Primacy, Recency, and the Opening Statement

Similar documents
WRITING FOR TRIALS 1

Heather Zuber-Harshman Duncan School of Law/ Thomas Jefferson School of Law. The 2011 Applied Legal Storytelling Conference Saturday, July 9, 2011

Lessons Learned for Experts and Advocates

Crafting a Closing Argument

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features: Michael A. Brusca, Shareholder, Stark & Stark, Lawrenceville, N.J.

Preparing the Physician for Deposition and Trial

By Susan J. Macpherson Capture jurors attention by telling the human story behind the business jargon.

Dynamic Opening Statements How to Establish Credibility and Persuade From the Beginning

NO. 07-CI JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT DIVISION TEN (10) JUDGE IRV MAZE TONIA FREEMAN PLAINTIFF. BECKER LAW OFFICE, PLC, et al.

DIRECT EXAMINATION. Robert E. Harrington Robinson, Bradshaw & Hinson, P.A.

Adding a Little Bit of Hollywood to Your Trial

INTRODUCTION OF EXHIBITS AT TRIAL THE BASICS

THE SECRET WEAPON: USING THE APPELLATE LAWYER AT TRIAL TO PRIME YOUR CASE FOR APPEAL

Trial Academy Voir Dire: The Rejection Process

The Civil Action Part 1 of a 4 part series

PART I: STUDYING JURORS

Function of the Jury Burden of Proof and Greater Weight of the Evidence Credibility of Witness Weight of the Evidence

BUSINESS TORTS / COMMERCIAL LITIGATION: EFFECTIVE TRIAL TECHNIQUES

GETTING THE APPELLATE LAWYER INVOLVED EARLY IN LITIGATION

JURY INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION-CRIMINAL

Top Ten Five New Issues in the Jury Charge

Alpena County. Version 1.0 JURY DUTY HANDBOOK

OUTLINE JURY SELECTION AND VOIR DIRE THE ROSSDALE GROUP CLE OCTOBER 23, 2013

The Art of Advocacy: Trial Persuasion in a Polarized World

10 Tips for Trial Attorneys

Mock Trial Practice Law Test

Effective Management of Civil Cases

MODEL MOTOR VEHICLE NEGLIGENCE CHARGE AND VERDICT SHEET. MOTOR VEHICLE VOLUME REPLACEMENT JUNE

Closing Argument Practice Tips

P R E T R I A L O R D E R

STRIKE FOR CAUSE. ROBERT R. SWAFFORD 1513 W. 6th St., Ste. B Austin, TX (512)

HANDBOOK FOR TRIAL JURORS SERVING IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS

Voir Dire Workshop. Making and Preserving For- Cause Challenges in Voir Dire

GENERAL CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS. Members of the jury, it is now time for me to tell you the law that applies to

MODEL JURY SELECTION QUESTIONS

P R E T R I A L O R D E R

4. CROSS EXAMINATION 159

UPDATE MEMORANDUM 2016 ISBA High School Mock Trial Invitational

13 ADVANCED TRIAL TIPS. Gary K. Burger BURGER LAW BurgerLaw.com

Children s Commission

Young Lawyers Panel: The Do s and Don ts of Trial Practice, Trying Your First Case

SS.7.C.3.3 and SS.7.C.3.8 Judicial Branch: Article III

Testifying 201. We will cover today 12/19/2012. CASA Advocacy Skills Seminar December 19, 2012 Charles G. Childress, Attorney at Law

NIJC Pro Bono Seminar

EFFECTIVE VOIR DIRE, OPENING, AND CLOSING ARGUMENT FROM A PROPERTY OWNER S AND CONDEMNOR S PERSPECTIVE

HOW A CRIMINAL CASE PROCEEDS IN FLORIDA

Rules of Evidence (Abridged)

MISCONDUCT. Committee Opinion May 11, 1993

Four Lethal, and Preventable, Defense Mistakes in Civil Litigation

P R E T R I A L O R D E R

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Using Demonstrative Evidence In Employment Trials

2:16-cv EIL # 106 Page 1 of 20

The Expedited Seminar on Mandatory Expedited Jury Trials

Jury Selection of a Construction Case in the Era of Social Media: What Can I Do and When Can I Do It?

TRAVERSE JUROR HANDBOOK

Using Storytelling Techniques to Craft a Persuasive Legal Story

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D

Moderated by: Eugene Felton, Jr., Esq.

Deposition Do s and Don ts 1 hour

JUDGE DENISE POSSE LINDBERG STOCK CIVIL JURY INSTRUCTIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Essentials of Demonstrative Evidence

ON SOCIAL MEDIA SEARCHES OF JURORS BEFORE, DURING, AND AFTER TRIAL Featuring a One Act Mock Hearing before The Honorable Marc Treadwell

The jury panel is selected by lot from all the names of registered voters or from persons having a valid driver s license.

By Aaron B. Maduff Maduff, Medina, & Maduff One East Wacker Dr., 21 st Floor Chicago, Illinois

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. 2 Opinion Number: 3 Filing Date: April 26, NO. 34,511

Confronting the Immigration Bias in Jury Selection

FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 2018

NO.: and VS.

JUDGES IN THE CLASSROOM LESSON PLANS

KEY ELEMENTS of a WINNING TRIAL NOTEBOOK

Mr. and Mrs. Bishop were not involved at all in the investigation except to provide testimony regarding the accident.

PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY RESPONDING TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE: THE RESPONDENT S PERSPECTIVE

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Chapter 5: Drafting Legal Memoranda

THE POWER OF TRIAL OBJECTIONS MOTIONS IN LIMINE. Kurt Hoffman Dana Kuehn

JURY SELECTION AFTER CORTEZ

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION

APPENDIX TWO-SAMPLE TORTS EXAM PART TWO: FIFTY MINUTES. This question has two subparts. Your answers to the two subparts may be of unequal length.

THE VOIR DIRE: AN APPROACH TO RUNNING ONE IN THE LOCAL COURT. Paul Townsend and Lester Fernandez October Introduction

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES OF JUDGE LOUIS L. STANTON

Petitioner, Respondent.

Mediation: Practical Tips From a Mediator

Introduction How Jurors are Selected Qualifications Exemptions. Your Role As A Juror Sequence of a Trial Petit and Grand Juries

Prosecutor Trial Preparation: Preparing the Victim of Human Trafficking to Testify

Table of Contents See also Summary of Contents starting on page xi.

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT JENNIFER MAYFIELD AND BENDAL MAYFIELD **********

JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 1. Members of the jury, the instructions I gave at the. instructions I gave you earlier, as well as those I give

A JUDGE S PERSPECTIVE ON EVIDENCE. (Basic Tools of Your New Trade) W. David Lee. Senior Resident Superior Court Judge.

Steps in the Process

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D

HOT TOPIC ISSUE: SPOILATION. General Liability Track, Session 3 Fifth Annual General Liability & Workers Compensation Seminar

PROSECUTING CHILD ABUSE. Dan Patterson Prosecuting Attorney Greene County Prosecutor s Office July 18, 2017

CAUSE NO CHARGE OF THE COURT

Lee Applebaum. Practice Groups. Education. Bar Admissions. Memberships

SECTION 14 JURY SELECTION

Trial Motions. Motions in Limine. Civil Perspective

Non-Scientific Expert Testimony in Child Abuse Trials

Transcription:

Primacy, Recency, and the Opening Statement Lee Ayres Stacey Smith Melerine Ayres Shelton Williams Benson & Paine LLC 333 Texas St Ste 1400 Shreveport, LA 71101 (318) 227-3304 leeayres@arklatexlaw.com

Leland (Lee) H. Ayres is a founding partner with Ayres Shelton Williams Benson & Paine LLC in Shreveport, Louisiana. A trial lawyer, his civil litigation experience includes business and commercial disputes, oil and gas litigation, property disputes, natural resources litigation, products liability claims, professional malpractice defense, trucking defense, personal injury claims, fraud claims, insurance coverage, and insurance bad faith defense. Stacey Smith Melerine practices as a litigation and trial attorney for Ayres Shelton Williams Benson & Paine LLC, handling complex litigation, trial and appellate matters. Stacey has considerable experience handling construction contracts and disputes.

Primacy, Recency, and the Opening Statement Table of Contents I. Using Primacy to Persuade...5 II. Use Themes...6 III. Chunking...6 IV. Sensory Variation...6 V. Combatting the Plaintiff s Primacy Advantage...6 VI. Conclusion...6 Endnote...6 Primacy, Recency, and the Opening Statement Ayres and Melerine 3

Primacy, Recency, and the Opening Statement In persuasive communication, the order of the information being presented has a significant impact on how a juror will receive that information. We tend to best remember information that we are presented with first, and then second best the information we are presented with last. This is the concept of primacy-recency. The primacy effect holds that information presented first will have a greater persuasive power than that produced later. Thus, the information that an audience is first presented with is the most meaningful. Likewise, in persuasive communication, information conveyed last is also highly persuasive. This is the recency effect. It is the information in the middle that is lost or muddled. The first items presented are within a person s working memory capacity and therefore stored in semantic memory. As information is received, it is sorted or lost in order to allow for the additional processing of the final bits of information. The primacy effect is why opening statements are one of the most critical moments in a trial. Look at the words below for 10 seconds and then cover them up and try to fill in the blanks in the order in which the words appeared. Apple 1. Wreath 2. Octopus 3. Ranch 4. Letter 5. Egg 6. Paper 7. Chair 8. Toy 9. Purple 10. Most likely, you remember the first several and last couple of words on the list. The words in the middle were likely the toughest to recall. In addition to affecting one s ability recall information, primacy also influences the persuasive power that information is given. Consider the following example: Karen is envious, stubborn, critical, impulsive, industrious, and intelligent. Karen is intelligent, industrious, impulsive, critical, stubborn, and envious. The sentences paint very different pictures of Karen despite containing the same information. The second description of Karen seems much more favorable than the first. This is an example of the primacy effect in action. The further down the adjective is in the list the more reduced is its primary effect 1. In order to be successful at trial you must use the primacy effect to your advantage. I. Using Primacy to Persuade Nearly every trial publication discusses how themes and storytelling make trial lawyers more persuasive. Consider the importance of theme and storytelling in the context of the opening statement. If your theme is well defined and your story is well crafted, it will give the jurors a framework by which to interpret all of the testimony and documentary evidence presented throughout the trial. If you use the first minutes of your opening to Primacy, Recency, and the Opening Statement Ayres and Melerine 5

layout your case and present your theme in a concise manner, it will be the thing that the jurors remember most. They can use this framework to give the middle parts of the trial testimony and documentary evidence context. Do not waste the first minutes of your opening reintroducing yourself to the jurors. Use voir dire as your initial opportunity to let the jury get comfortable with you. Also, do not explain to the jury the significance of their role, how much you like your client, or how an opening is supposed to work. Instead, take advantage of primacy and get the most important aspect of your case in front of the jury. If you are the defendant, distill down why the plaintiff cannot prevail and broadcast this to the jury. II. Use Themes Themes are important not only to develop a well-crafted narrative, they give you the opportunity to take advantage of both the primacy and recency effects. Present jurors with a concise theme throughout the trial in order to provide a persuasive context for the interpretation of the evidence. III. Chunking Chunking means that information is packaged together into meaningful groups. The chuck is a collection of very basic information that is repeated throughout the trial. Presenting the chunks of information early allows that information to be given a primacy effect. The information chunk should then be reiterated again at closing to take advantage of the recency effect. IV. Sensory Variation Jurors are more stimulated and pay more attention to new or novel stimulation. Since attention levels decline after information is initially presented, reengage the jurors by presenting evidence in a variety of formats, i.e. through graphics and other demonstrative evidence. Take advantage of their renewed attention by presenting critical information when a new graphic or demonstrative aid is introduced as this is the time they will be paying the most attention. V. Combatting the Plaintiff s Primacy Advantage The plaintiff will have the persuasive effect of primacy as he puts his case on first. During your opening anticipate key aspects of the plaintiff s case and offer the jury information by which to interpret it. Give the jury information early on that rebuts the plaintiff s case so that they can consider it as they are processing the plaintiff s case. VI. Conclusion Primacy means as defense counsel you must introduce the elements that kill the plaintiff s case immediately. Reiterate this point throughout the trial in various ways. Finally, present it again to the jury in closing. Endnote 1 In 1946, Solomon Asch asked some people about a person described as envious, stubborn, critical, impulsive, industrious and intelligent. He then asked other people about a person described as intelligent, industrious, impulsive, critical, stubborn and envious. The second group rated the person more highly than the first group. He also found that the second and third items on the list had reduced primacy effects. 6 Trial Tactics March 2017