Information Regarding Video Surveillance of Certain Special Education Settings

Similar documents
Chapter 157. Hearings and Appeals. Subchapter EE. Informal Review, Formal Review, and Review by State Office of Administrative Hearings

DATE ISSUED: 11/14/ of 5 UPDATE 109 AF(LEGAL)-P

The Honorable Mike Morath Commissioner of Education Texas Education Agency 1701 N. Congress Ave. Austin, Texas 78701

GENERAL COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION PROCEDURES

FRISCO ISD. Our mission is to know every student by name and need.

No. TEXAS AMERICAN FEDERATION IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF OF TEACHERS and TEXAS STATE TEACHERS ASSOCIATION. v. TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS

UNITED STATES FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT Washington, D.C. RULES OF PROCEDURE Effective November 1, 2010

CHAPTER 53 UNIFORM ADULT GUARDIANSHIP JURISDICTION

ADMINISTRATIVE RULES FOR CONTESTED CASE HEARINGS MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN. Effective June 1, 2016 Amended June 19, 2017

Access to Public Records

XX... 3 TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION... 3 CHAPTER 815. UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE... 4

Standing Practice Order Pursuant to 20.1 of Act Establishing Rules Governing Practice and Procedure in Medical Assistance Provider Appeals

Opinions and Written Advice

POST-GRANT REVIEW UNDER THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT GERARD F. DIEBNER TANNENBAUM, HELPERN, SYRACUSE & HIRSCHTRITT LLP

ETHICS ADVISORY COMMISSION RULES OF PROCEDURE CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS. Adopted: 10/27/06

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO SENATE BILL 719

RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE NOTICE

Notes on how to read the chart:

SEC. 6. AIA: POST-GRANT REVIEW PROCEEDINGS

IC Chapter 3. Adjudicative Proceedings

Relevant Excerpts of the Rules of the City of New York Title 61 - Office of Collective Bargaining Chapter 1 - Practice and Procedure

N.J.A.C. 6A:3, CONTROVERSIES AND DISPUTES TABLE OF CONTENTS

Alberta Human Rights Commission. Bylaws. Pursuant to section 17(1) of the. Alberta Human Rights Act

XX... 3 TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION... 3 CHAPTER 819. TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION... 4

Federal Information Technology Supply Chain Risk Management Improvement Act of 2018 A BILL

City of Tacoma. Procedures for Public Disclosure Requests

IMPASSE RESOLUTION PROCEDURES MANUAL ( ) Pg. 1 of 9

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Senate Bill 868 SUMMARY

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER n: DISPUTE RESOLUTION

ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE

Uniform Adult Guardianship and Protective Proceedings Jurisdiction Act

Ch. 41 MEDICAL ASSISTANCE APPEAL PROCEDURES 55 CHAPTER 41. MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROVIDER APPEAL PROCEDURES GENERAL PROVISIONS

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Local Rules 39.0 ELECTRONIC FILING OF COURT DOCUMENTS

RULE 16. Exhibits and Evidence

ACCESS TO PORT PUBLIC RECORDS

scc Doc 51 Filed 07/16/15 Entered 07/16/15 15:54:38 Main Document Pg 1 of 23

RULES OF TENNESSEE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION CHAPTER PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - CONTESTED CASES TABLE OF CONTENTS

California University of Pennsylvania Right-to-Know Policy

THE STATE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the

Investigations and Enforcement

Administrative Rules for the Office of Professional Regulation Effective date: February 1, Table of Contents

Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School Public Safety Act Risk Protection Order Court Staff Manual

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Enrolled. Senate Bill 719 CHAPTER... AN ACT

TITLE 40. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT. CHAPTER 1. PURPOSE, APPLICABILTY, and DEFINITIONS

JUDICIAL PRACTICE PREFERENCES FOR CIRCUIT FAMILY

Chelsea District Library Policy and Procedure

TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION

3RD CIRCUIT LOCAL APPELLATE RULES Proposed amendments Page 1

KENT DISTRICT LIBRARY FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) PROCEDURES & GUIDELINES Effective July 1, 2015

22 CCR Denial of a Renewal License. 22 CCR Deficiencies in Compliance.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2015 H 1 HOUSE BILL 817. Short Title: Enact Uniform Law on Adult Guardianship. (Public)

CHAPTER 5. FORMAL PROCEEDINGS

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS KANSAS OPEN MEETING ACT (KOMA) RULES Revision date: May 2009

Overview Dispute Resolution: Due Process and Other Complaints

NC General Statutes - Chapter 35B 1

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION GENERAL RULES

RULES OF PROCEDURE BEFORE THE COWLITZ COUNTY HEARINGS EXAMINER

NEW ENGLAND ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES, INC.

3. APPLICATION: This policy applies to all County Elected officials, Department Heads, Employees and Agencies of St. Clair County.

ALABAMA SURFACE MINING COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE CODE

27:24 NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER JUNE 17,

PROBATE, ESTATES AND FIDUCIARIES CODE (20 PA.C.S.) - UNIFORM ADULT GUARDIANSHIP AND PROTECTIVE PROCEEDINGS JURISDICTION Act of Jul. 5, 2012, P.L.

RULE 5. Initiated Ordinance Petitions. (Enacted 6/06/12)

SUBCHAPTER 14C - CONTESTED CASES SECTION GENERAL RULES

A. The following official is hereby designated as the Open-Records Officer, at the following address:

INFORMATION BULLETIN

RULE 3. [Reserved] CHAPTER III. PETITION PRACTICE AND PLEADING

REVIEW REPORT

Ch SPECIAL PROVISIONS 52 CHAPTER SPECIAL PROVISIONS

VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE &C Page 2

United States Patent and Trademark Office and Japan Patent Office Collaborative Search. AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce.

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, EAST BAY

Rule 8400 Rules of Practice and Procedure GENERAL Introduction Definitions General Principles

MEMO: AP Change 1. DATE: June 9, WIB Directors WIB Chairpersons Grant Recipients. Mark A. Stankiewicz WIA Program Manager

Freedom of Information Act Procedures, Guidelines and Written Public Summary

ONTARIO SECURITIES COMMISSION PRACTICE GUIDELINE

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION PROCEDURE Amended 12/14/00 - FA Amended 06/02/15 FA

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES

CHAPTER 5.14 PUBLIC RECORDS

If municipal court records are not subject to the PIA, can the public get these records?

HOUGHTON COUNTY. FOIA Procedures and Guidelines

REVISED AS OF MARCH 2014

City and County of Denver CAREER SERVICE HEARING OFFICE PROCEDURAL GUIDE

The Maine Freedom of Access Act

Michael Kasperski Keith Latz Glenn Bergmark Victoria Cobbett Richard Rimbo. Tim Oslakovich Glenn Bergmark Keith Latz David Boersema William Musselman

Using the New York State Freedom of Information Law

KALISPEL TRIBE OF INDIANS

Municipal Records And Open Records. Zindia Thomas Assistant General Counsel Texas Municipal League

RULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION BUREAU OF TENNCARE

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Procedures and Guidelines

TEMPORARY INJUNCTION FOR PROTECTION AGAINST STALKING

SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE ON SENATE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 2389

GALESBURG-CHARLESTON MEMORIAL DISTRICT LIBRARY FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES

Nevada Constitution Article 19 Section 1. Referendum for approval or disapproval of statute or resolution enacted by legislature. Sec. 2.

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT

Illinois Freedom of Information Act

DOCKET NO. 006-R DEIRDRE FIELDS BEFORE THE V. COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION ALIEF INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT THE STATE OF TEXAS

UNIFORM ADULT GUARDIANSHIP AND PROTECTIVE PROCEEDINGS JURISDICTION ACT

Transcription:

Information Regarding Video Surveillance of Certain Special Education Settings Information Regarding Video Surveillance of Certain Special Education Settings and the Commissioner s Review of Actions Concerning Video Cameras in Special Education Settings Senate Bill (SB) 507 from the 84th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2015, created Texas Education Code (TEC), 29.022, which requires video surveillance to promote the safety of students receiving special education and related services in certain self-contained classrooms and other special education settings. The Texas Education Agency (TEA) adopted rule in August 2016 and amended the rule in March 2017. The related rule is at http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/rules/tac/chapter103/ch103dd.html. Senate Bill 1398 from the 85th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2017 amended TEC, 29.022 to provide clarification on who may make a request for cameras, on how a request must be made, on how local educational agencies (LEAs) must respond to requests for cameras, and on who may review a recording made under TEC, 29.022 and under what circumstances this can occur. The amended statute includes timelines for having cameras in operation following a request. The amended statute also includes the right to ask TEA to expedite a review of 1) a school district s denial for cameras, 2) a school district s request to extend the timeline to put the cameras in operation, and 3) a school district s determination not to release a recording. To meet requirements at revised TEC, 29.022, TEA has proposed rule that amends current 19 TAC 103.1301 and that proposes new 19 TAC 103.1303. Proposed 19 TAC 103.1303 sets forth procedures for requesting an agency review of a district s decision related to installing cameras in certain special education settings, including procedures for requesting an expedited review of that decision. These procedures will be place until, following the comment period, the agency adopts the final versions of 19 TAC 103.1301 and 19 TAC 103.1303. At that time, the procedures in adopted 19 TAC 103.1303 will control. For reference, the proposed procedures are below. 103.1303. Commissioner's Review of Actions Concerning Video Cameras in Special Education Settings. (a) Applicability. This section shall apply to all hearings and reviews of actions taken under Texas Education Code (TEC), 29.022, concerning school districts. To the extent that this section conflicts with any other sections governing hearings before the commissioner of education, including Chapter 157, Subchapter AA of this title (relating to General Provisions for Hearings Before the Commissioner of Education) and Subchapter BB of this title (relating to Specific Appeals to the Commissioner), this section shall prevail.

(b) Denial of request. The following standards and procedures apply to a denial of a request for the placement of a video camera or the determination not to release a video to a person under TEC, 29.022. (1) Once a request for placement of a video camera or a request to release a video is administratively denied under TEC, 29.022(i) or (l)(2), the requestor must exhaust administrative remedies through the school district's grievance process before the denial of the request is appealed to the commissioner. (2) After local remedies are exhausted, the requestor may appeal the denial to the commissioner under TEC, 7.057. (3) The following timelines are established. (B) A petition for review shall be filed with the commissioner within 20 days of the decision of the board of trustees being first communicated to the requestor or requestor's counsel, whichever occurs first. The petition for review shall be made in accordance with 157.1073(c) of this title (relating to Hearings Brought Under Texas Education Code, 7.057) and may include a request for expedited review. The district's answer and local record shall comply with 157.1052(b) and (c) of this title (relating to Answers) and 157.1073(d) of this title and shall be filed with the commissioner within 20 days of the school district receiving notification from the commissioner of the appeal. (4) A request for expedited review is governed by the following. (B) (C) (D) A request for expedited review shall be filed with the commissioner within 20 days of the school district receiving notification from the commissioner that a petition for review has been filed. If no request for an expedited review is timely made, the case will proceed according to the procedures for an appeal under TEC, 7.057. A school district, parent, staff member, or administrator may request an expedited review. Any request for an expedited review shall include the names, telephone numbers, and addresses of all interested parties to the request. Interested parties are all persons who brought the grievance and all persons who testified or made written statements during the grievance process. If a timely request for expedited review is filed, the commissioner shall notify all interested persons that an expedited review has been filed and of their right to file arguments in accordance with the briefing schedule. All interested parties shall receive all filings in the case. The commissioner shall send to all interested parties the petition for review, the request for expedited review, and all other filings in the case as of the time the request for expedited review is filed. All persons filing any document in the case after the commissioner has provided to the interested parties the documents on file at the time the request for an expedited review is made shall provide each interested party, the petitioner, and the respondent with

(c) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) a copy of the additional filing, which shall be sent by the filing party to each interested party by the same method as the filing is sent to the commissioner. All briefing and exceptions to the proposal for decision and replies to the same in a case where expedited review is requested shall have citations to the record to support all alleged facts and shall have appropriate citations to legal authority to support all legal claims. If a request for expedited review is timely filed, the commissioner will establish a briefing schedule. All interested parties who are in favor of granting the request for expedited review shall file briefing at the time specified for the petitioner. All interested persons who are opposed to granting the request for expedited review shall file briefing at the same time as the respondent. Briefing is not limited to the issues specifically raised in the pleadings in the case. However, no new arguments may be raised in the reply briefs. Reply briefs may contain new citations to the record and legal authority. A proposal for decision shall be issued which applies the substantial evidence standard to the local record. A proposal for decision shall constitute the preliminary judgment in an appeal. Exceptions to a proposal for decision shall be filed within 10 days of the issuance of the proposal for decision. (L) Replies to exceptions to a proposal for decision shall be made within 20 days of the issuance of the proposal for decision and shall respond to the arguments made in the exceptions to the proposal for decision. (M) (N) (O) If no exceptions to the proposal for decision are timely filed, the commissioner will issue a decision in the case. If exceptions to the proposal for decision are timely filed, the commissioner will issue a decision in the case after the time for replies to exceptions to a proposal for decision has passed. A decision of the commissioner under this subsection is appealable under TEC, 7.057(d). Extension of time. A request for an extension of time to begin the operation of a video camera under TEC, 29.002, shall be made and decided using the following procedures. (1) Any request by a school district for an extension of time to begin the operation of a video camera shall be filed with the commissioner prior to the 45th school business day after a request to begin operating a video camera is received. (2) A request for an extension of time to begin the operation of a video camera shall specify why an extension of time should be granted. The request shall include affidavits supporting any factual claims made in the request and reference any legal authority as to why the request should be granted. The request may include a

request for expedited review. The request shall name the individual who requested the installation of cameras and provide the individual's address and telephone number. Immediately following the individual's address and telephone number there shall appear in bold type: "You have been identified as the individual who requested the operation of a video camera that is the subject of this request to the commissioner of education to extend the statutory timeline. You may but are not required to participate in the proceedings before the commissioner concerning the school district's request for an extension of time. It is entirely up to you whether and to what extent you wish to participate in these proceedings. The procedures governing these proceedings are found at 19 Texas Administrative Code 103.1303(c) and Texas Education Code, 29.022." (3) A request for an extension of time to begin the operation of a video camera shall list the names, telephone numbers, and addresses of all interested parties to the request. All interested parties include all parents of students in the classroom or other special education setting for which a video camera has been requested and all staff who provided services in a class for which a video camera has been requested. (4) All documents in a case shall be filed with the Division of Hearings and Appeals, Texas Education Agency, 1701 N. Congress Avenue, Austin, Texas 78701, facsimile number (512) 475-3662. Documents can be filed by mail, delivery, or facsimile. All documents must be actually received by the Division of Hearings and Appeals by the date specified in this section. The mailbox rule does not apply to filings in this case. Filing by facsimile is strongly encouraged. (5) All filings in a case shall be sent to the school district, the individual who initially requested the installation of the cameras, and all interested parties who have filed a request to receive documents filed in this case by the same method as the request is filed with the commissioner. Due to the requirements of Family Education Rights and Privacy Act, the names, telephone numbers, and addresses of parents and other publicly identifiable student information may not be given out to the interested parties. The copies of the filings sent to interested parties shall redact all publicly identifiable student information. (6) Any response to a request for an extension of time to begin the operation of a video camera shall be filed with the commissioner by an interested party within 20 days of the filing of the request. If no response to the request is timely filed, the commissioner shall issue a final decision within 30 days of the filing of the request. (7) A response to a request for an extension of time to begin the operation of a video camera shall specify why an extension of time should or should not be granted. The response shall include affidavits supporting any factual claims made in the request and reference any legal authority as to why the request should or should not be granted. The response may include a request for expedited review. (8) A request for expedited review must be filed with the commissioner within 20 days of the filing of the request for an extension of time to begin the operation of a video camera. If a request for expedited review is made, all interested parties

shall be notified that they have been identified as interested parties in the request for an extension of time to begin the operation of a video camera. In particular the interested parties will be informed that it is their choice whether or not to participate in the proceedings before the commissioner, that it is entirely up to them to determine to what extent they wish to participate in the proceedings, that the procedures governing these proceedings are found in this subsection and TEC, 29.022, and that upon their written request filed with the commissioner they will be sent all filings in this case. (9) If a request for an expedited review is not made, the commissioner shall issue a final decision within 45 days of the filing of the request for an extension of time to begin the operation of a video camera, unless the commissioner determines that an evidentiary hearing would be helpful in deciding the issues raised. If the commissioner decides to hold an evidentiary hearing, the commissioner shall establish the timelines and procedures to be used. Whether to conduct the hearing by telephone or other electronic methods will be considered. (10) If a request for expedited review is made, the following procedures shall be followed. Any reply by the school district to any response to the request shall be filed with the commissioner within 25 days of the filing of the request for an extension of time to begin the operation of a video camera. (B) A preliminary judgment shall be made by the commissioner within 35 days of the filing of the request for an extension of time to begin the operation of a video camera. (C) (D) (E) Any interested party or the school district may file objections to preliminary judgment within 40 days of the filing of the request for an extension of time to begin the operation of a video camera. Any reply to an objection to a preliminary judgment must be filed within 45 days of the filing of a request for an extension of time to begin the operation of a video camera. The commissioner shall issue a final decision within 55 days of the filing of the request for an extension of time to begin the operation of a video camera, unless the commissioner determines that an evidentiary hearing would be helpful in deciding the issues raised. If the commissioner decides to hold an evidentiary hearing the commissioner shall establish the timelines and procedures to be used. Whether to conduct the hearing by telephone or other electronic methods will be considered. (11) A commissioner's final decision under this subsection is not subject to appeal.