or special exceptions in response to Plaintiff s amended or supplemental pleadings and/or special exceptions on or before this date. Except in response to Plaintiff s supplemental or amended pleadings, no additional theories or allegations shall be pled at this time by the Defendant without prior leave of court based upon a showing of good cause or reason by Defendant or written agreement of the parties pursuant to Rule 11 of the TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. 15. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION/MEDIATION. The parties and their attorneys, along with all parties having full and final settlement authority shall attend a settlement conference or an alternative dispute resolution in the nature of a mediation conference to encourage peaceful resolution of this matter on or before this date. If the parties are unable to agree upon a mediator, the parties will notify the Court and the Court will appoint a mediator to serve in this case. Any objections to the mediator or to mediation must be filed with the Court and with Discovery and Docket Control Plan for Level 3 Case - 67th District Court Page 3 of 6

all parties no later than ten (10) days prior to the scheduled mediation conference. 16. MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Parties may prepare and file any motions for summary judgment, including no evidence motions, but without leave of Court for good cause shown, any hearings on any such summary judgment motion will not be scheduled with the Court until after an adequate time for discovery has passed on or after this date. 17. MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY ( DAUBERT- ROBINSON CHALLENGES). Parties shall file any motions to exclude expert testimony based on qualifications, relevancy and reliability under Rule 702 of the TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE and the Daubert-Robinson standards by this date. 18. HEARING ON DAUBERT-ROBINSON CHALLENGES. Hearing on Motions to Exclude Expert Testimony Based on Qualifications, Relevancy and Reliability must be held on or before this date. (No less than 60 days before trial). REQUIREMENTS FOR DAUBERT-ROBINSON CHALLENGES. (a) (b) Affidavits, depositions excerpts and all evidence for the prima facie challenge to an expert witness must be filed 15 days before the hearing date. The challenge to the expert must specify every aspect of the expert or the opinion or the basis for the opinion that is being challenged; failure to specify a ground for a challenge is a waiver of that challenge. Direct testimony and all other evidence in support of the challenged expert must be reduced to affidavits or deposition excerpts of each and all witnesses to be used and such material filed with the Court no later than 4:00 PM four (4) days before the scheduled hearing. Such evidence must be exchanged so as to be received in opposing counsel s offices by 5:00 PM four (4) days before the scheduled hearing. Facsimile transmission received by that time, if receipt is confirmed by telephone, shall be the same as hand delivery for the purpose of Rule 21a of the TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. (Court will set) 19. TRIAL DOCUMENTS. The following must be filed with the Court by NOON and copies served on all opposing parties. Originals for the Court File (two-hole punched on top): Exhibit List A list separately identifying each exhibit the party expects to offer during the trial. Fact Witness List (separate document from Exhibit List) A list including the name, address, phone number and topic of testimony of each fact witness who may be called at trial must be exchanged with counsel by this date. Designations for Discovery and Docket Control Plan for Level 3 Case - 67th District Court Page 4 of 6

videotaped depositions must be filed by this date and time. All objections to such deposition designations must be filed prior to or at the pretrial conference. Motion in Limine (with separate Order for Court s ruling) and any other pretrial motions not yet filed with the Court. Proposed Jury Questions/Instructions (or Findings of Fact /Conclusions of Law) (The pleading should be named [Name of Party] s Proposed Jury Questions and Instructions and copied on a Microsoft Word disk. The pleading on this disk should be in 12 pitch Arial or comparable font, free of any typographical emphasis i.e. bolding, all caps, underlining, italics, etc., free of case cites or footnotes, and labeled on the disk with the case style and submitting party s name. This document on disk should be exactly as it would be presented to a jury without signature blocks for the Judge for granting, denying or modifying any requests. This disk may be delivered to the Court on day of trial.) Vocabulary List (if one is filed) - Required in medical malpractice cases. Courtesy Copies for Court Reporter (To be delivered to Coordinator) Exhibit List Witness List Vocabulary List 20. REGARDING EXHIBITS (To be brought to Court on day of trial): All exhibits* shall be PRE-MARKED, three-hole punched on the left side** and in a three-ring binder notebook with numbered index tabs and the notebook labeled as to which party s exhibits. If you are not able to provide a notebook, please have the exhibits threehole punched and we will provide a notebook when you arrive. *See Tarrant County Local Rule #3.0. **If three-hole punching the original exhibit will destroy a part of the exhibit, such exhibit may be placed in a plastic envelope in the exhibit notebook. The Court can provide such plastic envelope if needed. NOTE: This Discovery and Docket Control Plan for Level 3 Cases (the Plan ) controls the procedures in this case and, to the extent that the Plan changes deadlines in the TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE and any Local Rules of the Tarrant County District Courts, the Plan shall prevail. All parties shall comply with the Plan unless it is modified by the trial court by written order or oral statement on the record in this case before or during the trial of this case to prevent manifest injustice or as required by Rule 190.4 of the TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. By written agreement of the parties pursuant to Rule 11 of the TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, all deadlines may be modified except dates set for Trial Setting, Pretrial Hearing, and Daubert-Robinson challenges. All statutory deadlines established by Chapter 74 of the TEXAS CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE are not controlled by this Plan. Discovery and Docket Control Plan for Level 3 Case - 67th District Court Page 5 of 6

Additionally, approval of this Plan by all attorneys and this Court does not represent an agreement by the parties and approval by this Court of modifying any statutory deadlines except those deadlines found in the TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE and any Local Rules of the Tarrant County District Courts. The parties are severally responsible for providing a copy of this Scheduling Order to all parties joined and/or attorneys making an appearance after the date this order is signed. SIGNED this the day of, 20. APPROVED: (Signatures of Attorneys - Fax signatures are acceptable) DONALD J. COSBY, JUDGE PRESIDING Plaintiff Defendant Discovery and Docket Control Plan for Level 3 Case - 67th District Court Page 6 of 6