Case 9:10-cv RC Document 1 Filed 09/02/10 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Similar documents
Case 9:10-cv RC Document 1 Filed 09/02/10 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Case 2:11-cv ECR -PAL Document 1 Filed 02/25/11 Page 1 of 6

Case 6:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/05/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-50

Case 2:08-cv DF-CE Document 1 Filed 03/04/2008 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 05/29/15 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/11/17 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No: COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 6:10-cv LED Document 1 Filed 08/04/10 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/12/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/21/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Civil Action No: HON. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:99-mc Document 667 Filed 08/07/12 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:12-cv RC Document 1 Filed 07/13/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 3:17-cv M Document 1 Filed 07/26/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1

Case 1:10-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 09/01/10 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 1:10-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 09/01/10 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CIVIL CASE NO.

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 11/30/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 2:09-cv CE Document 1 Filed 12/22/09 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:17-cv RGS Document 1 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 07/26/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) Plaintiff,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Case 2:13-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 12/10/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv GMS Document 1 Filed 10/25/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 30 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Courthouse News Service

Case 1:17-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 7:15-cv DAE Document 68 Filed 07/18/17 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND DIVISION

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 06/22/10 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 1:18-cv RM Document 1 Filed 04/30/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

2:12-cv AJT-MAR Doc # 1 Filed 07/12/12 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case 1:15-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:13-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 01/21/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 06/19/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/06/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/08/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:17-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 03/08/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case 2:15-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 02/18/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/15/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

Case 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 09/26/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Case 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 2:17-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 04/13/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT

Case 2:10-cv TJW-CE Document 1 Filed 05/19/10 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:18-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 04/24/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:16-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

Case 2:17-cv JRG Document 15 Filed 12/19/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 77

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 123 Filed 03/09/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 842

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:13-cv GMS Document 23 Filed 03/12/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 117 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ) ) )

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Transcription:

Case 9:10-cv-00119-RC Document 1 Filed 09/02/10 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION LUNAREYE, INC. Plaintiff, vs. ENFORA INC., Case No. 9:10-cv-119 GUARDIAN GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES INC., GLOBALSTAR, INC., GUIDEPOINT SYSTEMS LLC, Jury Demanded HUGHES TELEMATICS INC., PORTMAN SECURITY SYSTEMS (USA) CO., LTD., PROCON, INC., SPOT LLC, XIRGO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, and ZOOMBAK LLC Defendants. PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL COMES NOW, LUNAREYE, INC. (hereinafter Plaintiff or LunarEye ), complaining of ENFORA, INC., GLOBALSTAR, INC., GUARDIAN GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., GUIDEPOINT SYSTEMS, LLC, HUGHES TELEMATICS, INC., PORTMAN SECURITY SYSTEMS (USA) CO., LTD., PROCON, INC., SPOT, LLC, XIRGO TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, and ZOOMBAK, LLC, collectively referred to as Defendants, and for cause of action would respectfully show the following:

Case 9:10-cv-00119-RC Document 1 Filed 09/02/10 Page 2 of 11 THE PARTIES 1. Plaintiff is a Texas corporation with its principal place of business in Liberty County, Texas. 2. Upon information and belief, Defendant Enfora, Inc. (hereinafter Enfora ), is a Texas corporation with a principal place of business at 251 Renner Pkwy Richardson, TX 75080. Enfora may be served by serving its Registered Agent, Mark A. Weinzierl, 661 18 th St., Plano, TX 75074-5693. 3. Upon information and belief, Defendant Globalstar, Inc. (hereinafter Globalstar ), is a Delaware corporation with a principal place of business at 461 S. Milpitas Blvd., Bldg. 5, Suites 1-2, Milpitas, California 95035. Globalstar may be served by serving its Registered Agent, Corporation Service Company, 2711 Centerville Road, Suite 400, Wilmington, DE 19808. 4. Upon information and belief, Defendant Guardian Global Technologies, Inc. (hereinafter Guardian ), is a California corporation with a principal place of business 635 W. Colorado Street, Ste 200, Glendale, CA 91204-1138. Guardian may be served by serving its Registered Agent, Mark Wilson, 4047 Costado Road, Pebble Beach, CA 93953-3004. 5. Upon information and belief, Defendant GuidePoint Systems LLC (hereinafter GuidePoint ), is a Michigan corporation with a principal place of business at 25307 Dequindre Road, Madison Heights, MI 48071. GuidePoint may be served by serving its Registered Agent, Rand W. Mueller, 24307 Dequindre, Madison Heights, MI 48071 6. Upon information and belief, Defendant Hughes Telematics, Inc. (hereinafter Hughes ) is a Delaware corporation with a principal place of business at 2002 Summit Blvd, 2

Case 9:10-cv-00119-RC Document 1 Filed 09/02/10 Page 3 of 11 Suite 1800, Atlanta, Georgia 30319. Hughes may be served by serving its Registered Agent, Corporation Service Company, 2711 Centerville Road, Suite 400, Wilmington, DE 19808. 7. Upon information and belief, Defendant Portman Security System (USA) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter Portman ), is a Massachusetts corporation with a principal place of business at 510 Turnpike St., Suite 204, North Andover, Ma. 01845. Portman may be served by serving its President, Susan Chu at 34 Andover Country Club Lane, Andover, MA 01810-2869. 8. Upon information and belief, Defendant Procon, Inc. (hereinafter Procon ) is a Tennessee corporation with a principal place of business at 2035 Lakeside Centre Way, Suite 125, Knoxville, TN 37922. Procon may be served by serving its Registered Agent, William E. McClamroch, III., 900 South Gay Street, Knoxville, TN 37902-1810. 9. Upon information and belief, Defendant Spot, LLC (hereinafter Spot ), is a Colorado corporation with a principal place of business at 461 S. Milpitas Blvd., Milpitas, CA 95035. Spot may be served by serving its Registered Agent, TCS Corporate Services, Inc., 800 Brazos Street, Ste. 400, Austin, TX 78701-2548. 10. Upon information and belief, Defendant Xirgo Technologies, LLC (hereinafter Xirgo ), is a Delaware corporation with a principal place of business at 425 Constitution Ave., Camarillo, CA 93012. Xirgo may be served by serving its Registered Agent, The Corporation Trust Company, Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, DE 19801. 11. Upon information and belief, Defendant Zoombak, LLC (hereinafter Zoombak ), is a Delaware corporation with a principal place of business at 909 Third Avenue, 28 th Floor, New York, NY 10022. Zoombak may be served by serving its Registered Agent, Corporation Service Company, 2711 Centerville Road, Suite 400, Wilmington, DE 19808. 3

Case 9:10-cv-00119-RC Document 1 Filed 09/02/10 Page 4 of 11 THE PATENT 12. On November 19, 2002, United States Patent No. U.S. Patent No. 6,484,035, entitled APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR TRIGGERABLE LOCATION REPORTING ( the 035 patent ) was duly and legally issued. A true and correct copy of the 035 patent is attached as Exhibit A. 13. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 282, the 035 patent is presumed valid. 14. LunarEye is the owner by assignment of the 035 patent with full and exclusive right to bring suit to enforce this patent. 15. The 035 patent relates generally to a triggerable location-reporting apparatus comprising: (a) a location-signal generating device configured to produce a location signal including location data when enabled; (b) a data selecting device for selecting less than all of the location data to include in the location signal; (c) a telemetry transmitter coupled to the data selecting device configured to transmit the location signal when enabled; (d) an enable controller configured to enable the location-signal generating device and the telemetry transmitter when it receives a trigger signal to then disable it; and (e) wherein the data selecting device reorders the selected data location. 16. The patent infringement allegations in this case relate to claims 3 and 4 of the 035 patent. 17. Claim 3 of the 035 Patent has been previously construed by this Court, and the Court s Memorandum Opinion and Order Construing Claim Terms of United States Patent No. 6,484,035 (the Claim Construction Opinion ) is attached hereto as Exhibit B. 4

Case 9:10-cv-00119-RC Document 1 Filed 09/02/10 Page 5 of 11 JURISDICTION & VENUE 18. This action arises under the patent laws of the United States, Title 35 United States Code, particularly 271 and 281. This Court has jurisdiction over the claim for patent infringement under 28 U.S.C. 1338(a). Venue is proper in this Court under Title 28 United States Code 1391(b) and (c) and 1400(b). 19. Enfora, upon information and belief, transacts business in this district by using, 20. Globalstar, upon information and belief, transacts business in this district by using, 21. Guardian, upon information and belief, transacts business in this district by using, 22. GuidePoint, upon information and belief, transacts business in this district by using, 5

Case 9:10-cv-00119-RC Document 1 Filed 09/02/10 Page 6 of 11 23. Hughes, upon information and belief, transacts business in this district by using, 24. Portman, upon information and belief, transacts business in this district by using, 25. Procon, upon information and belief, transacts business in this district by using, 26. Spot, upon information and belief, transacts business in this district by using, 27. Xirgo, upon information and belief, transacts business in this district by using, 28. Zoombak, upon information and belief, transacts business in this district by using, 6

Case 9:10-cv-00119-RC Document 1 Filed 09/02/10 Page 7 of 11 PATENT INFRINGEMENT COUNTS 29. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 20. 30. Enfora, on information and belief, makes, uses, sells, or offers to sell products that infringe claims of the 035 patent, including at least claims 3 and/or 4, or other claims, including for example and without limitation the Enfora GSM/GPRS MT-G Automated Vehicle Locating (AVL) device, the Enfora Spider MT, AT, SA and Mini MT lines of products, as well as any other Enfora devices that are triggerable location-reporting apparatuses as described and claimed in the 035 patent. 31. Globalstar, on information and belief, makes, uses, sells, or offers to sell products including for example and without limitation products manufactured under the Axonn tradename including the Axonn SMARTONE, AX Tracker STX2, and AX Tracker MMT location tracking devices, as well as any other Globalstar devices that are triggerable location-reporting apparatuses as described and claimed in the 035 patent. 32. Guardian, on information and belief, makes, uses, sells, or offers to sell products including for example and without limitation the Guardian Phantom Tracking device, as well as any other Guardian devices that are triggerable location-reporting apparatuses as described and claimed in the 035 patent. 7

Case 9:10-cv-00119-RC Document 1 Filed 09/02/10 Page 8 of 11 33. GuidePoint, on information and belief, makes, uses, sells, or offers to sell products that infringe claims of the 035 patent, including at least claims 3 and/or 4, or other claims, including for example and without limitation the GuidePoint GPS-SVL, the GuidePoint Stolen Motorcycle Locator, the GuidePoint Xtreme, and the GuidePoint ETA location tracking devices, as well as any other GuidePoint devices that are triggerable location-reporting apparatuses as described and claimed in the 035 patent. 34. Hughes, on information and belief, makes, uses, sells, or offers to sell products including for example and without limitation the Hughes Cocero line, the Hughes in-drive line, and the Hughes Network fleet location tracking devices, as well as any other Hughes devices that are triggerable location-reporting apparatuses as described and claimed in the 035 patent. 35. Portman, on information and belief, makes, uses, sells, or offers to sell products including for example and without limitation the Portman GT3000, GT3620, GT5000, CT6000-3G, GST8000, CTS100, GT2000NP, GT2000 Pet Tracker and GT2100 location tracking devices, as well as any other Portman devices that are triggerable location-reporting apparatuses as described and claimed in the 035 patent. 36. Procon, on information and belief, makes, uses, sells, or offers to sell products including for example and without limitation the GT3000GT series of GPS Trackers, the SAT Track GPS, the SAT Track Fleet GPS, the Rental Star GPS and Goldstar GPS location tracking 8

Case 9:10-cv-00119-RC Document 1 Filed 09/02/10 Page 9 of 11 devices, as well as any other Procon devices that are triggerable location-reporting apparatuses as described and claimed in the 035 patent. 37. Spot, on information and belief, makes, uses, sells, or offers to sell products that infringe claims of the 035 patent, including at least claims 3 and/or 4, or other claims, including for example and without limitation the Spot Satellite Personal Tracker location tracking devices, as well as any other Spot devices that are triggerable location-reporting apparatuses as described and claimed in the 035 patent. 38. Xirgo, on information and belief, makes, uses, sells, or offers to sell products that infringe claims of the 035 patent, including at least claims 3 and/or 4, or other claims, including for example and without limitation the Xirgo XT1900, XT2000, XT2000-O, XT2000, and XT4000 location tracking devices, as well as any other Xirgo devices that are triggerable location-reporting apparatuses as described and claimed in the 035 patent. 39. Zoombak, on information and belief, makes, uses, sells, or offers to sell products including for example and without limitation the Zoombak Car & Family A-GPS Locator location tracking devices, the A-GPS Universal Locator, the A-GPS Dog Locator, as well as any other Zoombak devices that are triggerable location-reporting apparatuses as described and claimed in the 035 patent. 40. The infringement of the 035 patent alleged above has injured Plaintiff and thus, it is entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate for Defendants infringement, which in no event can be less than a reasonable royalty. 9

Case 9:10-cv-00119-RC Document 1 Filed 09/02/10 Page 10 of 11 PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for entry of judgment: A. That Defendants, Globalstar, Enfora, Guardian, GuidePoint, Hughes, Portman, Procon, Spot, Xirgo, Zoombak and have infringed one or more claims of the 035 patent; B. That Defendants, Globalstar, Enfora, Guardian, GuidePoint, Hughes, Portman, Procon, Spot, Xirgo, Zoombak account for and pay to Plaintiff all damages caused by the infringement of the 035 patent, which by statute can be no less than a reasonable royalty; C. That Plaintiff be granted pre-judgment and post-judgment interest on the damages caused to it by reason of Defendants Globalstar, Enfora, Guardian, GuidePoint, Hughes, Portman, Procon, Spot, Xirgo, Zoombak s infringement of the 035 patent; D. That Plaintiff be granted its attorneys fees in this action; E. That costs be awarded to Plaintiff; AND F. That Plaintiff be granted such other and further relief that is just and proper under the circumstances. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff demands a jury trial on all claims and issues so triable. Dated: September 2, 2010 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Edward W. Goldstein Edward W. Goldstein Texas Bar No. 08099500 Christopher M. Faucett Texas Bar No. 00795198 Goldstein, Faucett & Prebeg, L.L.P. 1177 West Loop South, Suite 400 Houston, TX 77027 10

Case 9:10-cv-00119-RC Document 1 Filed 09/02/10 Page 11 of 11 Tel: 713-877-1515 Fax: 713-877-1737 Email: egoldstein@gfpiplaw.com Email: cfaucett@gfpiplaw.com Edwin Armistead Easterby Texas Bar No. 00796500 Williams Kherkher Law Firm 8441 Gulf Freeway, Suite 600 Houston, TX 77017 Tel: 713-249-2189 Fax: 713-643-6226 Email: aeasterby@williamskherkher.com ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF 11