CONTENT ANALYSIS OF TELEVISION TALK SHOWS

Similar documents
CONTENT ANALYSIS OF TELEVISION TALK SHOWS

ELECTIONS 2018: POLITICAL COMMUNICATIONS & DIGITAL DEMOCRACY PARTIES ONLINE. A survey of the online footprint of political parties in Pakistan

GALLUP & GILANI PAKISTAN NEWSPAPER CONTENT ANALYSIS REPORT

Critical Analysis of Political Economy of Media in Pakistan s General Elections 2013

Society for Alternative Media and Research (SAMAR) is a non-

National Survey of Current Political Situation in Pakistan. June 13-July 04, 2018

IRI Index: Pakistan. Voters were also opposed to the various measures that accompanied the state of emergency declaration.

FWU Journal of Social Sciences, Winter 2017, Vol.11, No..2, Political Rhetoric; Slogan Politics in Pakistan and Role of Parliament

Assessment of the Quality of General Election 2013

FAFEN S REPORT ON ATTENDANCE AND QUORUM. in National Assembly of Pakistan. June, March, 2018 FREE AND FAIR ELECTION NETWORK

30 YEARS OF POLLING ON CRIMES, VIOLENCE, TERRORISM & SOCIAL EVILS

PAKISTAN S NATIONAL ELECTION: Report # 3 EXIT POLL SURVEY REPORT. Who Voted for Whom and What does it mean for PAKISTAN S FUTURE

Political Awareness and Media s Consumption Patterns among Students-A Case Study of University of Gujrat, Pakistan

Radicalization: Perceptions of Educated Youth in Pakistan

Asian Journal of Empirical Research

Abstract. Peace, Talks, Terrorism, Taliban, Military, Operation, Consensus, Government.

FAFEN PARLIAMENT MONITOR 40th SESSION

PUBLIC VERDICT ON DEMOCRACY Based on a nationally-representative Survey

NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF PAKISTAN FAFEN PARLIAMENT MONITOR

FAFEN PARLIAMENT MONITOR PROFILES OF PROVINCIAL ASSEMBLIES

Effects of Selective Exposure of GEO TV and ARY TV on the Perceptions of Viewers regarding the Electoral Rigging Issue in Pakistan: An Assessment

Political Snapshot January 2014

Keywords: Political bias, Talk shows, MQM, Pakistan Political Party, Local body elections, Content analysis, Political participation

Women s. Learning and. Leadership (WILL) Strengthening Women s Political. IN Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) Baseline Research and Needs Assessment Study

Media Consumption and Consumers Perceptions of Media Manipulation

Many Players, New Tools in Pakistani Elections

National Security Strategy for Pakistan. Report. December 01, 2011 THE INSTITUTE OF STRATEGIC STUDIES, ISLAMABAD

FAFEN PARLIAMENT MONITOR

FAFEN PARLIAMENT MONITOR

Social Media and Youth Participatory Politics: A Study of University Students

GENDER ACTION MANIFESTO. Andrea Fleschenberg Rabeea Hadi

Legislative Study Tour

U.S.A VS TALIBAN: VIEWERS OPINION REGARDING WAR AGAINST TERRORISM

Critical Discourse Analysis of Prime Minister s Speeches on Harmful Aerial Vehicles (Drones)

FAFEN PARLIAMENT MONITOR

Politics of Power sharing in Post-1971 Pakistan

FAFEN PARLIAMENT MONITOR th

FP7 SP1 Cooperation Project Type: Collaborative Project Project Number: SSH7-CT MEDIA & CITIZENSHIP

GENERAL ELECTION 2018

Craig Charney December, 2010

The Ten Nation Impressions of America Poll

Political Development Update. Political Violence Shackles Karachi

The Role of Media in Increasing Turn-out in Election 2013: A Survey Study of Multan, Punjab, Pakistan

Will politicians take politics to the Tribal region?

EXIT POLL ELECTION DAY SURVEY

Working Paper No Dynastic Politics in Punjab: Facts, Myths and their Implications

FAFEN PARLIAMENT MONITOR 37th SESSION

Useful Vot ing Informat ion on Political v. Ente rtain ment Sho ws. Group 6 (3 people)

SURVEY ASSESSING BARRIERS TO WOMEN OBTAINING COMPUTERIZED NATIONAL IDENTITY CARDS (CNICs) February 2013

January 28-1 July Nationwide Opinion Poll. In the lead-up to Pakistan s General Election 2018

Pakistani Newspapers on Peace Talks with Tahrik e Taliban Pakistan

Imran Khan and the Pakistani Elections: Political Visions, Coalitions and Prospects. Iqbal Singh Sevea and Faiza Saleem 1

Electoral Failure of Religious Political Parties in Pakistan: An Analysis with Special Reference to Jamaat-E-Islami

Biographies of main political leaders of Pakistan

Key Findings and Analysis.

Challenges of Skill Development and Employment in Punjab. Dr. Aliya H. Khan Professor of Economics Quaid-i-Azam University Islamabad

Prepared by Dil-E-Nadan Campus[psmd01]Samundri

Manifestos Analysis Report

PUBLIC FORUMS ON GOOD GOVERNANCE

The Gilgit-Baltistan Reforms 2009

Guest Lecture Report on ROLE OF MEDIA IN CONFLICT MANAGEMENT: CONFLICT REPORTING FROM FATA

The Role of Political Parties in Political Development of Pakistan

Unveiling the Unwilling

IRI Pakistan Index. Three Crises: Economic, Political and Security

European Union Election Observation Mission Islamic Republic of Pakistan General elections 25 July 2018 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

A Comparative Analysis of Election Manifestoes of Major Political Parties

17 th Constitutional Amendment & Its Aftermath: The Role of Muttahidda Majlis-i-Amal (MMA)

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF THE NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTE-ASIAN NETWORK FOR FREE ELECTIONS INTERNATIONAL ELECTION OBSERVATION MISSION TO PAKISTAN

ECOSOC I Adam McMahon (Deputy Chair) MY-MUNOFS VI Feb 28 Mar

CRS Report for Congress

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT. Account of the mission to observe the Parliamentary and Provincial Assembly elections in Pakistan.

BEFORE THE HON'BLE ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN.

INDONESIA REPORT (ENGLISH)

NWX-WOODROW WILSON CENTER. May 9, :30 am CT

The Role of Ethnicity in Sindh (A Case Study of MQM)

World a better place with predominately women politicians: says a third of respondents to global poll

Pakistan s Scheduled 2008 Election: Background

14 th. National Assembly's Contributions to Foreign Affairs, Anti-Terrorism and CPEC

Report- In-House Meeting with Mr. Didier Chaudet Editing Director of CAPE (Center for the Analysis of Foreign Affairs)"

Attitudes towards the EU in the United Kingdom

Understanding differences; Acting on commonalities. Peace is a Journey... Take the first step with us PROGRESS REPORT

Political Development in Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA): A Step to Minimizing Extremism and Radicalization

Pakistan. Militant Attacks, Counterterrorism, and Reprisals

Freedom of association

Curriculum of Secondary Level

ANNUAL SURVEY REPORT: REGIONAL OVERVIEW

Karachi Operation. Zia Ur Rehman

November 15-18, 2013 Open Government Survey

PERCEPTIONS OF THE REFUGEE CRISIS OF GERMANY THE REFUGEE CRISIS GERMANY. TENT has partnered with global research agency

A Study about Women s Presence in the Media Coverage of the Municipal Elections 2016 Executive Summary

Embassy Newsletter November 2013

Report- Book Launch 88 Days to Kandahar A CIA Diary

PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF THE REFUGEE CRISIS GERMANY JANUARY 2016

Research Department State Bank of Pakistan, Karachi. Monetary Economics, Macroeconomics, Applied Econometrics

IRI Index: Pakistan. Social and Political Indicators

CURRICULUM VITAE. University of Wales Aberystwyth (UK). University of the Punjab, Lahore

Understanding Employment Situation of Women: A District Level Analysis

TABLE OF CONTENTS. 1. Introduction Project Overview Need Assessment Objectives... 2

SECTION 4: IMPARTIALITY

PAKISTAN Freedom of assembly should not be curtailed again on 1 May

Transcription:

CONTENT ANALYSIS OF TELEVISION TALK SHOWS Prepared by April 18 th, 2013 Disclaimer: Gallup Pakistan is not related to Gallup Inc. headquartered in Washington D.C. USA. We require that our surveys be credited fully as Gallup Pakistan (not Gallup or Gallup Poll). We disclaim any responsibility for surveys pertaining to Pakistani public opinion except those carried out by Gallup Pakistan, the Pakistani affiliate of Gallup International Association. For details on Gallup International Association, see website: www.gallup-international.com [ 1 ]

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY/ SYNOPSIS SECTION 1: WHO? WHO CONDUCTED THE PROGRAMS? WHO PARTICIPATED IN THE PROGRAMS? SECTION 2: WHO GETS HOW MUCH TIME? HOW TALK TIME IS SHARED? SECTION 3:WHAT TOPICS ARE DISCUSSED? SECTION 4:HOW DOES THE HOST CONDUCT THE PROGRAM? METHODOLOGY: [ 2 ]

INTRODUCTION: Most of the media research focuses on the viewer ship of the Television Programs in terms of number of Viewers and their Socio-demographic Profile. Survey Researchers do not give analysis of the Content of the Programs frequently watched by the Audience. Here we are providing an innovation in Media research by statistically analyzing the content of TV talk Shows which are amongst the highly watched Programs in Pakistan. The analysis is done to explore the hypothesis: Do all stakeholders especially representatives of all political parties get equal or due chance to express their views in the talk shows? We have entered in pre-election phase. It is the most important time in conveying political parties message through press and media especially TV talk shows. Having seen some of the recent programs we have felt there is an urgent need for party spokes person/ representatives who are extremely professional in public speaking and can clearly highlight party agenda to general public. We have made a list of all the programs that belong to the Genre under study i.e. Current affairs/talk Shows shown on 6 Television Channels. From this list we have selected 11 Programs. Below is the Statistical Analysis based on monitoring of these 11 TV TALK SHOWS shown on 6 TV Channels. We monitored these Programs for duration of 10 Weeks from December 1 st, 2012 to January 31 st, 2013. A total of 294 Episodes were monitored in this period. The list of programs and their relative share in our analysis is given below: Program NUMBER (N) Aaj kamran khan kay sath 41 14% Islamabad Tonight 40 14% Capital Talk 38 13% Tonight with Jasmeen 37 13% Off The Record 33 11% Live With Tallat 28 10% Aapas ki baat 27 9% Sawal Yeh Hai 25 9% To the point 15 5% Meray Mutabiq 6 2% News Eye 4 1% Total 294 100% % This is obviously a result of what was chosen to be monitored by the Research Team. [ 3 ]

How the Analysis is done? This analysis of the monitored Programs is in terms of four broad components i.e. who (host and participants) said what (topics) in how much time and how (characteristics of host)? Each of these components is explained below: WHO? This lists and analyzes the participants of each program. We have categorized the participants into different profiles e/g. Politicians, Analysts, Journalists, Subject Experts, Civil Society-NGOs representatives, Serving and Retired Civil-Military Officers etc. WHAT? This tells us the topic of discussion in each program. Again, the topics have been categorized into main topics and subtopics e.g. Domestic and International Politics, Society, Business etc. The Subtopics list the specific issue under discussion e.g. Floods, Budget, Terrorism and other specific socio-political debates. HOW MUCH TIME? This tells us about the time each participant and host got to express their opinions in the program. HOW THE HOST CONDUCTED THE PROGRAM? This tells us about how the host conducted the program, was he/she impartial, did he/she conducted the discussion in a pleasant manner etc. [ 4 ]

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A total of 294 Episodes of 11 TV Talk Shows on 6 Television Channels were monitored for approximately 10 Weeks from December 1st, 2012 to January 31 st, 2013. Our Quantitative Analysis to explore the hypothesis, Do all stakeholders especially representatives of all political parties get equal or due chance to express their views in the talk shows? using the framework who (host and participants) said what (topics) in how much time and how (characteristics of host)? shows following salient features: WHO? A total of 992 Guests participated in the programs. The majority (59%) were politicians followed by Media Persons (17%) and Professionals (13%). Among the politicians share among the major political parties was PPP (24%), PML-N (22%) and PTI (15%). Among the Hosts, in our monitored programs over the specified period, Nadeem Malik had the largest share (14%) followed by Hamid Mir, Kamran Khan and Jesmeen Manzoor (13% each) and Talat Hussain and Kashif Abbasi (10% each). Please note that, this depends on the number of time the program of each of these hosts is shown in a Week. WHAT? Among the topics discussed on Talk shows, politics dominates (80%) followed by social issues (52%). Other subjects such as economy (6%), international affairs (4%) got low share. Within politics, the major share is of discussion on democracy (61%) followed by political performance/ ratings (50%). Governance issues have 21% share among political discussions. Among social issues, the most common discussion was on Society and Crime covering 61% of the total. HOW MUCH TIME? The total air time of the 294 talk shows was 11,320 minutes with share of guests as 7,692 minutes (68%) and host as 3,628 minutes (32%). The average talk time of the shows was 38 minutes with average guest and host time as 26 minutes and 12 minutes respectively. Politicians shared 63% of the total air time among all guests followed by media persons having 16% share among the guests time. PPP got the highest air time as their representatives had 25% of the total air time of guests. PTI with 16% of the air time closely followed PML-N which grabbed 20% of the talk time among all guests. HOW THE HOST CONDUCTED THE PROGRAM? Overall the hosts and programs seemed unbiased except shows of Jasmeen who had some biased discussion towards some specific political parties. Overall 73% of the shows were peaceful whereas 68% shows of Jasmeen Manzoor and 55% of Kashif Abbasi had disordered [ 5 ]

discussions. Please note that these findings could be subjective on the perception of the researcher. [ 6 ]

SECTION 1: WHO? [ 7 ]

WHO CONDUCTED THE PROGRAMS? Table 1: Share of hosts in the monitored programs 1 Name of Host TV channel on which Share % program aired Nadeem Malik Aaj News 14% Hamid Mir Geo News 13% Kamran Khan 2 Geo News 13% Jasmeen Manzoor Samaa TV 13% Kashif Abbasi ARY News 10% Talat Hussain Express News 10% Munib Farooq Geo News 8% Dr. Danish ARY News 7% Shahzeb Khanzada Express News 5% Servat William Geo News 2% Meher Abbasi Dawn News 1% Adil Abbasi ARY News 1% Najam Sethi Geo News 1% Qurat ul Ain Hassan ARY News 1% Masood Raza Geo News 1% Figure 1: Share of channels in monitored TV talk shows 14% 15% 13% 1% 20% 38% Geo News ARY News Express News Aaj News Samaa TV Dawn 1 This depends on the number of time the Program of each of these hosts is shown in a Week. 2 The format of Kamran Khan show is of one man show which is different from others [ 8 ]

Nadeem Malik of Aaj News got the highest share (14%) in hosting the talk shows during December-January 2012-13. Kamran Khan, Hamid Mir and Jasmeen Manzoor were also among the top 5 hosts in terms of total number of programs monitored. WHO PARTICIPATED IN THE PROGRAMS? TYPES OF GUEST SPEAKERS IN THE PROGRAMS A total of 992 Guests appeared in these Programs during the Study Period. The Distribution of type of Guest Speaker is as follows: (More than one Guest might participate in one Program) Figure 2: Type of guest speakers who participated in TV talk shows (N=992) 7% 13% 17% 59% Politician Civil Official Military Official Media Academic/Professional Civil Society 2% 2% A total of 992 Guests participated in the programs. The majority (59%) were politicians followed by Media Persons (17%) and Professionals (13%). Military & Civil Officials and civil society representatives got the lowest shares as 4% and 7% respectively. A complete List of Guests and the number of times they appeared on these Programs during the Study Period can be provided on request. [ 9 ]

Among the Politicians (n=584), the break up by Party 3 is as follows: Figure 3: Type of guest speakers segmented among politicians 6% 3% 2% 1% 3% 10% 24% PPP PML-N PTI MQM TMQ 7% ANP Jamat-e-Islami 9% 22% PML-HK PML-Q 15% JUI-F Others Pakistan People s Party- Parliamentarian group (24%) got the highest share among guest speaker categories followed by PML N (22%) and PTI (15%). MQM had 9% of shares followed by TMQ (7%). ANP was the 6 th most invited party with 6% share among the politicians. Note: Similarly further details on the Categories of other Guest Speakers mentioned before can be provided. 3 PPPP: Pakistan Peoples Party Parliamentarians PML-N: Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz) MQM: Mutaheda Qoumi Movement PTI: Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf PML-Q: Pakistan Muslim League (Quaid-e-Azam) ANP: Awami National Party TMQ: Tehreek Minhaj ul Quran PML-HK: Pakistan Muslim League (Hum Kheyal) JUI-F: Jamiat Ulma Islam (Fazal ur Rehman) [ 10 ]

SECTION 2: WHAT? [ 11 ]

WHAT TOPIC WAS DISCUSSED? DISTRIBUTION OF TOPICS DISCUSSED IN THESE PROGRAMS DURING STUDY PERIOD Broadly speaking, a total of 240 different topics were discussed. The topics discussed in these programs can be broadly classified as follows Figure 4: Type of topics discussed in TV talk shows Consumer/Commercial Media Defence issues International General Economy Social Politics 1% 1% 3% 4% 6% 52% Politics Social Economy International General Defence issues Media Consumer/Commercial 80% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% * : Multiple response question therefore sum of percentages may exceed 100 Among the topics discussed on Talk shows, Politics dominates (80%) followed by Social Issues (52%). Consumer/commercial and media got the lowest shares. [ 12 ]

Within each Topic Category, there are many sub-topics that were discussed. Their relative distribution is as follows: Sub topics for Politics are given below: (N=234) Figure 5: Type of topics discussed segmented under Politics Defence 6% National Institutions 18% Governance 21% Political performance/ratings/debates 50% Democracy 61% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% * : Multiple response question therefore sum of percentages may exceed 100 Politics: Among the sub topics under the category of Politics discussed on Talk shows, Democracy (61%) dominates significantly due to the Long March fame followed by Political Performance/Ratings (50%) and Governance (21%). [ 13 ]

Similarly among 154 topics that were related to Society and Social issues, the distribution of sub topics is as follows: Figure 6: Type of topics discussed segmented under Social issues Women 1% Festivals & Events 1% sports 10% Social Behavior 18% Social issues 30% Society & Crime 61% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% * : Multiple response question therefore sum of percentages may exceed 100 Social Issues: 61% share of social issues is mostly attributed towards Society and Crime. Reason behind this is the extensive target killings and bomb blasts in the months of December 2012 to January 2013. [ 14 ]

SECTION 3: HOW MUCH TIME? [ 15 ]

HOW MUCH TIME DO HOST AND PARTICIPANTS GET TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS? A: DISTRIBUTION BETWEEN HOST AND GUESTS A total airtime of 11,320 minutes for 294 programs was monitored during the study period. Share among host and participants was: Figure 7: Time distribution between guests and hosts 32% Host air time Guests airtime 68% [ 16 ]

Name of the Host Content analysis of Television Talk Shows Does the distribution vary by Host? Figure 8: Time distribution by hosts Kamran Khan *Masood Raza *Najam Sethi Dr. Danish Munib Farooq Talat Hussain Hamid Mir *Meher Abbasi Jasmeen Shahzeb Kashif Abbasi Nadeem Malik *Qurat ul Ain *Adil Abbasi *Servat William Proportion of Guests Proportion of Hosts 37% 63% 63% 67% 67% 68% 68% 69% 71% 76% 78% 78% 79% 82% 85% 88% 37% 33% 33% 32% 32% 31% 29% 24% 22% 22% 21% 18% 15% 12% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Proportion of time Among the hosts, Kamran Khan is the only one who takes more time to speak than his guests. On average he took 63% of his program duration to speak. One of the reasons of this significant difference with the other programs is the format of the program which is commonly called oneman show. Nadeem Malik is the most time giving host with 79% of his program s duration given to the guests followed by Kashif Abbasi and Shahzaib Khanzada with 78% each and Jasmeen Manzoor (76%). Hamid Mir and Talat Hussain shared 69% and 68% of their program duration respectively with their guests. [ 17 ]

Name of the Host Name of the Host Content analysis of Television Talk Shows Does the distribution vary by Gender of Host? Figure 9: Time distribution by hosts - Male Kamran Khan *Masood Raza *Najam Sethi Dr. Danish Munib Farooq Talat Hussain Hamid Mir Shahzeb Kashif Abbasi Nadeem Malik *Adil Abbasi Proportion of Guests Proportion of Hosts 37% 63% 63% 67% 67% 68% 68% 69% 78% 78% 79% 85% 37% 33% 33% 32% 32% 31% 22% 22% 21% 15% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Proportion of time Figure 10: Time distribution by hosts - Female Proportion of Guests Proportion of Hosts *Meher Abbasi 71% 29% Jasmeen Manzoor 76% 24% *Qurat ul Ain Hassan 82% 18% *Servat William 88% 12% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Proportion of time Exploring time distribution of talk shows between host and guests by gender of host showed that female hosts gave relatively more time to their guests compared to male hosts. Keeping the different formats of shows in mind, Dr. Danish in Sawal yeh hai actively participated in the programs as he just gave 67% of his program time for participation by guest speakers. [ 18 ]

B. DISTRIBUTION BETWEEN THE GUESTS: The total time shared by guest speakers was 7692 minutes during 294 episodes of December- January 2012-13. Among the Guests, time share between politicians and other analysts was as follows: Figure 11: Time distribution by guests type 10% 6% 16% 4% 2% 63% Politician Military Official Academic/Professional Civil Official Media Civil Society The total time grabbed by Politicians was 4808 minutes which makes their total participation in talk shows time of 63%. The Media followed with 16% share in the total air time allocated to guests. [ 19 ]

Political parties Content analysis of Television Talk Shows C. DISTRIBUTION BETWEEN POLITICAL PARTIES: The politicians airtime for talk shows was 4808 minutes. Within politicians, share of time by different parties was as follows: Figure 12: Time distribution by political parties 4 Others JUI-F PML-Q Jamat-e-Islami PML-HK ANP MQM TMQ PTI PML-N PPP 38 69 95 100 234 378 406 558 760 979 1192 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Time share in minutes The top 3 political parties whose representatives took the major chunk of 61% of the total air time allocated to politicians were PPP, PML-N and PTI. The highest share was of PPP which being the ruling party dominated most of the discussions during the study period. 4 PPPP: Pakistan Peoples Party Parliamentarians PML-N: Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz) MQM: Mutaheda Qoumi Movement PTI: Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf PML-Q: Pakistan Muslim League (Quaid-e-Azam) ANP: Awami National Party TMQ: Tehreek Minhaj ul Quran PML-HK: Pakistan Muslim League (Hum Kheyal) JUI-F: Jamiat Ulma Islam (Fazal ur Rehman) [ 20 ]

SECTION 4: HOW WAS PROGRAM CONDUCTED? [ 21 ]

HOW DID THE HOST CONDUCT THE PROGRAM? A. MODE OF GUEST APPEARANCE IN THE PROGRAM: Figure 13: Mode of Guest Participation 2% On stage :All present in studio 53% 35% Off stage :All participated through phone Mix: Some on phone and some in studio 9% Open program/special transmission For more than half (53%) of the monitored shows during December-January 2012-13, the guests appeared in the program both on phone and in studio whereas 35% of the programs had all guests present in the studio. [ 22 ]

B. HOST CHARACTERISTICS: WAS THE HOST BIASED TOWARDS ANY SPECIFIC GUEST/PARTY? Table 2: Characteristic of hosts (Biased or Non-biased) Dr. Danish Hamid Mir Kamran Khan Nadeem Malik Talat Hussain Ashar Zaidi Munib Farooq Jasmeen Manzoor Servat William Meher Abbasi Kashif Abbasi Najam Sethi Shahzeb Khanzada Adil Abbasi Qurat ul ain Hasan BASE: WAS HOST BIASED? All Talk Shows Yes No Count 294 15 279 % 100% 5% 95% Count 22 1 21 % 100% 5% 95% Count 37 1 36 % 100% 3% 97% Count 37 0 37 % 100% 0% 100% Count 40 0 40 % 100% 0% 100% Count 28 0 28 % 100% 0% 100% Count 1 0 1 % 100% 0% 100% Count 24 2 22 % 100% 8% 92% Count 37 9 28 % 100% 24% 76% Count 6 0 6 % 100% 0% 100% Count 4 0 4 % 100% 0% 100% Count 29 2 27 % 100% 7% 93% Count 3 0 3 % 100% 0% 100% Count 15 0 15 % 100% 0% 100% Count 4 0 4 % 100% 0% 100% Count 3 0 3 % 100% 0% 100% Although overall shows run with very little bias but there seemed some kind of biasness towards specific political parties in the shows hosted by Jasmine Manzoor. [ 23 ]

C. HOST CHARACTERISTICS: DID THE HOST TRY TO RECONCILIATE AMONG PARTICIPANTS? Table 3: Characteristic of hosts (Trying to reconcile) BASE: All Talk Shows Yes, he/she did when needed DID THE HOST TRY TO RECONCILIATE AMONG PARTICIPANTS No, he/she didn't even when needed There was Peaceful Discussion Count 294 27 51 216 % 100% 9% 17% 73% Dr. Danish Hamid Mir Kamran Khan Nadeem Malik Talat Hussain Ashar Zaidi Munib Farooq Jasmeen Manzoor Servat William Meher Abbasi Kashif Abbasi Najam Sethi Shahzeb Khanzada Adil Abbasi Qurat ul ain Hasan Count 22 0 0 22 % 100% 0% 0% 100% Count 37 3 4 30 % 100% 8% 11% 81% Count 37 0 5 32 % 100% 0% 14% 86% Count 40 1 7 32 % 100% 3% 18% 80% Count 28 2 1 25 % 100% 7% 4% 89% Count 1 0 0 1 % 100% 0% 0% 100% Count 24 0 0 24 % 100% 0% 0% 100% Count 37 21 4 12 % 100% 57% 11% 32% Count 6 0 0 6 % 100% 0% 0% 100% Count 4 0 1 3 % 100% 0% 25% 75% Count 29 0 16 13 % 100% 0% 55% 45% Count 3 0 0 3 % 100% 0% 0% 100% Count 15 0 7 8 % 100% 0% 47% 53% Count 4 0 4 0 % 100% 0% 100% 0% Count 3 0 2 1 % 100% 0% 67% 33% Overall more than two third of the monitored programs (December-January 2012-13) had peaceful discussions but it seemed that Kashif Abbasi and Shahzeb Khanzada made less efforts to reconcile between the guest speakers and hence their discussions were not very peaceful. [ 24 ]

D. HOST CHARACTERISTICS: DID THE HOST WRAP UP DISCUSSION WITH CONCLUSIONS? Table 4: Characteristic of hosts (Wrapped up the program with conclusions) BASE: All Talk Shows DID THE HOST WRAP UP DISCUSSION WITH CONCLUSIONS? Yes No Count 294 165 129 % 100% 56% 44% Dr. Danish Hamid Mir Kamran Khan Nadeem Malik Talat Hussain Ashar Zaidi Munib Farooq Jasmeen Manzoor Servat William Meher Abbasi Kashif Abbasi Najam Sethi Shahzeb Khanzada Adil Abbasi Qurat ul ain Hasan Count 22 10 12 % 100% 45% 55% Count 37 23 14 % 100% 62% 38% Count 37 35 2 % 100% 95% 5% Count 40 7 33 % 100% 18% 82% Count 28 27 1 % 100% 96% 4% Count 1 1 0 % 100% 100% 0% Count 24 1 23 % 100% 4% 96% Count 37 10 27 % 100% 27% 73% Count 6 0 6 % 100% 0% 100% Count 4 2 2 % 100% 50% 50% Count 29 24 5 % 100% 83% 17% Count 3 0 3 % 100% 0% 100% Count 15 15 0 % 100% 100% 0% Count 4 4 0 % 100% 100% 0% Count 3 3 0 % 100% 100% 0% The way the hosts wrapped up their shows were equally divided between those with conclusions and without conclusions. Shazeb Khanzada, Qurat u lain, Adil Abbasi and Ashar Zaidi wrapped up all of their monitored shows followed by Talat Hussain (96%), Kamran Khan (95%) and Kashif Abbasi (83%). [ 25 ]

METHODOLOGY WHAT ARE WE OFFERING? Methodology: This Report states a new Methodology of analyzing the most popular Television Programs in terms of their Content e.g. if we talk of Current Affairs Programs and take them as a Genre of Programs then How to know that how many different Programs are being shown of this Genre(Current Affairs) on various Television Channels? What these Programs are about i.e. what topics they cover? Who participates in these Programs as analysts, and who hosts these Programs? How the time is distributed among the different types of analysts? Do all political parties get their share? HOW DO WE ANALYZE THE CONTENT? Please Note: We have presented this method by taking Current Affairs/ Talk Shows Programs as a Genre of Programs since they are amongst highly watched Programs in the Country. We have made a list of all the programs that belong to the Genre under study i.e. Current Affairs/ Talk Shows shown on a list of 6 Television Channels in Pakistan. This gives us a comprehensive list of 11 Programs. Please note that this list has been prepared in consultation with Experts in this field. Each New Episode of all these Programs (one or more times every week) is recorded and analyzed in detail according to the following format: A Researcher watches the recorded program and records the following features of the program using a structured questionnaire. This analysis is in terms of four broad components i.e. who said what, in how much time and how? Each of these components is explained below: WHO? This lists and analyzes the participants of each program. We have categorized the participants into different profiles e/g. Politicians, Analysts, Journalists, Subject Experts, Civil Society-NGOs representatives, Serving and Retired Civil-Military Officers etc. [ 26 ]

WHAT? This tells us the topic of discussion in each program. Again, the topics have been categorized into main topics and subtopics e.g. Domestic and International Politics, Society, Business etc. The Subtopics list the specific issue under discussion e.g. Floods, Budget, Terrorism and other specific socio-political debates. HOW MUCH TIME? This tells us about the time each participant and host got to express their opinions in the program. HOW THE HOST CONDUCTED THE PROGRAM? This tells us about how the host conducted the program, was he/she impartial, did he/she conducted the discussion in a pleasant manner etc. HOW CAN CONTENT ANALYSIS BE USEFUL? This analysis tells us: 1. Which Topics have been discussed over past few weeks or months? This gives the trends based on the political/ social circumstances? 2. What is the mix of Analysts in these Programs, are they the politicians, Journalists, Subject Experts, Civil Society-NGOs representatives, or Serving and Retired Civil-Military Officers etc? 3. Which political parties are getting a chance to express their opinions? 4. Is there a just allocation of time to all political parties? 5. How good is the host in conducting the discussion? This in depth analysis can be very useful for Media Professionals, Social Scientists, Anthropologists, Political analysts, Journalists etc. [ 27 ]

Contact Details: Ms. Saima Adnan Deputy General Manager Customized Research Division Gallup Pakistan Karachi saima.adnan@gallup.com.pk Karachi:+92 213 4537569 Lahore:+92 423 5916635 Islamabad:+92 51 2655630 Fax:+92 51 2655632 Email: isb@gallup.com.pk Disclaimer: Gallup Pakistan is not related to Gallup Inc. headquartered in Washington D.C.USA. We require that our surveys be credited fully as Gallup Pakistan (not Gallup or Gallup Poll). We disclaim any responsibility for surveys pertaining to Pakistani public opinion except those carried out by Gallup Pakistan, the Pakistani affiliate of Gallup International Association. For details on Gallup International Association see website: www.gallup-international.com [ 28 ]