Submarine Cables & Pipelines under UNCLOS

Similar documents
Unit 3 (under construction) Law of the Sea

Federal Act relating to the Sea, 8 January 1986

Areas of Marine Jurisdiction Review & Update on the Legal Framework Influencing Submarine Telecommunications Marine Activities

Maritime Zones Act, 1999 (Act No. 2 of 1999) PART I PRELIMINARY

CHAPTER 100:01 MARITIME BOUNDARIES ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PART II

CONVENTION ON THE CONTINENTAL SHELF

TITLE 33. MARINE ZONES AND PROTECTION OF MAMMALS

Exclusive Economic Zone Act

Marine spaces Act, 1977, Act. No. 18 of 15 December 1977, as amended by the Marine Spaces (Amendment) Act 1978, Act No. 15 of 6 October 1978

TOF WHITE PAPER - SECTION re EXTENDED CONTINENTAL SHELF

The Maritime Areas Act, 1984 Act No. 3 of 30 August 1984

MARIE LOUISE COLEIRO PRECA President

CHAPTER 2. MARINE ZONES ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

Law of the Sea. CDR James Kraska, JAGC, USN Howard S. Levie Chair of Operational Law

Federal Law No. 19 of 1993 in respect of the delimitation of the maritime zones of the United Arab Emirates, 17 October 1993

UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA. Signed at Montego Bay, Jamaica, 10 December Entry into force: 16 November 1994

I. Is Military Survey a kind of Marine Scientific Research?

Possible ways to highlight to the international community the need for a new instrument regulating the laying and protection of submarine cables

Finland. (a) Act on the Exclusive Economic Zone of Finland 26 November

Law No. 28 (1) Chapter I Definitions

Centre for Oceans Law & Policy Global Challenges and Freedom of Navigation. Panel VI: Balancing Marine Environment and Freedom of Navigation

The Legal Regime of Maritime Areas and the Waning Freedom of the Seas

UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA

The Legal Status of the Outer Continental Shelf without a Recommendation from the CLCS UNIVERSITY OF SHIZUOKA SHIZUKA SAKAMAKI

A BILL FOR [SB. 240] [ ] Maritime Zones 2009 No. C 31. An Act to Repeal the Exclusive Economic Zone Act Cap. E17 LFN 2004 and the

UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA 1982 A COMMENTARY

Poland s view on the Nord Stream project

PCA PRESS RELEASE ARBITRATION BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA AND THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA

Maritime Areas Act of 1996

GUIDELINES FOR REGIONAL MARITIME COOPERATION

Marine Boundaries and Jurisdiction Act, , 25 February 1978 PART I PRELIMINARY

Game Changer in the Maritime Disputes

The Legal Regime Governing Passage on Routes used for International Navigation through Indonesian Waters. Robert Beckman

PART I PRELIMINARY. Short title, application and commencement.

This report is published and distributed by America s Survival, Inc. Cliff Kincaid, President

THE LEGAL REGIME OF STRAITS USED FOR INTERNATIONAL NAVIGATION

Environmental Protection in Archipelagic Waters and International Straits-The Role of the International Maritime Organisation

Geopolitics, International Law and the South China Sea

Oceans Act of 18 December 1996 (An Act respecting the oceans of Canada, 18 December 1996) TABLE OF PROVISIONS

TERRITORIAL SEA AND EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE 1977 No. 16 ANALYSIS

United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea

Responding to Illegal Foreign Fishing in Indonesian and Australian waters a comparative analysis PROFESSOR MELDA KAMIL ARIADNO AND ALISTAIR WYVILL SC

ANALYSIS. I. The Exclusive Economic Zone under International Law. A. Origins of the Exclusive Economic Zone

The Law of the Sea Convention

International Environmental Law JUS 5520

CONTINENTAL SHELF ACT

TREATY BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO AND GRENADA ON THE DELIMITATION OF MARINE AND SUBMARINE AREAS

Case 1:17-cv JEB Document 36-1 Filed 05/04/18 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Basics of International Law of the Sea

STATE S TERRITORY. Marta Statkiewicz Department of International and European Law Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics University of Wrocław

Which High Seas Freedoms Apply in the Exclusive Economic Zone? *

This document is downloaded from DR-NTU, Nanyang Technological University Library, Singapore.

1958 CONVENTION ON THE HIGH SEAS

CHAPTER 371 THE MARITIME ZONES ACT 1989

BELIZE MARITIME AREAS ACT CHAPTER 11 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000

Act No of 30 December 1968 relating to the exploration of the Continental Shelf and to the exploitation of its natural resources

The Territorial Sea and Exclusive Economic Zone Act, Act No. 30 of 23 October 1978, as amended by Act No. 19 of 1989

Submission to review of application of Migration Act to offshore resource workers. By the Australian Mines & Metals Association (AMMA)

Basic Maritime Zones. Scope. Maritime Zones. Internal Waters (UNCLOS Art. 8) Territorial Sea and Contiguous Zone

PART 1 - checklists Course breakdown

UNITED NATIONS HEADQUARTERS, NEW YORK SEPTEMBER 2002

FIFTH REGULAR SESSION, 2016 C.B. NO A BILL FOR AN ACT

Page 1. Arrangements of Sections PART I PRELIMINARY. 1. Short title and commencement. 2. Interpretation. PART II MARITIME AREAS OF BELIZE

Joint Marine Scientific Research in Intermediate/Provisional

Dr Fraser Cameron Director EU-Asia Centre, Brussels

The Evolving Balance Between Coastal State Rights and High Seas Freedoms: Current Developments and Future Prospects ABLOS Monaco, Oct.

Implementing UNCLOS: Legislative and Institutional Aspects at a National Level

Some legal aspects of the drilling rig incident in the South China Sea in

The High Seas and the International Seabed Area

83 CONTINENTAL SHELF ACT

INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THE LAW OF THE SEA. The Rule of Law in the Seas of Asia: Navigational Chart for the Peace and Stability

The Nomocracy Pursuit of the Maritime Silk Road On Legal Guarantee of State s Marine Rights and Interests

The Association of the Bar of the City of New York

Captain J. Ashley Roach, JAGC, USN (ret.) Office of the Legal Adviser U.S. Department of State (retired) Senior Visiting Scholar, CIL NUS ARF Seminar

SPC EU Deep Sea Minerals Project

UNCLOS III: Pollution Control in the Exclusive Economic Zone

MARITIME ZONES ACT CHAPTER 371 LAWS OF KENYA

DSM: international and national law. Hannah Lily Legal Advisor, Deep Sea Minerals Project, SPC (SOPAC Division) Rarotonga, 13 May 2014

Treaty on the Southeast Asia Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone (Bangkok Treaty)

Disputed Areas in the South China Sea

EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE ACT

PEACEFUL SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES IN OCEAN CONFLICTS: DOES UNCLOS III POINT THE WAY?

ASEAN & the South China Sea Disputes

Seminar on the Establishment of the Outer Limits of the Continental Shelf beyond 200 Nautical Miles under UNCLOS (Feb. 27, 2008)

Tara Davenport Research Fellow Centre for International Law

Convention for the Protection, Management and Development of the Marine and Coastal Environment of the East African Region, 1985.

TESTIMONY OF ADMIRAL ROBERT PAPP COMMANDANT, U.S. COAST GUARD ON ACCESSION TO THE 1982 LAW OF THE SEA CONVENTION

ASPECTS OF TRINIDADIAN MARINE BOUNDARY LEGISLATION

THE PHILIPPINE BASELINES LAW

Romania. ACT concerning the Legal Regime of the Internal Waters, the Territorial Sea and the Contiguous Zone of Romania, 7 August 1990 * CHAPTER I

International Law: Territories, Oceans, Airspace, and Outerspace

REGULATIONS RELATING TO FOREIGN MARINE SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN NORWAY S INTERNAL WATERS, TERRITORIAL SEA AND ECONOMIC ZONE AND ON THE CONTINENTAL SHELF

Yan YAN, National Institute for South China Sea Studies, China. Draft Paper --Not for citation and circulation

CRS Issue Brief for Congress

TITLE TO LAND... 5 OCCUPATION AND PRESCRIPTION... 5 Possession... 5 Administration... 5 Occupation or prescription?... 5 CONQUEST... 5 SECESSION...

Can the COC Establish a Framework for a Cooperative Mechanism in the South China Sea? Robert Beckman

Towards a Possible International Agreement on Marine Biodiversity in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction

Guidelines for Navigation and Overflight in the Exclusive Economic Zone

INTERNATIONAL TERRITORIAL DISPUTES AND CONFRONTATIONS IN THE SOUTH CHINA SEA FROM A LEGAL PERSPECTIVE

Prof T Ikeshima. LLB, LLM, DES, PhD. 03/06/2016 Session 1 (Ikeshima) 1

Transcription:

HIELC 2016 Bucerius Law School Hamburg 15 April 2016 Submarine Cables & Pipelines under UNCLOS Robert Beckman Director, Centre for International Law (CIL) National University of Singapore

Part 1 UNCLOS Provisions on Cables and Pipelines 2

Regulation of Cables under UNCLOS Rights of States to regulate cables and pipelines and obligation of States to protect cables depends upon where they are located: 1. Zones subject to sovereignty territorial sea and archipelagic waters 2. Zones outside sovereignty EEZ, continental shelf, high seas and deep seabed 3

LEGAL REGIMES OF THE OCEANS AND AIRSPACE 8/9/01 42

Cables & Pipelines in Territorial Sea Laying and Repair Coastal States have wide discretion to adopt laws on the laying and repair of cables and pipelines in territorial sea Protection Coastal States have the right to adopt laws to protect cables in territorial sea, including right to regulate ships exercising innocent passage Coastal States have no obligation to adopt laws and regulations to protect cables in the territorial sea 5

Cables & Pipelines on bed of High Seas The right to lay submarine cables and pipelines is a high seas freedom that may be exercised by all States [Art 87] The right to lay cables and pipelines must be exercised with due regard to the rights of other States, such as the freedom of navigation [Art 87(2)] When laying submarine cables, States shall have due regard to cables or pipelines already in position. In particular, possibilities of repairing existing cables or pipelines shall not be prejudiced. [Art 112, 79(5)] 6

Specific legal regime of EEZ EEZ is not under the sovereignty of coastal States and it is not part of the high seas EEZ is a Specific Legal Regime in which sets out: [Art 55] Rights, jurisdiction & duties of coastal States [Art 56] The rights and duties of other States [Art 58] Coastal States have the sovereign right to explore and exploit the natural resources, including the resources of the sea-bed and subsoil [Art 56] Other States have the right to exercise high seas freedoms including freedom of navigation and freedom to lay cables and pipelines [Art 58] 7

Article 56. Rights, Jurisdiction and Duties of the Coastal State in EEZ 1. In the exclusive economic zone, the coastal State has: (a) sovereign rights for the purpose of exploring and exploiting, conserving and managing the natural resources, whether living or nonliving, of the waters superjacent to the seabed and of the seabed and its subsoil, and with regard to other activities for the economic exploitation and exploration of the zone, such as the production of energy from the water, currents and winds;... 2. In exercising its rights and performing its duties under this Convention in the EEZ, the coastal State shall have due regard to the rights and duties of other States and shall act in a manner compatible with the provisions of this Convention. 3. The rights set out in this article with respect to the seabed and subsoil shall be exercised in accordance with Part VI. 8

Article 56. Rights, Jurisdiction and Duties of the Coastal State in EEZ 1. In the exclusive economic zone, the coastal State has: (b) jurisdiction as provided for in the relevant provisions of this Convention with regard to: (i) the establishment and use of artificial islands, installations and structures; (ii) marine scientific research; (iii) the protection and preservation of the marine environment; (c) other rights and duties provided for in this Convention. 9

Article 58. Rights and Duties of Other States in the EEZ 1. In the EEZ, all States, whether coastal or land-locked, enjoy, subject to the relevant provisions of this Convention, the freedoms referred to in article 87 of navigation and overflight and of the laying of submarine cables and pipelines, and other internationally lawful uses of the sea related to these freedoms, such as those associated with the operation of ships, aircraft and submarine cables and pipelines, and compatible with the other provisions of this Convention. 10

Article 58. Rights and Duties of Other States in the EEZ 3. In exercising their rights and performing their duties under this Convention in the EEZ, States shall have due regard to the rights and duties of the coastal State and shall comply with the laws and regulations adopted by the coastal State in accordance with the provisions of this Convention and other rules of international law in so far as they are not incompatible with this Part. 11

General Obligations to Protect & Preserve the Marine Environment Article 194. Measures to Prevent, Reduce and Control Pollution of the Marine Environment 1. States shall take, individually or jointly as appropriate, all measures consistent with this Convention that are necessary to prevent, reduce and control pollution of the marine environment from any source, using for this purpose the best practicable means at their disposal and in accordance with their capabilities, and they shall endeavour to harmonize their policies in this connection. 12

General Obligations to Protect & Preserve the Marine Environment Article 206. Assessment of Potential Effects of Activities When States have reasonable grounds for believing that planned activities under their jurisdiction or control may cause substantial pollution of or significant and harmful changes to the marine environment, they shall, as far as practicable, assess the potential effects of such activities on the marine environment and shall communicate reports of the results of such assessments in the manner provided in article 205. 13

Continental Shelf Regime The continental shelf comprises the seabed and subsoil of the submarine areas that extend beyond its territorial sea throughout the natural prolongation of its land territory to the outer edge of the continental margin, or to a distance of 200 nm [Art 76] Coastal States have sovereign rights for the purpose of exploring it and exploiting its natural resources [Art 77] The exercise of the rights of the coastal State over the continental shelf must not infringe or result in any unjustifiable interference with navigation and other rights and freedoms of other States as provided for in this Convention [Art 78] 14

1. All States are entitled to lay submarine cables and pipelines on the continental shelf, in accordance with the provisions of this article. 3. The delineation of the course for the laying of such pipelines on the continental shelf is subject to the consent of the coastal State. 5. When laying submarine cables or pipelines, States shall have due regard to cables or pipelines already in position. In particular, possibilities of repairing existing cables or pipelines shall not be prejudiced. 15

Article 79. Cables & Pipelines on the Continental Shelf 2. Subject to its right to take reasonable measures for the exploration of the continental shelf, the exploitation of its natural resources and the prevention, reduction and control of pollution from pipelines, the coastal State may not impede the laying or maintenance of such cables or pipelines. 16

Article 79. Cables & Pipelines on the Continental Shelf 4. Nothing in this Part affects the right of the coastal State to establish conditions for cables or pipelines entering its territory or territorial sea, or its jurisdiction over cables and pipelines constructed or used in connection with the exploration of its continental shelf or exploitation of its resources or the operations of artificial islands, installations and structures under its jurisdiction. 17

Limits on freedom to lay cables & pipelines in EEZ The obligation in Part V to give due regard to the rights and duties of coastal States in the EEZ, including right to manage & conserve fisheries right to exploit hydrocarbon resources right to use energy from winds & waves right to consent to marine scientific research 18

Cables & Pipelines in ABNJ Article 112. Right to Lay Submarine Cables and Pipelines 1. All States are entitled to lay submarine cables and pipelines on the bed of the high seas beyond the continental shelf. 2. Article 79, paragraph 5, applies to such cables and pipelines. 19

Pipelines in The Area Article 145 provides that the International Seabed Authority shall adopt appropriate rules, regulations and procedures to prevent for the prevention, reduction and control of pollution and other hazards to the marine environment,..., particular attention being paid to the need for protection from harmful effects of such activities as drilling, dredging, excavation, disposal of waste, construction and operation or maintenance of installations, pipelines and other devices related to such activities. 20

Part 2 Problems with the UNCLOS provisions on cables and pipelines 21

States have rights under UNCLOS, not Companies STATES have right to lay cables and pipelines, but they are in fact laid by private companies or consortiums of private companies Is no flag State responsible for laying of cables and pipelines outside of territorial sovereignty of coastal States No State to exercise diplomatic protection if coastal States exceed their powers to regulate 22

Dispute Settlement Regime General rule is that any dispute between two States Parties on the interpretation or application of the provisions of the Convention that cannot be resolved by negotiation, may at the request of either party to the dispute, be submitted to the compulsory procedures entailing a binding decision by an international court of arbitral tribunal This includes the provisions on the freedom to lay cables and pipelines and the jurisdiction of coastal states to regulate pipelines 23

Article 297 on Dispute Settlement 1. Disputes concerning the interpretation or application of this Convention with regard to the exercise by a coastal State of its sovereign rights or jurisdiction provided for in this Convention shall be subject to the procedures provided for in section 2 in the following cases: (a) when it is alleged that a coastal State has acted in contravention of the provisions of this Convention in regard to the freedoms and rights of navigation, overflight or the laying of submarine cables and pipelines, or in regard to other internationally lawful uses of the sea specified in article 58; 24

Part 3 Gaps in International Legal Regime 25

No Global Conventions There are no global conventions to supplement UNCLOS on the regulation of pipelines Article 208 of UNCLOS calls for the international community to develop an international convention to govern seabed activities subject to national jurisdiction but no steps have been taken to draft such a convention Even the IMO Guidelines on the removal of disused platforms and installations is silent on the removal of pipelines associated with the the platforms and installations 26

Article 208. Pollution from Seabed Activities Subject to National Jurisdiction 1 Coastal States shall adopt laws and regulations to prevent, reduce and control pollution of the marine environment arising from or in connection with seabed activities subject to their jurisdiction and from artificial islands, installations and structures under their jurisdiction, pursuant to articles 60 and 80. 2. States shall take other measures as may be necessary to prevent, reduce and control such pollution. 4. States shall endeavour to harmonize their policies in this connection at the appropriate regional level. 27

Article 208. Pollution from Seabed Activities Subject to National Jurisdiction 3. Such laws, regulations and measures shall be no less effective than international rules, standards and recommended practices and procedures. 5. States, acting especially through competent international organizations or diplomatic conference, shall establish global and regional rules, standards and recommended practices and procedures to prevent, reduce and control pollution of the marine environment referred to in paragraph l. Such rules, standards and recommended practices and procedures shall be re-examined from time to time as necessary. 28

Regional Treaties Helsinki Convention applies to the whole of the Baltic area Includes internal waters, territorial sea and EEZ The Nord Stream gas pipeline passes transits 5 Baltic States, from Russia to Germany via the continental shelves of Finland, Sweden and Denmark But scholars have commented that the Convention does not provide for the holistic regulation of the construction operation and decommissioning of pipelines traversing the shelves of the Baltic States covers pipelines directly connected or associated with exploration and exploitation of the offshore energy resources 29

Thanks for Your Attention Robert Beckman Director, Centre for International Law (CIL) National University of Singapore Email: CILDIR@NUS.EDU.SG Website: WWW.CIL.NUS.EDU.SG 30