CONTENT ANALYSIS OF TELEVISION TALK SHOWS

Similar documents
CONTENT ANALYSIS OF TELEVISION TALK SHOWS

National Survey of Current Political Situation in Pakistan. June 13-July 04, 2018

IRI Index: Pakistan. Voters were also opposed to the various measures that accompanied the state of emergency declaration.

ELECTIONS 2018: POLITICAL COMMUNICATIONS & DIGITAL DEMOCRACY PARTIES ONLINE. A survey of the online footprint of political parties in Pakistan

FWU Journal of Social Sciences, Winter 2017, Vol.11, No..2, Political Rhetoric; Slogan Politics in Pakistan and Role of Parliament

GALLUP & GILANI PAKISTAN NEWSPAPER CONTENT ANALYSIS REPORT

Critical Analysis of Political Economy of Media in Pakistan s General Elections 2013

Society for Alternative Media and Research (SAMAR) is a non-

Assessment of the Quality of General Election 2013

Many Players, New Tools in Pakistani Elections

FAFEN PARLIAMENT MONITOR

FAFEN PARLIAMENT MONITOR PROFILES OF PROVINCIAL ASSEMBLIES

Effects of Selective Exposure of GEO TV and ARY TV on the Perceptions of Viewers regarding the Electoral Rigging Issue in Pakistan: An Assessment

Will politicians take politics to the Tribal region?

Radicalization: Perceptions of Educated Youth in Pakistan

Women s. Learning and. Leadership (WILL) Strengthening Women s Political. IN Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) Baseline Research and Needs Assessment Study

FAFEN S REPORT ON ATTENDANCE AND QUORUM. in National Assembly of Pakistan. June, March, 2018 FREE AND FAIR ELECTION NETWORK

PAKISTAN S NATIONAL ELECTION: Report # 3 EXIT POLL SURVEY REPORT. Who Voted for Whom and What does it mean for PAKISTAN S FUTURE

Electoral Failure of Religious Political Parties in Pakistan: An Analysis with Special Reference to Jamaat-E-Islami

NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF PAKISTAN FAFEN PARLIAMENT MONITOR

PUBLIC VERDICT ON DEMOCRACY Based on a nationally-representative Survey

FAFEN PARLIAMENT MONITOR

GENDER ACTION MANIFESTO. Andrea Fleschenberg Rabeea Hadi

FAFEN PARLIAMENT MONITOR 40th SESSION

FAFEN PARLIAMENT MONITOR th

Imran Khan and the Pakistani Elections: Political Visions, Coalitions and Prospects. Iqbal Singh Sevea and Faiza Saleem 1

Political Awareness and Media s Consumption Patterns among Students-A Case Study of University of Gujrat, Pakistan

Abstract. Peace, Talks, Terrorism, Taliban, Military, Operation, Consensus, Government.

Social Media and Youth Participatory Politics: A Study of University Students

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF THE NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTE-ASIAN NETWORK FOR FREE ELECTIONS INTERNATIONAL ELECTION OBSERVATION MISSION TO PAKISTAN

Pakistan Elections 2018: Likely Winners, Runners and Losers

30 YEARS OF POLLING ON CRIMES, VIOLENCE, TERRORISM & SOCIAL EVILS

FAFEN PARLIAMENT MONITOR

Karachi Operation. Zia Ur Rehman

Electoral Politics and Electoral Violence in 2013 Elections: The Case of Punjab

Politics of Power sharing in Post-1971 Pakistan

IRI Pakistan Index. Three Crises: Economic, Political and Security

European Union Election Observation Mission Islamic Republic of Pakistan General elections 25 July 2018 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

FAFEN PARLIAMENT MONITOR 37th SESSION

Prepared by Dil-E-Nadan Campus[psmd01]Samundri

Coverage of the Issue of Judiciary Crisis in National Newspapers of Pakistan

ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN

Biographies of main political leaders of Pakistan

Pakistan s Scheduled 2008 Election: Background

Keywords: Political bias, Talk shows, MQM, Pakistan Political Party, Local body elections, Content analysis, Political participation

A Comparative Analysis of Election Manifestoes of Major Political Parties

The Role of Media in Increasing Turn-out in Election 2013: A Survey Study of Multan, Punjab, Pakistan

Manifestos Analysis Report

Reflection on the Electoral History of Pakistan ( ) BACKGROUND PAPER. Citizens' Group on Electoral Process - CGEP

Agenda of Religious-Political Organizations. Analysis JAN-MAR. Jan-Mar P a g e Conflict and Peace Studies, Volume 4, Number 1

PUBLIC FORUMS ON GOOD GOVERNANCE

EXIT POLL ELECTION DAY SURVEY

Media Consumption and Consumers Perceptions of Media Manipulation

Pakistani Election: The Khan Factor versus Reform Challenges

Working Paper No Dynastic Politics in Punjab: Facts, Myths and their Implications

NWX-WOODROW WILSON CENTER. May 9, :30 am CT

The Ten Nation Impressions of America Poll

Comparison between 1956 and 1962 Constitution of Pakistan

Asian Journal of Empirical Research

Key Findings and Analysis.

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT. Account of the mission to observe the Parliamentary and Provincial Assembly elections in Pakistan.

SURVEY ASSESSING BARRIERS TO WOMEN OBTAINING COMPUTERIZED NATIONAL IDENTITY CARDS (CNICs) February 2013

January 28-1 July Nationwide Opinion Poll. In the lead-up to Pakistan s General Election 2018

Unveiling the Unwilling

Craig Charney December, 2010

Filling the Void: Evidence from Two Natural Disasters on the. Determinants of Taliban Support

Political participation

FP7 SP1 Cooperation Project Type: Collaborative Project Project Number: SSH7-CT MEDIA & CITIZENSHIP

Useful Vot ing Informat ion on Political v. Ente rtain ment Sho ws. Group 6 (3 people)

IRI Index: Pakistan. Social and Political Indicators

Political Snapshot January 2014

Pakistan General Elections 2018 Update

Moving beyond Musharraf. Matthew J. Nelson

CRS Report for Congress

National Security Strategy for Pakistan. Report. December 01, 2011 THE INSTITUTE OF STRATEGIC STUDIES, ISLAMABAD

Critical Discourse Analysis of Prime Minister s Speeches on Harmful Aerial Vehicles (Drones)

Political Development in Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA): A Step to Minimizing Extremism and Radicalization

BEFORE THE HON'BLE ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN.

Organised by the Refugee Documentation Centre, Ireland and UNHCR Dublin, May 2004 COUNTRY PROFILE PAKISTAN

Challenges of Skill Development and Employment in Punjab. Dr. Aliya H. Khan Professor of Economics Quaid-i-Azam University Islamabad

S4C Guidelines on Programme Compliance, Conflict of Interest and Political Interests Published May 2017

Afghan Peace Accord (Islamabad Accord) Recalling the glorious success of the epic Jehad waged by the valiant Afghan people against foreign occupation,

PAKISTAN Freedom of assembly should not be curtailed again on 1 May

Guest Lecture Report on ROLE OF MEDIA IN CONFLICT MANAGEMENT: CONFLICT REPORTING FROM FATA

Police Firearms Survey

Freedom of association

INDONESIA REPORT (ENGLISH)

DELEGATION TO OBSERVE THE PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS IN THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN. (14-21 February 2008)

GENERAL ELECTION 2018

WHAT IS PUBLIC OPINION? PUBLIC OPINION IS THOSE ATTITUDES HELD BY A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF PEOPLE ON MATTERS OF GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS

2002 Elections in Pakistan: A Reappraisal. Kamran Aziz Khan. Abstract

FAFEN PARLIAMENT MONITOR PROVINCIAL ASSEMBLY OF PUNJAB

ANNUAL SURVEY REPORT: REGIONAL OVERVIEW

MONITOR. Civil-Military Relations in Pakistan March 2017

Previewing Pakistan s 2018 General Election

November 15-18, 2013 Open Government Survey

The Role of Political Parties in Political Development of Pakistan

In the light of Bhuttto's obsession with power, former Air Marshall M. Asghar Khan, who was heading

A SNAPSHOT INTO ELECTION HISTORY IN PAKISTAN

Security Council Distr. GENERAL

Transcription:

CONTENT ANALYSIS OF TELEVISION TALK SHOWS For the Month of August, 2014 Prepared by 25 th September, 2014 Disclaimer: Gallup Pakistan is not related to Gallup Inc. headquartered in WashingtonD.C.USA. We require that our surveys be credited fully as Gallup Pakistan (not Gallup or Gallup Poll). We disclaim any responsibility for surveys pertaining to Pakistani public opinion except those carried out by Gallup Pakistan, the Pakistani affiliate of Gallup International Association. For details on Gallup International Association, see website: www.gallupinternational.com [ 1 ]

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY/ SYNOPSIS SECTION 1: WHO? WHO CONDUCTED THE PROGRAMS? WHO PARTICIPATED IN THE PROGRAMS? SECTION 2: WHO GETS HOW MUCH TIME? HOW TALK TIME IS SHARED? SECTION 3: WHAT TOPICS ARE DISCUSSED? SECTION 4: HOW DOES THE HOST CONDUCT THE PROGRAM? METHODOLOGY: HOW DO WE ANALYZE THE CONTENT? HOW CAN CONTENT ANALYSIS BE USEFUL? [ 2 ]

INTRODUCTION: Most of the media research focuses on the viewer ship of the Television Programs in terms of number of Viewers and their Socio-demographic Profile. Survey Researchers do not give analysis of the Content of the Talk Shows frequently watched by the Audience. Here we are providing an innovation in Media research by statistically analyzing the content of TV talk Shows which are amongst the highly watched Programs in Pakistan. The analysis is done to explore the hypothesis: Do all stakeholders especially representatives of all political parties get equal or due chance to express their views in the talk shows? The question holds particular importance given the current political flux in Pakistan. It is a most important time in conveying political parties message through press and media especially TV talk shows. Having seen some of the recent programs we have felt there is an urgent need for party spokesperson/ representatives who are extremely professional in public speaking and can clearly highlight party agenda to general public. We have made a list of all the programs that belong to the Genre under study i.e. Current affairs/talk Shows shown on 5 Television Channels. From this list we have selected 8 Programs. Below is the Statistical Analysis based on monitoring of these 8 TV TALK SHOWS shown on 5 TV Channels. We monitored these Programs during August, 2014. A total of 83 Episodes were monitored in this period. The list of programs and their relative share in our analysis is given below: NUMBER (N) Capital Talk 22 27% Tonight with Jasmeen 17 20% Off the Record 7 8% % Program Aapas Ki Baat 9 11% Sawal Ye Hai 5 6% To the Point 7 8% Meray Mutabiq 6 7% News Hour 10 12% Total 83 100% This is obviously a result of what was chosen to be monitored by the Research Team. [ 3 ]

How the Analysis is done? This analysis of the monitored Programs is in terms of four broad components i.e. who (host and participants) said what (topics) in how much time and how (characteristics of host)? Each of these components is explained below: WHO? This lists and analyzes the participants of each program. We have categorized the participants into different profiles e/g. Politicians, Analysts, Journalists, Subject Experts, Civil Society-NGOs representatives, Serving and Retired Civil-Military Officers etc. WHAT? This tells us the topic of discussion in each program. Again, the topics have been categorized into main topics and subtopics e.g. Domestic and International Politics, Society, Business etc. The Subtopics list the specific issue under discussion e.g. Floods, Budget, Terrorism and other specific socio-political debates. HOW MUCH TIME? This tells us about the time each participant and host got to express their opinions in the program. HOW THE HOST CONDUCTED THE PROGRAM? This tells us about how the host conducted the program, was he/she impartial, did he/she conducted the discussion in a pleasant manner etc. [ 4 ]

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A total of 83 Episodes of 8 TV Talk Shows on 5 Television Channels were monitored for approximately 4 Weeks from August 1 st, 2014 to August 31 st, 2014. Our Quantitative Analysis to explore the hypothesis, Do all stakeholders, especially representatives of all political parties, get equal or due chance to express their views in the talk shows? using the framework who (host and participants) said what (topics) in how much time and how (characteristics of host)? shows following salient features: WHO? A total of 302 Guests participated in the programs. The majority (68%) were Politicians followed by Academics (16%) and Media persons (9%). Among the politicians share of the major political parties was PML-N (36%), PTI (19%) and PPP (17%). Among the Hosts in our monitored programs over the specified period, Hamid Mir had the largest share (27%), followed by Jasmeen Manzoor (20%), Meher Abbasi (12%) and Muneeb Farooq (11%). Please note that this depends on the number of time the program of each of these hosts is shown in a Week. WHAT? Among the topics discussed on Talk shows, Politics dominates (71%) followed by Law (15%). Other subjects such as Economy (2%), Governance (4%) and Security (3%) got low share. Within politics, the major share is of discussion revolved around Azadi March and Inqilab March and the consequent sit-in in Islamabad (37%) followed by Imran Khan/PTI agenda (19%) and Imran Khan and Tahirul Qadri s demands for PM resignation (10%). Among law- related issues, the most common discussion was on electoral reforms covering 65% of total followed by FIR Model Town Incident (13%). HOW MUCH TIME? The total air time of the 83 talk shows was 3,659 minutes with share of guests as 2,190 minutes (63%) and host as 1,264 minutes (37%). The average talk time of the shows was 41 minutes with average guest and host time as 26 minutes and 15 minutes respectively. Politicians shared 65% of the total air time among all guests followed by academic persons having 19% share among the guests time. PML-N got the highest air time as their representatives had 36% of the total air time of guests. PPP with 17% of the air time closely followed PTI which grabbed 19% of the talk time among all guests. [ 5 ]

HOW THE HOST CONDUCTED THE PROGRAM? Overall the hosts and programs seemed unbiased except shows of Jasmeen Manzoor who had some biased discussion towards some specific political parties. Overall 64% of the shows were peaceful whereas 43% shows of Kashif Abbassi and Shahzaib Khanzada had disordered discussions. Please note that these findings could be subjective depending on the perception of the researcher. [ 6 ]

SECTION 1: WHO? [ 7 ]

WHO CONDUCTED THE PROGRAMS? Name of Host Table 1: Share of hosts in the monitored programs 1 TV channel on which program aired Share % Jasmeen Manzoor Ab tak News 20% Kashif Abbasi ARY News 8% Maria Memon Geo News 7% Meher Abbasi Dawn News 12% Muneeb Farooq Geo News 11% Shahzaib Khanzada Express News 8% Dr.Danish ARY News 6% Hamid Mir Geo News 27% Figure 1: Share of channels in monitored TV talk shows 20% Abb Takk 45% ARY News 14% Dawn News Express News Geo News 8% 12% Hamid Mir of Geo News got the highest share (27%) in hosting the talk shows during August 2014 followed by Jasmeen Manzoor (20%). Muneeb Farooq, Meher Abbasi and Shahzaib Khanzada were also among the top 5 hosts in terms of total number of programs monitored. 1 This depends on the number of time the Program of each of these hosts is shown in a Week. [ 8 ]

WHO PARTICIPATED IN THE PROGRAMS? TYPES OF GUEST SPEAKERS IN THE PROGRAMS A total of 302 Guests appeared in these Programs during the Study Period. The Distribution of type of Guest Speaker is as follows: (More than one Guest might participate in one Program and one guest might participate in more than one program) Figure 2: Type of guest speakers who participated in TV talk shows (N=302) 16% 5% 9% Media Persons 2% (Anchor/Expert/Journalist) Military Person (Army, Ranger, Air Force, Police, Elite Force) Politician Academics (Professors, Defense analysts, senior analysts) Judiciary (Judge/ Lawyers) 68% A total of 302 Guests participated in the programs. The majority (68%) were politicians followed by Academics (Professors, Defence Analysts, Senior Analysts) (16%) and Media related guests including Anchors/Experts/Journalists (9%). Military& Civil Officials and Judiciary representatives got the lowest shares as 2% and 5% respectively. A complete List of Guests and the number of times they appeared on these Programs during the Study Period can be provided on request. [ 9 ]

Among the Politicians (n=204), the break up by Political Party 2 is as follows: Figure 3: Type of guest speakers segmented among politicians 3% 3% 6% PML-N 8% 4% 4% 36% PTI PPP PAT MQM PML-Q 17% 19% ANP JI Others Pakistan Muslim League (N) (36%) got the highest share among guest speaker categories followed by Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf (19%) and Pakistan People s Party- Parliamentarian (17%). PAT had 8% of shares followed by MQM & PML-Q (4% each). ANP and JI were the 7 th most invited parties with 3% (each) share among the politicians. Note: Similarly further details on the Categories of other Guest Speakers mentioned before can be provided. 2 PPPP: Pakistan People s Party Parliamentarians PML-N: Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz) MQM: Mutaheda Qoumi Movement PTI: Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf PML-Q: Pakistan Muslim League (Quaid-e-Azam) ANP: Awami National Party TMQ: Tehreek Minhaj ul Quran PML-HK: Pakistan Muslim League (Hum Kheyal) JUI-F: Jamiat Ulma Islam (Fazal ur Rehman) [ 10 ]

SECTION 2: WHAT? [ 11 ]

WHAT TOPIC WAS DISCUSSED? DISTRIBUTION OF TOPICS DISCUSSED IN THESE PROGRAMS DURING STUDY PERIOD Broadly speaking, more than 6 different topics were discussed in 83 programs. The topics discussed in these programs can be broadly classified as follows: Figure 4: Type of topics discussed in TV talk shows Media 1% Economy 2% Security 3% Miscellaneous 3% Governance 4% Law 15% Politics 71% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% * : Multiple response question therefore sum of percentages may exceed 100 Among the topics discussed on Talk Shows, Politics dominates (71%) followed by Law (15%). Economy and Media got the lowest shares. [ 12 ]

Within each Topic Category, there are many sub-topics that were discussed. Their relative distribution is as follows: Sub topics for Politics are given below: Figure 5: Type of topics discussed segmented under Politics Others 14% PTI/PAT negotiation with Government Role of opposition leaders, government & army to end Long March Tahir-Ul-Qadri agenda/demands's for Inqilaab March Imran Khan & Tahir-Ul-Qadri demand for PM resignation 6% 7% 8% 10% Irman Khan Agenda/demand's for Azadi March 19% Azadi & Inqilab March/ Sit-In 37% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% * : Multiple response question therefore sum of percentages may exceed 100 Politics: Among the sub topics under the category of Politics discussed on Talk shows, Azadi & Inqilab March/Sit-in (37%) dominates significantly followed by Imran Khan Agenda / demands (19%) and Imran Khan & Tahir Ul Qadri s demand for PM resignation (10%). [ 13 ]

Similarly from topics that were related to Law, the distribution of sub topics is as follows: Figure 6: Type of topics discussed segmented under Law Implementation of Article 245 4% SC ordered government, to remove containers on D chowk 9% Parliament following constitution or not 9% FIR Model Town Incident 13% Electoral Reform & Formation of Judicial Commission 65% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% * : Multiple response question therefore sum of percentages may exceed 100 65% share of Law category is mostly attributed towards Electoral Reform & Formation of Judicial Commission followed by FIR of Model Town Incident (13%). [ 14 ]

SECTION 3: HOW MUCH TIME? [ 15 ]

HOW MUCH TIME DO HOST AND PARTICIPANTS GET TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS? A: DISTRIBUTION BETWEEN HOST AND GUESTS A total airtime of 3,659 minutes or approximately 61 hours for 83 programs were monitored during the study period. Share among host and participants was: Figure 7: Time distribution between guests and hosts 63% 37% Host air time Guests airtime [ 16 ]

Name of the Host Content Analysis of Television Talk Shows Does the distribution vary by Host? Figure 8: Time distribution by hosts Proportion of Guests Proportion of Hosts Meher Abbasi 59% 41% Hamid Mir 59% 41% Jasmeen Manzoor 61% 39% Muneeb Farooq 63% 37% Dr.Danish 66% 34% Shahzaib Khanzada 68% 32% Kashif Abbasi 76% 24% *Maria Memon 89% 11% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Proportion of time * Program format is different from the other monitored program. Among the hosts, Hamid Mir and Meher Abbasi took little more time to speak than other hosts. On average they took 41% (each) of his program duration to speak. Jasmeen Manzoor took 39% of total program duration followed by Muneeb Farooq with 37%. Although the figure is showing that Maria Memon is the most time giving host but her program format is different from the other programs therefore we can say that Kashif Abbasi is the most time giving host with 76% of his program s duration given to the guests followed by Shahzaib Khanzada with 68% and Dr. Danish (66%). [ 17 ]

Name of the Host Name of the Host Content Analysis of Television Talk Shows Does the distribution vary by Gender of Host? Figure 9: Time distribution by hosts - Male Proportion of Guests Proportion of Hosts Hamid Mir 59% 41% Muneeb Farooq 63% 37% Dr.Danish 66% 34% Shahzaib Khanzada 68% 32% Kashif Abbasi 76% 24% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Proportion of time Figure 10: Time distribution by hosts - Female Proportion of Guests Proportion of Hosts Meher Abbasi 58% 42% Jasmeen Manzoor 61% 39% *Maria Memon 89% 11% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Proportion of time Exploring time distribution of talk shows between host and guests by gender of host showed that there is no significant difference among male and female hosts about time distribution [ 18 ]

between host and gusts. Keeping the different formats of shows in mind, Maria Memon in Mere Mutabiq actively participated in the programs as he just took 11% of his program time for participation by guest speakers. B. DISTRIBUTION BETWEEN THE GUESTS: The total time shared by guest speakers was 2190 minutes during 83 episodes of August 2014. Among the Guests, time share between politicians and other analysts was as follows: Figure 11: Time distribution by guests type 8% 5% 1% 1% Politician 19% Academics (Professors, Defense analysts, senior analysts) Media Persons (Anchor/Expert/Journalist) Judiciary (Judge/ Lawyers) 65% Military Person (Army, Ranger, Air Force, Police, Elite Force) Different occupation Persons The total time grabbed by Politicians was 1428 minutes which makes their total participation in talk shows time of 65%. The Academics (Professors, Defense analysts, senior analysts) followed with 19% share in the total air time allocated to guests. [ 19 ]

Political parties Content Analysis of Television Talk Shows C. DISTRIBUTION BETWEEN POLITICAL PARTIES: The politicians airtime for talk shows was 1428 minutes. Within politicians, share of time by different parties was as follows: Figure 12: Time distribution by political parties 3 Others 64 Awami Muslim League Jamaat-e-Islami Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (F) Awami National Party 23 23 26 35 Muttahida Quami Movement 39 Pakistan Muslim League (Q) 59 Pakistan Awami Tehrik (PAT) 90 Pakistan Peoples Party Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf 240 257 Pakistan Muslim League (N) 572 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Time share in minutes The top 3 political parties whose representatives took the major chunk of 75% of the total air time allocated to politicians were PML-N, PTI and PPP. The highest share was of PML-N which being the ruling party dominated most of the discussions during the study period. 3 PPPP: Pakistan Peoples Party Parliamentarians PML-N: Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz) MQM: Mutaheda Qoumi Movement PTI: Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf PML-Q: Pakistan Muslim League (Quaid-e-Azam) ANP: Awami National Party TMQ: Tehreek Minhaj ul Quran PML-HK: Pakistan Muslim League (Hum Kheyal) JUI-F: Jamiat Ulma Islam (Fazal ur Rehman) [ 20 ]

SECTION 4: HOW WAS THE PROGRAM CONDUCTED? [ 21 ]

HOW DID THE HOST CONDUCT THE PROGRAM? A. MODE OF GUEST APPEARANCE IN THE PROGRAM: Figure 13: Mode of Guest Participation 38% Guests present in studio 62% Guests participated through phone During the month of August, there was a mixture of mode of appearences of guests on TV talk shows. The majority which constitutes 62% of the total were guests who were present in the studio during the talk show. The remaining 38% were guests who contributed to the discussion via phone/videophone conversations. [ 22 ]

B. HOST CHARACTERISTICS: WAS THE HOST BIASED TOWARDS ANY SPECIFIC GUEST/PARTY? Table 2: Characteristic of hosts (Biased or Non-biased) All Talk Shows Yes Was Host Biased? No Count Column N % Count Row N % Count Row N % All Talk Shows Host 83 100 18 22% 65 78% Jasmeen Manzoor 17 20% 4 24% 13 76% Kashif Abbasi 7 8% 3 43% 4 57% Maria Memon 6 7% 0 0% 6 100% Meher Abbasi 10 12% 0 0% 10 100% Muneeb Farooq 9 11% 0 0% 9 100% Shahzaib Khanzada 7 8% 0 0% 7 100% Dr.Danish 5 6% 4 80% 1 20% Hamid Mir 22 27% 7 32% 15 68% Although overall shows run with very little bias with only 22% hosts showing some form of inclination towards a topic, participant or political party. There seemed some kind of biasness towards specific political parties in the shows hosted by Hamid Mir. [ 23 ]

C. HOST CHARACTERISTICS: DID THE HOST TRY TO RECONCILIATE AMONG PARTICIPANTS? Table 3: Characteristic of hosts (Trying to reconcile) Did the Host try to Reconcile? All Talk Shows Yes, He/She did when needed No, He/She didn't even when needed There was peaceful discussion Count Column Row N Row N Count Count N % % % Count Row N % All Talk Shows Host 83 100 11 13% 19 23% 53 64% Jasmeen Manzoor 17 20% 5 29% 4 24% 8 47% Kashif Abbasi 7 8% 1 14% 3 43% 3 43% Maria Memon 6 7% 0 0% 0 0% 6 100% Meher Abbasi 10 12% 1 10% 4 40% 5 50% Muneeb Farooq 9 11% 2 22% 1 11% 6 67% Shahzaib Khanzada 7 8% 2 29% 3 43% 2 29% Dr.Danish 5 6% 0 0% 0 0% 5 100% Hamid Mir 22 27% 0 0% 4 18% 18 82% Almost two third of the monitored programs in the month of August had peaceful discussions (64%) but it seemed that Kashif Abbasi and Shahzeb Khanzada made less efforts to reconcile between the guest speakers and hence their discussions were not very peaceful. [ 24 ]

D. HOST CHARACTERISTICS: DID THE HOST WRAP UP DISCUSSION WITH CONCLUSIONS? Table 4: Characteristic of hosts (Wrapped up the program with conclusions) All Talk Shows Count Column N % Count Yes Did the Host Conclude? Row N % No Count Row N % All Talk Shows Host 83 100 43 52% 40 48% Jasmeen Manzoor 17 20% 5 29% 12 71% Kashif Abbasi 7 8% 1 14% 6 86% Maria Memon 6 7% 3 50% 3 50% Meher Abbasi 10 12% 5 50% 5 50% Muneeb Farooq 9 11% 5 56% 4 44% Shahzaib Khanzada 7 8% 1 14% 6 86% Dr.Danish 5 6% 5 100% 0 0% Hamid Mir 22 27% 18 82% 4 18% The way the hosts wrapped up their shows were almost equally divided between those with conclusions and without conclusions. 52% did summarize the discussion while 48% concluded the show very abruptly. Only Dr. Danish conducting the show Meray Mutabiq gave summary and concluding remarks in every one of his shows. [ 25 ]

METHODOLOGY WHAT ARE WE OFFERING? Methodology: This Report states a new Methodology of analyzing the most popular Television Programs in terms of their Content e.g. if we talk of Current Affairs Programs and take them as a Genre of Programs then How to know that how many different Programs are being shown of this Genre(Current Affairs) on various Television Channels? What these Programs are about i.e. what topics they cover? Who participates in these Programs as analysts, and who hosts these Programs? How the time is distributed among the different types of analysts? Do all political parties get their share? HOW DO WE ANALYZE THE CONTENT? Please Note: We have presented this method by taking Current Affairs/ Talk Shows Programs as a Genre of Programs since they are amongst highly watched Programs in the Country. We have made a list of all the programs that belong to the Genre under study i.e. Current Affairs/ Talk Shows shown on a list of 6 Television Channels in Pakistan. This gives us a comprehensive list of 11 Programs.Please note that this list has been prepared in consultation with Experts in this field. Each New Episode of all these Programs (one or more times every week) is recorded and analyzed in detail according to the following format: A Researcher watches the recorded program and records the following features of the program using a structured questionnaire. This analysis is in terms of four broad components i.e. who said what, in how much time and how? Each of these components is explained below: WHO?This lists and analyzes the participants of each program. We have categorized the participants into different profiles e/g. Politicians, Analysts, Journalists, Subject Experts, Civil Society-NGOs representatives, Serving and Retired Civil-Military Officers etc. [ 26 ]

WHAT? This tells us the topic of discussion in each program. Again, the topics have been categorized into main topics and subtopics e.g. Domestic and International Politics, Society, Business etc. The Subtopics list the specific issue under discussion e.g. Floods, Budget, Terrorism and other specific socio-political debates. HOW MUCH TIME? This tells us about the time each participant and host got to express their opinions in the program. HOW THE HOST CONDUCTED THE PROGRAM? This tells us about how the host conducted the program, was he/she impartial, did he/she conducted the discussion in a pleasant manner etc. HOW CAN CONTENT ANALYSIS BE USEFUL? This analysis tells us: 1. Which Topics have been discussed over past few weeks or months? This gives the trends based on the political/ social circumstances? 2. What is the mix of Analysts in these Programs, are they the politicians, Journalists, Subject Experts, Civil Society-NGOs representatives, or Serving and Retired Civil-Military Officers etc? 3. Which political parties are getting a chance to express their opinions? 4. Is there a just allocation of time to all political parties? 5. How good is the host in conducting the discussion? This in depth analysis can be very useful for Media Professionals, Social Scientists, Anthropologists, Political analysts, Journalists etc. [ 27 ]

Contact Details: Ms. Saima Adnan Deputy General Manager Customized Research Division GallupPakistanKarachi saima.adnan@gallup.com.pk Karachi:+92 213 4537569 Lahore:+92 423 5916635 Islamabad:+92 51 2655630 Fax:+92 51 2655632 Email: isb@gallup.com.pk Disclaimer:GallupPakistan is not related to Gallup Inc. headquartered in WashingtonD.C.USA. We require that our surveys be credited fully as GallupPakistan (not Gallup or Gallup Poll). We disclaim any responsibility for surveys pertaining to Pakistani public opinion except those carried out by GallupPakistan, the Pakistani affiliate of Gallup International Association. For details on Gallup International Association see website: www.gallup-international.com [ 28 ]