IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN THE MATTER OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO NEVADA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 26, 30, AND 34.

Similar documents
FILED. Ati ORDER AMENDING NRCP 16.1(a)(2) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA ADKT 0472

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

FiLeD NOV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA. ADKT No. 468 IN THE MATTER OF ELECTRONIC FILING AND SERVICE AND ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES.

Depositions upon oral examination. A. When depositions may be taken. After commencement of the action, any party may take the testimony of any

ORDER. WHEREAS, the en bane court has held public hearings upon this Petition in Carson City and Las Vegas; and

DISCOVERY & E-DISCOVERY

Attorney s BriefCase Beyond the Basics Depositions in Family Law Matters

Update on 2015 Amendments to the FRCP

The 30.02(6), or 30(b)(6), Witness: Proper Notice, Preparation, and Deposition Techniques

DEPOSITIONS UPON ORAL EXAMINATION. Notice; Method of Taking; Production at Deposition.

RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART ONE RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS

THE COURTS. Title 207 JUDICIAL CONDUCT

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER

AMENDMENTS TO ORCP 39. promulgated by COUNCIL ON COURT PROCEDURES to 2016

PART III Discovery CHAPTER 8. Overview of the Discovery Process KEY POINTS THE NATURE OF DISCOVERY THE EXTENT OF ALLOWABLE DISCOVERY

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 H 1 HOUSE BILL 380. Short Title: Amend RCP/Electronically Stored Information.

SUBPOENA IN AN ADVERSARY PROCEEDING

Friday 30th January, 2004.

Table of Contents. See also Summary of Contents beginning on page vii.

RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULE 3:13. DEPOSITIONS; DISCOVERY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Overview. n Discovery-Related Considerations n Scope of Discovery n Typical Types of Fact Discovery n Expert Discovery

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1A Article 5 1

EXHIBIT J To THE DECLARATION OF HOLLY GAUDREAU IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR EXPEDITED

UNIFORM RULES RELATING TO DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION

EXAMINATION OUT OF COURT RULE 34 PROCEDURE ON ORAL EXAMINATIONS

AO 88B (Rev. 06/09) Subpoena to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civij ^etlpr

FRCP 30(b)(6) Notice or subpoena directed to entity to require designation of witness to testify on its behalf.

READ THIS BEFORE COMPLETING THE FORMS!!! INSTRUCTIONS FOR MOTION FOR MODIFICATION

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

FILED. 130 Nev., Advance Opinion : etorceireel fxr pablisher-5- Ccr Lf3 MAY IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery; Duty of Disclosure [ Proposed Amendment ]

DECISION ON MOTION. Plaintiff s Requests to Produce 1

LOCAL RULES OF THE DISTRICT COURT. [Adapted from the Local Rules for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana]

Petition, there is. staff for this form. the other party s

Case 4:16-cv RGE-SBJ Document 93 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION

Section 1: Statement of Purpose Section 2: Voluntary Discovery Section 3: Discovery by Order of the Court... 2

R U L E S. of the A R M E D S E R V I C E S B O A R D O F C O N T R A C T A P P E A L S

Case3:14-mc VC Document1 Filed11/04/14 Page1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Goodsell & Olsen, LLP, and Michael A. Olsen and Thomas R. Grover, Las Vegas, for Appellant.

Conducting Effective Motion Practice

133 Nev., Advance Opinion 101 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND R U L E S O R D E R. This Court s Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and

M.R IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. Effective January 1, 2013, Illinois Rule of Evidence 502 is adopted, as follows.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois Domestic Relations Division Calendar #62 Richard J. Daley Center, Room 3010 Chicago, Illinois 60602

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Case No. [redacted]

TAKING AND DEFENDING DEPOSITION September 26, :00-1:00 p.m. Presenter: Thomasina F. Moore, Esq.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. versus Civil Action 4:17 cv 02946

THE JUST, SPEEDY AND INEXPENSIVE DETERMINATION OF EVERY ACTION: FEDERAL EFFORTS TO IMPROVE CIVIL LITIGATION

State of Minnesota In Supreme Court

2:13-cv PDB-MKM Doc # 33 Filed 10/06/14 Pg 1 of 9 Pg ID 305 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Assembly Bill No. 481 Committee on Ways and Means

Discovery Requests in Trademark Cases Under U.S. Law

Issued by the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Case Nurnber:

R in a Nutshell by Mark Meltzer and John W. Rogers

Assembly Bill No. 19 Assemblymen Parks and Hardy CHAPTER...

129 Nev., Advance Opinion 114

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE

IN THE FAMILY DIVISION OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE COUNTY

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. These rules govern the procedure in all civil actions

APPENDIX I SAMPLE INTERROGATORIES

FILED. 130 Nev., Advance Opinion tip AUG IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

[Additions to the text are indicated in underlining and deleted text is shown by strikeover.]

Mark D. Baute, Jeffrey Alan Tidus, Baute & Tidus LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants. ORDER RE MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

PREPARATION OF A TRIAL STATEMENT

JUDICIARY OF GUAM ELECTRONIC FILING RULES 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Living Water Home Educators a New Jersey nonprofit corporation

Iliescu v. Steppan. Opinion. Supreme Court of Nevada May 25, 2017, Filed No

DISTRICT COURT, FAMILY DIVISION CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT POLICY REGARDING NORMAL AVAILABILITY OF OFFICIAL COURT REPORTERS AND PRIVATELY ARRANGED COURT REPORTERS

Chapter 5 DISCOVERY. 5.1 Vocabulary Introduction and Discovery Deadlines Chart The Deposition 6

FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENT OF SEXUALLY VIOLENT PREDATORS

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE

California Enacts Deposition Time Limit

TITLE XIV TRIALS (6/30/03) 84. The amendment is effective as of June 30, 2003.

ORDER ESTABLISHING MOTION PRACTICE PROCEDURE. THIS COURT, having determined the need to facilitate an orderly progression of

PETITION FOR PERMISSION TO MOVE OUT OF STATE GA-9. Self Help Center 1 South Sierra St., First Floor Reno, NV

FLORIDA RULES OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROCEDURE PART I. TRIAL PROCEEDINGS

LCB File No. T PROPOSED TEMPORARY REGULATION OF THE DIVISION OF INSURANCE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY

MINNESOTA JUDICIAL TRAINING UPDATE PARENTING TIME EXPEDITOR VS PARENTING CONSULTANT

132 Nev,, Advance Opinion 82- IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

BOTH SIGNATURES MUST BE IN BLUE INK

Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Remote Video Depositions Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

How to Prepare a Notice of Deposition or Subpoena in Federal Practice (with Forms)

Do Illinois rules expressly permit video recording of depositions, in lieu of stenography?

Nebraska Civil Practice & Procedure Manual

Legal 145b FINAL EXAMINATION. Prepare a Motion to Quash Subpoena.

How to Prepare and Serve a Federal Notice of Deposition or Subpoena (with Forms)

DISCOVERY GONE BAD. CLE Credit: 1.0 Thursday, June 7, :40 a.m. - 10:40 a.m. Segell Room Galt House Hotel Louisville, Kentucky

FLORIDA RULES OF JUVENILE PROCEDURE 2011 Edition

FORT WAYNE-ALLEN COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/18/ :44 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 130 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/18/2015

FLORIDA RULES OF JUVENILE PROCEDURE 2008 Edition

Ch. 41 MEDICAL ASSISTANCE APPEAL PROCEDURES 55 CHAPTER 41. MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROVIDER APPEAL PROCEDURES GENERAL PROVISIONS

Court Administration. Case Management Plan

BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO.

Transcription:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN THE MATTER OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO NEVADA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 26, 30, AND 34. ORDER AMENDING NEVADA RULES or CIVIL PROCEDURE 30 AND 34 ADKT 0487 FILED DEC 1 9 2013 TRA sk, WHEREAS, on March 1, 2013, the Honorable James Hardesty and the Honorable Michael Douglas, Justices of the Nevada Supreme Court, filed a petition in this court seeking the amendment of Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure (NRCP) 30 and 34; and WHEREAS, this court conducted a public hearing on this matter and solicited comments on the proposed amendments from the bench, bar, and public; and WHEREAS, this court has determined that the proposed rule changes are warranted; accordingly IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that NRCP 30 and NRCT 34 shall be amended and shall read as set forth in Exhibit A. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this amendment to the Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure shall be effective March 1, 2014. The clerk of this court shall cause a notice of entry of this order to be published in the official publication of the State Bar of Nevada. Publication of this order shall be accomplished by the clerk disseminating copies of this order to all subscribers of the advance sheets of the Nevada Reports and all persons and agencies listed in NRS 2.345, and to the executive director of the State Bar of Nevada: The certificate of the clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) I947A A5-,MJ/

of this court as to the accomplishment of the above-described publication of notice of entry and dissemination of this order shall- be conclusive evidence of the adoption and publication of the foregoing rules. DATED this ay of December, 2013. C.J. pdesty CUI-A Parraguirre Saitta cc: All District Court Judges Alan Lefebvre, President, State Bar of Nevada Kimberly Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada Clark County Bar Association Washoe County Bar Association First Judicial District Bar Association Administrative Office of the Courts SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 2

AMENDMENT TO NEVADA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RULE 30. DEPOSITIONS [UPON] BY ORAL EXAMINATION * * * Dm [Examination]. Motion to Terminate or Limit (1) [Ail& obj-ee6on] Duration. Unless otherwise stipulated or ordered b the court a de s osition is limited o 1 da of 7 hours. The court or discovery commissioner must allow additional time consistent with Rule M 2 needed the deponent, another erson or an other circumstance im edes or dela s the examination. Instructing a deponent not to answer shall only be allowed when necessary to preserve a privilege, to enforce a limitation directed by the court, or to file a motion under paragraph (3). 2Sanction. court m sanctionincluding nal 3 an party on a person who impedes, delays, or frustrates the fair examination of the deponent. (3) Motion to Terminate or Limit. deposition (A) Grounds and Procedure. At any time during paragraph (3)1, the deponent or a party may move to terminate or limit it on the grounds that it is being conducted in bad faith or in a manner that unreasonably annoys, embarrasses, or oppresses the deponent or party. The motion may be filed in the court where the action is pending or, if the action is sending out of the state where the de osition is taken. If the ob ectin deponent or so demands the deposition must be suspended for the time necessary to obtain an order. ADKT 487 Exhibit A - Page 1

result thereof.] The court may order that the deposition be terminated or may limassmpe and manner as provided in Rule 26(c). If terminated, the deposition may be resumed only by order of the court where the action is pending, [(3)1(C) Award of Expenses. [At any time during the Th-e-provisions-of] Rule 37(a)(4) [apply] applies to the award of expenses incurred in relation to the motion. * * * RULE 34. [PRODUCTION OF] PRODUCING DOCUMENTS [AND THINGS AND ENTRY UPON], ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION, AND TANGIBLE THINGS, OR ENTERING ONTO LAND, FOR INSPECTION AND OTHER PURPOSES (a) [Scope. Any] In General. A party may serve on any other party a request within the scope of Rule 26(b): (1) to produce and permit the requesting party making the ADKT 487 Exhibit A - Page 2

representative to inspect, copy, test, or sample I the following items in the responding party's possession, custody, or control (A) any designated documents or electronically stored. information includin writin s drawin s ra hs charts hoto r hs sound recordings images and other data or data corn ilations stored in an medium from which information can be obtained ither directl necessary, after translation by the respondin form; or a any designated [ I tangible things; or arty into a reasonabl usable 2 to nermit entry onto cd land or otherpy oroert possessed or controlled byjhe respondingpartv. so that the reguestingprty ma ins ect measure surve hoto ra h test or sam le the ro ert or any desi nated ob.ect or o eration on it. (b) Procedure. or if 11) Contents of the Request. The request [shall set forth the particularity I; (A) must describe with reasonable items to be inspected; each item or category of (B) must specify a reasonable time, place, and manner for the inspection and for performing the related acts. and (C ma s ecify the form or forms in which electronically stored information is to be produced. ADKT 487 Exhibit A - Page 3

(2) Responses and Objections. (A) Time to Respond. The party [upon] to whom the request is [ I directed must respond in writing within 30 days after [the service of the request] being served. A shorter or longer time may be [directed] stipulated under Rule 29 or be ordered by the court, [or, in ab-s-cncc of such an order, agreed to in 1-f-ohj-e-etion-is-made] (B Responding to Each Item. For each item or category the response must either state that inspection and related activities will be permitted as requested or state the ground for objecting to the request, with specificity, includin g fc Ob c ions. An objection must state whether aiiy responsive materials are being withheld on the basis of that objection. An objction to part of [an item or category, the part shall be specified and] a request must specify the part and permit inspection [permitted] of the [remaining parts] rest. (D) Responding to Request for Production of Electronically Stored Information. The response Ye-quest-4 ma state an ol*ction a requested form for producin electronically stored information. If the respondin party objects to a mquested form or if no form was specified in the request the party must state the form or forms it intends to use. ADKT 487 Exhibit A - Page 4

(E) Producing the Documents. or Electronically Stored Information. Unless otherwise_aipulated or ordered by the -court, these procedures appjy to producing documents or electronically stored. information: (i)a party must produce documents as they are kept in the usual course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the request; jj) If a. re _g mst does not spçjfyform for producing electronicall stored information a art must roduce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms; and (Hi) A party need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form. (c) [ Nonparties. As provided in Rule 45 nonparty may be compelled to produce documents, electronically stored information and tangible things or to [submit-to] permit an inspection, [as-pr-evieled-in-rule-45,] (d) Expenses of Copying. The party requesting that documents be copied must pay the reasonable cost therefor and the court may, upon such terms as are just, direct the respondent to copy the documents. ADKT 487 Exhibit A - Page 5