Wisconsin Economic Scorecard

Similar documents
WISCONSIN ECONOMIC SCORECARD

WISCONSIN ECONOMIC SCORECARD

WISCONSIN ECONOMIC SCORECARD

WISCONSIN ECONOMIC SCORECARD

Vermonters Awareness of and Attitudes Toward Sprawl Development in 2002

ADDING RYAN TO TICKET DOES LITTLE FOR ROMNEY IN NEW JERSEY. Rutgers-Eagleton Poll finds more than half of likely voters not influenced by choice

FOURTH ANNUAL IDAHO PUBLIC POLICY SURVEY 2019

PPIC Statewide Survey Methodology

HYPOTHETICAL 2016 MATCH-UPS: CHRISTIE BEATS OTHER REPUBLICANS AGAINST CLINTON STABILITY REMAINS FOR CHRISTIE A YEAR AFTER LANE CLOSURES

NEW JERSEYANS SEE NEW CONGRESS CHANGING COUNTRY S DIRECTION. Rutgers Poll: Nearly half of Garden Staters say GOP majority will limit Obama agenda

HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY POLL MEMO RELEASE 9/24/2018 (UPDATE)

Release #2475 Release Date: Wednesday, July 2, 2014 WHILE CALIFORNIANS ARE DISSATISFIED

FOR RELEASE NOVEMBER 07, 2017

It's Still the Economy

Telephone Survey. Contents *

RUTGERS-EAGLETON POLL: VOTERS STRONGLY SUPPORT SPORTS BETTING

POLL DATA HIGHLIGHTS SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN REGISTERED DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS.

Statewide Survey on Job Approval of President Donald Trump

EU - Irish Presidency Poll. January 2013

RUTGERS-EAGLETON POLL: MOST NEW JERSEYANS SUPPORT DREAM ACT

Kansas Policy Survey: Fall 2001 Survey Results

Kansas Speaks Fall 2018 Statewide Public Opinion Survey

THE GOVERNOR, THE PRESIDENT, AND SANDY GOOD NUMBERS IN THE DAYS AFTER THE STORM

Alberta Provincial Politics Carbon Levy and Rebate Program. Alberta Public Opinion Study October 2017

Mapping Social Cohesion: The Scanlon Foundation surveys 2014

ANNUAL SURVEY REPORT: BELARUS

Critical Insights on Maine TM Tracking Survey ~ Spring 2018 ~

ANNUAL SURVEY REPORT: ARMENIA

NATIONAL: PUBLIC SAYS LET DREAMERS STAY

UTS:IPPG Project Team. Project Director: Associate Professor Roberta Ryan, Director IPPG. Project Manager: Catherine Hastings, Research Officer

Santorum loses ground. Romney has reclaimed Michigan by 7.91 points after the CNN debate.

Critical Insights on Maine TM Tracking Survey ~ Fall 2017 ~

Alberta Carbon Levy and Rebate Program Lethbridge Public Opinion Study Winter 2018

Survey of Pennsylvanians on the Issue of Health Care Reform KEY FINDINGS REPORT

San Diego 2nd City Council District Race 2018

BOOKER V. RIVERA AND THE POWER OF CABLE NEWS OBAMA APPROVAL DOWN SLIGHTLY

Eagleton Institute of Politics Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey 191 Ryders Lane New Brunswick, New Jersey

The National Citizen Survey

Job approval in North Carolina N=770 / +/-3.53%

Proposed gas tax repeal backed five to four. Support tied to voter views about the state s high gas prices rather than the condition of its roads

Analysis: Impact of Personal Characteristics on Candidate Support

European Movement Ireland Research Poll. April 2017 Ref:

Opinion of North Carolina Voters on State Issues TABLE OF CONTENTS

VOTERS AND HEALTH CARE IN THE 2018 CONGRESSIONAL ELECTION

Most opponents reject hearings no matter whom Obama nominates

Gauging the Impact of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, May, 2015, Negative Views of New Congress Cross Party Lines

Views of the Economy by Party --- Now / Reps Dems Inds Reps Dems Inds Good 61% 67% 56% 31% 78% 53% Bad

April 29, NW 13 th Ave., #205 Portland, OR

Release #2345 Release Date: Tuesday, July 13, 2010

NATIONAL: TRUMP RATING TICKS UP; SUPPORT FOR TAX PLAN INCREASES

Should New Zealand s national flag be changed?

Divergences in Abortion Opinions across Demographics. its divisiveness preceded the sweeping 1973 Roe v. Wade decision protecting abortion rights

Wisconsin Public Radio & St. Norbert College Survey Center. THE WISCONSIN SURVEY Presidential Approval and Direction of the Country Spring 2005

MEREDITH COLLEGE POLL September 18-22, 2016

Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax

MEDICAID EXPANSION RECEIVES BROAD SUPPORT CHRISTIE POSITIONED WELL AMONG ELECTORATE IMPROVES UPON FAVORABLES AMONG DEMOCRATS

TIS THE SEASON TO DISLIKE WASHINGTON LEADERS, ESPECIALLY CONGRESS

PUBLIC SAYS IT S ILLEGAL TO TARGET AMERICANS ABROAD AS SOME QUESTION CIA DRONE ATTACKS

Opinion about North Carolina Political Leaders: One Year after Election 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS

CSES Module 5 Pretest Report: Greece. August 31, 2016

COMMUNITY RESILIENCE STUDY

Chapter Six: Learning Objectives. Learning Objectives. Public Opinion and Political Socialization

Greenberg Quinlan Rosner/Democracy Corps

NATIONAL: AMERICA REMAINS DEEPLY DIVIDED

POLL: CLINTON MAINTAINS BIG LEAD OVER TRUMP IN BAY STATE. As early voting nears, Democrat holds 32-point advantage in presidential race

Kansas Speaks 2015 Statewide Public Opinion Survey

Survey on the Death Penalty

Results Embargoed Until Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 12:01am. Hogan Remains Popular; Perceptions of the Maryland Economy Are Positive

Hispanic Attitudes on Economy and Global Warming June 2016

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, May, 2017, Partisan Identification Is Sticky, but About 10% Switched Parties Over the Past Year

THE LOUISIANA SURVEY 2017

NATIONAL: TRUMP S TAX TIME TROUBLES

PRESS RELEASE October 15, 2008

2017 State of the State Courts Survey Analysis

Political Participation

A Study. Investigating Trends within the Jordanian Society regarding Political Parties and the Parliament

THE LOUISIANA SURVEY 2017

PEW RESEARCH CENTER. FOR RELEASE January 16, 2019 FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES:

U.S. Catholics split between intent to vote for Kerry and Bush.

Michigan 14th Congressional District Democratic Primary Election Exclusive Polling Study for Fox 2 News Detroit.

Growing share of public says there is too little focus on race issues

PRRI/The Atlantic April 2016 Survey Total = 2,033 (813 Landline, 1,220 Cell phone) March 30 April 3, 2016

Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate 2016 National Civics Survey Results

THE LOUISIANA SURVEY 2018

Public opinion on the EU referendum question: a new approach. An experimental approach using a probability-based online and telephone panel

Vote Preference in Jefferson Parish Sheriff Election by Gender

Attitudes toward Immigration: Iowa Republican Caucus-Goers

BELIEF IN A JUST WORLD AND PERCEPTIONS OF FAIR TREATMENT BY POLICE ANES PILOT STUDY REPORT: MODULES 4 and 22.

Vancouver Police Community Policing Assessment Report Residential Survey Results NRG Research Group

NATIONAL: PUBLIC DIVIDED ON WHETHER MIGRANT CARAVAN POSES A THREAT

For immediate release Monday, March 7 Contact: Dan Cassino ;

Marist College Institute for Public Opinion Poughkeepsie, NY Phone Fax

North Carolina and the Federal Budget Crisis

Erie County and the Trump Administration

Community perceptions of migrants and immigration. D e c e m b e r

NBC News/Marist Poll. Do you consider your permanent home address to be in Minnesota? Which county in Minnesota do you live in?

FOR RELEASE July 17, 2018

NATIONAL: RACE RELATIONS WORSEN

Record Number Favors Removing U.S. Troops from Afghanistan

Transcription:

RESEARCH PAPER> May 2012 Wisconsin Economic Scorecard Analysis: Determinants of Individual Opinion about the State Economy Joseph Cera Researcher Survey Center Manager The Wisconsin Economic Scorecard is a quarterly poll of Wisconsin residents conducted by the UWM Center for Urban Initiatives and Research, in cooperation with WUWM and WisBusiness.com. In this paper, data from the April 2012 wave of the Wisconsin Economic Scorecard, a quarterly poll of Wisconsin residents conducted by the University of Wisconsin Milwaukee (UWM) Center for Urban Initiatives and Research (CUIR), is used to make inferences about how average Wisconsin residents (defined as those with demographic and socioeconomic attributes that are near the statistical median) tend to feel about the state economy. Cases where demographic or socioeconomic differences between individuals cause differences in opinion are isolated and discussed in detail. The April 2012 Wisconsin Economic Scorecard was a random digit dial (RDD) mobile/landline telephone survey of 545 Wisconsin residents, conducted by the CUIR Survey Center at UWM from March 26-30. The sampling margin of error is ±4.2% at the 95% confidence level. Major findings: Applied Research Technical Assistance Community Initiatives Phone: 414-229-5916 Fax: 414-229-3884 Web: cuir.uwm.edu Political views trump demographic variables and socioeconomic status when it comes to determining individual opinion regarding the general direction of the state. Those in a position to be affected by low demand in the labor market (especially those who are struggling economically due to low income or underemployment) are much more likely than business owners or retirees to express negative views of the current state economy. Conservatives and Republicans are much more likely to hold positive views of the state economy, even when socioeconomic factors are held constant. Future expectations regarding Wisconsin s economy are largely shaped by current economic assessments. While they assess the current economy similarly, women are less optimistic about Wisconsin s future than men, regardless of socioeconomic background or political affiliation. Wisconsin Economic Scorecard

Introduction In this paper, we examine three core questions from the April 2012 wave of the Wisconsin Economic Scorecard: 1) the perceived direction of the state, 2) assessment of current economic performance in Wisconsin, and 3) beliefs regarding future economic performance in the state. For each question, we begin with an aggregate look at how residents as a whole feel, and then drill down to uncover how demographic differences between individuals shape individual views. Using a technique called Maximum-likelihood estimation (MLE), we are able to calculate the predicted probability of an individual with any specific mix of demographic and socioeconomic attributes giving any specific answer to the question under investigation. 1 Maximum-likelihood estimation (MLE) involves taking a random sample set of observations, and then calculating what the overall population would have to look like in order to have the maximum chance of yielding that exact sample. In other words, it is a way of objectively drawing conclusions about the population from sample data. For each question we examine, we present how likely a given individual would be to select each of the possible answer categories, based on his or her demographic characteristics. For the purposes of this analysis, default values for each demographic variable will be set at the sample averages (median values for continuous and ordinal variables, modal values for nominal variables). In other words, the demographic characteristics we use to generate our predictions are the ones that would be likely to be represented were we to repeatedly select and examine random individuals from our sample. This practice ensures that the default predictions we make are likely to be applicable to average members of the population. An average individual chosen from our sample would have the following characteristics: Female 45 to 59 years of age Not yet retired 0 children in household Some college education Homeowner Non-business owner Non-union member Urban resident Politically independent (neither Republican nor Democrat) Ideologically moderate Describes current personal finances as fair Reports no significant economic problems within the last year It is important to note that conclusions we draw in this paper about individuals with this specific set of characteristics ( average residents) can be applied to Wisconsin residents in general, unless we specifically state that this is not the case. For each question regarding perceptions of the state, we specifically isolate and discuss all such situations. If, for example, men tend to feel differently than women about an issue, we explicitly discuss that. 1 When applied to opinion polls that include questions about demographic information, MLE allows us to make predictions about the opinions of individuals in the population based on their characteristics or qualities. Because these predictions are estimated using sample data, they will always be reported with an associated margin of error and confidence level. Wisconsin Economic Scorecard: May 2012 2

Topic 1: Wisconsin headed in the right direction, or on the wrong track? All respondents were asked the following question: When you think about how things are going in the state of Wisconsin, would you say Wisconsin is headed in the right direction, or do you think Wisconsin is on the wrong track? (Follow-up question: strongly or somewhat ) Wisconsin residents are about equally split between feeling that Wisconsin is headed in the right direction (46.0%) and feeling that Wisconsin is on the wrong track (44.7%); the difference between these groups is within the sample margin of error. However, Table 1 shows that those who say Wisconsin is on the wrong track feel more strongly than are those who say Wisconsin is headed in the right direction. Table 1) Frequencies Wisconsin right direction / wrong track Response Number Percent Strongly on wrong track 134 24.6% Somewhat on wrong track 110 20.1% Somewhat in right direction 148 27.2% Strongly in right direction 108 19.8% No opinion 45 8.3% As a whole, Wisconsin residents appear closely divided regarding the direction of the state, but what is an average individual Wisconsin resident likely to say? A resident with average demographic characteristics would be about equally likely to feel that Wisconsin is either headed somewhat in the right direction, somewhat on the wrong track, or strongly on the wrong track. Figure 1 shows that the predicted probability of an average resident giving each of these answers is similar. Somewhat headed in the right direction has a predicted probability of 34.3%, followed by Somewhat on the wrong track at 30.8% and Strongly on the wrong track at 27.5%. There is no statistically significant difference in the likelihood of an average Wisconsin resident choosing any one of these three categories over the other two. However, the average resident is significantly less likely to report that Wisconsin is strongly headed in the right direction; the predicted probability of this occurring is only 7.5%. The predicted probabilities for this question change significantly as values of the following demographic variables change: gender, age, business ownership, union membership, urban/suburban/rural residence, political ideology, party identification, and current personal financial situation. A change in any one of these variables is enough to alter the likely pattern of responses. For example, Figure 2 shows that changing the value of political ideology from moderate to very conservative (while keeping all other variables at median values) increases the predicted probability of the response somewhat headed in the right direction from 34.28% to 46.23%. A change from moderate to very liberal decreases the predicted probability from 34.28% to 14.04%. Women, older residents, union members, Democrats, liberals, and those who describe their personal economic circumstances as poor are all significantly less likely to express optimistic views about the overall direction of the state. Meanwhile, men, younger residents, business owners, rural residents, conservatives, Republicans, and those who describe their personal economic circumstances as good or excellent are all significantly more likely to say Wisconsin is headed in the right direction. (Full model parameters can be found in Appendix A.) Wisconsin Economic Scorecard: May 2012 3

Figure 1) Predicted probabilities of various answers to the question: When you think about how things are going in the state of Wisconsin, would you say Wisconsin is headed in the right direction, or do you think Wisconsin is on the wrong track? 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Strongly wrong track Somewhat wrong track Somewhat right direction Strongly right direction = 95% confidence interval Figure 2) Change in the predicted probability of answering: [Wisconsin is] somewhat headed in the right direction as ideology moves from very conservative to very liberal 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% upper confidence Wisconsin "somewhat headed in right direction" lower confidence Wisconsin Economic Scorecard: May 2012 4

Topic 2: Perceptions of current state economic performance All respondents were asked the following question: Thinking about the economy in the state of Wisconsin right now, would you say the economy in Wisconsin is excellent, good, fair, or poor? A bare majority of Wisconsin residents (50.0%) reported that the Wisconsin economy is fair, while an additional 25.4% reported feeling it is poor. Just 22.9% reported feeling that the Wisconsin economy is currently good. A mere 1.0% reported that the economy is excellent. Table 2 shows that on the whole, Wisconsin residents are negative about the current state economy. Table 1) Frequencies Wisconsin economy right now Response Number Percentage Excellent 5 1.0% Good 125 22.9% Fair 273 50.0% Poor 139 25.4% No opinion 4 0.7% The average individual Wisconsin resident would likely reflect a negative attitude about the Wisconsin economy. Figure 3 shows that the predicted probability that a Wisconsin resident with average demographic characteristics would say the economy was fair is 58.9%, followed by poor at 28.6%, and good at 12.3%. The probability that such a resident would say the Wisconsin economy is currently excellent is 0.2%. Figure 3) Predicted probabilities of various answers to the question: Thinking about the economy in the state of Wisconsin right now, would you say the economy in Wisconsin is excellent, good, fair, or poor? 70.00% 60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% Excellent Good Fair Poor = 95% confidence interval Wisconsin Economic Scorecard: May 2012 5

An interesting set of demographic variables influence predicted responses to this question. As with the right direction/wrong track question, political variables such as party identification and political ideology have a strong influence on responses. For example, conservatives are more likely than liberals to say the current Wisconsin economy is good, even when all other variables are held constant at median values (Figure 4). While 1 in 5 conservatives could be expected to report a good economy, only 1 in 20 liberals would agree, all other factors held equal. However, variables that involve personal economic circumstances also cause significant differences in how a median resident responds to this question. Figure 5 shows how among respondents with median demographic characteristics, those who describe their personal financial situation as excellent are dramatically more likely to say the Wisconsin economy is good than those reporting less positive personal financial situations. A resident with excellent personal finances would be expected to perceive the economy as good about 40% of the time, while an individual with poor finances would share that view only about 5% of the time. Figure 4) Change in the predicted probability of answering: [Wisconsin s economy is] good as ideology moves from very conservative to very liberal 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% upper confidence Wisconsin economy "good" lower confidence Wisconsin Economic Scorecard: May 2012 6

Figure 5) Change in the predicted probability of answering: [Wisconsin s economy is] good as self-reported personal financial situation moves from poor to excellent 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% upper confidence Wisconsin economy "good" 10% 5% lower confidence 0% poor personal financial situation fair personal financial situation good personal financial situation excellent personal financial situation In addition to personal finances, frequency of significant economic problems, business ownership, and retirement status are also influential. Those who reported more significant economic problems in the last year were more likely to have negative views of the state economy, even when other factors were held constant. Business owners and retirees were more likely to express more positive views than non-owners and those who had not yet retired, even when other demographic variables were held at their sample median values. The implication of these data is that there are two main forces driving current perceptions of the Wisconsin economy personal political beliefs and personal financial realities. Those in a position to be negatively affected by low demand in the labor market (especially those who are struggling economically due to unemployment or low income) are much more likely than business owners or retirees to express negative views of the current state economy. At the same time, those sharing an ideological stance or a party label with the current state administration (conservatives and Republicans) are also more likely than other groups to express positive views of the current state economy, even when personal economic status is held constant. While these effects appear to be relatively independent, the fact that the current state administration is affiliated with a political party that has historically favored management over labor means that the two effects will often reinforce each other at the individual level. Wisconsin Economic Scorecard: May 2012 7

Topic 3: Expectations for Wisconsin s economic future All respondents were asked the following question: Over the next year, do you expect the economy in Wisconsin to get better, get worse, or stay about the same? Despite a marginally negative mass attitude about the current Wisconsin economy, Wisconsin residents are, on aggregate, quite optimistic about the performance of the state economy over the next year. Table 3 reveals that almost half (45.3%) report a belief that Wisconsin s economy will get better within a 1-year timeframe. Just over a third of residents (35.5%) say they think the state economy will stay about the same. Only a small minority (12.3%) report a belief that the economy will get worse over the next year. Table 3) Frequencies Wisconsin economy over the next year Response Number Percentage Get worse 67 12.3% Stay about the same 193 35.5% Get better 247 45.3% No opinion 38 6.9% While a slightly higher proportion of residents reported optimistic versus neutral views on the future of the state economy, individual-level analysis shows that the average Wisconsin resident would be about equally as likely to say stay about the same as get better when asked about the future of the state economy. Figure 6 shows a large overlap in the confidence intervals surrounding the predicted probability of an average respondent selecting these answer categories, indicating that the difference is statistically insignificant. However, the predicted probability of an average resident expressing pessimism about Wisconsin s economic future is significantly lower; based on the data collected, there is only a 13.0% chance that such a respondent would express the opinion that the state economy will get worse over the next year. Figure 6) Predicted probabilities of various answers to the question: Thinking about the economy in the state of Wisconsin right now, would you say the economy in Wisconsin is excellent, good, fair, or poor? 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Get worse Stay about the same Get better = 95% confidence interval Wisconsin Economic Scorecard: May 2012 8

Figure 6) Change in the predicted probability of answering: [Wisconsin s economy will] Get better [over the next year] as Assessment of Wisconsin s economy right now moves from poor to excellent 100.00% 90.00% 80.00% 70.00% 60.00% 50.00% upper confidence 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% current economy "poor" current economy "fair" current economy "good" current economy "excellent" Wisconsin economy "get better" in next year lower confidence What explains this optimism? Analysis shows that the strongest predictor of beliefs about Wisconsin s economic near future is current assessments of state economic performance. Figure 6 shows that residents with average demographic characteristics who believe the current state economy is fair, good, or excellent are all more likely than not to express optimism about the future economy. There is a statistically significant difference in opinion about the future between median residents who say the current economy is excellent and those who say it is poor; only those who feel the current economy is poor are unlikely to express optimism about the future. Current assessment of the Wisconsin economy does a better job predicting views about the future than any other variable we measured. While current economic assessments are themselves predicted to a degree by a set of demographic, socioeconomic, and political variables, there are many circumstantial factors not measured here that also influence those judgments. When added to the model, current economic assessments explain future assessments much more effectively than any single demographic, socioeconomic, or political variable. Of these other variables, only political ideology (conservatives were slightly more likely than liberals to express optimism about the future) and gender (women were slightly less optimistic about future economic performance) were influential, when other factors were held at their median values. (Full model parameters can be found in Appendix C.) Wisconsin Economic Scorecard: May 2012 9

Appendix A Dependent Variable: Wisconsin Right Direction/Wrong Track (Ordered Probit) Observations 446 Prob > chi² 0.00 Pseudo-R² 0.22 Independent Variables Coefficient (standard error) *sig 95% # problems -.33 (.05) # children in household.09 (.15) Union member -.45 (.17) * Business owner.30 (.17) Suburban.20 (.15) Rural.26 (.13) * Party identification.60 (.10) * Retired.20 (.16) Female -.41 (12) * Ideology.41 (.06) * Own home.15 (.04) Education -.04 (.04) Age -.19 (.09) * Personal finances.27 (.08) * Wisconsin Economic Scorecard: May 2012 10

Appendix B Dependent Variable: Current Wisconsin Economy (Ordered Probit) Observations 471 Prob > chi² 0.00 Pseudo-R² 0.13 Independent Variables Coefficient (standard error) *sig 95% # problems -.09 (.05) # children in household.14 (.15) Union member -.26 (.20) Business owner.27 (.14) Suburban -.24 (.16) Rural -.19 (.13) Party identification.20 (.09) * Retired.27 (.16) * Female -.09 (.12) Ideology.18 (.06) * Own home -.14 (.15) Education -.04 (.04) Age -.18 (.07) * Personal finances.46 (.08) * Wisconsin Economic Scorecard: May 2012 11

Appendix C Dependent Variable: Wisconsin Economy Over the Next Year (Ordered Probit) Observations 430 Prob > chi² 0.00 Pseudo-R² 0.07 Independent Variables Coefficient (standard error) *sig 95% # problems -.01 (.06) # children in household.20 (.16) Union member.07 (.17) Business owner.27 (.17) Suburban.00 (.17) Rural -.09 (.16) Party identification.13 (.11) Retired.03 (.18) Female -.36 (.13) * Ideology.18 (.07) * Own home -.12 (.17) Education.03 (.04) Age.06 (.09) Personal finances -.04 (.09) Current economic assessment.32 (.10) * Wisconsin Economic Scorecard: May 2012 12