:li([i~.j~}. ~.J Case No VCP

Similar documents
GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

Delaware Chancery Clarifies Duty Of Disclosure

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

Date Submitted: October 8, 2012 Date Decided: October 31, 2012

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 15, 2006 Session

Submitted: April 24, 2006 Decided: May 22, 2006

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CORPORATE LITIGATION: THE EFFECTIVENESS OF NON-RELIANCE PROVISIONS. Underlying Principles

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/16/ :46 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 53 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/16/2016 EXHIBIT 5

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR NASSAU COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION. vs. DIVISION: A

Department of Labor Division of Industrial Affairs Office of Anti-Discrimination Statutory Authority: 19 Delaware Code, Sections 712(a)(2) and 728

Posted by Jenness E. Parker and Kaitlin E. Maloney, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Sunday, May 21, 2017

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULING ORDER

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

Date Submitted: June 16, 2009 Date Decided: July 10, PharmAthene, Inc. v. SIGA Technologies, Inc., Civil Action No VCP

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT CHANCERY DIVISION CALENDAR 7 COURTROOM 2405 JUDGE DIANE J. LARSEN STANDING ORDER 2.

IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION., ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant.

Case 5:05-cv RMW Document 97 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:15-cv GMN-PAL Document 62 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California

Final Report: June 8, 2017 Date Submitted: May 31, 2017

EXHIBIT B IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE. In re Sanchez Energy Derivative Litigation C.A. No VCG SCHEDULING ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Submitted: April 12, 2005 Decided: May 2, 2005

Family Violence Protection Act, Sections to NMSA 1978.] v. No. TEMPORARY ORDER OF PROTECTION AND ORDER TO APPEAR

LEASE ADDENDUM FOR DRUG-FREE HOUSING. Property Address:

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

Case 5:14-cv JLV Document 138 Filed 10/06/15 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 1868

OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Date Submitted: August 11, 2009 Date Decided: August 13, 2009

Case 3:18-cv L Document 6-5 Filed 07/03/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID 97 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 1:04-cv DAB Document 569 Filed 12/02/10 Page 1 of 8 SOUTHERN DISTIUCT OF NEW YORK..

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROW ARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

You may owe fees for use of the App or the Services. Check with your Financial Institution for applicable rates.

PA Huntingdon Cty. Civ. LR 205 This document is current with amendments received through June 1, 2016

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR SUSSEX COUNTY

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 4:15-cv DLH-CSM Document 5 Filed 05/05/15 Page 1 of 11

AFFIDAVIT OF MEGAN D. McINTYRE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AND AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS

TRADEMARK LICENSE AGREEMENT

GRANTED WITH MODIFICATIONS

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION

FINAL JUDGMENT OF INJUNCTION FOR PROTECTION AGAINST STALKING (AFTER NOTICE)

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) SCHEDULING ORDER. Pharmaceuticals Stockholders Litigation, Consol. C.A. No.

Case 2:06-cv RSM Document 38 Filed 10/16/2007 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:18-cv M Document 62 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1084

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 11/10/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:314

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

PART 6: RESOLVING ISSUES AND PRESERVING RIGHTS

Voting Rights Act of 1965

Case 1:17-cv LJO-SAB Document 1 Filed 03/20/17 Page 1 of 9

H 7688 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Case 2:06-cv RSM Document 30 Filed 05/04/2006 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

NO. CAAP IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

Case 1:14-cv CRC Document 222 Filed 10/03/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE. April 15, 2004

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION

COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE. October 31, 2006

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

ONTARIO GASOLINE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Made on June 4, Between JAMES LORIMER. (the "Plaintiff. and

Case: 1:18-cv Document #: 24 Filed: 05/16/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:499

NO. 14 The Plaintiff, State of Washington, by and through its attorneys Robert W. Ferguson,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Re-StockX Sweepstakes Official Rules

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

TEMPORARY INJUNCTION FOR PROTECTION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE WITHOUT MINOR CHILD(REN)

TEMPORARY INJUNCTION FOR PROTECTION AGAINST STALKING

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/05/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

Case 1:16-cv VSB Document 2 Filed 07/26/16 Page 1 of 12

APPENDIX B SURETY BOND FORM CASH BOND FORM LETTER OF CREDIT CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT

Uniform management of institutional funds act, see chapter 517D. Uniform Probate Code, see chapter 560, Article VII.

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 03/25/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

SaaS Software Escrow Agreement [Agreement Number EL ]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 13, 2009 Session

GRANTED IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL AND ATTORNEYS FEES AND EXPENSES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RESIDENT JUDGE 500 N. KING STREET, SUITE WILMINGTON, DELAWARE (302)

COLUMBIA ASSOCIATION/VILLAGE COVENANT ENFORCEMENT PROCESS

scc Doc 15 Filed 06/19/18 Entered 06/19/18 12:49:01 Main Document Pg 1 of 10

H 5510 SUBSTITUTE B AS AMENDED ======== LC001499/SUB B ======== S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Case 2:08-cr DDP Document 37 Filed 10/19/2009 Page 1 of 5. United States District Court Central District of California

United States District Court Western District of Kentucky PADUCAH DIVISION

RULES CHESAPEAKE CIRCUIT COURT

~/

Case 8:07-cr AG Document 141 Filed 01/11/11 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:2159. United States District Court Central District of California

NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT

Transcription:

W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. v. Huey Shen Wu, et al., C.A. No. 7946-VCP, order (Del. Ch. Nov. 2, 2012 EFiled: Nov 02 2012 03:58P ~fa'f~~'\ Transaction 10 47528085 :li([i~.j~}. ~.J Case No. 7946-VCP ~~~t~~ IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ~:9" W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc., v. Plaintiff, Huey Shen Wu (a/k/a/ Samuel Wu, a/k/a Ben H. Wu, Ben Wu, and Perfect Defense Technology, Co., Defendants. C.A. No. 7946-VCP ORDER HOLDING DEFENDANTS IN CONTEMPT OF COURT AND PROVIDING FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS WHEREAS, Defendant Huey Shen Wu (a/k/a/ Samuel Wu, a/k/a Ben H. Wu, a/k/a Ben Wu ( hereinafter "Wu" appeared before this Court on multiple occasions in WL. Gore & Associates, Inc. v. Huey Shen Wu, et. al, C.A. No. 263-N ("Wu F'; WHEREAS, Wu is subject to the jurisdiction of this Court pursuant to Paragraph 5 of this Court's Final Order for Additional Injunctive Relief, dated September 19, 2006 ("Final Order", in Wu I; WHEREAS, Defendant Perfect Defense Technology, Co. ("Perfect Defense" is a Delaware corporation over which this Court has jurisdiction, and Wu is Perfect Defense's co-owner, president, and registered agent; WHEREAS, in the Final Order and Consent Judgment and Order, dated November 11, 2005 ("Consent Judgment", as entered in Wu I, this Court entered permanent injunctions prohibiting Wu from engaging in certain activities;

W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. v. Huey Shen Wu, et al., C.A. No. 7946-VCP, order (Del. Ch. Nov. 2, 2012 WHEREAS, pursuant to Paragraph 3.1 of the Final Order, Wu-either alone or in association with any other person or entity-is enjoined through March 1, 2016 from engaging or participating in any activity involving (a the research and/or development of, or the sale of research and/or development concerning polymers Wu worked on or with during his employment at Plaintiff W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. ("Gore" or products made from such polymers, including polytetraflouroethylene ("PTFE"; and (b the manufacture of polymers Wu worked on or with during his employment at Gore or products made from such polymers, including PTFE; WHEREAS, pursuant to Paragraph 3.2 of the Final Order, Wu-either alone or in association with any other person or entity-was enjoined through March 1, 2011 from engaging or participating in any activity involving (a the research and/or development of, or the sale of research and/or development concerning any TFE-containing polymers or products made from such polymers, including polytetraflouroethylene ("PTFE"; and (b the manufacture of any TFE-containing polymers or products made from such polymers, including PTFE; WHEREAS, pursuant to Paragraph 3.4 of the Final order, Wu was ordered to give notice to Gore of any employment he engaged in or accepted through March 2016, and describe the nature of the employment; WHEREAS, on October 12, 2012, Gore filed a Motion for Rule to Show Cause Why Defendant Huey Shen Wu Should Not Be Held in Contempt and papers in support thereof ("Show-Cause Motion"; 2

W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. v. Huey Shen Wu, et al., C.A. No. 7946-VCP, order (Del. Ch. Nov. 2, 2012 WHEREAS, Gore's counsel notified Wu and Perfect Defense (collectively "Defendants" of the Show-Cause Motion, including by leaving copies of the Show Cause Motion at Wu's Newark, Delaware home; sending a copy of the Show-Cause Motion to Wu via registered mail, certified mail, and Federal Express; and sending a courtesy copy of the Show-Cause Motion to Wu's private email account and a business email account at Perfect Defense; WHEREAS, by Order dated October 25, 2012 ("Show-Cause Order", the Court granted Gore's Show-Cause Motion and ordered that Defendants submit and file an answering brief responding to the allegations set forth in the Show-Cause Motion by noon on October 29, 2012; WHEREAS, Defendants did not submit and file an answering brief by noon on October 29, 2012; WHEREAS, by the Show-Cause Order, the Court scheduled a hearing on Gore's Show-Cause Motion for Wednesday, October 31, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. ("Show-Cause Hearing", and ordered Defendants to appear at the Show-Cause Hearing; WHEREAS, Gore's counsel notified Defendants of the Show-Cause Order by leaving copies of the Show-Cause Order at Wu's Newark, Delaware home; and sending a courtesy copy of the notice of the Show-Cause Hearing to Wu's private email account and a business email account at Perfect Defense; WHEREAS, Gore appeared through counsel at the Show-Cause Hearing on October 31, 2012, at 10:00 a.m.; 3

W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. v. Huey Shen Wu, et al., C.A. No. 7946-VCP, order (Del. Ch. Nov. 2, 2012 WHEREAS, Defendants did not appear at the Show-Cause Hearing and failed to offer any explanation for their conduct or the allegations in Gore's Show-Cause Motion at the Show-Cause Hearing; WHEREAS, based on the evidence presented to the Court, Wu, and Perfect Defense acting in concert with Wu, has violated the Final Order by engaging or participating in activity enjoined by sections 3.1 and 3.2 of the Final Order; and WHEREAS, Wu has further violated the Final Order by failing to give notice to Gore of any employment he engaged in or accepts through March 20 16, and describe the nature of the employment; WHEREAS, this Court finds that Defendants are in contempt of court for failure to comply with the Final Order. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Wu and Perfect Defense are held to be in contempt of court for failure to comply with the Final Order; 2. Defendants are to take immediate and sufficient steps to remedy their unlawful conduct and comply with the Consent Judgment and Final Order, including but not limited to refraining from further misconduct and further violation of this Court's Orders; 3. As used in the Final Order, it is clarified that "any activity" involving the research, development or manufacture of products made from polymers Wu worked on or with at Gore includes the sale, marketing, or promotional activity of such products; 4

W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. v. Huey Shen Wu, et al., C.A. No. 7946-VCP, order (Del. Ch. Nov. 2, 2012 4. This Order is binding upon Wu and Perfect Defense, their officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and upon those persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of the order by personal service or otherwise and no such person or entity may aid or abet Wu or Perfect Defense in further violation of the Final Order and Consent Judgment; 5. A daily fine of $5,000 per day is imposed on Defendants, jointly and severally, commencing on November 2, 2012, and accumulating until such time as the Court deems that Defendants have shown that they will abide by the Final Order and Consent Judgment; 6. Defendants are to pay Gore's reasonable attorneys' fees and costs related to these contempt proceedings, including but not limited to the fees and costs associated with preparing the Show-Cause Motion. Within 14 days of this Order, Gore shall submit an affidavit setting forth its fees and costs related to these contempt proceedings and Defendants will have 10 days after such submission to submit any response related to such affidavit. In the absence of such an objection within 10 days, Defendants' right to object to the reasonableness of Gore's fees and costs will be deemed waived; 7. The Court will not at this time appoint a receiver for Perfect Defense to the limited extent necessary to cure the contempt of the Court's Consent Judgment and Final Order; however this paragraph 7 is without prejudice to any future consideration of appointment of a receiver. 8. Gore is allowed to proceed with discovery and may be awarded other relief as this Court may deem appropriate, including but not limited to additional injunctive 5

W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. v. Huey Shen Wu, et al., C.A. No. 7946-VCP, order (Del. Ch. Nov. 2, 2012 relief (such as an extension of the temporal limits of the injunctions and damages at a figure to be determined later in the amount of Defendants' profits earned in violating the Consent Judgment and Final Order; and 9. The Court hereby orders Wu to self-surrender to this Court on November 27,2012, at 11:00 a.m., for incarceration (or be subject to arrest through a bench warrant if he fails to appear unless and until he has proven to the Court's satisfaction that he and Perfect Defense (a either have complied with the Consent Judgment and Final Order or have at least a colorable argument to that effect and (b will in the future comply with the Consent Judgment and Final Order; 10. The time period of the injunction ordered in paragraph 3.2 of the Final Order shall be extended from March 1, 2011 through the conclusion of this contempt proceeding, and subject to further order of this Court. For the sake of clarity, accordingly, Wu (either alone or in association with any other person or entity and Perfect Defense are hereby enjoined from engaging or participating in any activity involving (a the research and/or development of, or the sale of research and/or development concerning any TFE-containing polymers or products made from such polymers, including polytetraflouroethylene ("PTFE"; and (b the manufacture of any TFE-containing polymers or products made from such polymers, including PTFE. 6

W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. v. Huey Shen Wu, et al., C.A. No. 7946-VCP, order (Del. Ch. Nov. 2, 2012 11. The Court hereby orders Wu and Perfect Defense to preserve and not destroy all computers, devices, and documents (including all electronically-stored information that are relevant to this matter, including all documents related to Wu's professional activities since 2006. Dated: November 2, 2012 Is/ Donald F. Parsons, Jr. Vice Chancellor Donald F. Parsons, Jr. 7