Arrest Related Deaths in Nevada,

Similar documents
a. To effect an arrest or bring a subject under control;

Research Perspectives on the Use and Control of Police Force

Policy 5.11 ARREST PROCEDURES

1 California Criminal Law (4th), Crimes Against the Person

Introduction to the Constitution and Law Enforcement Exam

Criminal Justice Pacing Guide

AN ANALYSIS OF INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE CASE PROCESSING AND SENTENCING USING NIBRS DATA, ADJUDICATION DATA AND CORRECTIONS DATA

AMENDED ORDER GOVERNING THE MOVEMENT OF SELECTED INMATES INTO COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS PROGRAMS, OSCEOLA COUNTY

THE SERVICE OF SENTENCES AND CREDIT APPLICABLE TO OFFENDERS IN CUSTODY OF THE OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

H 7304 SUBSTITUTE A AS AMENDED ======== LC004027/SUB A ======== S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Ohio Investigative Unit Policy Number : INV PRISONER TRANSPORTATION

Quarterly Crime Statistics 4 th Quarter 2009 (1-October-2005 to 31-December-2009)

MONROE COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE

Jail Operations. Courthouse Security. Electronic Home Monitoring. Chief Joyce Klein Lieutenant Carolyn Parnow

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY

Pasadena Police Department Policy Manual

PENAL CODE TITLE 2. GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY CHAPTER 9. JUSTIFICATION EXCLUDING CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY

Probation and Parole Violators in State Prison, 1991

HOUSE AMENDMENT Bill No. HB 737

Sentencing Factors that Limit Judicial Discretion and Influence Plea Bargaining

STATE BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION PROCEDURE 12 POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL JULY 1, 2002 ARREST PROCEDURES

South Dakota Use of Force Laws: SDCL SDCL SDCL

UNIFORM FELONY BAIL SCHEDULE (PENAL CODE)

110 Explain Locard's principle of transference of trace materials at a crime scene. 403 Demonstrate the proper steps for patient assessment.

Profile of Intimate Partner Violence Cases in Large Urban Counties

Total Test Questions: 100 Levels: Units of Credit: 0.50

Sentencing Chronic Offenders

Juveniles Prosecuted in State Criminal Courts

22 Use of force in effecting arrest

Lexipol Illinois Policy Manual

CLEVELAND DIVISION OF POLICE GENERAL POLICE ORDER

COLLEGE OF CENTRAL FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE

Summer Science Camp Volunteer Counselor 2018 Application CHECKLIST

ORDER TYPE: NEED TO KNOW. PURPOSE The purpose of this policy is to define legal implications and procedures involved when a search is performed.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY COMPLAINT

Bail Reform in NJ HOW WILL IT AFFECT FOREIGN NATIONALS? NO ONE REALLY KNOWS HOW IT WILL AFFECT ANYONE YET!

Criminal History Analysis with Suspects Arrested at Portland State University

Body Worn Cameras on Police: Results from a National Survey of Public Attitudes

CRM 321 Mod 5 Lecture Notes

Comments by the University of Chicago Law School International Human Rights Clinic and Amnesty International USA on the proposed Federal Bureau of

Felony Defendants in Large Urban Counties, 2000

University of Pittsburgh Police Department. Rules & Regulations Manual. Transporting Prisoners. Title: 5-4 PLEAC

CERTIFICATION PROCEEDING

Subject OFFENSE CLEARANCE PROCEDURE. 21 September By Order of the Police Commissioner

CHAPTER 17 - ARREST POLICIES Alternatives to Arrest and Incarceration Criminal Process Immigration Violations

Report to Joint Judiciary Interim Committee

As Introduced. Regular Session H. B. No

Overcrowding Alternatives

Virginia Commonwealth University Police Department

INTRADEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE. The Honorable Board of Police Commissioners

MARIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE GENERAL ORDER. DATE Chapter 5- Operations GO /11/2014 PAGE 1 of 6. Immigration Status (Trust Act implementation)

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

2012 FELONY AND MISDEMEANOR BAIL SCHEDULE COUNTY OF IMPERIAL

Fact Sheet PENALTIES FOR CATEGORY B FELONIES UNDER NEVADA REVISED STATUTES (NRS) CATEGORY B FELONIES

Santa Monica Police Department Policy Manual

Identifying Chronic Offenders

Homicides in Oakland

Section 9 Causation 291

Nevada vs. U.S. Residents Attitudes Toward Surveillance Using Aerial Drones

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PRETRIAL SERVICES AGENCY

Clarification received:

2012 ANNUAL REPORT MARYLAND STATE POLICE FORENSIC SCIENCES DIVISION STATEWIDE DNA DATABASE

POLICE AND THE LAW USE OF FORCE

TEXARKANA, TEXAS POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDERS MANUAL. Amended Date November 1, 2015

Barbados. POLICE 2. Crimes recorded in criminal (police) statistics, by type of crime including attempts to commit crimes

Criminal Justice A Brief Introduction

Louisiana Data Analysis Part 1: Prison Trends. Justice Reinvestment Task Force August 11, 2016

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY COMPLAINT

Anaheim Police Department Anaheim PD Policy Manual

Superior Court of Washington For Pierce County

OFFENSES BY PUNISHMENT RANGE

CHIEF JUDGE ORDER SETTING FORTH BOND GUIDELINES

I. PURPOSE DEFINITIONS RESPECT FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS. Page 1 of 8

LAWS OF CORRECTION & CUSTODY ALABAMA PEACE OFFICERS STANDARDS & TRAINING COMMISSION

NEVADA COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE

Rules and Procedures. Rule 318 May 26, Rule PRISONERS

Earned credit for productive program participation.

Clear Country Contexts Based on data for January 2015-December 2017

TABLE B SELECTED CRIME OF VIOLENCE DEFINITIONS (and related lists of serious crimes) Prepared by Joe Cox, House Research March 15, 2002

CHAPTER House Bill No. 4059

ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE GENERAL ASPECTS OF CRIMINAL LAW. Name: Period: Row:

Quarterly Crime Statistics Q (01-January-2011 to 31-March-2011)

cook county state,s attorney DATA REPORT

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

BARRIER CRIMES FOR CHILD DAY PROGRAMS

Section 20 Mistake as to a Justification 631. Chapter 4. Offenses Against the Person Article 1. Homicide Section Murder in the First Degree

SIM GILL DISTRICT ATTORNEY

HONOLULU POLICE DEPARTMENT

To: Commission From: Uche Enwereuzor Re: No Early Release Act Date: September 10, 2012 MEMORANDUM

MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2018

REPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDGE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case. Superior Court of KITSAP County, Washington Cause No TIMOTHY ERIC CAFFREY

MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2017

North Orange County Community College District ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES Chapter 7 Human Resources AP 7600 Campus Safety Officer

Who Is In Our State Prisons?

Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, 2001

Immigration Violations

Information Memorandum 98-11*

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 165

Santa Cruz Police Department Santa Cruz Police Department Policy Manual

City of Virginia Beach Police Department

Transcription:

CENTER FOR THE ANALYSIS OF CRIME STATISTICS State Data Brief August 2012. CACS 2012-01-01CR Arrest Related Deaths in Nevada, 2009-11 By Timothy C. Hart, Ph.D., Kiera Flynn, and Colleen Savage For nearly a decade, the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), through the Deaths in Custody Reporting Program (DCRP) (PL 106-297), has collected inmate death records from each of the nation's 50 state prison systems, 50 state juvenile correctional authorities, and from local jails throughout the country. In 2003, BJS began collecting arrest-related deaths data from state and local law enforcement agencies as a part of the DCRP. Since the initial data collection year, law enforcement agencies in Nevada have not provided BJS with arrest-related deaths in custody information and are under no obligation to do so. In 2009, funding from the State Justice Statistics Program (award #2009-BJ-CX-K035), administered by BJS, was used by the Center for the Analysis of Crime Statistics (CACS) to develop and implement a statewide online data collection instrument. This survey tool offers local law enforcement agencies throughout Nevada a quick and easy way provide arrest-related deaths in custody information that can be included in the DCRP. In 2011, 51 of Nevada s 53 agencies (96%) participated in the project. This State Data Brief presents details related to the arrests-related deaths that occurred in Nevada from 2009 through 2011 and that were reported to CACS. The report includes information on when incidents occurred, demographic information of the suspects, the cause and manner of the reported deaths, the mental/physical condition of suspects at the time of the incidents, the locations of the deaths, and whether suspects were armed. Highlights From 2009 through 2011, Nevada s law enforcement agencies identified 33 individuals who died during the course of an arrest. Arrest-related deaths in Nevada have increased more than 62% over the past three years. The majority of arrest-related deaths involved individuals who were male (94%) and who were White, non-hispanic (42%). Thirty-nine percent of arrest-related deaths involved individuals who were between 36 and 50 years of age, which is greater than any other age group. Ninety-one percent of incidents were classified by the reporting agency as a homicide by law enforcement officer(s). The most serious offense committed by decedents was attempted murder (24%), followed by assault with a deadly weapon (21%). Eighty-two percent of incidents involved an armed individual and 46% of individuals who died during arrest resisted the arrest. This report includes information on incidents that met certain criteria for inclusion. Detailed information on those incidents that were included and excluded from this study are presented in the Methodology section. The opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of BJS.

Arrest-Related Deaths, 2009-11 From 2009 through 2011, state and local law enforcement agencies in Nevada identified 33 incidents that involved a suspect who died during the course of an arrest. The number of arrest-related deaths in Nevada has increased from 8 incidents in 2009 to 13 incidents in 2011, which is a 62% increase over three years. Detailed demographic information about decedents is summarized in Table 1. Table 1. Selected demographic characteristics of individuals who died during an arrest in Nevada, 2009-11. Demographic characteristics Gender Male 31 93.9 Female 2 6.1 Race White, non-hispanic 14 42.4 Black, non-hispanic 6 18.2 Multiple races 2 6.1 Other 1 3.0 Hispanic, any race 7 21.2 Missing 3 9.1 Age <18 1 3.0 18-24 4 12.1 25-35 11 33.3 36-50 13 39.4 +50 2 6.1 Missing 2 6.1 Note: Detail may not add to 100% due to Arrest-related deaths incidents that took place in Nevada between 2009 and 2011 and that were reported to CACS most often involved an individual who was male (94%), White, non-hispanic (42%), and who was between 36 and 50 years of age (39%). Manner and Medical Cause of Death Information on the manner and medical cause of death was provided to CACS by each law enforcement agency reporting an arrest-related death in Nevada. This information is presented in Table 2. Table 2. Manner of death and medical cause of death for individuals who died during an arrest in Nevada, 2009-11. Medical information Manner of death Homicide by law enforcement 30 90.9 Suicide 2 6.1 Accident 0 0.0 Other 0 0.0 Medical cause of death Cardiopulmonary arrest due to neck restraint 1 3.0 Cocaine/ethanol intoxication 2 6.1 Gunshot wound(s) 27 81.8 Hanging 1 3.0 Other 1 3.0 Note: Detail may not add to 100% due to Nearly all arrest-related deaths that occurred between 2009 and 2011 and that were reported to CACS were classified by law enforcement agencies as a homicide by law enforcement officer(s). Unlike the manner of death, the medical cause of death varied across incident. For example, while most suspects medical cause of death was determined to be the result of a gunshot(s) wound (82%), other suspects died from cocaine/ethanol intoxication (6%) or from hanging (3%) Offense(s) Committed by Deceased Information on the type of offense(s) committed by individuals who died during the course of an arrest was also requested from Nevada s agencies that participated in the CACS data collection project. The most serious offense committed by decedents is provided in Table 3. Analysis of these data indicates that nearly a quarter of all individuals who died during an arrest would have been charged with attempted murder. About 1- in-5 would have been charged with assault with a deadly weapon, and 18% would have been charged with a battery/domestic violence. One decedent would have been charged with arson, while another would have been charged with jaywalking. Arrest Related Deaths in Nevada, 2009-11 2

Table 3. Most serious offense committed by individuals who died during an arrest in Nevada, 2009-11. Offense charge information Condition and Location of Deceased Information concerning the deceased s mental and physical condition was requested from the agencies that provided CACS with arrest-related death data. Among the types of conditions reported, most individuals (46%) who died during an arrest in Nevada resisted arrest or being handcuffed and about 3-in-10 attempted to escape (Table 4). Onethird of decedents appeared intoxicated or exhibited mental health problems. Seventy percent of decedents died at the scene. Weapon Use Most serious offense Attempted murder 8 24.2 Arson 1 3.0 Assault w/a deadly weapon 7 21.2 Battery/Domestic violence 6 18.2 Home invasion 1 3.0 Jaywalking 1 3.0 Resisting arrest with a weapon 3 9.1 Robbery 1 3.0 Sale of a controlled substance 1 3.0 Sexual assault on a victim <14 1 3.0 Warrants 1 3.0 Not applicable/missing 2 6.1 Note: Detail may not add to 100% due to Eighty-two percent of situations involving an arrestrelated death in Nevada from 2009 through 2011 involved an individual armed with a weapon (Table 5). During those situations, the weapon was used to either threaten the officer or some other person 96% of the time. The deceased was reportedly unarmed in about one-eighth of all incidents. From 2009 through 2011, when an individual was killed by a Nevada law enforcement officer who used equipment or a weapon, a firearm was most often the type of weapon used. A conductive energy device (i.e., a stun gun) was used relatively less often. Other less than lethal device was used 20% of the time. Table 4. Mental/physical condition of the deceased and the location of the death among those who died during an arrest in Nevada, 2009-11. Condition and location Table 5. Weapons used by and against individuals who died during an arrest in Nevada, 2009-11. Weapon use by and against deceased Did the deceased-- Appear intoxicated 6 18.2 Exhibit mental health problems 5 15.2 Verbally threaten the officer(s) 4 12.1 Resist being cuffed/arrested 15 45.5 Attempt to escape 10 30.3 Become physically combative 3 9.1 None of the above 1 3.0 Where did the deceased die? At medical facility following clinical intervention 8 24.2 At crime scene 23 69.7 DOA at medical facility 1 3.0 Note: Agencies were permitted to select more than one mental/physical condition. Detail may not add to 100% due to During the arrest process, the deseased-- Carried or posessed a weapon 27 81.8 Used a weaopn to threaten the officer 17 63.0 Used a weapon to threaton other persons 9 33.3 Used a weapon to assault the officer 11 40.7 Used a weapon to assault other people 3 11.1 None of the above 2 7.4 Did not carry a wepon 4 12.1 Missng 2 6.1 Equipment/weapon used against deceased Used something anytime during the arrest process 25 75.8 Firearm 17 68.0 Handcuffs 6 24.0 Conducted energy device 4 16.0 Other "less than leathal" device 5 20.0 None of the above 8 24.2 Note: Agencies were permitted to select more than one type of equipment/weapon use. Detail may not add to 100% due to Arrest Related Deaths in Nevada, 2009-11 3

Methodology Data for this report was collected by the Center for the Analysis of Crime Statistics (CACS) the state of Nevada s Statistical Analysis Center (SAC) through an online reporting system funded by the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) and its State Justice Statistics (SJS) Program. Only incidents that met specific criteria were considered an arrest-related death in custody for the purpose of this data collection effort. An incident was included as an arrest-related death in custody if it took place in 2009 and involved the death of a person in the process of arrest and who was... Killed by any use of force by law enforcement officers; In the physical custody, or under the physical restraint of law enforcement officers, even if the person was not formally under arrest at the time; At crime/arrest scene or medical facility prior to booking; Killed in vehicular pursuit accidents during which law enforcement officers took direct action against the driver or vehicle (e.g., shooting at the suspect, forcing the vehicle off the road with an obstruction, spike strip, or the officer s own vehicle). While in transit to or from law enforcement facilities; or While confined in lockups or booking centers (facilities from which arrestees are usually transferred within 72 hours and not held beyond arraignment). An incident was excluded if it involved a person in the process of arrest that was... Confined in local jails (facilities which typically house inmates for periods beyond 72 hours after arraignment); Confined in State prisons, State juvenile correctional facilities, or private correctional facilities; Killed in the course of law enforcement activities against whom no charges were intended (e.g., innocent bystanders, hostages, law enforcement personnel). Who die before coming into contact with any law enforcement officers (e.g., subjects of arrest warrants who died before any arrest process began); or Killed in vehicular accidents during which law enforcement officers did NOT take any direct action against the driver or vehicle. All but two agencies in Nevada provided 2009 arrestrelated deaths in custody information. Selected findings summarized in this State Data Brief are based on these data and are presented as part of the CACS State Data Brief Project. State Data Brief Project As independent research projects, faculty and graduate students in UNLV's Department of Criminal Justice write research reports on major issues in criminal justice in Nevada. These "State Data Briefs" are statistical summaries of various criminal justice system practices in Nevada over time and highlight differences between Nevada and other states. These reports cover all aspects of the criminal justice system. The data briefs are short in length, provide several graphs and charts of statewide and national patterns, and are written in an easily readable, non-technical style. They are designed to provide members of the general public, local officials, community organizations, and media outlets a concise and objective statistical profile of current criminal justice practices in Nevada that may serve as a foundation for informed discussions of future crime control policies and practices. CACS State Data Briefs are modeled after similar reports produced by the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Arrest Related Deaths in Nevada, 2009-11 4

Contact Information Questions or comments about the information contained in this report, data used to generate this report, or about other resources available related to this topic should be address to: Terance D. Miethe, Ph.D. State Data Brief Project Coordinator University of Nevada Las Vegas 4505 Maryland Parkway - Box 5009 Las Vegas, NV 89154-5009 (B)702-895-0236 (F)702-895-0252 Department of Criminal Justice University of Nevada, Las Vegas 4505 S. Maryland Pkwy. Box 5009 Las Vegas, NV 89154-5009 POSTAGE REQUIRED Arrest Related Deaths in Nevada, 2009-11 5