Save our sacred forests!

Similar documents
DEVELOPMENT, LAND ACQUISITION AND DISPLACEMENT IN JHARKHAND

ITL PUBLIC SCHOOL Pre-SA2 ( ) Social Science Handout Class VIII Subject: Civics CHAPTER- LAW AND SOCIAL JUSTICE

MLDRIN ECHUCA DECLARATION

Printer Friendly Version

Background Briefing on NGO concerns over the revision of the World Bank s Resettlement Policy issued by the Forest Peoples Programme

CAMBODIA: A case for moratorium on the sale of indigenous lands

Sowing Seeds of Solidarity:

What a place to have a trade union event! The strong labour history of Liverpool is very present and sets a perfect working tone to our congress.

COMMUNITY RESERVES AND CONSERVATION RESERVES: MORE RESERVE AND LESS COMMUNITY!

INDIAN ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS:

Appendix B: Using Laws to Fight for Environmental Rights

Forest people forced off their land in the name of conservation

Indigenous People: A perspective from Gujarat Xavier Manjooran 1 SJ

THE HILL TRIBES OF NORTHERN THAILAND: DEVELOPMENT IN CONFLICT WITH HUMAN RIGHTS - REPORT OF A VISIT IN SEPTEMBER 1996

Community Empowerment Towards Ensuring Child Rights. Intervention By JAAG

Adivasi Women and Mining In India: A Handbook for Adivasi Women and NGOs Involved in Campaigns for the Rights of Mining Affected Adivasi Communities

If we are made to part with our Hills and starve, all of you bear a responsibility.

Cambodian Clean Sugar Campaign. Resisting illegal land grabbing, forest conversion and human rights abuses by the sugar industry in Cambodia

Workshop: Human Rights and Development-Induced Displacement Concept Note

7 TH PRO BONO ENVIRO MOOT PROBLEM- 2013

THE TANZANIAN LAND ACTS, 1999: AN ANALYSIS OF THE ANALYSES. Robin Palmer Land Policy Adviser, Africa Oxfam GB. March 1999

SC stalls Vedanta's BMP, Gram Sabhas to decide forest rights

Why has the recent surge of foreign land acquisitions and leases been dubbed a global land grab?

ANTI HUMAN TRAFFICKING PROGRAM (A.H.T) Under the Diocese of Durgapur Church of North India REPORT

Comparative Analysis of Bangladesh s Legal Framework and ADB Safeguard Policy Statement: Indigenous Peoples

Indigenous Peoples' Declaration on Extractive Industries. Indigenous Peoples Declaration on Extractive Industries

An informal aid. for reading the Voluntary Guidelines. on the Responsible Governance of Tenure. of Land, Fisheries and Forests

Declaration of the Rights of the Free and Sovereign People of the Modoc Indian Tribe (Mowatocknie Maklaksûm)

Summary case study on the situation of Golden Veroleum Liberia s oil palm concession

INDIA S MINING REGULATION

Annex 2: Does the Xayaburi resettlement comply with Lao law?

PESA ACT -BACKGROUND

Analysis paper on the ceasefire process between the Karenni National Progressive Party (KNPP) and the Burmese government in the last six months

The Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous People - Access to Justice. Cambodia Indigenous Youth Association (CIYA)

URI was formed in 2000, uniting people from more than 100 spiritual traditions in ongoing interfaith cooperation; today we bridge more than

Tapping Indigenous Wisdom In Helping Chart The Future We Want

Focus Group Discussion

EBRD Performance Requirement 5

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2009 JHARKHAND STATE HOUSING BOARD APPELLANT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P. (PIL) No of Versus CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS.

Pages What is cultural diffusion? 2. What is diversity?

SALEM DECLARATION (PROCLAMATION)

Over 100 armed Kenya Forest Guards (KFS) were deployed to Tangul KFS camp in Embobut forest. They brought great fear to our community:

NELSON CITY COUNCIL BURIAL AND CREMATION BYLAWS

A lot of attention had been focussed in the past

Pangolin Asia Fund January 2017 NAV

NREGA in Abu Road, Rajasthan

Struggles for Equality

INTRODUCTION PANCHAYAT RAJ

EXCHANGE ON INCLUSION OF PASTORAL CODE IN THE NEW DRAFT LAND LAW IN MONGOLIA

Chapter 5. Development and displacement: hidden losers from a forgotten agenda

This document is available at AIR1997SC1071, 1997(2)SCALE493, (1997)3SCC549, [1997]2SCR728

Soil and Watershed Conservation Act, 2039(1982)

FILM DISCUSSION GUIDE

INDIA COAL SECTOR ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MITIGATION PROJECT (CREDIT NO IN)

INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMITTEE ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND GENETIC RESOURCES TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE AND FOLKLORE

DON T MINE US OUT OF EXISTENCE BAUXITE MINE AND REFINERY DEVASTATE LIVES IN INDIA A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT IS A HUMAN RIGHT

What is most important is that because China is a regional power, it should set an example for the region. Chinese Teachers, Cambodian Students

Power of the law, power to the people: pursuing innovative legal strategies in human rights advocacy

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ---- W.P.(C)

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA NATIONAL FORESTS AMENDMENT BILL

Do Trees have Rights?

Launch Address of Mr Tom Calma. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission

Somewhere between Rhetoric and Reality: Environmental Constitutionalism and the Rights of Nature in Ecuador and Bolivia

Center for the Study of American Business

NATIVE CUSTOMARY RIGHST (NCR) OVER LAND IN SARAWAK, MALAYSIA. By Baru Bian Advocate & Solicitor High Court, of Sarawak & Sabah MALAYSIA

Armenia. Essential QuestionsHow have issues such as

We re Generation Now, Children of the Future, Earth Revolution

INDIA : ORISSA CYCLONE

module1 ANSWERS TO Unit 1 Development ACTIVITIES ACTIVITY 1 ACTIVITY 2 ACTIVITY 3 Hint

INDIGENOUS PEOPLES' PLAN OF IMPLEMENTATION ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

GENDER ISSUES IN ARTISANAL AND SMALL-SCALE MINING COMMUNITIES IN WAU/BULOLO AREAS OF MOROBE PROVINCE IN PAPUA NEW GUINEA COMMUNITY PERSPECTIVE.

Forest Peoples Programme

Tribal Women Experiencing Panchayati Raj Institution in India with Special Reference to Arunachal Pradesh

Indira Sagar Dam. Rs crore but expected to be nearly Rs. 5,000 crore Loss

Neo-Liberalism and Adivasi: A Study about Deprivation

What Union Membership Means To Me

Statement by President Trump on the Paris Climate Accord

An Implication of Three Tier Panchayati Raj vs PESA-1996 in Scheduled Areas of Sundargarh (A short vision of Katang Gram Panchayat)

The community members asked Mr Patrick Caruso: Don t you understand that this project leads to bloodshed in our community?

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF COMMUNITY-BASED DISASTER PREPAREDNESS. Alex Joseph, Discipleship Centre

Special edition, March 2009

*Suggestions for State Budget *

Name: Class: Date: Contemporary Global Issues: Reading Essentials and Study Guide: Lesson 2

the land records to the competent authority, whenever required. (4) The competent authority shall cause the substance of the notification to be publis

Thirunelly Tribal Special Intervention Programme

RULES FOR BUSINESS RIGHTS FOR PEOPLE ASIA IN FOCUS

ACT. To reform the law on forests; to repeal certain laws; and to provide for related matters.

Human Rights-based Approach & Rural Advisory Services

REHABILITATION & RESETTLEMENT ISSUES IN COAL MINING PROJECT A CASE STUDY

Government and Public Land Management in Nepal

Economic and Social Council

Which sub- Saharan African countries are attracting the most interest?

Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006

Thematic Report on Freedom of Association and Peaceful Assembly in the context of the exploitation of natural resources

MEMORANDUM. Members of the Agriculture Committee. Susan R. Grogan Chief Planner. Date: June 5, June 16, 2015 Committee meeting

4 Rebuilding a World Economy: The Post-war Era

SUBJECT : MANAGEMENT OF OVERLAPPING PROTECTED AREAS AND/OR THEIR BUFFER ZONES AND ANCESTRAL DOMAINS/ LANDS

Chinese regulations ensured China had favorable balance of trade with other nations Balance of trade: difference between how much a country imports

Declarations of Oruro Gathering on Environmental Justice and Mining in Latin America Monday April 9, :16 PM Oruro, Bolivia, March 9-11, 2007

Transcription:

Indigenous movement in Jharkhand challenges plans for industrial development that threaten Adivasi forests, farmlands and way of life by Tom Griffiths February 2007 Like State governments in many other parts of India, the government of Jharkhand State is planning large-scale industrial expansion across the entire region in the name of development and poverty reduction. To the dismay and disillusionment of mass movements in Jharkhand, newly elected government officials plan to uphold agreements struck by the previous State government with leading steel and mining companies. In return for 169,198 Crore Rupees (c. US$3.8 billion) of investment, these agreements promise companies massive land acquisition for their mines and steel plants, which will deforest no less than 57,000 hectares of forest and displace 9,615 families, many of them located in legally protected Scheduled Areas set aside for indigenous Adivasi peoples in the State. Official government plans for rapid growth of mega-steel and factories and associated mining development threaten forests and the traditional lands of indigenous peoples across Jharkhand.

In Ranchi District, for example, the UK company Arcelor Mittal plans to take over tribal land and forests in Karra Block to develop a huge steel plant with backing from the State government. The whole plan has been developed without consultation and without the prior consent of the affected Adivasi people in direct violation of legal protections for indigenous peoples, including the 5 th Schedule, the Chotanagpur Tenancy Act (1908) and the Samata Judgment. Indigenous and mass social movements in Jharkhand have mobilised to challenge these official plans for massive industrial development across the State. Peoples movements are categorically saying no to industry-related displacement and they reject interference in their local affairs and decision-making by company community liaison officers or political party activists and politicians. In Karra Block, the Adivasi people have started a campaign to save their traditional lands and forest and have formed a campaign organisation called Ottehasa Horo Sangathan (Organisation of People of the Earth). Udikel village is one of the 144 communities threatened with displacement where the people have organised themselves to oppose topdown development. Nandi Pahan, leader of Udikel Panchayat, affirms that his community will never exchange their forests and fields for industrial development: Everything is here on our traditional land: our homes, our fields, our forests, our burial grounds and ceremonial sites. This land is sacred for us. This is where we hold our Baha (flower feast) festival and other ceremonies. The forest has our special sarna prayer places. So, our land is part of our way of life. We will not give up our land. If we surrender our lands: what will we eat? Where will go to plant our crops? He is backed up by other leaders of the community: The forest is of great importance to us. We gather fruits like karanj from the forest and medicines. We collect minor forest produce for sale. We have our orchards where we grow mangoes and tamarind. We use the forest to get construction materials for our houses and to make tools, including our agricultural implements. How can a factory replace all this? It is our culture and our livelihood. We cannot and will not give this up this land [Devar Pahan, Udikel Village] The head of Udikel Panchayat and his adviser stand next to a sarna prayer place located in sacred forest groves which are threatened with destruction by steel plant development by Arcelor Mittal Steel Company. 2

When we found out that Mittal was planning to establish a steel plant here we organised ourselves. All the villages decided that we would not allow the development on our lands because the plant would displace all of us. [Arnan Hemrom, Secretary, Udikel Gram Panchayat] The head of Udikel Panchayat and his colleagues holding the banner which reads: Jai sarna jai Jharkhand. Jameen bachav sangathan janm jug se hamara jameen, hai Jameen bachav sangathan, gram Udikel Save Our Land Committee says: Long live our sacred groves! Long live Jharkhand! This has been our land since time immemorial. Udikel Village does not give up its land and forest! In Seraikella Karshwan District mining and steel companies have put pressure on Adivasi villages to give up their traditional lands and forests for development. No less than 39 villages in 4 Panchayats in the District report that Company agents have visited them in recent years to try to persuade them to give up their forests for mining. Dalvangar Panchayat, for example, has been under constant pressure to open its lands up to limestone mining and has only stopped harassment by company agents following a massive protest rally against the proposed mine. In Rugudi Panchayat, Magila L Phonta Ltd has applied for a permit to mine gold that would affect Ramdih and Mutugarha villages. Here too, villagers have opposed these plans and rejected approaches from company agents, partly by organising numerous rallies in 2005 and 2006 to protest against unwanted mining development on their lands. 3

Natural sal forests on the collective ancestral Khuntkatti lands of the Mundari people in Seraikella District, Jharkhand. This valley is threatened by goldmining development, which local Adivasi communities, their traditional authorities and their Panchayats strongly oppose The people organised a large gherao (siege protest) at the offices of the Deputy Commissioner and a memorandum was been passed to him affirming that companies must be stopped from entering Khuntkatti (legally recognised collective land and forest) areas and mining must be stopped because it will have harmful impacts on people s livelihoods and will damage the forest, pollute water sources, weaken the Khuntkatti system and cause displacement and migration. Indigenous leaders in the District stress that their hero Birsa Munda sacrificed his life to get the Khuntkatti lands recognised and these lands must not be broken up and sold off. They affirm: We will not break up our Khuntkatti lands. We will never take action that will mean Birsa Munda died in vain! The grassroots movement against destructive and top-down development also maintain that they are fed up with company officials trying to persuade them to sell off or lease their lands for mining and other development: This Khuntkatti is where we have lived for generations. Before, we were unaware that the companies were coming or that they wanted our traditional lands. But now they keep coming and offering the people money and more money, and promising us facilities. This is what we face today. About a year ago a company agent attended a meeting of the Gram Sabah and told the people that the Chief Minister had invited L N Mittal to invest in Jharkhand. The agent regularly attended our meetings and told the people that they would receive help with road building and schools and people would get jobs. This man kept interrupting our meetings so we passed a resolution prohibiting company agents from being present in our meetings without invitation. But the man continued to disturb our meetings. So the people organised a big rally to protest against this outside interference in our local government. Since then the company has stopped harassing us, but it is now informally pressing some villagers to accept development on our lands. They are using these middlemen in the villages to try to change the minds of their neighbours. But the people are very much united. Rolahatu Panchayat has now passed a resolution with all 14 villages affirming that they will not allow industrial and mining development on their Khuntkatti lands. [Patra Hassa, Attra Village, Rolahatu Panchayat] 4

Members of Dalbhanga Village, Bhhuihari Khuntkatti with activists of Jharkhand Save the Forest Movement who collectively oppose mining development on traditional forest lands in Seraikella Karshwan District (the statue of hero Birsa Munda is in the background, decorated after the annual celebration of his birthday (15 th November) all over Jharkhand State). We do not want to surrender our land and customary rights to anybody whether it is the government or private companies. Our land and our forest are the source of life for our communities. For us, the forest and the land is everything! We will never allow companies or the State to take them away from us! [Mangal Singh, Batani village, Torandih Panchayat] If the mining companies come this place will become like Kalapani Island (remote and lonely): it will be like hell. It will become a miserable place. All the greenery will be gone and our land will be lost. Our health will be damaged and our medicinal plants will be destroyed. The company may promise to replace our forest, but these will be poisonous trees that will suck the water from our land. Those trees (eucalyptus) are no use to anyone here. Not to humans and not to animals. This is why we will not give up our rights [Ghopal Singh Munda, Siyadia village, Rugudi Panchayat, Buchei Block, Bakas Mundari Khuntkatti and General Secretary of Samiti Rakshe Evam Vikas] 5