Art. 61. Troops that give no quarter have no right to kill enemies already disabled on the ground, or prisoners captured by other troops.

Similar documents
Nuremberg Tribunal. London Charter. Article 6

Nuremberg Charter (Charter of the International Military Tribunal) (1945)

Rights in the Postwar World

In witness whereof the undersigned have signed the present Agreement.

London Agreement (8 August 1945)

Text of the Nürnberg Principles Adopted by the International Law Commission

THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMES (TRIBUNALS) ACT, 1973

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT

PRINCIPLES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW RECOGNIZED IN THE CHARTER OF THE NÜRNBERG TRIBUNAL AND IN THE JUDGMENT OF THE TRIBUNAL

THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMES (TRIBUNALS) ACT, 1973

CHAPTER 1 BASIC RULES AND PRINCIPLES

The Regime of Absolute Sovereignty

Rights in the Postwar World. (1) The United Na8ons, 1945 (2) The Universal Declara8on of Human Rights, 1948 (3) The Bandung Conference, 1955

Draft of an Act to Introduce the Code of Crimes against International Law

THE HOSTAGES TRIAL TRIAL OF WILHELM LIST AND OTHERS UNITED STATES MILITARY TRIBUNAL, NUREMBERG. 8 th JULY, 1947, TO 19 th FEBRUARY, 1948

Charter of the United Na7ons (1945)

Adjudica(ng War Crimes

COLLECTION OF DOCUMENTS ON THE LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT

INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL FOR THE FAR EAST

Lesson 8 Legal Frameworks for Civil-Military-Police Relations

(Statute of the International Tribunal for Rwanda)

THE LAW OF LAND WARFARE

NETHERLANDS. International Crimes Act

ACT ON THE PUNISHMENT OF CRIMES WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT

STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA

UNITED NATIONS OFFICE OF LEGAL AFFAIRS

Name Date MOD. [Slide 3] Universal Declaration of Human Rights UN document affirming

RUSSIA & UKRAINE: INTERNATIONAL LAW AND SELF DETERMINATION. Patrick McGuiness

Bangladesh War Crimes Tribunal A Wolf in Sheep s Clothing? By Steven Kay QC 1

EU GUIDELINES on INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW

Act of 5 August 2003 on serious violations of international humanitarian law

The Lieber Code INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF ARMIES OF THE UNITED STATES IN THE FIELD. General Orders No promulgated on April 24, 1863

1. 4. Legal Framework for United Nations Peacekeeping. L e s s o n

International humanitarian law and the protection of war victims

Israel, Military Prosecutor v. Kassem and Others

THE MARTENS CLAUSE AND INTERNATIONAL CRIMES IN ESTONIA

The Lieber Code of 1863

Measures undertaken by the Government of Romania in order to disseminate and implement the international humanitarian law

Dear students: This presentation is a text version of the presentation that was given in lecture # 1, since presentations with certain animations

Civil Society Draft Bill for the Special Tribunal for Kenya

Article I. There shall be established after consultation with the Control Council for Germany an International Military Tribunal for the trial of war

International Law and the Use of Armed Force by States

Modified Objectives. Flight path preview. Conflict Classification (plus a little extra) Know the three categories of armed conflict

PROVISIONS OF THE SPANISH CRIMINAL CODE CONCERNING INTERNATIONAL CRIMES

Charter of the United Nations and Statute of the International Court of Justice

COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Chapter 2: Persons of Concern to UNHCR

$100 People. WWII and Cold War. The man who made demands at Yalta who led to the dropping of the "iron curtain" around the eastern European countries.

Charter of the United Nations

Week # 2 Targeting Principles & Human Shields

Charter United. Nations. International Court of Justice. of the. and Statute of the

INTERNATIONAL LAW AND INSTITUTIONS International Law Regarding the Conduct of War - Mark A. Drumbl INTERNATIONAL LAW REGARDING THE CONDUCT OF WAR

CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS

Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armies in the Field. Geneva, 27 July (List of Contracting Parties)

Objectives To explore the meanings of conflict and war. To make deductions and practise reasoning skills.

PCNICC/2000/WGCA/INF/1

Wartime Conferences T H E E A R L Y C O L D W A R

The Evolution of International Humanitarian Law (IHL) Understanding How Morals Have Changed War

A/HRC/32/L.5/Rev.1. General Assembly. ORAL REVISION 1 July. United Nations

War and Geography 4/13/2011. U.S. Navy Aircraft Carrier

REAFFIRMING the principle of non-interference in the internal affairs of other states;

Myanmar: International Human Rights Commitments

WARM UP: Today s Topics What were the major turning points. in WW2? How did the Allies compromise with one another?

Targeting People: Direct Participation in the Conduct of Hostilities DR. GENTIAN ZYBERI NORWEGIAN CENTRE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS UNIVERSITY OF OSLO

I. Introduction to the study guide 1. II. Abbreviations 1. III. Introductory specifications and definitions. 2

World War II. Benito Mussolini Adolf Hitler Fascism Nazi. Joseph Stalin Axis Powers Appeasement Blitzkrieg

D-Day Gives the Allies a Foothold in Europe

CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS. We the Peoples of the United Nations United for a Better World

5. Base your answer on the map below and on your knowledge of social studies.

Unit 7.4: World War II

Attacks on Medical Units in International Humanitarian and Human Rights Law

Draft Code of Offences against the Peace and Security of Mankind with commentaries 1954

The Cold War Abroad and at Home, Chapter AP US History

CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS With introductory note and Amendments

Introduction to the Khmer Rouge Tribunal. Janet Lee and Karen Yookyung Choi. Edited by Héleyn Uñac, Legal Training Coordinator

The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia

15-3: Fascism Rises in Europe 15-4: Aggressors Invade Nations

Module 2: LEGAL FRAMEWORK

Reach Kram. We, Preah Bat Samdech Preah Norodom Sihanouk King of Cambodia,

Fordham International Law Journal

The University of Edinburgh. From the SelectedWorks of Ray Barquero. Ray Barquero, Mr., University of Edinburgh. Fall October, 2012

Accession (a)/ Succession (d) Relevant Laws Constitution of 21 September 1964 Criminal Code of 10 June 1854 Police Act of 10 February 1961

2012 The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History Excerpts from Ex Parte Quirin (underlining added for emphasis).

Implementation of International Humanitarian Law. Dr. Benarji Chakka Associate Professor

THE ARMS TRADE TREATY AND

NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT: AN OVERVIEW OF CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW

Appendix II Draft comprehensive convention against international terrorism

Standard Standard

FACT SHEET THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT

InternationalHumantarianLawIhLandtheConductofNonInternationalArmedConflictNiac

INTERNATIONAL LAW AND THE USE OF FORCE BY STATES

LESSON 1: YALTA, 1945 Student Handout 1: Problems

CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS

MacArthur Memorial Education Programs

Geneva Conventions Act 1993

UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court

CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS:

ANNEX I: APPLICABLE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK

ROME STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT

Transcription:

Criminalizing War (1) Discovering crimes in war (2) Early attempts to regulate the use of force in war (3) International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg trial) (4) International Military Tribunal for the Far East (Tokyo trial)

Criminalizing War 1. U.S. Army Order No. 100 (Lieber Code), 1863 2. International Standing Committee for Aid to Wounded Soldiers (Red Cross), 1863, resulting in Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded in Armies in the Field, 1864 3. First Hague Peace Conference, 1899 4. Second Hague Peace Conference, 1907, resulting in Convention No. IV on laws and customs of war 5. Kellogg-Briand Pact, 1928 6. Geneva Convention, 1929 7. Charter of the United Nations, 1945 8. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948 9. Fourth Geneva Convention, 1949 10. Additional Protocols, 1977

Lieber Code (1863) Art. 56. A prisoner of war is subject to no punishment for being a public enemy, nor is any revenge wreaked upon him by the intentional infliction of any suffering, or disgrace, by cruel imprisonment, want of food, by mutilation, death, or any other barbarity. Art. 57. So soon as a man is armed by a sovereign government and takes the soldier's oath of fidelity, he is a belligerent; his killing, wounding, or other warlike acts are not individual crimes or offenses. No belligerent has a right to declare that enemies of a certain class, color, or condition, when properly organized as soldiers, will not be treated by him as public enemies.

Lieber Code (1863) Art. 60. It is against the usage of modern war to resolve, in hatred and revenge, to give no quarter. No body of troops has the right to declare that it will not give, and therefore will not expect, quarter; but a commander is permitted to direct his troops to give no quarter, in great straits, when his own salvation makes it impossible to cumber himself with prisoners. Art. 61. Troops that give no quarter have no right to kill enemies already disabled on the ground, or prisoners captured by other troops.

Lieber Code (1863) Art. 67. The law of nations allows every sovereign government to make war upon another sovereign state, and, therefore, admits of no rules or laws different from those of regular warfare, regarding the treatment of prisoners of war... Art. 68. Modern wars are not internecine wars, in which the killing of the enemy is the object. The destruction of the enemy in modern war, and, indeed, modern war itself, are means to obtain that object of the belligerent which lies beyond the war. Unnecessary or revengeful destruction of life is not lawful.

Lieber Code (1863) Art.71. Whoever intentionally inflicts additional wounds on an enemy already wholly disabled, or kills such an enemy, or who orders or encourages soldiers to do so, shall suffer death, if duly convicted, whether he belongs to the Army of the United States, or is an enemy captured after having committed his misdeed.

Criminalizing War 1. U.S. Army Order No. 100 (Lieber Code), 1863 2. International Standing Committee for Aid to Wounded Soldiers (Red Cross), 1863, resulting in Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded in Armies in the Field, 1864 3. First Hague Peace Conference, 1899 4. Second Hague Peace Conference, 1907, resulting in Convention No. IV on laws and customs of war 5. Kellogg-Briand Pact, 1928 6. Geneva Convention, 1929 7. Charter of the United Nations, 1945 8. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948 9. Fourth Geneva Convention, 1949 10. Additional Protocols, 1977

Kellogg-Briand Pact (1928) Article 1 The High Contracting Parties solemnly declare in the names of their respective peoples that they condemn recourse to war for the solution of international controversies, and renounce it, as an instrument of national policy in their relations with one another. Article 2 The High Contracting Parties agree that the settlement or solution of all disputes or conflicts of whatever nature or of whatever origin they may be, which may arise among them, shall never be sought except by pacific means.

Criminalizing War 1. U.S. Army Order No. 100 (Lieber Code), 1863 2. International Standing Committee for Aid to Wounded Soldiers (Red Cross), 1863, resulting in Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded in Armies in the Field, 1864 3. First Hague Peace Conference, 1899 4. Second Hague Peace Conference, 1907, resulting in Convention No. IV on laws and customs of war 5. Kellogg-Briand Pact, 1928 6. Geneva Convention, 1929 7. Charter of the United Nations, 1945 8. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948 9. Fourth Geneva Convention, 1949 10. Additional Protocols, 1977

Charter of the United Nations, 1945 Chapter 1: Purposes and Principles Article 4. All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.

Charter of the United Nations, 1945 Chapter 6: Pacific Settlement of Disputes Article 33, Paragraph 1. The parties to any dispute, the continuance of which is likely to endanger the maintenance of international peace and security, shall, first of all, seek a solution by negotiation, enquiry, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, judicial settlement, resort to regional agencies or arrangements, or other peaceful means of their own choice. Chapter 7: Action with Respect to Threats to the Peace, Breaches of the Peace, and Acts of Aggression Article 39. The Security Council shall determine the existence of any threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression and shall make recommendations, or decide what measures shall be taken...

Potsdam Conference, July 17-August 2,1945 Winston Churchill, Harry Truman, Joseph Stalin Clement Attlee, Harry Truman, Joseph Stalin

Nuremberg

Charter of the International Military Tribunal Article 6 (a) CRIMES AGAINST PEACE: namely, planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances, or participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the foregoing;

Charter of the International Military Tribunal Article 6 (b) WAR CRIMES: namely, violations of the laws or customs of war. Such violations shall include, but not be limited to, murder, ill-treatment or deportation to slave labor or for any other purpose of civilian population of or in occupied territory, murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war or persons on the seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity;

Charter of the International Military Tribunal Article 6 (c) CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY: namely, murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and other inhumane acts committed against any civilian population, before or during the war; or persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds in execution of or in connection with any crime within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, whether or not in violation of the domestic law of the country where perpetrated.

Tokyo