63rd District Court 1950 East Beltline Avenue, Grand Rapids, MI Phone: (616) Fax: (616)

Similar documents
17th Circuit Court Kent County Courthouse 180 Ottawa Avenue NW, Grand Rapids, MI Phone: (616) Fax: (616)

ELIGIBILITY AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR SEALING OF CRIMINAL RECORDS Based upon Ohio Revised Code

Courtroom Terminology

Have you ever been a victim or a witness to a crime? If so, you may be entitled to certain rights under Louisiana's Crime Victim Bill of Rights.

Circuit Court Office Manager

The Administrative Office of the Courts: Overview. William Childs Fiscal Research Division

Determining Eligibility for Expungements & Penal Code 17(B) Reductions. Expungements and Prop 47 Clinic Training Training Module 1

CRIMINAL & TRAFFIC DIVISION COST SCHEDULE

Legal Definitions: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z A

6/13/2016. Second Chances Setting Aside a Juvenile Adjudication. Why Expunge an Adjudication (aren t juvenile records sealed)?

2012 Judicial Conference. Swift and Sure Sanctions Pilot Program (SSSP)

Criminal Justice Public Safety and Individual Rights

Victim / Witness Handbook. Table of Contents

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Expungements and Pardons in South Carolina Courts

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS JUVENILE COURT DEPARTMENT

Administration Division Municipal Attorney s Office Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

MUNICIPAL COURT ANNUAL REPORT 2008

CIRCUIT COURT William T. Newman, Jr. FY 2019 Proposed Budget - General Fund Expenditures

36TH DISTRICT COURT OF DETROIT (60)

District Attorney Accomplishments

IN THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA

5 North Gay Street 3rd Floor Mount Vernon, OH Telephone: (740) Fax: (740) mountvernonmunicipalcourt.

21st Century Summary Court

Maumee Municipal Court Job Description

Assistant County Attorney

MISDEMEANOR SENTENCING STEPS FOR SENTENCING A MISDEMEANOR UNDER STRUCTURED SENTENCING

Assembly Bill No. 25 Committee on Corrections, Parole, and Probation

IMPROVE OVERSIGHT OF THE TEXAS COUNTY JUDGE SALARY SUPPLEMENT

The court process CONSUMER GUIDE. How the criminal justice system works. FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON

Assembly Bill No. 510 Select Committee on Corrections, Parole, and Probation

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Receipts and Expenditures of Civil Division 3. Receipts and Expenditures of Criminal Division 4, 5

Section 1 - Are You Eligible?

HARRIS COUNTY CRIMINAL COURTS AT LAW

IN THE DISTRICT/SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT BARROW , ) ) Defendant. ) DOB: DOV: ) Case No.

An Introduction. to the. Federal Public Defender s Office. for the Districts of. South Dakota and North Dakota

PETITION FOR EXPUNGEMENT OF CONVICTION OR DIVERSION Pursuant to K.S.A

TITLE 3 MUNICIPAL COURT CHAPTER 1 1 TOWN COURT ADMINISTRATION 2

LOCAL RULES OF COURT FOR BRYAN MUNICIPAL COURT

An Introduction to North Carolina s Judicial Branch

Sealing Criminal Records for Convictions, Acquittals, & Dismissals. Expungements in Ohio

46th District Court 2016 Annual Report

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CRIME VICTIMS BILL OF RIGHTS REQUEST TO EXERCISE VICTIMS RIGHTS

If you are applying for a government-issued license, certificate, or permit, you must disclose your conviction and expungement.

Protective Orders No-Trespass/No-Contact Order What happens after a police report is filed? Miscellaneous Criminal Justice Information

Sealing Criminal Records for Convictions, Acquittals, & Dismissals. Expungements in Ohio

Office Of The District Attorney

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 8 CRIMINAL

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 46 1

SENATE BILL NO. 33 IN THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE - FIRST SESSION A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED

PICKENS COUNTY. MISSION The mission of the Clerk of Court is to aid county citizens who are affected by the court system.

OUTLINE OF CRIMINAL COURT PROCESS

Indiana Second Chance Law Expungement and Sealing Manual

Navigating Through the Criminal Justice System in Virginia

COURT RULES 21st JUDICIAL CIRCUIT

Fairfield Municipal Court JOYCE A. CAMPBELL Judge. 675 Nilles Road Fairfield, Ohio Fax

Structure of the Criminal Justice System. Developed by Jo Ann Grode 2004

CAUSE NUMBER 00 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE COUNTY CRIMINAL V. COURT AT LAW NUMBER 00 DEFENDANT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

SENATE BILL NO. 34 IN THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE - FIRST SESSION A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED

Fairfield Municipal Court JOYCE A. CAMPBELL Judge. 675 Nilles Road Fairfield, Ohio Fax

Application for Employment

ALLEGAN COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY

MISSION: Victim Services is dedicated to assisting crime victims with the aftermath of violent crimes and acts as a liaison between victims and the

46th District Court 2017 Annual Report

PART 6 COURT CHAPTER 1 MUNICIPAL COURT

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO ALACHUA COUNTY DRUG COURT

NO. VS. COURT OF TEXAS

89TH DISTRICT COURT Annual Report. Cheboygan County Maria I. Barton District Court Judge. P.O. Box 70 County Building Cheboygan, MI 49721

Michael Gayoso, Jr. Office of the County Attorney TH

FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION DIVISION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT

LITIGATING JUVENILE TRANSFER AND CERTIFICATION CASES IN THE JUVENILE AND CIRCUIT COURTS

The Judicial Branch. SSCG4 The Students will analyze the role of the Judicial Branch in Georgia government. (a, b, c, d)

Stages of a Case Glossary

RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULE 3:21. SENTENCE AND JUDGMENT; WITHDRAWAL OF PLEA; PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION; PROBATION

AN ACT IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Connecticut s Courts

Presentation to The Bail System Task Force on Laws as to Judicial Branch Procedures. December 17, Elizabeth Buckler Veronis Task Force Staff

Elko County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer

Basics of County Government

MARIETTA MUNICIPAL COURT WASHINGTON COUNTY, OHIO ANNUAL REPORT

Criminal Justice Process

Academy District 20 Non-Parent Volunteer Application Form. Process Information for Principals

POLICY AND PROGRAM REPORT

Fairfield Municipal Court JOYCE A. CAMPBELL Judge. 675 Nilles Road Fairfield, Ohio Fax

OVERVIEW OF THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM. Laura Lothman Lambert Director, Juvenile Division

EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION

Age Limits in the Juvenile Justice System, Criminal Violations, Delinquent Conduct and Conduct Indicating a Need for Supervision

CITY OF MCLOUTH, KANSAS

Virginia s Nonviolent Offender Risk Assessment

A Victim s Guide to Understanding the Criminal Justice System

Chapter 1. Crime and Justice in the United States

Promoting Second Chances: HR and Criminal Records

7.1 Case Weighting System

NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE AND OSCEOLA COUNTIES, FLORIDA ORDER GOVERNING VETERANS COURT

Relevant Facts Penal Code Section (aka expungements ) Penal Code Section 17(b), reduction of felonies to misdemeanors Proposition 47 Prop 64

A BILL IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA FIRST APPEARANCE DIVISION

Title 15: COURT PROCEDURE -- CRIMINAL

HARRIS COUNTY CRIMINAL COURTS AT LAW

Amendments to Rules of Criminal Procedure Affecting District Court Procedures

20 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF COLORADO ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER SUBJECT: County Court Reorganization COUNTY COURT MEMORANDUM OF OPERATION

Transcription:

63rd District Court 1950 East Beltline Avenue, Grand Rapids, MI 49525 Phone: (616) 632-7770 Fax: (616) 363-6124 Mission The 63rd District Court is a county funded independent branch of government committed to the prompt, courteous and fair dispensation of justice by adjudicating cases in a timely manner using effective and efficient case management techniques, adhering to the highest standards that maintain the statutory and constitutional rights of all citizens, monitoring the enforcement of judgments, and being responsible stewards of public funds. Overview The 63rd District Court is one of six District Courts in the County, but the only District Court funded by the County of Kent. The other District Courts in Kent County are funded by their respective cities. The District Court is a trial court of limited jurisdiction that has exclusive jurisdiction over the following types of cases: Civil suits involving $25,000 or less; Adult criminal misdemeanor offenses punishable by up to one year s imprisonment; Civil infractions; Traffic violations; Landlord/tenant disputes; Small claims (involving $5,500 or less); and Land contract forfeitures In addition to its jurisdiction to try adult criminal offenses punishable by up to one year s imprisonment, the district court is the court in which all other adult criminal proceedings begin, regardless of the nature of the offense. In carrying out this function, the district court has jurisdiction to issue arrest and search warrants, set bail and accept bond, conduct misdemeanor and felony arraignments, preside over preliminary examinations for felony and misdemeanor offenses outside its trial jurisdiction, and perform civil marriage ceremonies. Strategic Goals Provide excellent customer service and equal access to a system of justice where all persons are treated with dignity and respect, being sensitive and responsive to the needs of our diverse community. (High Quality of Life) Provide responsible stewardship of resources through reasonably necessary expenses, effective collection of fines, costs and assessments, and accurate financial accounting and reporting. (Stable Revenues, Efficient Use of Resources) Provide opportunities for community involvement and public trust through satisfaction surveys, small claims mediations by trained volunteers, classroom visits and job shadowing, and efficient use of jury panels. (Citizen Participation) Provide a safe and informed community through just sentences, sound decisions, reduced offender recidivism, and fair enforcement of court orders. (Safe Community) 63rd District Court facility Significant Accomplishments The Court added a scheduling module to our case management system so that hearings can be scheduled quicker on cases without having to consult a hardcopy calendar for the judges dockets. This should improve customer service and greatly reduce the cost of mailing notices to the parties after their hearings. The Court began implementation of real-time dispositions and distribution of paperwork in the courtroom which will eliminate case processing steps by staff, allow some customers to be checked out in the courtroom, and greatly reduce the wait times for customers that have to return to the front counter after their hearing. 1

DEPARTMENT: 63RD DISTRICT COURT Department Mission Statement: The 63rd District Court is a county funded independent branch of government committed to the prompt, courteous and fair dispensation of justice by adjudicating cases in a timely manner using effective and efficient case management techniques, adhering to the highest standards that maintain the statutory and constitutional rights of all citizens, monitoring the enforcement of judgments, and being responsible stewards of public funds. Service Area: Criminal Division Service Area Mission Statement: Provide excellent customer service and equal access to all persons appearing on all types of criminal cases are treated with dignity and respect, being sensitive and responsive to the needs of our diverse community. Goals Provide excellent customer service to all persons, and treat all criminal defendants with dignity and respect, being sensitive and responsive to the needs of our diverse community. Provide timely processing and adjudication of all criminal cases filed with the Court. Objectives 95% of Misdemeanors to be Adjudicated Within 126 Days of Arraignment. 75% of Preliminary Exams to be Concluded Within 28 days of Arraignment. Outcomes Percentage of Misdemeanor Cases Adjudicated Within 126 Days of Arraignment Percentage of Preliminary Exams Concluded Within 28 days of Arraignment 95.01% 95.00%/ 93.80% 88.26% 75.00%/ 92.00% 95.00%/ 93.40% 75.00%/ 93.50% 95.00% 75.00% Efficiencies Total Criminal Cases Processed Per Clerk (6 FTE) (Pending, New & Reopened) 1,580 1,600/ 1,668 1,650/ 1,757 1,750 2

Outputs Total Criminal Cases Processed (Pending, New & Reopened) Total Felony & Extradition Cases Processed (Pending, New & Reopened) Total Misdemeanor Cases Processed (Pending, New & Reopened) Total Number of New Misdemeanors Adjudicated Within 126 Days of Arraignment Total Number of Preliminary Examinations on Felonies Concluded Within 28 Days of Arraignment 9,482 9,600/ 10,011 1,504 1,500/ 1,570 7,978 8,000/ 8,441 5,146 5,200/ 5,325 654 650/ 704 10,000/ 10,545 1,550/ 1,655 8,400/ 8,890 5,300/ 5,616 700/ 768 10,500 1,700 8,800 5,500 750 3

Service Area: Traffic Division Service Area Mission Statement: Provide excellent customer service and equal access to all persons appearing in civil infraction or parking cases are treated with dignity and respect, being sensitive and responsive to the needs of our diverse community. Goals Provide excellent customer service and equal access to a system of justice where all persons are treated with dignity and respect, being sensitive and responsive to the needs of our diverse community. Provide timely processing and adjudication of all traffic civil infraction and parking cases filed with the Court. Objectives 100% of Abstractable Civil Infractions to be Submitted to the Secretary of State Within 10 Days of Adjudication. 98% of Civil Infraction & Parking Violations to be Adjudicated Within 84 Days of Filing. Outcomes Percentage of Abstractable Civil Infractions Violations Submitted to the Secretary of State Within 10 Days of Adjudication. Percentage of Civil Infraction & Parking Violations Adjudicated Within 84 Days of Filing. 99.41% 100.00%/ 99.40% 98.44% 98.00%/ 98.59% 100.00%/ 99.70% 98.00%/ 97.70% 100.00% 98.00% Efficiencies Total Number of Civil Infraction & Parking Cases (Pending, New & Reopened) Processed Per Traffic Clerk (2 FTE) 7,337 7,500/ 7,954 7,500/ 7,152 7,000 4

Outputs Total New Traffic Civil Infraction Violations Filed Total New Non-Traffic Civil Infractions & Parking Filed Total Number of Civil Infraction & Parking Cases (Pending, New & Reopened) Processed Total Number of Abstracts Submitted to the Secretary of State Total Number of Abstracts Submitted to the Secretary of State within 10 days of Disposition 12,835 13,000/ 13,874 1,126 1,000/ 1,325 14,674 15,000/ 15,908 9,818 10,000/ 10,760 9,760 9,900/ 10,695 13,500/ 12,133 1,250/ 1,321 15,000/ 14,304 10,000/ 10,410 10,000/ 10,374 12,000 1,300 14,000 10,000 10,000 5

Service Area: Civil Division Service Area Mission Statement: Provide excellent customer service and equal access to all persons appearing on all types of civil cases are treated with dignity and respect, being sensitive and responsive to the needs of our diverse community. Goals Provide excellent customer service and equal access to a system of justice where all persons are treated with dignity and respect, being sensitive and responsive to the needs of our diverse community. Provide timely processing and adjudication of all civil cases filed with the Court. Objectives 98% of General Civil Cases to be Adjudicated Within 455 Days of Filing. 65% of Jury Trial Landlord Tenant/Summary Proceedings to be Adjudicated Within 154 Days of Filing 95% of Non-Jury Trial Landlord Tenant/Summary Proceedings to be Adjudicated Within 126 Days of Filing 95% of Small Claims Cases to be Adjudicated Within 126 Days of Filing. Outcomes Percentage of General Civil Cases Adjudicated within 455 days of Filing Percentage of [Jury Trial] Landlord Tenant/Summary Proceedings Adjudicated within 154 Days of Filing Percentage of [Non-Jury] Landlord Tenant/Summary Proceedings Adjudicated within 126 Days of Filing Percentage of Small Claims Proceedings Adjudicated within 126 Days of Filing 99.80% 98.00%/ 99.70% 71.43% 65.00%/ 72.00% 98.20% 95.00%/ 98.20% 96.80% 95.00%/ 91.80% 98.00%/ 99.90% 65.00%/ 85.70% 95.00%/ 98.50% 95.00%/ 90.00% 98.00% 65.00% 95.00% 95.00% 6

Efficiencies Total Civil Cases Processed (Pending, New & Reopened) Per Civil Clerk (5 FTE) 2,107 2,100/ 1,900 2,000/ 1,864 1,900 Outputs Total New General Civil Cases Filed Total New Landlord Tenant & Summary Proceedings Cases Filed Total New Small Claims Cases Filed Total Number of Civil Cases (Pending, New & Re-Opened) Processed (LT/GC/SC/SP) 4,029 4,100/ 3,488 3,135 3,100/ 2,907 1,598 1,600/ 1,491 10,537 10,500/ 9,502 3,800/ 3,498 3,000/ 2,847 1,500/ 1,323 10,000/ 9,321 3,500 2,900 1,400 9,500 7

Service Area: Probation Division Service Area Mission Statement: Ensure offender compliance with the probation orders of our Judges, including administering jail alternatives, assessing and administering referrals to treatment programs and collecting assessments, while still being sensitive and responsive to the needs of our diverse community. Goals Provide excellent customer service and equal access to a system of justice where all persons are treated with dignity and respect, being sensitive and responsive to the needs of our diverse community. Provide supervision to misdemeanor probationers in order to monitor their compliance with court orders, including the effective collection of fines, costs and assessments. Provide a safe and informed community through reduced offender recidivism, and fair enforcement of court orders. Objectives At least 70% of all probationers discharged each year will be successful. At least 75% of OWI probationers discharged each year will be successful. At least 70% of all monies assessed to probationers each year will be collected within one year of assessment. Outcomes Percentage of All Probationers Discharged Successfully (vs. Unsuccessful) Percentage of OWI Probationers Discharged Successfully (vs. Unsuccessful) Percentage of Money Assessed and Collected/Served from Probationers During the Year 71.60% 70.00%/ 68.10% 77.90% 75.00%/ 76.40% 68.77% 70.00%/ 71.80% 70.00%/ 69.00% 75.00%/ 75.50% 70.00%/ 80.40% 70.00% 75.00% 70.00% 8

Efficiencies Total New Probation Cases During Year Per Probation Officer (4 FTE for ; 6 FTE for ) 488 500/ 452 450/ 443 300 Outputs Total Number of Defendants Sentenced to Probation During Year New OWI Probation Cases During Year Total OWI Probationers Discharged During Year (Successful & Unsuccessful) Total OWI Probationers Discharged Successfully During Year Total Money Assessed to Probationers During the Year Total Money Assessed and Collected/Served from Probationers During the Year 1,952 2,000/ 1,806 625 650/ 582 434 500/ 516 338 400/ 394 $1,493,139 $1,026,259 $1,500,000/ $1,777,758 $1,100,000/ $1,276,311 1,900/ 1,771 600/ 619 500/ 593 400/ 448 $1,800,000/ $1,620,258 $1,300,000/ $1,302,506 1,800 600 600 450 $1,700,000 $1,300,000 9