POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE NATO PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY 2015

Similar documents
DECLARATION ON TRANSATLANTIC RELATIONS *

EMERGING SECURITY CHALLENGES IN NATO S SOUTH: HOW CAN THE ALLIANCE RESPOND?

WORKING DOCUMENT. EN United in diversity EN

UK DELEGATION PROPOSED AMENDMENTS IN RED (paragraphs 31, 32 and 42)

Mr Speaker, Mr Deputy Prime Minister, Madam Special Representative, dear Miroslav, Members of Parliament, General, Ladies and Gentlemen;

European Neighbourhood Policy

RESOLUTION ON PREVENTING AND COUNTERING TERRORISM AND VIOLENT EXTREMISM AND RADICALIZATION THAT LEAD TO TERRORISM 1

Statement by. President of the Republic of Latvia

The European Union Global Strategy: How Best to Adapt to New Challenges? By Helga Kalm with Anna Bulakh, Jüri Luik, Piret Pernik, Henrik Praks

12. NATO enlargement

Strategic priority areas in the Foreign Service

cyber warfare, climate change, resource conflicts and how to strengthen human security;

STATEMENT BY. H.E. Mr. LUBOMÍR ZAORÁLEK Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Czech Republic

France, Germany, Portugal, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and United States of America: draft resolution

epp european people s party

Draft Conclusions. Inter-Parliamentary Conference for the Common Foreign and Security Policy and the Common Security and Defence Policy

The Fourth Ministerial Meeting of The Group of Friends of the Syrian People Marrakech, 12 December 2012 Chairman s conclusions

POLITICAL EVOLUTION AT NATO LEVEL IN POST COLD WAR ERA

NATO after the Wales Summit: Back to collective defence

My other good colleague here tonight is Colonel Glen Dickenson who is the Garrison Commander of our installation here in Stuttgart.

Adopted by the Security Council at its 7598th meeting, on

U.S.- Gulf Cooperation Council Camp David Joint Statement

Prohlášení Statement Déclaration

INTERPARLIAMENTARY CONFERENCE FOR THE COMMON FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICY (CFSP) AND THE COMMON SECURITY AND DEFENCE POLICY (CSDP)

Council conclusions on Lybia, Syria, the EU-Russia relations and the situation in Venezuela

Council conclusions on counter-terrorism

8799/17 1 DPG LIMITE EN

Finland's response

Conference of Speakers of the European Union Parliaments

epp european people s party

JOINT STATEMENT PRIME MINISTERS COUNCIL OF THE BALTIC COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

Back to Basics? NATO s Summit in Warsaw. Report

Delegations will find attached the conclusions adopted by the European Council at the above meeting.

Resolution adopted by the Human Rights Council on 1 October 2015

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 17 December 2013 (OR. en) 17952/13 ELARG 176 COWEB 190

Draft U.N. Security Council Resolution September 26, The Security Council,

UN Security Council Resolution on Foreign Terrorist Fighters (FTFs)

A STRONGER GLOBAL ACTOR

Delegations will find in the Annex the Council Conclusions on Syria, adopted by the Council at its 3613rd meeting held on 16 April 2018.

TEXTS ADOPTED. Evaluation of activities of the European Endowment for Democracy (EED)

Preparatory Committee for the 2020 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) - EU Statement

AS DELIVERED. EU Statement by

Presidency Summary. Session I: Why Europe matters? Europe in the global context

Council conclusions on enlargment/stabilisation and association process. 3060th GENERAL AFFAIRS Council meeting Brussels, 14 December 2010

Resolution adopted by the Human Rights Council on 2 October /15. Human rights and preventing and countering violent extremism

- the resolution on the EU Global Strategy adopted by the UEF XXV European Congress on 12 June 2016 in Strasbourg;

Speech on the 41th Munich Conference on Security Policy 02/12/2005

Europe. Eastern Europe South-Eastern Europe Central Europe and the Baltic States Western Europe

Address by the President of the Republic of Estonia Toomas Hendrik Ilves at the General Debate of the 69th United Nations General Assembly

EPP Group Position Paper. on Migration. EPP Group. in the European Parliament

Timeline - response to migratory pressures

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 13 June [without reference to a Main Committee (A/68/L.50)]

European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2012 on the situation in Syria (2012/2543(RSP)) The European Parliament,

THE HOMELAND UNION-LITHUANIAN CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATS DECLARATION WE BELIEVE IN EUROPE. 12 May 2018 Vilnius

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 29 October /09 JAIEX 79 RELEX 981 ASIM 114 CATS 112 JUSTCIV 224 USA 93 NOTE

UN Peacekeeping Defence Ministerial: London Communiqué

Fifth Meeting. Tbilisi, September 2017 FINAL STATEMENT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Pursuant to Article 411(3) of the Association Agreement

Delegations will find attached the conclusions adopted by the European Council at the above meeting.

THE EU AND THE CRISIS IN SYRIA

Is This the Right Time for NATO to Resume Dialogue with Russia?

Debriefing on the Foreign Affairs Council (FAC) of 31 January 2013

EU-UKRAINE PARLIAMENTARY ASSOCIATION COMMITTEE Sixth Meeting

NATO-Georgia Substantial Package. The Parliament is actively involved in the ANP implementation, as well as in elaboration of priorities of ANP.

Delegations will find attached the conclusions adopted by the European Council at the above meeting.

Council conclusions on Enlargement and Stabilisation and Association Process. General Affairs Council meeting Brussels, 16 December 2014

Europe. Eastern Europe South-Eastern Europe Central Europe and the Baltic States Western Europe

SACT s lecture at. FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force. New York City, 16 Apr 2018,

DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2018/2158(INI) on the state of EU-Russia political relations (2018/2158(INI))

OSCE Permanent Council No Vienna, 30 August 2018

29. Strasbourg / Kehl Summit Declaration

United Nations Alliance of Civilizations Group of Friends Meeting. New York, 3 April Summary Report

Delegations will find in the Annex the Council conclusions on Iraq, adopted by the Council at its 3591st meeting held on 22 January 2018.

1 sur 5 05/07/ :26

NINTH MEETING OF THE EU-JORDAN ASSOCIATION COUNCIL (Brussels, 26 October 2010) Statement by the European Union P R E S S

81st INTER-PARLIAMENTARY MEETING TRANSATLANTIC LEGISLATORS DIALOGUE. Washington D.C., 5 December Joint Statement

Research Report. Leiden Model United Nations 2015 ~ fresh ideas, new solutions ~

European Council Conclusions on Migration, Digital Europe, Security and Defence (19 October 2017)

Mustafa, a refugee from Afghanistan, living in Hungary since 2009 has now been reunited with his family EUROPE

What is the OSCE? Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe

Joint Committee on Foreign Affairs and Trade, and Defence 13 December Developments at the Foreign Affairs Council

The Political Adaptation of the Alliance

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT TEXTS ADOPTED. European Parliament resolution of 15 January 2015 on the situation in Ukraine (2014/2965(RSP))

to the United Nations

ENGLISH only. Speech by. Mr Didier Burkhalter Chairperson-in-Office of the OSCE

European Defence Initiatives and technological development Claudio Catalano

JOINT DECLARATION. 1. With regard to the implementation of the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement, the CSP members:

Fifth Meeting of the Ministerial Council. Chairman's Summary

George W. Bush Republican National Convention 2000 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Party Platform: Foreign Policy - Europe

Policy Recommendations and Observations KONRAD-ADENAUER-STIFTUNG REGIONAL PROGRAM POLITICAL DIALOGUE SOUTH CAUCASUS

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL AND THE COUNCIL

DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2016/2310(INI)

NATO S ENLARGEMENT POLICY IN THE POST-COLD WAR ERA

NATIONAL SECURITY STRATEGY CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS

31/ Protecting human rights defenders, whether individuals, groups or organs of society, addressing economic, social and cultural rights

Delegations will find attached the conclusions adopted by the European Council at the above meeting.

External dimensions of EU migration law and policy

The Goals and Tactics of the Lesser Allies Introduction

CEI PD PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY. Skopje, 10 December 2015 FINAL DECLARATION

EPP Policy Paper 1 A Secure Europe

COREPER/Council No. prev. doc.: 5643/5/14 Revised EU Strategy for Combating Radicalisation and Recruitment to Terrorism

Transcription:

POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE NATO PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY 2015 NATO Parliamentary Assembly

The publication of this book has been funded by the Directorate for Security Policy (SIPOL) Swiss Federal Department of Defense, Civil Protection and Sports.

POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE NATO PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY 2015

POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE NATO PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY 2015 Brussels Geneva, 2016

Policy Recommendations of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly 2015 (Brussels / Geneva: NATO Parliamentary Assembly / Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces, 2016). NATO Parliamentary Assembly, 2016 Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces, 2016 Cover Design: OGS Press ISBN: 978-92-9222-424-0

FOREWORD Since its establishment in 2000, the Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) has enjoyed a lively and inspiring cooperation with the NATO Parliamentary Assembly across a wide range of subjects and outreach activities, not only in Rose Roth conferences conducted across Partnership for Peace nations, but in Annual Sessions, trainings for new parliamentarians, and the development of knowledge products and documentation on democratic governance and its associated best practices. Sixteen years on from the onset of cooperation, the need for capacity building in the realm of parliamentary oversight of the security sector remains as pertinent as ever. DCAF and the NATO PA, with the assistance of the Swiss Department of Defence, Civil Protection and Sports, are delighted to make this publication of 2015 NATO PA policy recommendations available to a larger public. Brussels and Geneva, September 2016 Dr. Philipp H. Fluri Deputy Director DCAF v

CONTENTS Introduction 2015 NATO s Adaptation to a Deteriorating Security Environment... 1 Policy Recommendations Adopted by the NATO Parliamentary Assembly in 2015... 5 Declaration 419 on NATO Enlargement... 5 Resolution 420 оn Addressing the Evolving Threat of Terrorism... 7 Resolution 421 on Countering Russia s Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns... 10 Resolution 422 on Solidarity with Ukraine... 12 Resolution 423 on Maintaining Support for the Wales Summit Initiatives... 14 Resolution 424 on Economic Sanctions against Russia... 18 Resolution 425 on an Urgent Comprehensive and Unified Response to Crises in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA)... 20 Resolution 426 on Strengthening Security and Stability Through NATO s Open Door and Partnership Policies... 23 Resolution 427 on Climate Change and International Security... 25 Annex 1: The NATO Parliamentary Assembly... 27 Annex 2: Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF)... 35 vii

Introduction 2015 NATO s Adaptation to a Deteriorating Security Environment David Hobbs, Ruxandra Popa and Andrius Avizius 1 The year 2015 saw a further aggravation of the security challenges which had made 2014 a turning point for Euro-Atlantic and global security. Russia s invasion and illegal annexation of Crimea in March 2014 the first attempt by a European state to change international borders by force since the end of the Second World War had opened a new chapter in international relations. Russia s military activism only intensified throughout 2015, from Ukraine to Syria. Meanwhile, the terrorist organisation calling itself the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, also referred to as Daesh, ISIS or ISIL 2 which had appeared on the world stage in 2014, continued to spread its hateful ideology and wreak instability in 2015, with repercussions far beyond the region, as evidenced by the tragic terrorist attacks in Paris in January and November, and a refugee crisis on an unprecedented scale. The beginning of the year was marked by the escalation of Russia s aggression in eastern Ukraine in support of so-called separatists. Despite a new agreement reached in Minsk on 12 February by the French, German, Ukrainian and Russian Heads of State and Government, the ceasefire remained elusive throughout 2015, and little progress was achieved in implementing the terms of the agreement. Russia also tightened its control over Crimea, while the human rights situation, and particularly the condition of the Crimean Tatar community, continued to deteriorate. The impact of the economic sanctions agreed by Western governments against Russia and its proxies in 2014 and renewed in mid-2015 was mixed: Russia s economy showed signs of weakness, but the regime appeared prepared to reallocate resources in order to continue to fund its military ambitions abroad. Indeed, 2015 saw an intensification of Moscow s military build-up throughout the entire theatre from the Baltic Sea to the Mediterranean. This was coupled with a sophisticated propaganda and disinformation campaign using a broad array of methods from direct fabrication of facts to setting up troll factories to create confusion and support 1 David Hobbs is the Secretary General, Ruxandra Popa the Deputy Secretary General, and Andrius Avizius the Director of the Committee on the Civil Dimension of Security, of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly. 2 Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. 1

2 Policy Recommendations of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly 2015 anti-establishment forces internationally, while promoting anti-western sentiments domestically. The ongoing conflicts in Syria and Iraq also remained a major source of instability in 2015. Iraqi authorities and their international allies retook control of several areas of Iraq previously held by Daesh. However, the group retained a strong foothold in both Iraq and Syria, and sought to expand to other unstable areas from Libya to Afghanistan. Meanwhile, Russia s air campaign in Syria launched in September 2015 in an effort to tilt the balance of forces back in favour of the Assad regime added yet another layer of complexity to the conflict. Russia s military involvement increased the risks of dangerous incidents, as evidenced by the downing in November 2015 of a Russian warplane which was believed to have violated Turkey s airspace. This serious incident led to a severe deterioration of Russia s relations with Turkey and other NATO Allies. The fluid situation on the ground prompted the international community to launch, in October 2015, a new peace initiative the International Syria Support Group involving key global and regional players. The turmoil in Syria and Iraq triggered the largest refugee and migrant crisis in Europe since the Second World War. More than a million people mostly Syrians, Afghans, Iraqis and Sub-Saharan Africans arrived in Europe in 2015, seeking refuge and better living conditions. Nearly 4,000 migrants died trying to cross the Mediterranean. Disagreements on how to address this immense challenge exacerbated divisions among and within European countries. The rise of Daesh and the spread of its radical ideology was also the catalyst for a new wave of gruesome terrorist attacks in Europe. France was hit particularly hard, with two major and well-prepared terrorist attacks in Paris in January and November 2015. These attacks propelled the threat of terrorism and radicalisation to the forefront of Europe s political agenda. They also highlighted the risks related to the so-called foreign fighters : tens of thousands of foreigners are believed to have joined the ranks of radical militant groups in Syria and Iraq since the fighting broke out in 2011. Several thousands of these came from Western democracies and could pose a security risk upon their return. In the face of these combined challenges, the North Atlantic Alliance focused on implementing the comprehensive agenda set by Allied Heads of State and Government at their Summit in Wales in September 2014. The cohesion and resolve demonstrated in Wales continued to guide NATO s actions in 2015. The Alliance took important measures to strengthen its deterrent capabilities by, inter alia: establishing new headquarters NATO Force Integration Units in six Central and Eastern European member states; augmenting considerably the NATO Response Force; creating the very highreadiness Spearhead Force ; and conducting around 300 exercises, including Trident Juncture, the largest NATO exercise in over a decade. To address challenges on the southern flank, the Alliance deployed its AWACS early warning aircraft in Turkey, and increased capacity-building assistance to partners in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. In 2015, Allies also took important steps to stop the trend of decreasing

2015 NATO s Adaptation to a Deteriorating Security Environment 3 defence budgets, and move towards the targets of 2 % of GDP dedicated to defence, including 20 % for investment and R&D. 2015 was an important turning point for NATO s engagement in Afghanistan. The Alliance terminated its 11-year combat operation in December 2014, but remained engaged with a new mission Resolute Support dedicated to training, assisting and advising Afghan security forces. NATO also continued to contribute to stability in the Western Balkans, militarily through KFOR in Kosovo, and politically through the process of integrating new members. The year 2015 ended with the invitation issued by Allied Foreign Ministers to Montenegro to join the Alliance. These complex developments all featured prominently on the NATO Parliamentary Assembly s (NATO PA) agenda in 2015. While formally independent from NATO, the Assembly, which celebrated its 60 th anniversary in 2015, brings together national parliamentarians from the 28 members of NATO as well as their counterparts from a range of NATO partners. The Assembly meets at regular intervals and in different formats some 40 times a year, and adopts reports and policy recommendations which represent the collective views of around 250 parliamentarians from across the Alliance on the key issues on NATO s agenda. The policy recommendations featured in this volume provide the thread of the Assembly s own response to the multifaceted challenges which characterized the past year. While the NATO PA normally adopts policy recommendations only once a year at its annual session, the Assembly exceptionally adopted, at its spring session in Budapest, Hungary, in May 2015, and at the initiative of the Hungarian delegation, a Declaration on NATO Enlargement (419). In this text, the Assembly which has traditionally been a staunch supporter of NATO s Open Door policy affirmed its support for Montenegro s membership, and recommitted itself to rendering aspirant countries all possible assistance to help them achieve their goal of NATO membership. The other policy recommendations featured in this booklet were adopted during the Assembly s annual session in Stavanger, Norway, in October 2015, and are based on the reports prepared by the Assembly s five Committees: the Committee on the Civil Dimension of Security; the Defence and Security Committee, the Economics and Security Committee, the Political Committee, and the Science and Technology Committee. These 8 policy recommendations address the following themes: Supporting a comprehensive and speedy implementation of the measures agreed by Allied Heads of State and Government in Wales in September 2014 (resolution 423); Calling for a unified response to security and humanitarian challenges in the MENA region (resolution 425); Reiterating support for the Open Door policy and calling on aspirant countries to step up reforms (resolution 426);

4 Policy Recommendations of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly 2015 Condemning Russia s aggression against Ukraine and its propaganda campaign as well as reaffirming the Alliance s support for, and solidarity with, Ukraine (resolutions 421, 422 and 424); Urging the adoption of more robust international measures to combat the threat of terrorism (resolution 420); Acknowledging that climate change-related risks are significant threat multipliers that will affect the global security environment (resolution 427). This latter resolution is an excellent example of the breadth of issues which Assembly members address. Their work focuses not only on immediate security threats, but also on the longer-term challenges to the security and well-being of their populations. In this regard, for over 25 years, the Science and Technology Committee has been instrumental in raising awareness of the challenge posed by climate change, and the linkages between climate change and security. Resolution 427 underlined the Assembly s support for the objectives of the historic UN Climate Change Conference held in Paris in December 2015 (COP 21). While these 8 policy recommendations constitute the formal expression of the Assembly s views, and, as such, are communicated to national parliaments, governments and NATO authorities, they are only one aspect of the Assembly s multifaceted response to international events. For instance, in February 2015, the Assembly s Bureau its President and Vice-Presidents issued a detailed statement on Demonstrating Alliance Cohesion And Resolve After Wales, reaffirming the Assembly s readiness to work closely with Allied governments and NATO authorities towards the timely implementation of the Wales Summit decisions. The NATO PA President issued regular statements expressing his and the Assembly s views on important international events, such as the signing of the Minsk II agreement or the formal invitation for Montenegro to join the Alliance. Assembly delegations conducted fact-finding visits to a number countries of special interest to NATO, including Armenia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Finland, Georgia, Israel, Japan, Kazakhstan, Qatar, the Republic of Moldova, Serbia, Sweden, Tajikistan, Tunisia, and Ukraine. A large seminar in Florence, Italy at the end of the year provided a timely forum to discuss dynamics in North Africa and the Middle East with parliamentarians from all over the region. The Assembly thus played its full part in making the parliamentary voice heard in the face of a deteriorating security environment in 2015. We hope that this collection of the Assembly s policy recommendations will help readers better understand the added value that parliamentary diplomacy can bring to decision-making in the areas of security and defence. The Assembly s members are the democratically elected representatives of the people in all member states of the Alliance. Their voice is therefore also that of the Alliance s citizens. This volume as well as the Assembly s website and social media sites is dedicated to them, and we would like to thank the Geneva Centre for Democratic Control of the Armed Forces for supporting its production.

POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS adopted by the NATO PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY in 2015 DECLARATION 419 on NATO ENLARGEMENT * The Assembly, 1. Recalling its Declaration 409 on NATO Enlargement adopted at the spring session in Vilnius in May 2014; 2. Reaffirming its full and continuous support for NATO enlargement and the membership aspirations of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Georgia, Montenegro and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia ** ; 3. Noting that in accordance with Article 10 of the Washington Treaty, NATO s door remains open for European countries ready and able to fulfil the requirements of NATO membership; 4. Acknowledging the renewal by Ukraine of its Euro-Atlantic aspirations; 5. Welcoming the Wales Summit decisions on the open door policy, including the renewed encouragement addressed to Bosnia and Herzegovina and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, ** the Substantial NATO-Georgia Package which helps Georgia to advance its membership of the Alliance, and the commitment to decide on Montenegro s invitation by the end of 2015; 6. Stressing that NATO aspirants must continue with necessary preparations to fulfil the requirements of NATO membership as set out in Article 10 of the Washington Treaty; * Presented by the Standing Committee and adopted by the Plenary Assembly on Monday 18 May 2015, Budapest, Hungary. ** Turkey recognises the Republic of Macedonia with its constitutional name. 5

6 Policy Recommendations of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly 2015 7. Recalling that NATO enlargement poses no threat to any nation but rather enhances the security and stability of the entire Euro-Atlantic region; 8. Stressing that the NATO enlargement process cannot be influenced by a third party, other than by Alliance and aspirant countries; 9. Highlighting the strong catalysing effect of the open door policy, and noting that this positive impact requires the open door policy to remain a realistic and credible prospect; 10. Convinced therefore that Allies must continue to affirm and demonstrate their commitment to the open door policy; 11. URGES the member governments and parliaments of the North Atlantic Alliance: a. to maintain the Wales Summit commitment to the open door policy; b. to deliver the support agreed at the Summit for aspirant countries, and to decide on Montenegro s invitation by the end of 2015; c. to continue supporting the implementation of a Substantial NATO-Georgia Package and, in accordance with the Bucharest 2008 Summit decision, to take the next step in Georgia s integration to NATO by granting it a Membership Action Plan; 12. URGES the governments and parliaments of the countries striving for NATO membership to redouble their efforts to address outstanding issues on their path towards membership; 13. RECOGNISES the difficult environment, in which Ukraine appears against a backdrop of the unprecedented aggression by the Russian Federation, and ENCOURA- GES the Ukrainian Government and Parliament to put every effort into reforming the country according to democratic Euro-Atlantic standards. 14. PLEDGES, as it has done in the past, to render aspirant countries all possible assistance to help them achieve their goal of NATO membership.

RESOLUTION 420 оn ADDRESSING THE EVOLVING THREAT OF TERRORISM * The Assembly, 1. Condemning in the strongest terms the 10 October 2015 terrorist attack in Ankara and expressing its solidarity with the people of Turkey in the face of this tragedy; 2. Deeply concerned that the threat of terrorism in all its forms, including home-grown terrorism, has increased in recent years in the Euro-Atlantic area, as witnessed by terrorist attacks in Brussels, Ottawa, Paris, Copenhagen and Saint-Quentin-Fallavier, inter alia; 3. Alarmed by the proliferation of violent extremist groups across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region and beyond, and the extreme brutality and extensive, systematic abuse of human rights by these groups, in particular by Daesh and groups inspired by it; 4. Noting that these groups continue to threaten the security of neighbouring states, including members of the Euro-Atlantic community, primarily due to the so-called foreign fighters phenomenon and the use of the online communication platforms to promote violence and extremist ideas; 5. Concerned about the rise of xenophobia, islamophobia and other religious prejudices; 6. Commending the efforts of the international community to address the evolving terrorist threat, including the adoption of the UN Security Council Resolution 2178 to stem the flow of foreign terrorist fighters, the renewed initiatives to establish European Union-wide mechanisms to prevent terrorism, NATO s efforts to improve threat awareness and preparedness of the Allies, as well as a number of significant measures adopted on the national level in the Euro-Atlantic area to enhance national counter-terrorism capabilities, improve information sharing with relevant partners and assist countries in the MENA region with training, technical support and, when necessary, targeted military action against violent extremist groups; 7. Stressing that law enforcement measures alone are insufficient and need to be complemented by programmes focusing on the prevention of radicalisation and deradicalisation; * Presented by the Committee on the Civil Dimension of Security and adopted by the Plenary Assembly on Monday 12 October 2015, Stavanger, Norway. 7

8 Policy Recommendations of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly 2015 8. Emphasising the need to ensure that additional security measures do not undercut the values of freedom, democracy and human rights that underpin the North Atlantic Alliance; 9. Considering that a positive role is played by international support for development in those countries where social and economic problems, as well as inadequacy of local governments, corruption, lack of respect for human rights and the rule of law, create favourable conditions for terrorism expansion, particularly in Northern Africa and the Sub-Sahara region; 10. URGES the member governments and parliaments of the North Atlantic Alliance: a. to continue strengthening NATO s contribution to countering terrorism by expanding its role as a platform for exchanging relevant information and best practices among the Allies and partners, as well as for jointly developing technological counter-terrorism solutions; b. to support the EU s role in counter-terrorism, particularly by championing initiatives such as the creation of the European passenger name record; the introduction of an EU black list of terrorist suspects; the establishment of an EU terrorist finance tracking system; the strengthening of Frontex and Europol; the adoption of the Smart Borders package; the development of a European platform to improve the monitoring of extremist activity on the Internet; and the formation of a European tribunal specialising in terrorism offenses; c. to improve, in co-operation with the international community, and in particular the EU and NATO countries, their efforts in supporting international development and capacity-building programmes, giving priority to those countries where terrorism takes advantage from social, economic and governance difficulties to expand its influence; d. to implement vigorously UN Security Council Resolution 2178 on foreign terrorist fighters and to support broader global counter-terrorism initiatives such as the 2006 UN Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy and the 2011 Global Counterterrorism Forum; e. to improve and broaden intelligence information-sharing mechanisms among the Allies and to encourage horizontal co-operation of sub-national law enforcement agencies; f. to invest adequately into the research and analysis of the phenomenon of homegrown terrorism; g. to ensure the implementation of the 40 Recommendations by the G7 Financial Action Task Force, the purpose of which is to establish standards to combat money laundering and terrorism financing, and to assist countries that are not yet meeting these standards;

Policy Recommendations 9 h. to ensure that law enforcement agencies have the adequate funding and manpower and to invest in technological counter-terrorism solutions including those that improve railway transport security; i. to consider augmenting national and sub-national counter-radicalisation programmes and to share best practices in this area; j. to mitigate the influence of extremist ideology and to facilitate counter-extremist narratives by curtailing the activities of hate preachers, supporting peaceful and moderate religious figures and encouraging the involvement of influential people such as musicians, sportsmen or bloggers who can appeal to the younger generation; k. to reinforce legal, parliamentary and civil oversight mechanisms regarding the use of surveillance and law enforcement agencies, and to exchange best practices and lessons learned in this area; l. to increase assistance to smaller European Allies as well as to partners in Europe, Asia and Africa, especially those with a large number of fighters returning from conflict zones, in addressing terrorist threats by augmenting the existing national intelligence, law enforcement and military capabilities of these countries.

RESOLUTION 421 on COUNTERING RUSSIA S PROPAGANDA AND DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGNS * The Assembly, 1. Alarmed by the intensity of Russia s propaganda and disinformation policies towards its own population, its neighbourhood and beyond, using various local media outlets to spread anti-western sentiment, hate speech, homophobia and xenophobia, which aim to weaken Euro-Atlantic solidarity, to justify aggression against neighbours and to obstruct their Euro-Atlantic integration as well as to boost the popularity of Putin s regime; 2. Denouncing Russia s misuse of the open and pluralistic nature of the free world s media scene, while its own media space remains under the tight control of the government; 3. Aware that Russia s policy arsenal to influence and manipulate opinion abroad includes, among other techniques, creating confusion in the information space by spreading unverified information and conspiracy theories; disseminating completely fabricated reports; employing so-called Internet trolls; infiltrating the expert and NGO scenes as well as compatriot communities; promoting a distorted version of history; and increasing Russia s footprint in foreign media space; 4. Convinced that Russia s propaganda campaigns pose both an immediate and a long-term challenge that requires an active response by Allies, including the promotion of strong counter-narratives; 5. Stressing that this response should not include counter-propaganda, and must remain faithful to the values of democracy, human rights and freedom of the media; 6. Commending the efforts of NATO and the EU to address this challenge, in particular the work of NATO s Public Diplomacy Division, including its increased assistance to Ukraine; the inauguration of the NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence in Riga; the preparation of the EU Action Plan on Strategic Communication; as well as the national efforts of NATO and EU member states and Eastern European partners; * Presented by the Committee on the Civil Dimension of Security and adopted by the Plenary Assembly on Monday 12 October 2015, Stavanger, Norway. 10

Policy Recommendations 11 7. URGES the member governments and parliaments of the North Atlantic Alliance: a. to further reinforce relevant bodies within NATO and the EU in order to enhance their ability to respond swiftly to the most blatant cases of disinformation, including the revision of policies regarding classified intelligence information such as satellite imagery to allow public diplomacy officers to use less sensitive information; b. to facilitate the development of a coherent set of arguments refuting myths cultivated by Moscow; c. to establish platforms for the exchange of best national practices among the Euro-Atlantic community and for flagging potential information security threats; d. to revisit legislation that strengthens legal counter-measures such as imposing fines for the use of hate speech and clear disinformation; e. to encourage the world s leading media outlets to develop a set of high journalistic standards and encourage independent global watchdogs to monitor how these standards are being followed; f. to support international and national media initiatives in the Russian language, including launching a commonly-funded engaging and dynamic Russian-language TV channel; g. to revisit legislation in order to increase transparency of the funding of the media, NGOs and think tanks; h. to continue applying individual travel sanctions against the most active propagandists; i. to promote innovative and inexpensive measures such as the greater use of humour; j. to invest in research and education on how to recognise, report and react to orchestrated trolling attacks; k. to increase capacity building assistance to partner countries including Georgia, the Republic of Moldova and Ukraine in the field of strategic communications; l. to support the work of professional historians who can provide credible responses to pseudo-scientific theories propagated by Moscow; m. to encourage grass-roots civic initiatives that expose disinformation.

RESOLUTION 422 on SOLIDARITY WITH UKRAINE * The Assembly, 1. Reiterating its firm support for the government and the people of Ukraine in their struggle for independence and territorial integrity and their pursuit of European and Euro-Atlantic integration; 2. Condemning in the strongest terms the illegal annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation and Russia s continuing military aggression in eastern Ukraine as well as the detention of Nadiya Savchenko, Oleh Sentsov and other Ukrainians since the beginning of the conflict, in blatant violation of Russia s international obligations and commitments under the Minsk agreements; 3. Deeply disturbed by Russia s disregard for human rights in the illegally occupied Ukrainian territories, including severe repression of the Tatar community and Ukrainian minority in Crimea; 4. Applauding the constitutional amendments in Ukraine designed to devolve more powers to local governments as a manifestation of Ukraine s commitment to building an inclusive society; 5. Deeply regretting that Russian-backed separatist forces in eastern Ukraine are preventing Ukrainian local elections from taking place in areas under their control in contravention of the Minsk agreements; and calling on Russia to be co-operative in the development of an understanding on the modalities and timeframe of local elections in certain areas of the Luhansk and Donetsk regions; 6. Deploring Russia s decision to veto the plans for an international tribunal to investigate the downing of the Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17; 7. Emphasising the need for diplomatic efforts to resolve the conflict with Russia and welcoming the recent ceasefire as an important step, while recognising that these efforts should not compromise Ukrainian territorial integrity nor Ukraine s inalienable right to determine its own place in the European and Euro-Atlantic order; 8. URGES member governments and parliaments of the North Atlantic Alliance: a. to redouble efforts to help Ukraine at this critical juncture by increasing diplomatic, political, financial, economic, material and expert assistance both bilater- * Presented by the Committee on the Civil Dimension of Security and adopted by the Plenary Assembly on Monday 12 October 2015, Stavanger, Norway. 12

Policy Recommendations 13 ally and through bodies such as NATO, the EU and the NATO Parliamentary Assembly; b. to maintain political, diplomatic and economic pressure on Russia until Moscow fully implements its commitments under the Minsk agreements, convincingly demonstrates that it is willing to abide by international law, and ends the occupation of Ukrainian territories, including Crimea; c. to press Russia and separatist forces to lift all restrictions on the ability of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission in Ukraine to access to all areas of eastern Ukraine, including areas along the border with Russia, and report fully all relevant observations; d. to encourage and support direct talks between Russian and Ukrainian representatives with the participation of international mediators in order to find a peaceful solution to the conflict; 9. CALLS on democratically elected Ukrainian politicians to continue to demonstrate the moderation and determination necessary to build an inclusive and tolerant society, and to establish the highest standards possible in matters of political, economic and judicial governance, and, in particular, to tackle resolutely the problem of corruption.

RESOLUTION 423 on MAINTAINING SUPPORT FOR THE WALES SUMMIT INITIATIVES * The Assembly, 1. Recognising the changed security environment on NATO s eastern and southern flanks, requiring determined, comprehensive whole-of-alliance responses; 2. Appalled by Russia s annexation of Crimea and continued military interference in Ukraine as well as by the occupation of the territories of Abkhazia and the Tskhinvali region (South Ossetia) of Georgia, and troubled by the difficulties encountered so far to implement the provisions of the Minsk II agreement and the EU-brokered Russian-Georgian ceasefire agreement of 12 August 2008; 3. Supporting accordingly the advances made at the Normandy Format Summit in Paris on 2 October 2015 with a view to consolidating the ceasefire and implementing the political part of the Minsk agreements in accordance with a suitable timetable; 4. Remaining unified and vigilant vis-à-vis Russia s ongoing attempts to use hybrid tactics to destabilize the eastern regions of the Alliance; 5. Alarmed by the increasing instability and rise of powerful, disruptive non-state armed groups throughout the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) which have caused unprecedented levels of conflict, state failure and displaced populations; 6. Concerned by the increasing refugee flows from the MENA region toward Europe, posing some of the greatest challenges to all member and partner states in decades; 7. Recognising that, in the face of the new international security environment, solidarity among the members of the Euro-Atlantic community is as important today as it has ever been; 8. Acknowledging the Readiness Action Plan (RAP) and the Defence Spending Pledge, announced at the September 2014 Wales Summit, as key initiatives necessary for the Alliance to rise to these current and future security challenges; 9. Commending all 28 Allies for contributing to reassurance measures in Eastern Europe, including continuous air, land and maritime presence and other meaningful military activity, but calling for greater efforts to address the challenges emanating from the increasing instability along the Alliance s southern flank; * Presented by the Defence and Security Committee and adopted by the Plenary Assembly on Monday 12 October 2015, Stavanger, Norway. 14

Policy Recommendations 15 10. Encouraged by the progress of the RAP via the enhancement of the NATO Response Force (NRF) and the rapid establishment, training and exercising of the Very High Readiness Joint Task Force (VJTF), as a means of increasing Alliance readiness; 11. Noting that effective implementation of the RAP requires a robust, flexible and responsive NATO command structure with increased regional focus and enhanced situational awareness; 12. Welcoming the establishment of new multinational command and control structures, the NATO Force Integration Units, to support collective defence planning and assist with the multinational training and exercising of NATO forces in Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Romania; 13. Approving of the enhanced exercise programme with an increased focus on collective defence and incorporating hybrid threats and complex civil-military scenarios, but also recalling the need to maintain peak crisis response capabilities in parallel; 14. Applauding the organisation and launch of Trident Juncture Exercise 2015, qualifying elements of the NRF for rotational duties and proving the capabilities of the VJTF; 15. Expressing its appreciation to Germany, the Netherlands and Norway for leading the training and exercising of the interim VJTF, as well as its appreciation to Spain, the United Kingdom, Italy, Poland, Turkey and France for agreeing to be VJTF framework nations in the coming years; 16. Welcoming efforts by the United States to support the RAP through the European Reassurance Initiative and other high-end military asset transfers; 17. Aware that NATO s ability to reinforce host nation defences quickly along the eastern flank depends inter alia upon the preparation of infrastructure, preposition of equipment and supplies, and designation of specific bases for use, and urges that this work should be accelerated; 18. Stressing the importance for NATO of strengthening co-operation with the EU, based on the complementarity of their respective capabilities; 19. Emphasising also the importance of NATO enhancing co-ordination with other regional institutions; 20. Confident that the implementation of the RAP will be a success, emblematic of the Alliance s posture after the Wales Summit; 21. Noting the hybrid and distributed nature of current security threats on both the eastern and southern flanks of the Alliance require Allies to invest in their national capabilities and shore up NATO s situational awareness, mobility, and response time; 22. Cognizant that the NRF is only a small subset of the total national forces that may be called upon by NATO in an emergency and that the Allies need to maintain ade-

16 Policy Recommendations of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly 2015 quate readiness of their forces in order to conduct NATO s full range of missions; 23. Highlighting and reminding NATO member states of the importance of the Wales Summit Defence Spending Pledge, and cognizant of the high cost of reassurance and deterrence measures necessary today and into the future; 24. Commending efforts of European Allies to contribute to defence capabilities through the NATO Framework Nations Concept and the launch of three multinational European projects at the Wales Summit; 25. Underscoring that a strong European defence industry is critical not only to the development and maintenance of Alliance-wide capabilities, but also to address the growing problem of transatlantic and inter-european burden sharing; 26. Recognising the importance of the Alliance s open door policy for the Alliance itself and for partner and aspirant countries to join the Alliance based on their will and readiness; 27. URGES member governments and parliaments of the North Atlantic Alliance: a. to work to reverse the trend of declining defence budgets and to encourage Allies to move toward the NATO guidelines that recommend spending 2 % GDP on national defence; and to dedicate at least 20 % of their spending on new equipment; b. to demonstrate the political will and foresight to invest in their present and future defence forces, thereby strengthening their contributions to Alliance capability and readiness; c. to seek the basis for agreement on the framework for the utilisation of elements of the Readiness Action Plan in sub-article 5 situations, particularly regarding the authority to alert and stage NATO forces; d. to work together to facilitate the rapid movement of equipment across European member states territories during contingency operations; e. to plan for and understand the processes necessary for force deployment by individual member states; f. to renew discussions about intelligence sharing with NATO civil and military leaders as a means of enhancing situational awareness across the Alliance; g. to increase public outreach and education efforts to expand and build awareness and resilience among domestic populations as a means of resisting subversive tactics of hybrid warfare; h. to reaffirm commitments to share the burdens of the Alliance s costs and responsibilities, thereby strengthening fundamental and essential transatlantic and inter-european bonds of trust; i. to continue to support and further contribute to the implementation of the Substantial NATO-Georgia Package which helps Georgia advance in its prepa-

Policy Recommendations 17 rations towards membership in the Alliance, while welcoming the progress made on the Package, particularly the holding of the first NATO-Georgia exercise and the inauguration of the Joint Training and Evaluation Centre in Georgia (JTEC); j. to provide support to partner states receiving refugees from the MENA region; k. to develop national cyber defence capabilities, and to continue to devise and enhance strategies of cyber defence co-operation among Allies and with relevant partner nations and organisations.

RESOLUTION 424 on ECONOMIC SANCTIONS AGAINST RUSSIA * The Assembly, 1. Acknowledging that Russia s illegal annexation of Crimea, ongoing military aggression in Eastern Ukraine as well as other efforts to destabilise Ukraine are consistent with its aggressive posture toward its neighbours, including the occupation of the Georgian territories of Abkhazia and the Tskhinvali region (South Ossetia), threaten European security, and constitute a serious violation of international law, including the UN Charter and Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances; 2. Noting Russia s illegal aggression and support for armed groups in certain areas of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine; 3. Expressing solidarity with Ukraine and determination to assist it in this difficult moment; 4. Noting that Western sanctions on Russia represent a measured response to its transgressions of international law and send an important signal that business as usual is impossible as long as Russia persists in this policy line; 5. Affirming that these sanctions aim to express opposition to Russian actions, to signal that there is a price to pay for its Ukraine policy, with the objective of fully implementing the Minsk agreements, and to pressure Russia to come to the negotiating table to settle current disputes related to Ukraine and to stop violating fundamental international norms and principles; 6. Applauding the European Council s decision to extend sanctions against Russia as well as measures targeting dealings with Crimea and Sevastopol which Russia illegally occupies; 7. Recognising that Russia currently confronts an array of domestic economic difficulties linked to the falling price of energy, overreliance on energy exports, self-imposed restrictions on trade with Western countries, the flight of capital due to worsening governance and corruption problems; 8. Acknowledging that the United States, Canada and the EU stand ready to take further measures if required; * Presented by the Economics and Security Committee and adopted by the Plenary Assembly on Monday 12 October 2015, Stavanger, Norway. 18

Policy Recommendations 19 9. URGES member governments and parliaments of the North Atlantic Alliance: a. to maintain the current sanctions regime on Russia concerning the situation in Eastern Ukraine as long as the Minsk agreements are not fully implemented, and to maintain the sanctions concerning Crimea/Sevastopol as long as the annexation is not ended; b. to be prepared to toughen these sanctions if Russia fails to meet its obligations under the Minsk agreements; c. to provide comprehensive support to the democratically elected government of Ukraine which is under enormous pressure from Russia; d. to demonstrate political and economic solidarity with those countries suffering from Russia s counter-sanctions and those non-nato countries the economic and political freedom of which Russia now threatens; e. to counter Russia s highly misleading narrative about the nature of this conflict; f. to deny Russia the political leverage it seeks to exercise over the continent by diversifying Europe s energy supply base and enhancing energy interconnections, thus reducing its reliance on Russian oil and gas; g. to maintain channels of communication with the Kremlin and to work to find diplomatic ways to resolve these serious tensions.

RESOLUTION 425 on AN URGENT COMPREHENSIVE AND UNIFIED RESPONSE TO CRISES IN THE MIDDLE EAST AND NORTH AFRICA (MENA) * The Assembly, 1. Deeply concerned about the continuing conflicts in Syria and Iraq which have triggered a devastating humanitarian crisis with severe repercussions for regional and global security; 2. Appalled by the brutal and indiscriminate use of force as well as by the gross, systematic and widespread human rights violations by the regime of Bashar al-assad, as well as by Daesh and other parties to the conflicts in Syria and in Iraq; 3. Condemning Daesh s destruction of cultural sites considered as historical and architectural treasures; 4. Commending Turkey, Jordan, Lebanon and the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) for hosting the overwhelming majority of refugees and internally displaced persons; 5. Recognising that many European countries are also confronted with an increasing inflow of refugees from the MENA region; 6. Noting that the number of returning foreign fighters is a key security concern for the countries in the MENA region, but also for other countries worldwide; 7. Alarmed that the rise of Daesh in Syria and Iraq is impacting the stability of the MENA region, particularly Libya which risks sliding into further anarchy and chaos, unless the Government of National Accord is formed without further delay, and deeply concerned about the security situation in Yemen which has become a veritable safe haven for terrorist organisations following many years of dysfunctional governance and internal conflicts; 8. Convinced that any long-term settlement of these crises requires inclusive political solutions supported by all relevant international stakeholders, but that keeping up military pressure against Daesh and other extremist groups is essential in the meantime; 9. Concerned that, in the absence of such a long-term settlement, the humanitarian * Presented by the Political Committee and adopted by the Plenary Assembly on Monday 12 October 2015, Stavanger, Norway. 20

Policy Recommendations 21 crises in the MENA region will only worsen, thereby fuelling a further deterioration of security and an increase in the number of refugees; 10. Affirming that dealing with the conditions that enable and support Daesh s rise is a strategic priority that requires countries in the MENA region to pursue inclusive policies and work together to stem the spread of extremist ideologies; 11. Concerned that Russia s military intervention and support for the Assad regime escalates the war and complicates finding a solution in Syria, and alarmed about Russia s violation of Turkish airspace and failure to co-ordinate its efforts with the international coalition against Daesh; 12. Welcoming the successful conclusion of the negotiations on Iran s nuclear programme; 13. URGES the member governments and parliaments of the North Atlantic Alliance, the EU, the international community and the governments of the countries in the MENA region: a. to continue to support the international coalition s efforts to neutralise the extremist groups operating in Syria and Iraq; b. to step up efforts to reach a comprehensive ceasefire and peaceful settlement of the conflict in Syria through a Syrian-led and inclusive political process, and to support the ongoing diplomatic efforts in this regard, including those by the United Nations Special Envoy; c. to examine the possibility of the establishment of a no-fly zone and safe zones in Syria for the sheltering and protection of local communities and internally displaced persons; d. to increase humanitarian aid significantly and facilitate the granting of asylum for refugees and internally displaced persons fleeing the wars in Syria and Iraq; e. to provide support to partner states granting asylum to refugees fleeing the wars in Syria and Iraq; f. to consider further measures, bilaterally and through NATO, to support Iraq in its fight against Daesh and other extremist groups; g. to continue to press the government of Iraq to pursue an active policy of inclusion and reconciliation involving all religious and ethnic minorities of the country, and to monitor the implementation of that policy; h. to work towards an agreement of all parties to the Libyan dialogue on the final text presented by UN Special Representative and Head of the UN Support Mission in Libya (UN SRSG), Bernardino León, and to follow up by assisting Libya in the process of reconciliation, rehabilitation and stabilisation; i. to improve the support to international development and capacity-building programmes in the MENA region;

22 Policy Recommendations of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly 2015 j. to develop a comprehensive policy approach to forces fighting Daesh, including the Kurdish Peshmerga (Iraq), which focuses on providing advice, training and assistance; 14. URGES NATO member states: a. to increase material and logistical aid to neighbouring countries that are hosting hundreds of thousands of Syrian refugees in order to improve their capability to deal with the refugee flows triggered by the Syrian crisis; b. to strengthen co-operation with the UN in logistical and humanitarian matters in order to improve conditions in refugee camps in neighbouring countries; 15. CALLS UPON the Syrian regime: a. to end the violence against the Syrian people and strictly observe the principles of humanitarian law and in particular to implement UN Security Council Resolutions 2139 and 2165 in order to guarantee humanitarian access and delivery; b. to engage in a meaningful dialogue with all actors of the Syrian opposition willing to negotiate in order to achieve a viable political compromise; 16. CALLS UPON the government of the Russian Federation to cease its attacks on the Syrian opposition and civilians immediately and to focus its efforts on fighting Daesh, to co-ordinate its efforts with the international coalition against Daesh and to promote a solution to the conflict through a political transition; 17. CALLS UPON the government and parliament of Iraq and all relevant parties of the country to build upon recent positive efforts to foster inter-ethnic and inter-sectarian reconciliation and to work together closely to defeat Daesh and other extremist groups, and put an end to human rights violations; 18. CALLS UPON all parties to the Libyan dialogue to agree to a swift and conclusive approval of the final text of a political agreement as presented by UN SRSG Bernardino León, to end the violent confrontation to the benefit of all Libyans and so that the new Government of National Accord can be formed without further delay; 19. ENCOURAGES the governments and parliaments of the MENA region: a. to fully back international efforts to defeat Daesh and other violent extremist organisations, to block the flow of foreign fighters to the region and stem the spread of extremist ideologies and terrorism; b. to use their influence to encourage political solutions to the conflicts in the region and to refrain from any action that might heighten tensions and aggravate the situation; c. to work together in bringing the belligerents in Yemen to the negotiation table to ensure full implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 2216 (2015), and to assist them in reaching a political settlement that leads to lasting peace.