Central Iowa Collaborative Collections Initiative (CI-CCI) Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)

Similar documents
Update on EAST Policies

Eastern Academic Scholars Trust. Memorandum of Understanding

October (hereinafter the MoU ) between

The Florida Library Information Network. The FLIN Manual

COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN NEVADA College Library Services Internal Audit Report July 1, 2009 through April 30, 2010

NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM LIBRARY COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT

Iowa State University Library COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT POLICY United States Government Publications

Story City Historical Society (SCHS) Collections Management Policy

Jefferson College Library

Amended and Restated Bylaws National Weather Association

EURIG Cooperation Agreement

Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Concerning the FLorida Academic REpository (FLARE) [FINAL Modified 4/3/2013]

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA SECRETARY OF STATE ARTICLES OF DISSOLUTION

DRAFT COPYRIGHT REGULATIONS 2015 ARRANGEMENT OF REGULATIONS. PART I Preliminary and Definitions. The Copyright Register PART III

KYOTO PROTOCOL TO THE UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE

Northern Waters Library Service Merlin Consortium Bylaws

MICHIGAN HEALTH SCIENCES LIBRARIES ASSOCIATION BYLAWS. (Revised 2013)

Ameri- can Thoracic Society, 1. Key definitions Authorized Users Outsource Provider Effective Date Fee Licensed Material Licensee

Orbis Cascade Alliance Memorandum of Understanding

The Bisbee Restoration Association and Historical Society, Inc. Collections Management Policy MISSION

Collection Development Policy Federal Government Documents Ouachita Baptist University Library

Family and Medical Leave-Qualifying Exigency

LAW ON THE ELECTION OF MEMBERS OF THE PARLIAMENT

E-Verify Solutions effective January 2015 page 1

1. Policy Statement. 2. Purpose of Policy.

Circulation Policies And Procedures

Memorandum and Articles of Association of Hull University Union Limited

KYOTO PROTOCOL TO THE UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE. Final draft by the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole

National Historic Preservation Act of 1966

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES - BOARD OF DIRECTORS SWATARA VILLAGE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. APPROVED BY BOD AUGUST 20, 2015

HON. G. KEITH CARY FAMILY LAW DIVISION - A 1700 MONROE STREET FORT MYERS FLORIDA Telephone Number Fax Number

1 ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS IN CONTRACTUAL TRANSACTIONS 2 DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 PART 1 4 GENERAL PROVISIONS

-MENDOCINO COUNTY PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES- DIVISION III OF TITLE 20 MENDOCINO TOWN ZONING CODE

BYLAWS OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WATCH AND CLOCK COLLECTORS, INC., A Pennsylvania Non-Profit Corporation Amended 4/1/2017

The Old Kings Head Angling Club

Subscriber Registration Agreement. Signing up is as easy as 1, 2, 3...

ReliabilityFirst Corporation Reliability Standards Development Procedure Version 4

Collection Development Policy

RESNA Policies and Procedures for the Development of RESNA Assistive Technology Standards February 17, 2016

Definitions. Misconduct in Research

IC Chapter 14. Amendment of Articles of Incorporation

Rulebook. Revised as of: July 27, DTCC Data Repository (U.S.) LLC

LIBRARY LICENSE AGREEMENT - DATABASE

GUIDELINE FOR PROTECTION OF PERSONAL INFORMATION

RESOLUTION MSC.375(93) (adopted on 22 May 2014) AMENDMENTS TO THE PROTOCOL OF 1988 RELATING TO THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON LOAD LINES, 1966, AS

INTERNAL REGULATIONS

INFORMATION DISSEMINATION POLICY STATEMENT

AMENDMENT TO REVISED UNIFORM LAW ON NOTARIAL ACTS*

Midwest Reliability Organization

FOREST PARK PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC. (FPPOA) BY-LAWS

As Amended by Senate Committee SENATE BILL No. 46

SOUTH AFRICA Trade Marks regulations Government Notice R578 of 21 April 1995 as amended by Government Notice R1180 of 1 December 2006

Maine Shared Collections Strategy's Interim Performance Report Year 3

Privacy Impact Assessment Update for the. E-Verify RIDE. DHS/USCIS/PIA-030(b) May 6, 2011

2 The Agreement entered into force, pursuant to Article 25, on 14 August 1978.

PART THREE CIVIL CASES

RULE 4. Candidate Petitions. (Enacted 6/06/12)

Introduction to Records New Clerk Academy

TOWNSHIP OF LEBANON COUNTY OF HUNTERDON ORDINANCE NO

Memorandum and Articles of Association of

MEMORANDUM. Library Fax

Equipment Loan and Collaboration Agreement. Between. Company Name. and the. University of Florida Board of Trustees

RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER OF THE CITY OF PUYALLUP, WASHINGTON CHAPTER I: HEARINGS ON PERMIT APPLICATIONS

2.2 This AGREEMENT applies to all annexations that are approved after the effective date of this AGREEMENT.

RULE 5. Initiated Ordinance Petitions. (Enacted 6/06/12)

PROCEDURES GUIDE AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE D20 TRAFFIC RECORDS VERSION 1.0 FOR

GRAINSTOREKEEPER PROCEDURES IN RESPECT OF THE ICE FUTURES UK FEED

Operating Procedures B65 Committee

S P P U R C H A S I N G S P WI- 03 P U R C H A S E O R D E R G T C DATE OF ISSUE: 15/11/2015 REVISION: 01

Checklist. Industry Requirements for E-Bonding Solutions. Based on Surety Association of Canada Vendor Guidelines

The Railways (Interoperability) Regulations 2011

Operating Procedures for Accredited Standards Committee C63 Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) Date of Preparation: 3 March 2016

Template Commission pursuant to Section 11 BDSG

Referred to Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections. SUMMARY Revises provisions governing elections. (BDR )

American National Standards (ANS) Processing Manual

ORANGE COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS 1300 S.GRAND AVENUE, BLDG. C SANTA ANA, CA (714)

KYOTO PROTOCOL TO THE UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE*

Taiwan Mobile Co., Ltd. ( the Company ) Rules of Procedure for Board of Directors Meetings

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 7 FAMILY LAW

SERC Regional Standards Development Procedure Exhibit C to the Amended and Restated Regional Entity Delegation Agreement between

OGC CONTRACTS PROCEDURES Effective Date: March 12, 2018

ANSI-Accredited Standards Developer

TRADE MARKS RULES, 1963.

KYOTO PROTOCOL TO THE UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATECHANGE

ELECTRONIC FILING STANDARDS IMPLEMENTING E-FILING PROGRAM 4 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT CLINTON COUNTY, IL

BY-LAWS. Article 1 Duties. Section 1

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT, PREBLE COUNTY, OHIO ENTRY

Assumption of TOBT Responsibility and Usage Agreement HAM CSA

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING MD 410 KIPLINGER PROPERTY PARCEL 1INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING. by and between

CHAPTER 1 RECORDS RETENTION AND DISPOSITION

GOVERNANCE 1. SCOPE AND AUTHORITY OF POLICY 2. THE MAJLIS 3. MOSQUE MANAGEMENT BOARD 4. ETHICS AND CONFLICT OF INTEREST

PROJET DE LOI ENTITLED. The Protection of Investors. (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law, 2018 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

NORTHERN IOWA STUDENT GOVERNMENT ELECTION RULES

The DFSA Rulebook. Recognition (REC)

American Water Works Association (AWWA) Standards Program Operating Procedures

CONSTITUTION FOR THE ATHENS REGIONAL LIBRARY SYSTEM

A6: Joint Powers Agreement Draft

THIS AGREEMENT is dated the day of 2012 (the Effective Date )

Retention Schedules For Local Government Paper & Electronic Records

Approved by Commissioner: LATEST REVISION: August 15, 2012

Transcription:

Central Iowa Collaborative Collections Initiative (CI-CCI) Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Mission Statement The purpose of the CI-CCI is to enhance and sustain the availability of scholarly information for the combined user community of the group. The collaboration will strive to model effective best practice for cooperative collections and resource sharing. Project Goals The project has four immediate goals: First, to responsibly reduce the size of local print collections by reducing duplication among the participating libraries so that library space may be freed up for other uses. Second, to create and maintain a distributed, shared collection of these identified monograph titles to ensure that circulating copies of them are retained within the group, readily accessible to group participants as well as other libraries. Third, to coordinate acquisitions with the goal of developing a shared collection among the participants to reduce duplication, leverage acquisition funds, and to reduce the frequency for the necessity to do data refresh. Fourth, establish an environment where exploration and development of additional areas of collaboration can flourish (e.g., technology, etc.). Guiding Principles Participant libraries are committed to work together collaboratively to meet the Project Goals above for a minimum of 10 years (with options for review, renewal and dissolution as outlined below). We recognize that some of the specifics of this collaboration including the number of print titles covered, the participating libraries involved and details of responsibilities are likely to change over time and that adjustments will be desirable. The MOU commitment is to work in consultation with each other for 10 years to responsibly, collaboratively and transparently manage the shared print collection that is a result of our joint withdrawal and retention actions. Duration of agreement Libraries agree to work together collaboratively to meet the Project Goals of the project for a minimum of 10 years from the start of the original agreement (2013) unless this agreement is dissolved or superseded by the mutual agreement of a simple majority of the participants. The length of this agreement may be extended at the end of the original period by mutual agreement of the group. Review of the agreement, its terms and implications will occur at no less than three (3) year intervals, or when a request is supported by a simple majority of full participant libraries.

Release from or renegotiation of agreement terms An individual institution may be released from the agreement or modify its retention list for reasons beyond the library s control such as a disaster, financial exigency, or a university mandate. Should an institution need to withdraw from the group, that library is expected to work in good faith with the remaining participants to address the resultant implications. This is expected to include providing ample written notice of withdrawal (six months where possible), supplying the library s retention list and identifying redistribution options among the remaining group members. Governance and Administration The collaboration shall be governed by a Directors Committee composed of each Library s senior administrator and any other designated personnel. However, each institution has one vote on issues concerning the collaboration. The Directors and key personnel will meet at least once per year and may elect to meet more often. The annual meeting will be at a mutually agreed upon date and location and will focus on planning, assessment, and conflict resolution. The Directors Committee may appoint task forces to investigate specific issues. The task force members will be appointed by the Directors Committee. Each Director will appoint a member or members from his or her own institution to these task forces. Task forces will meet as needed. Task force meetings will be led by representatives appointed by Directors Committee. Current participants Central College Drake University Grand View University Grinnell College Simpson College University of Northern Iowa Addition of new participant libraries New participant libraries will agree to the mission and goals of the collaboration spelled out in the MOU. Generally new participant libraries will be added at a data refresh. Libraries that match their holdings against the shared collection prior to a refresh are required to contribute their library holdings at the next data refresh. When those libraries receive their retention lists and assume responsibility, including physical verification, for retention titles in the shared collection, they become full participants in the shared collection. Full participant libraries may vote on issues relating to the MOU and the shared collection. Prior to that, representatives may attend meetings as nonvoting delegates. Description and Maintenance of the Shared Print Collection This agreement covers the set of retention titles identified by criteria that was developed in the 2013 Sustainable Collection Services (SCS) deselection project. The group data analysis of collective holdings and individual title circulation resulted in the identification of potential withdrawal titles

and retention titles. These titles were assigned by mutual agreement. The goal is to have a proportional distribution of titles as well as maintaining two copies of every item, except in the case of older and low use titles. The agreement also includes circulating print materials purchased after July 2015. The list of the titles a school is responsible for maintaining is called the retention list. This agreement excludes library materials not specifically contained on retention lists or allocated withdrawal lists developed during the project. 1. Ownership and location of resources Where possible, two print copies of each retention title will be retained in a shared print collection distributed among the participant libraries. The two copies will be maintained at two separate designated participant libraries that already own and have recorded holdings of the title. In the case low use titles (currently pre-1991 publications), for which 1 copy will be retained, the holding library will physically verify that they own the item and it is in lending condition. Once an item has been verified it will be stamped and identified in the MARC record as being a retention title as outlined in the Acquisitions Addendum. Libraries will maintain ownership of their designated retention titles. Retention titles will be housed in facilities operated or shared by the owning library at the expense of that library. 2. Maintenance of the shared collection Each library will use their best effort to maintain, house, preserve, and make available the titles on its respective retention list for the duration of this agreement. Libraries will not be held accountable for regular inventorying of their retention titles but are encouraged to do this when possible as a best practice. 3. Protection of retention list titles Each library is expected to take appropriate local steps to protect their retention titles from discard as outlined in the Acquisitions Addendum. The aim is to facilitate data refresh and also to create the potential for all participants to identify retention items in OCLC or alternative shared discovery system. 4. Retention facilities, maintenance requirements, physical handling Libraries are expected to treat retention titles with the same or better care as other materials in their collections as regards physical handling, circulation, repairs and restoration. 5. Circulation Retention copies are expected to circulate. No effort will be made to identify and monitor a preservation copy. All titles will be searchable in OCLC and available as outlined in the Interlibrary Loan Addendum. 6. Damaged, lost, missing and replacement copies Libraries are expected to follow their usual workflows and procedures for identifying, repairing and replacing retention list titles. They will make a good faith effort to respond to badly damaged (unloanable) or lost titles in a way that displays sound judgment in the context of the particular title

and its availability to other libraries in the state. 7. Notification about non-replacement or discard of retention titles If a participating library knowingly elects not to replace a lost or badly damaged retention list title or if it replaces a retention title with a later edition it must notify the other participant libraries annually through an agreed standard notification mechanism; adhering to last copy standards. This will allow other participants, or the group as a whole to determine if they want to take further replacement actions. It also provides a mechanism by which the group can monitor and assess losses to the shared collection. 8. Data refresh Libraries may choose to take part in a data refresh with updated circulation data and additional libraries holdings at regular intervals. It may also provide opportunities to redistribute retention loads. Participant libraries will not be required to refresh their data. If a library elects not to refresh they will not be held responsible for retaining additional titles. They will remain responsible for their existing retention titles unless notified that the refresh has resulted in the removal of titles from their retention list. Revised: October 2015

By signature below, the following official representatives acknowledge having read and understood the agreement and document and agree to be bound by its terms and conditions. Approved: