Hague System The Hague System for the International Registration of Industrial Designs

Similar documents
Hague Guide for Users

Guide to WIPO Services

The Madrid Agreement Concerning. the International Registration of Marks. and the Protocol Relating to that Agreement:

ACCESSION KIT: THE MADRID SYSTEM FOR THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS

Guide to the International Registration of Marks under the Madrid Agreement and the Madrid Protocol

HAGUE AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS HOW TO FILE AN INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION CONTENTS

Main Provisions and Benefits of the Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement (2015)

Päivi Lähdesmäki Head of the Legal Section The Hague Registry. Geneva May 18, 2016

The Hague System for the International Registration of Industrial Designs. Jonah Asher Hague Development and Promotion Section The Hague Registry

Special Union for the International Deposit of Industrial Designs (Hague Union)

Hague Act of November 28, 1960

Workshop ECTA-BMM-WIPO-BOIP

Overview of The Hague System

Questions and Answers The Singapore Treaty on the Law of Trademarks (STLT)

Introduction of the Madrid Protocol

WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION

1 OJ L 3, , p. 1

The Hague Agreement Concerning the International Deposit of Industrial Designs of November 6, 1925

HAGUE AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS APPLICATION FOR INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION IMPORTANT

The Hague System for the International Registration of Industrial Designs

COMMON REGULATIONS UNDER THE MADRID AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS AND THE PROTOCOL RELATING TO THAT AGREEMENT

Madrid Agreement and Protocol Concerning the International Registration of Marks

SUMMARIES OF CONVENTIONS, TREATIES AND AGREEMENTS ADMINISTERED BY WIPO I2006

One Hundred Twelfth Congress of the United States of America

WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION

Common Regulations under the Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks and the Protocol Relating to that Agreement

PART B CHAPTER II: THE INTERNATIONAL PROCEDURE INTRODUCTION THE INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION. Substantive Requirements

The Community Design System The Latest Developments in Examination and Invalidity Procedure. By Eva Vyoralová

COMMON REGULATIONS UNDER THE MADRID AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS AND THE PROTOCOL RELATING TO THAT AGREEMENT

STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE LAW OF TRADEMARKS, INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS

AGREEMENT. between the Finnish Patent and Registration Office and the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization

PROTOCOL relating to the Madrid Agreement concerning the international registration of marks, adopted at Madrid on 27 June 1989

Training Module for Chapter 18 of the MPEP. NOTE: The provisions of Chapter 18 have not been changed by the AIA.

NORWAY Designs Regulations Royal Decree of April 4, 2003 Last amendment: July 1, 2010 Updated: February 23, 2011

The Accession of the Russian Federation to the Geneva Act of the Hague Agreement. L.L. Kiriy Deputy Director General, Rospatent

Chapter 1800 Patent Cooperation Treaty

DESIGN PROTECTION AND EXAMINATION EUROPEAN APPROACH FRANCK FOUGERE ANANDA INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LIMITED

GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION OF REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGNS EUROPEAN UNION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (EUIPO) REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGNS

Implementing Regulations of the Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China

C. PCT 1548 November 5, 2018

PROTOCOL RELATING TO THE MADRID AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS

Patent Webinar Series

Special Union for the International Registration of Marks (Madrid Union)

GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION OF INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS A REPORT ON CONSENSUS POINTS FOR EXAMINATION OF INDUSTRIAL DESIGN APPLICATIONS

Administrative Instructions for the Application of the Hague Agreement

WORKSHOP ECTA BMM WIPO BOIP INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF DESIGNS 12 DECEMBER 2011, THE HAGUE

IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS TO THE LAW 84/1998 ON TRADEMARKS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS. CHAPTER I General Provisions

AGREEMENT. (as in force from September 1, 2018)*

1 Introduction The EUIPO as Office of Origin... 4

TITLE II CONCEPT OF A TRADEMARK AND REGISTRATION PROHIBITIONS

Working Group on the Legal Development of the Hague System for the International Registration of Industrial Designs

Madrid Agreement and Protocol Concerning the International Registration of Marks

HAGUE AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS APPLICATION FOR INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION

AGREEMENT. between the Spanish Patent and Trademark Office and the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization

International Registration of Designs 12 December 2011, The Hague

GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE ON REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGNS RENEWAL OF REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGNS

Regulation relating to payments etc. to the Norwegian Industrial Property Office and the Board of Appeal for Industrial Property Rights

AGREEMENT. (as in force from January 1, 2018)*

Madrid Easy. A rough and easy guide how international registrations designating the European Community will be processed by the OHIM

AGREEMENT. (as in force from January 1, 2018)*

TREATY SERIES 2000 Nº 2. Trademark Law Treaty With Regulations and Model Forms

LOCARNO AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING AN INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS

Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks

AGREEMENT. between the National Institute of Industrial Property of Chile and the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization

AGREEMENT. between the Indian Patent Office and the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization

REGISTERED DESIGNS ACT /221

L 172/4 EN Official Journal of the European Union

convention stat e l e ssn e ss

FINLAND Patents Decree No. 669 of September 26, 1980 as last amended by Decree No. 580 of 18 July 2013 Enter into force on 1 September 2013

WIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER

FRAMEWORK PROVISIONS FOR THE DIGITAL ACCESS SERVICE FOR PRIORITY DOCUMENTS 1. established on March 31, 2009 and modified on July 1, 2012

TRADEMARK LAW TREATY adopted at Geneva on October 27, 1994 Entry into force: see Article 20(2).

exclusively in electronic form (no paper notifications will be sent). address: State (that is, country) of nationality:

TURKEY Industrial Design Law Decree-law No. 554 as amended by Law No of November 7, 1995 ENTRY INTO FORCE: November 7, 1995

Ordinance on the Protection of Plant Varieties

SINGAPORE TREATY ON THE LAW OF TRADEMARKS, REGULATIONS UNDER THE SINGAPORE TREATY ON THE LAW OF TRADEMARKS AND RESOLUTION BY THE DIPLOMATIC

AGREEMENT. (as in force from January 1, 2018)*

Forms: paragraph 31 Positive determination (requirements of Article 11(1) fulfilled): paragraph 49

Singapore Treaty on the Law of Trademarks

TREATY SERIES 2013 Nº 8. WIPO Patent Law Treaty

AGREEMENT. between the European Patent Organisation and the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization

TABLE OF CONTENTS. CHAPTER 1: THIS GUIDE AND ITS ANNEXES Introduction CHAPTER 2: WHAT IS THE PCT?

Regulations for the Implementation of Trademark Law (2010)

PLT/A/2/2 Annex, page 33. Further applications and/or patents concerned are indicated on additional sheet No...

Agreement. (as in force from July 1, 2012)*

WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION GENEVA DIPLOMATIC CONFERENCE FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE PATENT LAW TREATY. Geneva, May 11 to June 2, 2000

THE TRADE MARKS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2009

PCT/GL/ISPE/1 Page 194 PART VIII CLERICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES. Chapter 22 Clerical and Administrative Procedures

GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) ON COMMUNITY TRADE MARKS PART D

Trademark Law Treaty

GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION OF EUROPEAN UNION TRADE MARKS EUROPEAN UNION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (EUIPO) PART E REGISTER OPERATIONS SECTION 2

Guidelines Concerning Proceedings before the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) Part B, Examination

General Information Concerning. of IndusTRIal designs

Internal Process for Substantive Examination of International Registrations and National Applications. March 2016 Design Division Japan Patent Office

Editorial and minor drafting changes are not mentioned here.

WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION GENEVA PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) ADMINISTRATIVE INSTRUCTIONS UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY

REPUBLIC OF GEORGIA LAW ON TRADEMARKS

Unitary Patent Guide. Obtaining, maintaining and managing Unitary Patents

Summary and Conclusions

GENEVA INTERNATIONAL PATENT COOPERATION UNION (PCT UNION) ASSEMBLY. Thirty-Second (14 th Ordinary) Session Geneva, September 22 to October 1, 2003

Transcription:

The Hague System for the International Registration of Industrial Designs Main Features and Advantages A

Contents Introduction 3 Who May Use the Hague System? 4 Where Can Protection Be Obtained? 4 The International Application 5 Filing the International Application 7 What Are the Effects of the International Registration? 10 Duration of Protection 10 Changes in the International Register 11 What Are the Advantages of Using the Hague System? 11 Further Information About the Hague System 12 1

Introduction 1. The Hague Agreement provides a mechanism for acquiring, maintaining and managing design rights in countries and intergovernmental organizations that are members of the Hague Union through a single international application filed with the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) that results in a single international registration with individual effect in each of the Contracting Parties (States or intergovernmental organizations) designated therein. 2. Thus, the Hague Agreement allows users to save time and money by enabling them to easily and swiftly acquire design protection in multiple markets, as a single international application replaces a whole series of applications which, otherwise, should have been effected with different national (or regional) Offices. 3. The Hague Agreement is constituted by two international treaties: The Geneva Act of July 2, 1999 (the 1999 Act ); The Hague Act of November 28, 1960 (the 1960 Act ). 4. The 1999 and the 1960 Acts of the Hague Agreement are autonomous and totally independent of each other. In recent years, membership to the 1999 Act has overtaken that of the 1960 Act (a list of the Contracting Parties, together with an indication of the respective dates on which they became bound by the 1999 Act or the 1960 Act is available on the WIPO website (www.wipo.int/hague/en)). 3

Who May Use the Hague System? 5. The possibility of filing an international application under the Hague Agreement is not open to everyone. To be entitled to file such an application, an applicant must satisfy at least one of the following conditions: a. be a national of a Contracting Party or a member State of an intergovernmental organization which is a Contracting Party, such as the European Union or the African Intellectual Property Organization, or b. have a domicile in the territory of a Contracting Party, or c. have a real and effective industrial or commercial establishment in the territory of a Contracting Party. 6. In addition, but only under the 1999 Act, an international application may be filed on the basis of habitual residence in a Contracting Party. 7. The Contracting Party with respect to which the applicant fulfils the above condition is referred to as the State of origin under the 1960 Act and the applicant s Contracting Party under the 1999 Act. Where Can Protection Be Obtained? 8. Protection can be obtained only in those Contracting Parties which are party to the same Act as the Contracting Party through which the applicant has the necessary entitlement (i.e., nationality, domicile, habitual residence or establishment). For example, if an applicant has claimed entitlement through a Contracting Party bound exclusively by the 1999 Act, he may request protection in those Contracting Parties which are bound by the 1999 Act (whether or not they are also bound by the 1960 Act). On the other hand, such applicant is not entitled to request protection in respect of Contracting Parties bound only by the 1960 Act. 9. The Hague System cannot be used to protect an industrial design in a country which is not party to the Hague Agreement, or which is not a member State of an intergovernmental organization party to the Hague Agreement. In order to protect a design in such a country, the applicant has no choice but to file a national (or regional) application. 4

10. If an intergovernmental organization party to the Hague Agreement is designated in an international application, the protection covers the territories of all its member States. The International Application Standard Contents of the Application 11. The international application must be filed in English, French or Spanish (at the applicant s option) and electronically through the electronic filing interface (E-filing) available on the WIPO website (wipo.int/hague/en) or on the official form (available on the WIPO website). No prior national or regional application or registration is required. 12. An international application may include up to 100 different designs. All designs must, however, belong to the same class of the International Classification for Industrial Designs (the Locarno Classification). 13. It must, in particular, contain a reproduction of the industrial designs concerned, together with the designation of the Contracting Parties where protection is sought. 14. The applicant may request that publication of the designs be deferred for a period which cannot exceed 12 months (under the 1960 Act) or 30 months (under the 1999 Act) from the filing date or, where priority is claimed, from the priority date. 15. An international application is subject to the payment of three types of fees (in Swiss francs), namely: a basic fee; a publication fee; for each designated Contracting Party, either a standard fee or an individual fee. 16. A schedule of fees, as well as an automatic fee calculator, is available on the WIPO website (www.wipo.int/hague/en/fees). 5

Specific Contents Required by Certain Contracting Parties and Information Relevant to Each of Contracting Parties 17. The declarations made by certain Contracting Parties to the 1999 Act may also have an impact on the elements included and choices made in an international application that designates them. At times, considerations relating to their substantive law may also need to be borne in mind. 18. When using the E-filing interface to file an international application, users will be automatically informed by the System of the specific requirements set by a given designated Contracting Party. Alternatively, the following links may prove useful: Member Pages These give access to the list of declarations made by each Contracting Party to the Hague System and certain information concerning their national/regional procedures (http://www.wipo.int/hague/en/members/index.html) Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) To get more specific information on the designation of Contracting Parties (http://www.wipo.int/hague/en/faqs.html) Guidance on Preparing and Providing Reproductions in Order to Forestall Possible Refusals on the Ground of Insufficient Disclosure of an Industrial Design by Examining Offices To prepare reproductions of the design in view of the designation of certain Contracting Parties (http://www.wipo.int/export/ sites/www/hague/en/how_to/pdf/guidance.pdf) 6

Filing the International Application 19. The E-filing interface on WIPO s website will remind applicants to take into account the following considerations. 20. Direct or Indirect filing: a. Direct filing with the International Bureau: the applicant is recommended to check if the law of the applicant s Contracting Party requires security clearance procedures to be carried by national Office, which can entail indirect filing; b. Indirect filing (through the Office of the applicant s Contracting Party): Indirect filing is admitted, if the applicant s Contracting Party has not notified the International Bureau that international applications may not be filed through its Office; If indirect filing is allowed, the Office of a Contracting Party may require that the applicant pay a transmittal fee to it, for its own benefit, in respect of any international application filed through it. 21. In the case of direct filing, the international application may be filed, at the option of the applicant, either online (E-filing) or on paper: a. E-filing is easier, cheaper and faster method to file international application thanks to its simplicity and modern features. A specially developed E-filing tutorial is designed to assist the applicant to use the E-filing Portfolio Manager (www.wipo.int/hague/en/how_to/efiling _tutorial/index.html); b. In case of paper application, the applicant shall fill in the application form (www.wipo.int/hague/en/forms) and send it by mail or by facsimile. Submission by email is not accepted. 7

Formal Examination by the International Bureau 22. Upon receipt of an international application, the International Bureau checks that it complies with the prescribed formal requirements, such as those relating to the quality of the reproductions of the industrial designs and the payment of the required fees. The applicant is informed of any defects, which must be corrected within the prescribed time limit of three months, failing which the international application is considered abandoned. 23. Where an international application complies with the prescribed formal requirements, the International Bureau proceeds with its recording in the International Register and with the publication of the corresponding registration in the International Designs Bulletin. The publication takes place six months after the international registration date, unless the applicant requested immediate publication or deferment of publication in the international application. The publication takes place electronically on the WIPO website and contains all relevant data concerning the international registration, including a reproduction of the industrial design. 24. The International Bureau does not appraise or concern itself in any way with the novelty of the design and it is therefore not entitled to reject an international application on this, or any other, substantive ground (substantive examination falls within the exclusive competence of the Office of each designated Contracting Party). 8

Substantive Examination by the Office of Each Designated Contracting Party: Possibility of Notifying a Refusal of Protection 25. Upon publication of the Bulletin on the WIPO website, each Office must identify the international registrations in which it has been designated, in order to proceed with the substantive examination provided by its domestic legislation, if any. In fact, one of the main features of the Hague System lies in the possibility for the Office of each designated Contracting Party to refuse protection, in its territory, to an industrial design which does not fulfil the substantive conditions of protection provided for by its domestic legislation. Such refusal, however, may not be issued on the grounds of non-compliance with formal requirements, since such requirements are to be considered as already been satisfied following the examination carried out by the International Bureau. 26. Any refusal of protection must be notified to the International Bureau within six months from the publication of the international registration on the WIPO website. Under the 1999 Act, however, any Contracting Party whose Office is an Examining Office, or whose law provides for the possibility of opposition, may declare that the refusal period of six months is replaced by a period of 12 months. Any refusal of protection shall have effect only throughout the territory of the Contracting Party whose Office has issued such a refusal. 27. In the event of a refusal, the applicant has the same remedies as he would have had if he had filed the design in question directly with the Office which has issued the refusal. The ensuing procedure takes place solely at the national level; an appeal against a refusal must be submitted by the holder to the competent authority of the country concerned, within the time-limit and in accordance with the conditions set out in the corresponding domestic legislation. The International Bureau is not involved in such procedure. 28. A refusal may be withdrawn, totally or partially. Such a withdrawal may also take the form of a statement to the effect that protection is granted to the industrial designs, or some of the industrial designs, that are the subject of the international registration. 9

29. On the other hand, where an Office finds no grounds for refusing protection, it may, before the expiry of the applicable refusal period, issue a statement of grant of protection. What Are the Effects of the International Registration? 30. If no refusal is notified by a given designated Contracting Party within the prescribed time limit (or if such refusal has subsequently been withdrawn), the international registration has the effect as a grant of protection in that Contracting Party, under the law of that Contracting Party. 31. It must therefore be stressed that the Hague System is merely an agreement for international procedure. Any substantive aspect of the protection is entirely a matter for the domestic legislation of each designated Contracting Party. Duration of Protection 32. International registrations are affected for an initial period of five years. They may be renewed for an additional period of five years. In respect of each designated Contracting Party, the minimum duration of protection shall be at least 15 years, subject to renewal, and up to the expiry of the total term of protection allowed by those Contracting Parties respective laws. 33. Requests for renewals must be presented to the International Bureau, along with the payment of the corresponding renewal fees. International registrations may be renewed electronically through the electronic renewal interface (E-renewal) available on the WIPO website (www.wipo.int/hague/en). Renewals may be made for all or some of the industrial designs included in the international registration and for all or some of the designated Contracting Parties. 10

Changes in the International Register 34. The following changes, which may affect an international registration, may be recorded in the International Register: a. change in name and address of the holder; b. change in the ownership of the international registration (in respect of all or some of the designated Contracting Parties and/or in respect of all or some of the industrial designs); c. renunciation of all the industrial designs, in respect of any or all of the designated Contracting Parties; and d. limitation of some only of the industrial designs, in respect of any or all of the designated Contracting Parties. 35. A request for the recording of such changes must be presented to the International Bureau on the relevant official form and must be accompanied by the prescribed fees. Information concerning such changes is recorded in the International Register and is published in the Bulletin for the information of third parties. What Are the Advantages of Using the Hague System? 36. The Hague System for the International Registration of Industrial Designs arose from a need for simplicity and economy. In effect, it enables design owners from a Contracting Party to obtain protection for their designs with a minimum of formalities and expense. In particular, they are relieved of the need to make a separate national application in each of the Contracting Parties, in which they seek protection, thus avoiding the complications arising from procedures and languages which differ from one State to another. 37. The Hague System also avoids the need for constant monitoring of the deadline for renewal of a whole series of national registrations, varying from one State to the other. In addition, it avoids the need to pay a series of fees in various currencies. 11

38. In effect, under the Hague Agreement, by means of a single international application, made in one language, on payment of a single set of fees, in one currency (Swiss francs) and with one Office (the International Bureau), the applicant receives a bundle of national rights. 39. Moreover, by having a single international registration with effect in several Contracting Parties, the subsequent management of the international registration is considerably facilitated. For instance, a change in the name or address of the holder, or a change in ownership for only some or all of the designated Contracting Parties, can be recorded in the International Register and have effect by means of one simple procedural step carried out through the International Bureau. Further Information about the Hague System 40. Additional information and tools concerning the Hague System for the International Registration of Industrial Designs are available on the WIPO website (www.wipo.int/hague/en/). 12

World Intellectual Property Organization 34, chemin des Colombettes P.O. Box 18 CH-1211 Geneva 20 Switzerland Tel: + 41 22 338 91 11 Fax: + 41 22 733 54 28 For contact details of WIPO s External Offices visit: www.wipo.int/about-wipo/en/offices/ WIPO, 2017 Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) The CC license does not apply to non-wipo content in this publication. WIPO Publication No. 911E ISBN 978-92-805-2852-7