IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. When adopting the Title 20 Rules governing the Maryland

Similar documents
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. This Court s Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. This Court s Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and

July 29, Re: Supplement to the One Hundred Sixty-Second Report of the Rules Committee

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND ORDER APPROVING CHANGE TO THE JURY PLAN FOR CALVERT COUNTY

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. This Court s Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and

STANDING COMMITTEE ON RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULES CHANGES. The Rules Committee has submitted its One Hundred Seventy-

Attorney Grievance Commission, et al. v. Ty Clevenger, No. 64, September Term, 2017

Appellate Practice: The Clerk s Perspective An unweighted top ten

SCRU IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I. In the Matter of the Amendment of the HAWAI'I RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE

Maryland Judiciary. Annual Statistical Abstract

STANDING COMMITTEE ON RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULES CHANGES. The Rules Committee has submitted its One Hundred Seventy-

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STANDING COMMITTEE ON RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULES CHANGES. The Rules Committee has submitted its One Hundred Ninety-

Analysis of Case Processing Performance in the Court of Special Appeals

Rule Change #1998(14)

A The following shall be assigned to the appellate division:

State v. Camper, September Term 2008, No. 82

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Administrative Order Gen

Supreme Court of Florida

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. Misc. Docket AG. No. 28. September Term, 2008 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND

A Guide for SelfRepresentation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND R U L E S O R D E R. This Court s Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and

HEADNOTE: Marwani v. Catering By Uptown, No. 79, September Term, 2008

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

Damar Brown v. State of Maryland, No. 74, September Term, Opinion by Getty, J.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Administrative Order Gen

CHAPTER 33. BUSINESS OF THE SUPREME COURT IN GENERAL ORIGINAL MATTERS Applications for Leave to File Original Process. KING S BENCH MATTERS

Raynor Associates L.P. v. Baltimore Door and Frame Company, Inc. No. 62, Sept. Term, 1999

Petitioners, * COURT OF APPEALS. v. * OF MARYLAND. MARIROSE JOAN CAPOZZI, et al., * September Term, Respondents. * Petition Docket No.

Supreme Court of Florida

WHEREAS, the Appellate Division seeks to adopt various procedures which are currently in use in the Third District Court of Appeal; and

HEADNOTE: Criminal Law & Procedure Jury Verdicts Hearkening the Verdict

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. Misc. Docket AG No. 23. September Term, 2009 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND BARRY KENT DOWNEY

Kenneth Martin Stachowski, Jr. v. State of Maryland, No. 55, September Term, 2007.

MARYLAND JUDICIAL COUNCIL

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Proposed Rules Changes. ACTION: Notice of Proposed Changes to the Rules of Practice and Procedure of

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Attorney Grievance Comm n v. Andrew Ndubisi Ucheomumu, Misc. Docket AG No. 58, September Term, 2016

The Court Refuses to Honor my Notice of Appeal! What do I do now!?! 1

APPENDIX C M E M O R A N D U M FROM: Advance Authorization for Investigative, Expert or Other Services. Case Name & Designation.

Procedure for Adjusting Grievances

Florida Rules for Certified and Court-Appointed Mediators. Part I. Mediator Qualifications

PETITIONS FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No. 41 September Term, 2010 MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE MARYLAND STATE CONFERENCE OF NAACP BRANCHES

Johnson, Doris v. Western Express

Supreme Court Electronic Filing System

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

THE COURTS. Title 210 APPELLATE PROCEDURE

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court. Betty Fisher, on behalf of the estate of Alice Shaw- Baker, Petitioner,

THE JOINT RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE FOR COURTS OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

In the Circuit Court for Carroll County Case No. C IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No. 21. September Term, 2004

Attorney Grievance: assisting suspended lawyer in engaging in unauthorized practice of law.

UNDERSTANDING THE APPELLATE PROCESS IN THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

New York City Department of Consumer Affairs. Notice of Adoption of Rule

CONFERENCE OF ORPHANS COURT JUDGES

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Gregory Hall, et al. v. Prince George s County Democratic Central Committee, No. 100, September Term 2012.

3RD CIRCUIT LOCAL APPELLATE RULES Proposed amendments Page 1

HEADNOTE: Stalker Brothers, Inc., et al. v. Alcoa Concrete Masonry, Inc., No. 57, September Term, 2010

RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULE 2:9. MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS PENDING APPEAL

FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS CLERK OF COURT UPDATE AGENDA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. Misc. Docket AG NO. 14 SEPTEMBER TERM, 2005 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND SEAN W.

Dwayne Roberts appeals an order denying petitions for writ of mandamus in

assignment calendar and should be referred to when holidays and judicial conferences arise. COUNTY DIVISION ASSIGNMENTS FOR ALACHUA COUNTY

SCRU IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I. In the Matter of the HAWAI I RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE ORDER AMENDING RULES OF THE

MARYLAND JUDICIAL COUNCIL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS ORDER OF THE COURT

Maryland State Board of Elections v. Libertarian Party of Maryland, et al. No. 79, September Term 2011, Opinion by Greene, J.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Proposed Changes to the Rules of Practice. Federal Circuit Rule 1

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ORDER

June 19, 2015 PROPOSED REVISIONS TO LOCAL COURT RULES

Falls Road Community Association, Inc., et al. v. Baltimore County, Maryland, et al. No. 39, September Term 2012

Department of Defense INSTRUCTION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

VIRGIN ISLANDS SUPREME COURT RULES (as amended November 2, 2011)

UNREPORTED OPINION. From 2010 to 2014, James Fitzgerald was the Sheriff of Howard County. 1 In the

Part 3 Rules for Providing Legal Representation in Non- Capital Criminal Appeals and Non-Criminal Appeals

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No. 11. September Term, 2002 BARRY A. JACOBSON SOL LEVINSON & BROS., INC.

Munyan, Bart C. v. PCL Industrial Construction Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE TABLE OF CONTENTS

Circuit Court for Baltimore City Case No.: 24-C UNREPORTED

FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE

Strategic Plan for the Maryland Judiciary moving justice forward

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2011

[Additions to the text are indicated in underlining and deleted text is shown by strikeover.]

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

[The present language is amended as indicated below by underlining for new text and strikeover for text that has been deleted.]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC

PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY

Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila EN BANC THE RULE ON THE WRIT OF HABEAS DATA RESOLUTION

COURT OF APPEALS STANDING COMMITTEE ON RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE. Minutes of a meeting of the Rules Committee held in Room 1100A,

NOTICE IS GIVEN that Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/ Petitioner

PRELIMINARY DRAFT OF Proposed Amendments to the Federal Rules of Appellate, Bankruptcy, Civil, and Criminal Procedure

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA NO:SC STEVE LYNCH, Petitioner, 477 DCA CASE NO: 3D1-61 Vs. L.T. CASE NO: C

CHAPTER 24 APPEALS. This chapter covers some of the basic requirements for appeals, including:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

Drafting and Issuing Discovery Subpoenas: Maryland

Transcription:

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND R U L E S O R D E R When adopting the Title 20 Rules governing the Maryland Electronic Courts (MDEC) case management and e-filing system in May 2013, this Court recognized that, notwithstanding the careful work that had gone into the development of those Rules, MDEC would constitute a major and dramatic shift in the operations and procedures in both the trial and appellate courts of the State, that it was highly complex, that some changes in the initial Rules likely would be necessary based on actual experience when the new system was implemented, and that, in order to lessen confusion and avoid disruptions, some of those changes might have to be made very quickly. The implementation of MDEC commenced on October 14, 2014 in the District and Circuit Courts in Anne Arundel County. Pursuant to Rule 20-102 (b), the Rules in Chapter 400 of Title 20 therefore apply to appellate proceedings in the Court of Appeals and Court of Special Appeals commenced on or after that date that seek review of orders or judgments entered in -1-

those courts in Anne Arundel County. In addition, this Court has decided to apply the Rules in Chapter 400 of Title 20 to proceedings invoking the original jurisdiction of the Court, including proceedings emanating from the Attorney Grievance Commission and the Commission on Judicial Disabilities. A number of issues quickly arose regarding how, in particular circumstances, the Rules in Chapter 400 of Title 20, governing these appellate and special proceedings, applied. Some of those issues, not requiring any change in the Rules, were addressed by a clarifying Notice posted on the Judiciary Website. Several, however, require immediate amendments to Rule 20-405 and a new Rule 20-406. The Court has consulted with the Chair of its Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure but has decided that, due to the exigent circumstances, it needs to act immediately on its own initiative. The Court, having considered at an open meeting, notice of which was posted as prescribed by law, the Rules changes attached to this Order and any comments received with respect to them, and finding that an emergency exists with reference to those Rules th changes, it is this 6 day of November, 2014, -2-

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that amendments to Rule 20-405 and new Rule 20-406 be, and they are hereby, adopted in the form attached to this Order; and it is further ORDERED, that the Rules changes hereby adopted shall take effect on November 7, 2014 at 12:01 a.m. and shall govern the courts of this State and all parties and their attorneys in all actions and proceedings to which those Rules apply from and after that date and time; and it is further -3-

ORDERED, that a copy of this Order be posted promptly on the website of the Maryland Judiciary. /s/ Mary Ellen Barbera Mary Ellen Barbera /s/ Glenn T. Harrell, Jr. Glenn T. Harrell, Jr. /s/ Lynne A. Battaglia Lynne A. Battaglia /s/ Clayton Greene, Jr. Clayton Greene, Jr. /s/ Sally D. Adkins Sally D. Adkins /s/ Robert N. McDonald Robert N. McDonald /s/ Shirley M. Watts Shirley M. Watts Filed: November 6, 2014 /s/ Bessie M. Decker Clerk Court of Appeals of Maryland -4-

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE TITLE 20 - ELECTRONIC FILING AND CASE MANAGEMENT CHAPTER 400 - APPELLATE REVIEW AMEND Rule 20-405 to specify certain electronically filed submissions as to which eight paper copies also are required to be filed, as follows: Rule 20-405. OTHER SUBMISSIONS (a) Applicability This Rule applies to a document filed in an appellate court that is not a brief, record extract, or appendix. (b) Electronic Filing Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, a submission by an attorney, a self-represented litigant who is a registered user, the Court, a judge of the Court, or a Clerk in an affected action shall be filed electronically. (c) Paper Copies Required from Persons who File Electronically An attorney or self-represented litigant other registered user who files a submission any of the following submissions electronically also shall file eight copies of the submission in paper form.: (1) a petition for certiorari to the Court of Appeals or a response to the petition; (2) a petition to the Court of Appeals for a writ of mandamus, a writ of prohibition, or other extraordinary relief or -5-

a response to the petition; (3) a motion for reconsideration filed pursuant to Rule 8-605 or a response to the motion; (4) in an attorney grievance matter, (A) exceptions filed in the Court of Appeals pursuant to Rule 16-758 or a response to the exceptions, (B) recommendations concerning the appropriate disposition of a matter under Rule 16-759 (c) or a response to the recommendations, (C) a petition filed in the Court of Appeals under Rule 16-771, 16-773, 16-774 (b), or 16-781 or a response to the petition, (D) an application filed in the Court of Appeals pursuant to Rule 16-775 (a) or a response to the application; (5) in a matter reaching the Court of Appeals from the Commission on Judicial Disabilities, (A) exceptions filed in the Court of Appeals to the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the Commission pursuant to Rule 16-809 or a response to the exceptions, or (B) an agreement to discipline by consent filed in the Court of Appeals pursuant to Rule 16-808 (l); or (6) any other petition filed in the Court of Appeals invoking the original jurisdiction of that Court or a response to the petition. (d) Service of Submissions Filed Electronically Service of an electronically filed submission shall be made in accordance with Rule 20-205 (d). (e) Persons who do not File Electronically A person who is not required to file electronically and files a document in paper form shall file and serve the number of -6-

paper copies required by Title 8 of these Rules. Source: This Rule is new. -7-

MARYLAND RULES OF PROCEDURE TITLE 20 - ELECTRONIC FILING AND CASE MANAGEMENT CHAPTER 400 - APPELLATE REVIEW ADD new Rule 20-406, as follows: Rule 20-406. TIME FOR FILING SUBMISSIONS (a) Electronic Submissions (1) Generally An electronic submission shall be filed within the time allowed by the applicable Rule in Title 8. Filing (2) Where Paper Copies Required in Addition to the Electronic Where, under Rules 20-403 (b), 20-404 (b), or 20-405 (c), a submission is required to be filed both electronically and in paper form, the submission shall be deemed to be filed timely if (A) the electronic submission is filed within the time allowed by the applicable Rule in Title 8, and (B) the paper copies are mailed, delivered to a third-party commercial carrier, or delivered to the clerk s office on the next business day. Committee note: If a submission is required to be filed both electronically and in paper form, the paper copies must be timely filed under this Rule and be identical in all respects to the electronic submission. No additions, deletions, or other changes are permitted. A failure to timely file the electronic submission or the required number of paper copies identical to the submission may result in the submission being stricken. (b) Submissions Solely in Paper Form A submission properly filed solely in paper form shall be -8-

filed within the time allowed by the applicable Rule in Title 8. Source: This Rule is new. -9-