%, # L. pswegl order. Facsimile: (310) Facsirnile: (310) ,.(.'2, SPIVAK LAW

Similar documents
"Uge EB JAN Daie Prodessod - By: %I, Y-.sT. wij ~1 ~

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:17-cv EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15

Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING YOUR ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION

Attorney for Plaintiffs Keith Iyon Wade and Vincent Espinoza UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ANTONIA CANO V. ABLE FREIGHT SERVICES, INC., ET AL. CASE NO. BC639763

Attorneys for BERKES CRANE ROBINSON & SEAL, LLP and the class of similarly situated persons SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST

Case 3:17-cv VC Document 88-1 Filed 04/12/18 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IMPORTANT PLEASE READ THIS CAREFULLY!

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. Berta Martin Del Campo v. Hometown Buffet, Inc., et al.

Case3:14-cv VC Document45 Filed01/12/15 Page1 of 43

CIV CIV DS ORDR Order GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION OVERVIEW OF YOUR RIGHTS AND OPTIONS UNDER THE SETTLEMENT

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CIV CIV DS MISC ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AND FINAL JUDGMENT filed

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS. Case No.:

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

vs. ) NOTICE OF RULING 14 )

PlainSite. Legal Document. Arizona District Court Case No. 4:11-cv Carreon v. Toyota Financial Services Corporation et al.

Jennifer Araiza, v. Farmers Insurance Exchange Superior Court of the State California, County of Riverside Case No. RIC

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/21/ :59 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 6 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/22/2017

Attorneys for Defendant and Respondent CITY OF ANAHEIM SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : : :

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,_. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT SPRING STREET COURTHOUSE

- 1 - Questions? Call:

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Case 4:15-cv JSW Document 82 Filed 09/01/17 Page 1 of 7

JOINT STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Case 2:06-cv AB-JC Document 797 Filed 10/13/17 Page 1 of 4 Page ID #:25126

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DECLARATION OF PLAINTIFF KURT CASADINE IN SUPPORT 17. Defendants.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Case No. BC Hon. Victoria Gerrard Chaney

Case 2:09-cv PSG-E Document Filed 11/03/17 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:7167

Case 2:07-cv TJH-CT Document 56 Filed 11/29/2007 Page 1 of 6

E-FILED 12/26/2017 4:20 PM FRESNO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT By: C. Cogburn, Deputy

Case 2:13-bk NB Doc 26 Filed 02/15/13 Entered 02/15/13 10:13:59 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT CLASS ACTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

$ Attorneys for Defendants PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY and 9 PG&E CORPORATION

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS, ANDREWS SPORTING GOODS, INC., DBA TURNER S OUTDOORSMAN, AND S.G. DISTRIBUTING, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

DEC 1 i1z ) FOR DEFENDANTS DEMURRER TO ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT ) ) Time: 439-pm.3) C.D. Michel -

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA

United States District Court Central District of California

NOTICE OF COLLECTIVE AND CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

Gk) AUo Superior Court of California CountY of Los Angeles. Sherri R. Carter, xecutive ofricer/clerk Deputv

~IE EIVIEIQ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S INJUNCTION AND

Case 2:14-cv JFW-AGR Document 1 Filed 06/10/14 Page 1 of 18 Page ID #:1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION I. BACKGROUND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT [CLASS ACTION]

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Case 7:18-cv CS Document 15 Filed 05/31/18 Page 1 of 23

If You Returned a Rented U-Haul Truck in California,

Case No. 2:12-CV GHK(MRW) [PROPOSED] PRELIMINARY APPROVAL ORDER. Hon. George H. King CASE NO. 2:12-CV GHK (MRW)

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 3:16-cv MEJ Document 1 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:18-cv R-AGR Document 7 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:26

Case 5:18-cv EJD Document 31 Filed 05/03/18 Page 1 of 14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IF YOU WORKED FOR ST. CHARLES HOME HEALTH BETWEEN MARCH 1, 2007 AND THE PRESENT,

2 STEPAN A. HAYTAYAN. 1 KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California

Currently before the Court for preliminary approval is a settlement (the

OBJECTION TO CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND APPROVAL OF ATTORNEYS FEES. COMES NOW, Bert Chapa, Objector, by and through counsel of record, files

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. This is a wage and hour class action filed by Plaintiff Mirta Williams ("Plaintiff"), on

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CLAIR COUNTY THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF ILLINOIS

EEOC & Wolansky v. United Healthcare of Florida, Inc.

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Please reply to: Joyia Z. Greenfield Zachariah R. Tomlin May 6, 2016

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

COURT APPROVED SETTLEMENT NOTICE AUTHORIZED BY THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

Case 2:06-cv AB-JC Document 799 Filed 10/13/17 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:25158

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CASE NO.:

Transcription:

a A %, # L David Spivak (SBN i74) david@,spivaklaw.com TFIE SPTVAK LAW FIRM 454 V/ilshire Boulevard, Suite 303 Beverly Hills, Califo rnia 0212 Telephone: (3I0) 4473A Facsirnile: (310) 4-473 i:i 5,*: r :*:* *:. *':-'':i:a ^'-:a'1''':t :.:.',.. i'li:,':!:r.^!i.! l!!n nl F;r4'r tit:e* it f:ti= l.iuu ".- LJtu i 'u L '.'' : q Inuis Benowitz (SBN 300) louis@benowitzlaw. com LAW OFFICES OF LOUIS BENOWITZ 454 Wilshire Bouievard, Penthouse Beverly Hills, Califo mia 0212 Telephone: (310)44-5141 Facsimile: (310) 42-405 :.r.". 4i ;;;i.il';'-lli'. g'-ifli\ t0 u Attomeys for Plaintiff, AARON AIAFA t2 IJ l4 15 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALTFORNIA FOR THF COUNTY OF TTILARE (UNLIMITE D JURIS D I C TI O N) lo 17 1 AARON ALAIA, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, vs. Case no.: VCU54 STIPULATION TO AMEND ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT; pswegl order z1 CUSTOM BTIILT PERSONAL TRAJNING, INC., a California corporation; and DOES 1-50. inclusive. Action Filed: Dept: December 30,2AII 2, Hon. David Mathias Defendants.,.(.'2, 2 Empbye iiahe Atbre,.s 454 \rvilshiie BI. -ie 303 Seveiy :{ilis CA 021? i31ci 4?-4730 Tei {3 10) 4-47-1 Fax SpitakLai.r-ccm Aaron Alafa v- Custonr Buik Personal Training, Inc., et ai Final Approval; fproposed] Order

I 2 3 4 5 1 ll Matthew A. Boyd (GA Bar No. 5324) (admitted pro hac vice) mboyd@hptylaw.com Ronald G. Polly, Jr. (GA Bar No. 02745) (admitted pro hac vice) RPolly@hptylaw.com Hawkins Parnell Thackston & Young LLP 4000 SunTrust Plaza 303 Peachtree Street NE Atlanta, Geor gi a 3 03 0-3 3 Telephone: (404)14-7400 Facsimile: (404\ 14-7500 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT Attorneys for Defendant, CUSTOM BUILT PERSONAL TRAINING" INC. t2 t3 l4 l5 l l7 l z5 2 27 2 Fnpioyee Rights Attom ys 454 Wilshiie B;. Sie 303 Eevei;\, ijills CA 0212 i31cj 4+-o-{;-30 Tei i31c) 4-473 Far SpilakLaw.(!trr Aaron Alafa v. Custom Built Personal Training, Inc., et al

STIPULATION 1. This is a wage and hour class action lawsuit. The parties entered into a Settlement Agreement and Release of Claims ("Settlement") in June of 13 with a Maximum Sefflement Amount of $50,000. To accommodate Defendant's strained financial condition, the parties agreed that (l) Defendant would have four years to fund the sefflement by making 7 il l2 l3 t4 l5 l T7 l 21 z5..,,,,=:,,,;,;. 2 t-, MM" WZI -qf 2g set payments at scheduled intervals and (2) any sums unclaimed by participating Class Members from the Maximum Distributable Amount would revert to Defendant. A true and correct copy of the Settlement is attached as Exhibit 1. 2. The Court gave final approval to this Settlement on April,14. Based on the participation in the Settlement, the Defendant is obligated to pay $5,.7 for a combination of Class Member sefflement shares of S3,333.33, Attorneys' Fees of $23,333.33, Litigation Expenses of $15,000, Claims Administration costs of $12,500, Enhancement Award to the Named Plaintiff of $,000, and Civil Penalties payable to the State of California of $7,500. 3. On approximately August 15, 14, Defendant began to make its payments. Thus far, Defendant has paid $1,77.1I toward the Settlement fund. An additional 547I,.5 remains to be paid. 4. Since the Court's Final Approval Order, the Defendant's financial condition has continued to deteriorate and it is no longer able to meet its funding obligations under the Settlement. 5. The parties have agreed, subject to court approval, to reduce by approximately 50% Defendant's financial obligation under the Settlement from 55,.7 to $304,77.I1 which Defendant shall have fully paid within 3 months of this Court's order on this stipulation. The $ 1,77. I 1 of the 5304,77.l1 already paid by Defendants leaves an unpaid settlement balance of $10,000. The effects of this reduction in the gross settlement amount are as follows: (1) the Class Counsel fees award will decrease to 4I%o from $23,333.33 to $115,53.11, and the portion of the settlement fund distributable to participating class members (settlement shares) will decrease to 52o/o from $3,333.34 to $131,340.00. The Empicyee *ith s Attorneys 454 Yr'ilsh;re Bl. S.te 303 Sereriv rlil:s CA 0212 i31 Gl 4-.1730 Tei i31l)i 4-473 Fax SpivakL?:w.<r:rrr Aaron Alafo v. Custom Built Personal Training, Inc., et al

Civil Penalties will decrease by 50% from $10,000 to $5,000 (with a payment to the State of California decreasing accordingly from $7,500 to $3,750). Claims Administration Costs will increase by 15% from $12,500 to $14,34. Litigation Expenses and Named Plaintiffs Enhancement Award will remain the same. A true and correct copy of this Amendment of the Settlement Agreement is attached as Exhibit 1 to this stipulation.. As explained above, the decrease in the payment to the participating class members is fair, adequate, and reasonable because of the change in Defendant's financial condition. Any further increase in the money allocated for distribution to participating class members would lead to reductions in attorney's fees, costs, administration costs, class representative enhancement award, and payment to the State that would be unreasonable, even under the circumstances of this change in the Settlement. 7. The decrease in the payment to the State of Califomia is fair, adequate, and reasonable because it approximately tracks the reduction in value of class member shares.. The decrease in the payment to Class Counsel is fair, adequate, and reasonable because the reduction is about ten percent (10%) greater than the reduction of Defendant's minimum payout from $5,.7 to 5304,77.I1, and twelve percent (12%) greater than the reduction in amount distributable to participating class members from $3,333.34 to $131,340.00. Class Counsel's attorney's fees at the time of the Plaintiffs Motion for Final z5 2 27 2 Approval totaled $113,01.4. As a result of Class Counsel's work on this case since the Motion for Final Approval, their fees have risen to over $12,000.00 under the lodestar method. A true and correct copy of the declaration of David Spivak ("DS") which shows this increase is attached as Exhibit 2 to this stipulation. ^See DS fl.. It is fair, adequate and reasonable that Class Counsel's litigation costs under the Amendment should remain the same. To date, Class Counsel's litigation costs are over $15,000.00, the amount the Court approved as fair, adequate, and reasonable in the original Final Approval Order. A true and correct copy of the declaration of David Spivak which shows this increase is attached as Exhibit 2 to this stipulation.,see DS fl 7, Exhibit A. 10. It is fair, adequate and reasonable that the Class Representative Enhancement E rplciiee RighE Attotne.vs 454 \ryilshiie Bi. Ste 303 3everjv Hilis CA 021? i31cj 4?-.1r-30 Tel i310) 4-473 Fax Spivakbir.ccrrr v. Custom Built Personal Training, Inc., et al

Award under the Amendment should remain the same because the Court already approved this amount, and Plaintiff had dedicated further time and energy to the administration and restructuring of this Settlement for the benefit of the Participating Class Members and because 4 5 he must wait three more years to receive the same amount that Defendant offered him seffle his claims (at the expense of the Class's claims) at the mediation of this maffer in January of 13. 7 ll 12 l3 t4 l5 t T7 1 23 27 2 1 l. The increase in the Claims Administration costs is fair, adequate, and reasonable because it accounts for actual increased costs to Simpluris, Inc. attendant to distribution of notice of the Amendment to participating class members by means of a postcard and webpage that will make the Amendment, the new Class Notice, and the Amended Final Order and Judgment available for downloail and review by participating class members. ^See DS 1T, Exhibit B regarding Simpluris, Inc.'s bid in the amount of $14,34.00. The increase is also fair, adequate and reasonable because it is within the amount the Court preliminarily approved for Claims Administration, $,000.00. See DS tt, Exhibit C. 12. Within 10 days of the Order on this Stipulation, the Claims Administrator will notif'the participating class members in writing of this change to the Settlement by means of a postcard. ^See DS 1T 11, Exhibit D. The postcard will expressly advise each participating class member of the change in his Settlement Award and of the address of a webpage that will provide class members with the Notice of Amendment to Settlement Agreement and the Final Order Approving the Amendment (should it be issued). ^See DS fl 11, Exhibit D (postcard) and Exhibit E (Notice of Amendment to Settlement Agreement). The class members will have 45 days to object or opt out of the settlement in the same manner that they could have previously under the seftlement. However, they may only object or opt out based upon this change in the Settlement Amount. They may not opt out of the original Settlement if they did not timely do so before. 13. This method of notifring participating class members of the Amendment is fair, adequate and reasonable because it advises them of the changes to the Settlement and provides them with means to stay informed of this Court's future orders on this.stipulation and the E npic)jee Ri{hts Attorie}s 454 Wilshi.e Bi. Sie 303 Seveiiy.lilis CA 021? i310j 4-4730 Ter i310) 4-473 Faxr SpivekLna.ccrn Aaron Alafav. Custom Built Personal Training, Inc., et al Final Approval; [hoposed] Order

& ff I Amendment. It is also an inexpensive method of notice designed to keep costs down so further 1 dirninution in class rlember awards is not necessary. There is no need to provide notice of the 3 Amendment to those class members rvho opted out or chose not to nrake a clairn on the Settlernent originally because their rights r.vill not be affected by the Amendment, The only 5 circumstances that have changed are the financial condition of the Defendant for the worse. 14' The Court will conduet a hearing on whether to give final approval to this 7 amendment on August.2aI at :30 a.m.> or any subsequent date as m.ay be convenient to the Court. IT IS SO STIPULATED. II tz I Dated: '-7 I Z,.zot t3 t4 '15 l I7 t e, Dated: Jg.'_lS _! - *, Z0t Attomeys for Plaintiff, AARON ALAFA HAWKINS PARNELL I'I I"{GT{SON & YOL NG LLP.*-1---,1i'4'*". Br MA Afforneys for Defendanl CUSTOM BUILT PERSONAL TRAINING, inc. LI aa Based upon the agreement of the parties as set forth in the foregoing stipulatiol, and good cause lraving been shown, a hearing is set for Wqrqf a{,1 AA ll a<,..: :-',.; '.;j W"l* at :30 a.m. in Department 2 regarding whethel to give,h uooroual to this amendment. The parties may appear by Courtcall for the hearing. Dated: IT IS SO ORDERED. Ati* * 5 :*T$ David C. Mathias HON. DAVID MATHIAS Tulare County Superior Court Judge Entplayee Rights AftomerE {54 \Mlshirc e,t. StG 3O3 Beverly Hrlls CA?0212 (3101 {-{730 Tel. (3tO) 4-{73 Fai SpekLts (q' ttaron Alafq v. (:ustom Built persondl Training, In.-, a a Stipulation to Amencl Order CEnting