Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/13/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Similar documents
Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/22/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1

Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 01/30/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:15-cv LPS Document 118 Filed 05/10/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 2856 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:18-cv IMK Document 250 Filed 08/30/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 2905 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/13/16 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 01/19/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/22/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 09/30/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:18-cv LPS Document 1 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/07/16 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:10-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/05/10 Page 1 of 20

Case 1:16-cv RBK-JS Document 1 Filed 06/30/16 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 1

Case 1:10-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/25/10 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 01/15/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 03/27/18 Page 1 of 87 PageID #: 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 3:15-cv MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 38 PageID: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 3:16-cv MAS-LHG Document 1 Filed 09/16/16 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 3:18-cv FLW-LHG Document 1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 1 of 25 PageID: 1

Case 2:08-cv JLL-CCC Document 1 Filed 06/11/2008 Page 1 of 29 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 1:09-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 07/13/2009 Page 1 of 17

Case 2:15-cv WHW-CLW Document 1 Filed 04/10/15 Page 1 of 81 PageID: 1

Case 3:12-cv PGS-LHG Document 1 Filed 06/25/12 Page 1 of 41 PageID: 1

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 07/10/18 Page 1 of 218 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 1:09-cv JJF Document 36 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:15-cv RMB-JS Document 1 Filed 10/09/15 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 1:15-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/21/15 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:15-cv WHW-CLW Document 1 Filed 08/31/15 Page 1 of 145 PageID: 1

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 1:15-cv RGA Document 48 Filed 09/06/16 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 486 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:14-cv SLR-SRF Document 61 Filed 05/22/15 Page 1 of 20 PageID #: 634 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 01/20/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:11-cv WHW -MCA Document 7 Filed 09/12/11 Page 1 of 17 PageID: 57

Case 1:08-cv Document 1 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 1:10-cv UNA Document 6 Filed 08/16/10 Page 1 of 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 2:12-cv WHW-MCA Document 10 Filed 07/23/12 Page 1 of 20 PageID: 141

Case 1:11-cv LPS Document 497 Filed 05/20/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:06-cv JJF Document 1 Filed 05/03/06 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 224 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:12-cv SLR Document 18 Filed 08/27/12 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Attorneys for Defendants Watson Laboratories, Inc. and Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 12/08/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:10-cv GMS Document 1-3 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:11-cv EGS Document 10 Filed 04/25/12 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. ) C.A. No. ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

Case 3:10-cv JAP -TJB Document 1 Filed 08/16/10 Page 1 of 13 PageID: 1

Case 1:17-cv GMS Document 35 Filed 08/21/17 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 195 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/05/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

Case 1:11-cv RGA Document 10 Filed 01/13/12 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 47

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/09/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

Case 1:14-cv JMS-TAB Document 1 Filed 10/08/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 09/12/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT

Courthouse News Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 07/26/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 1:11-cv LPS Document 14 Filed 01/30/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:13-cv GMS Document 23 Filed 03/12/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 117 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) Plaintiff,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

COMPLAINT. Plaintiff, The Green Pet Shop Enterprises, LLC ( Green Pet Shop or. Plaintiff ), by and through its attorneys, THE RANDO LAW FIRM P.C.

Case 6:18-cv ADA Document 26 Filed 01/11/19 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/27/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT

PlainSite. Legal Document. Delaware District Court Case No. 1:13-cv Authentidate Holding Corp. v. My Health Inc. Document 1.

Case 1:10-cv MGC Document 11-1 Filed 11/18/10 Page 1 of 55 EXHIBIT A

Case 1:11-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 08/19/11 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:99-mc Document 417 Filed 05/23/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 3:10-cv FLW-DEA Document 48 Filed 09/27/11 Page 1 of 10 PageID: 1147 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 05/22/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

Case 2:09-cv DMC-MF Document 17 Filed 04/20/2009 Page 1 of 28 : :

Case 2:10-cv WHW-CLW Document 804 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 47723

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/13/16 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT NATURE OF THE ACTION

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Transcription:

Case 1:17-cv-00422-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/13/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE MILLENNIUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. Plaintiff, AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS LLC, Defendant. C.A. No. COMPLAINT Plaintiff Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., by its attorneys, alleges as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is an action for patent infringement under the patent laws of the United States, Title 35, United States Code, that arises out of the filing by Defendant Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC ( Amneal of Abbreviated New Drug Application ( ANDA No. 210049 with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ( FDA seeking approval to manufacture and sell a generic version of VELCADE for Injection prior to the expiration of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,713,446 and 6,958,319 (the Patents-in-Suit. PARTIES 2. Plaintiff Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ( Millennium is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its principal place of business at 40 Landsdowne Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139. Millennium is engaged in the business of developing, manufacturing, and selling pharmaceutical drug products, particularly for use in the therapeutic area of oncology.

Case 1:17-cv-00422-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/13/17 Page 2 of 13 PageID #: 2 3. Upon information and belief, Amneal is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, having a principal place of business at 400 Crossing Boulevard, 3rd Floor, Bridgewater, New Jersey 08807. 4. Upon information and belief, Amneal, itself and through its subsidiaries and agents, manufactures, distributes and/or imports generic drugs for sale and use throughout the United States, including in this judicial district. 5. Upon information and belief, following any FDA approval of ANDA No. 210049, Amneal, itself and through its subsidiaries and agents, will make, use, offer to sell, and/or sell the generic products that are the subject of ANDA No. 210049 throughout the United States, including in the State of Delaware, and/or import such generic products into the United States. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 6. This action arises under the patent laws of the United States of America and this Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331, 1338(a, 2201, and 2202. 7. Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391 and 1400(b. 8. This Court has jurisdiction over Amneal because, among other things, it is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware. Amneal is registered to conduct business in the State of Delaware, Department of State: Division of Corporations, under file number 3809030, and maintains as a registered agent, The Corporation Trust Company, registered at 1209 Orange St., Wilmington, DE 19801. 9. This Court also has personal jurisdiction over Amneal because, among other things, it has purposely availed itself of the rights and benefits of the laws of Delaware by engaging in systematic and continuous contacts with Delaware such that it should reasonably - 2 -

Case 1:17-cv-00422-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/13/17 Page 3 of 13 PageID #: 3 anticipate being haled into court here. On information and belief, Amneal has persistent, systematic and continuous contacts with Delaware as set forth below. 10. This Court has jurisdiction over Amneal because, among other things, of its appointment of an agent for service of process in the State of Delaware. 11. The court also has personal jurisdiction over Amneal because, among other things, it has committed, or aided, abetted, contributed to and/or participated in the commission of, a tortious act of patent infringement that has led to foreseeable harm and injury to Millennium, a Delaware corporation, which manufactures VELCADE for Injection for sale and use throughout the United States, including the State of Delaware. This Court also has personal jurisdiction over Amneal by virtue of, among other things, their systematic and continuous contacts with Delaware as set forth below. 12. Upon information and belief, Amneal, itself and through its subsidiaries and agents, currently manufactures and distributes for sale drug products throughout the United States, including in this judicial district. 13. Upon information and belief, Amneal routinely files ANDAs seeking FDA approval to market its drug products in the United States. 14. Upon information and belief, Amneal derives substantial revenue from generic pharmaceutical products that are sold, used, and/or consumed within Delaware. 15. Upon information and belief, Amneal will manufacture, market, and/or sell within the United States the generic version of VELCADE for Injection described in ANDA No. 210049 if FDA approval is granted. If ANDA No. 210049 is approved, the generic version of VELCADE for Injection charged with infringing the Patent-in-Suit, would, among other things, be marketed and distributed in Delaware, prescribed by physicians practicing in - 3 -

Case 1:17-cv-00422-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/13/17 Page 4 of 13 PageID #: 4 Delaware, and/or used by persons in Delaware, all of which would have a substantial effect on Delaware. 16. Amneal has taken advantage of the jurisdiction of this Court by filing claims and counterclaims before this Court and/or consenting to personal jurisdiction, including in, e.g., Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., 1:17-cv-00074 (D. Del.. BACKGROUND 17. United States Patent No. 6,713,446 ( the 446 patent, entitled Formulation of Boronic Acid Compounds (Exhibit A hereto, was duly and legally issued on March 30, 2004. The 446 patent, which is owned by the United States of America as Represented by the Secretary of Health and Human Services, will expire on January 25, 2022. 18. United States Patent No. 6,958,319 ( the 319 patent, entitled Formulation of Boronic Acid Compounds (Exhibit B hereto, was duly and legally issued on October 25, 2005. The 319 patent, which is owned by the United States of America as Represented by the Secretary of Health and Human Services, will expire on January 25, 2022. 19. Millennium has had an exclusive license to the Patents-in-Suit since December 2, 2002, by virtue of an exclusive worldwide license agreement for the research, development, and manufacture of MLN341 (bortezomib for distribution, sale and use in oncology disease states. Pursuant to this license, Millennium has the right to bring suit in its own name, at its own expense, and on its own behalf for infringement of the Patents-in-Suit. 20. VELCADE for Injection is a proteasome inhibitor, for intravenous or subcutaneous administration, approved by the FDA for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma and patients with mantle cell lymphoma. 21. Millennium sells VELCADE for Injection in the United States pursuant to New Drug Application No. 21-602 which was approved by the FDA in 2003 and pursuant to several - 4 -

Case 1:17-cv-00422-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/13/17 Page 5 of 13 PageID #: 5 subsequent supplemental new drug applications for additional indications and a new route of administration which have also been approved by the FDA. 22. VELCADE for Injection, and its preparation and use, are covered by one or more claims of the Patents-in-Suit, which have been listed in connection with VELCADE for Injection in the FDA s publication, Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations, referred to as the Orange Book. 23. For example, VELCADE for Injection is the lyophilized mannitol ester of bortezomib, which has the chemical name D-mannitol N-(2-pyrazinecarbonyl-L-phenylalanine- L-leucine boronate, and which is covered by at least claim 20 of the 446 patent. See e.g., 446 patent, claim 20 ( The lyophilized compound D-mannitol N-(2-pyrazinecarbonyl-Lphenylalanine-L-leucine boronate. ; see also 446 patent, claims 1-6, 8-16, 18-19, 21-27, 29-38, 47, 49, 58-59, 61-64, 66-67, and 69. Further, the preparation and/or use of VELCADE for Injection are covered by at least claims 39-40, 42-44, 46, 50-51, 53-55, 57, 65, and 68 of the 446 patent. 24. In addition, VELCADE for Injection is covered by at least claim 26 of the 319 patent. See, e.g., 319 patent, claim 26 ( The lyophilized compound of claim 20, wherein said compound is a sugar ester of N-(2-pyrazinecarbonyl-L-phenylalanine-L-leucine boronic acid. ; see also 319 patent, claims 1-3, 5-9, 11-17, 19-22, 24-25, 27-28, 46, 55, 57, 71, 73, and 75. Further, the preparation, and/or use of VELCADE for Injection are covered by at least claims 29-31, 33-36, 38-45, 47-48, 50-52, 54, 59-60, 62-64, 66-68, 70, 72, 74, and 76-78 of the 319 patent. - 5 -

Case 1:17-cv-00422-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/13/17 Page 6 of 13 PageID #: 6 25. By letter dated February 28, 2017 (the Notice Letter, Amneal notified Millennium that it had submitted to the FDA ANDA No. 210049 for bortezomib for injection, 3.5 mg/vial, a generic version of VELCADE for Injection ( the Amneal ANDA Product. 26. In the Notice Letter, Amneal stated that its ANDA included Paragraph IV certifications with respect to the Patents-in-Suit and alleged that the Patents-in-Suit are invalid, unenforceable, or will not be infringed by the commercial manufacture, use, offer for sale, or sale of the Amneal ANDA Product. 27. In the Notice Letter, however, Amneal does not contest infringement of claims 1-6, 8-16, 18-27, 29-40, 42-44, 46-47, 49-51, 53-55, 57-59, and 61-69 of the 446 patent. These claims are variously directed to mannitol esters of a genus of chemical compounds that encompasses bortezomib, the mannitol ester of bortezomib, the lyophilized mannitol ester of bortezomib, a composition comprising mannitol esters of a genus of chemical compounds that encompasses bortezomib and a pharmaceutically-acceptable carrier, a composition comprising the lyophilized mannitol ester of bortezomib and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, a lyophilized cake comprising the lyophilized mannitol ester of bortezomib, a composition comprising the mannitol ester of bortezomib and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, as well as a method of preparing the lyophilized mannitol ester of bortezomib, a lyophilized cake comprising the lyophilized mannitol ester of bortezomib prepared in accordance with that method, and a composition comprising a pharmaceutically-acceptable carrier and the lyophilized mannitol ester of bortezomib prepared according to that method. 28. In addition, in the Notice Letter Amneal does not contest infringement of claims 1-3, 5-9, 11-17, 19-22, 24-31, 33-36, 38-48, 50-52, 54-55, 57, 59-60, 62-64, 66-68, and 70-78 of the 319 patent. These claims variously encompass mannitol esters of a genus of chemical - 6 -

Case 1:17-cv-00422-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/13/17 Page 7 of 13 PageID #: 7 compounds that encompasses bortezomib, the mannitol ester of bortezomib, the lyophilized mannitol ester of bortezomib, a composition comprising mannitol esters of a genus of chemical compounds that encompasses bortezomib and a pharmaceutically-acceptable carrier, a composition comprising the lyophilized mannitol ester of bortezomib and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, a lyophilized cake comprising the lyophilized mannitol ester of bortezomib, a composition comprising the mannitol ester of bortezomib and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, as well as a method of preparing the lyophilized mannitol ester of bortezomib, a lyophilized cake comprising the lyophilized mannitol ester of bortezomib prepared in accordance with that method, and a composition comprising a pharmaceutically-acceptable carrier and the lyophilized mannitol ester of bortezomib prepared according to that method. 29. Amneal has committed an act of infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271(e(2(A by filing ANDA No. 210049 under 21 U.S.C. 355(j(2, seeking approval to engage in the commercial manufacture, use and/or sale of the Amneal ANDA Product before the expiration of the terms of the Patents-in-Suit. 30. The sale, offer for sale, importation, preparation, and/or use of the proposed Amneal ANDA Product for which Amneal seeks approval in its ANDA will directly and/or indirectly infringe one or more claims of the Patents-in-Suit. 31. Millennium is entitled under 35 U.S.C. 271(e(4 to full relief from Amneal s acts of infringement, including an Order by this Court ensuring that the effective date of any approval of ANDA No. 210049 relating to the proposed Amneal ANDA Product shall not be earlier than the expiration of the Patents-in-Suit. 32. This action was commenced before the expiration of forty-five days from the date of Millennium s receipt of the Notice Letter. - 7 -

Case 1:17-cv-00422-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/13/17 Page 8 of 13 PageID #: 8 33. On August 20, 2015, the Court entered an order in Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Sandoz Inc., C.A. No. 12-1011-GMS (consolidated, in which the Court held certain claims of the 446 patent invalid due to obviousness. 34. On September 21, 2015, Millennium filed a notice of appeal from the Court s August 20, 2015 order and August 24, 2015 judgment of invalidity. 35. Claims 1-6, 8-16, 18-19, 21-27, 29-30, 32-40, 42-44, 46-47, 50-51, 54-55, 57-59, and 61-69 of the 446 patent are not among the claims of the 446 patent that the Court held invalid. COUNT I INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,713,446 36. Millennium incorporates each of the preceding paragraphs 1-35 as if fully set forth herein. 37. Amneal s submission of ANDA No. 210049 for the purpose of obtaining approval to engage in the commercial manufacture, use, offer for sale, and/or sale of the Amneal ANDA Product before the expiration of the 446 patent is an act of infringement of the 446 patent under 35 U.S.C. 271(e(2(A. 38. Upon information and belief, Amneal intends to engage in the manufacture, use, offer for sale, sale, and/or importation of the Amneal ANDA Product with its proposed labeling immediately and imminently upon approval of ANDA No. 210049. 39. The commercial manufacture, use, offer for sale, sale and/or importation of the Amneal ANDA Product would directly infringe one or more claims of the 446 patent. For example, upon information and belief, the Amneal ANDA Product and/or the intended use thereof are covered by at least claims 1-6, 8-16, 18-27, 29-40, 42-44, 46-47, 49-51, 53-55, 57-59, and 61-69 of the 446 patent (the 446 Asserted Claims. - 8 -

Case 1:17-cv-00422-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/13/17 Page 9 of 13 PageID #: 9 40. Amneal had knowledge of the 446 patent when it submitted its ANDA to the FDA. Further, upon information and belief, Amneal knows (or is willfully blind to the fact that the commercial manufacture, use, offer to sell, sale, or importation of the Amneal ANDA Product will constitute infringement of at least the 446 Asserted Claims. Upon information and belief, this knowledge is reflected through, among other things, the 446 patent s listing in the Orange Book in relation to VELCADE for Injection, prior litigation related to the 446 patent, including Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Sandoz Inc., C.A. No. 12-1011-GMS (consolidated, and Amneal s Notice Letter, which does not contest infringement of claims 1-6, 8-16, 18-27, 29-40, 42-44, 46-47, 49-51, 53-55, 57-59, and 61-69 of the 446 patent. 41. Upon information and belief, use of the Amneal ANDA Product in accordance with and as directed by Amneal s proposed labeling for that product would infringe one or more claims of the 446 patent. For example, upon information and belief, Amneal s proposed labeling will instruct that the Amneal ANDA Product is the lyophilized mannitol ester of bortezomib and will instruct that the Amneal ANDA Product be prepared for administration in a manner covered by at least claims 39-40, 42-44, 46, 50-51, 53-55, 57, 65, and 68 of the 446 patent. Accordingly, Amneal will actively induce infringement under 35 U.S.C. 271(b of at least claims 39-40, 42-44, 46, 50-51, 53-55, 57, 65, and 68 of the 446 patent upon approval of ANDA No. 210049. 42. The Amneal ANDA Product is specially made to infringe at least claims 39-40, 42-44, 46, 50-51, 53-55, 57, 63, 65, and 68 of the 446 Patent, and has no substantial noninfringing use. Accordingly, the commercial manufacture, use, offer to sell, sale, or importation of the Amneal ANDA Product will contributorily infringe at least claims 39-40, 42-44, 46, 50-51, 53-55, 57, 63, 65, and 68 of the 446 Patent under 35 U.S.C. 271(c. - 9 -

Case 1:17-cv-00422-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/13/17 Page 10 of 13 PageID #: 10 43. Upon information and belief, Amneal acted without a reasonable basis for believing that it would not be liable for directly and indirectly infringing the 446 patent. 44. Unless Amneal is enjoined from directly and indirectly infringing the 446 patent, Millennium will suffer irreparable injury. Millennium has no adequate remedy at law. INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,958,319 45. Millennium incorporates each of the preceding paragraphs 1-44 as if fully set forth herein. 46. Amneal s submission of ANDA No. 210049 for the purpose of obtaining approval to engage in the commercial manufacture, use, offer for sale, and/or sale of the Amneal ANDA Product before the expiration of the 319 Patent is an act of infringement of the 319 Patent under 35 U.S.C. 271(e(2(A. 47. Upon information and belief, Amneal intends to engage in the manufacture, use, offer for sale, sale, and/or importation of the Amneal ANDA Product with its proposed labeling immediately and imminently upon approval of ANDA No. 210049. 48. The commercial manufacture, use, offer for sale, sale and/or importation of the Amneal ANDA Product would directly infringe one or more claims of the 319 Patent. For example, upon information and belief, the Amneal ANDA Product and/or the intended use thereof are covered by at least claims 1-3, 5-9, 11-17, 19-22, 24-31, 33-36, 38-48, 50-52, 54-55, 57, 59-60, 62-64, 66-68, and 70-78 of the 319 Patent (the 319 Asserted Claims. 49. Amneal had knowledge of the 319 Patent when it submitted its ANDA to the FDA. Further, upon information and belief, Amneal knows (or is willfully blind to the fact that the commercial manufacture, use, offer to sell, sale, or importation of the Amneal ANDA Product will constitute infringement of at least the 319 Asserted Claims. Upon information and belief, this knowledge is reflected through, among other things, the 319 Patent s listing in the - 10 -

Case 1:17-cv-00422-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/13/17 Page 11 of 13 PageID #: 11 Orange Book in relation to VELCADE for Injection, prior litigation related to the 319 Patent, including Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Sandoz Inc., C.A. No. 12-1011-GMS (consolidated, and Amneal s Notice Letter, which does not contest infringement of claims 1-3, 5-9, 11-17, 19-22, 24-31, 33-36, 38-48, 50-52, 54-55, 57, 59-60, 62-64, 66-68, and 70-78 of the 319 Patent. 50. Upon information and belief, use of the Amneal ANDA Product in accordance with and as directed by Amneal s proposed labeling for that product would infringe one or more claims of the 319 Patent. For example, upon information and belief, Amneal s proposed labeling will instruct that the Amneal ANDA Product is the lyophilized mannitol ester of bortezomib and will instruct that the Amneal ANDA Product be prepared for administration in a manner covered by at least claims 47-48, 50-52, 54, 59-60, 62-64, 66-67, 70, 72, 74, and 77 of the 319 Patent. Accordingly, Amneal will actively induce infringement under 35 U.S.C. 271(b of at least claims 47-48, 50-52, 54, 59-60, 62-64, 66-67, 70, 72, 74, and 77 of the 319 Patent upon approval of ANDA No. 210049. 51. The Amneal ANDA Product is specially made to infringe at least claims 47-48, 50-52, 54, 59-60, 62-64, 66-67, 70, 72, 74, and 77 of the 319 Patent, and has no substantial noninfringing use. Accordingly, the commercial manufacture, use, offer to sell, sale, or importation of the Amneal ANDA Product will contributorily infringe at least claims 47-48, 50-52, 54, 59-60, 62-64, 66-67, 70, 72, 74, and 77 of the 319 Patent under 35 U.S.C. 271(c. 52. Upon information and belief, Amneal acted without a reasonable basis for believing that it would not be liable for directly and indirectly infringing the 319 Patent. 53. Unless Amneal is enjoined from directly and indirectly infringing the 319 Patent, Millennium will suffer irreparable injury. Millennium has no adequate remedy at law. - 11 -

Case 1:17-cv-00422-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/13/17 Page 12 of 13 PageID #: 12 PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Millennium prays that this Court grant the following relief: (a A judgment that Amneal s submission of ANDA No. 210049 was an act of infringement of the Patents-in-Suit, and that Amneal s manufacture, use, offer to sell, sale, or importation of the Amneal ANDA Product prior to the expiration of the Patents-in-Suit, will infringe and/or actively induce and/or contribute to infringement of the Patents-in-Suit; (b An Order pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271(e(4(A providing that the effective date of any FDA approval of Amneal s ANDA No. 210049, or any product or compound that infringes the Patents-in-Suit, shall not be earlier than the expiration of the Patents-in-Suit; (c An Order permanently enjoining Amneal, and its affiliates and subsidiaries, and each of their officers, agents, servants and employees, from making, have made, using, offering to sell, selling, marketing, distributing, or importing the Amneal ANDA Product, or any product or compound that infringes the Patents-in-Suit, or inducing or contributing to the infringement of the Patents-in-Suit until after the expiration of the Patents-in-Suit; (d A declaration that this is an exceptional case and an award of attorneys fees to Millennium pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285 and 271(e(4, together with its reasonable costs; and (e Such further and other relief as this Court deems proper and just. - 12 -

Case 1:17-cv-00422-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/13/17 Page 13 of 13 PageID #: 13 MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP /s/ Maryellen Noreika Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014 Maryellen Noreika (#3208 1201 North Market Street P.O. Box 1347 Wilmington, DE 19899 (302 658-9200 jblumenfeld@mnat.com mnoreika@mnat.com OF COUNSEL: Attorneys for Plaintiff Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. William F. Lee Lisa J. Pirozzolo Emily R. Whelan Jason H. Liss WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 60 State Street Boston, MA 02109 (617 526-6000 Robert M. Galvin WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 950 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304 (650 858-6000 April 13, 2017-13 -