Public Records Act Requests and Pending Litigation

Similar documents
California Public Records Act. Marco A. Gonzalez March 18, 2015

Records to which the public shall have access include but are not limited to:

Presented by County Counsel, Deputies Ronnie Magsaysay and Mark Servino

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

The Public Records Act Requests from a Risk Management Perspective

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO. 10:00 a.m. January 9, 2014 HON. EUGENE L. BALONON

Existence and Scope of the Common Interest Privilege Before and After Ceres

TRI-CITY HEALTHCARE DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS POLICY. As used in this Policy, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

Conflicts of Interest: Rules to Know

Riverside Community College District Policy No General Institution PUBLIC RECORDS REQUESTS AND SUBPOENAS

Transparency Laws: Brown Act and Public Records Act for Public Education Agencies

BRADY DISCOVERY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT (INTERNAL POLICY) Revised April 22, 2010 INTRODUCTION

Supersedes the following Resolutions & Policies:

: SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

PEACE OFFICER PRIVILEGES IN CIVIL LITIGATION: An Introduction to the Pitchess Procedure

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF VENTURA VENTURA MINUTE ORDER

OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY

Frequently Requested Information and Records December 2014 Cumulative Supplement

EXHIBIT A-1 GUIDELINES OF PROFESSIONAL COURTESY AND CIVILITY FOR HAWAI I LAWYERS

Investigations and Enforcement

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE I. INTRODUCTION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE

OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA TONY RACKAUCKAS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Back to previous page: [LETTERHEAD] [DATE] MEET AND CONFER LETTER

Public Records Request

Municipal Records And Open Records. Zindia Thomas Assistant General Counsel Texas Municipal League

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Case No. [redacted]

Bank Procedure. Bank Procedure: Sanctions Proceedings and Settlements in Bank Financed Projects. Bank Access to Information Policy Designation Public

APPEARANCES. See attached Statement of Intended Decision. DATE: 01/23/2015 MINUTE ORDER Page 1 DEPT: C-73. Calendar No.

Citizen Advocacy Center Guide to Illinois Freedom of Information Act

2218 HOMEWOOD WAY, CARMICHAEL, CA PHONE (916) FAX (916)

Code of Procedure for Matters under the Personal Health

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ORDER I. BACKGROUND

Civil Procedure Act 2010

OPEN MEETING LAWS IN CALIFORNIA: RALPH M. BROWN ACT

Privileges Associated with Product Safety Teams

MIGA SANCTIONS PROCEDURES ARTICLE I

IAAF ATHLETICS INTEGRITY UNIT REPORTING, INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION RULES (NON-DOPING)

Hooser v. Superior Court of San Diego County, 84 Cal.App.4th 997, 84 Cal.App.4th 997, 101 Cal.Rptr.2d 341, 101 Cal.Rptr.2d 341 (Cal.App.

British Columbia. Health Professions Review Board. Rules of Practice and Procedure for Reviews under the Health Professions Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c.

Section 1: Statement of Purpose Section 2: Voluntary Discovery Section 3: Discovery by Order of the Court... 2

Consolidated text PROJET DE LOI ENTITLED. The Arbitration (Guernsey) Law, 2016 * [CONSOLIDATED TEXT] NOTE

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

PUBLIC RECORDS ACT POLICY. Policy Number: REC Policy Effective Date: September 6, 2017

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FRESNO

Common Records to be Made Readily Available. District Response to Public Records Requests, Timeliness

14 th JUDICIAL DISTRICT DISTRICT COURT DIVISION GENERAL CIVIL RULES

CURRENT ISSUES UNDER THE BROWN ACT

R in a Nutshell by Mark Meltzer and John W. Rogers

WORLD BANK SANCTIONS PROCEDURES

Resolution Through the Courts TEI Audits & Appeals Seminar

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE. ) ) Plaintiff ) ) ) Defendants RULING RE: ADMISSION OF SURVEILLANCE EVIDENCE

OVERVIEW OF EEOC CHARGE PROCESSING

Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery; Duty of Disclosure [ Proposed Amendment ]

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Guernsey case management and civil proceedings

Writ of Mandate Outline 1 Richard Rothschild Western Center on Law and Poverty , ext. 24;

Today s Topics 8/22/2012. Records Involving Attorney Client Communications and Work Product Public Records Law Webinar Series

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CALIFORNIA S PUBLIC RECORDS ACT

Case: 5:14-cv JRA Doc #: 29 Filed: 01/28/15 1 of 6. PageID #: 284 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

MARCH 2017 Valley Lawyer 15

A Guide to Residential Real Property Arbitration

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POLK COUNTY : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

SUBJECT ACCESS REQUEST

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

Coleman & Horowitt, LLP CLIENT MEMORANDUM. Discussing Issues of Interest to our Clients COMMONLY ASKED QUESTIONS REGARDING COLLECTIONS

by their first names for purposes of clarity. No disrespect is intended.

DSCC Uniform Administrative Procedures Policy

Overview of FOIA Litigation. ASAP National Training Conference. ASAP National Training Conference. Presented by Brent Evitt

Update on 2015 Amendments to the FRCP

TERMS OF REFERENCE. Issued Date: 3 January 2011

Investigations and Enforcement

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 211 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Discovery Requests in Trademark Cases Under U.S. Law

Case 3:14-cv RBL Document 26 Filed 10/23/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO

SECTION 1 INTRODUCTORY RULES...

Attorney for Petitioners RICHARD SANDER and JOE HICKS COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

IN-HOUSE COUNSEL AND PRIVILEGE ISSUES. B. John Pendleton, Jr. DLA Piper LLP (US) 21 September 2012

TGCI LA. FRCP 12/1/15 Changes Key ESI Ones. December Robert D. Brownstone, Esq.

Right-to-Know Law, 65 P.S , et. seq.

THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RECORDS ACT. City of Chula Vista

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

ORDER ESTABLISHING MOTION PRACTICE PROCEDURE. THIS COURT, having determined the need to facilitate an orderly progression of

Remedies: Injunction and Damages. 1. General

Attorney s BriefCase Beyond the Basics Depositions in Family Law Matters

Department 29 Superior Court of California County of Sacramento 720 Ninth Street Timothy M. Frawley, Judge Frank Temmerman, Clerk

JAMS International Arbitration Rules & Procedures

Case 1:15-cv PKC Document 20 Filed 03/07/16 Page 1 of 10. Plaintiffs, 15 Civ (PKC) DECLARATION OF PAUL P. COLBORN

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT. Dept: "24" MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

Case 3:16-cv CRS-CHL Document 36 Filed 06/29/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 423

Transcription:

Public Records Act Requests and Pending Litigation Presented to October 4, 2012 John T. Kennedy, Partner

Public Records Act Request While Lawsuit is Pending The fact that a lawsuit is pending does not necessarily prevent a party to the suit from making a request under the Public Records Act. (Wilder v. Superior Court (1998) 66 Cal.App.4th 77.) 2

Public Records Act vs. Civil Discovery Different scope and procedures apply to a Public Records Act request that present both disadvantages and advantages to the requesting party, as compared to civil discovery. 3

Disadvantages to Requesting Party All privileges that apply to civil discovery also apply to Public Records Act Requests: The PRA exempts from production records, the disclosure of which is exempted or prohibited pursuant to federal or state law, including, but not limited to, provisions of the Evidence Code relating to privilege. (Gov. Code 6254(k).) But not all exemptions under the Public Records Act apply to civil discovery. (Gov. Code 6260; Marylander v. Superior Court (2000) 81 Cal.App.4th 1119.) 4

Public Records Act Exemptions That Do Not Apply in Civil Discovery PRA exempts preliminary drafts, notes, or interagency or intra-agency memoranda that are not retained by the public agency in the ordinary course of business, provided that the public interest in withholding those records clearly outweighs the public interest in disclosure. (Gov. Code 6254(b).) 5

Public Records Act Exemptions That Do Not Apply in Civil Discovery Analogous civil discovery exemption covers only those documents protected by the official information privilege: information acquired in confidence by a public employee in the course of his or her duty and not open, or officially disclosed, to the public prior to the time the claim of privilege is made where there is a necessity for preserving the confidentiality of the information that outweighs the necessity for disclosure in the interest of justice. (Evidence Code 1040; Marylander v. Superior Court (2000) 81 Cal.App.4th 1119.) 6

Public Records Act Exemptions That Do Not Apply in Civil Discovery Balancing of interests exemption applicable only to PRA requests: The agency shall justify withholding any record by demonstrating that... on the facts of the particular case the public interest served by not disclosing the record clearly outweighs the public interest served by disclosure of the record. (Gov. Code 6255.) 7

Public Records Act Exemptions That Do Not Apply in Civil Discovery Gov. Code 6253.2 through 6254.17 exempt numerous types of records for various public policy reasons. 8

Other Disadvantages to the Requesting Party A public agency need only provide documents that exist no requirement to prepare a document or answer substantive questions. (Gov. Code 6252(e).) A public agency is not required to prepare a privilege log in response to a Public Records Act request. (Haynie v. Superior Court (2001) 26 Cal.4th 1061; 71 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 235 (1988).) 9

Other Disadvantages to the Requesting Party The document requested under the PRA must meet the definition of public record: any writing containing information relating to the conduct of the public s business prepared, owned, used or retained by any state or local agency regardless of physical form or characteristics. (Gov. Code 6252(e).) 10

Other Disadvantages to the Requesting Party If the public agency refuses to produce a record, the requesting party must file suit to compel production. (Gov Code 6258.) In civil discovery, the requesting party need only make a motion to compel in the pending litigation, which has a shorter time line. (See e.g. Code Civ. Proc. 2031.310, 2031.320.) 11

Advantages of Making a Public Records Act Request Request can be made during discovery hold at the outset of a case. Request can be made after discovery cutoff, or during/after trial. Request can be made even if motion to compel in the civil case has been denied. (County of Los Angeles v. Superior Court (Axelrad) (2000) 82 Cal.App.4th 819.) 12

Advantages of Making a Public Records Act Request Records may be obtained more quickly under PRA request. Walk-in verbal requests are proper records are open to inspection at all times during office hours and must be made available promptly. (Gov. Code 6253(a), (b).) Agency must respond within 10 days with a determination as to whether records are to be produced (14-day extension available under certain circumstances). (Gov. Code 6253(c).) Civil discovery response times vary from 10 to 30 days, and can be longer. 13

Advantages of Making a Public Records Act Request A PRA request is less expensive to prepare: No attorney need be involved Simple letter, e-mail or verbal request is sufficient to require agency to comply. (Los Angeles Times v. Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority (2001) 88 Cal.App.4 th 1381.) Civil discovery requires that the request be prepared in a particular format. 14

Advantages of Making a Public Records Act Request Party making a PRA request need not show relevance, or any reason for the request. (Gov. Code 6257.5.) Requesting party need not have a personal interest in the information requested ( stealth requests on behalf of others). Party in civil discovery may be required to show relevance to subject matter of litigation or reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. (Code Civ. Proc. 2017.010.) 15

Advantages of Making a Public Records Act Request Public agency has an obligation to assist the requesting party: must assist in narrowing the focus of the request, identifying documents must assist in describing IT and physical location of documents must assist in providing suggestions for overcoming any practical basis for denying access to the records or information sought. (Gov. Code 6253.1(a).) No such formal requirements for civil discovery, other than meet and confer. 16

Advantages of Making a Public Records Act Request Harder for public agency to recover attorneys fees if request unsuccessful: Agency may only recover fees under PRA only if requesting party s case is clearly frivolous. (Gov. Code 6259(d).) Court in civil discovery dispute must award fees to prevailing party unless losing party acted with substantial justification or sanctions would be unjust. (See, e.g. Code Civ. Proc. 2030.010.) 17

The Pending Litigation Exemption Under the Public Records Act An agency need not disclose records pertaining to pending litigation to which the public agency is a party... until the pending litigation has been finally adjudicated or is otherwise settled. (Gov. Code 6254(b).) 18

The Pending Litigation Exemption This exemption has been narrowly construed by the courts: It applies only to documents specifically prepared by, or at the direction of, the local agency for use in litigation; includes documents prepared in anticipation of litigation. (Fairly v. Superior Court (1998) 66 Cal.App.4 th 1414.) It is not, however, limited to documents prepared by agency counsel. (City of Los Angeles v. Superior Court (1996) 41 Cal.App.4 th 1083.) 19

Can an Agency Object to a PRA Request Because a Lawsuit is Pending? Yes, under limited circumstances. Example: a request for an appraisal while an eminent domain lawsuit is pending. (Gov. Code 6254(h).) 20

Can an Agency Object to a PRA Request Because a Lawsuit is Pending? Hypothetical A project opponent sues the lead agency for failure to comply with CEQA. Prior to preparation of the administrative record, the opponent makes a Public Records Act request for numerous documents relating to the project. Can the agency refuse to comply with the request? 21

Can an Agency Object to a PRA Request Because a Lawsuit is Pending? Hypothetical Prior to the date for exchange of expert witness information in a pending suit involving a public agency, one party makes a PRA request for all documents read, considered or relied upon by any expert witness retained by the public agency. Can the agency refuse to comply with the request? 22

Can an Agency Object to a PRA Request Because a Lawsuit is Pending? Hypothetical Prior to the expiration of the initial hold on civil discovery, the plaintiff in a lawsuit with a public agency submits a Public Records Act request for all documents relevant to the issues in the case. Can the agency refuse to comply with the request because the hold on discovery is still in place? 23

Agency s Advantage: Time [May Be] On [Your] Side Public Records Act requests are often time sensitive. Agency may take up to 24 days to provide a substantive response, and may not have to produce documents until later. Lawsuits are rare, and there is almost always time to negotiate, or the issue may become moot. Caution: Agency may not deliberately delay or obstruct. Be sure there is a good faith basis for any objection. (Gov. Code 6253(d).) 24

Questions? John T. Kennedy jkennedy@nossaman.com nossaman.com/employmentlaw EmploymentLawEBuzz.com The information contained herein does not constitute a legal opinion and should not be relied upon by the reader as legal advice or be regarded as a substitute for legal advice. 25