The True Cost of Justice in Marion County

Similar documents
Diverting Low-Risk Offenders From Florida Prisons A Presentation to the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Criminal and Civil Justice

NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE AND OSCEOLA COUNTIES, FLORIDA ORDER GOVERNING VETERANS COURT

A CITIZEN S GUIDE TO STRUCTURED SENTENCING

Assault and the Criminal Justice System. Alaska Criminal Justice Commission, presentation to ASHNHA

MISDEMEANOR SENTENCING STEPS FOR SENTENCING A MISDEMEANOR UNDER STRUCTURED SENTENCING

AMENDED ORDER GOVERNING THE MOVEMENT OF SELECTED INMATES INTO COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS PROGRAMS, OSCEOLA COUNTY

Criminal Justice A Brief Introduction

IC Chapter 16. Problem Solving Courts

County of Santa Clara Office of the District Attorney

Sentencing in Colorado

CAUSE NUMBER 00 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE COUNTY CRIMINAL V. COURT AT LAW NUMBER 00 DEFENDANT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

A CITIZEN S GUIDE TO STRUCTURED SENTENCING

Overcrowding Alternatives

IN THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA. ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER S (Supersedes Administrative Order S )

HOUSE BILL NO. HB0094. Sponsored by: Joint Judiciary Interim Committee A BILL. for. AN ACT relating to criminal justice; amending provisions

State Issue 1 The Neighborhood Safety, Drug Treatment, and Rehabilitation Amendment

PAROLE AND PROBATION VIOLATIONS

2014 Kansas Statutes

2012 Judicial Conference. Swift and Sure Sanctions Pilot Program (SSSP)

Evidence-Based Policy Planning for the Leon County Detention Center: Population Trends and Forecasts

Summit County Pre Trial Services

Senate Committee on Criminal Justice (515) THE NEED FOR PRETRIAL DIVERSION

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO ALACHUA COUNTY DRUG COURT

Session Law Creating the New Mexico Sentencing Commission, 2003 New Mexico Laws ch. 75

Testimony before the: Senate Judiciary Criminal Justice Committee

Louisiana Data Analysis Part 1: Prison Trends. Justice Reinvestment Task Force August 11, 2016

Case 4:03-cv DDD Document Filed 10/12/2005 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

State Court Processing of Domestic Violence Cases

Changing Directions. A Roadmap for Reforming Illinois Prison System JOHN HOWARD ASSOCIATION OF ILLINOIS

Policy Simulations of Alternative Options To Reduce the Orleans Parish Prison Ten-Year Projection

Santa Clara County, California Baseline and Alternative Jail Population Projections Report

Seek, Test, Treat and Retain for Criminal Justice Populations: Data Harmonization Measure

MICHIGAN PRISONERS, VIOLENT CRIME, AND PUBLIC SAFETY: A PROSECUTOR S REPORT. PAAM Corrections Committee. Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan

Diverting Low-Risk Offenders From Florida Prisons

Sacramento County Community Corrections Partnership

cook county state,s attorney DATA REPORT

List of Tables and Appendices

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE June 21, 2005 Session

Virginia s Nonviolent Offender Risk Assessment

Clerk Collection Best Practices

Who Is In Our State Prisons? From the Office of California State Senator George Runner

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR INDIAN RIVER, MARTIN, OKEECHOBEE, AND ST. LUCIE COUNTIES, STATE OF FLORIDA

OVERVIEW OF THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM. Laura Lothman Lambert Director, Juvenile Division

5. NAME (LAST, FIRST, MI.I.) 6. DOB 8. RACE 10. PRIMARY OFF. DATE 12. PLEA FELONY F.S.# DESCRIPTION OFFENSE POINTS

Warrants and Disposition Management Project. Allegheny Standardized Arrest Program (ASAP)

Assembly Bill No. 510 Select Committee on Corrections, Parole, and Probation

INTERSTATE COMPACT AND MISDEMEANOR CONVICTIONS BY TRACEY TURI 2014

Offender Population Forecasts. House Appropriations Public Safety Subcommittee January 19, 2012

Supreme Court of Florida

A Profile of Women Released Into Cook County Communities from Jail and Prison

CIRCUIT COURT William T. Newman, Jr. FY 2019 Proposed Budget - General Fund Expenditures

Jurisdiction Profile: Alabama

Assembly Bill No. 25 Committee on Corrections, Parole, and Probation

AB 109 and Prop 47 County Public Planning

Office Of The District Attorney

17th Circuit Court Kent County Courthouse 180 Ottawa Avenue NW, Grand Rapids, MI Phone: (616) Fax: (616)

Unintended Impacts of AB 109, Proposition 47 & 57

Technical Assistance. Local Reform in a Realigned Environment Data driven strategies to enhance public safety

Fort Worth ISD EMPLOYMENT REQUIREMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS CRIMINAL HISTORY AND CREDIT REPORTS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI DADE COUNTY. CASE NO (Court Administration)

Arkansas Current Incarceration Crisis

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

20 Questions for Delaware Attorney General Candidates

Total Test Questions: 100 Levels: Units of Credit: 0.50

Justice Reinvestment in Oklahoma. Detailed Analysis. October 17, Council of State Governments Justice Center

Administrative Order No Crim

MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2018

Winnebago County s Criminal Justice System: Trends and Issues Report

Who Is In Our State Prisons?

Massachusetts Sentencing Commission Current Statutes Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 211E 1-4 (2018)

SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

Felony Defendants in Large Urban Counties, 2000

FLORIDA CRIMINAL OFFENSES AMANDA POWERS SELLERS AND JENNA C. FINKELSTEIN

MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2017

Center for Criminal Justice Research, Policy & Practice: The Rise (and Partial Fall) of Illinois Prison Population. Research Brief

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO HOUSE BILL 3078

cook county state,s attorney 2017 DATA REPORT

Chester County Swift Alternative Violation Enforcement Supervision SAVE

Procrastinators Programs SM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA FIRST APPEARANCE DIVISION

Fairfield Municipal Court JOYCE A. CAMPBELL Judge. 675 Nilles Road Fairfield, Ohio Fax

Criminal Justice in the 21 st Century

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 522

Conditions of probation; evaluation and treatment; fees; effect of failure to abide by conditions; modification.

Alaska Data Analysis Part 1: Prison Drivers

CHAPTER 14 PUNISHMENT AND SENTENCING CHAPTER OUTLINE. I. Introduction. II. Sentencing Rationales. A. Retribution. B. Deterrence. C.

Correctional Population Forecasts

Types of Programs Fall Conference. Dispute Resolution Center (DRC)

COUNTY OF ORANGE. PRETRIAL RISK ASSESSMENT PAPER PILOT STUDY 1 RESULTS SUMMARY (Pretrial Supervision Meeting)

Criminal Justice Process

JAIL UTILIZATION PLAN

ALLEGAN COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY

ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOR DISPLACED DEFENDANTS. Institute for Court Management. ICM Fellows Program Court Project Phase.

Louisiana Justice Reinvestment Package

Sentencing Chronic Offenders

City and County of San Francisco. Office of the Controller City Services Auditor. City Services Benchmarking Report: Jail Population

Introduction. CJEC Estimated Prison Admissions Versus Actual Admissions* Number of Inmate Admissions 3,000 2,702 2,574 2,394 2,639 2,526 2,374

Pretrial Release of Felony Defendants, 1992

Supreme Court of Florida

Transcription:

The True Cost of Justice in Marion County

INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study was to gather data on the Marion County justice system and identify, if possible, new ways of solving problems within the system. Although there is much focus on the financial aspects of the system and the dollar cost savings that may be realized from some of the suggested solutions, the case studies contained in the report also identify the enormous social costs to both participants and the general citizenry of Marion County that result from existing policies and procedures.

At any given time approximately 1,500 individuals are housed in the Marion County Jail, approximately twice the population housed in the Lake County Jail. (Lake County is the most demographically comparable to Marion County within the Fifth Judicial Circuit).

Of those 1,500 individuals in the jail at any given time, almost 80% have been there before.

Within the inmate population, 60% were on some sort of medication. 55 inmates were responsible for almost 40% of the total medication costs due to HIV infections. 30% of the population was on psychotropic medications for mental health issues.

An Ocala Police Officer spends, on average, approximately 1.5 hours out of front line patrol duty to arrest, transport and complete the paperwork necessary to admit an individual into the Marion County Jail. Due to the size of the County and the expanded patrol areas, the average time for a Marion County Sherriff s Office Deputy to perform the same function is approximately 2.5 to 3 hours.

Police officers report that responding to mental disturbance calls create a significant burden on their departments.

All violation of probation warrants, even for technical violations, are issued on a no bond basis which requires arrest and confinement.

Most Marion County judges do not authorize other judge s to either change the bond requirements on warrants signed by them, or accept pleas for defendants on their docket. More flexible policies are in place in most Florida counties.

The average costs of an inmate in the Marion County Jail exclusive of medical costs are approximately $51.00 per day.

The total cost to run the jail for the 2012 2013 fiscal year was $28,980,831.83.

Marion County sends more people to prison on a per capita basis than any other county in the state and has an incarceration rate of 1.5 times the state average.

The average length of stay for a person charged with a felony in Marion County jail is 27 days longer (70%) than Lake County.

The most common crimes for which arrestees were booked into Marion County during 2013 were possession of drugs and possession of drug paraphernalia ( both felony and misdemeanor); theft; burglary; driving while license suspended; and driving under the influence, (54%) all of which are considered non-violent.

28% of all people with serious mental illness are likely to be arrested. The majority of these arrests are for non-violent charges like crimes against the public order or property offenses. Many experience repeat arrests.

Three Recommended Goals 1) Keep as many people out of the formal justice system as practical without compromising community safety. 2) Of those within the formal justice system, use the least intensive (expensive) supervision possible without compromising community safety and move those people through the system in the most efficient manner. 3) Create and implement strategies to prevent the people who have been in the justice system from returning to the formal system as a result of reoffending.

Solution: Pre-arrest diversion Create options other than formal arrest for patrol law enforcement officers to manage individuals who have mental health issues. An obstacle to implementation is cost of $500,000 to contract third party to run center that would assess, treat and refer offenders to services. Anticipated savings in arrest, processing and incarceration is $4,925,601.

Solution: Civil Citations and Notice to Appear Both Civil Citation and Notice to Appear programs are designed to divert people from the criminal justice system or expedite their processing within the system. The Civil Citation program focuses on people who have committed low level, non-violent offenses or are first time offenders. The program avoids the creation of an arrest record and saves significant patrol officer time. The Notice to Appear program is already in limited use in Marion County. The program technically qualifies as an arrest, rather then being booked in jail, defendants are required to appear in Court. The program saves significant patrol officer time.

Solution: Special administration for high cost inmates Almost all government and private medical insurance benefits terminate once an individual is incarcerated. These costs are then covered by local tax revenues budgeted to the Sheriff s Office Medical Budget. This program is designed to create an ongoing review of alternative supervision techniques such as ankle monitors for individuals that otherwise would be housed in the county jail. This an attempt to reduce the financial impact of these individuals on the medical budget of the Sherriff s Office.

Solution: Improved Judicial Administration Program would focus primarily on administrative techniques that have been demonstrated in other jurisdictions to reduce jail time, and make the best use of alternative court programs with a standardization of procedures. Formation of a rocket docket for plea acceptance hearings would dispose of cases where pleas has been negotiated. Recommended better use of the Veteran s court and Felony Drug Court by changing the qualification criteria as used in most other jurisdictions thereby expanding the use of these court alternatives. Suggesting a review of sentencing policy, VOP arrest warrant policies, and expanded judicial authority to accept pleas and alter bonds originally established in warrants is strongly suggested.

Solution: Inmate transition program Based on the success of this program in Duval County the study group recommends its implementation. The program assesses incarcerated individuals nearing release and works with them through a transition plan that begins before their release. Plans are based on education, rehabilitation services and on-going connections to services after release. Program could reduce the Marion County jail population by 40% resulting in cost savings approaching 10,000,000 per year.

THE CHALLENGE Ultimately, full implementation of some of the most impactful suggestions (jail and prison to community transition and pre-arrest diversion programs) will require courageous steps involving fundamental policy changes. They will require significant investment by local government in an effort to better our community as a whole. It is hoped that this study provides a rational foundation for those policy changes.

THE GOOD NEWS There are good signs that some of the effort by stakeholders is now directed to study group suggestions. The inmate review program is already in place; local law enforcement has embraced the civil citation program and is working on details for implementation; law enforcement is also committed to an expanded FTA program; and a misdemeanor drug court program has been started that embraces proven methodologies such as frequent court contact.

CONCLUSION Marion County s justice system is governed, in large part, by policies and decisions made by duly elected local government officials and constitutional officers. The system improvements suggested by the study team are largely aimed at the implementation of more efficient practices. The Study group recognizes that implementation of some of the recommendations involve significant policy changes. It is hoped that the study s frank assessment will provide a catalyst for a reexamination of some of those policies and procedures.