HOW TO SUCCESSFULLY PRESENT YOUR CASE IN ARBITRATION

Similar documents
LA. REV. STAT. ANN. 9:

US Code (Unofficial compilation from the Legal Information Institute) TITLE 9 ARBITRATION

UNIFORM ARBITRATION ACT 1955 ACT. An Act relating to arbitration and to make uniform the law with reference thereto

Act Relating to Arbitration and to Make Uniform the Law with Reference Thereto

TUNICA-BILOXI TRIBE OF LOUISIANA ARBITRATION CODE GENERAL PROVISIONS

Uniform Arbitration Act. Md. Courts & Judicial Proceedings COURTS AND JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS TITLE 3. COURTS OF GENERAL JURISDICTION

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1 Article 45C 1

TITLE 8. EMPLOYMENT CHAPTER 1. EMPLOYEE REVIEW CODE

Uniform Arbitration Act; Mediation or Arbitration of Trust Instruments; HB 2571

The Role of Modern Arbitration in the Progressive Development of Florida Law

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This [act] may be cited as the Uniform Family Law

Changes in Supplementary Local Rules Effective February 1, 2013 Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for Multnomah County

Appendix XXIX-B. Note: Adopted July 27, 2015 to be effective September 1, 2015.

STATE BAR OF MICHIGAN POSITION By vote of the Representative Assembly on April 16, 2005

ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS

3 GTBC Appointment and Compensation

Civil Tentative Rulings

Arbitration vs. Litigation

Case: 5:10-cv SL Doc #: 20 Filed: 07/15/11 1 of 8. PageID #: 626 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

In and for the Parish of East Baton Rouge State of Louisiana

Case 2:16-cv Document 20 Filed 02/23/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 150 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

(4) the term "contractor" means a party to a Government contract other than the Government;

Case 3:09-cv B Document 17 Filed 06/17/10 Page 1 of 9 PageID 411 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

THE ARBITRATION ACT (X OF 1940) An Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to Arbitration. CHAPTER 1

CHAPTER 06:01 ARBITRATION

JACKSON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT SUPPLEMENTARY LOCAL RULES FEBRUARY 1, 2016 (PROPOSED)

Case 1:14-cv LGS Document 15 Filed 04/08/15 Page 1 of 6. : Petitioner, : : : :

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL CASE NO. 1:16-cv MR-DLH

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No. 919 SEPTEMBER TERM, LETITIA L. ELLIOTT et al.

BERMUDA 1986 : 34 ARBITRATION ACT

Case 8:15-cv PWG Document 34 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 6. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND Southern Division

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

LOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION LAWYER DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM RULES (Prev. Rev. 10/06/00) Effective May 1, Preamble

AMENDMENTS TO ORCP 39. promulgated by COUNCIL ON COURT PROCEDURES to 2016

31 U.S.C. Section 3733 Civil investigative demands

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE On-Brief May 25, 2007

Copyright Juta & Company Limited

Department of Labor Relations TABLE OF CONTENTS. Connecticut State Labor Relations Act. Article I. Description of Organization and Definitions

TITLE 3 MUNICIPAL COURT CHAPTER 1 1 TOWN COURT ADMINISTRATION 2

Arbitration Act of Swaziland Kingdom of Swaziland (Swaziland - Royaume du Swaziland)

Requirements for Grain Dealers

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND SOUTHERN DIVISION

[SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) ARE UNCHANGED]

ACT. (English text signed by the State President) (Assented to 5th April, 1965) ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS DEFINITIONS

CHAPTER 20 RULE DISCIPLINE AND DISABILITY: POLICY JURISDICTION

RULE 24. Compulsory arbitration

SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA

NFA Arbitration: Resolving Customer Disputes

Arbitration-Related Litigation in Texas

BERMUDA LEGISLATURE (APPOINTMENT, ELECTION AND MEMBERSHIP CONTROVERSIES) ACT : 153

IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION., ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant.

Case 2:16-cv JHS Document 16 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA OPINION

RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF STATE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES DIVISION

7:05 PREVIOUS CHAPTER

MSC RULE 12 EFFECTIVE APRIL 2014

Title 1. General Provisions

District of Columbia Court of Appeals Board on Professional Responsibility. Board Rules

THE ARBITRATION ACT, 1944

Papua New Guinea Consolidated Legislation. Arbitration Act 1951

MAINE BAR ADMISSION RULES

THE ARBITRATION ACT, An Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to Arbitration.

(1) This article shall be titled the Office of Inspector General, Palm Beach County, Florida Ordinance.

RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW COURT

General Rules of Practice and Procedure

CONTROVERTED ELECTIONS (PROVINCIAL) ACT

STREAMLINING THE EMPLOYMENT ARBITRATION PROCESS

CHAPTER 3:04 SUMMARY JURISDICTION (APPEALS) ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

WYOMING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR CIRCUIT COURTS

Utah Court Rules on Trial Motions Francis J. Carney

CHAPTER 4.08 ARBITRATION ORDINANCE

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cv AT. versus

Case 2:11-mc VAR-MKM Document 3 Filed 02/14/11 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Chapter 36 Mediation and Arbitration 2015 EDITION

THE PHI KAPPA TAU FRATERNITY CLAIM AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION PLAN AND RULES

section:2409 edition:prelim) OR (granul...

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA PIMA COUNTY ORDER AMENDING RULE 8 LOCAL RULES OF PRACTICE PIMA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

*** THIS FILE INCLUDES ALL REGULATIONS ADOPTED AND PUBLISHED THROUGH THE *** *** NEW JERSEY REGISTER, VOL. 43, NO. 4, FEBRUARY

RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION

CHAPTER 16 EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES - UNLAWFUL DISCRIMINATION

THE FEDERAL FALSE CLAIMS ACT 31 U.S.C

DSCC Uniform Administrative Procedures Policy

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION CITYWIDE TESTING AND INSPECTION INC. NO CA-0018 COURT OF APPEAL VERSUS SHAW ENVIRONMENTAL INC.

Mediator and Miscellaneous Provisions. ARTICLE 1 MEDIATION

AMENDMENTS TO ORCP 46. promulgated by COUNCIL ON COURT PROCEDURES to 2016

NC General Statutes - Chapter 150B Article 3 1

BELIZE ALIENS ACT CHAPTER 159 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER n: DISPUTE RESOLUTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS ORDER OF THE COURT

The court annexed arbitration program.

CHARTERED INSTITUTE OF STOCKBROKERS ACT

THE LOUISIANA VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION COUNSELORS LICENSING ACT

S17G1097. BROWN et al. v. RAC ACCEPTANCE EAST, LLC. After RAC Acceptance East, LLC swore out a warrant for Mira Brown s

INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF NIGERIA ACT

ARBITRATION RULES. Commercial Brokers Association

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D

Implied consent to chemical analysis; mandatory revocation of license in event of refusal; right of driver to request analysis.

CHARTERED INSTITUTE OF TAXATION OF NIGERIA ACT

ARTICLE 20 GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE AND ARBITRATION

Transcription:

HOW TO SUCCESSFULLY PRESENT YOUR CASE IN ARBITRATION 1999 Michael G. Hanlon* Portland, Oregon *Presented to a Continuing Legal Education Seminar sponsored by the Oregon State Bar and Consumer Law Section June 18, 1999: Arbitration - How to Avoid it, Make it Stick, and Succeed in It.

I. PRIMARY OREGON AUTHORITY 1 A. ORS 36.300 et seq. (Private Arbitration by Written Agreement) B. ORS 36.400 et seq. (Court Arbitration Program) C. UTCR Chapter 13 (only applicable to Court Arbitration Program) D. Each Circuit Court s SLR 13 (only applicable to Court Arbitration Program) E. Common Law Halvorson-Mason Corp. v. Emrick Const. Co., 304 Or 407, 412, 745 P2d 1221 (1987); Kaiser Foundation Health Plan v. Doe, 136 Or App 566, 577, 903 P2d 365 (1995), modified 138 Or App 428, 508 P2d 850 (1996) (stating when arbitration statutes do not apply, the common law of arbitration is still in place and an oral agreement to arbitrate is enforceable). II. ARBITRATION SHOULD BE AN INEXPENSIVE, SIMPLIFIED PROCESS A. The primary purpose of arbitration is to avoid litigation. Brewer v. Allstate Insurance Co., 248 Or 558, 562, 436 P2d 546 (1968). B. Unless the amount in dispute warrants the time and expense, minimize discovery requests. 1. UTCR 13.140 permits the arbitrator to balance the benefits of discovery against the burdens and expenses. Most arbitrators will use the same standard. 2. ORS 36.335 gives arbitrators the power to compel the attendance of witnesses and to enforce the production of documents from parties if the arbitrator deems them material to the cause. C. Organize your presentation. 1. Pre-mark your exhibits with sequentially numbered exhibit stickers. Make an additional full set of exhibits for your opponent and yourself. Exhibit numbers should attempt to follow the order of your witnesses. 1 International arbitration rules are found at ORS 36.450 et seq. Collective Bargaining Grievance Procedures exist at ORS 243.650 et seq.

2. UTCR 13.170 requires the exchange of lists of exhibits and witnesses 14 days prior to the hearing. 3. In preparing for the hearing, the elements of your claim or defense should be listed together with your method of proof (see sample forms). 4. Prepare a brief memorandum of controlling legal authorities (with pin cites). a. Consider enclosing copies of highly relevant cases for the arbitrator s ease of reference, especially if from a foreign jurisdiction. III. FILING THE AWARD A. Private arbitration awards. 1. The award and the agreement to submit the matter to arbitration must be filed with the Circuit Court together with a fee of $35. Exceptions must be filed within 20 days of service of the award. ORS 36.350. No exceptions can be filed without the payment of a $35 fee. ORS 36.355 (2). 2. The grounds for exceptions to an arbitrator s award are: a. The award was procured by corruption, fraud or undue means. b. There was evident partiality or corruption on the part of the arbitrators, or any of them. c. The arbitrators were guilty of misconduct in refusing to postpone the hearing, upon sufficient cause shown, or in refusing to hear evidence pertinent and material to the controversy; or of any other misbehavior by which the rights of any party were prejudiced. d. The arbitrators exceeded their powers, or so imperfectly executed them that a mutual, final and definite award upon the subject matter submitted was not made. e. There was an evident material miscalculation of figures or an evident material mistake in the description of any person, thing or property referred to in the award. f. The arbitrators awarded upon a matter not submitted to them, unless it was a matter not affecting the merits of the decision upon the matters submitted.

g. The award was imperfect in matter of form not affecting the merits of the controversy. 3. Standards of Judicial Review. Oregon favors the view that confines judicial review to the strictest possible limits. Brewer, 248 Or at 561-62. Neither a mistake of law or fact vitiates an award. Mahaffy v. Gray, 242 Or 522, 525, 410 P2d 822 (1966); Native Sun v. L & H Development, Inc., 149 Or App 623, 629, 944 P2d 995 (1997). In order to overturn an arbitration award, the award must be deemed so grossly erroneous as to strike at the heart of the decision - making process. Brewer, 248 Or at 563; Native Sun, 149 Or App at 629. B. Court Mandated Arbitration Awards 1. The arbitrator files the award at the conclusion of the proceeding together with proof of service on the parties. ORS 36.425 2. Within 20 days of the filing of the award, a party may file a notice of appeal and request a trial de novo. The party must pay a trial or jury fee together with a $150 fee. ORS 36.425

Evidence List Claim/Defense Elements Mode of Proof (Witness/Exhibit)

Witness List Witness Fact Exhibit

ORS 36.300. Controversies arbitrable. PERTINENT OREGON REVISED STATUTES All persons desiring to settle by arbitration any controversy or quarrel, except such as respect the terms or conditions of employment under collective contracts between employers and employees or between employers and associations of employees, may submit their differences to the award or umpirage of any person or persons mutually selected. (Formerly 33.210) ORS 36.305. Written arbitration agreements valid. A provision in any written contract to settle by arbitration a controversy thereafter arising out of such contract, or out of the refusal to perform the whole or any part thereof, or an agreement in writing between persons to submit to arbitration any controversy then existing between them, shall, provided the arbitration is held within the State of Oregon, be valid, irrevocable and enforceable, save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract. (Formerly 33.220) ORS 36.310. Court order compelling parties to arbitrate as agreed. A party aggrieved by the failure, neglect or refusal of another to perform under a contract or submission providing for arbitration, described in ORS 36.305, shall petition the circuit court, or a judge thereof, for an order directing that the arbitration proceed in the manner provided for in the contract or submission. Ten days' notice in writing of the application shall be served upon the party in default, in the manner provided for personal service of a summons. The court or judge shall hear the parties, and if satisfied that the making of the contract or submission or the failure to comply therewith is not an issue, shall make an order directing the parties to proceed to arbitration in accordance with the terms of the contract or submission. If the making of the contract or submission or the default is an issue, the court or the judge shall proceed summarily to the trial thereof. If no jury trial is demanded by either party, the court or judge shall hear and determine such issue. Where such an issue is raised, any party may, on or before the return day of the notice of application, demand a jury trial of the issue, and if such demand is made, the court or judge shall make an order referring the issue to a jury in the manner provided by ORCP 51 D. If the jury finds that no written contract providing for arbitration was made or submission entered into, as the case may be, or that there is no default, the proceeding shall be dismissed. If the jury finds that a written contract providing for arbitration was made or submission was entered into and there is a default in the performance thereof, the court or judge shall make an order summarily directing the parties to proceed with the arbitration in accordance with the terms thereof. (Formerly 33.230)

ORS 36.315. Abatement of action or suit involving arbitrable issue. If any action, suit or proceeding is brought upon any issue arising out of an agreement which contains a provision for arbitration of the matter in controversy in such action, suit or proceeding, then, upon application, any judge of a circuit court, upon being satisfied that the issue is referable to arbitration, shall abate the action, suit or proceeding so that arbitration may be had in accordance with the terms of the agreement. The application shall be heard similarly to hearings on motions. (Formerly 33.240) ORS 36.320. Appointment of arbitrator; number of arbitrators. If, in the arbitration agreement, no provision is made for the manner of selecting the arbitrators, or if, for any reason, there is a failure to act or a vacancy, and no provision in the agreement for the filing thereof, then, upon application of any party to the agreement, any court of record shall appoint an arbitrator or arbitrators to fill the vacancy, who shall act with the same force and effect as if specifically named in the arbitration agreement. Unless otherwise provided, the arbitration shall be by a single arbitrator. (Formerly 33.250) ORS 36.330. Compensation of arbitrators. The compensation of arbitrators shall be determined by agreement between the parties to the arbitration, or, in case of their inability to agree, then by any judge of the circuit court. (Formerly 33.270) ORS 36.340. Coercion of witness or party. Whenever, on motion of any arbitrator or party in interest, it appears to the circuit court of the county in which the arbitration proceedings are pending that any witness or party has refused to answer a subpoena or obey any lawful order of the arbitrator, the court may require the witness or party to show cause why the witness or party should not be punished for contempt of court, to the same extent and purpose as if the proceedings were pending before the court. (Formerly 33.290)

ORS 36.355. Exceptions to award; filing fees. 1. Within the period specified in ORS 36.350, the party against whom an award was made may file with the circuit court exceptions in writing to the award for any of the following causes: a. The award was procured by corruption, fraud or undue means. b. There was evident partiality or corruption on the part of the arbitrators, or any of them. c. The arbitrators were guilty of misconduct in refusing to postpone the hearing, upon sufficient cause shown, or in refusing to hear evidence pertinent and material to the controversy; or of any other misbehavior by which the rights of any party were prejudiced. d. The arbitrators exceeded their powers, or so imperfectly executed them that a mutual, final and definite award upon the subject matter submitted was not made. e. There was an evident material miscalculation of figures or an evident material mistake in the description of any person, thing or property referred to in the award. f. The arbitrators awarded upon a matter not submitted to them, unless it was a matter not affecting the merits of the decision upon the matters submitted. g. The award was imperfect in matter of form not affecting the merits of the controversy. 2. The clerk of the court shall collect from the party filing exceptions under subsection (1) of this section a filing fee of $35, and from a party filing an appearance in opposition to the exceptions a filing fee of $21. However, if the exceptions relate to an arbitration award made following abatement under ORS 36.315 of an action, suit or proceeding in respect to which the parties have paid filing fees under ORS 21.110, no filing fees shall be collected under this subsection. No exceptions or appearance in opposition thereto shall be deemed filed unless the fee required by this subsection is paid by the filing party. (Formerly 33.320; 1997 c. 801 54)