Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Similar documents
Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:15-cv-590 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No: 5:11-cv ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:15-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227

Case 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 09/12/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv JEI-KMW Document 1 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 2:18-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:13-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:99-mc Document 417 Filed 05/23/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 2:13-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 12/10/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/15/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 02/18/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:18-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 04/24/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 1:18-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/20/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:17-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 04/13/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 05/14/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 2:18-cv JJT Document 1 Filed 02/06/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Defendant.

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 123 Filed 03/09/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 842

Case 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/26/16 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:13-cv GMS Document 23 Filed 03/12/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 117 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/05/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) Plaintiff,

Case 2:16-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 1:15-cv WMS-LGF Document 54 Filed 11/01/16 Page 1 of 8. COMPLAINT Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:15-cv WMS

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

Case 2:13-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 03/15/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:16-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 03/11/14 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

Case 2:17-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 03/08/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 10/10/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 11/30/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

Case 2:15-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 07/10/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/01/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Case No. 3:13-cv N

Case 2:15-cv MJP Document 21 Filed 02/11/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No. v. COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case: 5:09-cv DDD Doc #: 1 Filed: 06/04/09 1 of 5. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case 2:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 44 Filed 06/15/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 457

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

Case 1:15-cv CW Document 2 Filed 01/16/15 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION

Case 6:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/31/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/17 Page 1 of 24 PageID #: 1

Case 1:17-cv RGS Document 1 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 4:10-cv Y Document 23 Filed 04/21/10 Page 1 of 8 PageID 156

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/31/17 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:1

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 11/06/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/26/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/24/10 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Case 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/28/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, RESTITUTION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Case 2:17-cv JRG Document 15 Filed 12/19/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 77

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-381 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:10-cv TJW Document 1 Filed 10/12/10 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 05/29/15 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

Case 1:11-cv LPS Document 14 Filed 01/30/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-50

Transcription:

Case 2:16-cv-01186-JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SPIN MASTER, LTD., Plaintiff, v. HELLODISCOUNTSTORE.COM, Defendant. Case No. 2:16-cv-1186 Jury Trial COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Spin Master, Ltd. ( Spin Master alleges and states its claims for relief against Defendant Hellodiscountstore.com ( Hello Discount as follows: PARTIES AND JURISDICTION 1. Spin Master is a Canadian corporation with its principal place of business located at 450 Front Street West, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5V 1B6. 2. On information and belief, Hello Discount is a California corporation having its principal place of business at 1527 Newton Street, Los Angeles, California 90021. 3. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338 for the reasons that this is an action arising under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. 101, et seq. 4. Hello Discount currently is offering for sale and selling at least the infringing Turning Mecard Transforming Robot Cart Toy Series Animation Alta and Phoenix ( Transforming Robots products, including, via its website, hellodiscountstore.com. Ex. A (Website.

Case 2:16-cv-01186-JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 2 of 8 PageID #: 2 5. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Hello Discount. On information and belief, Hello Discount also is subject to this Court s specific and general personal jurisdiction, pursuant to due process and/or the Texas Long Arm Statute, due at least to its substantial ongoing business activities in this forum, including regularly doing or soliciting business, engaging in other persistent courses of conduct, and/or deriving substantial revenue from goods and services provided to persons or entities in Texas and this District. On information and belief, Hello Discount maintains and operates a website on the Internet, hellodiscountstore.com, which is operational twenty-four (24 hours a day, seven days a week, and is accessible to and regularly accessed by residents of Texas and this District and other persons throughout the United States, and through which Hello Discount promotes and advertises its infringing products and directs consumers to purchase its infringing products. Hello Discount, through its website, has transacted business with customers throughout the United States, including customers within Texas and this District, and has advertised, promoted, sold, and shipped infringing products into this District without Spin Master s authorization or permission. Further, on information and belief, Hello Discount has derived revenue from interstate commerce and has interjected itself into Texas and this District by its operation of a commercial website whereby Hello Discount has sold, offered for sale, continued to sell, and continued to offer for sale infringing products in Texas and this District. Thus, this Court s exercise of jurisdiction over Hello Discount will not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice. 6. Venue is proper in the Eastern District of Texas under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b-(c and 1400(b. Upon information and belief, Hello Discount has transacted business in this District and has committed, and continues to commit, wrongful acts and acts of patent infringement in this District. 2

Case 2:16-cv-01186-JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 3 of 8 PageID #: 3 ALLEGATIONS COMMON TO ALL COUNTS 7. Spin Master was founded in 1994. Since that time, Spin Master has launched many notable toy products, including the Air Hogs products, launched in 1998. Between 2002-2007, Spin Master expanded its brand globally, allowing for the expansion of its licensing capabilities and relationship with entertainment companies. 8. In 2007, Spin Master launched Bakugan, a series of transforming robots which went on to become the most successful products in Spin Master s history. The Bakugan transforming robots were released in conjunction with a Japanese-Canadian anime series called Bakugan Battle Brawlers. 9. Following the success of the Bakugan transforming robots and anime series, Sonokong Co., Ltd. ( Sonokong released a knock-off version of the transformers, called Turning Mecard, along with its own anime series in South Korea. This knock-off brand includes the infringing Transforming Robot toys. 10. Since the launch of the Turning Mecard series, companies such as Hello Discount have sold the infringing Transforming Robot toys in the United States and in this District. COUNT I (INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,785,168 11. Spin Master incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 10 herein. 12. This cause of action arises under the patent laws of the United States of America and, in particular, 35 U.S.C. 271 et seq. 13. Spin Master is the assignee and owner of all U.S. Patent rights in U.S. Patent No. 7,785,168 ( the 168 Patent, with ownership of all substantial rights therein, including the right to exclude others from making, using, and selling the invention covered by the 168 patent, and 3

Case 2:16-cv-01186-JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 4 of 8 PageID #: 4 to sue and recover damages for the past, present, and future infringement thereof. A true and correct copy of the 168 Patent is attached as Ex. B. 14. The 168 Patent is valid, enforceable, and was duly issued in full compliance with Title 35 of the United States Code. 15. Hello Discount has directly infringed and continues to directly infringe the 168 Patent, including, for example, at least Claims 1, 4, and 7 of the 168 Patent by, among other things, using, offering for sale and/or selling its Transforming Robots. Hello Discount is thereby liable for infringement of the 168 Patent pursuant to at least 35 U.S.C. 271(a. 16. Attached as Ex. C, is a claim chart detailing, in an exemplary manner, how the Transforming Robots infringe at least Claims 1, 4, and 7 of the 168 Patent. The allegations set forth in Ex. C are incorporated herein by reference. 17. Spin Master has been harmed by this infringement and is entitled to compensation in an amount no less than a reasonable royalty as well as its lost profits for Hello Discount s infringement. 18. Spin Master has suffered irreparable harm as a result of this infringement due to, among other things, lost business opportunities, lost market share, and price erosion, and this harm cannot be remedied by monetary damages alone. Spin Master will seek a permanent injunction barring Hello Discount from using, offering to sell, and selling articles that infringe the 168 Patent, including its infringing Transforming Robots. COUNT II (INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,500,508 19. Spin Master incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 18 herein. 20. This cause of action arises under the patent laws of the United States of America, and, in particular, 35 U.S.C. 271 et seq. 4

Case 2:16-cv-01186-JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 5 of 8 PageID #: 5 21. Spin Master is the assignee and owner of all U.S. Patent rights in U.S. Patent No. 8,500,508 ( the 508 Patent, with ownership of all substantial rights therein, including the right to exclude others from making, using, and selling the invention covered by the 508 patent, and to sue and recover damages for the past, present, and future infringement thereof. A true and correct copy of the 508 Patent is attached as Ex. D. 22. The 508 Patent is valid, enforceable, and was duly issued in full compliance with Title 35 of the United States Code. 23. Hello Discount has directly infringed and continues to directly infringe the 508 Patent, including, for example, at least Claims 1-5 of the 508 Patent by, among other things, using, offering for sale and/or selling the Transforming Robots. Hello Discount is thereby liable for infringement of the 508 Patent pursuant to at least 35 U.S.C. 271(a. 24. Attached as Ex. E, is a claim chart detailing, in an exemplary manner, how the Transforming Robots infringes at least Claims 1-5 of the 508 Patent. The allegations set forth in Ex. E are incorporated herein by reference. 25. Spin Master has been harmed by this infringement and is entitled to compensation in an amount no less than a reasonable royalty as well as its lost profits for Hello Discount s infringement. 26. Spin Master has suffered irreparable harm as a result of this infringement due to, among other things, lost business opportunities, lost market share, and price erosion, and this harm cannot be remedied by monetary damages alone. Spin Master will seek a permanent injunction barring Hello Discount from using, offering to sell, and selling articles that infringe the 508 Patent, including its infringing Transforming Robots. 5

Case 2:16-cv-01186-JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 6 of 8 PageID #: 6 COUNT III (INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,306,504 27. Spin Master incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 26 herein. 28. This cause of action arises under the patent laws of the United States of America, and, in particular, 35 U.S.C. 271 et seq. 29. Spin Master is the exclusive licensee of U.S. Patent No. 7,306,504 ( the 504 Patent, with all substantial rights therein, including the right to exclude others from making, using, and selling the invention covered by the 504 patent, and to sue for the past, present, and future infringement thereof. Spin Master also has the right under 35 U.S.C. 313 to file the preliminary patent owner response and statement in any inter partes review proceeding relating to the 504 Patent or other Patent Office proceeding regarding the 504 Patent. A true and correct copy of the 504 Patent is attached as Ex. F. 30. The 504 Patent is valid, enforceable, and was duly issued in full compliance with Title 35 of the United States Code. 31. Hello Discount has directly infringed and continues to directly infringe the 504 Patent, including, for example, at least Claims 1 and 3-8 of the 504 Patent by, among other things, using, offering for sale and/or selling the Transforming Robots. Hello Discount is thereby liable for infringement of the 504 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271(a. 32. Attached as Ex. G, is a claim chart detailing, in an exemplary manner, how the Transforming Robots infringe at least Claims 1 and 3-8 of the 504 Patent. The allegations set forth in Ex. G are incorporated herein by reference. 33. Spin Master has been harmed by this infringement and is entitled to compensation in an amount no less than a reasonable royalty as well as its lost profits for Hello Discount s infringement. 6

Case 2:16-cv-01186-JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 7 of 8 PageID #: 7 34. Spin Master has suffered irreparable harm as a result of this infringement due to, among other things, lost business opportunities, lost market share, and price erosion, and this harm cannot be remedied by monetary damages alone. Spin Master will seek a permanent injunction barring Hello Discount from using, offering to sell, and selling articles that infringe the 504 Patent, including its infringing Transforming Robots. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Spin Master prays for: A. Judgment in favor of Spin Master that Hello Discount has infringed the 168 Patent, the 508 Patent, and the 504 Patent. B. Judgment in favor of Spin Master that the 168 Patent, the 508 Patent, and the 504 Patent are valid and enforceable. C. A permanent injunction enjoining Hello Discount, its officers, directors, agents, servants, affiliates, employees, divisions, branches, subsidiaries, parents, and all others acting in active concert or privity therewith from infringing the 168 Patent, the 508 Patent, and the 504 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 283. D. Judgment in favor of Spin Master for all damages suffered by Spin Master and that Hello Discount be ordered to account for and pay to Spin Master the damages resulting from Hello Discount s infringement of the 168 Patent, the 508 Patent, and the 504 Patent including lost profits, costs and expenses, together with pre-judgment and post-judgment interest thereon, and all other damages permitted pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284, including reasonable royalties and enhanced damages up to three times the amount of damages found or measured and costs, and in any event an amount no less than a reasonable royalty. E. Judgment and a determination to the effect that this case is exceptional pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285. 7

Case 2:16-cv-01186-JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 8 of 8 PageID #: 8 F. A judgment and order awarding Spin Master its attorneys fees and costs incurred herein pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285 and any other applicable provisions. G. A judgment and order that Spin Master be awarded any and all additional legal and equitable relief that the Court may deem just and proper under the circumstances. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Spin Master hereby respectfully requests a trial by jury on all issues in this action so triable by right pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dated: October 19, 2016 Respectfully submitted, ERISE IP, P.A. /s/ Megan J. Redmond Megan J. Redmond (21999 Erise IP, P.A. 6201 College Boulevard, Suite 300 Overland Park, KS 66211 (913 777-5600 telephone (913 777-5601 fax megan.redmond@eriseip.com Melissa Richards Smith GILLAM & SMITH, LLP 303 South Washington Avenue Marshall, TX 75670 Telephone: 903.934.8450 Facsimile: 903.934.9257 Melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF SPIN MASTER LTD. 8