HOW TO AVOID OR REDUCE ATTORNEY S FEES AWARDS UNDER CALIFORNIA CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

Similar documents
J. Leah Castella

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE. Plaintiff, Respondent, and Cross-Appellant,

The Wheels of Justice

Dupreme ourt the i niteb Dtate

The Class Actions Act

Returning Forfeited Assets to Crime Victims: An Overview ofremission and Restoration

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) )

Florida. Florida State False Claims Laws

Opposing Post-Judgment Fee. Discrimination Cases*

BELIZE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES PROTECTION ACT CHAPTER 31 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000

IT IS PROPER TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY TO ASCERTAIN THE NATURE OF THE FINANCIAL RELATIONSHIPS AND REFERRALS BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS ATTORNEY AND THEIR EXPERTS:

PART 11: RECOVERABLE COSTS OF LITIGATION, ASSESSMENT OF COSTS AND SANCTIONS

Case 2:17-cv MMB Document 34-2 Filed 04/26/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Uniform Class Proceedings Act

Filing an Answer to the Complaint or Moving to Dismiss under Rule 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

monetary or legal obligations or enter into new agreements with any person for any purpose or modify any existing agreements; and

Legal Memo on Law on Compensation Translated from Dari

All applications must meet the tests for probable cause and reasonableness set out in these guidelines.

New Mexico Medicaid False Claims Act

UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION - DETROIT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

United States District Court

Civil No. C [Sacramento County Superior Court Case No ] IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

FIJI ISLANDS HIGH COURT ACT (CHAPTER 13) HIGH COURT (AMENDMENT) RULES 1998

Holzer & Holzer, LLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW

The Hawaii False Claims Act

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE

("FLSA"). This Court has supplemental jurisdiction over the New York state law claims, as they. (212) (212) (fax)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Defendants.

Nai Hua Li v Super 8 Worldwide,Inc NY Slip Op 32812(U) November 20, 2012 Supreme Court, Richmond County Docket Number: /2012 Judge:

Public Law Update. Tan` Court Clarifies Meaning of a Mitigation Fee Act Exaction By J. Leah Castella, Esq. Curses, foiled again!

TYPES OF MONETARY DAMAGES

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

Case 0:10-cv KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/10/2010 Page 1 of 7

of Citizens for Beach Rights v. City of San Diego, Case No. D069638, Filed Filed March March 28, 28, Haller: and Rules of Court, rule (c).

Case: 4:14-md RWS Doc. #: 164 Filed: 12/18/15 Page: 1 of 8 PageID #: 1284

Polluter Pays Doctrine Underscored: Section 99(2) of the EPA Applied: Some Thoughts on Midwest Properties Ltd. v. Thordarson, 2015 ONCA 819

Shareholder Class Action Lawsuits under the New Companies Act, 2013: Lessons Learned from the U.S. Experience

CHAPTER 36. MEDICAID FRAUD PREVENTION SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL PROVISIONS

Incorporated in England & Wales (Company No ) Registered Office: Third Floor, 55 Gower Street, London WC1E 6HQ

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF DERIVATIVE LITIGATION

Cost and Fee Allocation in Civil Procedure

Montana. Billing Montana's Medicaid program for services not rendered

April 30, The Sections of Antitrust Law and International Law (the Sections ) of the American

POLICY STATEMENT. Topic: False Claims Act Date Effective: 10/13/08. X Revised New Section: Corporate Compliance Number: 10.05

Instructions on filing a claim:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Texas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

CAYMAN ISLANDS. Supplement No. 28 published with Extraordinary Gazette No. 45 of 31st May, PROCEEDS OF CRIME LAW.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE. 2. This Court has original federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1331

CONSTITUTION OF THE THUNDERBIRDS MODEL AIRCRAFT CLUB INCORPORATED

HOW TO MINIMISE BILLING COMPLAINTS. Diane Howell, Law Complaints Officer Legal Practitioners Complaints Committee

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/27/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

S10A1212. ROBINSON et al. v. BAKER et al. This is an appeal from a final order of the Superior Court of Irwin County

Remedies: Injunction and Damages. 1. General

Responding to Government Investigations

CHAPTER 77 THE GOVERNMENT PROCEEDINGS ACT. Arrangement of Sections.

Uniform Rules of Procedure in the Arbitration Courts at the Chambers of Commerce of the CMEA Countries Dated February 28, 1974

(132nd General Assembly) (Substitute House Bill Number 271) AN ACT

Prepared By: Commerce and Consumer Services Committee REVISED:

Joy L. Bowens v. Mazuma Credit Union

Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. CASE NO. 5D

Nathan Sewell v. Wescom Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO

Case: 1:13-cv Document #: 382 Filed: 03/08/18 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:7778

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

Model Non-Collusion Clauses and Non-Collusive Tendering Certificate

No. 49,278-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * MICHAEL DAVID COX Plaintiff-Appellee. Versus

Danell Behrens v. Landmark Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

THE DISTRICT COURT OF BENTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS SILOAM SPRINGS DIVISION WHAT ROLE DO ATTORNEYS PLAY IN THE SMALL CLAIMS COURT PROCEDURE?

Regulation of Nomination, Remuneration and Governance Committee

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D10-869

Prime Ministerial Decree No of 2005 Issuing the executive regulations of Protection of Competition and

CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CDC AGENDA ITEM TRANSMITTAL REPORT

COURT ORDER INTEREST ACT

RHODESIAN RIDGEBACK CLUB of SOUTH AUSTRALIA INCORPORATED Incorporated on 13 th January 1989 Registered Number 12586P CONSTITUTION

IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS EASTERN DISTRICT APPEAL NO. ED JOHN CHASNOFF, Plaintiff/Respondent

Wilmington Update. Delaware Supreme Court and the Court of Chancery Offer Obligation Guidance for Financially Troubled Entities

HB SESSION OF THE TEXAS LEGISLATURE

JOINT ETHICS ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM (JEEP) MANUAL OF PROCEDURES. December 2006

TANNER v. ARMCO STEEL CORP. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, GALVESTON DIVISION. 340 F. Supp. 532.

CIRCUIT COURT OF MULTNOMAH COUNTY, OREGON

Daniel J. Kaiser, for appellant. Jean-Claude Mazzola, for respondents. Plaintiff Kyle Connaughton appeals, as limited by his

THIS IS AN IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE THE MATTERS DISCUSSED HEREIN MAY AFFECT SUBSTANTIAL LEGAL RIGHTS THAT YOU MAY HAVE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

SUMMARY OF YOUR OPTIONS AND THE LEGAL EFFECT OF EACH OPTION APPROVE THE

Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery; Duty of Disclosure [ Proposed Amendment ]

Defend Trade Secrets Act: What You Need to Know. May 31, 2016

Victoria House Bloomsbury Place 26 November 2014 London WC1A 2EB. Before: PETER FREEMAN CBE QC (HON) (Chairman) BRIAN LANDERS STEPHEN WILKS

Police or Regulatory Power Exception to Automatic Stay. Linda Attreed, J.D. Candidate 2013

In Randolph v. ING Life Insurance and Annuity Company, several. Defendant Prevails in Privacy Case Where Data Theft Results in No Injury To Plaintiffs

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION

APPENDIX F. The Role of Proportionality in Reducing the Cost of Civil Litigation

PRIVATE MANAGED FOREST LAND COUNCIL BYLAW #3 / 04. Contents

Transcription:

League of California Cities City Attorneys Department July 18, 2013 Webinar HOW TO AVOID OR REDUCE ATTORNEY S FEES AWARDS UNDER CALIFORNIA CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1021.5. J. Leah Castella lcastella@bwslaw.com Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP 1901 Harrison Street, Suite 900 Oakland, California 94612 510.273.8780 Insult to Injury California Code of Civil Procedure 1021.5 Upon motion, a court may award attorneys' fees to a successful party against one or more opposing parties in any action which has resulted in the enforcement of an important right affecting the public interest if: (a) a significant benefit, whether pecuniary or nonpecuniary, has been conferred on the general public or a large class of persons, (b) the necessity and financial burden of private enforcement, or of enforcement by one public entity against another public entity, are such as to make the award appropriate, and (c) such fees should not in the interest of justice be paid out of the recovery, if any. 2 1

Important Requirements of the Statute Successful Party 3 Catalyst Plaintiffs The lawsuit was a catalyst motivating the defendants to provide the primary relief sought. 4 2

Catalyst Plaintiffs The lawsuit had merit and achieved its catalytic effect by threat of victory, not by dint of nuisance and threat of expense. 5 Catalyst Plaintiffs The plaintiffs reasonably attempted to settle the litigation prior to filing the lawsuit. 6 3

Primary Litigation Objective Look to pleadings, trial briefs, opening statements, and similar sources to determine litigation objective. 7 Primary Litigation Objective Where a litigant in a writ proceeding obtains only partial relief, the relevant inquiry for the court is whether the issues on which plaintiffs prevailed were "substantial" when compared to the requests for relief which were denied. 8 4

Necessity and Financial Burden of Private Enforcement To be entitled to fees under Section 1021.5, the cost of the litigation must place a burden on the litigant that is out of proportion to the litigant s personal interest in the lawsuit. 9 Necessity and Financial Burden of Private Enforcement Statutory purpose is to provide an incentive for plaintiffs to bring public interest suits when their personal stake in the outcome is insufficient to warrant incurring the costs of litigation. 10 5

Necessity and Financial Burden of Private Enforcement To be entitled to fees, the litigant bears the burden of showing that their personal stake was not sufficient by itself to justify the lawsuit. 11 Tip 1 Cast Doubt on the Litigant as a Catalyst a plaintiff that steps into a pre-existing regulatory investigation cannot claim fees as a catalyst a plaintiff who accelerates a pre-existing investigation is not a catalyst 12 6

Tip 2 Engage the Litigant in Settlement Discussions Section 1021.5 does not permit an award of attorney s fees in catalyst cases when reasonable efforts short of litigation would have vindicated the rights that a litigant purports to advance. 13 Tip 3 Show that the Litigant Didn t Get What He/She Was After Courts will conduct an analysis of the surrounding circumstances of the litigation and a pragmatic assessment of the gains achieved by a particular action by comparing the results of the litigation to the parties' demands and their "litigation objectives as disclosed by the pleadings, trial briefs, opening statements, and similar sources." Need to take steps to get evidence of litigation objectives. Often, asking litigant what he/she wants particular in conjunction with a settlement overture is a good way to accomplish this objective. 14 7

Tip 4 Show that the Litigant Was Really Looking After His/Her Own Interest Court will engage in a "a realistic and practical comparison of the litigant's personal interest with the cost of suit." Burden is on the plaintiff to establish that the litigation costs transcended its personal interest. Need to get evidence of the litigant s personal stake in the outcome. 15 Make a 998 Offer Tip 5 Code of Civil Procedure 998 ( Section 998 ) provides that a defendant may terminate a prevailing party s ability to recover statutory attorneys fees if it tenders an offer that is not accepted and the prevailing party fails to achieve a more favorable result in the litigation. The offer can include non-monetary terms so long as they are sufficiently specific. The offer can include an agreement to pay fees as determined by a court. 16 8

Tip 6 Scrutinize the Other Side s Fees A trial court can reduce a fee request on the basis that the fees incurred were wasteful. A trial court can reduce a fee request on the basis that the fees incurred were duplicative or unnecessary. 17 Challenge the Rate Tip 7 At least one court has held that, as a matter of public policy, whether or not the rate charged to a public entity is reasonable must be judged by an objective standard from the point of view of the public entity. This creates the possibility of significantly reducing the rate used to calculate the fees due. 18 9

Conclusion Be aware of the risk. Know the requirements of the statute. Create a record. Scrutinize the fee request. 19 10