College of the Mainland Police Department Racial Profiling Policy

Similar documents
CORSICANA I.S.D. POLICE DEPARTMENT. Racial Profiling Policy

TARRANT COUNTY COLLEGE DISTRICT POLICE DEPARTMENT RACIAL PROFILING ANALYSIS

Double Oak Police Department. Racial Profiling

FARMERS BRANCH POLICE DEPARTMENT RACIAL PROFILING ANALYSIS

DENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT

DUNCANVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT RACIAL PROFILING ANALYSIS

ORLANDO POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY AND PROCEDURE , BIAS-FREE POLICING 1. PHILOSOPHY

DENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT

CEDAR HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT RACIAL PROFILING ANALYSIS

Corsicana Police Department Police Contact Data Annual Report January 1, December 31, 2014

Corsicana Police Department Police Contact Data Annual Report January 1, December 31, 2015

Racial Profiling and Complaint Procedures

SECTION: ADMINISTRATION ADM-133

Amarillo Police Department

BIASED BASED PROFILING

Racial Profiling Report Tier two

SEGUIN POLICE DEPARTMENT

UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT

THE END RACIAL PROFILING ACT OF 2004

Operational. DEPARTMENTAL POLICY General Orders O-26 Racial Profiling Prohibited

WTAMU POLICE DEPARTMENT

Dallas Police Department

Racial Profiling Report

Racial Profiling Report Full report

MONTPELIER POLICE DEPARTMENT

Executive Summary Plano Police Department Racial Profiling Report 1

Racial Profiling Report Full report

Racial Profiling Report Full report

GENERAL POLICE ORDER CLEVELAND DIVISION OF POLICE

Racial Profiling Report Full report

Sample Policies on Bias Based Policing

CHAPTER 121. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:

OAKLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT Office of Chief of Police

PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT DIRECTIVE 5.28

CHAPTER 6 FAIR CHANCES HIRING PROCESS ACT

An Overview of the. Field Information Report Review. and the Implementation of

POCOLA POLICE DEPARTMENT

REPORT TO THE STATE OF MARYLAND ON LAW ELIGIBLE TRAFFIC STOPS

State of Texas Community Safety Education Act Instructor s Guide

Community Views of Policing in Milwaukee

Subject FIELD INTERVIEWS, INVESTIGATIVE STOPS/DETENTIONS, WEAPONS PAT-DOWNS & SEARCHES. DRAFT 7 April By Order of the Police Commissioner

ANALYSIS OF THE DATA REVEALS THAT THE DEPARTMENT IS FULLY IN COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE TEXAS LAW ON THE COLLECTION OF RACIAL PROFILING DATA.

Chief of Police: Review Date: July 1

Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background Identifying a Baseline for Comparison... 13

Sample Policies on Bias Based Policing. Revised May 2017

The. Department of Police Services

CITY OF ONALASKA POLICE DEPARTMENT

Policy 5.11 ARREST PROCEDURES

Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs MODEL POLICY OFFICER-INVOLVED DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 ( HUMAN RIGHTS ) OF THE OAK PARK VILLAGE CODE BY ADDING A NEW ARTICLE 7 ( WELCOMING VILLAGE )

2. During the complaint intake process, no questions shall be asked of a complainant regarding their immigration status.

Report of the Community Safety Act Working Group May 25 th, 2017

FOR IMMIGRATION OFFICERS M-69

TEXARKANA, TEXAS POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDERS MANUAL. Amended Date November 1, 2015

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, MISSOURI 20th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MUNICIPAL DIVISION- THE CITY OF UNION

NEW SMYRNA BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT NEW SMYRNA BEACH, FLORIDA POLICY AND PROCEDURE DIRECTIVE

CITY OF LOS ANGELES CHIEF OF POLICE SURVEY 2018 SELECTION CRITERIA SURVEY RESULTS

Windsor Police Department General Order

10-Point Plan for the Chicago Community Consent Decree

The purpose of this policy to establish guidelines for release and dissemination of public information to news media.

No. 103,472 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, BILLY WHITE, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

a) The entry is limited in purpose and scope to discovery of a number as to which there is no reasonable expectation of privacy;

North Carolina Survey Results

What is the current relationship like between the Canby Police Department and the Latino community?

1 of 5 9/16/2014 2:02 PM

Yukon Corrections: Adult Custody Policy Manual. B 4.1 Inmate Disciplinary Process Approved by: Revised: February 9, 2018


MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE POLICY AND PROCEDURES

Fees & Fines. Ad Hoc Judicial Nominating Committee Oct. 18, 2016

(a) A person under 18 years of age may not operate a motor vehicle while using a wireless communication [communications] device, except in case of

Stop, Frisk and Related Issues. Capt. Adam R. Austino Vineland Police Department

SUBJECT: DUTY MANUAL ADDITION- DATE: August 25, 2013 L DOCUMENTING LIMITED DETENTIONS DURING SELF-INITIATED PEDESTRIAN AND/OR VEHICLE STOPS

VULCAN COUNTY County Bylaw Enforcement Officer Policy of Conduct

SENATE FILE NO. SF0132. Sponsored by: Senator(s) Scott and Representative(s) Stubson and Walters A BILL. for

TABLE OF CONTENTS. University of Toronto Mississauga Students Union Local 109 of the Canadian Federation of Students

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CRIME VICTIMS BILL OF RIGHTS REQUEST TO EXERCISE VICTIMS RIGHTS

INVESTIGATIVE ENCOUNTERS AT A GLANCE COMMAND LEVEL TRAINING CONFERENCE SEPTEMBER 2015 COURTESY PROFESSIONALISM RESPECT

Detentions And Photographing Detainees

CHAPTER 17 - ARREST POLICIES Alternatives to Arrest and Incarceration Criminal Process Immigration Violations

WARRENVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAINING SEMINAR

GENERAL COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION PROCEDURES

Marquette University Police Department

NONDISCRIMINATION AND EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

STAFF REPORT. MEETING DATE: March 3, 2015 AGENDA ITEM: 1WS. TITLE: Discuss Consent Agenda Items. STAFF REPRESENTATIVE: Kevin Hugman, City Manager

Arkansas Parole Board Manual SOS Rule Number 158 Stricken Language New Language 3 - RELEASE REVOCATION

City of New Britain POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY

TYPE OF ORDER NUMBER/SERIES ISSUE DATE EFFECTIVE DATE General Order /3/ /5/2014

The Complaint Process

MIDDLETOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES

Professional Standards and Internal Affairs Discipline Matrix

AZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Virginia Commonwealth University Police Department

As Introduced. 132nd General Assembly Regular Session S. B. No

SUPERIOR AND DISTRICT COURT DIVISIONS ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER

MBTA Transit Police CHAPTER 120. General Order No PAGE 1 OF 8

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COLONIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION AND THE DELAWARE STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT

Bowie State University Police Department General Order

UNITED KINGDOM ASSOCIATION OF FIRE INVESTIGATORS (UK-AFI) ETHICAL PRACTICE AND GRIEVANCE POLICY 2017

RENO POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDER

Protection of Whistleblowers from Retaliation and Procedures for Reviewing Retaliation Complaints (Whistleblower Protection Policy)

Transcription:

College of the Mainland Police Department Racial Profiling Policy I. PURPOSE The purpose of the policy is to reaffirm the College of the Mainland Police Department s commitment to unbiased policing in all its encounters between officer and any person; to reinforce procedures that serve to ensure public confidence and mutual trust through the provision of services in a fair and equitable fashion; and to protect our officers from unwarranted accusations of misconduct when they act within the dictates of departmental policy and the law. II. POLICY It is the policy of this department to police in a proactive manner and, to aggressively investigate suspected violations of law. Officers shall actively enforce state and federal laws in a responsible and professional manner, without regard to race, ethnicity or national origin. Officers are strictly prohibited from engaging in racial profiling as defined in this policy. This policy shall be applicable to all persons, whether drivers, passengers or pedestrians. Officers shall conduct themselves in a dignified and respectful manner at all times when dealing with the public. Two of the fundamental rights guaranteed by both the United States and Texas constitutions are equal protection under the law and freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures by government agents. The right of all persons to be treated equally and to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures must be respected. Racial profiling is an unacceptable patrol tactic and will not be condoned. This policy shall not preclude officers from offering assistance, such as upon observing a substance leaking from a vehicle, a flat tire, or someone who appears to be ill, lost or confused. Nor does this policy prohibit stopping someone suspected of a crime based upon observed actions and/or information received about the person. III. DEFINITIONS Racial Profiling A law enforcement-initiated action based on an individual s race, ethnicity, or national origin rather than on the individual s behavior or on information identifying the individual as having engaged in criminal activity. Racial profiling pertains to persons who are viewed as suspects or potential suspects of criminal behavior. The term is not relevant as it pertains to witnesses, complainants or other citizen contacts. The prohibition against racial profiling does not preclude the use of race, ethnicity or national origin as factors in a detention decision. Race, ethnicity or national origin may be legitimate factors in a detention decision when used as part of an actual description of a specific suspect for whom an officer is searching. Detaining an individual and conducting an inquiry into that person s activities simply because of that individual s race, ethnicity or national origin are racial profiling. Examples of racial profiling include but are not limited to the following:

a. Citing a driver who is speeding in a stream of traffic where most other drivers are speeding because of the cited driver s race, ethnicity or national origin. b. Detaining the driver of a vehicle based on the determination that a person of that race, ethnicity or national origin is unlikely to own or possess that specific make or model of vehicle. c. Detaining an individual based upon the determination that a person of that race, ethnicity or national origin does not belong in a specific part of town or a specific place. A law enforcement agency can derive at two principles from the adoption of this definition of racial profiling: 1. Police may not use racial or ethnic stereotypes as factors in selecting whom to stop and search, while police may use race in conjunction with other known factors of the suspect. 2. Law enforcement officers may not use racial or ethnic stereotypes as factors in selecting whom to stop and search. Racial profiling is not relevant as it pertains to witnesses, etc. Race or Ethnicity Of a particular decent, including Caucasian, African, Hispanic, Asian, or Native American. Pedestrian Stop An interaction between a peace officer and an individual who is being detained for the purpose of a criminal investigation in which the individual is not under arrest. Traffic Stop A peace officer who stops a motor vehicle for an alleged violation of a law or ordinance regulating traffic. IV. TRAINING Officers are responsible to adhere to all Texas Commission on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and Education (TCOLE) training and the Law Enforcement Management Institute of Texas (LEMIT) requirements as mandated by law. All officers shall complete a TCOLE training and education program on racial profiling not later than the second anniversary of the date the officer is licensed under Chapter 1701 of the Texas Occupations Code or the date the officer applies for an intermediate proficiency certificate, whichever date is earlier. A person who on September 1, 2001, held a TCOLE intermediate proficiency certificate, or who had held a peace officer license issued by TCOLE for at least two years, shall complete a TCOLE training and education program on racial profiling not later than September 1, 2003. The chief of police, as part of the initial training and continued education for such appointment, will be required to attend the LEMIT program on racial profiling. An individual appointed or elected as a police chief before the effective date of this Act shall complete the program on racial profiling established under Subsection (j), Section 96.641, Education Code, as added by this Act, not later than September 1, 2003.

V. COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION A. The department shall accept complaints from any person who believes he or she has been stopped or searched based on racial, ethnic or national origin profiling. No person shall be discouraged, intimidated or coerced from filing a complaint, nor discriminated against because he or she filed such a complaint. B. Any employee who receives an allegation of racial profiling, including the officer who initiated the stop, shall record the person s name, address and telephone number, and forward the complaint through the appropriate channel or direct the individual(s). Any employee contacted shall provide to that person a copy of a complaint form or the department process for filing a complaint. All employees will report any allegation of racial profiling to their superior before the end of their shift. C. Investigation of a complaint shall be conducted in a thorough and timely manner. All complaints will be acknowledged in writing to the initiator who will receive disposition regarding said complaint within a reasonable period of time. The investigation shall be reduced to writing and any reviewer s comments or conclusions shall be filed with the chief. When applicable, findings and/or suggestions for disciplinary action, retraining, or changes in policy shall be filed with the chief. D. If a racial profiling complaint is sustained against an officer, it will result in appropriate corrective and/or disciplinary action, up to and including termination. E. If there is a departmental video or audio recording of the events upon which a complaint of racial profiling is based, upon commencement of an investigation by this department into the complaint and written request of the officer made the subject of the complaint, this department shall promptly provide a copy of the recording to that officer. VI. PUBLIC EDUCATION This department will inform the public of its policy against racial profiling and the complaint process. Methods that may be utilized to inform the public are the news media, radio, service or civic presentations, the Internet, as well as governing board meetings. Additionally, information will be made available as appropriate in languages other than English. VII. CITATION DATA COLLECTION & REPORTING An officer is required to collect information relating to traffic stops in which a citation is issued. On the citation officers must include: 1. the violators race or ethnicity; 2. whether a search was conducted; 3. was the search consensual; and 4. arrest for this cited violation or any other violation.

By March of each year, the department shall submit a report to their governing board that includes the information gathered by the citations. The report will include: 1. a breakdown of citations by race or ethnicity; 2. number of citations that resulted in a search; 3. number of searches that were consensual; and 4. number of citations that resulted in custodial arrest for this cited violation or any other violation. Not later than March 1st of each year, this department shall submit a report to our governing body containing this information from the preceding calendar year. VII. COLLECTION AND REPORTING INFORMATION GATHERED FROM TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN STOPS An officer who stops a motor vehicle for an alleged violation of a law or ordinance regulating traffic, or who stops a pedestrian for any suspected offense, shall record and report the following information: 1. A physical description of each person detained as a result of the stop, including: a) The person s gender; b) The person s race or ethnicity, as stated by the person or as determined by the officer to the best of his/her ability. 2. The street address or approximate location of the stop. The suspected offense or the traffic law or ordinance alleged to have been violated. 3. Whether the officer conducted a search as a result of the stop and, if so, whether the person detained consented to the search. 4. Whether probable cause to search existed and, if so, the fact(s) supporting the existence of that probable cause. 5. Whether any contraband was discovered in the course of the search and, if so, the type of contraband discovered. 6. Whether the officer made an arrest as a result of the stop and/or search, and, if so, a statement of the offense charged. 7. Whether the officer issued a warning or a citation as a result of the stop and, if so, a statement of the offense charged.

This department shall compile and analyze the information contained in these individual reports. Not later than March 1st of each year, this department shall submit a report to our governing body containing the information compiled from the preceding calendar year in a manner they approve. This report will include: 1. A comparative analysis of the information contained in the individual reports in order to: a) Determine the prevalence of racial profiling by officers in this department; and b) Examine the disposition of traffic and pedestrian stops made by this department s officers, including searches resulting from stops. 2. Information relating to each complaint filed with this department alleging racial profiling. This report will not include identifying information about a peace officer who makes a stop or about an individual who is stopped or arrested by a peace officer. This model policy is intended as a guide. It should be reviewed by legal counsel prior to modification and implementation in any specific community.