UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Similar documents
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. District of Oregon. Plaintiff(s), vs. Case No: 6:07-CV-6149-HO. Defendant(s). Civil Case Assignment Order

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. District of Oregon. Plaintiff(s) vs. Case No: 3:09-CV-642-HU. Defendant(s). Civil Case Assignment Order

Case: 5:14-cv JRA Doc #: 29 Filed: 01/28/15 1 of 6. PageID #: 284 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. v. Funambol, Inc. Doc. 52

Case 1:08-cv EGS Document 19 Filed 12/12/08 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

LOCAL RULES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE CALENDARING OF CIVIL CASES DISTRICT COURT DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

Case 4:04-cv RAS Document 41 Filed 12/09/2004 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

INDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES JUDGE SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 5:16-cv CAR Document 19 Filed 05/25/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DISTRICT JUDGE EDWARD J. DAVILA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES

Case 1:99-cv PLF Document 6223 Filed 10/02/17 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

, Case Number: DR NOTICE OF INITIAL STATUS CONFERENCE IN OFFICE 5E

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER

U.S. District Court Northern District of Alabama (Southern) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:00-cv WMA

LOCAL COURT RULES JUDICIAL DISTRICT 17A - ROCKINGHAM COUNTY. General Court of Justice-Superior Court Division. State of North Carolina

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

JUSTICE JEFFREY K. OING PART 48 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES

DISTRICT COURT CONTINUANCE POLICY (Effective November 1, 1998)

ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE

SUGGESTED AMENDMENT SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (CR)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. v. Case No. 8:08-CV-1465-T-33TBM ORDER

ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON MARCH 31, Case No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

Case4:12-cv PJH Document82-1 Filed02/20/14 Page1 of 11

15B CIVIL RULES TABLE OF CONTENTS

MOTION OF BARCO, INC. FOR ALLOWANCE AND PAYMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE CLAIM PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. 503(b)(9)

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Nevada CASE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SHEET

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Case 1:11-cv MGC Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/17/2011 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Actions at Law / Civil Action / Pleadings

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:09-cv RB-RHS Document 139 Filed 11/01/13 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Purpose of Mandatory Fee Arbitration

LOCAL RULES OF PRACTICE FOR CIVIL SUPERIOR COURT CASES JUDICIAL DISTRICT 22A ALEXANDER AND IREDELL COUNTIES REVISED January 2015

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES OF JUDGE DEBORAH A. BATTS

Case5:12-cv HRL Document9 Filed08/09/12 Page1 of 5

Adopted November 10, 2000, by Chief District Court Judge John W. Smith. See Separate Section on Rules governing Criminal and Juvenile Courts Rule

Case 1:15-cv LTS Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 7

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 212 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. MC JFW(SKx)

Case 3:15-cv WHA Document 150 Filed 02/15/17 Page 1 of 7

U.S. District Court District of Columbia (Washington, DC) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:14 cv JDB

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Administrative Order Civ

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 3 CIVIL RULES

COMMERCIAL CALENDAR I (Effective January 30, 2012)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) UNIFORM SCHEDULING ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Case 3:09-cv WGY-JBT Document 1116 Filed 07/29/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID 41498

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Smith v. RJM Acquisitions Funding, LLC Doc. 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Case 2:12-md AB Document Filed 10/10/18 Page 1 of 18 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ORDER

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CIVIL CASES Nelson S. Román, United States District Judge. Courtroom Deputy Clerk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:16-cv JAK-AS Document 29 Filed 10/15/16 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:190

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Case3:12-cv VC Document28 Filed07/01/14 Page1 of 11

Case 6:14-cv PGB-KRS Document 229 Filed 12/10/15 Page 1 of 14 PageID 8774

Case 2:17-cv JLR Document 179 Filed 04/07/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Los Angeles Superior Court Limited Jurisdiction Department 77

NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT

Case 1:10-cv EGS Document 44 Filed 03/15/12 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

LEWIS A. KAPLAN United States District Judge United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. ORDER This matter came before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Modification of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. Plaintiff, v. Case No. 8:13-cv-704-T-33TBM ORDER

Case 2:11-cv JEM Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/18/2011 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY FAMILY DIVISION. Differentiated Case Management Plan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendant/s.

Case DHS Doc 120 Filed 07/07/14 Entered 07/07/14 15:50:18 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 9

Case 1:13-cv MSK-MJW Document 3 Filed 05/17/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Dodge County. 1) Rules of Decorum. (Sixth Judicial District)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. MDL No SCHEDULING ORDER NO. 2

Case4:12-cv JSW Document34 Filed09/19/14 Page1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

CIVIL DIVISION I PROCEDURES FOR THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : :

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF JACKSON BUSINESS COURT DIVISION. via telephone (check one) /

Wake County Family Court Rules Domestic

REPORT, RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER. This case was referred to the undersigned by the Hon. Richard J. Arcara,

Case 1:14-md DJC Document 1077 Filed 03/06/18 Page 1 of 7

COMPLEX CONSTRUCTION CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. It is, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, unless later modified by Order of this Court,

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/27/ :11 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/27/2018

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ORDER

LOCAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR THE SUPERIOR COURTS OF JUDICIAL DISTRICT 16B

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER #1

Case 1:16-cv ABJ Document 10 Filed 08/18/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:12-cv GZS Document 19 Filed 01/02/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 79 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Case 5:16-cv DDC-KGS Document 14 Filed 06/30/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 4:16-cv ALM Document 10 Filed 10/18/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 779

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

HONORABLE JACK R. ST. ARNOLD 315 COURT ST., ROOM 423 CLEARWATER, FL (727) Judicial Practice Preferences Circuit Civil / Foreclosures

Case 1:17-cv EGS Document 18 Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Transcription:

R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY et al v. UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION et al Doc. 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, 401 North Main Street Winston-Salem, NC 27101 Plaintiff, LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY, 714 Green Valley Road Greensboro, NC 27408 Plaintiff, COMMONWEALTH BRANDS, INC., 900 Church Street Bowling Green, KY 42101 Plaintiff, LIGGETT GROUP LLC, 100 Maple Lane Mebane, NC 27302, Plaintiff, SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC., 1 Plaza La Prensa Santa Fe, NM 87507 Plaintiff, v. Civil Case No. 11-1482 (RJL UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Silver Spring, MD 20993, Defendant. Dockets.Justia.com

MARGARET HAMBURG, Commissioner of the United States Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Silver Spring, MD 20993, Defendant. KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, 200 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20201, Defendant. CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER September 10, 2011 This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Richard Leon. The plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action. If this case came to the Court by a Petition for Removal, the removing defendant(s shall serve this order on all other parties. Upon the Court's motion, it is hereby ORDERED that within 30 days of all defendants answering the complaint or filing other motions under Rule 12(b of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or within 30 days of the issuance of this order if an answer or Rule 12(b motion has already been filed, the parties shall confer pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f and Local Civil Rule 16.3. 1 No later than fourteen days following that meeting, counsel shall submit: (1 1 The May 17, 2001 amendment to Local Civil Rule 16.3 sets forth additional categories of proceedings that are exempted from this Rule=s meet and confer requirements. If counsel's proceeding is exempt from the local rule's requirements, counsel for both parties shall jointly prepare and submit a statement to the Court

their Joint Meet and Confer Statement addressing all topics listed in Local Civil Rule 16.3(c; and (2 a proposed scheduling order(s in accordance with Rule 16.3(d. Counsel are also directed to include in their Joint Meet and Confer Statement a one-page statement of the facts of the case and the statutory basis for all causes of action and defenses. Once the Joint Meet and Confer Statement has been filed, the Court will schedule an initial status conference; and it is further ORDERED that all counsel must familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, particularly Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16 and 26, and the Local Rules of the District of Columbia, Ato secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of [this] action,@ Fed. R. Civ. P. 1; 2 and it is further ORDERED that parties comply with the following chambers practices and policies: 1. Courtroom Proceedings: All courtroom proceedings, unless otherwise indicated, will be conducted in Courtroom 18 on the sixth floor of the E. Barrett Prettyman United States Courthouse, 333 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20001. Non-courtroom conferences and meetings will be held in Judge Leon's chambers unless otherwise specified. 2. Communications with Chambers: Counsel shall not contact the Court or its chambers regarding non-emergency matters by telephone, facsimile, letter, or by any other means. Chambers may not provide legal advice or comment on the indicating whether they believe the matter will be resolved solely through the filing of dispositive motions and proposing a scheduling timeline for the filing of such motions to the Court. Counsel shall also indicate whether or not they believe an appearance before the Court will be necessary prior to resolution of the dispositive motions. 2 The Local Civil Rules are available at Ahttp:\\www.dcd.uscourts.gov@.

status of any pending motions. Counsel may contact the Courtroom Deputy Clerk regarding emergency scheduling matters. 3. Proposed Orders: All motions, whether filed through the Electronic Filing System (ECF or otherwise, must be accompanied by a proposed order setting forth the relief or action sought. Under no circumstances shall the signature line appear alone on a page of the proposed order. 4. Rescheduling Court Proceedings: Requests for continuances of court proceedings are strongly discouraged because of the inconvenience they cause to the Court. If counsel seeks to change a previously scheduled hearing date, counsel is directed to submit a written motion at least four days prior to the proceeding. In the event of an emergency, the four-day rule will be waived but counsel must still file a written motion in support of their request. The written motion must: a. demonstrate good cause for the continuance; b. state the opposing party=s position on the continuance; and c. propose at least three alternative dates and times that would be convenient for all parties in the case. If counsel=s suggested dates and times are not available on the Court=s calendar, an alternative of the Court=s choosing will be selected. 5. Court Appearances by Counsel: An attorney with authority to make scheduling decisions must appear on behalf of the parties at all court appearances. In addition, counsel must have their calendars and the calendars of any necessary co-counsel available with them for possible scheduling of future events related to the case. In the event that counsel is not a member of the Bar of this Court and is

located outside the District, local counsel 3 must be available to appear with the necessary authority to make scheduling decisions on behalf of all parties and counsel in the case. 6. Motions for Extensions of Time to File Pleadings: Motions for extension of time to file pleadings are strongly discouraged unless both parties consent. Counsel seeking an extension of time must file a written motion and a proposed order. Such a motion must include: a. the number of previous extensions requested and granted to each party; b. the specific ground(s for the motion; a statement of the effect that the Court=s granting of the motion will have on all other previously scheduled deadlines; 3 LCvR 83.2(c requires that an attorney who is not a member of the Bar of this Court must obtain local counsel that is a member in good standing of this Court. 5

c. in cases where the motion seeks to extend the deadline for a dispositive motion, a suggested timeline for the filing of the opposition 4 and reply; and d. pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7(m, the moving party shall include a statement of opposing counsel=s position on the motion. Failure to comply with the Local Civil Rules or this Order may result in rejection of the request. The Court grants such motions only upon a showing of good cause, focusing on the diligence of the party seeking the continuance and any prejudice that may result if the Court denies the continuance. 5 7. Pleadings: Every pleading signed by an attorney shall, in conformity with Local Civil Rule 5.1(e, contain the name, address, telephone number, fax number, and bar identification number of the attorney and, where applicable, local counsel. 8. Settlement and Alternative Dispute Resolution: In order to reduce litigation expenses and delay, to eliminate the anxiety of trial and the risk of an unsatisfactory outcome, it is desirable that settlement occur as early as possible in the litigation process. The Court is available to assist the parties in pursuing settlement early in the process. However, the Court will not delay trial so that the parties may participate in settlement discussions on the eve of trial. It shall be the norm for all cases to be referred for some form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR. Pursuant to Rule 16.3, the parties' Joint Meet and Confer 4 The deadline for the opposition should be suggested only after consulting with opposing counsel. 5 See Jackson v. Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, 101 F.3d 145 (D.C. Cir. 1996. 6

Statement should address the potential benefit of ADR to their case, what steps should be taken to facilitate ADR, and the point during litigation at which ADR would be most appropriate. In considering what form of alternative dispute resolution the parties think the case is most suited, counsel are reminded that their options include mediation (either with a private firm or a Magistrate Judge, arbitration, early neutral evaluation, summary jury trial, or any other form of alternative dispute resolution that can be tailored to the needs of their case. If the parties believe that the case is not a candidate for alternative dispute resolution, they should provide the Court with an explanation of their position. 9. Stipulations of Dismissal: Parties must submit a signed copy that includes a signature line for the Court. Under no circumstances shall the signature line appear alone on a page of the proposed order. SO ORDERED. //s// RICHARD J. LEON United States District Judge 7