World Peace Index Its Significance and Contribution to the Scientific Study of World Peace

Similar documents
GLOBAL RISKS OF CONCERN TO BUSINESS WEF EXECUTIVE OPINION SURVEY RESULTS SEPTEMBER 2017

The National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) forcibly returned 412 persons in December 2017, and 166 of these were convicted offenders.

World Refugee Survey, 2001

The Multidimensional Financial Inclusion MIFI 1

A Partial Solution. To the Fundamental Problem of Causal Inference

Human Resources in R&D

Figure 2: Range of scores, Global Gender Gap Index and subindexes, 2016

Delays in the registration process may mean that the real figure is higher.

Contracting Parties to the Ramsar Convention

SEVERANCE PAY POLICIES AROUND THE WORLD

Regional Scores. African countries Press Freedom Ratings 2001

Countries for which a visa is required to enter Colombia

LIST OF CHINESE EMBASSIES OVERSEAS Extracted from Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People s Republic of China *

2018 Social Progress Index

Proposed Indicative Scale of Contributions for 2016 and 2017

Collective Intelligence Daudi Were, Project

Country pairings for the second cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption

Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption: country pairings for the second review cycle

The NPIS is responsible for forcibly returning those who are not entitled to stay in Norway.

VACATION AND OTHER LEAVE POLICIES AROUND THE WORLD

Sex ratio at birth (converted to female-over-male ratio) Ratio: female healthy life expectancy over male value

SCALE OF ASSESSMENT OF MEMBERS' CONTRIBUTIONS FOR 1994

HUMAN RESOURCES IN R&D

Diplomatic Conference to Conclude a Treaty to Facilitate Access to Published Works by Visually Impaired Persons and Persons with Print Disabilities

Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption: country pairings for the second review cycle

Return of convicted offenders

LIST OF CONTRACTING STATES AND OTHER SIGNATORIES OF THE CONVENTION (as of January 11, 2018)

India, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Nepal and Sri Lanka: Korea (for vaccine product only):

APPENDIX 1: MEASURES OF CAPITALISM AND POLITICAL FREEDOM

Country pairings for the second review cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption

The Conference Board Total Economy Database Summary Tables November 2016

Copyright Act - Subsidiary Legislation CHAPTER 311 COPYRIGHT ACT. SUBSIDIARY LEGlSLA non. List o/subsidiary Legislation

Translation from Norwegian

Good Sources of International News on the Internet are: ABC News-

The National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) returned 444 persons in August 2018, and 154 of these were convicted offenders.

Global Prevalence of Adult Overweight & Obesity by Region

Country pairings for the first review cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption

2017 Social Progress Index

Income and Population Growth

FREEDOM OF THE PRESS 2008

REGIONAL INTEGRATION IN THE AMERICAS: THE IMPACT OF THE GLOBAL ECONOMIC CRISIS

Country pairings for the first cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption

Global Variations in Growth Ambitions

TAKING HAPPINESS SERIOUSLY

GUIDELINE OF COMMITTEES IN TASHKENT MODEL UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE 2019

STATUS OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PROHIBITION OF THE DEVELOPMENT, PRODUCTION, STOCKPILING AND USE OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS AND ON THEIR DESTRUCTION

UNITED NATIONS FINANCIAL PRESENTATION. UN Cash Position. 18 May 2007 (brought forward) Alicia Barcena Under Secretary-General for Management

Geoterm and Symbol Definition Sentence. consumption. developed country. developing country. gross domestic product (GDP) per capita

GLOBAL PRESS FREEDOM RANKINGS

Asia Pacific (19) EMEA (89) Americas (31) Nov

REPORT OF THE FOURTH SPECIAL SESSION OF THE CONFERENCE OF THE STATES PARTIES

AUSTRALIA S REFUGEE RESPONSE NOT THE MOST GENEROUS BUT IN TOP 25

MIGRATION IN SPAIN. "Facebook or face to face? A multicultural exploration of the positive and negative impacts of

Share of Countries over 1/3 Urbanized, by GDP per Capita (2012 $) 1960 and 2010

Country pairings for the first review cycle of the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption

My Voice Matters! Plain-language Guide on Inclusive Civic Engagement

VISA POLICY OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN

CAC/COSP/IRG/2018/CRP.9

Dashboard. Jun 1, May 30, 2011 Comparing to: Site. 79,209 Visits % Bounce Rate. 231,275 Pageviews. 00:03:20 Avg.

Financing of the United Nations peacekeeping forces in the Middle East: United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon

World Heritage UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION

Country Participation

Statistical Appendix 2 for Chapter 2 of World Happiness Report March 1, 2018

Trends in international higher education

Table of country-specific HIV/AIDS estimates and data, end 2001

Charting Cambodia s Economy, 1H 2017

Status of National Reports received for the United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development (Habitat III)

Rule of Law Index 2019 Insights

The National Police Immigration Service (NPIS) forcibly returned 375 persons in March 2018, and 136 of these were convicted offenders.

ASYLUM STATISTICS MONTHLY REPORT

CENTRAL AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN

2017 BWC Implementation Support Unit staff costs

The International Investment Index Report IIRC, Wuhan University

A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Contributions to UNHCR For Budget Year 2014 As at 31 December 2014

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index 2014

Middle School Level. Middle School Section I

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International Advanced Subsidiary and Advanced Level

TD/B/Inf.222. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Membership of UNCTAD and membership of the Trade and Development Board

Hilde C. Bjørnland. BI Norwegian Business School. Advisory Panel on Macroeconomic Models and Methods Oslo, 27 November 2018

INTERNATIONAL AIR SERVICES TRANSIT AGREEMENT SIGNED AT CHICAGO ON 7 DECEMBER 1944

... 00:00:00,06 Elapsed Time

Introduction to the 2013 Global Entrepreneurship and Development Index

PROTOCOL RELATING TO AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ARTICLE 45, SIGNED AT MONTREAL ON 14 JUNE parties.

CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX 2013.

CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX 2013.

CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX 2012.

PISA 2015 in Hong Kong Result Release Figures and Appendices Accompanying Press Release

REINVENTION WITH INTEGRITY

Proforma Cost for national UN Volunteers for UN Partner Agencies

Voluntary Scale of Contributions

INCOME AND EXIT TO ARGENTINA

Certificate of Free Sale Request Form

The World s Most Generous Countries

The Global Gender Gap Index 2015

GENTING DREAM IMMIGRATION & VISA REQUIREMENTS FOR THAILAND, MYANMAR & INDONESIA

INTERNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SALARY DIFFERENTIALS

Tourism Highlights International Tourist Arrivals, Average Length of Stay, Hotels Occupancy & Tourism Receipts Years

Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index 2013

Transcription:

World Peace Index Its Significance and Contribution to the Scientific Study of World Peace The 3 rd OECD WORLD FORUM October 29, 2009, BUSAN, KOREA Sang-Hyun Lee Acting Director, The World Peace Forum Senior Research Fellow, The Sejong Institute

Overview Background UNESCO and the Culture of Peace World Peace Index Project Methodology Conceptualization Structure of the Index World Peace Index 2009 Rankings and Main Features Policy Implications 2

WPI: Its Background Project Launched in 2000 Initiated in 2000 by Peace Forum of the Munhwa Ilbo Daily as a company project Collaborated with Presidential Commission for New Millennium and the Korea Commission for UNESCO World Peace Forum separated from Munhwa Ilbo, becoming an independent think tank in 2002 Goals of the Project Spread the paradigm of peace as a universal value Enhance public awareness of peace Alert the global community of the state of non-peace Stimulate a world-wide peace movement, and Promote peace studies and the level of peace throughout the world 3

UNESCO and the Culture of Peace Why Culture of Peace? Since wars begin in the minds of men, it is in the minds of men that the defences of peace must be constructed. Constitution of UNESCO, 1945, Preamble What is Culture of Peace? As defined by the United Nations, the Culture of Peace is a set of values, attitudes, modes of behaviour and ways of life that reject violence and prevent conflicts by tackling their root causes to solve problems through dialogue and negotiation among individuals, groups and nations (UN Resolutions A/RES/52/13 : Culture of Peace and A/RES/53/243, Declaration and Programme of Action on a Culture of Peace). 4

Measuring Peace: Similar Attempts Social, Economic Indicators Gini index (measure of inequality), Happiness index, Human Development Reports (UNDP), World Development Indicators (World Bank) and other general statistics International Politics Correlates of War, WEIS (World Events Interaction Survey), COPDAB (Conflict and Peace Data Bank), Freedom House index, Index of State Weakness Others Global Peace Index 5

Index of State Weakness 6

GPI and Index of State Weakness 7

Conceptualizing the Peace Negative vs. Positive Peace Peace is not simply a lack of war ; not a dichotomous value (i.e, peace-war) Peace at Different Levels of Society Macro/societal level: security would be the central element of peace Micro/individual level: safety of individuals Structure and Change in Peace Level Structural elements historical events Behavioral elements current events Peace at Three Different Social Dimensions Political peace freedom from fear Military/diplomatic freedom from violence and conflict Social/economic freedom from want, quality of life, security and safety 8

Constructing the Index A. Political Dimension B. Military/Diplomatic Dimension 1. Historical experiences of Domestic political conflict 1-1. Civil Wars 1-2. Political conflicts such as coup d etat or riots 1. Historical experiences of international conflict 1-1. Wars 1-2. Colonial experience 1-3. Geopolitical conditions C. Socio-Economic Dimension 1. Social safety and stability 1-1. Ecological and social safety 1-2. Personal stability 1-3. Social stability 2. Democracy and capacity of the state 2-1. Democratization 2-2. Human rights 2-3. Political transparency 3. Outstanding/ongoing domestic political conflicts 3-1. Civil wars 3-2. Political conflicts such as coup d etat or riots 3-3. Measures for democratization (Negotiation or agreement for resolution) 2. Militarization 2-1. Military expenditures 2-2. Armed forces 2-3. International treaties against weapons of mass destruction 3. International conflict 3-1. Wars 3-2. Use of force other than wars 3-3. Use of violence 3-4. Non-military violence 3-5. Establishing/breaking off diplomatic relations 2. Inequality and exclusion 2-1. Poverty and deficiency 2-2. Differences and inequalities 3. Qualify of life and social safety net 3-1. Quality of life 3-2. Social security 9

Operationalization and Measurement Variables and Coding Example Political dimension Historical experience of domestic political conflicts A1-1: Civil wars A11a frequency of civil wars in 1943~1972 (0: none, 1: once, 2: twice or more) A11b size of casualties from civil wars in 1943~1972 (0: less than 1/10,000 population, 1: 1/10,000 or more) A11c frequency of civil wars in 1973~2002 (0: none, 1: once, 2: twice or more) * (weighted twice) A11d - size of casualties from civil wars in 1973~2002 (0: less than 1/10,000 population, 1: 1/10,000 or more) * (weighted twice) A1-2: Coup d etat and other types of political conflicts A12 coup d etat and other types of political conflicts (0: none from 1943~2002, 1: occurred from 1943~1992, 2: occurred from 1993~2002) A1 = ((A11a+A11b)+(A11c+A11d)*2)+A12)/11 A01 = (1-A1)*100 greater values mean more peaceful historical experience 10

Operationalization and Measurement Calculating Composite Index Discrete measure for each individual variables Sum up and scale so that each categorical variables vary between 0 and 100 (positive values indicates more peaceful state) World Peace Index = (A 01 +A 02 +A 03 +B 01 +B 02 + B 03 +C 01 +C 02 +C 03 )/9. Political Peace Index = (A 01 +A 02 +A 03 )/3. Military/diplomatic Peace Index = (B 01 +B 02 +B 03 )/3. Social/Economic Peace Index = (C 01 +C 02 +C 03 )/3. 11

Data and Coding Principles Data Sources Correlates of War data set UNDP, Human Development Report World Bank, World Development Indicators Freedom House Survey of political freedom Corruption perception index Facts on File CIA, World Factbook Encyclopedia Britannica The Military Balance Major public media of the world Coding Reliability Cross-check among graduate student coders for inter-coder reliability Check on raw data for suspicious coding Extrapolation for missing values, using SPSS statistical analysis tool 12

WPI 2009 Rankings (76 Countries) Rank Nation WPI Rank Nation WPI Rank Nation WPI Rank Nation WPI 1 Sweden 90.7 20 Costa Rica 82.9 39 Croatia 76.9 58 Bangladesh 66.6 2 Denmark 90.3 21 Belgium 82.3 40 Malaysia 76.9 59 Thailand 66.5 3 Switzerland 89.5 22 Czech 82.2 41 Venezuela 75.9 60 Morocco 66.3 4 Netherlands 89.4 23 Japan 81.5 42 France 75.9 61 Israel 65.5 5 Germany 88.9 24 Chile 81.1 43 Argentina 75.8 62 Kenya 65.1 6 Austria 87.8 25 Brazil 80.4 44 South Africa 75.4 63 Egypt 63.8 8 Norway 87.8 26 United Kingdom 80.4 45 South Korea 75.3 64 Indonesia 62.4 7 Finland 87.8 27 Bulgaria 80.4 46 Kazakhstan 74.7 65 China 62.0 9 Canada 87.4 28 Jamaica 80.2 47 Ecuador 74.1 66 Turkey 60.9 10 Australia 87.1 29 Lithuania 79.1 48 Romania 73.8 67 Iran 60.3 11 New Zealand 86.7 30 Trinidad & Tobago 79.1 49 Russia 73.8 68 Philippines 59.2 12 Ireland 86.4 31 Ukraine 78.8 50 El Salvador 73.7 69 Colombia 58.8 13 Hungary 84.8 32 Spain 78.8 51 United States 73.0 70 Zimbabwe 57.2 14 Luxemburg 84.5 33 Italy 78.4 52 Nicaragua 72.8 71 Syria 55.6 15 Portugal 84.4 34 Singapore 78.1 53 Greece 72.4 72 Algeria 55.0 16 Poland 84.2 35 Albania 77.9 54 Bolivia 71.7 73 Nigeria 54.2 17 Slovenia 83.5 36 Mauritus 77.8 55 Belarus 71.4 74 Sri Lanka 53.6 18 Uruguay 83.1 37 Mexico 77.8 56 Peru 70.2 75 India 51.8 19 Panama 82.9 38 Tunisia 77.0 57 Jordan 68.1 76 Pakistan 45.7 13

WPI 2009: by Region and Income Category N WPI 2009 Political PI Military- Diplomatic PI Socio- Economic PI World Average 76 74.9 76.6 77.1 71.0 America 18 76.7 78.2 79.4 72.6 Europe 29 82.2 87.7 81.1 77.6 Region Sub-Saharan 5 66.0 63.9 79.5 54.5 Arab & North Africa 9 63.6 62.9 61.2 66.8 Asia-Pacific 15 68.5 65.8 75.5 64.3 High(Above $16,000) 30 82.6 90.3 79.9 77.7 Income Level Mid($3,000~15,999) 39 71.8 70.5 75.7 69.3 Low(Below $2,999 ) 7 59.1 51.8 73.3 52.1 (For 76 countries) 14

평화지수 세계평화지수 Trends in WPI, 2002~2009 그림1. 세계평화수준의변화 75 74.5 74 73.5 73 72.5 72 71.5 71 그림2. 영역별평화수준의변화 80 78 76 02 03 04 05 06 7407 08 09 연도 72 70 68 66 64 62 60 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 연도 정치 군사외교 사회경제 15

Military-Diplomatic Index (140 Countries) Rank Nation WPI Rank Nation WPI Rank Nation WPI Rank Nation WPI 1 Germany 91.15 21 Canada 83.32 101 Singapore 69.34 121 Lebanon 62.44 2 Japan 90.18 22 South Africa 83.22 102 South Korea 69.33 122 Angola 62.39 3 Zambia 89.72 23 Jamaica 82.94 103 Oman 69.22 123 India 62.31 4 Switzerland 88.93 24 Mauritus 82.92 104 Namibia 69.05 124 United States 61.91 5 Sweden 88.79 25 Iceland 82.87 105 Tanzania 68.92 125 Georgia 46.56 6 Denmark 87.75 26 Romania 82.44 106 Malawi 67.70 126 Armenia 56.88 7 Netherlands 87.71 27 Belgium 82.41 107 Qatar 66.91 127 Iran 58.81 8 Italy 87.07 28 Ireland 82.13 108 Thailand 66.82 128 Egypt 58.74 9 Guatemala 87.01 29 Indonesia 81.48 109 Chad 66.61 129 Russia 82.44 10 Austria 86.46 30 Norway 81.21 110 Kuwait 66.27 130 Myanmar 57.75 11 Poland 86.13 31 Mongolia 80.93 111 Gabon 65.50 131 Pakistan 57.73 12 Costa Rica 85.88 32 Nigeria 80.80 112 Libya 65.50 132 Azerbaijan 63.39 13 Panama 85.87 33 Venezuela 80.43 113 Ethiopia 65.04 133 Colombia 74.06 14 Australia 85.74 34 Sri Lanka 80.33 114 Saudi Arabia 64.88 134 Jordan 56.30 15 Nicaragua 84.61 35 Philippines 80.22 115 Uzbekistan 64.63 135 North Korea 46.98 16 Portugal 84.54 36 Bolivia 80.17 116 Uganda 64.55 136 United Arab Emirate 52.81 17 Hungary 84.51 37 Argentina 80.04 117 Sudan 63.92 137 Israel 52.76 18 New Zealand 84.45 38 Uruguay 79.97 118 Vietnam 57.66 138 Cambodia 46.31 19 Brazil 83.80 39 Lithuania 79.69 119 Burundi 63.03 139 Syria 43.87 20 Fiji 83.71 40 Czech 79.61 120 Morocco 62.80 140 Iraq 24.18 16

Conclusions and Implications Peace is Indivisible Not only military situations, but also socioeconomic conditions are important Holistic approach is necessary Global initiative is strongly required Importance of Geopolitical Location Being the population size and the per capita income being equal, Americas and European region tend to show higher level of peace Need to spread the benefits of globalization more evenly throughout the world 17

Conclusions and Implications (cont.) Growing Gaps Military-diplomatic PI and Socio-economic PI s are on the rise Political PI continues to decline Gaps between rich and poor regions are also growing What Should Be Done? Global efforts are essential because peace is indeed a global issue Sharing responsibility particularly those who have more resources 18

Thank you. Any comment or question? 19