UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION : : : : : : : : : :

Similar documents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:09-cv TWT Document 3 Filed 03/24/2009 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION. Plaintiffs, ) CIVIL ACTION FILE. v. ) NO.

Case 3:17-mc G Document 1 Filed 03/06/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv RAJ Document 36 Filed 07/21/17 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : : :

Case crm Document 3284 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv BB Document 42 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/18/2016 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv LY Document 43 Filed 09/17/18 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CURLING PLAINTIFFS S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:10-cv PLF Document 17 Filed 08/04/11 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

EEOC v. Oglethorpe University

AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

U.S. District Court Northern District of Georgia (Atlanta) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:00-cv RLV

Case 1:12-cv RPM Document 24 Filed 03/06/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-1164-WO-JEP

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. Plaintiff, Case No. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

mg Doc 49 Filed 11/15/16 Entered 11/15/16 17:30:11 Main Document Pg 1 of 6

Case 1:03-cv CAP Document 27 Filed 05/28/2003 Page 1 of 14 ORIGINAL

Part Description 1 3 pages 2 Brief 3 Exhibit 1997 Preclearance Letter

EEOC v. John Wieland Homes and Neighborhoods, Inc.

Case4:13-cv JSW Document112 Filed05/05/14 Page1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:03-cv CAP Document 34 Filed 06/17/2003 Page 1 of 14 ORIGINAL

U.S. District Court Northern District of Georgia (Atlanta) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:17-cv LMM

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV- COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv TCB-WSD-BBM Document 44 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 8

Case 9:18-cv DMM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/16/2018 Page 1 of 8

JOINT NOTICE REGARDING POTENTIAL SPECIAL MASTER. Pursuant to this Court s instructions on August 27, 2018, ECF 142 in 1:16-cv-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CASE NO.:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION

PlainSite. Legal Document. Georgia Northern District Court Case No. 1:10-cv D. H. Pace Company, Inc. v. Stephens et al.

Case 4:07-cv WLS Document 145 Filed 02/02/15 Page 1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv PKC-JO Document Filed 01/07/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: Plaintiffs, Defendants. STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT AND ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Come now the Hall County Board of Education (Local Board) and the State Board of

thejasminebrand.com thejasminebrand.com

Plaintiff, Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 1:03-cv CAP Document 57 Filed 08/21/2003 Page FILEn 1 ~p of CLERM 10 OFFICE. IN TIDE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT LU'f

Case 1:96-cv TFH-GMH Document 4315 Filed 12/22/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

U.S. District Court Northern District of Georgia (Atlanta) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:17-cv TWT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 3:12-cv Document 99 Filed in TXSD on 04/07/14 Page 1 of 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 3:04-cr JAH Document 309 Filed 01/17/13 PageID.1104 Page 1 of 6

Case 4:07-cv CW Document 39 Filed 12/07/2007 Page 1 of 5

Case 0:16-cv WPD Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/07/2017 Page 1 of 4

Case 3:15-cv RBL Document 12 Filed 03/26/15 Page 1 of 8

Case 4:82 cv DPM Document 4737 Filed 04/30/12 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case KJC Doc 166 Filed 04/16/19 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. 1:16-CV-1164-WO-JEP

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION. No. 5:09-CT D ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Transcription:

Case 102-cv-01686-TWT Document 745 Filed 11/09/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION KENNY A., by his next friend Linda Winn, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. NATHAN DEAL, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION 102-cv-1686-TWT JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF MODIFIED CONSENT DECREE AND EXIT PLAN Plaintiffs 1 and State Defendants 2 (collectively, the Parties ), by and through their undersigned counsel, jointly request modification of the Consent Decree [Dkt. 1 Kenny A., by his next friend Linda Winn, Kara B., by her next friend Linda Pace, Maya C., by her next friend Linda Pace, Phelicia D., by her next friend Theresa Roth, Sabrina E., by her next friend Rebecca Silvey, Korrina E., by her next friend Rebecca Silvey, Tanya F., by her next friend Carol Huff, Priscilla G., by her next friend Roslyn M. Satchel, and Briana H., by her next friend Linda Pace, on their own behalf and on behalf of all other similarly situated. 2 Nathan Deal, in his official capacity as Governor of Georgia, the Georgia Department of Human Resources, Robyn A. Crittenden, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Georgia Department of Human Services, Fulton County Department of Family and Children Services, Glenene Lanier, in her official capacity as County Director of Fulton Division of Family and Children Services, the DeKalb County Division of Family and Children Services, and Kimberly Mobley, in her official capacity as Acting County Director of DeKalb Division of Family and Children Services.

Case 102-cv-01686-TWT Document 745 Filed 11/09/16 Page 2 of 10 No. 488], as amended by the Joint Stipulation and Order to Modify the Consent Decree Regarding Reimbursement Rates for Placements [Dkt. No. 613], the Stipulated Modification of Consent Decree [Dkt. No. 687], and the Joint Stipulation and Order to Modify the Consent Decree Regarding Accountability and Monitoring [Dkt. No. 740] (hereinafter referred to as the 2015 Consent Decree ). If this motion is granted, the proposed Modified Consent Decree and Exit Plan (attached hereto as Exhibit A) will replace the 2015 Consent Decree in its entirety. Background Plaintiffs brought this class action lawsuit seeking declaratory and prospective injunctive relief based upon alleged violations of constitutional and statutory rights arising out of the operation of foster care systems in Fulton and DeKalb counties. On August 13, 2003, the Court certified a class consisting of [a]ll children who have been, are, or will be alleged or adjudicated deprived who (1) are or will be in custody of any [] State Defendants; and (2) have or will have an open case in Fulton County DFCS or DeKalb County DFCS. Dkt. No. 193. Prior to trial, the Parties negotiated a resolution embodied in the terms of the Consent Decree, which requires certain reforms to Fulton and DeKalb counties foster care systems and establishes specific benchmarks for progress. The original Consent Decree was entered on October 28, 2005. Since that time, as noted above, 2

Case 102-cv-01686-TWT Document 745 Filed 11/09/16 Page 3 of 10 the Court has approved modifications agreed to by the Parties. See Dkt. Nos. 612, 687, 740. Negotiations to Modify the Consent Decree In July 2015, Class counsel initiated discussions with State Defendants counsel aimed at modifying the 2015 Consent Decree to streamline obligations in recognition of progress, remaining challenges, and changes in best practice standards in foster care. The Parties discussed improving the outcome measures used to assess State Defendants performance and maximizing the technical assistance of the Accountability Agent, Karen Baynes-Dunning, and the Monitoring and Technical Assistance Team ( MTAT ). And a significant part of these discussions was the Parties effort to chart a course towards the termination of this Court s supervision over State Defendants administration of foster care in Fulton and DeKalb counties. Over the course of a year, State Defendants and Class counsel negotiated the proposed Modified Consent Decree and Exit Plan. With the Accountability Agent s assistance, the Parties exchanged a number of proposals and counterproposals, participated in several telephone conferences and in-person meetings, and called upon the expertise of the Accountability Agent and the MTAT to 3

Case 102-cv-01686-TWT Document 745 Filed 11/09/16 Page 4 of 10 provide and interpret data. After these extensive, arm s-length negotiations, the Parties have agreed to the proposed Modified Consent Decree and Exit Plan. Proposed Modified Consent Decree and Exit Plan The proposed Modified Consent Decree and Exit Plan modifies the 2015 Consent Decree in the following areas (1) placements, (2) visitation, (3) outcome measures, (4) process/infrastructure requirements, (5) terms upon which State Defendants demonstrate compliance with and may move for termination of the proposed Modified Consent Decree and Exit Plan, and (6) dispute resolution provisions. The modifications in each of these areas are summarized below. First, the proposed Modified Consent Decree and Exit Plan provides for additional mechanisms for oversight over the placement of children in certain situations. Specifically, State Defendants are required to notify the Accountability Agent if a child is placed in more than one temporary facility within one episode of foster care or remains in a temporary facility for more than 30 days. Similarly, if a child is in a county DFCS office between 800 p.m. and 800 a.m., State Defendants are obligated to report that event to the MTAT. In addition, the proposed Modified Consent Decree and Exit Plan incorporates State Defendants commitment to phase out the use of hotels as placements for children in foster care within DeKalb and Fulton counties by June 30, 2017. 4

Case 102-cv-01686-TWT Document 745 Filed 11/09/16 Page 5 of 10 Second, the proposed Modified Consent Decree and Exit Plan clarifies that face-to-face visits for children in all placements, except adoptive placements, must occur earlier in the placement in order to monitor and document the child s adjustment to the placement, the appropriateness of the placement to meet the child s needs, the receipt of appropriate treatment and services by the child, the child s safety, and service goals. Third, the proposed Modified Consent Decree and Exit Plan includes revised and improved outcome measures. Specifically, it replaces outdated outcome measures used to assess State Defendants performance regarding re-entry, maltreatment in care, discharge to permanency, and multiple placement moves. The new measures contained in the proposed Modified Consent Decree and Exit Plan will more appropriately reflect State Defendants performance in these areas. In addition, the proposed Modified Consent Decree and Exit Plan adjusts the sibling placement outcome measure to include exceptions based on safety, exceptional needs of a child, size of the sibling group, and placement of siblings with relatives. Moreover, the proposed Modified Consent Decree and Exit Plan changes the composite structure of an outcome measure tied to meeting children s service needs to separate and increased requirements for meeting children s medical, dental, mental health, and education/development needs. 5

Case 102-cv-01686-TWT Document 745 Filed 11/09/16 Page 6 of 10 Fourth, the proposed Modified Consent Decree and Exit Plan recognizes the need for improved process/infrastructure requirements, which are designed to measure the foundational elements of the child welfare system. It establishes a framework for the creation of new standards. Specifically, it requires the Accountability Agent and the MTAT to review current practice and recommend measurement changes, and allows the Parties to negotiate based on those recommendations. If the Parties are unable to agree upon any of the proffered recommendations, the Accountability Agent will issue a binding decision. Fifth, the proposed Modified Consent Decree and Exit Plan provides a revised mechanism for State Defendants to qualify for exit from the Court s supervision. The mechanism is based on classification of each outcome measure as attained or ongoing. Under the proposed Modified Consent Decree and Exit Plan, an outcome measure is initially designated as attained or ongoing depending on the measure of State Defendants performance in the reporting periods before entry of the proposed Modified Consent Decree and Exit Plan (if approved). Those initial designations may change depending on State Defendants performance. If State Defendants performance on a particular outcome measure designated as attained declines, the proposed Modified Consent Decree and Exit Plan empowers the 6

Case 102-cv-01686-TWT Document 745 Filed 11/09/16 Page 7 of 10 Accountability Agent, with the assistance of the MTAT, to assess the reason(s) and issue findings as to whether that outcome measure will be re-designated as ongoing. Likewise, if the State Defendants performance on a particular outcome measure designated as ongoing improves for one reporting period, and then complies with the performance target for the following two consecutive periods, that measure will be designated as attained. When all of the outcome measures are designated as attained, State Defendants may seek an order from this Court terminating the Modified Consent Decree and Exit Plan. Sixth, the proposed Modified Consent Decree and Exit Plan contains a revised dispute resolution process that seeks to resolve differences through negotiations by the Parties with the assistance of the Accountability Agent before raising an issue with the Court. Conclusion The Parties seek to address changes in best practices regarding process/infrastructure requirements and outcome measures in the 2015 Consent Decree, create a streamlined dispute resolution process, and outline the path for State Defendants to terminate this Court s supervision of foster care in Fulton and DeKalb counties. After a year of negotiation with the assistance of the 7

Case 102-cv-01686-TWT Document 745 Filed 11/09/16 Page 8 of 10 Accountability Agent, the Parties agree that the proposed Modified Consent Decree and Exit Plan will achieve these goals, protect the Class s interests, and further the purpose of the 2015 Modified Consent Decree. Therefore, the Parties respectfully request that the Court grant this Joint Motion for Entry of the Modified Consent Decree and Exit Plan. A proposed order is attached for the Court s consideration. Respectfully submitted, this 9th day of November, 2016. /s/ David G.H. Brackett DAVID G.H. BRACKETT Georgia Bar No. 068353 SAMIKA N. BOYD Georgia Bar No. 194093 BONDURANT MIXSON & ELMORE, LLP 1201 W. Peachtree St. N.W., Suite 3900 Atlanta, GA 30309 Phone (404) 881-4100 Fax (404) 881-4111 IRA P. LUSTBADER pro hac vice CHRISTINA W. REMLIN pro hac vice ELISSA GLUCKSMAN HYNE pro hac vice CHILDREN S RIGHTS 330 7th Ave., Fl. 4 New York, NY 10001 Phone (212) 683-2210 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS 8

Case 102-cv-01686-TWT Document 745 Filed 11/09/16 Page 9 of 10 JAIME L. THERIOT Georgia Bar No. 497652 TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP 5200 Bank of America Plaza 600 Peachtree St., N.E. Atlanta, GA 30308 Phone (404) 885-3534 SAMUEL S. OLENS Attorney General Georgia Bar No. 033887 DENNIS R. DUNN Deputy Attorney General Georgia Bar No. 234098 SHALEN S. NELSON Senior Assistant Attorney General Georgia Bar No. 636575 STATE LAW DEPARTMENT 40 Capitol Sq., S.W. Atlanta, GA 30334-1300 Phone (404) 656-3377 ATTORNEYS FOR STATE DEFENDANTS 9

Case 102-cv-01686-TWT Document 745 Filed 11/09/16 Page 10 of 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this date, I electronically filed the foregoing JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF MODIFIED CONSENT DECREE AND EXIT PLAN with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will automatically send email notification of such filing to all attorneys of record This 9th day of November, 2016. /s/ David G.H. Brackett DAVID G.H. BRACKETT