INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA TRIBUNAL INTERNATIONAL DU DROIT DE LA MER. Press Release

Similar documents
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE PAIK

INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA

Article 1. Article 2. Article 3. Article 4

INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA

May 11, By: Nigel Bankes

The Legal Status of the Outer Continental Shelf without a Recommendation from the CLCS UNIVERSITY OF SHIZUOKA SHIZUKA SAKAMAKI

MARITIME BOUNDARY DISPUTES AND ARTICLE 298 OF UNCLOS. Christine Sim 24 August 2017

This article from Hague Justice Journal is published by Eleven international publishing and made available to anonieme bezoeker

TREATY BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO AND GRENADA ON THE DELIMITATION OF MARINE AND SUBMARINE AREAS

IN THE HON BLE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE, HEGUE IN THE MATTER OF (AEGEAN SEA CONTINENTAL SHELF CASE) GREECE... APPELLANT TURKEY...

INTERNATIONAL TERRITORIAL DISPUTES AND CONFRONTATIONS IN THE SOUTH CHINA SEA FROM A LEGAL PERSPECTIVE

2013 No CONTINENTAL SHELF. The Continental Shelf (Designation of Areas) Order 2013

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE HEIDAR

SUBMISSION by. Government of the Republic of Côte d Ivoire. for the

Tokyo, February 2015

page 1 Delimitation Treaties Infobase accessed on 22/03/2002

TOF WHITE PAPER - SECTION re EXTENDED CONTINENTAL SHELF

PCA PRESS RELEASE ARBITRATION BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA AND THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA

Alex G. Oude Elferink

INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA TRIBUNAL INTERNATIONAL DU DROIT DE LA MER

Issue 3 ISSN

} { THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES MESSAGE AGREEMENT WITH THE UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS ON THE MARITIME BOUNDARY

DECREES. On the basis of the report of the Minister for Foreign Affairs,

page 1 Delimitation Treaties Infobase accessed on 14/03/2002 DOALOS/OLA - UNITED NATIONS

The Future of UNCLOS Dispute Settlement: Select Issues in the Light of Philippines v China. Iceland 29 June 2018 Dr Kate Parlett

Meeting of States Parties

Annex I to the Rules of Procedure of the Commission: Solution to a Problem or Problem without a Solution?

INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA YEAR December 2012 THE ARA LIBERTAD CASE. (ARGENTINA v. GHANA)

Summary Not an official document. Summary 2017/1 2 February Maritime Delimitation in the Indian Ocean (Somalia v. Kenya)

Disputed Areas in the South China Sea

INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA

Game Changer in the Maritime Disputes

REPORTS OF JUDGMENTS, ADVISORY OPINIONS AND ORDERS

In its Judgment, which is final and without appeal, the Court

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A PARTIAL SUBMISSION OF DATA AND INFORMATION ON THE OUTER LIMITS OF THE CONTINENTAL SHELF OF THE

INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA REPORTS OF JUDGMENTS, ADVISORY OPINIONS AND ORDERS

Submarine Cables & Pipelines under UNCLOS

AFFAIRE RELATIVE À LA DÉLIMITATION MARITIME EN MER NOIRE. (ROUMANIE c. UKRAINE) CASE CONCERNING MARITIME DELIMITATION IN THE BLACK SEA

PCA Case Nº IN THE MATTER OF THE ARCTIC SUNRISE ARBITRATION. - before -

ITLOS at 20: Impacts of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea Roundtable organised by the London Centre of International Law Practice

Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 163 / Wednesday, August 23, 1995 / Notices

The Belt and Road Initiative: The China-Philippines relation in the South China Sea beyond the Arbitration

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF GHANA

Republic of Korea PARTIAL SUBMISSION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA TRIBUNAL INTERNATIONAL DU DROIT DE LA MER Press Release (Issued by the Registry)

THE PHILIPPINE BASELINES LAW

Tara Davenport Research Fellow Centre for International Law

Dili international conference: maritime boundaries and the Law of the Sea

PART FOUR. Legal questions

International Environmental Law JUS 5520

CONVENTION ON THE CONTINENTAL SHELF

MIXING OIL AND WATER: THE ROLE OF NATURAL RESOURCE WEALTH IN THE RESOLUTION OF THE MARITIME BOUNDARY DISPUTE BETWEEN GHANA AND CÔTE D IVOIRE

INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THE LAW OF THE SEA. The Rule of Law in the Seas of Asia: Navigational Chart for the Peace and Stability

A Brief of Cambodia s Claims to Baselines and Maritime Zones By: Dany Channraksmeychhoukroth* (Aug 2015)

Instrument of Modification of Joint Boundaries

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE BOUGUETAIA

INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA

INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA

LAND AND MARITIME BOUNDARY (CAMEROON v. NIGERIA) 141 ILR 1

Seminar on the Establishment of the Outer Limits of the Continental Shelf beyond 200 Nautical Miles under UNCLOS (Feb. 27, 2008)

[Translation by the Registry]

Observers Report. 28th Meeting of the States Parties to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea

DSM: international and national law. Hannah Lily Legal Advisor, Deep Sea Minerals Project, SPC (SOPAC Division) Rarotonga, 13 May 2014

Maritime Zones Act, 1999 (Act No. 2 of 1999) PART I PRELIMINARY

FIFTH REGULAR SESSION, 2016 C.B. NO A BILL FOR AN ACT

Agreement for cooperation in dealing with pollution of the North Sea by oil and other harmful substances, 1983

Hatton Rockall Area. Executive Summary

We Beatrix, by the grace of God Queen of the Netherlands, Princess of Orange-Nassau, etc., etc., etc.

Does the conduct of data collection for navigation and military purposes by a

UNCLOS INSTITUTIONS AND THEIR ROLES HELMUT TUERK*

UNITED NATIONS HEADQUARTERS, NEW YORK SEPTEMBER 2002

The Disputes in the South China Sea -From the Perspective of International Law 1. The essence of the disputes in the South China Sea

The Demise of Equitable Principles and the Rise of Relevant Circumstances in Maritime Boundary Delimitation

Basic Maritime Zones. Scope. Maritime Zones. Internal Waters (UNCLOS Art. 8) Territorial Sea and Contiguous Zone

VIOLATIONS ALLÉGUÉES DE DROITS SOUVERAINS ET D ESPACES MARITIMES DANS LA MER DES CARAÏBES

INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA

INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA TRIBUNAL INTERNATIONAL DU DROIT DE LA MER

Federal Law No. 19 of 1993 in respect of the delimitation of the maritime zones of the United Arab Emirates, 17 October 1993

Yan YAN, National Institute for South China Sea Studies, China. Draft Paper --Not for citation and circulation

Implementing UNCLOS: Legislative and Institutional Aspects at a National Level

Some legal aspects of the drilling rig incident in the South China Sea in

Indonesia s Delimited Maritime Boundaries

Geopolitics, International Law and the South China Sea

Challenges of Maritime Security Strategy in the Indian Ocean: A Maritime Boundary Perspective

The Government of the Republic of INDIA AND

Unit 3 (under construction) Law of the Sea

Defining EEZ claims from islands: A potential South China Sea change

INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA REPORTS OF JUDGMENTS, ADVISORY OPINIONS AND ORDERS

No Authentic texts: Danish and German. Registered by Denmark on 21 February 1973.

Report of AALCO s Forty-Fifth Session: New Delhi (HQ), 2006

The Rule of Law in the Seas of Asia - Navigational Chart for Peace and Stability -

INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA

The Chagos UNCLOS Arbitration: Maritime, Fishing and Human Rights Issues and General International Law Anthony E Cassimatis

Whose Side Is It On? The Boundaries Dispute in the North Malacca Strait

PROPOSALS FROM THE FACILITATORS

Policy Recommendation for South Korea s Middle Power Diplomacy: Maritime Security Policy

The Association of the Bar of the City of New York

STATEMENT BY JUDGE HUGO CAMINOS, OBSERVER OF THE INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA.

[Translation by the Registry] DISSENTING OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT BOUGUETAIA

TOPIC TWO: SOURCES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW

Transcription:

INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA TRIBUNAL INTERNATIONAL DU DROIT DE LA MER Press Release DISPUTE CONCERNING DELIMITATION OF THE MARITIME BOUNDARY BETWEEN GHANA AND CÔTE D'IVOIRE SPECIAL CHAMBER DELIVERS ITS JUDGMENT ON 23 SEPTEMBER 2017 At a public sitting held today, the Special Chamber of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, constituted to deal with the Dispute concerning delimitation of the maritime boundary between Ghana and Côte d'ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean (Ghana/Côte d'ivoire), delivered its Judgment. The Judgment was read by Judge Boualem Bouguetaia, President of the Special Chamber. Procedure The dispute was submitted to a special chamber formed in application of article 15, paragraph 2, of the Statute of the Tribunal by way of a special agreement concluded between the two States concerned on 3 December 2014. On 25 April 2015, the Special Chamber delivered its Order on a request for the prescription of provisional measures filed by Côte d Ivoire. Further to the closure of the written proceedings, hearings on the merits of the case took place from 6 to 16 February 2017. Final submissions of the Parties In its final submissions, Ghana requests the Special Chamber to adjudge and declare that: 1) Ghana and Côte d Ivoire have mutually recognised, agreed, and applied an equidistance-based maritime boundary in the territorial sea, EEZ and continental shelf within 200 M. 2) The maritime boundary in the continental shelf beyond 200 M follows an extended equidistance boundary along the same azimuth as the boundary within 200 M, to the limit of national jurisdiction. 3) In accordance with international law, by reason of its representations and upon which Ghana has placed reliance, Côte d Ivoire is estopped from objecting to the agreed maritime boundary.

2 4) The land boundary terminus and starting point for the agreed maritime boundary is at Boundary pillar 55 (BP 55). 5) As per the Parties agreement in December 2013, the geographic coordinates of BP 55 are 05 05 28.4 N and 03 06 21.8 W (in WGS 1984 datum). 6) Consequently, the maritime boundary between Ghana and Côte d Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean starts at BP 55, connects to the customary equidistance boundary mutually agreed by the Parties at the outer limit of the territorial sea, and then follows the agreed boundary to a distance of 200 M. Beyond 200 M, the boundary continues along the same azimuth to the limit of national jurisdiction. The boundary line connects the following points, using loxodromes (the geographic coordinates are in WGS 1984 datum): Point Latitude Longitude CEB-1 (LBT) 05 05 28.4 N 03 06 21.8 W CEB-2 04 53 39 N 03 09 18 W CEB-3 04 47 35 N 03 10 35 W CEB-4 04 25 54 N 03 14 53 W CEB-5 04 04 59 N 03 19 02 W CEB-6 03 40 13 N 03 23 51 W CEB-7 (200 M) 01 48 30 N 03 47 18 W CEB-8 (Limit of National Jurisdiction) 01 04 43 N 03 56 29 W 7) Côte d Ivoire s claim alleging violation of the Special Chamber s Order of 25 April 2015 is rejected. 8) Côte d Ivoire s claim alleging violation of Article 83 of UNCLOS and Côte d Ivoire s sovereign rights is rejected. In its final submissions, Côte d Ivoire requests the Special Chamber to reject all Ghana s requests and claims, and: (1) to declare and adjudge that the sole maritime boundary between Ghana and Côte d Ivoire follows the 168.7º azimuth line, which starts at boundary post 55 and extends to the outer limit of the Ivorian continental shelf;

3 (2) to declare and adjudge that the activities undertaken unilaterally by Ghana in the Ivorian maritime area constitute a violation of: (i) the exclusive sovereign rights of Côte d Ivoire over its continental shelf, as delimited by this Chamber; (ii) the obligation to negotiate in good faith, pursuant to article 83, paragraph 1, of UNCLOS and customary law; (iii) the obligation not to jeopardize or hamper the conclusion of an agreement, as provided for by article 83, paragraph 3, of UNCLOS; and (3) to declare and adjudge that Ghana has violated the provisional measures prescribed by this Chamber by its Order of 25 April 2015; (4) and consequently: (a) (b) to invite the Parties to carry out negotiations in order to reach agreement on the terms of the reparation due to Côte d Ivoire, and to state that, if they fail to reach an agreement within a period of 6 months as from the date of the Judgment to be delivered by the Special Chamber, said Chamber will determine those terms of reparation on the basis of additional written documents dealing with this subject alone. Judgment In its Judgment of 23 September2017, the Special Chamber decided as follows: THE SPECIAL CHAMBER (1) Unanimously, Finds that it has jurisdiction to delimit the maritime boundary between the Parties in the territorial sea, in the exclusive economic zone and on the continental shelf, both within and beyond 200 nm. (2) Unanimously, Finds that there is no tacit agreement between the Parties to delimit their territorial sea, exclusive economic zone and continental shelf both within and beyond 200 nm, and rejects Ghana s claim that Côte d Ivoire is estopped from objecting to the customary equidistance boundary. (3) Unanimously, Decides that the single maritime boundary for the territorial sea, the exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf within and beyond 200 nm starts at BP 55+ with the coordinates 05 05 23.2 N, 03 06 21.2 W in WGS 84 as a geodetic datum

4 and is defined by turning points A, B, C, D, E, F with the following coordinates and connected by geodetic lines: A: 05 01 03.7 N 03 07 18.3 W B: 04 57 58.9 N 03 08 01.4 W C: 04 26 41.6 N 03 14 56.9 W D: 03 12 13.4 N 03 29 54.3 W E: 02 59 04.8 N 03 32 40.2 W F: 02 40 36.4 N 03 36 36.4 W From turning point F, the single maritime boundary continues as a geodetic line starting at an azimuth of 191 38 06.7 until it reaches the outer limits of the continental shelf. (4) Unanimously, Finds that it has jurisdiction to decide on the claim of Côte d Ivoire against Ghana on the alleged international responsibility of Ghana. (5) Unanimously, Finds that Ghana did not violate the sovereign rights of Côte d Ivoire. (6) Unanimously, Finds that Ghana did not violate article 83, paragraphs 1 and 3, of the Convention. (7) Unanimously, Finds that Ghana did not violate the provisional measures prescribed by the Special Chamber in its Order of 25 April 2015. *** Judge Paik and Judge ad hoc Mensah appended separate opinions to the Judgment. *** The single maritime boundary is illustrated in the sketch map below, which is taken from the Judgment.

5 The text of the Judgment and opinions as well as a recorded webcast of the reading are available on the website of the Tribunal. Note: The press releases of the Tribunal do not constitute official documents and are issued for information purposes only. The press releases of the Tribunal, documents and other information are available on the Tribunal s websites (http://www.itlos.org and http://www.tidm.org) and from the Registry of the Tribunal. Please contact Ms Julia Ritter at: Am Internationalen Seegerichtshof 1, 22609 Hamburg, Germany, Tel.: +49 (40) 35607-227; Fax: +49 (40) 35607-245; E-mail: press@itlos.org