FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION

Similar documents
FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION

The California Civic Engagement Project Issue Brief

HMO PLANS Anthem Select $ $1, $1,541.23

RURAL CAUCUS BY-LAWS California Democratic Party State Central Committee

Mr. John Mott-Smith Chief, Elections Division Secretary of State th Street, Sixth Floor Sacramento, CA Dear Mr.

The California Civic Engagement Project Issue Brief

JUSTICE BY GEOGRAPHY: DO POLITICS INFLUENCE THE PROSECUTION OF YOUTH AS ADULTS?

Legislative Policy Study. Can California County Jails Absorb Low-Level State Prisoners?

Three Strikes Analysis: Urban vs. Rur al Counties

1: HOW DID YOUTH VOTER TURNOUT DIFFER FROM THE REST OF THE 2012 ELECTORATE?

State 4-H Council Bylaws Adopted 10/23/2010 R = Required O = Optional

Impact of Realignment on County Jail Populations

25% Percent of General Voters 20% 15% 10%

-- DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES NEW ALL COUNTY LETTERS

VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA, INC. CALIFORNIA STATE COUNCIL CONSTITUTION

1. Summary of the FY coordinated claim for Sonoma County Transit Services dated April, 28, 2009 marked Exhibit A and attached hereto;

County Structure & Powers

Constitution of the California State Division International Association for Identification as amended through May 2, 2018 Las Vegas, Nevada

County-by- County Data

TABLE OF CONTENTS RECOMMENDATIONS... 6 CONCLUSION... 7

VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA, INC. CALIFORNIA STATE COUNCIL CONSTITUTION

Rules Committee Report Anaheim, California Saturday, October 21, 2017

California Public Defender Websites

PART I Introduction to Civil Litigation for the Paralegal

CALIFORNIA S 58 CRIME RATES: REALIGNMENT AND CRIME IN 2012

SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER S USE DEED OF TRUST WITH ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS

California State Senators

Enactment Of Tax Measures By Legislature

REGIONS SECTION 15 ACSA POLICIES & PROCEDURES

Agricultural Workers--Collective Bargaining Rights And Secondary Boycott Prohibition

Contents APA CALIFORNIA BYLAWS

CALIFORNIA COUNTY, CITY AND SCHOOL DISTRICT ELECTION OUTCOMES. County Offices and Ballot Measures

Criminal Justice Realignment:

These are the highlights of the latest Field Poll completed among a random sample of 997 California registered voters.

BYLAWS ARTICLE I OFFICES ARTICLE II MEMBERS

USA WEIGHTLIFTING, INCORPORATED PACIFIC WEIGHTLIFTING ASSOCIATION

State Employee Salaries

01/19/2018. Attorneys for Plaintiffs SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Appendix A. Humboldt County Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) Membership Roster Humboldt County AB 109 Implementation Progress Report

BYLAWS DEPOSITION REPORTERS ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA, INC. A California Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation

Report on Arrests for Driving Under the Influence in California, 1997

SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT

Proposed gas tax repeal backed five to four. Support tied to voter views about the state s high gas prices rather than the condition of its roads

PREPARED FOR: Breaking ICE s Hold. Presented by: Angela Chan Senior Staff Attorney and Policy Director Advancing Justice Asian Law Caucus

How Proposed Changes to the Public Charge Rule Will Affect Health, Hunger and the Economy in California

I A I N S T I T U T E O F T E C H N O L O G Y C A LI F O R N

Califor nia Migration: A Comparative Analysis CALIFORNIA. A Comparative Analysis NEXT 10

California Court Reporters Association Bylaws (Adopted October 4, 2017)

Release #2337 Release Date and Time: 6:00 a.m., Friday, June 4, 2010

California Counts. California s Newest Immigrants. Summary. Public Policy Institute of California POPULATION TRENDS AND PROFILES

AGENDA ITEM 9A. MEETING: July 18, 2018

2013 UCLA Asian American Studies Center. All rights reserved. Asian American Studies Center Bridging Research with Community

Release #2345 Release Date: Tuesday, July 13, 2010

FBI NATIONAL ACADEMY ASSOCIATES, INC., CALIFORNIA CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE BOARD PROTOCOL AND POLICIES

California Counts. A State of Diversity Demographic Trends in California s Regions. Summary. Public Policy Institute of California

Legislative Policy Study. Proposition 19: Did Failure Build Larger Success?

Marijuana. Use And Possession.

THE FIELD POLL. UCB Contact

California Republican Party

SYSTEMWIDE OFFICE of the EDUCATION ABROAD PROGRAM (UCEAP) 2011 Brazil Student Visa Information: PUC-Rio de Janeiro Programs

PPIC Statewide Survey:

USA WEIGHTLIFTING, INCORPORATED) PACIFIC WEIGHTLIFTING ASSOCIATION CONSTITUTION OF THE PACIFIC WEIGHTLIFTING ASSOCIATION (A MEMBER OF

California Civic Engagement Project

INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING A COMPLAINT BY A PRISONER UNDER CIVIL RIGHTS STATUTE 42 U.S.C. 1983

Disparities in California s Uncounted Vote-by-Mail Ballots: Youth, Language Preference and Military Status

Integration Potential of California s Immigrants and Their Children

DRAFT BYLAWS for Caucus Comments of the CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC PARTY STATE CENTRAL COMMITTEE VETERANS CAUCUS ARTICLE I NAME

COUNTYWIDE RDA OVERSIGHT BOARD SPECIAL DISTRICT APPOINTMENTS

Release #2486 Release Date: Friday, September 12, 2014

THE FIELD POLL. UCB Contact

POLL DATA HIGHLIGHTS SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN REGISTERED DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS.

County of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report

Marquette Law School Poll --- February 18-21, 2016

Resolutions Committee Report Anaheim, CA Saturday, October 21, 2017

INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING A COMPLAINT IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BY A PRISONER:

Two-to-one voter support for Marijuana Legalization (Prop. 64) and Gun Control (Prop. 63) initiatives.

NBC News/WSJ/Marist Poll Iowa September 20, 2012 Presidential Election Questionnaire

Marquette Law School Poll March 24-28, 2016

MCLAUGHLIN & ASSOCIATES NATIONAL OMNIBUS March 23, 2016

California Xegi$Lature PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE STATE SENATE

COUNTYWIDE RDA OVERSIGHT BOARD SPECIAL DISTRICT APPOINTMENTS

Criminal Appeals in California

BYLAWS CALIFORNIA CHAPTER 1, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS. (a California nonprofit mutual benefit corporation) ARTICLE I. General Provisions

Health Coverage and Care for Undocumented Immigrants

HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY POLL MEMO RELEASE 9/24/2018 (UPDATE)

CALIFORNIA ELECTIONS DATA ARCHIVE INTRODUCTION

Release #2475 Release Date: Wednesday, July 2, 2014 WHILE CALIFORNIANS ARE DISSATISFIED

Health Policy Research Brief

THE STATE OF THE UNIONS IN 2007: A PROFILE OF UNION MEMBERSHIP IN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA AND THE NATION 1

Loras College Statewide Wisconsin Survey October/November 2016

HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY POLL MEMO RELEASE 2/15/2018 (UPDATE)

Bylaws of the California Association of Resource Conservation Districts

California Frequently Asked Questions TABLE OF CONTENTS

NBC News/WSJ/Marist Poll. April New York Questionnaire

Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax

THE STATE OF THE UNIONS IN 2009: A PROFILE OF UNION MEMBERSHIP IN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA AND THE NATION 1

Frequently Asked Questions Last updated December 7, 2017

CALIFORNIA NARCOTIC OFFICERS ASSOCIATION B Y L A W S

BYLAWS LOCAL UNION NO INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD ELECTRICAL WORKERS VACAVILLE, CALIFORNIA. APPROVED: January 30, 2015

THE FIELD POLL. UCB Contact

Transcription:

FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION FOUNDED IN 1945 BY MERVIN FIELD 61 California Street San Francisco, California 9418 415-392-5763 Tabulations From a Field Poll Survey of Californians Likely to Vote in the June 216 Democratic Primary about the Presidential Election - prepared for the - Sacramento Bee and Capitol Alert April 8, 216 1

Introduction This volume presents the statistical data developed from a Field Poll survey in California conducted among 1,4 registered voters, including 584 voters considered likely to vote in the state s June Democratic presidential primary. NOTE: The statewide sample was augmented among Democrats and Party Preference registrants to increase the number of interviews conducted among likely voters in the state s Democratic presidential primary. Interviews were administered by telephone in English and Spanish using live interviewers calling from the Davis Research central location call center in Calabasas during the period March 24, 215 April 4, 216. Sampling Individual voters were sample at random from listings derived from the statewide voter registration rolls. Once a voter s name and telephone had been selected, interviews are attempted only with the specified voter. Interviews can be conducted on either the voter s landline or cell phone, depending on the source of the telephone listing from the voter file and the preference of the voter. In this survey about two-thirds of all the interviews (63%) were completed with voters on their cell phones, while 37% were completed on a landline or other type of phone. Prior to the start of data collection, professionally-trained telephone interviewers were briefed with regard to the survey s proper calling and interviewing procedures by the Study Director. This session provided both interviewers and supervisors with an overview of the study and includes a question-by-question review of all items in the survey. Interviewers then completed survey interviews by telephone through the computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) system. CATI controls the telephone scripts read to individual respondents by displaying the appropriate questionnaire items and their valid response code alternatives in their proper sequence on computer screens at each interviewer's booth. The interviewer then reads each question aloud to the respondent from the screen and enters each respondent's pre-coded answer category through the keyboard directly to a computer disk. All answers are automatically stored in computer memory. In order to bring hard-to-reach respondents into the survey, up to four attempts were made to each telephone number selected for inclusion into the sample. Callbacks were made at different times and on different days to increase the probability of finding voters available for the interview. Where possible, appointments are made at specified dates and times to maximize convenience. 2

Data Processing The data file resulting from CATI interviewing is itself virtually error-free. Even so, a final series of data checks were performed by means of a specially designed cleaning program that scrutinizes each respondent record for internally inconsistent information. Once the data were determined to be clean and error-free, the overall sample was weighted to align it to its proper statewide proportions by demographic characteristics of the state s registered voter population. Guide to Reading the Tables The following is an explanation of the detailed statistical tabulations contained in this report: The question or questions upon which the data are based is shown at the top of each table. Tables are percentaged vertically with the raw percentage base appearing at the top of each column. The data have been weighted to known parameters of the statewide registered voter population. All percentages and frequencies reported in each table are therefore weighted tabulations. In instances where percentages are calculated on small bases (e.g., when the base is fewer than 1 respondents) the reader is urged to interpret the data with caution, since results are subject to larger levels of sampling error. Throughout the tables an asterisk is used to denote a value of less than 1/2 of 1%. A hyphen indicates zero value. On some tables the percentages may add to more than 1% due to multiple mentions. s of subgroups used in the tabulations may add to less than the total number of respondents due to some respondents not reporting that characteristic. 3

Subgroup Definitions The following are some of the definitions applicable to some of the voter subgroups reported in this volume: Southern California: Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, Imperial, Santa Barbara, Ventura, Kern, and San Luis Obispo counties rthern California: all other 48 California counties SF Bay/rth/ Coast: San Francisco, Marin, Napa, Sonoma, Solano, Contra Costa, Alameda, Santa Clara, San Mateo, Del rte, Humboldt, Trinity, Mendocino, Santa Cruz, and Monterey counties Valley/ Sierras: Coastal Counties: Inland counties: Los Angeles: San Diego/Orange: So Cal: SF Bay Area: Valley: rth Butte, Colusa, Fresno, Glenn, Kern, Kings, Madera, Merced, Placer, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Shasta, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Tulare, Yolo, Yuba, Siskiyou, Modoc, Lassen, Plumas, Butte, Lake, Sierra, Nevada, El Dorado, Alpine, Amador, Calaveras, Tuolumne, Mono, Mariposa, and Inyo counties San Diego, Orange, Los Angeles, Ventura, Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, Monterey, Santa Cruz, San Mateo, San Francisco, Contra Costa, Alameda, Marin, Napa, Solano, Sonoma, Santa Clara, Mendocino, Humboldt and Del rte counties all other 38 California counties Los Angeles County San Diego County and Orange counties San Bernardino, Riverside, Imperial, Ventura, Santa Barbara, and San Luis Obispo San Francisco, Marin, Napa, Sonoma, Solano, Contra Costa, Alameda, Santa Clara, San Mateo Butte, Colusa, Fresno, Glenn, Kern, Kings, Madera, Merced, Placer, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Shasta, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Tulare, Yolo, and Yuba Alpine, Amador, Calaveras, Del rte, El Dorado, Humboldt, Inyo, Lake, Lassen, Mariposa, Mendocino, Monterey, Modoc, Mono, Nevada, Plumas, San Benito, Santa Cruz, Sierra, Siskiyou, Trinity, and Tuolumne 4

Estimates of Sampling Error In any survey based on a sampling, there is some sampling error introduced into the data by the process of sampling itself. When the sample has been drawn using random processes, it is possible to apply probability principles to determine the potential range of such error. While survey samples of human populations rarely, if ever, meet all of the criteria theoretically required for the application of these principles, it is customary to use them as an approximation of error that is introduced as a result of sampling. The table below shows the range of error associated with samples of various sizes at the 95% confidence level, which is customary for most public opinion surveys. For example, if 5% of the overall sample of 584 likely voters in the Democratic presidential primary answered yes to a specific question, this statistic would have a sampling error of plus or minus about 4. percentage points at the 95% confidence level. This means that there is a 95% chance that had the overall population of all likely Democratic primary voters statewide been interviewed using the same questionnaire and methods, the results of such a census would yield a result between 46% and 54%. The same procedure can be used to estimate the sample error ranges of any other statistic contained in this report. Approximate percentage distribution of replies to question Sample size 1% 3% 5% 7% 9% 2 +/- 4.3 +/- 6.5 +/- 7.1 +/- 6.5 +/- 4.3 4 +/- 3. +/- 4.6 +/- 5. +/- 4.6 +/- 3. 584 +/- 2.5 +/- 3.7 +/- 4. +/- 3.7 +/- 2.5 14 +/- 1.9 +/- 2.9 +/- 3.2 +/- 2.9 +/- 1.9 There are many other possible sources of error other than sampling variability in this and any other public opinion survey. The overall design and execution of the survey minimized the potential for these other sources of error. 5

Questions Asked ASKED OF LIKELY VOTERS IN THE JUNE CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY: I am going to read the names of the candidates running for the Democratic nomination for President. If the June Democratic primary for President in California were being held today, for whom would you vote (NAMES OF CANDIDATES READ IN RANDOM ORDER) or someone else? ASKED OF ALL REGISTERED VOTERS: Please tell me whether your opinion of the following Presidential candidates is favorable, unfavorable or whether you don t know enough about that person to have an opinion. (NAMES AND TITLES OF CANDIDATES READ IN RANDOM ORDER) Is your opinion of (NAME) favorable or unfavorable? 6

Q1 (LV Dem) (Banner 1) : Likely Voter in Democratic Primary Field Poll 216 Southern CA rthern CA SF Bay /rth/ Coast Region Area Party Registration Valley /Sierras Coastal counties Inland counties L.A. County San Diego/ Orange So. CA Q1. I am going to read the names of the candidates running for the Democratic nomination for President. If the June Democratic primary for President in California were being held today, for whom would you vote - (READ NAMES OF CANDIDATES)? 584 345 239 159 8 449 135 165 84 89 73 14 33 472-112 65 3 179 53 66 Weighted 584 39 275 174 11 431 153 152 74 76 98 15 35 455-129 5 343 15 47 55 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% - 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% Hillary 277 146 131 86 45 22 75 77 29 34 46 83 8 227-5 19 155 74 3 24 Clinton 47.4% 47.2% 47.7% 49.4% 44.8% 46.8% 49.1% 5.7% 39.5% 45.2% 46.9% 55.2% 23.1% 49.8% - 39.1% 38.% 45.3% 49.2% 64.2% 42.7% Bernie 241 131 11 79 31 193 48 62 34 34 29 59 25 178-63 29 147 63 12 24 Sanders 41.4% 42.5% 4.% 45.7% 3.4% 44.7% 31.7% 4.5% 46.2% 44.4% 29.3% 39.2% 71.8% 39.1% - 49.2% 59.2% 42.9% 42.2% 25.% 43.5% (DO NOT 24 8 16 1 15 7 17 1 4 4 14 1 2 14-1 1 19 3 1 1 READ) OTHER 4.1% 2.6% 5.9%.4% 15.1% 1.7% 11.2%.5% 5.% 4.8% 14.1%.5% 4.4% 3.1% - 7.9% 1.7% 5.5% 2.2% 1.8% 2.2% (DO NOT 41 24 18 8 1 29 12 13 7 4 1 8 * 36-5 1 22 9 4 6 READ) UNDECIDED 7.1% 7.7% 6.4% 4.5% 9.7% 6.8% 7.9% 8.3% 9.3% 5.5% 9.8% 5.2%.7% 8.% - 3.8% 1.2% 6.4% 6.3% 9.% 11.7% Valley SF Bay Area. CA Democrat Republican party preference/ others Voting History First time voter White non- Hispanic Ethnicity Latino Black Asian/ Field Research Corporation Table 1 7

Q1 (LV Dem) (Banner 2) : Likely Voter in Democratic Primary Field Poll 216 Gender Age Nativity Political Ideology Male Female 18-29 3-39 4-49 5-64 65 or older Born in US Born outside US Strongly conservative Moderately conservative Middle of the road Moderately liberal Strongly liberal GOP Tea Party Identification A lot /some t at all/dk Born again Christian Q1. I am going to read the names of the candidates running for the Democratic nomination for President. If the June Democratic primary for President in California were being held today, for whom would you vote - (READ NAMES OF CANDIDATES)? 584 278 36 12 94 72 149 167 333 5 34 3 22 11 185 - - 65 519 Weighted 584 257 327 74 1 88 176 145 335 49 32 26 2 13 2 - - 77 57 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% - - 1.% 1.% Hillary 277 14 173 13 31 45 95 93 149 28 15 11 98 56 88 - - 44 233 Clinton 47.4% 4.3% 53.% 17.6% 3.6% 51.2% 54.2% 63.9% 44.6% 57.6% 47.1% 42.5% 48.8% 54.6% 43.8% - - 56.5% 46.1% Bernie 241 125 117 57 56 35 59 34 153 18 8 9 75 42 99 - - 25 216 Sanders 41.4% 48.5% 35.8% 77.2% 56.2% 39.3% 33.7% 23.2% 45.7% 36.5% 24.% 33.4% 37.2% 41.% 49.3% - - 32.9% 42.6% (DO NOT 24 17 7 1 5 1 7 1 15 1 4 4 14-2 - - 5 2 READ) OTHER 4.1% 6.8% 2.1% 1.1% 5.4% 1.3% 4.1% 6.6% 4.4% 1.7% 13.1% 15.2% 7.% - 1.% - - 5.9% 3.9% (DO NOT 41 11 3 3 8 7 14 9 18 2 5 2 14 5 12 - - 4 38 READ) UNDECIDED 7.1% 4.4% 9.1% 4.1% 7.9% 8.1% 8.% 6.2% 5.3% 4.2% 15.8% 8.9% 7.% 4.5% 5.9% - - 4.7% 7.4% born again, not born again Field Research Corporation Table 2 8

Q1 (LV Dem) (Banner 3) : Likely Voter in Democratic Primary Field Poll 216 H.S. graduate or less Education Household Income Religion Marital Status Some college/ trade school College graduate Post graduate work $2, Under - $2, $4, $4, - $6, $6, - $1, More than $1, Protestant/ other Christian Catholic religion preference Married/ t married living together Widow/ separated/ divorced Never married Parent/ Guardian/ Grandparent of child under 18 Parent Grandparent Neither Q1. I am going to read the names of the candidates running for the Democratic nomination for President. If the June Democratic primary for President in California were being held today, for whom would you vote - (READ NAMES OF CANDIDATES)? 584 96 162 171 151 62 97 82 129 169 138 162 162 19 324 18 146 97 58 43 487 Weighted 584 91 158 17 161 55 87 72 136 188 145 148 172 18 349 12 129 113 56 415 471 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% Hillary 277 51 69 62 92 26 43 3 62 95 84 81 59 51 174 58 45 52 32 194 225 Clinton 47.4% 56.8% 43.8% 36.2% 57.3% 46.4% 49.5% 4.8% 45.7% 5.5% 58.1% 54.7% 34.2% 46.8% 49.9% 56.7% 34.6% 45.9% 56.% 46.6% 47.8% Bernie 241 32 6 91 58 24 39 33 61 73 46 47 11 4 14 3 71 49 17 176 192 Sanders 41.4% 35.3% 38.% 53.2% 36.2% 42.9% 44.3% 45.6% 45.% 38.8% 31.9% 31.7% 58.8% 37.4% 4.% 29.5% 54.8% 43.7% 3.1% 42.4% 4.8% (DO NOT 24 4 16 2 3 3 2 3 4 1 8 6 3 7 16 5 3 7 5 12 18 READ) OTHER 4.1% 4.2% 9.9% 1.3% 1.6% 5.4% 2.6% 4.6% 3.% 5.5% 5.6% 4.2% 1.7% 6.4% 4.7% 5.% 2.2% 5.8% 9.6% 2.9% 3.7% (DO NOT 41 3 13 16 8 3 3 7 9 1 6 14 9 1 19 9 11 5 2 34 36 READ) UNDECIDED 7.1% 3.7% 8.3% 9.3% 4.9% 5.3% 3.6% 9.% 6.3% 5.2% 4.4% 9.3% 5.3% 9.5% 5.4% 8.8% 8.5% 4.6% 4.3% 8.1% 7.7% n- Parent Field Research Corporation Table 3 9

Q1 (LV Dem) (Banner 4) : Likely Voter in Democratic Primary Field Poll 216 Tenure Union Affiliation Dem Primary Preference GOP Primary Preference GOP 23 CA recall voter Own Rent / McClintock union n-union Schwarz- Clinton Sander Cruz Kasich Trump /other /Don't HH HH enegger recall Didn't vote Q1. I am going to read the names of the candidates running for the Democratic nomination for President. If the June Democratic primary for President in California were being held today, for whom would you vote - (READ NAMES OF CANDIDATES)? 584 346 23 137 441 267 256 - - - - - - Weighted Hillary Clinton Bernie Sanders (DO NOT READ) OTHER (DO NOT READ) UNDECIDED 584 367 212 145 433 277 241 - - - - - - 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% - - - - - - 277 188 88 77 198 277 - - - - - - - 47.4% 51.3% 41.6% 52.9% 45.8% 1.% - - - - - - - 241 136 15 58 181-241 - - - - - - 41.4% 37.1% 49.6% 39.9% 41.8% - 1.% - - - - - - 24 2 4 4 2 - - - - - - - - 4.1% 5.4% 2.% 2.7% 4.7% - - - - - - - - 41 23 14 7 34 - - - - - - - - 7.1% 6.2% 6.8% 4.6% 7.7% - - - - - - - - Field Research Corporation Table 4 1

Q1 (LV Dem) (Banner 5) : Likely Voter in Democratic Primary Field Poll 216 Voter Age Voters under age 4 Voters age 4+ Gender Ethnicity Marital Status Gender Ethnicity Marital Status Married/ Married/ Male Female White t Single White t Single Asian/ Asian/ non- Latino married /Never All other Male Female non- Latino married /Never Hispanic living married Hispanic living married All other together together Q1. I am going to read the names of the candidates running for the Democratic nomination for President. If the June Democratic primary for President in California were being held today, for whom would you vote - (READ NAMES OF CANDIDATES)? 584 196 111 85 77 86 33 9 97 6 388 167 221 219 93 76 234 49 12 Weighted 584 175 83 92 91 61 23 9 77 5 49 174 235 248 89 72 259 52 96 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% Hillary 277 44 14 29 24 16 4 24 2-233 89 144 127 58 48 151 24 58 Clinton 47.4% 25.% 17.4% 31.9% 26.3% 25.4% 19.% 26.1% 26.1% - 57.% 51.2% 61.3% 51.3% 65.5% 66.1% 58.2% 47.3% 59.9% Bernie 241 114 59 55 56 42 15 58 51 5 128 65 62 92 21 14 82 2 25 Sanders 41.4% 65.2% 71.6% 59.4% 62.1% 69.% 67.% 63.9% 65.3% 84.7% 31.2% 37.5% 26.5% 37.% 23.9% 2.1% 31.7% 39.% 26.4% (DO NOT 24 6 6-5 - 1 5-1 18 11 7 13 3 1 11 3 4 READ) OTHER 4.1% 3.6% 7.5% - 5.9% - 3.6% 6.% - 15.3% 4.4% 6.4% 2.9% 5.4% 3.8% 1.6% 4.2% 5.4% 4.4% (DO NOT 41 11 3 8 5 3 2 4 7-3 8 22 15 6 9 15 4 9 READ) UNDECIDED 7.1% 6.2% 3.5% 8.7% 5.6% 5.6% 1.3% 4.% 8.6% - 7.4% 4.9% 9.3% 6.2% 6.8% 12.2% 5.8% 8.3% 9.3% Field Research Corporation Table 5 11

Q12c (LV Dem) (Banner 1: Likely Voter in Democratic Primary Field Poll 216 Southern CA rthern CA SF Bay /rth/ Coast Region Area Party Registration Valley /Sierras Coastal counties Inland counties L.A. County San Diego/ Orange So. CA Q12c. Please tell me whether your opinion of the following Presidential candidates is favorable, unfavorable or whether you don t know enough about that person to have an opinion: Bernie Sanders, Democrat 384 219 165 111 54 297 87 15 54 56 47 99 23 315-69 57 22 115 32 44 375 23 172 17 65 278 98 16 44 48 63 93 22 29-85 45 199 17 35 43 Weighted 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% - 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 282 151 131 89 42 22 63 79 34 33 4 75 2 217-65 31 158 72 25 33 75.2% 74.5% 76.% 83.4% 63.9% 79.1% 64.1% 74.2% 78.2% 69.1% 64.6% 81.4% 91.3% 74.8% - 76.6% 69.4% 79.4% 67.2% 71.% 76.9% 61 32 29 11 18 35 26 18 4 1 17 1 2 48-13 7 32 19 5 4 UN 16.2% 15.9% 16.6% 1.% 27.6% 12.5% 26.8% 16.6% 9.7% 21.7% 26.6% 1.9% 8.7% 16.5% - 15.4% 14.6% 16.1% 18.1% 15.% 9.5% 32 2 13 7 6 23 9 1 5 4 6 7-25 - 7 7 9 16 5 6 8.6% 9.6% 7.3% 6.7% 8.4% 8.4% 9.2% 9.2% 12.1% 9.3% 8.8% 7.7% - 8.8% - 8.% 16.% 4.5% 14.6% 14.1% 13.5% Valley SF Bay Area. CA Democrat Republican party preference/ others Voting History First time voter White non- Hispanic Ethnicity Latino Black Asian/ Field Research Corporation Table 81 12

Q12c (LV Dem) (Banner 2: Likely Voter in Democratic Primary Field Poll 216 Gender Age Nativity Political Ideology Male Female 18-29 3-39 4-49 5-64 65 or older Born in US Born outside US Strongly conservative Moderately conservative Middle of the road Moderately liberal Strongly liberal GOP Tea Party Identification A lot /some t at all/dk Born again Christian Q12c. Please tell me whether your opinion of the following Presidential candidates is favorable, unfavorable or whether you don t know enough about that person to have an opinion: Bernie Sanders, Democrat 384 179 25 74 62 51 93 14 333 5 19 16 147 65 126 - - 65 319 Weighted 375 174 22 55 69 58 1 94 323 52 21 16 148 55 123 - - 77 298 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% - - 1.% 1.% 282 138 144 51 57 49 7 55 249 33 1 1 11 43 19 - - 5 232 75.2% 79.8% 71.2% 92.8% 83.6% 84.9% 69.5% 58.9% 77.% 63.3% 47.3% 6.3% 67.9% 76.7% 88.9% - - 65.% 77.8% UN 61 24 37 2 8 4 16 32 5 11 9 3 29 7 12 - - 15 46 16.2% 13.6% 18.5% 2.9% 11.4% 6.8% 16.1% 33.6% 15.5% 21.1% 42.3% 2.9% 19.2% 13.4% 9.8% - - 19.2% 15.5% 32 11 21 2 3 5 14 7 24 8 2 3 19 5 2 - - 12 2 8.6% 6.6% 1.3% 4.4% 5.% 8.3% 14.5% 7.5% 7.5% 15.6% 1.5% 18.8% 12.9% 9.9% 1.3% - - 15.8% 6.7% born again, not born again Field Research Corporation Table 82 13

Q12c (LV Dem) (Banner 3: Likely Voter in Democratic Primary Field Poll 216 H.S. graduat e or less Education Household Income Religion Marital Status Some college / trade school College graduat e Post graduat e work Under $2, $2, - $4, $4, - $6, $6, - $1, More than $1, Protestant / other Christian Catholi c religio n preference Married / t married living togethe r Widow/ separated/ divorce d Never marrie d Parent/ Guardian/ Grandparent of child under 18 Q12c. Please tell me whether your opinion of the following Presidential candidates is favorable, unfavorable or whether you don t know enough about that person to have an opinion: Bernie Sanders, Democrat 384 59 19 117 97 46 62 51 84 122 84 1 16 83 216 66 99 97 58 23 287 375 63 11 113 97 4 55 43 86 13 87 93 17 79 229 61 84 15 59 213 27 Weighted 1. 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1. 1. 1.% 1.% 1.% 1. 1. 1. 1. % % % % % % % 282 37 66 95 83 23 39 27 72 18 65 59 93 57 176 35 7 87 33 164 195 75.2% 59.6% 65.4% 84.6% 85.6% 57.3% 7.7% 63.2% 83.9% 82.6% 74.5% 63.3% 86.9% 72.6% 76.9% 57.1% 83.2% 82.6% 56.% 76.9% 72.3% UNFAVORABL 61 14 24 11 11 8 11 9 12 17 15 21 9 15 36 18 7 12 19 3 49 E 16.2% 22.8% 24.1% 9.9% 11.5% 19.5% 19.6% 2.6% 13.9% 13.4% 16.9% 22.8% 8.6% 18.7% 15.6% 29.4% 8.9% 11.% 33.1% 14.1% 18.3% 32 11 11 6 3 9 5 7 2 5 8 13 5 7 17 8 7 7 6 19 25 8.6% 17.6% 1.5% 5.5% 2.9% 23.1% 9.7% 16.2% 2.2% 4.% 8.6% 13.9% 4.5% 8.7% 7.6% 13.5% 7.9% 6.4% 11.% 8.9% 9.4% Parent Grandparent Neithe r n- Parent Field Research Corporation Table 83 14

Q12c (LV Dem) (Banner 4: Likely Voter in Democratic Primary Field Poll 216 Own Tenure Union Affiliation Employment Status Rent / union HH nunion HH Employed t employed Dem Primary Preference GOP Primary Preference Obama job rating Clinton Sander Cruz Kasich Trump Approve Disapprove Schwarzenegger GOP 23 CA recall voter McClintock /other /Don't recall Didn't vote Financial well-being vs. last year Better change Worse off now /no off now opinion Q12c. Please tell me whether your opinion of the following Presidential candidates is favorable, unfavorable or whether you don t know enough about that person to have an opinion: Bernie Sanders, Democrat 384 233 147 96 286 217 167 169 183 - - - 332 38 - - - 94 52 31 Weighted 375 239 134 12 271 215 16 172 166 - - - 317 46 - - - 91 53 34 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% - - - 1.% 1.% - - - 1.% 1.% 1.% 282 177 14 78 23 176 16 15 165 - - - 254 21 - - - 69 35 27 75.2% 74.% 77.6% 76.2% 74.7% 81.9% 66.2% 61.% 99.1% - - - 8.2% 45.3% - - - 76.4% 66.2% 78.8% 61 48 13 15 46 24 37 45 1 - - - 41 18 - - - 9 12 4 UN 16.2% 19.8% 1.% 14.3% 17.1% 11.% 23.2% 26.3%.5% - - - 12.8% 39.8% - - - 9.4% 23.1% 13.% 32 15 17 1 22 15 17 22 1 - - - 22 7 - - - 13 6 3 8.6% 6.2% 12.4% 9.6% 8.2% 7.1% 1.5% 12.7%.4% - - - 7.% 14.9% - - - 14.2% 1.7% 8.2% Field Research Corporation Table 84 15

Q12a (LV Dem) (Banner 1: Likely Voter in Democratic Primary Field Poll 216 Southern CA rthern CA SF Bay /rth/ Coast Region Area Party Registration Valley /Sierras Coastal counties Inland counties L.A. County San Diego/ Orange So. CA Q12a. Please tell me whether your opinion of the following Presidential candidates is favorable, unfavorable or whether you don t know enough about that person to have an opinion: Hillary Clinton, Democrat 384 219 165 111 54 297 87 15 54 56 47 99 23 315-69 57 22 115 32 44 375 23 172 17 65 278 98 16 44 48 63 93 22 29-85 45 199 17 35 43 Weighted 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% - 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 262 141 121 78 43 197 65 8 28 3 38 73 13 213-49 3 137 77 28 29 69.9% 69.4% 7.4% 73.2% 65.7% 71.% 66.7% 75.4% 63.8% 63.% 61.2% 78.7% 57.4% 73.6% - 57.2% 67.% 68.6% 71.3% 8.1% 66.4% 12 55 47 27 2 72 3 2 15 17 22 18 9 68-34 13 59 26 3 14 UN 27.2% 27.% 27.4% 25.2% 31.% 26.1% 3.4% 19.2% 35.1% 35.% 35.3% 19.5% 42.6% 23.5% - 39.9% 28.2% 29.8% 24.4% 9.9% 32.5% 11 7 4 2 2 8 3 6 * 1 2 2-9 - 2 2 3 5 4 * 2.9% 3.5% 2.2% 1.5% 3.3% 3.% 2.8% 5.4% 1.1% 2.% 3.5% 1.8% - 2.9% - 2.9% 4.9% 1.5% 4.2% 1.% 1.1% Valley SF Bay Area. CA Democrat Republican party preference/ others Voting History First time voter White non- Hispanic Ethnicity Latino Black Asian/ Field Research Corporation Table 73 16

Q12a (LV Dem) (Banner 2: Likely Voter in Democratic Primary Field Poll 216 Gender Age Nativity Political Ideology Male Female 18-29 3-39 4-49 5-64 65 or older Born in US Born outside US Strongly conservative Moderately conservative Middle of the road Moderately liberal Strongly liberal GOP Tea Party Identification A lot /some t at all/dk Born again Christian Q12a. Please tell me whether your opinion of the following Presidential candidates is favorable, unfavorable or whether you don t know enough about that person to have an opinion: Hillary Clinton, Democrat 384 179 25 74 62 51 93 14 333 5 19 16 147 65 126 - - 65 319 Weighted 375 174 22 55 69 58 1 94 323 52 21 16 148 55 123 - - 77 298 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% - - 1.% 1.% 262 15 158 24 43 41 82 72 218 43 11 8 1 43 92 - - 55 27 69.9% 6.3% 78.1% 43.5% 62.8% 71.5% 81.4% 77.% 67.7% 83.3% 55.6% 49.3% 67.1% 77.5% 75.4% - - 71.7% 69.4% UN 12 64 38 28 24 15 15 19 96 6 9 8 41 12 3 - - 21 81 27.2% 36.9% 18.8% 5.4% 35.3% 26.8% 15.4% 2.6% 29.6% 12.4% 44.4% 5.7% 28.% 21.6% 24.2% - - 27.5% 27.1% 11 5 6 3 1 1 3 2 9 2 - - 7 * * - - 1 1 2.9% 2.8% 3.% 6.1% 1.8% 1.7% 3.2% 2.4% 2.7% 4.3% - - 4.9%.9%.4% - -.8% 3.5% born again, not born again Field Research Corporation Table 74 17

Q12a (LV Dem) (Banner 3: Likely Voter in Democratic Primary Field Poll 216 H.S. graduat e or less Education Household Income Religion Marital Status Some college / trade school College graduat e Post graduat e work Under $2, $2, - $4, $4, - $6, $6, - $1, More than $1, Protestant / other Christian Catholi c religio n preference Married / t married living togethe r Widow/ separated/ divorce d Never marrie d Parent/ Guardian/ Grandparent of child under 18 Q12a. Please tell me whether your opinion of the following Presidential candidates is favorable, unfavorable or whether you don t know enough about that person to have an opinion: Hillary Clinton, Democrat 384 59 19 117 97 46 62 51 84 122 84 1 16 83 216 66 99 97 58 23 287 375 63 11 113 97 4 55 43 86 13 87 93 17 79 229 61 84 15 59 213 27 Weighted 1. 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1. 1. 1.% 1.% 1.% 1. 1. 1. 1. % % % % % % % 262 46 56 79 79 25 4 27 6 94 68 69 64 55 172 4 48 75 45 143 187 69.9% 72.8% 55.8% 69.9% 81.9% 62.% 72.4% 62.1% 69.7% 72.% 77.4% 73.7% 59.6% 68.9% 75.2% 66.3% 57.8% 71.3% 76.7% 67.4% 69.3% UNFAVORABL 12 15 4 31 16 14 11 15 25 35 18 2 39 24 54 16 31 28 13 61 74 E 27.2% 24.6% 39.6% 27.4% 16.4% 35.3% 19.3% 34.2% 28.8% 26.7% 2.6% 21.6% 36.7% 29.9% 23.6% 27.% 37.3% 26.6% 21.9% 28.8% 27.4% 11 2 5 3 2 1 5 2 1 2 2 4 4 1 3 4 4 2 1 8 9 2.9% 2.6% 4.6% 2.7% 1.7% 2.7% 8.2% 3.7% 1.5% 1.3% 2.% 4.7% 3.7% 1.2% 1.2% 6.6% 5.% 2.1% 1.4% 3.7% 3.2% Parent Grandparent Neithe r n- Parent Field Research Corporation Table 75 18

Q12a (LV Dem) (Banner 4: Likely Voter in Democratic Primary Field Poll 216 Own Tenure Union Affiliation Employment Status Rent / union HH nunion HH Employed t employed Dem Primary Preference GOP Primary Preference Obama job rating Clinton Sander Cruz Kasich Trump Approve Disapprove Schwarzenegger GOP 23 CA recall voter McClintock /other /Don't recall Didn't vote Financial well-being vs. last year Better change Worse off now /no off now opinion Q12a. Please tell me whether your opinion of the following Presidential candidates is favorable, unfavorable or whether you don t know enough about that person to have an opinion: Hillary Clinton, Democrat 384 233 147 96 286 217 167 169 183 - - - 332 38 - - - 94 52 31 Weighted 375 239 134 12 271 215 16 172 166 - - - 317 46 - - - 91 53 34 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% - - - 1.% 1.% - - - 1.% 1.% 1.% 262 18 81 71 189 149 113 169 83 - - - 242 12 - - - 69 38 24 69.9% 75.% 6.7% 69.7% 69.7% 69.4% 7.5% 98.% 49.6% - - - 76.3% 26.1% - - - 76.4% 71.7% 71.% 12 56 46 28 74 59 43 3 77 - - - 65 34 - - - 18 13 9 UN 27.2% 23.4% 34.3% 27.2% 27.4% 27.5% 26.8% 1.6% 46.5% - - - 2.5% 72.6% - - - 19.7% 23.9% 25.6% 11 4 7 3 8 7 4 1 6 - - - 1 1 - - - 4 2 1 2.9% 1.6% 4.9% 3.% 2.9% 3.1% 2.7%.4% 3.9% - - - 3.3% 1.3% - - - 3.9% 4.4% 3.5% Field Research Corporation Table 76 19

Q12c (Banner 1: Registered Voters Field Poll 216 Southern CA rthern CA SF Bay /rth/ Coast Region Area Party Registration Valley /Sierras Coastal counties Inland counties L.A. County San Diego/ Orange So. CA Q12c. Please tell me whether your opinion of the following Presidential candidates is favorable, unfavorable or whether you don t know enough about that person to have an opinion: Bernie Sanders, Democrat 8 57 293 177 116 593 27 226 146 122 111 159 36 382 21 217 132 461 24 42 18 8 484 316 184 132 574 226 224 132 11 133 162 38 345 221 234 131 476 196 43 11 Weighted 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 44 254 186 127 59 345 95 131 65 53 57 113 22 25 44 147 81 246 116 28 59 55.% 52.5% 58.9% 69.% 44.8% 6.1% 42.1% 58.7% 48.9% 48.% 42.5% 69.5% 56.9% 72.5% 19.7% 62.6% 61.9% 51.6% 59.3% 65.8% 58.5% 278 18 99 42 56 174 14 72 52 46 58 35 16 6 155 63 31 187 53 9 33 UN 34.8% 37.2% 31.2% 23.% 42.7% 3.3% 46.1% 31.9% 39.6% 41.7% 43.3% 21.4% 42.4% 17.4% 7.4% 26.9% 23.4% 39.3% 26.9% 21.2% 32.2% 81 5 31 15 16 55 27 21 15 11 19 15 * 35 22 25 19 44 27 6 9 1.2% 1.4% 9.9% 7.9% 12.5% 9.5% 11.8% 9.4% 11.5% 1.3% 14.1% 9.%.7% 1.1% 9.9% 1.5% 14.7% 9.2% 13.9% 13.% 9.3% Valley SF Bay Area. CA Democrat Republican party preference/ others Voting History First time voter White non- Hispanic Ethnicity Latino Black Asian/ Field Research Corporation Table 61 2

Q12c (Banner 2: Registered Voters Field Poll 216 Gender Age Nativity Political Ideology Male Female 18-29 3-39 4-49 5-64 65 or older Born in US Born outside US Strongly conservative Moderately conservative Middle of the road Moderately liberal Strongly liberal GOP Tea Party Identification A lot /some t at all/dk Born again Christian Q12c. Please tell me whether your opinion of the following Presidential candidates is favorable, unfavorable or whether you don t know enough about that person to have an opinion: Bernie Sanders, Democrat 8 386 414 156 128 114 187 215 697 98 114 91 323 11 151 124 77 184 616 Weighted 8 375 425 131 13 126 221 192 693 13 118 86 337 91 147 135 86 25 595 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 44 25 235 12 81 72 14 81 384 56 23 24 182 71 129 15 29 84 356 55.% 54.7% 55.3% 78.% 62.8% 57.% 47.1% 42.% 55.3% 54.2% 19.6% 27.3% 54.1% 77.9% 88.2% 1.9% 33.4% 41.2% 59.8% UN 278 14 138 24 37 4 82 95 244 32 89 45 111 11 16 112 43 9 189 34.8% 37.3% 32.6% 18.7% 28.3% 31.5% 37.3% 49.5% 35.2% 31.% 75.1% 52.% 32.9% 12.2% 1.6% 83.6% 49.8% 43.9% 31.7% 81 3 51 4 12 15 34 16 65 15 6 18 44 9 2 7 15 31 51 1.2% 8.% 12.1% 3.4% 8.9% 11.5% 15.6% 8.5% 9.4% 14.8% 5.3% 2.7% 13.% 1.% 1.1% 5.5% 16.8% 14.9% 8.5% born again, not born again Field Research Corporation Table 62 21

Q12c (Banner 3: Registered Voters Field Poll 216 H.S. graduat e or less Education Household Income Religion Marital Status Some college / trade school College graduat e Post graduat e work Under $2, $2, - $4, $4, - $6, $6, - $1, More than $1, Protestant / other Christian Catholi c religio n preference Married / t married living togethe r Widow/ separated/ divorce d Never marrie d Parent/ Guardian/ Grandparent of child under 18 Q12c. Please tell me whether your opinion of the following Presidential candidates is favorable, unfavorable or whether you don t know enough about that person to have an opinion: Bernie Sanders, Democrat 8 148 235 224 188 94 111 113 179 247 246 199 25 136 467 141 184 28 118 476 592 8 155 225 227 188 88 15 14 181 26 252 189 28 139 498 126 171 225 121 458 575 Weighted 1. 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1. 1. 1.% 1.% 1.% 1. 1. 1. 1. % % % % % % % 44 71 18 141 118 52 55 49 13 15 17 98 134 92 257 56 126 129 49 263 311 55.% 45.7% 48.2% 62.3% 62.6% 58.8% 52.9% 47.2% 56.8% 57.7% 42.6% 51.7% 64.5% 66.3% 51.5% 44.2% 73.6% 57.5% 4.6% 57.5% 54.1% UNFAVORABL 278 54 9 68 65 19 37 4 63 96 114 69 57 37 2 48 27 74 57 149 25 E 34.8% 34.7% 4.1% 29.8% 34.4% 21.1% 35.4% 38.5% 34.8% 37.1% 45.5% 36.3% 27.4% 26.4% 4.1% 38.4% 15.9% 32.8% 47.4% 32.7% 35.6% 81 3 26 18 6 18 12 15 15 13 3 23 17 1 42 22 18 22 15 45 6 1.2% 19.6% 11.7% 7.8% 2.9% 2.1% 11.7% 14.3% 8.4% 5.2% 11.9% 12.% 8.1% 7.3% 8.3% 17.3% 1.5% 9.7% 12.% 9.8% 1.3% Parent Grandparent Neithe r n- Parent Field Research Corporation Table 63 22

Q12c (Banner 4: Registered Voters Field Poll 216 Own Tenure Union Affiliation Employment Status Rent / union HH nunion HH Employed t employed Dem Primary Preference GOP Primary Preference Obama job rating GOP 23 CA recall voter Clinton Sander Cruz Kasich Trump Approve Disapprove Schwarzenegger McClintock /other /Don't recall Didn't vote Financial well-being vs. last year Better change Worse off now /no off now opinion Q12c. Please tell me whether your opinion of the following Presidential candidates is favorable, unfavorable or whether you don t know enough about that person to have an opinion: Bernie Sanders, Democrat 8 475 316 179 615 464 336 169 183 45 29 67 488 284 66 37 43 199 16 95 8 496 299 188 66 475 325 172 166 53 29 78 47 31 75 41 49 19 11 1 Weighted 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 44 254 185 11 327 272 168 15 165 14 14 6 365 58 18 2 8 114 59 42 55.% 51.2% 61.8% 58.6% 54.% 57.3% 51.7% 61.% 99.1% 26.5% 47.5% 8.1% 77.7% 19.4% 23.8% 6.% 17.3% 6.1% 53.9% 41.8% 278 199 77 56 22 162 117 45 1 35 13 65 65 28 49 35 35 56 39 44 UN 34.8% 4.1% 25.7% 3.1% 36.3% 34.% 36.% 26.3%.5% 66.5% 44.2% 83.6% 13.8% 69.3% 65.9% 85.8% 72.7% 29.4% 35.3% 43.6% 81 43 37 21 59 41 4 22 1 4 2 6 4 34 8 3 5 2 12 15 1.2% 8.7% 12.5% 11.3% 9.7% 8.7% 12.3% 12.7%.4% 7.% 8.4% 8.3% 8.5% 11.3% 1.3% 8.2% 1.% 1.5% 1.7% 14.6% Field Research Corporation Table 64 23

Q12a (Banner 1: Registered Voters Field Poll 216 Southern CA rthern CA SF Bay /rth/ Coast Region Area Party Registration Valley /Sierras Coastal counties Inland counties L.A. County San Diego/ Orange So. CA Q12a. Please tell me whether your opinion of the following Presidential candidates is favorable, unfavorable or whether you don t know enough about that person to have an opinion: Hillary Clinton, Democrat 8 57 293 177 116 593 27 226 146 122 111 159 36 382 21 217 132 461 24 42 18 8 484 316 184 132 574 226 224 132 11 133 162 38 345 221 234 131 476 196 43 11 Weighted 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 377 213 164 18 56 293 85 124 47 39 52 11 15 25 26 12 59 192 113 32 5 47.2% 44.1% 51.9% 58.4% 42.7% 51.% 37.5% 55.3% 35.4% 36.% 38.9% 61.9% 38.5% 72.5% 11.6% 43.5% 44.6% 4.2% 57.8% 74.3% 49.4% 387 248 139 67 72 251 135 85 82 66 78 52 23 82 187 117 63 266 71 7 47 UN 48.3% 51.2% 43.9% 36.4% 54.4% 43.8% 59.8% 37.8% 61.9% 6.6% 58.4% 32.2% 6.8% 23.8% 84.7% 5.1% 47.9% 55.9% 36.3% 17.5% 46.5% 36 23 13 1 4 3 6 15 4 4 4 1 * 13 8 15 1 19 12 4 4 4.5% 4.7% 4.3% 5.2% 2.9% 5.2% 2.7% 6.9% 2.7% 3.4% 2.7% 5.9%.7% 3.7% 3.7% 6.4% 7.5% 3.9% 5.9% 8.3% 4.1% Valley SF Bay Area. CA Democrat Republican party preference/ others Voting History First time voter White non- Hispanic Ethnicity Latino Black Asian/ Field Research Corporation Table 53 24

Q12a (Banner 2: Registered Voters Field Poll 216 Gender Age Nativity Political Ideology Male Female 18-29 3-39 4-49 5-64 65 or older Born in US Born outside US Strongly conservative Moderately conservative Middle of the road Moderately liberal Strongly liberal GOP Tea Party Identification A lot /some t at all/dk Born again Christian Q12a. Please tell me whether your opinion of the following Presidential candidates is favorable, unfavorable or whether you don t know enough about that person to have an opinion: Hillary Clinton, Democrat 8 386 414 156 128 114 187 215 697 98 114 91 323 11 151 124 77 184 616 Weighted 8 375 425 131 13 126 221 192 693 13 118 86 337 91 147 135 86 25 595 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 377 149 228 5 65 58 115 9 312 64 15 16 162 68 17 3 22 72 36 47.2% 39.7% 53.8% 38.2% 49.9% 45.7% 52.1% 46.8% 45.1% 62.2% 12.8% 18.7% 48.1% 74.% 73.% 2.4% 25.8% 35.% 51.4% UN 387 213 173 68 61 66 94 97 35 34 98 7 153 2 39 129 58 124 263 48.3% 56.8% 4.8% 52.% 46.9% 52.2% 42.6% 5.8% 5.6% 32.7% 82.5% 81.3% 45.3% 22.% 26.3% 95.9% 67.2% 6.6% 44.1% 36 13 23 13 4 3 12 5 3 5 6-22 4 1 2 6 9 27 4.5% 3.5% 5.4% 9.8% 3.3% 2.1% 5.3% 2.5% 4.4% 5.2% 4.7% - 6.6% 3.9%.8% 1.7% 6.9% 4.5% 4.5% born again, not born again Field Research Corporation Table 54 25

Q12a (Banner 3: Registered Voters Field Poll 216 H.S. graduat e or less Education Household Income Religion Marital Status Some college / trade school College graduat e Post graduat e work Under $2, $2, - $4, $4, - $6, $6, - $1, More than $1, Protestant / other Christian Catholi c religio n preference Married / t married living togethe r Widow/ separated/ divorce d Never marrie d Parent/ Guardian/ Grandparent of child under 18 Q12a. Please tell me whether your opinion of the following Presidential candidates is favorable, unfavorable or whether you don t know enough about that person to have an opinion: Hillary Clinton, Democrat 8 148 235 224 188 94 111 113 179 247 246 199 25 136 467 141 184 28 118 476 592 8 155 225 227 188 88 15 14 181 26 252 189 28 139 498 126 171 225 121 458 575 Weighted 1. 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1. 1. 1.% 1.% 1.% 1. 1. 1. 1. % % % % % % % 377 77 83 114 1 49 5 42 82 122 87 13 94 85 235 53 87 15 6 213 272 47.2% 49.4% 37.2% 5.3% 52.9% 56.1% 48.% 4.8% 45.4% 47.% 34.6% 54.4% 44.9% 61.3% 47.1% 41.9% 51.2% 46.9% 49.9% 46.5% 47.3% UNFAVORABL 387 71 126 13 84 33 48 58 91 128 151 78 15 49 25 65 69 112 58 218 274 E 48.3% 45.9% 56.2% 45.5% 44.7% 37.9% 46.3% 55.6% 5.1% 49.1% 59.9% 41.4% 5.5% 35.3% 5.2% 51.5% 4.2% 5.% 47.9% 47.7% 47.6% 36 7 15 9 4 5 6 4 8 1 14 8 1 5 13 8 15 7 3 27 29 4.5% 4.7% 6.7% 4.2% 2.4% 6.1% 5.7% 3.6% 4.5% 4.% 5.5% 4.2% 4.7% 3.3% 2.7% 6.5% 8.6% 3.1% 2.2% 5.8% 5.1% Parent Grandparent Neithe r n- Parent Field Research Corporation Table 55 26

Q12a (Banner 4: Registered Voters Field Poll 216 Own Tenure Union Affiliation Employment Status Rent / union HH nunion HH Employed t employed Dem Primary Preference GOP Primary Preference Obama job rating GOP 23 CA recall voter Clinton Sander Cruz Kasich Trump Approve Disapprove Schwarzenegger McClintock /other /Don't recall Didn't vote Financial well-being vs. last year Better change Worse off now /no off now opinion Q12a. Please tell me whether your opinion of the following Presidential candidates is favorable, unfavorable or whether you don t know enough about that person to have an opinion: Hillary Clinton, Democrat 8 475 316 179 615 464 336 169 183 45 29 67 488 284 66 37 43 199 16 95 8 496 299 188 66 475 325 172 166 53 29 78 47 31 75 41 49 19 11 1 Weighted 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 1.% 377 233 142 96 278 212 165 169 83 6 9-343 2 6 3 4 1 53 39 47.2% 47.1% 47.5% 51.1% 45.9% 44.6% 5.9% 98.% 49.6% 11.9% 31.6% - 72.8% 6.8% 8.6% 8.3% 8.9% 52.6% 48.% 38.4% 387 248 136 82 32 237 15 3 77 45 19 78 12 27 67 37 42 81 52 59 UN 48.3% 5.% 45.4% 43.5% 49.8% 49.8% 46.1% 1.6% 46.5% 84.2% 66.2% 1.% 21.7% 89.9% 89.6% 91.7% 86.9% 42.6% 47.1% 59.% 36 14 21 1 26 27 1 1 6 2 1-26 1 1-2 9 5 3 4.5% 2.9% 7.1% 5.4% 4.3% 5.6% 3.%.4% 3.9% 3.9% 2.2% - 5.4% 3.3% 1.8% - 4.2% 4.8% 5.% 2.6% Field Research Corporation Table 56 27